Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUSRE40914 E1
Publication typeGrant
Application numberUS 09/827,252
Publication dateSep 8, 2009
Filing dateApr 5, 2001
Priority dateOct 20, 1997
Also published asCA2280589A1, CA2280589C, DE69828379D1, EP0948292A1, EP0948292B1, US5891143, WO1999020193A1
Publication number09827252, 827252, US RE40914 E1, US RE40914E1, US-E1-RE40914, USRE40914 E1, USRE40914E1
InventorsJ. Charles Taylor, Harold S Taylor
Original AssigneeSmith & Nephew, Inc.
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Orthopaedic fixation plate
US RE40914 E1
Abstract
A plate for use in fixating the position of a first bone segment relative to a second bone segment, the plate comprising a body portion having a plurality of attachment mechanisms located therein, wherein the attachment mechanisms include: a first group of three attachment mechanisms substantially positioned within 90°-150° of one another about a circle, and preferably within substantially 120° of one another, whereby the first group of attachment mechanisms is designed to facilitate attachment of a plurality of adjustable length struts to the plate; and a second group of attachment mechanisms substantially positioned about the circle that are designed to facilitate attachment of accessories to the plate, wherein the total number of the attachment mechanisms is a multiple of three.
Images(8)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(29)
1. An orthopaedic spatial fixation system for holding bone parts comprising a plurality of fixation plates wherein each plate includes a body portion having n holesattachment structures positioned therein, whereby said holesattachment structures are substantially positioned along an arc of α° of a circle defined by a diameter d, and the corda chord length between adjacent holesattachment structures is substantialsubstantially equal to 1and is substantially equal between all attachment structures, and d = l ( 1 tan 2 ( α 2 n ) + 1 ) )
and whereby the diameter d for each plate within the system is unique, and the value for n(360/α) for each consecutive plate diameter d in the system is a multiple of 3, and
wherein at least two of the fixation plates are connected to each other by at least six substantially rigid, adjustable length struts, wherein each of the struts is disposed substantially diagonally with respect to its adjacent struts.
2. The orthopaedic spatial fixation system of claim 1 further comprising bone pins for interfacing the bone parts and plates; and,
a plurality ofwherein the struts that extend between the plates to hold the plates in a selected position relative to one another and relative to the bone parts;
wherein the struts are attached to the plates at the holesattachment structures; and,
wherein a plurality of the struts have adjustable length sections for varying the length of the strut to adjust the relative position of the plates.
3. The orthopaedic spatial fixation system of claim 2 wherein the holesattachment structures on at least one of the plates are one hundred twenty degrees (120°) apart.
4. The orthopaedic spatial fixation system of claim 1 wherein rotation of one plate one hundred twenty degrees (120°) relative to an adjacent plate results in the same alignment of adjacent holesattachment structures as before such rotation of the plates.
5. The orthopaedic spatial fixation system of claim 1 wherein the plates are symmetrically configured so that if one plate is placed over an adjacent plate, the holesattachment structures in each plate can be aligned.
6. The orthopaedic spatial fixation system of claim 5 wherein the plates are symmetrically configured so that one plate can be flipped over without affecting the alignment of adjacent holesattachment structures.
7. The orthopaedic spatial fixation system of claim 2 wherein there are two plates and each plate includes 3 holesattachment structures.
8. The orthopaedic spatial fixation system of claim 7 wherein
there arethe struts comprise only six struts each having a first end and a second end;
the first end of each strut is attached to one of the plates and the second end of each strut is attached to the other plate;
the ends of the struts are attached to the plates at the holesattachment structures; and, each holeattachment structure accommodates two strut ends, one from each of two adjacent struts.
9. The orthopaedic spatial fixation system of claim 1, wherein the attachment structures are holes.
10. The orthopaedic spatial fixation system of claim 1, wherein the circle comprises a groove and the attachment structures are clamps attached to the groove.
11. The orthopaedic spatial fixation system of claim 1, further comprising markings or etches to designate the attachment structure positions.
12. The orthopaedic spatial fixation system of claim 1, further comprising one or more plates being multiple diameter plates having a second set of attachment structures.
13. The orthopaedic spatial fixation system of claim 12, wherein the second set of attachment structures is not spaced according to the diameter equation and chord length limitations.
14. The orthopaedic spatial fixation system of claim 1, wherein the chord length between adjacent attachment structures is between about 0.48 inches and about 0.52 inches.
15. An orthopaedic spatial fixation system, comprising a plurality of arcuate shaped fixation plates, wherein each plate comprises a plurality of attachment structures, at least some of which have substantially uniform sizes and a geometrical arrangement defined whereby the attachment structures are: (a) in sets of three, (b) spaced substantially 120 degrees apart from each other along an arc of the fixation plate, and (c) substantially equally spaced apart; wherein rotating a first one of the fixation plates substantially 120 degrees from a starting position in a plane substantially parallel to another one of the fixation plates causes the first fixation plate to present the same geometrical arrangement of attachment structures as the geometrical arrangement of the attachment structures of the another plate, and
wherein at least two of the fixation plates are connected to each other by at least six substantially rigid, adjustable length struts, wherein each of the struts is disposed substantially diagonally with respect to its adjacent struts.
16. The orthopaedic spatial fixation system of claim 15, whereby rotating the first fixation plate substantially 60 degrees from the starting position in a plane substantially parallel to another one of the fixation plates presents the same geometrical arrangement of attachment structures as the geometrical arrangement of the attachment structures of the another plate.
17. The orthopaedic spatial fixation system of claim 15, wherein the number of attachment points is a multiple of six, providing 2×3 symmetry.
18. The orthopaedic spatial fixation system of claim 15, wherein at least one of the fixation plates is ring shaped.
19. The orthopaedic spatial fixation system of claim 15, wherein the plurality of attachment structures is positioned such that in use, at least some of the attachment structures on one of the plates move into alignment with at least some of the attachment structures on another plate as adjustment is effected.
20. The orthopaedic spatial fixation system of claim 15, wherein the attachment structures are positioned along an arc of α° of a circle defined by a diameter d, and a chord length between adjacent attachment structures is substantially equal to l, and the defined relationship comprises d = l ( 1 tan 2 ( α 2 n ) + 1 ) )
21. The orthopaedic spatial fixation system of claim 15, wherein the orthopaedic spatial fixation system is adapted to be positioned on a patient.
22. The orthopaedic spatial fixation system of claim 15, wherein the struts comprise only six adjustable struts, a first end of each of the struts connected to one of the attachment structures on one of the fixation plates and a second end of each of the struts connected to one of the attachment structures on another one of the fixation plates, wherein the attachment structures connected to the struts are each connected to two struts.
23. The orthopaedic spatial fixation system of claim 15, wherein the struts comprise only six adjustable struts, each strut connected at a first end to one of the attachment structures of one of the fixation plates and each strut connected at a second end to one of the attachment structures of another one of the fixation plates, wherein each attachment structure that is connected to a strut is only connected to one strut.
24. The orthopaedic spatial fixation system of claim 15, wherein a chord length between adjacent attachment structures is between about 0.48 inches and about 0.52 inches.
25. An orthopaedic spatial fixation system, comprising a plurality of fixation plates wherein each plate comprises a plurality of attachment structures, at least some of the attachment structures being in sets of three attachment points, each plate having a geometrical arrangement defined whereby the three attachment points in a set are spaced substantially 120 degrees apart from each other along an arc of the fixation plate; wherein at least two of the fixation plates are connected to each other by at least six substantially rigid, adjustable length struts, wherein each of the struts are disposed substantially diagonally with respect to its adjacent struts, and the number of attachment structures on each plate being a multiple of 3, whereby rotating the first fixation plate substantially 120 degrees from a starting position in a plane substantially parallel to another one of the fixation plates presents the same geometrical arrangement of attachment points as the geometrical arrangement of attachment points presented to the struts when the first fixation plate is in the starting position.
26. The orthopaedic spatial fixation system of claim 25, further comprising an accessory adapted to be attached to one or more of the fixation plates.
27. The orthopaedic spatial fixation system of claim 25, wherein the orthopaedic spatial fixation system is adapted to be positioned on a patient.
28. The orthopaedic spatial fixation system of claim 25, wherein the struts comprise only six struts, a first end of each of the struts connected to one of the attachment structures on one of the fixation plates and a second end of each of the struts connected to one of the attachment structures on another one of the fixation plates, wherein the attachment structures connected to struts are each connected to two struts.
29. The orthopaedic spatial fixation system of claim 25, wherein a chord length between adjacent attachment structures is between about 0.48 inches and about 0.52 inches.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to a plate for use as part of an external fixation device, and more particularly to a unique hole pattern within the plate.

2. General Background and Description of the Prior Art

Traditional circular ring external fixation devices consist of Ilizarov-type devices that are based on a circumferential external fixator system disclosed by G. A. Ilizarov during the early 1950's. The Ilizarov system includes at least two rings or “halos” that encircle a patient's body member (e.g., a patient's leg), connecting rods extending between the two rings, transfixion pins that extend through the patient's boney structure, and connectors for connecting the transfixion pins to the rings. Use of the Ilizarov system to deal with angulation, translation and rotation is disclosed in “Basic Ilizarov Techniques,” Techniques in Orthopaedics®, Vol. 5, Nov. 4, December 1990, pages 55-59.

The Ilizarov system provides an external fixation frame that allows for gradual correction along and about six axes; however such frames require many parts and are relatively complicated to build and use in a clinical situation. In addition, often orthopedic external fixators such as Ilizarov frames must be modified after their initial application. Such modification may be necessary to convert from one correctional axis to another. Alternatively, such modifications may allow conversion from an initial adjustment type of frame to a weight bearing type frame, since some of the correctional configurations are not stable enough for weight bearing.

The rings used in the Ilizarov devices include a plurality of spaced apertures or holes that allow for the attachment of various accessories to the device. The pattern of Ilizarov ring holes is primarily determined as a function of the diameter of the ring. Conventional wisdom teaches that for any given diameter, the ring should include the maximum number of equally spaced arcuately positioned holes. Those skilled in the art believe that such hole positioning provides the surgeon with the greatest degree of flexibility in constructing the often times complicated and elaborate Ilizarov frame configuration. The Ilizarov ring holes, although equally spaced about a circle, are positioned such that the location of any given hole relative to another hole on additional rings attached thereto, is completely irrelevant.

Applicants have recently developed a new external fixation device known as the Taylor Spatial Frame™ external fixator. This device is described and claimed in the allowed U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/782,731 entitled “Orthopaedic Fixation Device.” In addition, applicants have developed a unique method of using the Taylor Spatial Frame™ fixator that is the subject of allowed U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/726,713 entitled “Method of Using An Orthopaedic Fixation Device.” Both of these patent applications are incorporated herein by reference. As disclosed in these prior patents, the Taylor Spatial Frame™ fixator, in its preferred embodiment, consists of two ring plates interconnected by six adjustable length struts. This device can be configured to correct virtually an infinite number of deformities, each of which would have otherwise required the construction of a specific custom Ilizarov frame.

As with the prior art Ilizarov fixator, the Taylor Spatial Frame™ fixator plates include a plurality of spaced apertures or holes therethrough for attaching accessories to the device. In addition, the plates include plurality of cavities or holes for attachment of the struts to the rings. Applicants have now developed a unique hole placement scheme for the Taylor Spatial FRAME™ fixator rings. This unique hole placement scheme takes advantage of the unique nature of the Taylor Spatial Frame™ fixator and the unique method of using the same, and provides substantial advantages over the unsystematically placed hole patterns utilized in Ilizarov rings.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

It is an object of the present invention to provide a novel external fixation plate that can be used as part of the Taylor Spatial FRAME™ fixator, and facilitates the unique method of using the Taylor Spatial Frame™ fixator.

It is a further object of the present invention to provide a novel external fixation plate that easy to manufacture, and simplifies the fixator construction process.

It is a further object of the present invention to provide a novel external fixation plate that offers various clinical advantages over prior art designs by providing a convenient frame of reference to aid a surgeon in preoperative planning and surgical application of the device.

It is a further object of the present invention to provide a system of plates, wherein each plate within the system offers unique symmetrical properties and common hole spacing.

It is a further object of the present invention to provide a hole scheme for an external fixation plate that provides a clear geometric relationship between the holes on such plate relative to other holes on the same plate or holes on attached plates.

These and other objects are realized by a fixation plate that includes a plurality of attachment mechanisms located thereon. The attachment mechanism preferably consists of a plurality of equally spaced and symmetrically positioned holes. In accordance with a preferred embodiment, the present invention includes a plate having a body portion that includes a plurality of substantially equally spaced apertures or holes positioned arcuately therein. The holes are designed to facilitate attachment of a plurality of adjustable length struts that interconnect one or more plates, and the attachment of various accessories to the plates. The strut holes and the accessory holes may be indistinguishable or they may be different. The arrangement of the holes provides triple symmetry, and preferably 2×3 symmetry. Based on a defined geometric relationship between plate holes, a system of plates can be designed that offer triple symmetry or 2×3 symmetry.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a top view of a plate in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a perspective view of an external fixation device incorporating one embodiment of the novel plate of the present invention.

FIG. 3 is an enlarged view of a portion of one of the plates shown in FIG. 2.

FIG. 4 is a perspective view of an external fixation device incorporating an alternative embodiment of the novel plate of the present invention.

FIG. 5 is an enlarged view of a portion of a plate of the present invention, and illustrates the geometric relationship between two adjacent holes.

FIG. 6 is a top view of a plate in accordance with an alternative embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 7 is a top view of a plate in accordance with an alternative embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 8 is a top view of a plate in accordance with an alternative embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 9 is a top view of a plate in accordance with an alternative embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 10 is a top view of a plate in accordance with an alternative embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 11 is a perspective view of an external fixation device incorporating an alternative embodiment of the novel plate of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Because of the unique nature of the Taylor Spatial FRAME™ fixator and the unique method of using the Taylor Spatial FRAME™ fixator, the position of a given hole relative to another hole, either on the same plate or a different plate, is very important. Indeed, we have found that the correct positioning of the holes simplifies the manufacturing and device construction processes, simplifies the method of using the device by simplifying the geometric analysis of the system, and provides a number of clinical advantages.

FIG. 1 illustrates a fixator plate in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention. The plate 2 includes a circuit body portion 4 fabricated from a suitably strong and rigid material such as a metal, alloy, plastic, composite, or ceramic. The body portion 4 includes a plurality of substantially equally spaced apertures or holes 8 positioned arcuately therein. In the specific embodiment shown in FIG. 1, the center of the holes 8 form a complete circle as illustrated by the broken line 10, wherein the circle has a center c and a radius of r. It is important to note that each hole 8 may have a different diameter or shape as long as the center of the hole substantially intersects with the circle 10.

As illustrated in FIG. 2 and FIG. 4, the holes 8 are designed to facilitate attachment of a plurality of adjustable length struts 20 that interconnect one or more plates 2. In accordance with the preferred embodiment of the present invention, six struts 20 are used to interconnect two plates 2. In addition, the holes 8 are designed to facilitate attachment of various accessories to the plate 2, such as for example, wires (not shown), clamps 24, pins 26, additional plates, etc. In accordance with the embodiment shown in FIG. 1 and FIG. 4, the strut holes and the accessory holes are indistinguishable, i.e. any hole 8 can be selected to serve as a strut hole or an accessory hole. In accordance with an alternative embodiment, as shown in FIG. 2, the accessory holes 14 and the strut holes 12 are different.

As illustrated in FIG. 2, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, each plate 2 has three actual strut attachment positions 16. In addition, each plate 2 includes three additional strut positions 18 that are not actually used. The unused strut positions 18 are included to provide a 2×3 symmetrical design, which is discussed in greater detail below. In the preferred embodiment of the invention as shown in FIG. 2, the used strut attachment holes 16 should be positioned approximately 120° from one another so as to form a substantially equilateral triangle. Similarly, the unused strut attachment holes 18 should be positioned approximately 120° from one another so as to form a second substantially equilateral triangle. The two overlapping triangles are illustrated by broken lines in FIG. 1, and are designated triangle A and triangle B. Alternatively, one or more strut attachment holes 16, 18 can deviate slightly from its ideal 120° position. Such deviation, however, should be less than 30°, but preferably no more than 15°, and ideally less than 6°.

Unlike the unsystematically positioning of prior art Ilizarov ring holes, the holes 8 in the present device are preferably strategically positioned within plate 2 to provide 2×3 symmetrically throughout a complete system of plates. 2×3 symmetry is achieved when the holes are positioned such that the plate can be rotated in increments of 180° about a first axis and increments of 120° about a second axis, and each time maintain identical hole positions. For example, the plate 2 can be rotated 180° about an axis passing through center c and within the plane of the plate 2, i.e. the x axis shown in FIG. 2. Such a rotation would essentially flip plate 2 over. For both of the two possible positions, the hole pattern within plate 2 would be identical. This characteristic represents the “2” of the 2×3 symmetry. Similarly, plate 2 can be rotated in increments of 120° about an axis perpendicular to the plate and passing through center c, i.e. the y axis shown in FIG. 2. There are three possible positions that the plate 2 could assume by making 120° rotation about the y axis. Following each rotation, however, the resulting hole positions will remain unchanged. This characteristic represents the “3” of the 2×3 symmetry. In accordance with the present invention, a system of plates is provided, as described hereinbelow, wherein each plate within the system offers at least triple symmetry (i.e., the “3” symmetry), and preferably each plate offers complete 2×3 symmetry.

In order to obtain the 2×3 symmetry, as noted above, plate 2 should include two sets of three strut holes with each strut hole 12 positioned about 60° apart in a circle. In addition, 2×3 symmetry requires that the total number of holes 8 (including both strut holes 12 and accessory holes 14) be a multiple of six (6). For triple symmetry alone, however, the total number of holes 8 need only be a multiple of three (3). Furthermore, the accessory holes should be equally spaced. One skilled in the art will appreciate that asymmetrical “dummy” holes can be added to the plate 2. Such a plate would nonetheless fall within the scope of the present invention.

As illustrated in FIG. 3, the spacing between the accessory holes 14 can be measured in terms of the arc length larc along circle 10 or in terms of the chord length lchord. In accordance with the preferred embodiment, the distance between holes 14 is measured by the chord length Ichord, and such lengths are equal. Furthermore, the distance between each strut hole 12 and its adjacent accessory hole 14 need not be the same as the distance between two adjacent accessory holes 14. As illustrated in FIG. 3, this distance can be measured along arc as darc or along the chord as decor. In accordance with the preferred embodiment of the present invention, the chord lengths between every accessory hole 14 and its adjacent accessory hole 14 or strut hole 12 are equal, that is dchord=lchord. In addition, the chord length is should be greater than about 0.475 inch, but preferably is between about 0.48-0.52 inch, and most preferably equal to about 0.5 inch.

In accordance with the specific embodiment of the present invention illustrated in FIG. 2, the exact positions of the holes 8 are determined as follows. The process is very different from the unsystematic positioning of the holes in prior art Ilizarov devices, which starts with determining the ring diameter. The Taylor Spatial Frame™ fixator hole positions are determined by first determining the hole spacing, and then determining the number of holes that will be used. The present hole positioning scheme starts with the number of holes because it is important that the number be a multiple of three to maintain the requisite symmetry. Once the distance between the holes and the number of holes is determined, the diameter of the ring is defined by the formula: diameter = l ( ( 1 tan 2 ( 180 N ) + 1 ) )
where l is the chord distance between holes 8, and N is the total number of holes.

As illustrated in FIG. 5, for any given two adjacent holes 8, the angle between the holes is θ, and the chord between the holes is 1. An isosceles triangle T is formed by connecting the two adjacent plate holes 8 and the center c of the circle 10. If a line 28 having length b is formed in the middle of the isosceles triangle T, two right triangles are formed, and the following relationships exists: b 2 + ( 1 / 2 l ) 2 = r 2 and ( 1 ) TAN ( 1 / 2 θ ) = 1 / 2 l b ( 2 )
where r represents the radius of the circle 10. If for convenience we define v=˝l and Q=tan (˝θ), the following relationships can be derived from the above equations:

From Equation (1) b 2 = r 2 - v 2 ( 3 ) b = r 2 - v 2 ( 4 )

From Equation (2) Q = v b ( 5 )

Combining (4) and (5) Q = v r 2 - v 2 ( 6 )
solving for the radius r gives: r = v 2 Q 2 + v 2 or r = v 2 ( 1 Q 2 + 1 ) ( 7 )
Therefore, for any plate having N holes and a chord distance of 1 between adjacent holes, the diameter of the circle that defines the hole locations can be expressed mathematically as diameter = 2 ( ( l 2 ) 2 ( 1 tan 2 ( 1 / 2 θ ) + 1 ) ) ( 8 ) = l ( ( 1 tan 2 ( 1 / 2 θ ) + 1 ) ) ( 9 )
If the total number of holes in the ring will be N, then θ=360°/N, and diameter = l ( ( 1 tan 2 ( 180 N ) + 1 ) ) ( 10 )
Using the relationship defined in equation 10, a system of rings including a variety of ring diameters can be developed wherein each ring has triple symmetry and the hole spacing for each ring is the same. The following table illustrates such a system wherein the hole spacing in 0.5 inch:

TABLE I
Chord
Length (l) Number of Diameter angle (θ)
(inches) Holes (N) (inches) (degrees)
0.5 3 0.5776 130
0.5 6 1.0030 60
0.5 9 1.4519 40
0.5 12 1.9319 30
0.5 15 2.4049 24
0.5 18 2.8794 20
0.5 21 3.3548 17.143
0.5 24 3.8306 15
0.5 27 4.3069 13.333
0.5 30 4.7834 12
0.5 33 5.2601 10.939
0.5 36 5.7369 10
0.5 39 6.2138 9.281
0.5 42 6.6907 8.571
0.5 45 7.1678 8
0.5 48 7.6449 7.5
0.5 51 8.1220 7.059
0.5 54 8.5992 6.657
0.5 57 9.0764 6.316
0.5 60 9.5537 6
0.5 63 10.0309 5.714286
0.5 66 10.5082 5.454545
0.5 69 10.9855 5.217391
0.5 72 11.4628 5
0.5 75 11.9401 4.8
0.5 78 12.4174 4.615385
0.5 81 12.8948 4.444444
0.5 84 13.3721 4.285714
0.5 87 13.8497 4.137931
0.5 90 14.3269 4
0.5 93 14.8042 3.870968
0.5 96 15.2816 3.75
0.5 99 15.7590 3.635364
0.5 102 16.2364 3.529412
0.5 105 16.7138 3.428571
0.5 108 17.1912 3.333333
0.5 111 17.6686 3.243243
0.5 114 18.1460 3.157895
0.5 117 18.6234 3.076923
0.5 120 19.1008 3
0.5 123 19.5782 2.826829
0.5 126 20.0556 2.857143
0.5 129 20.5330 2.790698

The triple symmetry for the complete system is realized by only including rings where the numbers of holes in each plate is a multiple of three. Similarly, a system with complete 2×3 symmetry can be designed by using plates where the number of holes in each plate is a multiple of six.

As noted above, the arc length, as opposed to the chord length, between adjacent holes 8 can be fixed. If the arc length between the holes 8 is fixed, for a given arc length k and holes N, the circumference of the circle 10 will equal k×N. Therefore the diameter would be:
diameter=kN/π
Using this relationship, a plate system such as following can be made:

TABLE II
Arc
Length Number Diameter
(inches) of Holes (inches)
0.5 6 0.9549
0.5 9 1.4324
0.5 12 1.9099
0.5 15 2.3873
0.5 18 2.8648
0.5 21 3.3423
0.5 24 3.8197
0.5 27 4.2972
0.5 30 4.7746
0.5 33 5.2521
0.5 36 5.7296
0.5 39 6.2070
0.5 42 6.6845
0.5 45 7.1620
0.5 48 7.6394
0.5 51 8.1169
0.5 54 8.5944
0.5 57 9.0718
0.5 60 9.5493
0.5 63 10.0268
0.5 66 10.5042
0.5 69 10.9817
0.5 72 11.4592
0.5 75 11.9366
0.5 78 12.4141
0.5 81 12.8916
0.5 84 13.3690
0.5 87 13.8465
0.5 90 14.3239
0.5 93 14.8014
0.5 96 15.2789
0.5 99 15.7563
0.5 102 16.2338
0.5 105 16.7113
0.5 108 17.1887
0.5 111 17.6662
0.5 114 18.1437
0.5 117 18.6211
0.5 120 19.0986
0.5 123 19.5761
0.5 126 20.0535
0.5 129 20.5310

FIG. 4 illustrates an alternative embodiment of the present invention. Unlike the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 2, the adjoining struts 20 in FIG. 4 do not connect to the plates 2 at a single common hole 8. As a result, each plate 2 in FIG. 4 includes six (6) strut holes 32 that are connected to a strut 20. As illustrated, the adjacent connecting strut holes 32 are separated by a single unused hole 30. In other embodiments of the present invention, the adjacent connecting strut holes 32 may be separated by no holes or by more than one unused hole 30. When adjacent struts 20 do not terminate at a common hole a theoretical strut hole should be determined. As illustrated in FIG. 6, the theoretical strut hole 34 is positioned along the arc of circle 10 half way between the two actual strut holes 32, i.e. along the circle 10 at the bisector of the two actual strut holes. When adjacent struts terminate at a single strut hole as in FIG. 2, the theoretical strut hole is the actual strut hole. In accordance with the present invention, the theoretical strut holes 34 on plate 2 should form two overlapping triangles A, B in the same manner described above regarding the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 2. As with the actual strut holes, the chords connecting the theoretical strut holes 34 preferably form two substantially equilateral triangles. The theoretical strut holes 34, however, may deviate from their ideal 120° positions to the same extent described above with regard to actual strut holes.

The extent to which an actual strut hole 32 can deviate from its theoretical strut hole is limited. As this deviation increases, the range of movement between the two plates 2 is reduced. The reduced range limits the various configurations that the device can assume, and therefore, limits the types of deformities that can be corrected with the device. As a result, the deviation of an actual strut hole 32 from its theoretical strut hole should be less than about 30°, but can be less than 12°, and preferable no more than about 6°.

The hole spacing scheme of the present invention can be utilized to design plates having holes that do not form a complete circle. For example, a half plate or a ⅙ plate, as illustrated in FIGS. 7 and 8 respectively, can be designed. In addition, the plate itself need not be circular, as illustrated in the embodiment shown in FIG. 9.

The mathematical relationships between hole spacing, the number of holes and the diameter that are set forth above specifically relate to a hole pattern that forms a complete circle and includes equally spaced hole around the entire circle. These mathematical relationships, however, can be adapted to describe the hole pattern for a partial circle. For example, assume that you wanted n holes positioned about a partial ring that has an arc length of α°, i.e. 180° for a half ring, 90° for a quarter ring, etc. The number of such partial rings required to form a complete circle would be 360/α. The number of holes in such a theoretical circle (N) equals n(360/α). One would then use the number of holes for the theoretical complete ring (N) in the equations set forth above to define the hole positions needed to form the requisite partial plate.

In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, a plate can include holes corresponding to more than one diameter within a given system. As noted above each system is defined by the hole spacing. An example is illustrated in FIG. 10 using the system defined above in Table I. The plate 2 includes two sets of holes 8. The first set 38 includes sixty (60) holes equally spaced (lchord−0.5 inch) along circle 10. As indicated above in Table I, the diameter of circle 10 is 9.5537 inches, and the radius r1=4.7769 inches. The second set of holes 40 consists of six groups of three holes, i.e. six partial plates. These hole are spaced along the next highest diameter within the system. Therefore, the diameter of circle 36 is 10.5082 and the radius r2=5.2541. Multiple diameter plates, such as shown in FIG. 10 are very useful. In such plates, the struts can be attached at one diameter, using for example hole set 40, and the accessories can be attached using the other diameters, using for example hole set 38.

It is important to emphasize that although the present invention is described in terms of accessory holes and strut holes, other attachment mechanisms can be used and still fall within the scope of the present invention. For example, each hole could be replaced with a peg that would facilitate attachment of a strut or accessory. Alternatively, an illustrated in FIG. 11, the plate 42 could include one continuous circular grove 44 that traces circle 10. Clamps 46 could be provided that attach to the groove 44 at any location. Such clamps 46 can easily be positioned to mimic the hole patterns described above. Indeed, such a plate 42 could included indicia such as markings 48 or etches 50 within the plate, that designate the hole positions described above.

The unique hole placement scheme described herein provides a number of advantages over the prior art. In particular, a ring that has 2×3 symmetry substantially simplifies the manufacturing process and the fixator construction process. With 2×3 symmetrical rings, one ring can serve as either the upper ring or the lower ring. As a result, a manufacturer need only make half as many ring designs for a system. In addition, if a surgeons using the device want to attach additional rings to the base Taylor Spatial Frame™ fixator, they need not overly concern themselves with having the proper ring, nor the proper orientation of the ring.

Key advantages also result from having a defined relationships between the various holes on a plate, and a defined relationship between various holes on different plates. In general, this facilitates the use of mathematical methods to analyze a fixation system, and determine the proper mode for correcting a deformity. From a clinical standpoint, it gives a surgeon a great deal of flexibility and aids in preoperative planning and surgical application of the device. For example, in cases of sever deformities the various bone fragments are completely out of alignment. In such cases it is difficult for a surgeon to place various plates with the same orientation on the various fragments. With the current invention, a surgeon when attaching the device can place reference wires at the same predetermined anatomical position on each unaligned bone fragment. One the surgeon determines the appropriate positioning of the first plate on the first bone fragment, the first plate is secured to the reference wire. Subsequent plates can then be easily positioned on the remaining bone fragments. A surgeon would attached the subsequent plates to the reference wires on the remaining fragments using the accessory holes at the same locations used with the first plate. The various plates would then be aligned after the correction is made. Such strategic placement of plates relative to one another facilitates the use of the unique method of using the Taylor Spatial FRAME™ fixator. Moreover, this provides an easy gauge during the course of the correction that allows the surgeon to judge if the correction is accurate or needs adjustment. Indeed, if the plate holes are not moving into alignment, the surgeon knows that an adjustment is needed. Furthermore, once the plates have returned to their neutral positions, with the holes in the upper and lower plates are perfectly aligned, and a surgeon can simply insert horizontal rods. Such rods could provide accessory stabilization if required.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US1308799Feb 24, 1919Jul 8, 1919 Surgical instrument for besetting broken bones
US2055024Aug 7, 1934Sep 22, 1936Bittner Jr Joseph EFracture reducing splint
US2250417Dec 2, 1939Jul 22, 1941Zimmer Mfg CompanyFracture reduction and retention device
US2391537Sep 27, 1943Dec 25, 1945Roger AndersonAmbulatory rotating reduction and fixation splint
US2487989Aug 20, 1945Nov 15, 1949Grinnell CorpEye bolt
US3176805Mar 25, 1963Apr 6, 1965Newport News S & D CoUniversal boom heel support
US3727610Feb 17, 1972Apr 17, 1973Riniker PFixator for diaphyses fractures
US3941123May 20, 1975Mar 2, 1976Mstislav Vasilievich VolkovApparatus for joint movement restitution
US3977397 *Nov 27, 1974Aug 31, 1976Kalnberz Viktor KonstantinovicSurgical compression-distraction instrument
US3985127Jun 11, 1975Oct 12, 1976Mstislav Vasilievich VolkovApparatus for surgical treatment of the knee joint
US4033340Dec 9, 1974Jul 5, 1977Kalnberz Viktor KonstantinovicSurgical compression-distraction instrument
US4100919Dec 8, 1976Jul 18, 1978Tsentralny Nauchno-Issledovatelsky Institut Travmatologii I Ortopedii Imeni N.N. PriorovaApparatus for surgical treatment of bones and joints
US4112935Nov 3, 1976Sep 12, 1978Anvar Latypovich LatypovApparatus for surgical treatment of scoliosis
US4127119May 6, 1977Nov 28, 1978Kronner Richard FFracture reducing and joint immobilizing apparatus
US4308863Oct 18, 1979Jan 5, 1982Ace Orthopedic Manufacturing, Inc.External fixation device
US4361144Jun 2, 1980Nov 30, 1982Slaetis Paer E VExternal compression frame for stabilizing unstable pelvic fractures
US4365624Dec 27, 1979Dec 28, 1982Jaquet Orthopedie SaExternal bone-anchoring element
US4482266Oct 19, 1982Nov 13, 1984Tokico Ltd.Ball joint
US4483334Apr 11, 1983Nov 20, 1984Murray William MFor securing bone segments
US4502473Aug 2, 1982Mar 5, 1985National Research Development Corp.Apparatus for external fixation of bone fractures
US4541422Dec 9, 1982Sep 17, 1985Zbikowski JuanFunctional attachment system for osteosynthesis
US4554915Mar 8, 1983Nov 26, 1985Richards Medical CompanyOrthopedic immobilization device
US4570625Oct 19, 1984Feb 18, 1986National Research Development CorporationApparatus for external fixation of bone fractures
US4615338Sep 18, 1985Oct 7, 1986Kurgansky Nauchno-Issledovatelsky Institut Experimentalnoi I Klinicheskoi Ortopedii I TravmatologiiAutomatic compression-distraction apparatus
US4620533Sep 16, 1985Nov 4, 1986Pfizer Hospital Products Group Inc.External bone fixation apparatus
US4624249Feb 4, 1985Nov 25, 1986MedicubaOrthopedic external fixing apparatus
US4628922Sep 27, 1985Dec 16, 1986University College LondonFracture reduction apparatus
US4662365Dec 1, 1983May 5, 1987Ortopedia GmbhDevice for the external fixation of bone fragments
US4768524Feb 20, 1987Sep 6, 1988Hardy Jean MarieDevice for immobilizing a bone structure, especially intended for orthopedic use
US4889111Oct 19, 1987Dec 26, 1989Ben Dov MeirBone growth stimulator
US4928546Aug 17, 1988May 29, 1990Walters David ARobotic devices
US4973331Mar 8, 1989Nov 27, 1990Autogenesis CorporationAutomatic compression-distraction-torsion method and apparatus
US4988244Aug 23, 1990Jan 29, 1991Kearney & TreckerSix-axis machine tool
US5028180Sep 1, 1989Jul 2, 1991Sheldon Paul CSix-axis machine tool
US5062844Sep 7, 1990Nov 5, 1991Smith & Nephew Richards Inc.Method and apparatus for the fixation of bone fractures, limb lengthening and the correction of deformities
US5170790Apr 3, 1991Dec 15, 1992Technomed InternationalArm having an end movable in translation, and therapeutic treatment apparatus constituting an application thereof
US5179525May 1, 1990Jan 12, 1993University Of FloridaMethod and apparatus for controlling geometrically simple parallel mechanisms with distinctive connections
US5180380Jul 6, 1990Jan 19, 1993Autogenesis CorporationAutomatic compression-distraction-torsion method and apparatus
US5209750Oct 11, 1991May 11, 1993Compagnie General De Materiel OrthopediqueExternal holding and reducing brace for bone fractures
US5259710Aug 26, 1991Nov 9, 1993Ingersoll Milling Machine CompanyOctahedral machine tool frame
US5275598Oct 9, 1991Jan 4, 1994Cook Richard LThree dimensional
US5354158Aug 28, 1990Oct 11, 1994Kearney & Trecker CorporationSix axis machine tool
US5372597May 12, 1993Dec 13, 1994Smith & Nephew Richards, Inc.Supination-pronation device
US5388935Aug 3, 1993Feb 14, 1995Giddings & Lewis, Inc.Six axis machine tool
US5405347Feb 12, 1993Apr 11, 1995Zimmer, Inc.Adjustable connector for external fixation rods
US5461515Jul 7, 1992Oct 24, 1995Eastman Kodak CompanyAssembly defining a tetrahedral geometry for mounting an optical element
US5466085Aug 31, 1994Nov 14, 1995Giddings & Lewis, Inc.Pivotable joint
US5490784Oct 29, 1993Feb 13, 1996Carmein; David E. E.Virtual reality system with enhanced sensory apparatus
US5702389Jan 13, 1997Dec 30, 1997Smith & Nephew Richards, Inc.Orthopaedic fixation device
US5728095Oct 7, 1996Mar 17, 1998Smith & Nephew, Inc.Method of using an orthopaedic fixation device
US5776132Dec 26, 1996Jul 7, 1998Blyakher; ArkadyExternal fixation assembly
US5797908Feb 4, 1997Aug 25, 1998Bristol-Myers Squibb CompanyExternal fixator assembly and clamp therefor
US5971984Mar 17, 1998Oct 26, 1999Smith & Nephew, Inc.Method of using an orthopaedic fixation device
US6030386Aug 10, 1998Feb 29, 2000Smith & Nephew, Inc.Six axis external fixator strut
DE2546046A1Oct 14, 1975Apr 21, 1977Woerl Geb Mueller WaltraudKugelgelenk
DE29503147U1Feb 24, 1995Apr 20, 1995Fraunhofer Ges ForschungRingfixateur zur externen Fixierung und Reposition von Knochenfragmenten
DE29514411U1Sep 7, 1995Nov 30, 1995Seide Klaus DrExternes Fixationssystem
EP0589565A2Aug 19, 1993Mar 30, 1994The Ingersoll Milling Machine CompanyOctahedral machine with a hexapodal triangular servostrut section
FR2576774A1 Title not available
FR2756025A1 Title not available
GB108119A Title not available
GB2077847A Title not available
SU820813A1 Title not available
SU1255118A1 Title not available
SU1519673A1 Title not available
WO1991006253A1Oct 30, 1990May 16, 1991Juergen FischerDevice for fixing a bone
WO1992017313A2Apr 6, 1992Oct 6, 1992Geodetic Machines LtdMechanical manipulator
WO1996026678A1Feb 16, 1996Sep 6, 1996Harold S TaylorSpatial frame
Non-Patent Citations
Reference
1 *"Monticelli Spinelli External Fixation Systems," pp. 1-28, Pfizer Hospital Products Group, 1991.
2"The Ilizarov External Fixator, General Surgical Technique Brochure", 1988.
3A.S.A.M.I. Group, "Operative Principles of Ilizarov-Fracture Treatment, Nonunion Osteomyelitis, Lengthening Deforimity Correction," Medi Surgical Video, 1991.
4Catagni, M.A., Malzev, V., Kirienko, A., "Advances in Ilizarov Apparatus Assembly-Fracture Treatment, Pseudarthroses-Lengthening Deformity Correction," Medicalplastic sri. 1994.
5Chen, N., Song, S., "Direct Position Analysis of the 4-6 Stewart Platforms", Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 116, Mar. 1994, pp. 61-66.
6Chironis, Nicholas P., "Mechanisms & Mechanical Devices Sourcebook", pp. 366-367, McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1991.
7Dasgupta, B., Mruthyunjaya, T.S., "A Canonical Formulation Of The Direct Position Kinematics Problem For A General 6-6 Stewart Platform", Mech. Mach. Theory, vol. 29, No. 6, 1994, pp. 819-827.
8Dasgupta, B., Mruthyunjaya, T.S., "Letter To The Editor", Mech. Mach. Theory, vol. 29, No. 2, 1994, p. 341.
9Fenton, R.G., "Response", Mech. Mach. Theory, vol. 29, No. 2, 1994, p. 343.
10Fichter, E.F., "A Stewart Platform-Based Manipulator: General Theory and Practical Construction", International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 157-182.
11Geng, Z.J., Haynes, L.S., "A "3-2-1" Kinematic Configuration Of A Stewart Platform And Its Application to Six Degree Of Freedom Pose Measurements", Robotics & Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, vol. 11, No. 1, 1994, pp. 23-24.
12Hex-Fix Surgical Technique brochure, title page and pp. 1-7.
13Ilizarov, Gavrill A., "Transosseous Osteosynthesis-Theoretical and Clinical Aspects of the Regeneration and Growth of Tissue," Springer-Verlag, 1992.
14Ji, Z., "Dynamics Decomposition for Stewart Platforms", Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 116, Mar. 1994, pp. 67-69.
15Liu, K. Lewis, F.L. Fitzgerald, M., "Solution Of Nonlinear Kinematics Of A Parallel-Link Constrained Stewart Platform Manifulator", Circuita Systems Signal Process, vol. 13, No. 2-3, 1994, pp. 167-183.
16Liu, K., Fitzgerald, J.M., Lewis, F.L., "Kinematic Analysis of a Stewart Platform Manipulator", IEEE Transaction On Industrial Electronics, vol. 40, No. 2, Apr. 1993, pp. 282-293.
17Monticelli Spinelli(R) External Fixation System, cover and pp. 1-28.
18Nair, R., Maddocks, J.H., "On The Forward Kinematics Of Parallel Manipulators", The International Journal of Rototics Research, vol. 13, No. 2, Apr. 1994, pp. 171-188.
19Nanua, P., Waldron, K.J., and Murthy, V., "Direct Kinematic Solution of a Stewart Platform", IEEE Transactions On Robotics And Automation, vol. 6, No. 4, Aug. 1990, pp. 438-443.
20Raghavan, M., "The Stewart Platform of General Geometry Has 40 Configurations", Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 115, Jun. 1993, pp. 277-282.
21Richards Medical Company, Richards External Fixation Systems, 1983, 8 pages.
22Sloughton, R.S., Arai, T., "A Modified Stewart Platform Manipulator With Improved Dexterity", IEEE Transactions On Robotics And Automation, vol. 9, No. 2, Apr. 1993.
23Smith & Nephew Richards Inc., The Original Ilizarov System. The Ilizarov External Fixator General Surgical Technique Brochure, 1988.
24Sreenivasan, S.V., Waldron, K.J., "Closed-Form Direct Displacement Analysis Of A 6-6 Stewart Platform", Mech. Mach Theory, vol. 29, No. 6, 1994, pp. 855-864.
25Techniques In Orthopaedics, Basic Ilizarov Techniques, vol. 5, No. 4, Dec. 1990, 4 pages.
26The Ilizarov Method Bioskills Workshop Handbook, Essential Concepts & Methodology for Application of the Ilizarov Technique, 26 pages.
27Varlax(TM), giddings & Lewis(R) Automation Technology, 4 pages.
28Wen, F., Liang, C., "Displacement Analysis Of The 6-6 Stewart Platform Mechanisms", Mech. Mach Theory, vol. 29, No. 4, 1994, pp. 547-557.
29Wohlhart, K., "Displacement Analysis Of The General Spherical Stewart Platform", Mech. Mach. Theory, vol. 29, No. 4, 1994, pp. 581-589.
30Zhang, C., Song, S., "Forward Position Analysis Of Nealy General Stewart Platforms", Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 116, pp. 54-60, Mar. 1994.
31Zhuang, H., Roth, Z.S., "Method for Kinematic Calibration Of Stewart Platforms", Journal Of Robotic Systems, 10(3), 1993, pp. 391-405.
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US8205445 *Nov 19, 2010Jun 26, 2012GM Global Technology Operations LLCTunable impedance load-bearing structures
US8333766Mar 9, 2010Dec 18, 2012Stryker Trauma SaExternal fixation system
US8448436 *Mar 1, 2012May 28, 2013GM Global Technology Operations LLCTunable impedance load-bearing structures
US8574232Nov 13, 2012Nov 5, 2013Texas Scottish Hospital for ChildrenExternal fixation connection rod for rapid and gradual adjustment
US8641714Dec 8, 2011Feb 4, 2014Stryker Trauma SaClamping pin
US20120161921 *Mar 1, 2012Jun 28, 2012GM Global Technology Operations LLCTunable impedance load-bearing structures
Classifications
U.S. Classification606/56, 606/53, 606/54
International ClassificationA61B17/56, A61B17/62, A61B17/66
Cooperative ClassificationA61B17/66, A61B17/62
European ClassificationA61B17/62
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
Jun 9, 2009ASAssignment
Owner name: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC., TENNESSEE
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:TAYLOR, JOHN CHARLES;TAYLOR, HAROLD S.;REEL/FRAME:022797/0276
Effective date: 19981105