Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUSRE41148 E1
Publication typeGrant
Application numberUS 11/091,010
PCT numberPCT/US1999/024554
Publication dateFeb 23, 2010
Filing dateOct 20, 1999
Priority dateOct 21, 1998
Also published asCA2348090A1, CA2348090C, DE69940673D1, EP1123087A1, EP1123087A4, EP1123087B1, EP1977736A1, US6322819, US6605300, US20010055613, US20030124188, US20040219213, USRE42096, WO2000023055A1, WO2000023055A9
Publication number091010, 11091010, PCT/1999/24554, PCT/US/1999/024554, PCT/US/1999/24554, PCT/US/99/024554, PCT/US/99/24554, PCT/US1999/024554, PCT/US1999/24554, PCT/US1999024554, PCT/US199924554, PCT/US99/024554, PCT/US99/24554, PCT/US99024554, PCT/US9924554, US RE41148 E1, US RE41148E1, US-E1-RE41148, USRE41148 E1, USRE41148E1
InventorsBeth A. Burnside, Xiaodi Guo, Kimberly Fiske, Richard A. Couch, Donald J. Treacy, Rong-Kun Chang, Edward M. Rudnic, Charlotte M. McGuinness
Original AssigneeShire Laboratories, Inc.
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Comprising an immediate-release component and an enteric delayed-release component; amphetamine aspartate and sulfate salts, dextroamphetamine saccharate or sulfate salts; FDA listed patent for Adderall XR 10
US RE41148 E1
Abstract
A multiple pulsed dose drug delivery system for pharmaceutically active amphetamine salts, comprising an immediate-release component and an enteric delayed-release component wherein (1) the enteric release coating has a defined minimum thickness and/or (2) there is a protective layer between the pharmaceutically active amphetamine salt and the enteric release coating and/or (3) there is a protective layer over the enteric release coating. The product can be composed of either one or a number of beads in a dosage form, including either capsule, tablet, or sachet method for administering the beads.
Images(8)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(20)
1. A pharmaceutical formulation for delivery of a mixture of amphetamine base salts effective to treat ADHD in a human patient comprising:
an immediate release dosage form that provides immediate release upon oral administration to said patient;
a delayed enteric release dosage form that provides delayed release upon oral administration to said patient; and
a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier;
wherein said amphetamine base salts comprise dextroamphetamine sulfate, dextroamphetamine saccharate, amphetamine aspartate monohydrate and amphetamine sulfate;
wherein said pharmaceutical formulation is sufficient to maintain an effective level of amphetamine base salts in the patient over the course of at least 8 hours without further administration of amphetamine base salt, and the peak plasma concentration of amphetamine base salts reached after release of said delayed enteric release dosage form exceeds the peak plasma concentration previously reached after release of said immediate release dosage form; and
wherein said pharmaceutical formulation, when containing about a total dose of 20 mg, will produce in a human individual a plasma concentration versus time curve (ng/ml versus hours) having an area under the curve (AUC) of about 467 to about 714 ng hr/ml.
2. A formulation of claim 1 wherein said plasma concentration curve has a maximum concentration (Cmax) of about 22.5 to about 40 ng/ml for about a total dose of 20 mg.
3. A formulation of claim 2 wherein the time after said oral administration to reach said Cmax value is about 7 to about 10 hours.
4. A formulation of claim 1 wherein the time after said oral administration to reach maximum concentration of said plasma concentration curve is about 7 to about 10 hours.
5. A formulation of claim 2, 3 or 4 wherein said AUC is about 714 ng hr/ml.
6. A formulation of claim 3 wherein said AUC is about 714 ng hr/ml, the time after said oral administration to reach said Cmax value is about 7 hours and Cmax is about 40 ng/ml.
7. A formulation of claim 2 wherein Cmax is about 40 ng/ml.
8. A formulation of claim 3 or 4 wherein said time is about 7 hours.
9. A formulation of one of claims 1-4, 6 or 7 wherein said salts are contained in about equal amounts within each of said dosage forms.
10. A formulation of one of claims 1-4, 6 or 7 wherein said delayed enteric release dosage form comprises a coating of a thickness of at leastgreater than 20 μm which comprises dried about 30% (dry substance) aqueous dispersion of an anionic copolymer based on methacrylic acid and acrylic acid ethyl ester, said coating being soluble at a pH of about 5.5 upwards.
11. A formulation of claim 10 wherein said thickness is at least 25 μm.
12. A pharmaceutical formulation for delivery of a mixture of amphetamine base salts effective to treat ADHD in a human patient comprising:
an immediate release dosage form that provides immediate release upon oral administration to said patient;
a delayed enteric release dosage form that provides delayed release upon oral administration to said patient, wherein said enteric release dosage form comprises a coating of a thickness of at leastgreater than 20 μm which comprises dried aqueous dispersion of an anionic copolymer based on methacrylic acid and acrylic acid ethyl ester, said coating being soluble at a pH of about 5.5 upwards; and
a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier;
wherein said amphetamine base salts comprise dextroamphetamine sulfate, dextroamphetamine saccharate, amphetamine aspartate monohydrate and amphetamine sulfate;
wherein said pharmaceutical formulation is sufficient to maintain an effective level of amphetamine base salts in the patient over the course of at least 8 hours without further administration of amphetamine base salt, and the peak plasma concentration of amphetamine base salts reached after release of said delayed enteric release dosage form exceeds the peak plasma concentration of said salts previously reached after release of said immediate release dosage form.
13. A formulation of claim 12 wherein said thickness is at least 25 μm.
14. A formulation of claim 12, wherein said dried aqueous dispersion of an anionic copolymer is a dried about 30% (dry substance) aqueous dispersion of an anionic copolymer.
15. A formulation of claim 1 formulated for a total dose of 20 mg.
16. A formulation of claim 2 formulated for a total dose of 20 mg.
17. A formulation of claim 1 formulated for a total dose different from about 20 mg and having an AUC proportional to said 20 mg AUC.
18. A formulation of claim 2 formulated for a total dose different from about 20 mg and having a Cmax proportional to said 20 mg Cmax.
19. The pharmaceutical formulation of claim 1, wherein the delayed release is pH independent.
20. The pharmaceutical formulation of claim 1, which further comprises a protective coating layer.
Description

This application is a 371 of PCT/US99/24554 filed Oct. 20, 1999, which is continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 09/176,542, filed Oct. 21, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,322,819 the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.

This invention pertains to a multiple dosage form delivery system comprising one or more amphetamine salts for administering the amphetamine salts to a recipient.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Traditionally, drug delivery systems have focused on constant/sustained drug output with the objective of minimizing peaks and valleys of drug concentrations in the body to optimize drug efficacy and to reduce adverse effects. A reduced dosing frequency and improved patient compliance can also be expected for the controlled/sustained release drug delivery systems, compared to immediate release preparations. However, for certain drugs, sustained release delivery is not suitable and is affected by the following factors:

    • First pass metabolism: Some drugs, such as β blockers, β-estradiol, and salicylamide, undergo extensive first pass metabolism and require fast drug input to saturate metabolizing enzymes in order to minimize pre-systemic metabolism. Thus, a constant/sustained oral method of delivery would result in reduced oral bio-availability.
    • Biological tolerance: Continuous release drug plasma profiles are often accompanied by a decline in the pharmacotherapeutic effect of the drug, e.g., biological tolerance of transdermal nitroglycerin.
    • Chronopharmacology and circadian rhythms: Circadian rhythms in certain physiological functions are well established. It has been recognized that many symptoms and onset of disease occur during specific time periods of the 24 hour day, e.g., asthma and angina pectoris attacks are most frequently in the morning hours (1,2).
    • Local therapeutic need: For the treatment of local disorders such as inflammatory bowel disease, the delivery of compounds to the site of inflammation with no loss due to absorption in the small intestine is highly desirable to achieve the therapeutic effect and to minimize side effects.
    • Gastric irritation or drug instability in gastric fluid: For compounds with gastric irritation or chemical instability in gastric fluid, the use of a sustained release preparation may exacerbate gastric irritation and chemical instability in gastric fluid.
    • Drug absorption differences in various gastrointestinal segments: In general, drug absorption is moderately slow in the stomach, rapid in the small intestine, and sharply declining in the large intestine. Compensation for changing absorption characteristics in the gastrointestinal tract may be important for some drugs. For example, it is rational for a delivery system to pump out the drug much faster when the system reaches the distal segment of the intestine, to avoid the entombment of the drug in the feces.

Pulsed dose delivery systems, prepared as either single unit or multiple unit formulations, and which are capable of releasing the drug after a predetermined time, have been studied to address the aforementioned problematic areas for sustained release preparations. These same factors are also problematic in pulsed dose formulations development. For example, gastrointestinal transit times vary not only from patient to patient but also within patients as a result of food intake, stress, and illness; thus a single-unit pulsed-release system may give higher variability compared to a multiple unit system. Additionally, drug layering or core making for multiple unit systems is a time-consuming and hard-to-optimize process. Particularly challenging for formulation scientists has been overcoming two conflicting hurdles for pulsatile formulation development, i.e., lag time and rapid release.

Various enteric materials, e.g., cellulose acetate phtalate, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose phtalate, polyvinyl acetate phthalate, and the EUDRAGIT® acrylic polymers, have been used as gastroresistant, enterosoluble coatings for single drug pulse release in the intestine (3). The enteric materials, which are soluble at higher pH values, are frequently used for colon-specific delivery systems. Due to their pH-dependent attributes and the uncertainty of gastric retention time, in-vivo performance as well as inter- and intra-subject variability are major issues for using enteric, coated systems as a time-controlled release of drugs.

A retarding swellable hydrophilic coating has been used for oral delayed release systems (4,5). It was demonstrated that lag time was linearly correlated with coating weight gain and drug release was pH independent.

Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose barriers with erodible and/or gellable characteristics formed using press coating technology for tablet dosage forms have been described to achieve time-programmed release of drugs (6). Barrier formulation variables, such as grade of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, water-soluble and water-insoluble excipients, significantly altered the lag time and the release rate from the center cores.

Special grades of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, e.g., METHOLOSE® 60SH, 90SH (Shin-Etsu Ltd., Japan), and METHOCEL® F4M (Dow Chemical Company, USA), as a hydrophilic matrix material have been used to achieve bimodal drug release for several drugs, i.e., aspirin, ibuprofen, and adinazolam (7). Bimodal release is characterized by a rapid initial release, followed by a period of constant release, and finalized by a second rapid drug release.

Tablets or capsules coated with a hydrophobic wax-surfactant layer, made from an aqueous dispersion of carnauba wax, beeswax, polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate, and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose have been used for rapid drug release after a predetermined lag time. However, even though a two-hour lag time was achieved for the model drug theophylline at a higher coating level (60%), three hours were required for a complete release of theophylline after the lag time. (8)

A sustained-release drug delivery system is described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,871,549. When this system is placed into dissolution medium or the gastrointestinal tract, water influx and the volume expansion of the swelling agent cause the explosion of the water permeable membrane. The drug thus releases after a predetermined time period. The OROS® push-pull system (Alza Company) has been developed for pulsatile delivery of water-soluble and water-insoluble drugs (9,10), e.g. the OROS-CT® system and is based on the swelling properties of an osmotic core compartment which provides a pH-independent, time-controlled drug release.

The PULSINCAP® dosage form releases its drug content at either a predetermined time or at a specific site (e.g., colon) in the gastrointestinal tract (11). The drug formulation is contained within a water-insoluble capsule body and is sealed with a hydrogel plug. Upon oral administration, the capsule cap dissolves in the gastric juice and the hydrogel plug swells. At a controlled and predetermined time point, the swollen plug is ejected from the PULSINCAP® dosage form and the encapsulated drug is released. A pulsatile capsule system containing captopril with release after a nominal 5-hr period was found to perform reproducibly in dissolution and gamma scintigraphy studies. However, in the majority of subjects, no measurable amounts of the drug were observed in the blood, possibly due to instability of the drug in the distal intestine. (12)

ADDERALL® comprises a mixture of four amphetamine salts, dextroamphetamine sulfate, dextroamphetamine saccharate, amphetamine asparate monohydrate and amphetamine sulfate, which in combination, are indicated for treatment of Attention Deficity Hyperactivity Disorder in children from 3-10 years of age. One disadvantage of current treatment is that a tablet form is commonly used which many young children have difficulty in swallowing. Another disadvantage of current treatment is that two separate dose are administered, one in the morning and one approximately 4-6 hours later, commonly away from home under other than parental supervision. This current form of treatment, therefore, requires a second treatment which is time-consuming, inconvenient and may be problematic for those children having difficulty in swallowing table formulations.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Accordingly, in view of a need for successfully administering a multiple unit pulsed dose of amphetamine salts and mixtures thereof, the present invention provides an oral multiple unit pulsed dose delivery system for amphetamine salts and mixtures thereof. FIG. 1 illustrates the desired target plasma level profile of the pharmaceutical active contained within the delivery system.

In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a pharmaceutical composition for delivering one or more pharmaceutically active amphetamine salts that includes:

    • (a) one or more pharmaceutically active amphetamine salts that are covered with an immediate release coating, and
    • (b) one or more pharmaceutically active amphetamine salts that are covered with an enteric release coating wherein (1) the enteric release coating has a defined minimum thickness and/or (2) there is a protective layer between the at least one pharmaceutically active amphetamine salt and the enteric release coating and/or (3) there is a protective layer over the enteric release coating.

In one embodiment, the immediate release and enteric release portions of the composition are present on the same core.

In another embodiment, the immediate release and enteric release components are present on different cores.

It is also contemplated that the composition may include a combination of the hereinabove referred to cores (one or more cores that include both components on the same core and one or more cores that include only one of the two components on the core).

The present invention provides a composition in which there is immediate release of drug and enteric release of drug wherein the enteric release is a pulsed release and wherein the drug includes one or more amphetamine salts and mixtures thereof.

The immediate release component releases the pharmaceutical agent in a pulsed dose upon oral administration of the delivery system.

The enteric release coating layer retards or delays the release of the pharmaceutical active or drug for a specified time period (“lag time”) until a predetermined time, at which time the release of the drug is rapid and complete, i.e., the entire dose is released within about 30-60 minutes under predetermined environmental conditions, i.e. a particular location within the gastrointestinal tract.

The delay or lag time will take into consideration factors such as transit times, food effects, inflammatory bowel disease, use of antacids or other medicaments which alter the pH of the GI tract.

In a preferred embodiment, the lag time period is only time-dependent, i.e., pH independent. The lag time is preferably within 4 to 6 hours after oral administration of the delivery system.

In one aspect, the present invention is directed to a composition that provides for enteric release of at least one pharmaceutically active amphetamine salt, including at least one pharmaceutically active amphetamine salt that is coated with an enteric coating wherein (1) the enteric release coating has a defined minimum thickness and/or (2) there is a protective layer between the at least one pharmaceutically active amphetamine salt and the enteric release coating and/or (3) there is a protective layer over the enteric release coating.

In attempting to provide for enteric release of an amphetamine salt, applicants found that use of an enteric release coating as generally practiced in the art did not provide effective enteric release.

Typical enteric coating levels did not meet the above requirements for the desired dosage profile of amphetamine salts. Using the typical amount of enteric coating (10-20μ) resulted in undesired premature leakage of the drug from the delivery system into the upper gastrointestinal tract and thus no drug delivery at the desired location in the gastrointestinal tract after the appropriate lag time. Thus this coating did not meet the requirements for the drug release profile to provide full beneficial therapeutic activity at the desired time.

Surprisingly, applicants found that using a thicker application of enteric coating on the formulation allowed for the second pulsed dose to be released only and completely at the appropriate time in the desired predetermined area of the gastrointestinal tract, i.e., in the intestine.

This was surprising because an increase in thickness of about 5-10μ of enteric coatings above a minimum thickness of about 10-20μ typically does not have a significant effect on release of drug from within such coatings. Enteric coatings typically are pH dependent and will only dissolve/disperse when exposed to the appropriate environment. Typically, application of a thicker coating (greater than 20μ) will only marginally increase the time for complete release at the appropriate environmental condition i.e., for a brief period of time (20 minutes). Using the typical coating, applicants could not achieve the desired result—rather, the coating leaked before the predetermined time in an inappropriate environment resulting in significant loss of the therapeutic agent.

Accordingly, in one aspect, the pulsed enteric release of the amphetamine salts is accomplished by employing a certain minimum thickness of the enteric coating.

In one embodiment of the invention, the pulsed dose delivery comprises a composition which comprises one or more pharmaceutically active amphetamine salts; an enteric coating over the one or more pharmaceutically active amphetamine salts, wherein the thickness of the enteric coating layer is at least 25μ; a further layer of one or more pharmaceutically active amphetamine salts over the enteric coating layer; and an immediate release layer coating. The thicker enteric coating surprisingly provides the required delayed immediate release of the pharmaceutically active amphetamine salt at the desired time in the desired area of the gastrointestinal tract. FIG. 2 illustrates a model of this delivery system.

In this aspect, the one or more pharmaceutically active amphetamine salts can be provided within or as a part of a core seed around which the enteric coating is applied. Alternatively, a core seed can be coated with one or more layers of one or more pharmaceutically active amphetamine salts.

It has further been discovered that a delayed immediate release drug delivery can also be accomplished by coating the drug first with a protective layer prior to applying the enteric coating.

Thus, in another embodiment, the pulsed enteric release is accomplished by employing a protective layer between the drug and the enteric coating. When using a protective coating, the enteric coating may be of an increased thickness or may be of lower thickness.

Thus, in another aspect, the object of the invention is met by providing a composition comprising one or more pharmaceutically active amphetamine salts; a protective layer coating over the one or more pharmaceutically active amphetamine salt layer(s), and an enteric coating layer over the protective coating layer; a further pharmaceutically active amphetamine salt layer and an immediate release layer coating. In a preferred embodiment of this aspect, the thickness of the enteric coating is at least 25μ, and the protective layer comprises an immediate release coating.

With respect to this embodiment of the invention, the one or more pharmaceutically active amphetamine salts can be provided within or as a part of a core seed, during the core seed manufacturing process, around which the protective coating is applied. Alternatively, a core seed can be coated with one or more layers of one or more pharmaceutically active amphetamine salts.

In another embodiment, the pulsed enteric release is accomplished by employing a protective layer over the enteric coating.

Accordingly, in this embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a pulsed dose release drug delivery system comprising one or more pharmaceutically active amphetamine salts; an enteric coating layer over the pharmaceutically active amphetamine salt layer(s); and a protective layer over the enteric coating; a second pharmaceutically active amphetamine salt layer; and an immediate release layer coating.

In one aspect of this embodiment, the protective layer is comprised of one or more components, which includes an immediate release layer and a modifying layer. The modifying layer is preferably comprised of a semi water-permeable polymer. Applicants have surprisingly found that a semi-permeable polymer coating used in combination with an immediate release layer coating provided a delayed pulsed release drug delivery profile when layered over the enteric coating.

Thus, in this embodiment, the protective layer comprises a semi-permeable polymer and an immediate release coating layer. In a preferred embodiment, the modifying layer comprises a first layer of a semi-permeable polymer which is adjacent to the enteric coating layer and a second coating layer over the semi-permeable polymer coating layer comprising an immediate release polymer coating layer.

In one aspect of this embodiment, a semi-permeable polymer, which may comprise a low water-permeable pH-insensitive polymer, is layered onto the outer surface of the enteric layer, in order to obtain prolonged delayed release time. This semi-permeable polymer coating controls the erosion of the pH-sensitive enteric polymer in an alkaline pH environment in which a pH-sensitive polymer will dissolve rapidly. Another pH-sensitive layer may be applied onto the surface of a low water-permeability layer to further delay the release time.

In a still further aspect of the invention, in addition to a protective layer, the composition comprises an acid which is incorporated into the pharmaceutical active layer or coated onto the surface of the active layer to reduce the pH value of the environment around the enteric polymer layer. The acid layer may also be applied on the outer layer of the pH-sensitive enteric polymer layer, followed by a layer of low water-permeability polymer. The release of the active thus may be delayed and the dissolution rate may be increased in an alkaline environment.

In a further embodiment, the protective coating may be used both over the drug and over the enteric coating.

With respect of this embodiment of the invention, the one or more pharmaceutically active amphetamine salts can be provided within or as a part of a core seed, during the core seed manufacturing process, around which the enteric coating is applied. Alternatively, a core seed can be coated with one or more layers of one or more pharmaceutically active amphetamine salts.

The drug delivery system of the present invention as described herein preferably comprises one or a number of beads or beadlets in a dosage form, either capsule, tablet, sachet or other method of orally administering the beads.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 illustrates a multiple pulse drug delivery system target plasma profile of the drug delivery system of the present invention. The profile reflects an immediate-release component followed by a delayed-release component.

FIG. 2a graphically illustrates a pulsed dose delivery system.

FIGS. 2b and c graphically illustrate the drug release mechanism from the proposed delivery system.

FIG. 3 is a plot of the present drug released versus time from the drug-loaded pellets described in Example 1 which exemplifies the immediate release component of the present invention.

FIG. 4 is a plot of the percent drug released versus time from the coated pellets described in Example 2 which exemplifies the immediate release component and the delayed release components of the present invention.

FIG. 5 is a plot of the percent drug released versus time from the coated pellets described in Example 3 which exemplifies the immediate release component and the delayed release components of the present invention.

FIG. 6 illustrates the drug release profile of coated pellets described in Example 4 which exemplifies the immediate release component and the delayed release components of the present invention.

FIG. 7 is a plot of a profile of plasma amphetamine concentration after administration of a composite capsule containing the immediate release pellets and delayed release pellets from Examples 1 and 2, respectively.

FIG. 8 is a plot of a profile of plasma amphetamine concentration after administration of a composite capsule containing the immediate release pellets and delayed release pellets from Examples 1 and 3, respectively.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present invention comprises a core or starting seed, either prepared or commercially available product. The cores or starting seeds can be sugar spheres; spheres made from microcrystalline cellulose and any suitable drug crystals.

The materials that can be employed in making drug-containing pellets are any of those commonly used in pharmaceutics and should be selected on the basis of compatibility with the active drug and the physicochemical properties of the pellets. The additives except active drugs are chosen below as examples.

Binders such as cellulose derivatives such as methylcellulose, hydroxyethyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, polyvinylpyrrolidone, polyvinylpyrrolidone/vinyl acetate copolymer and the like.

Disintegration agents such as corn starch, pregelatinized starch, cross-linked carboxymethylcellulose (AC-DI-SOL®), sodium starch glycolate (EXPLOTAB®), cross-linked polyvinylpyrrolidone (PLASDONE XL®), and any disintegration agents used in tablet preparations.

Filling agents such as lactose, calcium carbonate, calcium phosphate, calcium sulfate, microcrystalline cellulose, dextran, starches, sucrose, xylitol, lactitol, mannitol, sorbitol, sodium chloride, polyethylene glycol, and the like.

Surfactants such as sodium lauryl sulfate, sorbitan monooleate, polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate, bile salts, glyceryl monostearate, PLURONIC® line (BASF), and the like.

Solubilizers such as citric acid, succinic acid, fumaric acid, malic acid, tartaric acid, maleic acid, glutaric acid sodium bicarbonate and sodium carbonate and the like.

Stabilizers such as any antioxidation agents, buffers, acids, and the like, can also be utilized.

Methods of manufacturing the core include

    • a. Extrusion-Spheronization—Drug(s) and other additives are granulated by addition of a binder solution. The wet mass is passed through an extruder equipped with a certain size screen. The extrudates are spheronized in a marumerizer. The resulting pellets are dried and sieved for further applications.
    • b. High-Shear Granulation—Drug(s) and other additives are dry-mixed and then the mixture is wetted by addition of a binder solution in a high shear-granulator/mixer. The granules are kneaded after wetting by the combined actions of mixing and milling. The resulting granules or pellets are dried and sieved for further applications.
    • c. Solution or Suspension Layering—A drug solution or dispersion with or without a binder is sprayed onto starting seeds with a certain particle size in a fluid bed processor or other suitable equipment. The drug thus is coated on the surface of the starting seeds. The drug-loaded pellets are dried for further applications.

For purposes of the present invention, the core particles have a diameter in the range of about 50-1500 microns; preferably 100-800 microns.

These particles can then be coated in a fluidized bed apparatus with an alternating sequence of coating layers.

The core may be coated directly with a layer or layers of at least one pharmaceutically active amphetamine salts and/or the pharmaceutically active amphetamine salt may be incorporated into the core material. Pharmaceutical active amphetamine salts contemplated to be within the scope of the present invention include amphetamine base, all chemical and chiral derivatives and salts thereof; methylphenidate, all chemical and chiral derivatives and salts thereof; phenylpropanolamine and its salts; and all other compounds indicated for the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

A protective layer may be added on top of the pharmaceutical active containing layer and also may be provided between active layers. A separation or protective layer may be added onto the surface of the active-loaded core, and then the enteric layer is coated thereupon. Another active layer may also be added to the enteric layer to deliver an initial dose.

A protective coating layer may be applied immediately outside the core, either a drug-containing core or a drug-layered core, by conventional coating techniques such as pan coating or fluid bed coating using solutions of polymers in water or suitable organic solvents or by using aqueous polymer dispersions. Suitable materials for the protective layer include cellulose derivatives such as hydroxyethyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, polyvinylpyrrolidone, polyvinylpyrrolidone/vinyl acetate copolymer, ethyl cellulose aqueous dispersions (AQUACOAT®, SURELEASE®), EUDRAGIT® RL 30D, OPADRY® and the like. The suggested coating levels are from 1 to 6%, preferably 2-4% (w/w).

The enteric coating layer is applied onto the cores with or without seal coating by conventional coating techniques, such as pan coating or fluid bed coating using solutions of polymers in water or suitable organic solvents or by using aqueous polymer dispersions. All commercially available pH-sensitive polymers are included. The pharmaceutical active is not released in the acidic stomach environment of approximately below pH 4.5, but not limited to this value. The pharmaceutical active should become available when the pH-sensitive layer dissolves at the greater pH, after a certain delayed time; or after the unit passes through the stomach. The preferred delay time is in the range of two to six hours.

Enteric polymers include cellulose acetate phthalate, Cellulose acetate trimellitate, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose phtalate, polyvinyl acetate phtalate, carboxymethylethylcellulose, co-polymerized methacrylic acid/methacrylic acid methyl esters such as, for instance, materials known under the trade name EUDRAGIT® L12.5, L100, or EUDRAGIT® S12.5, S100 or similar compounds used to obtain enteric coatings. Aqueous collodial polymer dispersions or re-dispersions can be also applied, e.g. EUDRAGIT® L 30D-55, EUDRAGIT® L100-55, EUDRAGIT® S100, EUDRAGIT® preparation 4110D (Rohm Pharma); AQUATERIC®, AQUACOAT® CPD 30 (FMC); KOLLICOAT MAE® 30D and 30DP (BASF); EASTACRYL® 30D (Eastman Chemical).

The enteric polymers used in this invention can be modified by mixing with other known coating products that are not pH sensitive. Examples of such coating pro ducts include the neutral methacrylic acid esters with a small portion of trimethylammonioethyl methacrylate chloride, sold currently under the trade names EUDRAGIT® RS and EUDRAGIT® RL; a neutral ester dispersion without any functional groups, sold under the trade names EUDRAGIT® NE30D; and other pH independent coating products.

The modifying component of the protective layer used over the enteric coating can include a water penetration barrier layer (semipermeable polymer) which can be successively coated after the enteric coating to reduce the water penetration rate through the enteric coating layer and thus increase the lag time of the drug release. Sustained-release coatings commonly known to one skilled in the art can be used for this purpose by conventional coating techniques such as pan coating or fluid bed coating using solutions of polymers in water or suitable organic solvents or by using aqueous polymer dispersions. For example, the following materials can be used, but not limited to: Cellulose acetate, Cellulose acetate butyrate, Cellulose acetate propionate, Ethyl cellulose, Fatty acids and their esters, Waxes, zein, and aqueous polymer dispersions such as EUDRAGIT® RS and SURELEASE®, cellulose acetate latex. The combination of above polymers and hydrophilic polymers such as Hydroxyethyl cellulose, Hydroxypropyl cellulose (KLUCEL®, Hercules Corp.), Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (METHOCEL®, Dow Chemical Corp.), Polyvinylpyrrolidone can also be used.

An overcoating layer can further optionally be applied to the composition of the present invention. OPADRY®, OPADRY II® (Colorcon) and corresponding color and colorless grades from Colorcon can be used to protect the pellets from being tacky and provide colors to the product. The suggested levels of protective or color coating are from 1 to 6%, preferably 2-3% (w/w).

Many ingredients can be incorporated into the overcoating formula, for example to provide a quicker immediate release, such as plasticizers: acetyltriethyl citrate, triethyl citrate, acetyltributyl citrate; dibutylsebacate, triacetin, polyethylene glycols, propylene glycol and the others; lubricants: talc, colloidal silica dioxide, magnesium stearate, calcium stearate, titanium dioxide, magnesium silicate, and the like.

The composition, preferably in beadlet form, can be incorporated into hard gelatin capsules, either with additional excipients, or alone. Typical excipients to be added to a capsule formulation include, but are not limited to: filters such as microcrystalline cellulose, soy polysaccharides, calcium phosphate dihydrate, calcium sulfate, lactose, sucrose, sorbitol, or any other inert filler. In addition, there can be flow aids such as fumed silicon dioxide, silica gel, magnesium stearate, calcium stearate or any other material imparting flow to powders. A lubricant can further be added if necessary by using polyethylene glycol, leucine, glyceryl behenate, magnesium stearate or calcium stearate.

The composition may also be incorporated into a tablet, in particular by incorporation into a tablet matrix, which rapidly disperses the particles after ingestion. In order to incorporate these particles into such a tablet, a filler/binder must be added to a table that can accept the particles, but will not allow their destruction during the tableting process. Materials that are suitable for this purpose include, but are not limited to, microcrystalline cellulose (AVICEL®), soy polysaccharide (EMCOSOY®), pre-gelatinized starches (STARCH® 1500, NATIONAL® 1551), and polyethylene glycols (CARBOWAX®). The materials should be present in the range of 5-75% (w/w), with a preferred range of 25-50% (w/w).

In addition, disintegrants are added in order to dispense the beads once the tablet is ingested. Suitable disintegrants include, but are not limited to: cross-linked sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (AC-DI-SOL®), sodium starch glycolate (EXPLOTAB®, PRIMOJEL®), and cross-linked polyvinylpolypyrrolidone (Plasone-XL). These materials should be present in the rate of 3-15% (w/w), with a preferred range of 5-10% (w/w).

Lubricants are also added to assure proper tableting, and these can include, but are not limited to: magnesium stearate, calcium stearate, stearic acid, polyethylene glycol, leucine, glyceryl behanate, and hydrogenated vegetable oil. These lubricants should be present in amounts from 0.1-10% (w/w), with a preferred range of 0.3-3.0% (w/w).

Tablets are formed, for example, as follows. The particles are introduced into a blender along with AVICEL®, disintegrants and lubricant, mixed for a set number of minutes to provide a homogeneous blend which is then put in the hopper of a tablet press with which tablets are compressed. The compression force used is adequate to form a tablet; however, not sufficient to fracture the beads or coatings.

It will be appreciated that the multiple dosage form of the present invention can deliver rapid and complete dosages of pharmaceutically active amphetamine salts to achieve the desired levels of the drug in a recipient over the course of about 8 hours with a single oral administration.

In so doing, the levels of drug in blood plasma of the pharmaceutically active amphetamine salts will reach a peak fairly rapidly after about 2 hours, and after about 4 hours a second pulse dose is released, wherein a second fairly rapid additive increase of plasma drug levels occurs which slowly decreases over the course of the next 12 hours.

The following examples are presented to illustrate and do not limit the invention.

EXAMPLES Example 1 Immediate Release Formulation

The following formulation was used to layer the drug onto sugar spheres. Nonpareil seeds (30/35 mesh, Paulaur Corp., NJ), 6.8 kg were put into a FLM-15 fluid bed processor with a 9″ Wurster column and fluidized at 60° C. The suspension of mixed amphetamine salts (MAS) with 1% HPMC E5 Premium (Dow Chemical) as a binder was sprayed onto the seed under suitable conditions. Almost no agglomeration and no fines were observed with a yield of at least 98%. The drug-loaded cores were used to test enteric coatings and sustained release coatings.

TABLE 1
Ingredients Amount (%)
Nonpareil seed 88.00
mixed amphetamine salts 11.40
METHOCEL ® E5 Premium 0.60
Water *
*removed during processing

The drug release profile of the drug-loaded pellets of this example is shown in FIG. 3.

Example 2

The following formulation was used to coat the mixed amphetamine salts loaded (MASL) pellets from Example 1 with the EUDRAGIT® L 30D-55 (Rohm Pharma, Germany) coating dispersion. 2 kg of MASL pellets were loaded into a fluid bed processor with a reduced Wurster column equipped with a precision coater (MP 2/3, Niro Inc) (see Examples 3 and 4). The coating dispersion was prepared by dispersing Triethyl citrate, Talc and EUDRAGIT® L 30D-55 into water and mixing for at least 30 minutes. Under suitable fluidization conditions, the coating dispersion was sprayed onto the fluidized MASL pellets. The spraying was continued until the targeted coating level was achieved (20 μ) . The coated pellets were dried at 30-35° C. for 5 minutes before stopping the process. The enteric coated PPAMASL pellets were tested at different pH buffers by a USP paddle method. The drug content was analyzed using HPLC. The results showed that the enteric coating delayed the drug release from the coated pellets until after exposure to pH 6 or higher. (Reference #AR98125-4)

TABLE 2
Ingredients Amount (%)
MASL pellets 40.0070.00
EUDRAGIT ® L 30D-55 24.88
Triethyl citrate 2.52
Talc 2.60
Water *
*removed during processing

The drug release profile of the coated pellets of this example is shown in FIG. 4.

Example 3

The following formulation was used to coat the MASL pellets from Example 1 with the EUDRAGIT® 4110D (Rohm Pharma, Germany) coating dispersion. MASL pellets (2 kg) were loaded in a fluid bed processor with a reduced Wurster column (GPGC-15, Glatt). The coating dispersion was prepared by dispersing Triethyl citrate, Talc and EUDRAGIT® 4110D into water and mixing for at least 30 minutes. Under suitable fluidization conditions, the coating dispersion was sprayed onto the fluidized MASL pellets. The spraying was continued until the targeted coating level was achieved. The coated pellets were dried at 30-35° C. for 5 minutes before stopping the process. The enteric coated MASL pellets were tested using a USP paddle method at different pH buffers. The drug content was analyzed using HPLC. The enteric coating delayed the drug release for several hours from the coated pellets until the pH value reached 6.8 or higher, as shown below in Table 3. (Reference #AR98125-3)

TABLE 3
Ingredients Amount (%)
MASL pellets 70.00
EUDRAGIT ® 4110D 26.24
Triethyl citrate 0.76
Talc 3.00
Water *
*removed during processing

The drug release profile of coated pellets of this example is shown in FIG. 5.

Example 4

The following formulation was selected to coat the enteric coated MASL pellets. Coated MASL pellets from Example 2 or coated MASL pellets from Example 3 (2 kg of either) were loaded into a fluid bed processor with a reduced Wurster column (GPGC-15, Glatt). The coating dispersion was prepared by mixing SURELEASE® (Colorcon) and water for at least 15 minutes prior to spraying. Under suitable fluidization conditions, the coating dispersion was sprayed onto the fluidizated pellets. The spraying was continued until the targeted coating level was achieved. The coated pellets were coated with a thin layer of OPADRY® white (Colorcon) (2%) to prevent the tackiness of the coated pellets during storage. The coated pellets were then dried at 35-40° C. for 10 minutes before discharging from the bed. The drug dissolution from both coated pellets was performed using a USP paddle method at different pH buffers. The drug content was analyzed using HPLC. The 8% SURELEASE® coating slightly sustained the drug release from EUDRAGIT® L 30D-55 coated pellets at pH 7.5 buffer, while the SURELEASE® coating delayed the drug release up to 2 hours after the buffer switched from pH 1 to pH 7.5. (Reference ##AR98125-1)

TABLE 4
Ingredients Amount, (%)
Enteric coated MASL pellets 90.00
SURELEASE ® 8.00
OPADRY ® white 2.00
Water *
*removed during processing

The drug release profile of the coated pellets from this example is shown in FIG. 6.

Example 5

A pulsatile delivery system can be achieved by combining the immediate release pellets (Example 1) with delayed release pellets (Example 2 or Example 3). The immediate-release pellets equivalent to half the dose and the delayed-release pellets equivalent to half the dose are filled into a hard gelatin capsule to produce the oral pulsed dose delivery system. The delayed-release portion releases the amphetamine salts rapidly and completely, after a specified lag time. The capsule products containing immediate-release pellets and delayed-release pellets (Example 1 plus Example 2 and Example 1 plus Example 3) were tested in a crossover human study. FIGS. 7 and 8 show the typical profiles of plasma amphetamine concentration after administration of a composite capsule containing the immediate-release pellets and delayed-release pellets from Examples 1 and 2 (10 mg dose each pellet type) and a capsule containing the pellets from immediate-release pellets and delayed-release pellets from Examples 1 and 3 (10 mg dose each pellet type), respectively. The general plasma profiles are similar to the desired target plasma level profile shown in FIG. 1.

It is to be understood, however, that the scope of the present invention is not to be limited to the specific embodiments described above. The invention may be practiced other than as particularly described and still be within the scope of the accompanying claims.

CITED LITERATURE

  • 1. B. Lemmer, “Circadian Rhythms and Drug Delivery”, J. Controlled Release, 16, 63-74 (1991)
  • 2. B. Lemmer, “Why are so may Biological Systems Periodic?” in Pulsatile Drug Delivery: Current Applications and Future Trends, R Gurny, H E Junginger and N A Peppas, eds. (Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft mbH Stuttgart, Germany 1993) pp.11-24
  • 3. X. Xu and P I Lee, “Programmable Drug Delivery from an Erodible Association Polymer System”, Pharm. Res. 10(8), 1144-1152 (1993)
  • 4. A. Gazzaniga, M E Sangalli, and F Giodano, “Oral Chonotropic Drug Delivery Systems: Achievement of Time and/or Site Specificity”, Eur J. Pharm. Biopharm., 40(4), 246-250 (1994)
  • 5. A Gazzaniga, C Busetti, L Moro, M E Sangalli and F Giordano, “Time Dependent Oral Delivery Systems for Colon Targeting”, S.T.P. Pharma Sciences 5(1), 83-88 (1996)
  • 6. U Conte, L Maggi, M L Torre, P Giunchedi and A Lamanna, “Press-coated Tablets for Time programmed Release of Drugs”, Biomaterials, 14(13), 1017-1023 (1993)
  • 7. A C Shah International Patent Application WO87/00044
  • 8. P S Walia, P Jo Mayer Stout and R Turton, “Preliminary Evaluation of an Aqueous Wax Emulsion for Controlled Release Coating”,Pharm Dev Tech, 3(1), 103-113 (1998)
  • 9. F Theeuwes, “OROS® Osmotic System Development”, Drug Dev Ind Pharm 9(7), 1331-1357 (1983)
  • 10. F Theeuwes, “Triggered Pulsed and Programmed Drug Delivery” in Novel Drug Delivery and its Therapeutic Application, L F Prescott and W S Nimmos, eds (Wiley, New York, 1989) pp.323-340
  • 11. M McNeil, A Rashid and H Stevens, International Patent App WO90/09168
  • 12. I R Wilding, S S Davis, M Bakhshaee, H N E Stevens, R A Sparrow and J Brennan, “Gastrointestinal Transit and Systemic Absorption of Captopril from a Pulsed Release Formulation”, Pharm Res 9(5), 654-657 (1992)
Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US2099402Jan 17, 1934Nov 16, 1937Pratt Food CompanyPill or tablet
US2738303Jul 18, 1952Mar 13, 1956Smith Kline French LabSympathomimetic preparation
US3048526Aug 4, 1958Aug 7, 1962Wander CompanyMedicinal tablet
US3365365Aug 9, 1965Jan 23, 1968Hoffmann La RocheRepeat action pharmaceutical compositions in the form of discrete beadlets
US3979349May 1, 1974Sep 7, 1976Rohm GmbhAcrylic ester copolymer
US4049791Jan 26, 1976Sep 20, 1977Delco Chemical Company, Inc.Prolonged acting appetite suppressant and anti-obesity compositions containing amphetamine adipate, dextroamphetamine adipate, amphetamine sulfate and dextroamphetamine sulfate as the active agents
US4723958 *May 23, 1986Feb 9, 1988Merck & Co., Inc.Pulsatile drug delivery system
US4728512Mar 4, 1986Mar 1, 1988American Home Products CorporationFormulations providing three distinct releases
US4765989 *Sep 2, 1986Aug 23, 1988Alza CorporationSemipermeable material surrounds compartment
US4794001Sep 24, 1987Dec 27, 1988American Home Products CorporationCapsules containing spheroids or powders; coated and uncoated
US4871549 *Jul 10, 1986Oct 3, 1989Fujisawa Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.Time-controlled explosion systems and processes for preparing the same
US4891230 *Nov 16, 1987Jan 2, 1990Elan Corporation PlcDiltiazem formulation
US4894240 *Nov 16, 1987Jan 16, 1990Elan Corporation PlcCores, membranes, multilayer, time-release agents
US4902516 *Apr 6, 1988Feb 20, 1990Chemie Holding AktiengesellschaftWith coating of poly-3-hydroxybutyrolactone; drug delivery
US4917899 *Nov 16, 1987Apr 17, 1990Elan Corporation PlcOral administration, time release agent;
US5002776 *Nov 18, 1988Mar 26, 1991Elan Corporation, PlcMultilayer polymeric membrane
US5011692 *Dec 23, 1986Apr 30, 1991Sumitomo Pharmaceuticals Company, LimitedPolymer layers with and without drug disposed alternatingly and coated with insoluble polymer; for embedding beneath skin
US5011694 *Aug 1, 1989Apr 30, 1991Rohm GmbhExposing matrix of compressed mixture of powdered drug and polymer to vapor of lower alcohol
US5051262 *Nov 18, 1986Sep 24, 1991Elan Corp., P.L.C.Processes for the preparation of delayed action and programmed release pharmaceutical forms and medicaments obtained thereby
US5093200 *Sep 30, 1988Mar 3, 1992Eisai Co., Ltd.Multilayer sustained release granule
US5137733Jun 28, 1991Aug 11, 1992Tanabe Seiyaku Co., Ltd.Controlled release pharmaceutical preparation
US5202159Dec 31, 1990Apr 13, 1993Standard Chemical & Pharmaceutical Corp., Ltd.Preparation method of microdispersed tablet formulation of spray-dried sodium diclofenac enteric-coated microcapsules
US5226902 *Jul 30, 1991Jul 13, 1993University Of UtahPulsatile drug delivery device using stimuli sensitive hydrogel
US5229131 *Oct 7, 1991Jul 20, 1993University Of MichiganDivided dosage
US5260068May 4, 1992Nov 9, 1993Anda Sr Pharmaceuticals Inc.Multiparticulate pulsatile drug delivery system
US5260069Nov 27, 1992Nov 9, 1993Anda Sr Pharmaceuticals Inc.Water-disintegratable capsule containing pellet populations which release drugs by bursting at different times after environmental contact, pellets containing core with drug and swelling agent, frangible water-permeable membrane around core
US5275819 *Apr 26, 1991Jan 4, 1994Amer Particle Technologies Inc.Drug loaded pollen grains with an outer coating for pulsed delivery
US5312388 *Jan 31, 1992May 17, 1994Wong Patrick S LOsmotic device for delayed delivery of agent
US5364620 *Jul 28, 1992Nov 15, 1994Elan Corporation, PlcControlled absorption diltiazem formulation for once daily administration
US5378474Feb 22, 1993Jan 3, 1995F. H. Faulding & Co. LimitedSustained release pharmaceutical composition
US5395628 *Apr 13, 1992Mar 7, 1995Tanabe Seiyaku Co., Ltd.Controlled release succinic acid microcapsules coated with aqueous acrylics
US5407686 *Jan 29, 1992Apr 18, 1995Sidmak Laboratories, Inc.Sustained release composition for oral administration of active ingredient
US5411745May 25, 1994May 2, 1995Euro-Celtique, S.A.Powder layer beads for sustained release analgesics
US5422121Aug 16, 1993Jun 6, 1995Rohm GmbhDecompsable polysaccharide shell surrounding drug with film-forming cationic acrylic polymer
US5474786 *Oct 6, 1994Dec 12, 1995Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationMultilayered controlled release pharmaceutical dosage form
US5496561Aug 24, 1994Mar 5, 1996Ss Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.Time-release agents for drugs from membrane layers of polymers
US5541170Mar 10, 1995Jul 30, 1996Tillotts Pharma AgOrally administrable pharmaceutical compositions
US5616345 *Nov 4, 1994Apr 1, 1997Elan Corporation PlcPelletizing the powder drug for sustained release
US5618559May 19, 1995Apr 8, 1997G.D. Searle & Co.Method of making modified-release metronidazole compositions
US5733575Oct 7, 1994Mar 31, 1998Bpsi Holdings, Inc.Dry powder mixture of polymer, detackifier, viscosity modifier, alkalizing agent, solid and liquid plasticizers, lubricant, anticaking agent and pigment, for coating drug tablets
US5800836 *Feb 6, 1995Sep 1, 1998F. H. Faulding & Co. LimitedPelletized pharmaceutical composition
US5824341 *Aug 11, 1995Oct 20, 1998Pharma PassComposition providing selective release of an active ingredient
US5824342 *Apr 9, 1996Oct 20, 1998Fuisz Technologies Ltd.Flash flow formed solloid delivery systems
US5824343 *Apr 11, 1994Oct 20, 1998Pharmaceutical Delivery SystemsBioerodible polymers, compositions and therapeutic method
US5837284 *Jul 14, 1997Nov 17, 1998Mehta; Atul M.Oral dosage form of dl-threo methylphenidate hydrochloride; daily dosage; includes ammonio methacrylate polymer
US5840329 *May 15, 1997Nov 24, 1998Bioadvances LlcGroups of particles having distinct pattern of drug release based on combination of controlled release layers, swelling agents and coatings; controlled release layer of slightly crosslinked polyacrylic acid and water soluble polymer
US5885616 *Aug 18, 1997Mar 23, 1999Impax Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Sustained release drug delivery system suitable for oral administration
US5885998 *Feb 12, 1998Mar 23, 1999Bencherif; MerouaneAdministering an effective amount of an aryl subsistituted aliphatic compound, an aryl substituted olefinic amine compound or an aryl substituted acetylenic compound such as 4-(5-pyrimidinyl)-3-butene-1-amine
US5891474 *Jan 29, 1997Apr 6, 1999Poli Industria Chimica, S.P.A.Administering a pharmaceutical formulation comprising a core including the pharmaceutically active agent to be delivered, and a swellable polymeric coating layer substantially surrounding the core
US6322819Oct 21, 1998Nov 27, 2001Shire Laboratories, Inc.Amphetamine salt covered with enteric release coating
US6605300Oct 20, 1999Aug 12, 2003Shire Laboratories, Inc.Oral pulsed dose drug delivery system
US6749867Nov 21, 2001Jun 15, 2004Joseph R. RobinsonDrug-containing core surrounded by inert time-release coating that delays release of drug from core until expiration of a certain time period
US6764696Mar 18, 2003Jul 20, 2004Cima Labs Inc.Effervescent drug delivery system for oral administration
US20040059002Jan 29, 2003Mar 25, 2004Shire Laboratories, Inc.Sustained release delivery of amphetamine salts
AU109438A Title not available
EP0640337A2Aug 25, 1994Mar 1, 1995Ss Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.Controlled release-initiation and controlled release-rate pharmaceutical composition
JPH0761922A Title not available
JPH1081634A Title not available
JPH03148215A Title not available
JPH09249557A Title not available
JPH09267035A Title not available
JPS5982311A Title not available
WO1987000044A1 *Jun 18, 1986Jan 15, 1987Upjohn CoTherapeutic formulations with bimodal release characteristics
WO1990009168A1 *Feb 15, 1990Aug 17, 1990Nat Res DevDispensing device
WO1997003673A1Jul 15, 1996Feb 6, 1997Chiroscience LtdSustained-release formulation of d-threo-methylphenidate
WO1998014168A2Sep 16, 1997Apr 9, 1998Alza CorpDosage form providing a sustained and ascending drug release
WO1999003471A1Jun 9, 1998Jan 28, 1999Dariani Maghsoud MImproved delivery of multiple doses of medications
WO2000025752A1Nov 1, 1999May 11, 2000Church Marla JMultiparticulate modified release composition
WO2000035450A1Dec 17, 1999Jun 22, 2000Darke AndrewControlled/modified release oral methylphenidate formulations
Non-Patent Citations
Reference
1Actavis Elizabeth LLC's Supplemental Responses to Plaintiff Shire LLC's Interrogatory Nos. 5 and 6 in Shire LLC v. Colony Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, Civil Action No. 1:07-cv-00718-CCB, Nov. 14, 2007.
2Adderall XR Package Inset, Sep. (2004).
3Agyilirah GA and Bauker SB, Polymers for Enteric Coating Applications, Polymers for Controlled Drug Delivery (Peter J. Tarcha ed. 1991) 39-66.
4Amendment dated Sep. 24, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/091,011.
5American Chemical Society, Polymer Preprints, pp. 633-634, vol. 34, No. 1, Mar. 1993.
6Angrist et al., Early Pharmacokinetics and Clinical Effects of Oral D-Amphetamine in Normal Subjects, Biol. Psychiatry 1987, 22: 1357-1368.
7Ansel et al., Rate Controlled Dosage Forms and Drug Delivery Systems, Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms and Drug Delivery Systems, 6th Ed. (1995), 213-222.
8Answer and Counterclaims in Shire Laboratories v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Case No. 2:06-cv-00952-SD, Jul. 24, 2006.
9Answer and Counterclaims in Shire Laboratories, Inc. and Shire, LLC v. Andrx Pharmaceuticals, LLC, et al., in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Case No. 07-22201-CIV-Cooke/Brown, Aug. 31, 2007.
10Answering Expert Report of Dr. Alexander Klibanov, Apr. 25, 2005.
11Answering Expert Report of Robert Langer, Apr. 25, 2005.
12Barr Laboratores' Memorandum In Support of its Motion to Amend its Pleadings and exhibits thereto.
13 *Barr Laboratories' Answer. Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaim in Case No. 03-CV-1219(VM)(DFE) (S D N Y ) 2003.
14Barr Laboratories' Inc.'s Objections and Responses to Shire laboratories Inc.'s Second Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 8-11).
15Barr Laboratories' Objections and Responses to Plaintiff Shire Laboratories Inc.'s Fifth Set of Interrogatories (No. 17).
16Barr Laboratories' Objections and Responses to Plaintiff Shire Laboratories Inc.s' Fourth Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 15-16).
17Barr Laboratories' Supplemental Objections and Responses to Plaintiff Shire Laboratories Inc.'s Third Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 12-14 Redacted).
18 *Barr's Paragraph IV Certification against Parent U S Patent 6,322,819 on Jan. 14, 2003.
19Bauer, et al., Cellulose Acetate Phthalate (CAP) and Trimellitate (CAT), Coated Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms (1998), 102-104.
20Bodmeier et al., The Influence of Buffer Species and Strength on Dittiazem HCl Release from Beads Coated with the Aqueous Cationic Polmer Dispersions, Eudraglt RS, RL 30D, Pharmaceutical Research vol. 13, No. 1, 1996, 52-56.
21Brauer et al., Acute Tolerance to Subjective but not Cardiovascular Effects of d-Amphetamine in Normal, Healthy Men, Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology, 1996; 16(1):72-76.
22Brown et al., Behavior and Motor Activity Response in Hyperactive Children and Plasma Amphetamine Levels Following a Sustained Release Preparation, Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 19:225-239, 1980.
23Brown et al., Plasma Levels of d-Amphetamine in Hyperactive Children, Psychopharmacology 62, 133-140, 1979.
24Burns et al., A Study of Enteric-coated Liquid-filled Hard Gelatin Capsules with Biphasic Release Characteristics, International Journal of Pharmaceutics 110 (1994) 291-296.
25Burnside Deposition Transcript, Feb. 2, 2005.
26Burnside Deposition Transcript, Feb. 3, 2005.
27C. Lin et al., Bioavailability of d-pseudoephedrine and Azatadine from a Repeat Action Tablet Formulation, J Int Med Res (1982), 122-125.
28C. Lin et al., Compartive Bioavailability of d-pseudoephedrine from a Conventional d-pseudoephedrine Sulfate Tablet and from a Repeat Action Tablet, J Int Med Res (1982) 10, 126-128.
29Chan, Materials Used for Effective Sustained-Release Products, Proceedings of the International Symposium held on Jan. 29-31, 1987 (The Bombay College of Pharmacy 1988), 69-84.
30Chan, New Polymers for Controlled Release Products, Controlled Release Dosage Forms Proceedings of the International Symposium held on Jan. 29-31, 1987 (The Bombay College of Pharmacy 1988) 59-111.
31Chang Deposition Transcript, Jan. 20, 2005.
32Chang Deposition Transcript, Sep. 8, 2004.
33Chang et al., Preparation and Evaluation of Shellac Pseudolatex as an Aqueous Enteric Coating Systems for Pellets, International Journal of Pharmaceuticals, 60 (1990) 171-173, 1990.
34Charles S.L. Chiao and Joseph R. Robinson, Sustained-Release Drug Delivery Systems, Remington: The Science and Practice of Pharmacy, Tenth Edition (1995) 1660-1675.
35Chaumeil et al., Enrobages gastro-resistants a l'acetophtalate de cellulose, Annales Pharmaceutiques Francaises, 1973, No. 5, pp. 375-384.
36Cody et al., Amphetamine Enantiomer Excretion Profile Following Administration of Adderall, Journal of Analytical Toxicology, vol. 2, Oct. 2003, 485-492.
37Colony Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s Amended Responses to Plaintiff Shire LLC's Interrogatories (Nos. 1-7) in Shire LLC v. Colony Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, Civil Action No. 1:07-cv-00718-CCB, Jun. 5, 2007.
38Colony Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s Responses to Plaintiff Shire LLC's Interrogatories (Nos. 1-7) in Shire LLC v. Colony Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, Civil Action No. 1:07-cv-00718-CCB, May 29, 2007.
39Colony Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s Supplemental Responses to Plaintiff Shire LLC's Interrogatory Nos. 2-4 and 7 in Shire LLC v. Colony Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, Civil Action No. 1:07-cv-00718-CCB, Sep. 5, 2007.
40Complaint for Declaratory Judgment, Impax Laboratories, Inc. v. Shire International Laboratories, Inc. (Civ. Action No. 05772) and Exhibits attached thereto.
41Complaint in Shire Laboratories v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., and exhibits thereto, Case No. 2:06-cv-00952-SD, Mar. 2, 2006.
42 *Conte, et al., Biomaterials, vol. 14, No. 13, pp. 1017-1023 (1993), Press-coated tablets for time-programmed release of drugs.
43Corrected Expert Report of Vladimir P. Torchilin, Ph.D. D.Sc. Regarding the Invalidity of U.S. Patent No. 6,605,300 in Shire LLC v. Colony Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, Civil Action No. 1:07-cv-00718-CCB, Dec. 21, 2007.
44Couch Deposition Transcript, Sep. 14, 2004.
45Court Docket for Shire Laboratories v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Case No. 2:06-cv-00952-SD, Jan. 8, 2007.
46Daynes, Treatment of Noctural Enuresis with Enteric-Coated Amphetamine, The Practitioner, No. 1037, vol. 173, Nov. 1954.
47Defendant Sandoz, Inc.'s Answers and Objections to Plaintiff Shire LLC's Interrogatories (Nos. 1-9), in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, Case No. 07-CV-00197-EWN-CBS, Jun. 18, 2007.
48Defendant Sandoz, Inc.'s Answers and Objections to Plaintiff Shire LLC's Second Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 10-19), in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, Case No. 07-CV-00197-EWN-CBS, Nov. 20, 2007.
49Defendant Sandoz, Inc.'s Answers and Objections to Plaintiff Shire LLC's Third Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 20-25) and Supplement to Answers to Interrogatories 8 and 9, in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, Case No. 07-CV-00197-EWN-CBS, Dec. 10, 2007.
50Defendants' Response to Plaintiff Shire's First Set of Interrogatories (1-12) in Shire Labatories v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Case No. 2:06-cv-00952-SD, Sep. 20, 2006.
51Defendants' Responses to Plaintiff Shire's Second Set of Interrogatories (No. 13) in Shire Laboratories v. Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd., Case No. 2:06-cv-00952-SD, Nov. 8, 2006.
52Defendants' Responses to Plaintiff's First Set of Request for the Production of Documents and Things (1-70) in Shire Laboratories v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Case No. 2:06-cv-00952-SD, Oct. 4, 2006.
53Defendants' Responses to Plaintiff's Second Set of Requests for the Production of Documents and Things (71-80) in Shire Laboratories v. Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd., Case No. 2:06-cv-00952-SD, Nov. 8, 2006.
54Deposition transcript of Honorable Gerald J. Mossinghoff and exhibits thereto.
55Edward Stempel, Prolonged Drug Action, HUSA's Pharmaceutical Dispensing, Sixth Edition, 1966, 464, 481-485.
56Exh. 10, Excerpts from the Deposition Transcript of Xiaodi Guo, dated Jan. 24, 2005.
57Exh. 11, Excerpts from the Deposition Transcript of Xiaodi Guo, dated Jul. 26, 2004.
58Exh. 12, Excerpts from the Deposition Transcript of Edward Rudnic, dated Jul. 28, 2004.
59Exh. 13, Excerpts from the Deposition Transcript of Richard Rong-Kun Chang, dated Jan. 20, 2005.
60Exh. 14, Impax Laboratories Answer And Affirmative Defenses Shire Laboratories, Inc. v. Impax Laboratories, Inc., Civil Action No. 03-CV-01164-GMS.
61Exh. 15, Barr Laboratories' Amended Answer, Affirmative Defenses, And Counterclaims, Shire Laboratories, Inc. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc., Civil Action No. 03-CV-6632-PKC.
62Exh. 16, Barr Laboratories' Amended Answer, Affirmative Defenses And Counterclaims, Shire Laboratories, Inc. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc., Civil Action No. 03-CV-1219-PKC.
63Exh. 17, Reply to Barr Laboratories Inc.'s Amended Answer, Affirmative Defenses And Counterclaims, Shire Laboratories, Inc. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc., Civil Action No. 03-CV-6632-PKC.
64Exh. 18, Civil Docket For Case #: 1:03-cv-01164-GMS, Shire Laboratories, Inc. v. Impax Laboratories, Inc., Civil Action No. 03-CV-01164-GMS.
65Exh. 19, Civil Docket For Case #: 1:05-cv-00020-GMS, Shire Laboratories, Inc. v. Impax Laboratories, Inc., Civil Action No. 05-20-GMS.
66Exh. 20, Civil Docket For Case #: 1:03-cv-06632-VM-DFE, Shire Laboratories, Inc. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc., Civil Action No. 03-CV-6632-PKC.
67Exh. 21, Civil Docket For Case #: 1:03-cv-01219-PKC-DFE, Shire Laboratories, Inc. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc., Civil Action No. 03-CV-1219-PKC.
68Exh. 25, Barr Laboratories, Inc.'s '819 Notification Pursuant to § 505(j)(B)(ii) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. § 355(j)(2)(B)(ii) and 21 C.F.R. § 314.95.
69Exh. 26, Barr Laboratories, Inc.'s '300 Notification Pursuant to § 505(j)(2)(B)(ii) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. § 355(j)(2)(B)(ii) and 21 C.F.R. § 314.95).
70Exh. 27, Order Construing The Terms Of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,322,819 and 6,605,300, Shire Laboratories, Inc. v. Impax Laboratories, Inc., Civil Action No. 03-CV-01164-GMS.
71Exh. 3, Excerpts from the Deposition Transcript of Richard Chang, dated Sep. 8, 2004.
72Exh. 4, Excerpts from the Deposition Transcript of Richard A. Couch, dated Sep. 14, 2004.
73Exh. 5, Excerpts from the Deposition Transcript of Kimberly Fiske, dated Sep. 17, 2004.
74Exh. 6, Excerpts from the Deposition Transcript of Charlotte M. McGuiness, dated Aug. 6, 2004.
75Exh. 7, Excerpts from the Deposition Transcript of Beth Burnside, dated Feb. 2, 2005.
76Exh. 8, Excerpts from the Deposition Transcript of Donald John Treacy, Jr., dated Aug. 31, 2004.
77Exh. 9, Excerpts from the Deposition Transcript of Beth Burnside, dated Feb. 3, 2005.
78Expert Report of Arthur J. Steiner in Shire LLC v. Colony Pharmaceuticals, Inc., in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, Case No. 1:07-cv-00718, Dec. 20, 2007.
79Expert Report of Dr. Joseph R. Robinson and exhibits thereto, Feb. 28, 2005.
80Expert Report of Harry G. Brittain, Ph.D. FRSC in Shire LLC v. Colony Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, Civil Action No. 1:07-cv-00718-CCB and exhibits thereto, Dec. 19, 2007.
81Expert Report of the Honorable Gerald J. Mossinghoff and exhibits thereto, Mar. 16, 2005.
82Expert Report of Vladimir P. Torchilin, Ph.D., D.Sc. Regarding the Invalidity of U.S. patent No. 6,605,300 in Shire LLC v. Colony Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, Civil Action No. 1:07-cv-00718-CCB and exhibits thereto, Dec. 20, 2007.
83Fiske Deposition Transcript, Sep. 17, 2004.
84Freedom of Information Request Results for-Dexadrine (SmithKline Beecham): May 20, 1976 Disclosable Approval Information.
85Freedom of Information Request Results for—Dexadrine (SmithKline Beecham): May 20, 1976 Disclosable Approval Information.
86Fukumori, Coating of Multiparticulates Using Polymeric Dispersions, Multiparticulate Oral Drug Delivery (Swarbrick and Selassie eds. 1994), 79-110.
87Garnett et al., Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Twice-Daily Extended-Release Carbamazepine (CBZ) and Four-Times- Daily Immediate-Release CBZ in Patients with Epilepsy, Epilepsia 39(3):274-279, 1998.
88 *Gazzaniga, et al., Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm., vol. 40, No. 4, pp. 246-250 (1994), Oral Chronotopic Drug Delivery System: Achievement of Time and/or Site Specificity.
89 *Gazzaniga, et al., S.T.P. Pharma Sciences, vol. 5, No. 1, gs. 83-88 (1995), Time dependent oral delivery for colon targeting.
90Ghebre-Sellassie et al., "Evaluation of acrylic-based modified-release film coatings," International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 1987;37:211-218.
91Glatt, The World of the Fluid Bed, Fluid Bed Systemsm, 1-19.
92Goodhart et al., An Evaluation of Aqueous Film-forming Dispersions for Controlled Release, Pharmaceutical Technology, Apr. 1984.
93Greenhill et al., A Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Study Comparing a Single Morning Dose of Adderall to Twice-Daily Dosing in Children with ADHD. J. Am. Acad. Adolesc. Psychiatry, 42:10, Oct. 2003.
94Guidance for Industry: Extended Release Oral Dosage Forms: Development, Evaluation, and Application of In Vitro/In Vivo Correlations (1997).
95Guidance for Industry: Food-Effect Bioavailability and Fed Bioequivalence Studies (2002).
96Guidance for Industry: SUPAC-MR: Modified Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms (1997).
97Guo Deposition Transcript, Jan. 24, 2005.
98Guo Deposition Transcript, Jul. 26, 2004.
99Hall HS and Pondell RE, Controlled Release Technologies: Methods, Theory, and Applications, pp. 133-154 (Agis F. Kydonieus ed. 1980).
100Handbook of Pharmaceutical Excipients: Ethylcellulose, Polymethacrylates, (4th ed. (2003), 237-240, 462-468.
101Handbook of Pharmaceutical Excipients: Plymethacrylates, (2nd ed. 1994), 361-366.
102Hans-Martin Klein & Rolf W. Gunther, Double Contrast Small Bowel Follow-Through with an Acid-Resistant Effervescent Agent, Investigative Radiology vol. 28, Jul. 1993.
103Harrington Deposition Transcript, Jul. 27, 2005.
104Harris et al., Aqueous Polymeric Coating for Modified-Release Pellets, Acqueous Polymeric Coating for Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms (McGinity ed., 1989).
105Holt, Bioequivalence Studies of Ketoprofen: Product formulation, Pharmacokinetics, Deconvolution, and In Vitro - In Vivo correlations, Thesis submitted to Oregon State University, Aug. (1997).
106Husson et al., Influence of Size Polydispersity on Drug Release from Coated Pellets, International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 86 (1992) 113-121, 1992.
107Impax Laboratories, Inc.'s First Amended Answer and Affirmative Defenses.
108Impax Laboratories, Inc.'s First Supplemental Responses to Shire Laboratories Inc.'s First Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 11-12).
109Impax Laboratories, Inc.'s Memorandum in Support of the Motion to Amend its Answer dated Feb. 25, 2005 and exhibits thereto.
110Impax Laboratories, Inc.'s Reply Memorandum in Support of the Motion to Amend its Answer dated Mar. 18, 2005 and exhibits thereto.
111Ishibashi et al., Design and Evaluatin of a New Capsule-type Dosage Form for Colon-Targeted Delivery of Drugs, International Journal of Pharmaceutics 168, (1998) 31-40, 1998.
112J. Sjogren, Controlled release oral formulation technology, Rate Control in Drug Therapy, (1985) 38-47.
113Jarowski, The Pharmaceutical Pilot Plant, Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms: Tablets, vol. 3, 2nd Ed. (1990), 303-367.
114Judgement and Order of Permanent Injunction in Shire LLC v. Teva Pharmaceutical in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Civil Action No. 06-952-SD, Mar. 6, 2008.
115Judgment and Order of Permanaent Injunction in Shire LLC v. Colony Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, Civil Action No. 1:07-cv-00718-CCB, Apr. 14, 2008.
116Judgment and Order of Permanent in Shire Laboratories, Inc. and Shire, LLC v. Andrx Pharmaceuticals, LLC, et al., In the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Miami Division, Case No. 07-22201-CIV-Cooke/Brown, Nov. 19, 2007.
117Judgment and Order of Permanent Injunction in Shire Laboratories, Inc. v. Andrx Pharmaceuticals, LLC in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Miami Division, Case No. 07-22201-Civ-Cooke/Brown, Nov. 19, 2007.
118Judgment and Order of Permanent Injunction in Shire LLC v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Civil Action No. 06-952-SD, Mar. 6, 2008.
119Kao et al., Lag Time Method to Delay Drug Release to Various Sites in the Gastrointestinal Tract, Journal of Controlled Release 44(1997) 263-270.
120Kennerly S. Patrick & John S. Markowitz, Pharmacology of Methylphenidate, Amphetamine Enantiomers and Permoline in Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, Human Psychopharmacology, vol. 12, 527-546 (1997).
121Kiriyama et al., The Bioavailability of Oral Dosage Forms of a New HIV-1 Protease Inhibitor, KNI-272, in Beagle Dogs, Biopharmaceutics & Drug Disposition, vol. 17 125-134 (1996).
122Klaus Lehmann, Coating of Multiparticulates Using Polymeric Solutions, Multiparticulate Oral Drug Delivery (Swarbrick and Sellassie ed., 1994).
123Krowczynski & Brozyna, Extended-Release Dosage Forms, pp. 123-131 (1987).
124Leon Lachman, Herbert A. Lieberman, Joseph L. Kanig, The Theory and Practice of Industrial Pharmacy, Second Edition (1976) 371-373.
125Leopold & Eikeler, Eudragit E as Coating Material for the pH-Controlled Drug Release in the Topical Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD), Journal of Drug Targeting, 1998, vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 85-94.
126Lin & Cheng, In-vitro Dissolution Behaviour of Spansule-type Micropellets Prepared by Pan Coating Method, Pharm. Ind. 51 No. 5 (1989).
127Liu et al., Comparative Release of Phenylprepanolamine HCl from Long-Acting Appetite Suppressant Product: Acutrim vs. Dexatrim, Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy, 10(10), 1639-1661 (1984).
128Marcotte et al., Kinetics of Protein Diffusion from a Poly(D,L-Lactide) Reservoir System, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 79, No. 5, May 1990.
129Mathir et al., In vitro characterization of a controlled-release chlorpheniramine maleate delivery system prepared by the air-suspension technique, J. Microencapsulaton, vol. 14, No. 6, 743-751 (1997).
130McGough et al., Pharmacokinetics of SL1381 (Adderall XR), an Extended-Release Formulation of Adderall, Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, vol. 42, No. 6, Jun. 2003.
131McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Scientific and Technical Terms, 5th Ed. (1994), 97, 972.
132McGuiness Deposition Transcript, Aug. 6, 2004.
133Mehta et al., Evaluation of Fluid-bed Processes for Enteric Coating Systems, Pharmaceutical Technology, Apr. 1986.
134Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendants' Motion for Certification for Immediate Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) in Shire LLC v. Colony Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, Civil Action No. 1:07-cv-00718-CCB, Jan. 17, 2008.
135Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendants' Motion for Clarification or, in the Alternative for Reconsideration in Shire LLC v. Colony Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, Civil Action No. 1:07-cv-00718-CCB, Jan. 16, 2008.
136 *Modern Pharmaceutics, Banker, et al., eds., Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, p. 350 (1996).
137Moller, Dissolution Testing of Delayed Release Preparations, Proceedings of the International Symposium held on Jan. 29-31, 1987 (The Bombay College of Pharmacy 1988), 85-111.
138Neville et al., Disintegration of Dextran Sulfate Tablet Products: Effect of Physicochemical Properties, Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy, New York, NY, vol. 18, No. 19, Jan. 1, 1992 (Jan. 1, 1992), pp. 2069-2079, XP009092848, ISSN: 0363-9045.
139Office Action dated Dec. 6, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/091,011.
140Office Action dated Jun. 22, 2007 in Japanese patent Application No. 2000-576830.
141Office Action dated Jun. 22, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/091,011.
142Office Action issued Jul. 24, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/091,011.
143Office Action mailed Mar. 2, 2005 in European Patent Aplication No. 99 970594.0-2123.
144Opening Expert Report of Dr. Michael Mayersohn and exhibits thereto, Mar. 12, 2005.
145Opening Expert Report of Dr. Walter Chambliss and exhibits thereto, Mar. 15, 2005.
146Order and Memorandum Denying Colony's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Noninfringement of the '819 and '300 Patents in Shire LLC v. Colony Pharmaceuticals, Inc., in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, Case No. CCB-07-718, Jan. 2, 2008.
147Ozturk et al., "Kinetics of Release from Enteric-Coated Tablets," Pharmaceutical Research, 1988;5:550-565.
148Patrick et al., Pharmacology of Methylphenidate, Amphetamine Enantiomers and pemoline in Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, Human Psychopharmacology, vol. 12, pp. 527-546 (1997).
149PDR Drug Information for Ritalin LA Capsules, Apr. (2004).
150Pelham et al., A Comparison of Morning-Only and Morning/Late Afternoon Adderall to Morning-Only, Twice-Daily, and Three Times-Daily Methylphenidate in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder, Pediatrics, vol. 104, No. 6, Dec. 1999.
151Petition Under Section 8 and exhibits thereto, submitted to the Canadian Patent Office on Dec. 4, 2006.
152Physicians' Desk Reference: Adderall, 51st Ed. (1997).
153Physicians' Desk Reference: Adderall, 56th Ed. (2002).
154Physicians' Desk Reference: Dexedrine 56th Ed. (2002).
155Physicians' Desk Reference: Ritalin, 56th Ed. (2002).
156Plaintiff Shire LLC's Responses to Interrogatories Nos. 1-13 in Shire LLC v. Colony Parmaceuticals, Inc., in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, Case No. 1:07-cv-00718-CCB, Jun. 6, 2007.
157Plaintiff Shire LLC's Supplemental Responses to Interrogatory Nos. 1-5, 8, 9, & 12 in Shire LLC v. Colony Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, Civil Action No. 1:07-cv-00718-CCB, Aug. 22, 2007.
158Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' First Set of Interrogatories in Shire Labatories v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Case No. 2:06-cv-00952-SD, Oct. 11, 2006.
159Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' First Set of Production Requests in Shire Laboratories v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Case No. 2:06-cv-00952-SD, Oct. 11, 2006.
160Plaintiffs Shire Laboratories, Inc.'s and Shire LLC's Reply to Defendant Andrx Pharmaceuticals, LLC's Counterclaims in Shire Laboratories, Inc. and Shire, LLC v.Andrx Pharmaceuticals, LLC, et al., in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Miami Division, Case No. 07-22201-CIV-Cooke/Brown, Sep. 24, 2007.
161Porter and Bruno Coating of Pharmaceutical Solid-Dosage Forms, 77-160.
162 *Pozzi, et al., J. Controlled Release, vol. 31, pp. 99-108 (1994), The Time Clock System: a new oral dosage form for fast and complete release of drug after a predetermined lag time.
163Prescribing Information: Dexedrine, brand of dextroamphetamine sulfate (2001).
164R. Bianchini & C. Vecchio, Oral Controlled Release Optimization of Pellets Prepared by Extrusion-Spheronization Processing, IL Farmaco 44(6), 645-654, 1989.
165Rambali, et al., Using experimental design to optimize the process parameters in fluidized bed granulation on a semi-full scale, International Journal of Pharmaceutics 220 (2001) 149-160.
166Remington: The Science and Practice of Pharmacy, Basic Pharmacokinetics, 16th Ed. (1980), 693.
167Remington: The Science and Practice of Pharmacy, Elutriation, 20th Ed. (2000), 690.
168Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences, Fifteenth Edition (1975) 1624-1625.
169Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences, RPS XIV, 1700-1714.
170Reply to Counterclaims in Shire Laboratories v Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Case No. 2:06-cv-00952-SD, Aug. 16, 2006.
171Rong-Kun Chang and Joseph R. Robinson, Sustained Drug Release from Tablets and Particles Through Coating, Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms: Tablets (Marcel Dekker, Inc. 1990), 199-302.
172Rong-Kun Chang et al., Formulation Approaches for Oral Pulsatile Drug Delivery, American Pharmaceutical Review.
173Rong-Kun Chang, A Comparison of Rheological and Enteric Properties among Organic Solutions, Ammonium Salt Aqueous Solutions, and Latex Systems of Some Enteric Polymers, Pharmaceutical Technology, Oct. 1990.
174Rosen et al., Absorption and Excretion of Radioactively Tagged Dextroamphetamine Sulfate from a Sustained-Release Preparation, Jama, vol. 194, No. 11, Dec. 13, 1965. 145-147.
175Rosen, et al., Absorption and Excretion of Radioactively Tagged Dextroamphetamine Sulfate From a Sustained-Release Preparation, Journal of the American Medical Association, Dec. 13, 1965, vol. 194, No. 11, 1203-1205.
176Rudnic Deposition Transcript, Jul. 28, 2004.
177Schaffer Deposition Transcript, Aug. 17, 2005.
178Scheiffele, et al., Studies Comparing Kollicoat MAE 30 D with Commercial Cellulose Derivatives for Enteric Coating on Caffeine Cores, Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy, 24(9), 807-818 (1998), 807-818.
179Second Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement and Declaratory Relief in Shire Laboratories, Inc. and Shire, LLC v. Andrx Pharmaceuticals, LLC, et al., in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Miami Division, Case No. 07-22201-CIV-Cooke/Brown, Nov. 15, 2007.
180Serajuddin, et al., Selection of Solid Dosage Form Composition through Drug-Excipient Compatibility Testing, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences vol. 88, No. 7, Jul. 1999, 696-704.
181Shargel;. Pharmacokinetics of Oral Absorption, Applied Biopharmaceutics & Pharmacokinetics. 5th Ed. (2005), 164-166.
182Sheen, et al., Aqueous Film Coating Studies of Sustained Release Nicotinic Acid Pellets: An In-Vitro Evaluation, Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy, 18(8), 851-860 (1992).
183Shire Laboratories Inc.'s Opposition to Barr Laboratories' Motion to Amend Its Answers and Counterclaims, Sep. 15, 2004.
184Slattum, et al., Comparison of Methods for the Assessment of Central Nervous System Stimulant Response after Dextroamphetamine Adminstration to Healthy Male Volunteers, J. Clin Pharmacol 1996; 36: 1039-1050.
185 *Snire Laboratory Inc's Complaint against Barr Laboratories based on Parent U.S. patent 6,322,815 in U S District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case No. 03-CV-1219(VM)(DFE)) 2003.
186 *Snire Laboratory Inc's Complaint against Barr Laboratories based on Parent U.S. patent 6,322,815 in U S District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case No. 03-CV-1219(VM)(DFE)) 2003.
187Sprowls' American Pharmacy: An Introduction to Pharmaceutical Techniques and Dosage Forms, 7th Ed. (1974), 387-388.
188Sriamornsak, et al., Development of sustained release theophylline pellets coated with calcium pectinate, Journal of Controlled Release 47 (1997) 221-232.
189Stevens, et al., Controlled, Multidose, Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Two Extended-Release Carbamazepine Formulations (Carbatrol and Tegretol-XR), Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences vol. 87, No. 12, Dec. 1998, 1531-1534.
190Supplemental Expert Report of Harry G. Brittain, PhD, FRSC in Shire LLC v. Colony Pharaceuticals, Inc., in the United States District Court of the District of Maryland, Case No. 1:07-cv-00718, Feb. 15, 2008.
191Supplemental Expert Report of Vladimir P. Torchilin, Ph.D., D.Sc. Regarding the Invalidity of U.S. Patent No. 6,605,300 in Shire LLC v. Colony Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, Civil Action No. 1:07-cv-00718-CCB and exhibits thereto, Feb. 15, 2008.
192Teva Notice letter: Feb. 21, 2005.
193Teva Notice letter: Jun. 1, 2005.
194The Merck Index: Amphetamine, 12th Ed., 620.
195The Merck Index: Amphetamine, 13th Ed. (2001), 97, 1089.
196The United States Pharmacopeia 23, National Formulary 18 (1995) pp. 1791-1799.
197The United States Pharmacopeia 26, National Formulary 21 (2003) pp. 2157-2165.
198The United States Pharmacopeia 27, National Formulary 22 (2004) pp. 2302-2312.
199Transcript of Beth A. Burnside Deposition in Shire LLC v. Colony Pharmaceuticals, in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, Case No. 1:07-cv-00718-CCB, Nov. 9, 2007.
200Transcript of Beth A. Burnside Deposition in Shire LLC vs. Sandoz Inc. in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, Case No. 07-CV-00197-EWN-CBS, Nov. 30, 2007.
201Transcript of Kimberly Fiske Farrand Deposition in Shire, LLC v. Sandoz, Inc. in Shire, LLC v. Sandoz, Inc. in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, Dec. 4, 2007.
202Transcript of Richard A. Couch 30(b)(6) Deposition in Shire LLC vs. Sandoz Inc. in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, Dec. 14, 2007.
203Transcript of Richard A. Couch Deposition in Shire LLC v. Colony Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, Case No. 1:07-cv-00718-CCB, Nov. 15, 2007.
204Transcript of Richard Rong-Kun Chang in Shire LLC v. Colony Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, Case No. 1:07-cv-00718-CCB, Nov. 20, 2007.
205Treacy Deposition Transcript, Aug. 31, 2004.
206Treatise on Controlled Drug Delivery, pp. 285-299 (Agis Kydonieus ed. 1992).
207Tulloch, et al., SL1381 (Adderall XR), a Two-component, Extended-Release Formulation of Mixed Amphetamine Salts: Bioavailability of Three Test formulatons and Comparison of Fasted, Fed, and Sprinkled Administration, PHARMACOTHERAPY vol. 22, No. 11. (2002), 1405-1415.
208U.S. Appl. No. 11/091,011, filed Apr. 7, 2009 Non-Final Office Action.
209US 6,034,101, 3/2000, Gupta et al. (withdrawn)
210Vasilevska, et al., Preparation and Dissolution Characteristics of Controlled Release Diltiazem Pellets, Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy, 18(15), 1649-1661 (1992).
211 *Walia, et al., Pharm. Dev. Tech., vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 103-113 (1998), Preliminary Evaluation of an Aqueous Wax Emulsion for Controlled-Release Coating.
212Watano, et al., Evaluation of Aqueous Enteric Coated Granules prepared by Moisture Control Method in Tumbling Fluidized Bed Process, Chem. Pharm. Bull. 42(3) 663-667 (1994).
213Wesdyk, et al., Factors affecting differences in film thickness of beads coated in fluidized bed units, International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 93 101-109, (1993).
214Wigal, et al., Evaluation of Infividual Subjects in the Analog Clasroom Setting; II. Effects of Dose of Amphetamine (Adderall), Psychopharmacology Bulletin, vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 833-838, 1998.
215 *Wilding et al., Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 9, No. 5, pp. 654-657 (1992), Gastrointestinal Transit and Systemic Absorption of Captopil from Pulsed-Release Formulation.
216Wouessidjewe, Aqueous polymethacrylate Dispersions as Coating Materials for Sustained and Enteric Release Systems, S.T.P. Pharma Sciences 7(6) 469-475 (1997).
217 *Xu, et al., Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 10, No. 8, pp. 1144-1152 (1993), Programmable Drug Delivery from an Erodible Association Polymer System.
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US8652527Mar 19, 2013Feb 18, 2014Upsher-Smith Laboratories, IncExtended-release topiramate capsules
Classifications
U.S. Classification424/452, 424/470, 424/458, 424/471, 424/469, 514/649, 424/468, 424/472
International ClassificationA61K9/50, A61K9/52, A61K9/22, A61K9/54, A61K9/32, A61K31/137, A61K47/38, A61K9/28, A61K47/26, A61P25/28, A61K9/58, A61K9/26, A61K9/48, A61K9/24, A61K31/135
Cooperative ClassificationA61K31/137, A61K9/5078, A61K9/5047, A61K9/5026
European ClassificationA61K9/50H6F2B, A61K9/50H6B, A61K31/137, A61K9/50K2
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
Feb 8, 2011CCCertificate of correction