|Publication number||USRE41153 E1|
|Application number||US 12/031,908|
|Publication date||Mar 2, 2010|
|Priority date||Jun 12, 2003|
|Also published as||EP1486798A2, EP1486798A3, EP1486798B1, EP2530486A2, EP2530486A3, EP2546921A2, EP2546921A3, EP2546921B1, US7136011, US20040252046, USRE42708|
|Publication number||031908, 12031908, US RE41153 E1, US RE41153E1, US-E1-RE41153, USRE41153 E1, USRE41153E1|
|Inventors||Morten Mork, Rolf Bakken|
|Original Assignee||Ocas As|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (26), Non-Patent Citations (2), Referenced by (14), Classifications (53), Legal Events (3)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
The invention relates to systems for avoidance of collision between an aircraft and an obstacle on the ground, and relates in particular to systems of this kind that comprise a radar device for detection of an aircraft in flight and a device for warning the operator of the aircraft of a possible collision obstacle that is in the vicinity of the aircraft.
Accidents in which planes or helicopters fly into power lines happen once or twice a year in Norway, and almost weekly in the USA. These accidents often result in the loss of human life and substantial material damage. The accidents are a clear indication that today's marking of power lines and other aerial obstacles is not good enough. Marking of aerial obstacles using a system for avoidance of collision between an aircraft and an obstacle, hereinafter called OCAS, can reduce the number of accidents of this type considerably.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,351,032 discloses a short-range radio system, wherein the system provides both audio and visual warnings to the pilot of an aircraft of an upcoming power line. The system comprises a small narrow-band transmitter which utilises power from the power line, wherein the narrow-band transmitter may be installed on top of a power line tower or within already existing warning balls on the power line. The narrow-band transmitter provides a continuous warning signal to aircraft that approach the deployed narrowband transmitter, and a receiver installed on board the aircraft capable of receiving the warning signal from the narrow-band transmitter will, upon receipt of the warning signal, trigger both an audio and a visual alarm to alert the pilot of the aircraft to the potential hazard. Thus, the system requires that a part thereof, in this case a systemadapted receiver, should be located in the aircraft, and will only be effective in warning aircraft that have a part of the system installed therein. Therefore, aircraft that do not have a receiver of this kind installed will not be able to take advantage of the possible warning that the narrow-band transmitter could give. Furthermore, the system does not include any means for determining the distance between the aircraft and the obstacle, and it will thus be a matter of chance whether the receiver in the aircraft picks up the warning signal at a short or a long distance, which may result in a warning that is too late or in an unnecessary warning to aircraft which are at a great distance, but nevertheless within the maximum range that is determined by the propagation potential of the radio waves, the presence or absence of noise sources and the sensitivity of the receiver in question.
Thus, it is an object of the present invention to provide a solution that can give a warning to an operator of an aircraft in order to prevent collision between an aircraft and an obstacle, which overcomes the drawbacks of the previously known solutions.
The present invention provides a system for avoidance of collision between an aircraft and an obstacle, characterised by the features set forth in the attached independent patent claims.
Additional advantageous features of the invention are set forth in the attached dependent patent claims.
In the following description, the present invention will be explained in more detail with the aid of examples and with reference to the attached drawings, wherein:
An OCAS system according to the invention is comprised of units which communicate with each other, and which also are arranged to communicate with a centre, for example an OCC=OCAS Control Centre. The status of OCAS field units can be monitored from an OCC, with reporting to, for example, NOTAM or a Web-page. The warning areas can be reprogrammed from the OCC, and OCAS field units can also be upgraded and have faults rectified therefrom.
Below there follows a short description of the main features of the functioning of the system. An OCAS field unit will typically be placed in the vicinity of an aerial obstacle of which the OCAS unit is to give warning. One of the said OCAS field units consists primarily of a radar device, a VHF radio, a power source and a mast.
A radar which is part of an OCAS system according to the invention is arranged to have low power consumption, and is constructed to seek continuously in its coverage area for moving aircraft. Upon detection of an aircraft, the radar is arranged to follow the aircraft as a defined target. The course, height and speed of this target are computed and registered in the OCAS field unit. The OCAS field unit is provided with a device that follows the registered course, height and speed, and is arranged to activate a warning to enable the pilot to manoeuvre safely away from the aerial obstacle if the target's course, height and speed are of such character that there is a danger of collision with the aerial obstacle.
The VHF radio of an OCAS field unit, which is an integral part of a system according to the invention, permits the remote control of warning lights, audio warning signals and communication within a network of OCAS field units.
The OCAS field unit is designed for low power consumption, and will typically be supplied with power from batteries and/or solar panels. This mode of power supply renders the field unit self-sufficient in energy and independent of power supply from a mains network. As a supplement to the power supply from batteries and solar panels, the OCAS field unit may be provided with a power supply unit or a connection for the mains network, which permits operation even if batteries or solar panels should not be capable of supplying the necessary electric power. A power supply solution of this kind will advantageously give low running costs and simplified installation and operation in remote, accessible locations.
An OCAS field unit will typically be mounted on a mast. The mast which is a part of an OCAS system according to the invention is flexibly constructed of modules to facilitate transport. Thus, it is simple to assemble, and a whole OCAS field unit is so constructed and its materials are so selected that the unit is resistant to harsh climatic conditions. Furthermore, the mast and the OCAS field unit are designed and constructed in accordance with modem environmental requirements, and thus blend into the surroundings and permit optimal positioning of the radar. An OCAS system according to the invention has a number of operating modes, of which one keeps the actual radar unit in operation to continuously monitor the radar's coverage area, whilst the other parts of the system “sleep”. With the radar in operating mode, this coverage area is defined by two warning zones. The two warning zones are a warning zone for a light signal and a warning zone for an audio signal. In the case of aircraft that are detected in the light signal warning zone, an OCAS system according to the invention activates a light signal mounted on or close to the aerial obstacle to aid the aircraft operator's or pilot's visual detection of the obstacle situation. If, despite the light signal warning in the first warning zone, the aircraft does not make any evasive manoeuvre, but continues its journey into the second warning zone, an acoustic signal that is given via a VHF radio is activated. The audible warning signal given via the VHF radio is characteristic, distinctive and easy to recognise, and is transmitted on all relevant VHF frequencies to aircraft within the VHF radio's range. A VHF radio, or a radio operating on other frequency bands, and which is a part of an OCAS system according to the invention, is provided with a programming device so that some frequencies can be defined so as not to carry the sound warning.
A radar device in an OCAS system according to the invention includes a radar signal processing unit which determines whether a detected object is within the defined detection area, and within the defined warning zones. Detection areas and warning zones are defined through the programming of the processing unit and by the actual coverage area of the radar, so that the warning zones are limited in the vertical plane. Typically, such a limitation in the vertical plane for an OCAS system according to the invention will be defined so that objects, or targets, which are, or will come, at a height of less than 50 meters above the highest point of the associated aerial obstacle trigger a warning.
The radar system in an OCAS system according to the invention is arranged to determine whether a target has a course and height that may result in the target colliding with the aerial obstacle if the identified course and height are maintained. If the target's course and height are of such a character, the light warning will be activated when the target is in the warning zone. The warning zone will thus be partly defined by means of the target's speed and direction, and is given an area in accordance with these factors in order to activate a warning in good time before a potential collision happens. The warning time is thus calculated to help the pilot see the obstacle and manoeuvre away from the obstacle to avoid collision.
A light warning may, for example, be a stroboscopic light which flashes about 40 times per minute.
An acoustic warning via a VHF radio may typically be a signal that is transmitted with a duration of 5.5 seconds, and which alerts the aviator to the fact that he is in the vicinity of an aerial obstacle.
An OCAS system according to the invention may also be provided with a device for following a target that is detected within the radar's range, and for following the target with a warning when the target enters a warning zone, but then desisting from giving new warnings if the target is slow-moving and is inside the warning zone for a long time. This is advantageous, for example, if it is necessary to carry out work on or in the immediate vicinity of an aerial obstacle, such as a power line, using a helicopter or other slow-moving aircraft. In such a case, the warning will be given in the usual way when the aircraft first enters the warning zone, but new warnings will not be given as long as the aircraft is inside the warning zone. Should the aircraft leave the warning zone and then re-enter it, a new warning, either a light or audio warning, will be activated as before.
An OCAS system according to the invention may include several OCAS field units. OCAS field units are provided with means of communication for communicating with each other, and can exchange information relating to a target detected within the field unit's range.
Optionally, an OCAS field unit according to the invention may be equipped with communication systems for communication with an OCAS operation centre, which, for example, may be located in already existing monitoring stations. OCAS monitoring will thus be another important part of system monitoring. From an OCAS operation centre, the technical and operational status of each OCAS field centre can be monitored, and a simple remote diagnosis can be made, possibly followed by fault rectification of The parts of the OCAS field unit that are designed for remote fault rectification. The possibility of remote monitoring, remote diagnosis and remote fault rectification will give low inspection costs compared with previously known manual inspection of systems, and will contribute to greater safety as a result of this possibility for real-time function reporting. The OCAS remote reporting capability allows the status of the system to be reported automatically to other units that are responsible for systems associated with the handling of air transport, and thus permits, for example, the state of the system to be made known to pilots and operators through notification via NOTAM.
Details of a mechanical construction in an assembled antenna system which is suitable for the invention is shown in
The framework construction is shown in more detail in
First, let us discuss the calculation of the physical size of the antenna. The radar system is assigned a frequency of around 1.3-1.5 GHz (information from KITRON 10 Sep. 2001). The wavelength is then 4=c/f=22.3−23.1 cm. This makes it possible to determine the mechanical external dimensions of the antenna. Based on an operational frequency of 1.325 GHz, the diameter of the antenna is estimated to be about 50 cm. Including a surrounding cylindrical radome, the external diameter will be about 65 cm. The height of the antenna will be determined by the number of elements per column which will be clarified in the specification phase of the development. With eight elements per column, the height of the antenna will be about 1.3 meters.
Below there follows a more detailed description of the structural design of the antenna as it is also outlined in the attached drawings. The antenna will consist of eight columns of radiating elements around a cylinder. The sub-project “Antenna” will comprise the design of the actual radiating element, active element pair and the group antenna with N elements in the vertical direction, including excitation/feed method. This will include integration of the antenna with feed line, which will be an interface with sub-project “Antenna interface”. In coordination with sub-project “Antenna interface”, a mechanical framework will be developed or proposed for the mounting of antenna modules and the boards which are a part of “Antenna interface”. In addition, a radome will be specified both electrically and mechanically, adapted to the mechanical framework.
In what follows there is a description of structural details of an antenna element in an antenna panel for an antenna design as illustrated in the attached drawings. For eight elements in the vertical direction, the total height will be about 1.3 meters. The substrate requirement will then be about 8×1.3 m×0.2 m=2 m2 per antenna.
The antenna itself will be a microstrip patch antenna, which we believe will give reasonable production costs due to the etching of a patch pattern. A microstrip patch antenna consists of a rectangular metal surface (=patch) that is etched out on one side of a substrate, whilst the other side of the substrate is metallized, and constitutes the patch ground plane. The patch antenna is fed via a probe that is drawn through the antenna ground plane and soldered to the patch itself.
Bandwidth requirements call for a minimum height between patch and ground plane. Preliminary calculations show that with a typical microwave substrate (TLC-30 from Taconix) a substrate thickness of about 3 mm is required. This is the alternative 1 embodiment as shown for example in FIG. 14.
The TLC30 substrate is regarded as a low-cost substrate for microwave frequencies. It is supplied with a one or two-sided copper coating. The price for a sheet is given as $370, or $330 per m2 (thickness 1.6 mm). For a large order, we can expect the price per sheet to be reduced by about 40%. This seems to be a costly solution where materials are concerned.
Alternative 2 embodiment: If FR4 material is used as a substrate for the patch antenna, a substrate thickness of about 3 mm is required. One side of the board is then mentallized (copper), whilst the other side consists of patches (etched pattern), such as that illustrated in FIG. 14.
The alternative 3 embodiment is shown in the illustration in
Alternative 3 is a preferred embodiment of an antenna panel for an OCAS marker, as it has cavities which give more advantages in terms of electromagnetics than alternatives 1 and 2.
Below there follows a discussion of an antenna interface that is suitable for the antenna discussed above. The antenna interface comprises a board and components on the signal path between the patch and the elements of the RF radar signal, as illustrated in FIG. 13.
To make mounting and maintenance easier, we will consider moving all boards to the bottom of the antenna. This will give longer feed lines out to the patch elements, which gives increased loss etc. The feed lines can then be placed on the back of the FR4 substrate which functions as an ground plane for the patches as illustrated in FIG. 15.
Below there follows a description of radome solutions for protection of the antenna panels against impact from the surroundings. The radome can be integrated in a number of ways. In our original proposal, the radome is a large cylinder having an external diameter of about 65 cm, which is “threaded” onto the antenna. An alternative to this is one radome per antenna panel (8). See the sketch on a separate sheet. The rest of the electronics must then be protected in another way. See
In the following features of an advantageous framework structure for securing and positioning antenna panels are described. The framework will form a mechanical frame for the integration of antenna panels (8) and boards from the “antenna interface” and radome, as outlined for example in
To summarise, an OCAS marker according to the invention consists primarily of a radar system connected to a central processing unit, to which there is also connected a light system and a radio system for transmission of the warning signal. The marker also includes a power supply system with an electric power generator of the solar cell type or wind generator type, and a back-up battery, and possibly also a connection to power supply from a nearby mains network. Where several OCAS markers are to work together in one network, systems for internal communication whereby the OCAS markers can exchange information about target movements within their coverage area and operational status information are included in order to establish a continuous chain of OCAS markers, and to ensure communication and warning beyond that which could be provided by a single marker. A typical OCAS marker field unit is mounted on a tubular mast structure 700 formed by three tubular mast structural members, respectively a bottom tube 730, a central tube 720 and a top tube 710, where the top tube 710 includes a mounting interface for attachment of a cylindrical or segmental radar antenna.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US802020||May 22, 1903||Oct 17, 1905||John Patten||Fog distance-signaling method.|
|US1709377||Apr 26, 1922||Apr 16, 1929||Sperry Dev Co||Beacon system for night flying|
|US2095306||Oct 10, 1932||Oct 12, 1937||Ohio Brass Co||Marker light|
|US2212110||Aug 4, 1937||Aug 20, 1940||Telefunken Gmbh||Radio beacon system|
|US2214102||May 17, 1939||Sep 10, 1940||Edmund C Mayo||Antenna system|
|US3725934 *||May 28, 1971||Apr 3, 1973||D Ludlow||Collision warning indicator|
|US3735401 *||Jul 27, 1970||May 22, 1973||Ishikawajima Harima Heavy Ind||Alarm apparatus for preventing collision of moving bodies|
|US3760416||Nov 24, 1971||Sep 18, 1973||Int Standard Electric Corp||Runway traffic surveillance device|
|US4104638||Jun 23, 1976||Aug 1, 1978||Middleton Raymond R||Cooperative type anti-collision radio system|
|US4298875 *||Feb 2, 1979||Nov 3, 1981||Leo K. O'Brien||Aircraft collision avoidance system|
|US4646244 *||Feb 2, 1984||Feb 24, 1987||Sundstrand Data Control, Inc.||Terrain advisory system|
|US4755818||Aug 15, 1986||Jul 5, 1988||The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army||Aircraft collision warning system|
|US4835537||Aug 8, 1988||May 30, 1989||Manion James H||Telemetry burst collision avoidance system|
|US5252978||Jul 16, 1992||Oct 12, 1993||Gec Ferranti Defence Systems Limited||Collision warning system|
|US5351032||Feb 19, 1993||Sep 27, 1994||Regents Of The University Of California||Power line detection system|
|US5400008||May 3, 1990||Mar 21, 1995||Toohey; James T.||Location marker|
|US5663720||Jun 2, 1995||Sep 2, 1997||Weissman; Isaac||Method and system for regional traffic monitoring|
|US5760686||Sep 3, 1996||Jun 2, 1998||Toman; John R.||Assembly and method for detecting errant vehicles and warning work zone personnel thereof|
|US5774088||May 8, 1997||Jun 30, 1998||The University Of Pittsburgh||Method and system for warning birds of hazards|
|US5892462||Jun 20, 1997||Apr 6, 1999||Honeywell Inc.||Adaptive ground collision avoidance system|
|US5936552||Jun 12, 1997||Aug 10, 1999||Rockwell Science Center, Inc.||Integrated horizontal and profile terrain display format for situational awareness|
|US6181261||Jun 24, 1999||Jan 30, 2001||The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army||Airfield hazard automated detection system|
|US6294985||Aug 5, 1999||Sep 25, 2001||Jeffery M. Simon||Remotely triggered collision avoidance strobe system|
|US6538581||Aug 26, 1999||Mar 25, 2003||Bae Systems Plc||Apparatus for indicating air traffic and terrain collision threat to an aircraft|
|US6708091||May 31, 2002||Mar 16, 2004||Steven Tsao||Automated terrain awareness and avoidance system|
|US6762695||Aug 13, 2002||Jul 13, 2004||At&T Corp.||Radio tower lighting system|
|1||Luffartskonferansen for ledende personell, Feb. 2002.|
|2||Post-OG Teletilsynet, Arsrapport 2000.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7876260 *||Jan 25, 2011||Eric David Laufer||Method and system for reducing light pollution|
|US7982659 *||Dec 14, 2010||Jul 19, 2011||Laufer Wind Group Llc||Method and system for reducing light pollution|
|US8665138 *||Jun 13, 2011||Mar 4, 2014||Laufer Wind Group Llc||Method and system for reducing light pollution|
|US9010969||Mar 19, 2012||Apr 21, 2015||Hughey & Phillips, Llc||Lighting system|
|US9013331||Aug 28, 2012||Apr 21, 2015||Hughey & Phillips, Llc||Lighting and collision alerting system|
|US9196168 *||May 20, 2009||Nov 24, 2015||Textron Innovations Inc.||Collision avoidance and warning system|
|US9297514||Apr 20, 2015||Mar 29, 2016||Hughey & Phillips, Llc||Lighting system|
|US20090034259 *||Jul 14, 2008||Feb 5, 2009||Eric David Laufer||Method and System for Reducing Light Pollution|
|US20100299067 *||May 20, 2009||Nov 25, 2010||Bell Helicopter Textron Inc.||Collision avoidance and warning system|
|US20110109491 *||Dec 14, 2010||May 12, 2011||Eric David Laufer||Method and system for reducing light pollution|
|US20110241926 *||Oct 6, 2011||Eric David Laufer||Method and system for reducing light pollution|
|US20150323658 *||May 6, 2014||Nov 12, 2015||Mark Resources, Inc.||Marine Radar Based on Cylindrical Array Antennas with Other Applications|
|US20150323659 *||Apr 20, 2015||Nov 12, 2015||Mark Resources, Inc.||Marine Radar Based on Cylindrical Array Antennas with Other Applications|
|USRE42708 *||Sep 20, 2011||Ocas As||System for avoidance of collision between an aircraft and an obstacle|
|U.S. Classification||342/29, 342/27, 342/175, 342/58, 340/945, 701/300, 342/147, 701/9, 701/3, 340/983, 701/4, 342/118, 342/104, 342/60, 342/195, 342/28, 701/8, 340/981, 701/301, 342/52|
|International Classification||H01Q1/12, H01Q1/42, H01Q21/28, H01Q21/20, G08G5/04, G01S13/93, B64D47/00, G01S13/94|
|Cooperative Classification||G01S2013/0254, H01Q21/205, H01Q1/06, G08G5/0013, H01Q1/42, G01S13/91, G01S7/003, H01Q21/065, H01Q21/20, G08G5/0026, H01Q1/1242, H01Q21/28, G01S13/94|
|European Classification||G01S13/93A, G01S7/00R, H01Q1/06, H01Q21/20B, H01Q21/06B3, G01S13/86, H01Q21/20, H01Q1/12D, H01Q21/28, H01Q1/42, G08G5/00B4, G08G5/00A4|
|Jun 7, 2010||SULP||Surcharge for late payment|
|Jun 7, 2010||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Nov 10, 2011||AS||Assignment|
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:OCAS AS (REG. NO. 997196872);REEL/FRAME:027207/0942
Effective date: 20111028
Owner name: VESTAS WIND SYSTEMS A/S, DENMARK
Effective date: 20111025
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:OBSTACLE COLLISION AVOIDANCE SYSTEM AS;REEL/FRAME:027205/0313
Owner name: OCAS AS (REG. NO. 997196872), NORWAY