Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUSRE41352 E1
Publication typeGrant
Application numberUS 11/862,124
Publication dateMay 25, 2010
Filing dateSep 26, 2007
Priority dateFeb 19, 1998
Fee statusPaid
Also published asUS6061344, US6282186, USRE40686, USRE41471, USRE42254, USRE42599
Publication number11862124, 862124, US RE41352 E1, US RE41352E1, US-E1-RE41352, USRE41352 E1, USRE41352E1
InventorsClifton W. Wood, Jr.
Original AssigneeKeystone Technology Solutions, Llc
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Method of addressing messages and communications
US RE41352 E1
Abstract
A method of establishing wireless communications between an interrogator and individual ones of multiple wireless identification devices, the method comprising utilizing a tree search method to attempt to identify individual ones of the multiple wireless identification devices so as to be able to perform communications, without collision, between the interrogator and individual ones of the multiple wireless identification devices, a search tree being defined for the tree search method, the tree having multiple nodes respectively representing subgroups of the multiple wireless identification devices, wherein the interrogator transmits a command at a node, requesting that devices within the subgroup represented by the node respond, wherein the interrogator determines if a collision occurs in response to the command and, if not, repeats the command at the same node. An interrogator configured to transmit a command at a node, requesting that devices within the subgroup represented by the node respond, the interrogator further being configured to determine if a collision occurs in response to the command and, if not, to repeat the command at the same node . In one aspect, a method implemented in an RFID device includes: receiving a first command, comprising a first set of bit values, from an interrogator to select the RFID device based on a comparison between the first set of bit values and data stored in the RFID device; transmitting a response to the first command, the response including an identifier of the RFID device; if the response is received at an interrogator, remaining silent when the first command is subsequently repeated; and if the response is not received at the interrogator, re-transmitting the response when the first command is subsequently repeated.
Images(4)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(85)
1. A method of establishing wireless communications between an interrogator and wireless identification devices, the method comprising utilizing a tree search technique to establish communications, without collision, between the interrogator and individual ones of the multiple wireless identification devices, the method including using a search tree having multiple nodes respectively representing subgroups of the multiple wireless identification devices, the method further comprising, for a node, transmitting a command, using the interrogator, requesting that devices within the subgroup represented by the node respond, determining with the interrogator if a collision occurred in response to the command and, if not, repeating the command at the same node.
2. A method in accordance with claim 1 and further comprising, if a collision occurred in response to the first mentioned command, sending a command at a different node, using the interrogator.
3. A method in accordance with claim 1 wherein when a subgroup contains both a device that is within communications range of the interrogator, and a device that is not within communications range of the interrogator, the device that is not within communications range of the interrogator does not respond to the command.
4. A method in accordance with claim 1 wherein when a subgroup contains both a device that is within communications range of the interrogator, and a device that is not within communications range of the interrogator, the device that is within communications range of the interrogator responds to the command.
5. A method in accordance with claim 1 wherein a device in a subgroup changes between being within communications range of the interrogator and not being within communications range, over time.
6. A method in accordance with claim 1 wherein the wireless identification device comprises an integrated circuit including a receiver, a modulator, and a microprocessor in communication with the receiver and modulator.
7. A method of addressing messages from an interrogator to a selected one or more of a number of communications devices, the method comprising:
establishing for respective devices unique identification numbers;
causing the devices to select random values, wherein respective devices choose random values independently of random values selected by the other devices;
transmitting a communication, from the interrogator, requesting devices having random values within a first specified group of random values to respond;
receiving the communication at multiple devices, devices receiving the communication respectively determining if the random value chosen by the device falls within the first specified group and, if so, sending a reply to the interrogator; and
determining using the interrogator if a collision occurred between devices that sent a reply and, if so, creating a second specified group smaller than the first specified group; and, if not, again transmitting a communication requesting devices having random values within the first specified group of random values to respond.
8. A method of addressing messages from an interrogator to a selected one or more of a number of communications devices in accordance with claim 7 wherein sending a reply to the interrogator comprises transmitting the unique identification number of the device sending the reply.
9. A method in accordance with claim 7 wherein one of the first and second specified groups contains both a device that is within communications range of the interrogator, and a device that is not within communications range of the interrogator, and wherein the device that is not within communications range of the interrogator does not respond to the interrogator.
10. A method of addressing messages from an interrogator to a selected one or more of a number of communications devices in accordance with claim 7 wherein, after receiving a reply without collision from a device, the interrogator sends a communication individually addressed to that device.
11. A method of addressing messages from a transponder to a selected one or more of a number of communications devices, the method comprising:
establishing unique identification numbers for respective devices;
causing the devices to select random values, wherein respective devices choose random values independently of random values selected by the other devices;
transmitting a communication from the transponder requesting devices having random values within a specified group of a plurality of possible groups of random values to respond, the plurality of possible groups being organized in a binary tree defined by a plurality of nodes at respective levels, the specified group being defined as being at one of the nodes;
receiving the communication at multiple devices, devices receiving the communication respectively determining if the random value chosen by the device falls within the specified group and, if so, sending a reply to the transponder; and, if not, not sending a reply; and
determining using the transponder if a collision occurred between devices that sent a reply and, if so, creating a new, smaller, specified group by descending in the tree; and, if not, transmitting a communication at the same node.
12. A method of addressing messages from a transponder to a selected one or more of a number of communications devices in accordance with claim 11 wherein establishing unique identification numbers for respective devices comprises establishing a predetermined number of bits to be used for the unique identification numbers.
13. A method of addressing messages from a transponder to a selected one or more of a number of communications devices in accordance with claim 12 and further including establishing a predetermined number of bits to be used for the random values.
14. A method of addressing messages from an interrogator to a selected one or more of a number of RFID devices, the method comprising:
establishing for respective devices unique identification numbers;
causing the devices to select random values, wherein respective devices choose random values independently of random values selected by the other devices;
transmitting a command using the interrogator requesting devices having random values within a specified group of a plurality of possible groups of random values to respond, the specified group being equal to or less than the entire set of random values, the plurality of possible groups being organized in a binary tree defined by a plurality of nodes at respective levels;
receiving the command at multiple RFID devices, RFID devices receiving the command respectively determining if their chosen random values fall within the specified group and, only if so, sending a reply to the interrogator, wherein sending a reply to the interrogator comprises transmitting the unique identification number of the device sending the reply;
determining using the interrogator if a collision occurred between devices that sent a reply and, if so, creating a new, smaller, specified group using a different level of the tree, the interrogator transmitting a command requesting devices having random values within the new specified group of random values to respond; and, if not, the interrogator re-transmitting a command requesting devices having random values within the first mentioned specified group of random values to respond; and
if a reply without collision is received from a device, the interrogator subsequently sending a command individually addressed to that device.
15. A method of addressing messages from an interrogator to a selected one or more of a number of RFID devices in accordance with claim 14 wherein the first mentioned specified group contains both a device that is within communications range of the interrogator, and a device that is not within communications range of the interrogator, and wherein the device that is not within communications range of the interrogator does not respond to the transmitting of the command or the re-transmitting of the command.
16. A method of addressing messages from an interrogator to a selected one or more of a number of RFID devices in accordance with claim 14 wherein the first mentioned specified group contains both a device that is within communications range of the interrogator, and a device that is not within communications range of the interrogator, and wherein the device that is within communications range of the interrogator responds to the transmitting of the command and the re-transmitting of the command.
17. A method of addressing messages from an interrogator to a selected one or more of a number of RFID devices in accordance with claim 14 wherein a device in the first mentioned specified group is capable of changing between being within communications range of the interrogator and not being within communications range of the interrogator over time.
18. A method of addressing messages from an interrogator to a selected one or more of a number of RFID devices in accordance with claim 14 wherein the devices respectively comprise an integrated circuit including a receiver, a modulator, and a microprocessor in communication with the receiver and modulator.
19. A method of addressing messages from an interrogator to a selected one or more of a number of RFID devices in accordance with claim 14 and further comprising, after the interrogator transmits a command requesting devices having random values within the new specified group of random values to respond;
devices receiving the command respectively determining if their chosen random values fall within the new smaller specified group and, if so, sending a reply to the interrogator.
20. A method of addressing messages from an interrogator to a selected one or more of a number of RFID devices in accordance with claim 19 and further comprising, after the interrogator transmits a command requesting devices having random values within the new specified group of random values to respond;
determining if a collision occurred between devices that sent a reply and, if so, creating a new specified group and repeating the transmitting of the command requesting devices having random values within a specified group of random values to respond using different specified groups until all of the devices capable of communicating with the interrogator are identified.
21. A communications system comprising an interrogator, and a plurality of wireless identification devices configured to communicate with the interrogator using RF, the interrogator being configured to employ tree searching to attempt to identify individual ones of the multiple wireless identification devices, so as to be able to perform communications without collision between the interrogator and individual ones of the multiple wireless identification devices, the interrogator being configured to follow a search tree, the tree having multiple nodes respectively representing subgroups of the multiple wireless identification devices, the interrogator being configured to transmit a command at a node, requesting that devices within the subgroup represented by the node respond, the interrogator further being configured to determine if a collision occurs in response to the command and, if not, to repeat the command at the same node.
22. A communications system in accordance with claim 21 wherein the interrogator is configured to send a command at a different node if a collision occurs in response to the first mentioned command.
23. A communications system in accordance with claim 21 wherein a subgroup contains both a device that is within communications range of the interrogator, and a device that is not within communications range of the interrogator.
24. A communications system in accordance with claim 21 wherein a subgroup contains both a device that is within communications range of the interrogator, and a device that is not within communications range of the interrogator, and wherein the device that is within communications range of the interrogator responds to the command.
25. A communications system in accordance with claim 21 wherein a device in a subgroup is movable relative to the interrogator so as to be capable of changing between being within communications range of the interrogator and not being within communications range.
26. A communications system in accordance with claim 21 wherein the wireless identification device comprises an integrated circuit including a receiver, a modulator, and a microprocessor in communication with the receiver and modulator.
27. A system comprising:
an interrogator;
a number of communications devices capable of wireless communications with the interrogator;
means for establishing for respective devices unique identification numbers respectively having the first predetermined number of bits;
means for causing the devices to select random values, wherein respective devices choose random values independently of random values selected by the other devices;
means for causing the interrogator to transmit a command requesting devices having random values within a specified group of random values to respond;
means for causing devices receiving the command to determine if their chosen random values fall within the specified group and, if so, to send a reply to the interrogator; and
means for causing the interrogator to determine if a collision occurred between devices that sent a reply and, if so, to create a new, smaller, specified group; and, if not, transmit a command requesting devices having random values within the same specified group of random values to respond.
28. A system in accordance with claim 27 wherein sending a reply to the interrogator comprises transmitting the unique identification number of the device sending the reply.
29. A system in accordance with claim 27 wherein a specified group contains both a device that is within communications range of the interrogator, and a device that is not within communications range of the interrogator.
30. A system in accordance with claim 27 wherein the interrogator further includes means for, after receiving a reply without collision from a device, sending a command individually addressed to that device.
31. A system comprising:
an interrogator configured to communicate to a selected one or more of a number of communications devices; and
a plurality of communications devices; the devices being configured to select random values, wherein respective devices choose random values independently of random values selected by the other devices; the interrogator being configured to transmit a command requesting devices having random values within a specified group of a plurality of possible groups of random values to respond, the specified group being less than the entire set of random values, the plurality of possible groups being organized in a binary tree defined by a plurality of nodes at respective levels, the specified group being defined as being at one of the nodes; devices receiving the command being configured to respectively determine if their chosen random values fall within the specified group and, only if so, send a reply to the interrogator, wherein sending a reply to the interrogator comprises transmitting the unique identification number of the device sending the reply; the interrogator being configured to determine if a collision occurred between devices that sent a reply and, if so, create a new, smaller, specified group using a different level of the tree, the interrogator being configured to transmit a command requesting devices having random values within the new specified group of random values to respond; and, if not, the interrogator being configured to re-transmit a command requesting devices having random values within the first mentioned specified group of random values to respond.
32. A system in accordance with claim 31 wherein the first mentioned specified group contains both a device that is within communications range of the interrogator, and a device that is not within communications range of the interrogator.
33. A system in accordance with claim 31 wherein a device in the first mentioned specified group is capable of changing between being within communications range of the interrogator and not being within communications range of the interrogator over time.
34. A system in accordance with claim 31 wherein the respective devices comprise an integrated circuit including a receiver, a modulator, and a microprocessor in communication with the receiver and modulator.
35. A system comprising:
an interrogator configured to communicate to a selected one or more of a number of RFID devices;
a plurality of RFID devices, respective devices being configured to store a unique identification number, respective devices being further configured to store a random value;
the interrogator being configured to transmit a command requesting devices having random values within a specified group of a plurality of possible groups of random values to respond, the plurality of possible groups being organized in a binary tree defined by a plurality of nodes at respective levels, the specified group being defined as being at one of the nodes;
devices receiving the command respectively being configured to determine if their chosen random values fall within the specified group and, if so, send a reply to the interrogator; and, if not, not send a reply; and
the interrogator being configured to determine if a collision occurred between devices that sent a reply and, if so, to create a new, smaller, specified group by descending in the tree; and, if not, to transmit a command at the same node.
36. A system in accordance with claim 35 wherein the unique identification numbers for respective devices are stored in digital form and respectively comprise a predetermined number of bits.
37. A system in accordance with claim 35 wherein the random values for respective devices are stored in digital form and respectively comprise a predetermined number of bits.
38. A system in accordance with claim 35 wherein the interrogator is configured to determine if a collision occurred between devices that sent a reply in response to respective Identify commands and, if so, to create further new specified groups and repeat the transmitting of the command requesting devices having random values within a specified group of random values to respond using different specified groups until all responding devices capable of responding are identified.
39. A radio frequency identification (RFID) system, comprising:
a plurality of RFID tags; and
at least one interrogator, the interrogator to transmit a first request to the plurality of RFID tags, the first request specifying a first subgroup of a group of random numbers, among the plurality of RFID tags at least one RFID tag having generated a random number that is within the first subgroup to provide a first response, the interrogator to receive one or more responses, including the first response, from one or more of the plurality of RFID tags respectively, and the interrogator to repeat the first request if the first response is received without a detected collision.
40. The system of claim 39, wherein the first request includes a selection indicator; and the one or more of the plurality of RFID tags provides the one or more responses only if the selection indicator corresponds to one or more selection bits stored on the one or more of the plurality of RFID tags.
41. The system of claim 39, wherein the one or more of the plurality of RFID tags are configured to set an inventoried flag to a first state to indicate that a respective RFID tag has responded to the interrogator.
42. The system of claim 39, wherein the interrogator is configured to transmit a wake-up signal to cause the one or more of the plurality of RFID tags to transition from a battery-saving mode to an operational mode.
43. The system of claim 39, wherein the interrogator is configured to send a sleep command to the RFID tag that provides the first response.
44. The system of claim 39, wherein the first response includes the random number generated by the RFID tag that provides the first response; and the interrogator is to send at least one additional command to the RFID tag, the first RFID tag being identified in the at least one additional command by the random number.
45. A method implemented in a radio frequency identification (RFID) system having at least one RFID tag and at least one RFID interrogator, the method comprising:
generating random numbers at a plurality of RFID tags, including an RFID tag affixed to an object;
transmitting a first command from the interrogator to select RFID tags, including the RFID tag affixed to the object, that have generated random numbers that are within a subset of random numbers;
the selected RFID tags transmitting a response, including a random number generated by the RFID tag affixed to the object;
if the random number is received at the interrogator, retransmitting the first command.
46. The method of claim 45, wherein the selected RFID tags transmitting the response to indicate data stored on the selected RFID tags matches one or more selection bits specified by the first command.
47. The method of claim 45, wherein the RFID tag is further configured to communicate the response at a time based at least in part upon a random number.
48. The method of claim 45, further comprising transmitting a command to silence the RFID tag affixed to the object upon receiving the response.
49. An interrogator, comprising:
one or more antennas to poll a plurality of radio frequency identification (RFID) tags;
means for transmitting a first command to select a first subset of the plurality of RFID tags;
means for receiving one or more responses from the subset of RFID tags, the one or more responses including a random number generated at a first RFID tag of the plurality of RFID tags;
means for transmitting the first command if at least one of the one or more responses is received without a collision; and
means for transmitting a second command to select a second subset of the plurality of RFID tags if a collision is detected in the one or more responses.
50. The interrogator of claim 49, wherein the first command includes a selection indicator that identifies a class of one or more of a plurality of RFID tags from which a response is being requested.
51. The interrogator of claim 49, further comprising repeatedly redefining the subgroup to include fewer possible random numbers and transmitting a new request for RFID tags having a random number within the subgroup to respond until receiving a response without a collision or receiving no response.
52. A method implemented in a radio frequency identification (RFID) device, the method comprising:
receiving a first command, comprising a first set of bit values, from an interrogator to select the RFID device based on a comparison between the first set of bit values and data stored in the RFID device;
transmitting a response to the first command, the response including an identifier of the RFID device;
if the response is received at an interrogator, remaining silent when the first command is subsequently repeated; and
if the response is not received at the interrogator, retransmitting the response when the first command is subsequently repeated.
53. The method of claim 52, wherein transmitting the response is done in a randomly selected slot; and the method further comprises transmitting an identification code to identify a person with whom the RFID device is associated.
54. A method implemented in a radio frequency identification (RFID) system having an interrogator to poll a plurality of RFID tags, the method comprising:
transmitting a first command to select a first subset of RFID tags;
receiving one or more responses from the subset of RFID tags, the one or more responses including a random number generated at a first RFID tag of the plurality of RFID tags; and
retransmitting the first command if at least one of the one or more responses is received without a collision.
55. The method of claim 54, further comprising:
affixing the plurality of RFID tags to a plurality of objects to track as inventory is added and removed.
56. The method of claim 54, further comprising:
after receiving the one or more responses and prior to retransmitting the first command, transmitting a command to silence an RFID tag from which a response is received without a collision.
57. The method of claim 54, wherein the first command includes a selection indicator that identifies a class of one or more of a plurality of RFID tags from which a response is being requested.
58. The method of claim 54, further comprising repeatedly redefining the subgroup to include fewer possible random numbers and transmitting a new request for RFID tags having a random number within the subgroup to respond until receiving a response without a collision or receiving no response.
59. A radio frequency identification (RFID) device, comprising:
an antenna;
a receiver coupled to the antenna to receive a first command from an interrogator, the first command comprising a first value having multiple bits to select a group of one or more RFID devices in a field of the interrogator;
processing circuitry to determine if the RFID device is selected by the interrogator based on the first value; and
a transmitter to communicate a response to the first command in a first time slot with a first probability if the RFID device is selected by the interrogator in accordance with the first value, wherein the response includes an identifier of the RFID device and the first probability is indicated by the first command;
wherein if the first command, including the first value to select the group, is subsequently repeated by the interrogator while the RFID device remains within the field of the interrogator, the RFID device is configured to:
remain silent, if the response was received at the interrogator without detecting a collision, and
retransmit the response if the response was not received at the interrogator without detecting a collision.
60. The RFID device of claim 59, wherein the identifier comprises a random number generated by the RFID device.
61. The RFID device of claim 60, wherein the response includes the multiple bits of the first value.
62. The RFID device of claim 59, wherein the receiver is configured to receive signals each indicating a beginning of a time slot; and wherein the transmitter is configured to communicate the response to the first command in a selected one of a number of time slots indicated by the first command.
63. The RFID device of claim 59, wherein the response includes the multiple bits of the first value.
64. The RFID device of claim 59, wherein the RFID device is further configured to transmit an identification code to identify a person with whom the RFID device is associated.
65. The RFID device of claim 59, wherein the interrogator is to transmit the first command before the RFID device first communicates to the interrogator.
66. A radio frequency identification (RFID) interrogator, comprising:
an antenna;
a transmitter coupled to the antenna to transmit a first command comprising a value, having multiple bits, corresponding to a group of one or more RFID devices to be selected in a field of the interrogator;
a receiver to receive a response to the first command from an RFID device selected by the first command in accordance with the value, the response to include an identifier of the RFID device and to be received in a time slot in accordance with a time slot method; and
processing circuitry to determine if the response is received without a collision, and if so, to transmit a second command to silence the RFID device and to retransmit the first command, including the value, to reselect the group to respond to the first command.
67. The interrogator of claim 66, wherein the identifier comprises a random number generated by the RFID device.
68. The interrogator of claim 66, wherein the receiver is to receive the response in a first time slot with a first probability in accordance with the time slot method.
69. The interrogator of claim 66, wherein the receiver is to further receive an identification code from the RFID device to identify a person with whom the RFID device is associated.
70. The interrogator of claim 66, wherein the response includes the multiple bits of the value.
71. The interrogator of claim 66, wherein the transmitter is to transmit the first command after the RFID device enters the field of the interrogator but before the RFID device communicates any responses to the interrogator.
72. A method comprising:
transmitting from an interrogator a first command, including a first identifier comprising a plurality of bits, to select a set of one or more RFID devices, corresponding to the first identifier, in a field of the interrogator, and to request the set to respond in accordance with a time slot method in which an RFID device responds in a first time slot with a probability indicated by the first command;
receiving a first response to the first command from a first RFID device of the set, wherein the first response is received in a time slot in accordance with the time slot method and the first response includes a second identifier of the RFID device;
detecting no collision in the first response from the first RFID device; and
retransmitting from the interrogator the first command, including the first identifier, to select the set of one or more RFID devices and to request the set to respond while the set remains in the field of the interrogator.
73. The method of claim 72, wherein the second identifier comprises a random number generated by the RFID device.
74. The method of claim 72, further comprising transmitting a plurality of signals from the interrogator, each of the plurality of signals defining the start of a time slot in accordance with the time slot method.
75. The method of claim 72, further comprising transmitting from the interrogator a second command, wherein the second command indicates a change in the probability.
76. The method of claim 72, wherein the response includes the plurality of bits of the first identifier.
77. The method of claim 72, further comprising:
receiving an identification code from the RFID device to identify a person with whom the RFID device is associated.
78. The method of claim 72, wherein transmitting the first command is performed after the RFID device enters the field of the interrogator but before the RFID device communicates any signals to the interrogator.
79. A radio frequency identification (RFID) system, comprising:
an interrogator to transmit a first command to select a group of one or more RFID devices in a field of the interrogator, wherein the first command includes a first identifier, comprising a plurality of bits, that corresponds to the group of one or more RFID devices; and
an RFID device in the field of the interrogator to determine, using the first identifier, if the RFID device is selected as one of the group, and if so, to communicate a response to the first command in a first time slot with a first probability, wherein the response includes a second identifier of the RFID device;
wherein the interrogator is to retransmit the first command, including the first identifier, after the interrogator receives the response, without a collision, from the RFID device and while the group remains in the field of the interrogator.
80. The system of claim 79, wherein the interrogator is configured to transmit a plurality of signals, each defining a start of a time slot for one or more responses to the first command, and the RFID device is configured to transmit the response to the first command in a randomly selected time slot.
81. The system of claim 79, wherein the response from the first RFID device includes the plurality of bits of the first identifier.
82. The system of claim 79, wherein the second identifier comprises a random number generated by the RFID device.
83. The system of claim 79, wherein the RFID device stores an identification code that identifies an associated person.
84. The system of claim 79, wherein the first probability is indicated by the first command.
85. The system of claim 79, wherein the interrogator is to transmit the first command after the RFID device enters the field of the interrogator but before the RFID device subsequently communicates to the interrogator.
Description
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

ThisMore than one reissue application has been filed for the reissue of U.S. Pat. No. 6,282,186, which The reissue applications are the initial reissue application Ser. No. 10/652,573 filed Aug. 28, 2003, a continuation reissue application Ser. No. 11/862,121, filed Sep. 26, 2007, a continuation reissue application Ser. No. 11/862,130, filed Sep. 26, 2007, and the present continuation reissue application, which is a Continuationcontinuation application of a reissue application Ser. No. 10/652,573, filed Aug. 28, 2003, which is a reissue application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/556,235, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,282,186, which is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/026,050, filed Feb. 19, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,061,344 and titled “Method of Addressing Messages and Communications System”.

TECHNICAL FIELD

This invention relates to communications protocols and to digital data communications. Still more particularly, the invention relates to data communications protocols in mediums such as radio communication or the like. The invention also relates to radio frequency identification devices for inventory control, object monitoring, determining the existence, location or movement of objects, or for remote automated payment.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Communications protocols are used in various applications. For example, communications protocols can be used in electronic identification systems. As large numbers of objects are moved in inventory, product manufacturing, and merchandising operations, there is a continuous challenge to accurately monitor the location and flow of objects. Additionally, there is a continuing goal to interrogate the location of objects in an inexpensive and streamlined manner. One way of tracking objects is with an electronic identification system.

One presently available electronic identification system utilizes a magnetic coupling system. In some cases, an identification device may be provided with a unique identification code in order to distinguish between a number of different devices. Typically, the devices are entirely passive (have no power supply), which results in a small and portable package. However, such identification systems are only capable of operation over a relatively short range, limited by the size of a magnetic field used to supply power to the devices and to communicate with the devices.

Another wireless electronic identification system utilizes a large, board level, active transponder device affixed to an object to be monitored which receives a signal from an interrogator. The device receives the signal, then generates and transmits a responsive signal. The interrogation signal and the responsive signal are typically radio-frequency (RF) signals produced by an RF transmitter circuit. Because active devices have their own power sources, and do not need to be in close proximity to an interrogator or reader to receive power via magnetic coupling. Therefore, active transponder devices tend to be more suitable for applications requiring tracking of a tagged device that may not be in close proximity to an interrogator. For example, active transponder devices tend to be more suitable for inventory control or tracking.

Electronic identification systems can also be used for remote payment. For example, when a radio frequency identification device passes an interrogator at a toll booth, the toll booth can determine the identity of the radio frequency identification device, and thus of the owner of the device, and debit an account held by the owner for payment of toll or can receive a credit card number against which the toll can be charged. Similarly, remote payment is possible for a variety of other goods or services.

A communication system typically includes two transponders: a commander station or interrogator, and a responder station or transponder device which replies to the interrogator.

If the interrogator has prior knowledge of the identification number of a device which the interrogator is looking for, it can specify that a response is requested only from the device with that identification number. Sometimes, such information is not available. For example, there are occasions where the interrogator is attempting to determine which of multiple devices are within communication range.

When the interrogator sends a message to a transponder device requesting a reply, there is a possibility that multiple transponder devices will attempt to respond simultaneously, causing a collision, and thus causing an erroneous message to be received by the interrogator. For example, if the interrogator sends out a command requesting that all devices within a communications range identify themselves, and gets a large number of simultaneous replies, the interrogator may not be able to interpret any of these replies. Thus, arbitration schemes are employed to permit communications free of collisions.

In one arbitration scheme or system, described in commonly assigned U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,627,544; 5,583,850; 5,500,650; and 5,365,551, all to Snodgrass et al. and all incorporated herein by reference, the interrogator sends a command causing each device of a potentially large number of responding devices to select a random number from a known range and use it as that device's arbitration number. By transmitting requests for identification to various subsets of the full range of arbitration numbers, and checking for an error-free response, the interrogator determines the arbitration number of every responder station capable of communicating at the same time. Therefore, the interrogator is able to conduct subsequent uninterrupted communication with devices, one at a time, by addressing only one device.

Another arbitration scheme is referred to as the Aloha or slotted Aloha scheme. This scheme is discussed in various references relating to communications, such as Digital Communications: Fundamentals and Application, Bernard Sklar, published January 1988 by Prentice Hall. In this type of scheme, a device will respond to an interrogator using one of many time domain slots selected randomly by the device. A problem with the Aloha scheme is that if there are many devices, or potentially many devices in the field (i.e. in communications range, capable of responding) then there must be many available slots or many collisions will occur. Having many available slots slows down replies. If the magnitude of the number of devices in a field is unknown, then many slots are needed. This results in the system slowing down significantly because the reply time equals the number of slots multiplied by the time period required for one reply.

An electronic identification system which can be used as a radio frequency identification device, arbitration schemes, and various applications for such devices are described in detail in commonly assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/705,043, filed Aug. 29, 1996 and now U.S. Pat. No. 6,130,602, and incorporated herein by reference.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The invention provides a wireless identification device configured to provide a signal to identify the device in response to an interrogation signal.

One aspect of the invention provides a method implemented in an RFID device. The method includes: receiving a first command, comprising a first set of bit values, from an interrogator to select the RFID device based on a comparison between the first set of bit values and data stored in the RFID device, transmitting a response to the first command, the response including an identifier of the RFID device; if the response is received at an interrogator, remaining silent when the first command is subsequently repeated; and if the response is not received at the interrogator, re-transmitting the response when the first command is subsequently repeated.

One aspect of the invention provides a method of establishing wireless communications between an interrogator and individual ones of multiple wireless identification devices. The method comprises utilizing a tree search method to attempt to identify individual ones of the multiple wireless identification devices so as to be able to perform communications, without collision, between the interrogator and individual ones of the multiple wireless identification devices. A search tree is defined for the tree search method. The tree has multiple nodes respectively representing subgroups of the multiple wireless identification devices. The interrogator transmits a command at a node, requesting that devices within the subgroup represented by the node respond. The interrogator determines if a collision occurs in response to the command and, if not, repeats the command at the same node.

Another aspect of the invention provides a communications system comprising an interrogator, and a plurality of wireless identification devices configured to communicate with the interrogator in a wireless fashion. The interrogator is configured to employ tree searching to attempt to identify individual ones of the multiple wireless identification devices, so as to be able to perform communications without collision, between the interrogator and individual ones of the multiple wireless identification devices. The interrogator is configured to follow a search tree, the tree having multiple nodes respectively representing subgroups of the multiple wireless identification devices. The interrogator is configured to transmit a command at a node, requesting that devices within the subgroup represented by the node respond. The interrogator is further configured to determine if a collision occurs in response to the command and, if not, to repeat the command at the same node.

One aspect of the invention provides a radio frequency identification device comprising an integrated circuit including a receiver, a transmitter, and a microprocessor. In one embodiment, the integrated circuit is a monolithic single die single metal layer integrated circuit including the receiver, the transmitter, and the microprocessor. The device of this embodiment includes an active transponder, instead of a transponder which relies on magnetic coupling for power and therefore has a much greater range.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Preferred embodiments of the invention are described below with reference to the following accompanying drawings.

FIG. 1 is a high level circuit schematic showing an interrogator and a radio frequency identification device embodying the invention.

FIG. 2 is a front view of a housing, in the form of a badge or card, supporting the circuit of FIG. 1 according to one embodiment the invention.

FIG. 3 is a front view of a housing supporting the circuit of FIG. 1 according to another embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating a tree splitting sort method for establishing communication with a radio frequency identification device in a field of a plurality of such devices.

FIG. 5. is a diagram illustrating a modified tree splitting sort method for establishing communication with a radio frequency identification device in a field of a plurality of such devices.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

This disclosure of the invention is submitted in furtherance of the constitutional purposes of the U.S. Patent Laws “to promote the progress of science and useful arts” (Article 1, Section 8).

FIG. 1 illustrates a wireless identification device 12 in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. In the illustrated embodiment, the wireless identification device is a radio frequency data communication device 12, and includes RFID circuitry 16. The device 12 further includes at least one antenna 14 connected to the circuitry 16 for wireless or radio frequency transmission and reception by the circuitry 16. In the illustrated embodiment, the RFID circuitry is defined by an integrated circuit as described in the above-incorporated patent application Ser. No. 08/705,043, filed Aug. 29, 1996 and now U.S. Pat. No. 6,130,602. Other embodiments are possible. A power source or supply 18 is connected to the integrated circuit 16 to supply power to the integrated circuit 16. In one embodiment, the power source 18 comprises a battery.

The device 12 transmits and receives radio frequency communications to and from an interrogator 26. An exemplary interrogator is described in commonly assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/907,689, filed Aug. 8, 1997 and now U.S. Pat. No. 6,289,209, which is incorporated herein by reference. Preferably, the interrogator 26 includes an antenna 28, as well as dedicated transmitting and receiving circuitry, similar to that implemented on the integrated circuit 16.

Generally, the interrogator 26 transmits an interrogation signal or command 27 via the antenna 28. The device 12 receives the incoming interrogation signal via its antenna 14. Upon receiving the signal 27, the device 12 responds by generating and transmitting a responsive signal or reply 29. The responsive signal 29 typically includes information that uniquely identifies, or labels the particular device 12 that is transmitting, so as to identify any object or person with which the device 12 is associated. Although only one device 12 is shown in FIG. 1, typically there will be multiple devices 12 that correspond with the interrogator 26, and the particular devices 12 that are in communication with the interrogator 26 will typically change over time. In the illustrated embodiment in FIG. 1, there is no communication between multiple devices 12. Instead, the devices 12 respectively communicate with the interrogator 26. Multiple devices 12 can be used in the same field of an interrogator 26 (i.e., within communications range of an interrogator 26).

The radio frequency data communication device 12 can be included in any appropriate housing or packaging. Various methods of manufacturing housings are described in commonly assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/800,037, filed Feb. 13, 1997, and now U.S. Pat. No. 5,988,510, which is incorporated herein by reference.

FIG. 2 shows but one embodiment in the form of a card or badge 19 including a housing 11 of plastic or other suitable material supporting the device 12 and the power supply 18. In one embodiment, the front face of the badge has visual identification features such as graphics, text, information found on identification or credit cards, etc.

FIG. 3 illustrates but one alternative housing supporting the device 12. More particularly, FIG. 3 shows a miniature housing 20 encasing the device 12 and power supply 18 to define a tag which can be supported by an object (e.g., hung from an object, affixed to an object, etc.). Although two particular types of housings have been disclosed, other forms of housings are employed in alternative embodiments.

If the power supply 18 is a battery, the battery can take any suitable form. Preferably, the battery type will be selected depending on weight, size, and life requirements for a particular application. In one embodiment, the battery 18 is a thin profile button-type cell forming a small, thin energy cell more commonly utilized in watches and small electronic devices requiring a thin profile. A conventional button-type cell has a pair of electrodes, an anode formed by one face and a cathode formed by an opposite face. In an alternative embodiment, the power source 18 comprises a series connected pair of button type cells. In other alternative embodiments, other types of suitable power source are employed.

The circuitry 16 further includes a backscatter transmitter and is configured to provide a responsive signal to the interrogator 26 by radio frequency. More particularly, the circuitry 16 includes a transmitter, a receiver, and memory such as is described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/705,043, filed Aug. 29, 1996 and now U.S. Pat. No. 6,130,602.

Radio frequency identification has emerged as a viable and affordable alternative to tagging or labeling small to large quantities of items. The interrogator 26 communicates with the devices 12 via an electromagnetic link, such as via an RF link (e.g., at microwave frequencies, in one embodiment), so all transmissions by the interrogator 26 are heard simultaneously by all devices 12 within range.

If the interrogator 26 sends out a command requesting that all devices 12 within range identify themselves, and gets a large number of simultaneous replies, the interrogator 26 may not be able to interpret any of these replies. Therefore, arbitration schemes are provided.

If the interrogator 26 has prior knowledge of the identification number of a device 12 which the interrogator 26 is looking for, it can specify that a response is requested only from the device 12 with that identification number. To target a command at a specific device 12, (i.e., to initiate point-on-point communication), the interrogator 26 must send a number identifying a specific device 12 along with the command. At start-up, or in a new or changing environment, these identification numbers are not known by the interrogator 26. Therefore, the interrogator 26 must identify all devices 12 in the field (within communication range) such as by determining the identification numbers of the devices 12 in the field. After this is accomplished, point-to-point communication can proceed as desired by the interrogator 26.

Generally speaking, RFID systems are a type of multiaccess communication system. The distance between the interrogator 26 and devices 12 within the field is typically fairly short (e.g., several meters), so packet transmission time is determined primarily by packet size and baud rate. Propagation delays are negligible. In such systems, there is a potential for a large number of transmitting devices 12 and there is a need for the interrogator 26 to work in a changing environment, where different devices 12 are swapped in and out frequently (e.g., as inventory is added or removed). In such systems, the inventors have determined that the use of random access methods work effectively for contention resolution (i.e., for dealing with collisions between devices 12 attempting to respond to the interrogator 26 at the same time).

RFID systems have some characteristics that are different from other communications systems. For example, one characteristic of the illustrated RFID systems is that the devices 12 never communicate without being prompted by the interrogator 26. This is in contrast to typical multiaccess systems where the transmitting units operate more independently. In addition, contention for the communication medium is short lived as compared to the ongoing nature of the problem in other multiaccess systems. For example, in a RFID system, after the devices 12 have been identified, the interrogator can communicate with them in a point-to-point fashion. Thus, arbitration in a RFID system is a transient rather than steady-state phenomenon. Further, the capability of a device 12 is limited by practical restrictions on size, power, and cost. The lifetime of a device 12 can often be measured in terms of number of transmissions before battery power is lost. Therefore, one of the most important measures of system performance in RFID arbitration is total time required to arbitrate a set of devices 12. Another measure is power consumed by the devices 12 during the process. This is in contrast to the measures of throughput and packet delay in other types of multiaccess systems.

FIG. 4 illustrates one arbitration scheme that can be employed for communication between the interrogator and devices 12. Generally, the interrogator 26 sends a command causing each device 12 of a potentially large number of responding devices 12 to select a random number from a known range and use it as that device's arbitration number. By transmitting requests for identification to various subsets of the full range of arbitration numbers, and checking for an error-free response, the interrogator 26 determines the arbitration number of every responder station capable of communicating at the same time. Therefore, the interrogator 26 is able to conduct subsequent unterrupted communication with devices 12, one at a time, by addressing only one device 12.

Three variables are used: an arbitration value (AVALUE), an arbitration mask (AMASK), and a random value ID (RV). The interrogator sends an Identify command (IdentifyCmnd) causing each device of a potentially large number of responding devices to select a random number from a known range and use it as that device's arbitration number. The interrogator sends an arbitration value (AVALUE) and an arbitration mask (AMASK) to a set of devices 12. The receiving devices 12 evaluate the following equation: (AMASK & AVALUE)==(AMASK & RV) wherein “&” is a bitwise AND function, and wherein “==” is an equality function. If the equation evaluates to “1” (TRUE), then the device 12 will reply. If the equation evaluates to “0” (FALSE), then the device 12 will not reply. By performing this in a structured manner, with the number of bits in the arbitration mask being increased by one each time, eventually a device 12 will respond with no collisions. Thus, a binary search tree methodology is employed.

An example using actual numbers will now be provided using only four bits, for simplicity, reference being made to FIG. 4. In one embodiment, sixteen bits are used for AVALUE and AMASK. Other numbers of bits can also be employed depending, for example, on the number of devices 12 expected to be encountered in a particular application, on desired cost points, etc.

Assume, for this example, that there are two devices 12 in the field, one with a random value RV) of 1100 (binary), and another with a random value (RV) of 1010 (binary). The interrogator is tying to establish communications without collisions being caused by the two devices 12 attempting to communicate at the same time.

The interrogator sets AVALUE to 0000 (or “don't care” for all bits, as indicated by the character “X” in FIG. 4) and AMASK to 0000. The interrogator transmits a command to all devices 12 requesting that they identify themselves. Each of the devices 12 evaluate (AMASK & AVALUE)==(AMASK & RV) using the random value RV that the respective devices 12 selected. If the equation evaluates to “1” (TRUE), then the device 12 will reply. If the equation evaluates to “0” (FALSE), then the device 12 will not reply. In the first level of the illustrated tree, AMASK is 0000 and anything bitwise ANDed with all zeros results in all zeros, so both the devices 12 in the field respond, and there is a collision.

Next, the interrogator sets AMASK to 0001 and AVALUE to 0000 and transmits an Identify command. Both devices 12 in the field have a zero for their least significant bit, and (AMASK & AVALUE)==(AMASK & RV) will be true for both devices 12. For the device 12 with a random value of 1100, the left side of the equation is evaluated as follows (0001 & 0000)=0000.

The right side is evaluated as (0001 & 1100)=0000. The left side equals the right side, so the equation is true for the device 12 with the random value of 1100. For the device 12 with a random value of 1010, the left side of the equation is evaluated as (0001 & 0000)=0000. The right side is evaluated as (0001 & 1010)=0000. The left side equals the right side, so the equation is true for the device 12 with the random value of 1010. Because the equation is true for both devices 12 in the field, both devices 12 in the field respond, and there is another collision.

Recursively, the interrogator next sets AMASK to 0011 with AVALUE still at 0000 and transmits an Identify command. (AMASK & AVALUE)==(AMASK & RV) is evaluated for both devices 12. For the device 12 with a random value of 1100, the leftside of the equation is evaluated as follows (0011 & 0000)=0000. The right side is evaluated as (0011 & 1100)=0000. The left side equals the right side, so the equation is true for the device 12 with the random value of 1100, so this device 12 responds. For the device 12 with a random value of 1010, the left side of the equation is evaluated as (0011 & 0000)=0000. The right side is evaluated as (0011 & 1010)=0010. The left side does not equal the right side, so the equation is false for the device 12 with the random value of 1010, and this device 12 does not respond; Therefore, there is no collision, and the interrogator can determine the identity (e.g., an identification number) for the device 12 that does respond.

De-recursion takes place, and the devices 12 to the right for the same AMASK level are accessed when AVALUE is set at 0010, and AMASK is set to 0011.

The device 12 with the random value of 1010 receives a command and evaluates the equation (AMASK & AVALUE)==(AMASK & RV). The left side of the equation is evaluated as (0011 & 0010)=0010. The right side of the equation is evaluated as (0011 & 1010)=0010. The right side equals the left side, so the equation is true for the device 12 with the random value of 1010. Because there are no other devices 12 in the subtree, a good reply is returned by the device 12 with the random value of 1010. There is no collision, and the interrogator 26 can determine the identity (e.g., an identification number) for the device 12 that does respond.

By recursion, what is meant is that a function makes a call to itself. In other words, the function calls itself within the body of the function. After the called function returns, de-recursion takes place and execution continues at the place just after the function call; i.e. at the beginning of the statement after the function call.

For instance, consider a function that has four statements (numbered 1,2,3,4) in it, and the second statement is a recursive call. Assume that the fourth statement is a return statement. The first time through the loop (iteration 1) the function executes the statement 2 and (because it is a recursive call) calls itself causing iteration 2 to occur. When iteration 2 gets to statement 2, it calls itself making iteration 3. During execution in iteration 3 of statement 1, assume that the function does a return. The information that was saved on the stack from iteration 2 is loaded and the function resumes execution at statement 3 (in iteration 2), followed by the execution of statement 4 which is also a return statement. Since there are no more statements in the function, the function de-recurses to iteration 1. Iteration 1, had previously recursively called itself in statement 2. Therefore, it now executes statement 3 (in iteration 1). Following that it executes a return at statement 4. Recursion is known in the art.

Consider the following code which can be used to implement operation of the method shown in FIG. 4 and described above.

Arbitrate(AMASK,AVALUE)
{
collision=IdentifyCmnd(AMASK, AVALUE) if
(collision) then
{
/* recursive call for left side */ Arbitrate
((AMASK<<1)+1, AVALUE
/* recursive call for right side */ Arbitrate
((AMASK<<1)+1, AVALUE+(AMASK+1))
} /* endif */
}/* return */

The symbol “<<” represents a bitwise left shift. “<<1” means shift left by one place. Thus, 0001<<1 would be 0010. Note, however, that AMASK is originally called with a value of zero, and 0000<<1 is still 0000. Therefore, for the first recursive call, AMASK=(AMASK<<1)+1. So for the first recursive call, the value of AMASK is 0000+0001=0001. For the second call, AMASK=(0001<<)+1=0010+1=0011. For the third recursive call, AMASK=(0011<<1)+1=0110+1=0111.

The routine generates values for AMASK and AVALUE to be used by the interrogator in an Identify command “IdentifyCmnd.” Note that the routine calls itself if there is a collision. De-recursion occurs when there is no collision. AVALUE and AMASK would have values such as the following assuming collisions take place all the way down to the bottom of the tree.

AVALUE AMASK
0000 0000
0000 0001
0000 0011
0000 0111
0000  1111*
1000  1111*
0100 0111
0100  1111*
1100  1111*

This sequence of AMASK, AVALUE binary numbers assumes that there are collisions all the way down to the bottom of the tree, at which point the Identify command sent by the interrogator is finally successful so that no collision occurs. Rows in the table for which the interrogator is successful in receiving a reply without collision are marked with the symbol “*”. Note that if the Identify command was successful at, for example, the third line in the table then the interrogator would stop going down that branch of the tree and start down another, so the sequence would be as shown in the following table.

AVALUE AMASK
0000 0000
0000 0001
0000  0011*
0010 0011
. . . . . .

This method is referred to as a splitting method. It works by splitting groups of colliding devices 12 into subsets that are resolved in turn. The splitting method can also be viewed as a type of tree search. Each split moves the method one level deeper in the tree. Either depth-first or breadth-first traversals of the tree can be employed. Depth first traversals are performed by using recursion, as is employed in the code listed above. Breadth-first traversals are accomplished by using a queue instead of recursion.

Either depth-first or breadth-first traversals of the tree can be employed. Depth first traversals are performed by using recursion, as is employed in the code listed above. Breadth-first traversals are accomplished by using a queue instead of recursion. The following is an example of code for performing a breadth-first traversal.

Arbitrate(AMASK,AVALUE)
{
enqueue(0,0)
while (queue != empty)
(AMASK,AVALTE)=dequeue( )
collision=IdentifyCmnd(AMASK, AVALUE)
if (collision) then
{
TEMP = AMASK+1
NEW_AMASK = (AMASK<<1)+1
enqueue(NEW_AMASK, AVALUE)
enqueue(NEW_AMASK, AVALUE+TEMP)
} /* endif */
endwhile
}/* return */

The symbol “!=” means not equal to. AVALUE and AMASK would have values such as those indicated in the following table for such code.

AVALUE AMASK
0000 0000
0000 0001
0001 0001
0000 0011
0010 0011
0001 0011
0011 0011
0000 0111
0100 0111
. . . . . .

Rows in the table for which the interrogator is successful in receiving a reply without collision are marked with the symbol “*”.

FIG. 5 illustrates an embodiment wherein the interrogator 26 retries on the same node that yielded a good reply. The search tree has a plurality of nodes 51, 52, 53, 54 etc. at respective levels 32, 34, 36, 38, or 40. The size of subgroups of random values decrease in size by half with each node descended.

The interrogator performs a tree search, either depth-first or breadth-first in a manner such as that described in connection with FIG. 4, except that if the interrogator determines that no collision occurred in response to an Identify command, the interrogator repeats the command at the same node. This takes advantage of an inherent capability of the devices, particularly if the devices use backscatter communication, called self-arbitration. Arbitration times can be reduced, and battery life for the devices can be increased.

When a single reply is read by the interrogator, for example, in node 52, the method described in connection with FIG. 4 would involve proceeding to node 53 and then sending another Identify command. Because a device 12 in a field of devices 12 can override weaker devices, this embodiment is modified such that the interrogator retries on the same node 52 after silencing the device 12 that gave the good reply. Thus, after receiving a good reply from node 52, the interrogator remains on node 52 and reissues the Identify command after silencing the device that first responded on node 52. Repeating the Identify command on the same node often yields other good replies, thus taking advantage of the devices natural ability to self-arbitrate.

AVALUE and AMASK would have values such as the following for a depth-first traversal in a situation similar to the one described above in connection with FIG. 4.

AVALUE AMASK
0000 0000
0000 0001
0000 0011
0000 0111
0000  1111*
0000  1111*
1000  1111*
1000  1111*
0100 0111
0100  1111*
0100  1111*
1100  1111*
1100  1111*

Rows in the table for which the interrogator is successful in receiving a reply without collision are marked with the symbol “*”.

In operation, the interrogator transmits a command at a node, requesting that devices within the subgroup represented by the node respond. The interrogator determines if a collision occurs in response to the command and, if not, repeats the command at the same node.

In one alternative embodiment, the upper bound of the number of devices in the field (the maximum possible number of devices that could communicate with the interrogator) is determined, and the tree search method is started at a level 32, 34, 36, 38, or 40 in the tree depending on the determined upper bound. The level of the search tree on which to start the tree search is selected based on the determined maximum possible number of wireless identification devices that could communicate with the interrogator. The tree search is started at a level determined by taking the base two logarithm of the determined maximum possible number. More particularly, the tree search is started at a level determined by taking the base two logarithm of the power of two nearest the determined maximum possible number of devices 12. The level of the tree containing all subgroups of random values is considered level zero, and lower levels are numbered 1, 2, 3, 4, etc. consecutively.

Methods involving determining the upper bound on a set of devices and starting at a level in the tree depending on the determined upper bound are described in a commonly assigned patent application (attorney docket MI40-118) naming Clifton W. Wood, Jr. as an inventor, titled “Method of Addressing Messages and Communications System,” filed concurrently herewith, andSer. No. 09/026,043, filed Feb. 19, 1998 and now U.S. Pat. No. 6,118,789, which is incorporated herein by reference.

In one alternative embodiment, a method involving starting at a level in the tree depending on a determined upper bound (such as the method described in the commonly assigned patent application mentioned above) is combined with a method comprising re-trying on the same node that gave a good reply, such as the method shown and described in connection with FIG. 5.

Another arbitration method that can be employed is referred to as the “Aloha” method. In the Aloha method, every time a device 12 is involved in a collision, it waits a random period of time before retransmitting. This method can be improved by dividing time into equally sized slots and forcing transmissions to be aligned with one of these lots. This is referred to as “slotted Aloha.” In operation, the interrogator asks all devices 12 in the field to transmit their identification numbers in the next time slot. If the response is garbled, the interrogator informs the devices 12 that a collision has occurred, and the slotted Aloha scheme is put into action. This means that each device 12 in the field responds within an arbitrary slot determined by a randomly selected value. In other words, in each successive time slot, the devices 12 decide to transmit their identification number with a certain probability.

The Aloha method is based on a system operated by the University of Hawaii. In 1971, the University of Hawaii began operation of a system named Aloha. A communication satellite was used to interconnect several university computers by use of a random access protocol. The system operates as follows. Users or devices transmit at any time they desire. After transmitting, a user listens for an acknowledgment from the receiver or interrogator. Transmissions from different users will sometimes overlap in time (collide), causing reception errors in the data in each of the contending messages. The errors are detected by the receiver, and the receiver sends a negative acknowledgment to the users. When a negative acknowledgment is received, the messages are retransmitted by the colliding users after a random delay. If the colliding users attempted to retransmit without the random delay, they would collide again. If the user does not receive either an acknowledgment or a negative acknowledgment within a certain amount of time, the user “times out” and retransmits the message.

There is a scheme known as slotted Aloha which improves the Aloha scheme by requiring a small amount of coordination among stations. In the slotted Aloha scheme, a sequence of coordination pulses is broadcast to all stations (devices). As is the case with the pure Aloha scheme, packet lengths are constant. Messages are required to be sent in a slot time between synchronization pulses, and can be started only at the beginning of a time slot. This reduces the rate of collisions because only messages transmitted in the same slot can interfere with one another. The retransmission mode of the pure 11 Aloha scheme is modified for slotted Aloha such that if a negative acknowledgment occurs, the device retransmits after a random delay of an integer number of slot times.

Aloha methods are described in a commonly assigned patent application (attorney docket MI40-089) naming Clifton W. Wood, Jr. as an inventor, titled “Method of Addressing Messages and Communications System,” filed concurrently herewith, andSer. No. 09/026,248, filed Feb. 19, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,275,476, which is incorporated herein by reference.

In one alternative embodiment, an Aloha method (such as the method described in the commonly assigned patent application mentioned above) is combined with a method involving re-trying on the same node that gave a good reply, such as the method shown and described in connection with FIG. 5.

In another embodiment, levels of the search tree are skipped. Skipping levels in the tree, after a collision caused by multiple devices 12 responding, reduces the number of subsequent collisions without adding significantly to the number of no replies. In real-time systems, it is desirable to have quick arbitration sessions on a set of devices 12 whose unique identification numbers are unknown. Level skipping reduces the number of collisions, both reducing arbitration time and conserving battery life on a set of devices 12. In one embodiment, every other level is skipped. In alternative embodiments, more than one level is skipped each time.

The trade off that must be considered in determining how many (if any) levels to skip with each decent down the tree is as follows. Skipping levels reduces the number of collisions, thus saving battery power in the devices 12. Skipping deeper (skipping more than one level) further reduces the number of collisions. The more levels that are skipped, the greater the reduction in collisions. However, skipping levels results in longer search times because the number of queries (Identify commands) increases. The more levels that are skipped, the longer the search times. Skipping just one level has an almost negligible effect on search time, but drastically reduces the number of collisions. If more than one level is skipped, search time increases substantially. Skipping every other level drastically reduces the number of collisions and saves battery power without significantly increasing the number of queries.

Level skipping methods are described in a commonly assigned patent application (attorney docket MI40-117) naming Clifton W. Wood, Jr. and Don Hush as inventors, titled “Method of Addressing Messages, Method of Establishing Wireless Communications, and Communications System,” filed concurrently herewith, andSer. No. 09/026,045, filed Feb. 19, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,072,801, which is incorporated herein by reference.

In one alternative embodiment, a level skipping method is combined with a method involving re-trying on the same node that gave a good reply, such as the method shown and described in connection with FIG. 5.

In yet another alternative embodiment, any two or more of the methods described in the commonly assigned, concurrently filed, applications mentioned above are combined.

In compliance with the statute, the invention has been described in language more or less specific as to structural and methodical features. It is to be understood, however, that the invention is not limited to the specific features shown and described, since the means herein disclosed comprise preferred forms of putting the invention into effect. The invention is, therefore, claimed in any of its forms or modifications within the proper scope of the appended claims appropriately interpreted in accordance with the doctrine of equivalents.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US4075632May 24, 1976Feb 21, 1978The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of EnergyInterrogation, and detection system
US4761778Apr 11, 1985Aug 2, 1988Massachusetts Institute Of TechnologyCoder-packetizer for random accessing in digital communication with multiple accessing
US4796023Dec 5, 1986Jan 3, 1989King Robert EStabilized binary tree protocol
US4799059Mar 14, 1986Jan 17, 1989Enscan, Inc.Automatic/remote RF instrument monitoring system
US4845504Apr 8, 1987Jul 4, 1989M/A-Com, Inc.Mobile radio network for nationwide communications
US4862453Oct 2, 1987Aug 29, 1989The Marconi Company LimitedCommunication system
US4926182May 29, 1987May 15, 1990Sharp Kabushiki KaishaMicrowave data transmission apparatus
US4955018Nov 8, 1988Sep 4, 1990Echelon Systems CorporationProtocol for network having plurality of intelligent cells
US4969146Nov 8, 1988Nov 6, 1990Echelon Systems CorporationProtocol for network having a plurality of intelligent cells
US5019813Apr 12, 1988May 28, 1991N.V. Nederlandsche Apparatenfabriek NedapSystem for the contactless exchange of data
US5025486Dec 9, 1988Jun 18, 1991Dallas Semiconductor CorporationWireless communication system with parallel polling
US5046066Feb 12, 1987Sep 3, 1991Telesystems Slw Inc.Wireless local area network
US5055968Jul 3, 1989Oct 8, 1991Sony CorporationThin electronic device having an integrated circuit chip and a power battery and a method for producing same
US5121407Sep 27, 1990Jun 9, 1992Pittway CorporationSpread spectrum communications system
US5124697Oct 16, 1989Jun 23, 1992Motorola, Inc.Method for acknowledging the reception of an address signal
US5142694Jul 24, 1989Aug 25, 1992Motorola, Inc.Reporting unit
US5144313Apr 24, 1991Sep 1, 1992Steffen KirknesMethod for processing transmitted and reflected signals for removing unwanted signals and noise from wanted signals
US5144668Jan 25, 1991Sep 1, 1992Motorola, Inc.Signal overlap detection in a communication system
US5150114Nov 6, 1990Sep 22, 1992U.S. Philips CorporationPolling-type information transmission system
US5150310Aug 30, 1989Sep 22, 1992Consolve, Inc.Method and apparatus for position detection
US5164985Oct 26, 1988Nov 17, 1992Nysen Paul APassive universal communicator system
US5168510Apr 5, 1989Dec 1, 1992Comsource SystemsSpread spectrum-time diversity communications systems and transceivers for multidrop area networks
US5194860Nov 15, 1990Mar 16, 1993The General Electric Company, P.L.C.Radio telemetry systems with channel selection
US5231646Mar 16, 1992Jul 27, 1993Kyros CorporationCommunications system
US5266925Sep 30, 1991Nov 30, 1993Westinghouse Electric Corp.Electronic identification tag interrogation method
US5307463Dec 7, 1992Apr 26, 1994Allen-Bradley Company, Inc.Programmable controller communication module
US5365551Dec 15, 1992Nov 15, 1994Micron Technology, Inc.Data communication transceiver using identification protocol
US5373503Apr 30, 1993Dec 13, 1994Information Technology, Inc.Group randomly addressed polling method
US5449296Mar 7, 1994Sep 12, 1995Cabel-Con, Inc. UsaCable connector apparatus for preventing radiation leakage
US5461627Dec 24, 1991Oct 24, 1995Rypinski; Chandos A.Access protocol for a common channel wireless network
US5479416Sep 30, 1993Dec 26, 1995Micron Technology, Inc.Apparatus and method for error detection and correction in radio frequency identification device
US5500650Dec 15, 1992Mar 19, 1996Micron Technology, Inc.Data communication method using identification protocol
US5530702May 31, 1994Jun 25, 1996Ludwig KippSystem for storage and communication of information
US5550547 *Sep 12, 1994Aug 27, 1996International Business Machines CorporationFor communicating with a base station
US5583850Jun 21, 1994Dec 10, 1996Micron Technology, Inc.Data communication system using identification protocol
US5608739Sep 8, 1995Mar 4, 1997Micron Technology, Inc.Apparatus and method for error detection and correction in radio frequency identification device
US5619648Nov 30, 1994Apr 8, 1997Lucent Technologies Inc.For locating expertise in a messaging system in a computer system
US5621412Jun 7, 1995Apr 15, 1997Texas Instruments IncorporatedRemote identification system
US5625628Mar 15, 1995Apr 29, 1997Hughes ElectronicsIn an integrated satellite network
US5627544Mar 18, 1996May 6, 1997Micron Technology, Inc.Data communication method using identification protocol
US5640151 *Nov 8, 1993Jun 17, 1997Texas Instruments IncorporatedCommunication system for communicating with tags
US5649296 *Jun 19, 1995Jul 15, 1997Lucent Technologies Inc.Tag for use in a radio communication system
US5686902Apr 23, 1996Nov 11, 1997Texas Instruments IncorporatedCommunication system for communicating with tags
US5790946Apr 19, 1995Aug 4, 1998Rotzoll; Robert R.Wake up device for a communications system
US5805586May 2, 1995Sep 8, 1998Motorola Inc.Method, device and data communication system for multilink polling
US5841770Oct 7, 1996Nov 24, 1998Micron Technology, Inc.Data communication system using indentification protocol
US5914671Feb 27, 1997Jun 22, 1999Micron Communications, Inc.System and method for locating individuals and equipment, airline reservation system, communication system
US5936560Jul 18, 1997Aug 10, 1999Fujitsu LimitedData compression method and apparatus performing high-speed comparison between data stored in a dictionary window and data to be compressed
US5940006 *Dec 12, 1995Aug 17, 1999Lucent Technologies Inc.Enhanced uplink modulated backscatter system
US5942987Aug 9, 1996Aug 24, 1999Intermec Ip Corp.Radio frequency identification system with write broadcast capability
US5952922Dec 31, 1996Sep 14, 1999Lucent Technologies Inc.In-building modulated backscatter system
US5966471Dec 23, 1997Oct 12, 1999United States Of AmericaMethod of codebook generation for an amplitude-adaptive vector quantization system
US5974078Feb 13, 1997Oct 26, 1999Micron Technology, Inc.Modulated spread spectrum in RF identification systems method
US5988510Feb 13, 1997Nov 23, 1999Micron Communications, Inc.Tamper resistant smart card and method of protecting data in a smart card
US6038455Aug 29, 1996Mar 14, 2000Cirrus Logic, Inc.Reverse channel reuse scheme in a time shared cellular communication system
US6061344Feb 19, 1998May 9, 2000Micron Technology, Inc.Method of addressing messages and communications system
US6072801Feb 19, 1998Jun 6, 2000Micron Technology, Inc.Method of addressing messages, method of establishing wireless communications, and communications system
US6075973May 18, 1998Jun 13, 2000Micron Technology, Inc.Method of communications in a backscatter system, interrogator, and backscatter communications system
US6097292Sep 19, 1997Aug 1, 2000Cubic CorporationContactless proximity automated data collection system and method
US6104333Dec 19, 1996Aug 15, 2000Micron Technology, Inc.Methods of processing wireless communication, methods of processing radio frequency communication, and related systems
US6118789Feb 19, 1998Sep 12, 2000Micron Technology, Inc.Method of addressing messages and communications system
US6130602Aug 29, 1996Oct 10, 2000Micron Technology, Inc.Radio frequency data communications device
US6150921Oct 17, 1997Nov 21, 2000Pinpoint CorporationArticle tracking system
US6157633Jun 10, 1996Dec 5, 2000At&T Wireless Sucs. Inc.Registration of mobile packet data terminals after disaster
US6169474Apr 23, 1998Jan 2, 2001Micron Technology, Inc.Method of communications in a backscatter system, interrogator, and backscatter communications system
US6177858Nov 27, 1996Jan 23, 2001Pierre RaimbaultMethod for remotely interrogating tags, and station and tag implementing said method
US6192222Sep 3, 1998Feb 20, 2001Micron Technology, Inc.Backscatter communication systems, interrogators, methods of communicating in a backscatter system, and backscatter communication methods
US6216132Nov 20, 1997Apr 10, 2001International Business Machines CorporationMethod and system for matching consumers to events
US6226300Apr 18, 2000May 1, 2001Micron Technology, Inc.Method of addressing messages, and establishing communications using a tree search technique that skips levels
US6229987Apr 26, 2000May 8, 2001Micron Technology, Inc.Method of communications in a backscatter system, interrogator, and backscatter communications system
US6243012Dec 31, 1996Jun 5, 2001Lucent Technologies Inc.Inexpensive modulated backscatter reflector
US6265962Jun 29, 2000Jul 24, 2001Micron Technology, Inc.Method for resolving signal collisions between multiple RFID transponders in a field
US6265963Jun 23, 2000Jul 24, 2001Micron Technology, Inc.Methods of processing wireless communication, methods of processing radio frequency communication, and related systems
US6275476Feb 19, 1998Aug 14, 2001Micron Technology, Inc.Method of addressing messages and communications system
US6282186Apr 24, 2000Aug 28, 2001Micron Technology, Inc.Method of addressing messages and communications system
US6288629May 23, 1997Sep 11, 2001Intermec Ip Corp.Method of using write—ok flag for radio frequency (RF) transponders (RF Tags)
US6289209Aug 8, 1997Sep 11, 2001Micron Technology, Inc.Wireless communication system, radio frequency communications system, wireless communications method, radio frequency communications method
US6307847Jul 17, 2000Oct 23, 2001Micron Technology, Inc.Method of addressing messages and communications systems
US6307848Jan 31, 2001Oct 23, 2001Micron Technology, Inc.Method of addressing messages, method of establishing wireless communications, and communications system
US6324211Apr 24, 1998Nov 27, 2001Micron Technology, Inc.Interrogators communication systems communication methods and methods of processing a communication signal
US6415439Feb 4, 1997Jul 2, 2002Microsoft CorporationProtocol for a wireless control system
US6459726Apr 24, 1998Oct 1, 2002Micron Technology, Inc.Backscatter interrogators, communication systems and backscatter communication methods
US6483427Mar 9, 2000Nov 19, 2002Rf Technologies, Inc.Article tracking system
US6566997Dec 3, 1999May 20, 2003Hid CorporationInterference control method for RFID systems
US6570487 *Apr 22, 1999May 27, 2003Axcess Inc.Distributed tag reader system and method
US6707376Aug 9, 2002Mar 16, 2004Sensormatic Electronics CorporationPulsed power method for increased read range for a radio frequency identification reader
US6714559Sep 21, 2001Mar 30, 2004Broadcom CorporationRedundant radio frequency network having a roaming terminal communication protocol
US6771634Apr 9, 1999Aug 3, 2004At&T Wireless Services, Inc.Registration of mobile packet data terminals after disaster
US6778096Nov 17, 1997Aug 17, 2004International Business Machines CorporationMethod and apparatus for deploying and tracking computers
US6784787May 15, 2000Aug 31, 2004Btg International LimitedIdentification system
US6850510May 8, 2002Feb 1, 2005Broadcom CorporationHierarchical data collection network supporting packetized voice communications among wireless terminals and telephones
US6919793Aug 24, 1999Jul 19, 2005Intermec Ip Corp.Radio frequency identification system write broadcast capability
US7026935Apr 13, 2004Apr 11, 2006Impinj, Inc.Method and apparatus to configure an RFID system to be adaptable to a plurality of environmental conditions
US7315522Mar 28, 2001Jan 1, 2008Micron Technology, Inc.Communication methods using slotted replies
US7385477 *Nov 29, 2005Jun 10, 2008Keystone Technology Solutions, LlcRadio frequency data communications device
US20030235184Jun 20, 2002Dec 25, 2003Dorenbosch Jheroen P.Method and apparatus for speaker arbitration in a multi-participant communication session
US20050060069 *Apr 12, 2004Mar 17, 2005Breed David S.Method and system for controlling a vehicle
US20050207364Jun 1, 2005Sep 22, 2005Wood Clifton W JrMethod of addressing messages and communications system
US20060022800Jul 29, 2005Feb 2, 2006Reva Systems CorporationScheduling in an RFID system having a coordinated RFID tag reader array
US20060022801Jul 29, 2005Feb 2, 2006Reva Systems CorporationRFID tag data acquisition system
US20060022815Jul 29, 2005Feb 2, 2006Fischer Jeffrey HInterference monitoring in an RFID system
US20060056325Nov 8, 2005Mar 16, 2006Wood Clifton W JrMethod of addressing messages and communications system
US20060209781May 2, 2006Sep 21, 2006Micron Technology, Inc.Method of addressing messages and communications system
US20070139164Nov 28, 2006Jun 21, 2007O'toole James ERadio frequency data communications device
US20070176751 *Jan 2, 2007Aug 2, 2007Cesar Christian LMultiple Item Radio Frequency Tag Identification Protocol
US20080007412Sep 14, 2007Jan 10, 2008Wood Clifton W JrMethod of Addressing Messages and Communications System
US20080042806Sep 14, 2007Feb 21, 2008Wood Clifton W JrMethod of Addressing Messages and Communications System
Non-Patent Citations
Reference
1Auto-ID Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, "13.56 MHz ISM Band Class 1 Radio Frequency Identification Tag Interface Specification: Recommended Standard," Technical Report, Feb. 1, 2003.
2Capetanakis, John I., "Generalized TDMA: The Multi-Accessing Tree Protocol," IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. Com. 27, No. 10, pp. 1476-1484, Oct. 1979.
3Capetanakis, John I., "Tree Algorithms for Packet Broadcast Channels", IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. IT-25, No. 5, pp. 505-515, Sep. 1979.
4CNN Money, "Manhattan Associates Announces Next-Generation Microsoft-Based RFID Solutions," located at http://money.cnn.com/services/tickerheadlines/prn/cltu045.PI.09162003122727.24911.htm. Sep. 16, 2003.
5Engels, Daniel, "The Use of the Electronic Product Code," Auto-ID Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Technical Report, Feb. 1, 2003.
6EPC Global, Inc. "EPC Radio Frequency Identity Protocols-Class-1 Generation-2 UHF RFID-Protocol for Communications at 860 MHz-960MHz," version 1.0.9, cover sheet and pp. 37-38, Jan. 2005.
7EPC Global, Inc. "EPC Radio Frequency Identity Protocols—Class-1 Generation-2 UHF RFID—Protocol for Communications at 860 MHz-960MHz," version 1.0.9, cover sheet and pp. 37-38, Jan. 2005.
8eRetailNews, "The Electronic Product Code (EPC)," located at http://www.eretailnews.com/features/epc/htm, accessed Oct. 15, 2003.
9eRetailNews, "The Electronic Product Code (EPC)-A Technology Revolution?" located at: http://www.eretailnews.com/features/0105epx1.htm, accessed Oct. 15, 2003.
10eRetailNews, "The Electronic Product Code Schematic," located at http://eee.eretailnews.com/features/0105epcschema.htm, accessed Oct. 15, 2003.
11eRetailNews, "The Electronic Product Code (EPC)—A Technology Revolution?" located at: http://www.eretailnews.com/features/0105epx1.htm, accessed Oct. 15, 2003.
12Extended Search Report and Search Opinion for EP Patent Application No. 05016513.3, Jan. 22, 2007.
13Extended Search Report and Search Opinion for EP Patent Application No. 05016514.1, Jan. 26, 2007.
14Finkenzeller, Klaus, "Radio Frequency Identification-The Authors Homepage of the RFID Handbook," located at http://www.rfid-handbook.com, accessed Feb. 22, 2007.
15Finkenzeller, Klaus, "Radio Frequency Identification—The Authors Homepage of the RFID Handbook," located at http://www.rfid-handbook.com, accessed Feb. 22, 2007.
16High Tech Aid, "ISO/IEC 18000-RFID Air Interface Standards," located at http://www.hightechaid.com/standards/18000.htm, Feb. 1, 2003.
17High Tech Aid, "ISO/IEC 18000—RFID Air Interface Standards," located at http://www.hightechaid.com/standards/18000.htm, Feb. 1, 2003.
18Humblet, Pierre A. et al., "Efficient Accessing of a Multiaccess Channel," Proceedings of the 19th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control including the Symposium on Adaptive Processes, pp. 624-627, 1980.
19International Application No. PCT/US08/50630, International Search Report, Jun. 27, 2008.
20International Application No. PCT/US08/50630, Written Opinion, Jun. 27, 2008.
21International Application No. PCT/US99/02288, International Search Report, Aug. 3, 1999.
22International Application No. PCT/US99/02288, Written Opinion, Jan. 27, 2000.
23ISO/IEC, "Automatic Identification-Radio Frequency Identification for Item Management-Communications and Interfaces-Part 3: Physical Layer, Anti Collision System andn Protocol Values at 13.56 MHz Mode 4," ISO/IEC 18000-3-4. Mar. 1, 2001.
24ISO/IEC, "Automatic Identification-Radio Frequency Identification for Item Management-Communications and Interfaces-Part 3: Physical Layer, Anti-Collision System and Protocol Values at 13.56 MHz Mode 1," ISO/IEC 18000-3-1, Mar. 1, 2001.
25ISO/IEC, "Identification Cards-Contactless Integrated Circuit(s) Cards-Proximity Cards-Part 1: Physical Characteristics," ISO/IEC FCD 14443-1, 1997.
26ISO/IEC, "Identification Cards-Contactless Integrated Circuit(s) Cards-Proximity Cards-Part 2: Radio Frequency Power and Signal Interface," ISO/IEC FCD 14443-2, Mar. 26, 1999.
27ISO/IEC, "Identification Cards-Contactless Integrated Circuit(s) Cards-Proximity Cards-Part 3: Initiation and Anticollision," ISO/IEC FDIS 14443-3:2000(E), Jul. 13, 2000.
28ISO/IEC, "Identification Cards-Contactless Integrated Circuit(s) Cards-Proximity Cards-Part 4: Transmission Protocol," ISO/IEC FDIS 14443-4:2000(E), Jul. 13, 2000.
29ISO/IEC, "Identification Cards-Contactless Integrated Circuit(s) Cards-Vicinity Cards-Part 1: Physical Characteristics," ISO/IEC FDIS 15693-1:2000(E), May 19, 2000.
30ISO/IEC, "Identification Cards-Contactless Integrated Circuit(s) Cards-Vicinity Cards-Part 2: Interface and Initialization," ISO/IEC FDIS 15693-2:2000(E), Feb. 3, 2000.
31ISO/IEC, "Identification Cards-Contactless Integrated Circuit(s) Cards-Vicinity Cards-Part 3: Anitcollision and Transmission Protocol," ISO/IEC CD 15693-3:1999(E), Nov. 17, 1999.
32ISO/IEC, "Information Technology AIDC Techniques-RFID for Item Management-Air Interface-Part 3: Paramenters for Air Interface Communications at 13.56 MHz," ISO/IEC 18000-3 FCD, May 27, 2002.
33ISO/IEC, "Automatic Identification—Radio Frequency Identification for Item Management—Communications and Interfaces—Part 3: Physical Layer, Anti Collision System andn Protocol Values at 13.56 MHz Mode 4," ISO/IEC 18000-3-4. Mar. 1, 2001.
34ISO/IEC, "Automatic Identification—Radio Frequency Identification for Item Management—Communications and Interfaces—Part 3: Physical Layer, Anti-Collision System and Protocol Values at 13.56 MHz Mode 1," ISO/IEC 18000-3-1, Mar. 1, 2001.
35ISO/IEC, "Identification Cards—Contactless Integrated Circuit(s) Cards—Proximity Cards—Part 1: Physical Characteristics," ISO/IEC FCD 14443-1, 1997.
36ISO/IEC, "Identification Cards—Contactless Integrated Circuit(s) Cards—Proximity Cards—Part 2: Radio Frequency Power and Signal Interface," ISO/IEC FCD 14443-2, Mar. 26, 1999.
37ISO/IEC, "Identification Cards—Contactless Integrated Circuit(s) Cards—Proximity Cards—Part 3: Initiation and Anticollision," ISO/IEC FDIS 14443-3:2000(E), Jul. 13, 2000.
38ISO/IEC, "Identification Cards—Contactless Integrated Circuit(s) Cards—Proximity Cards—Part 4: Transmission Protocol," ISO/IEC FDIS 14443-4:2000(E), Jul. 13, 2000.
39ISO/IEC, "Identification Cards—Contactless Integrated Circuit(s) Cards—Vicinity Cards—Part 1: Physical Characteristics," ISO/IEC FDIS 15693-1:2000(E), May 19, 2000.
40ISO/IEC, "Identification Cards—Contactless Integrated Circuit(s) Cards—Vicinity Cards—Part 2: Interface and Initialization," ISO/IEC FDIS 15693-2:2000(E), Feb. 3, 2000.
41ISO/IEC, "Identification Cards—Contactless Integrated Circuit(s) Cards—Vicinity Cards—Part 3: Anitcollision and Transmission Protocol," ISO/IEC CD 15693-3:1999(E), Nov. 17, 1999.
42ISO/IEC, "Information Technology AIDC Techniques—RFID for Item Management—Air Interface—Part 3: Paramenters for Air Interface Communications at 13.56 MHz," ISO/IEC 18000-3 FCD, May 27, 2002.
43Mullin, Eileen, "Electronic Product Code," Baseline Magazine, located at www.baselinemag.com/article2/0,3959,655991,00.asp, Sep. 5, 2002.
44RFID Journal, "Second Source of Class 1 EPC Chips," located at http://www.rfidjournal.com/article/articleview/473/1/1, Jun. 26, 2003.
45Smart Active Labels Consortium, organization homepage located at http://www.sal-c.org, accessed Feb. 22, 2007.
46Symbol Technologies, Inc., "Understanding Gen 2: What It Is, How You Will Benefit and Criteria for Vendor Assessment," white paper, Jan. 2006.
47Transaction History of related Transaction History of related U.S. Appl. No. 10/652,573, filed Aug. 28, 2003, entitled "Method of Addressing Messages and Communications System."
48Transaction History of related U.S. Appl. No. 09/026,043, filed Feb. 19, 1998, entitled "Method of Addressing Messages and Communications System," now U.S. Patent No. 6,118,789.
49Transaction History of related U.S. Appl. No. 09/026,045, filed Feb. 19, 1998, entitled "Method of Addressing Messages, Methods of Establishing Wireless Communications, and Communications System," now U.S. Patent No. 6,072,801.
50Transaction History of related U.S. Appl. No. 09/026,050, filed Feb. 19, 1998, entitled "Method of Addressing Messages and Communications System," now U.S. Patent No. 6,061,344.
51Transaction History of related U.S. Appl. No. 09/026,248, filed Feb. 19, 1998, entitled "Method of Addressing Messages and Communications System," now U.S. Patent No. 6,275,476.
52Transaction History of related U.S. Appl. No. 09/551,304, filed Apr. 18, 2000, entitled "Method of Addressing Messages and Communications Systems," now U.S. Patent No. 6,282,186.
53Transaction History of related U.S. Appl. No. 09/556,235, filed Apr. 18, 2000, entitled "Method of Addressing Messages, and Establishing Communications Using a Tree Search Technique That Skips Levels," now U.S. Patent No. 6,226,300.
54Transaction History of related U.S. Appl. No. 09/617,390, filed Jul. 17, 2000, entitled "Method of Addressing Messages and Communications System," now U.S. Patent No. 6,307,847.
55Transaction History of related U.S. Appl. No. 09/773,461, filed Jan. 31, 2001, entitled "Method of Addressing Messages, Methods of Establishing Wireless Communications, and Communications System," now U.S. Patent No. 6,307,848.
56Transaction History of related U.S. Appl. No. 09/820,467, filed Mar. 28, 2001, entitled "Method of Addressing Messages and Communications System," now U.S. Patent No. 7,315,522.
57Transaction History of related U.S. Appl. No. 10/693,696, filed Oct. 23, 2003, entitled "Method and Apparatus to Select Radio Frequency Identification Devices in Accordance with an Arbitration Scheme."
58Transaction History of related U.S. Appl. No. 10/693,697, filed Oct. 23, 2003, entitled "Method of Addressing Messages, Methods of Establishing Wireless Communications, and Communications System."
59Transaction History of related U.S. Appl. No. 11/143,395, filed Jun. 1, 2005, entitled "Method of Addressing Messages and Communications System."
60Transaction History of related U.S. Appl. No. 11/270,204, filed Nov. 8, 2005, entitled "Method of Addressing Messages and Communications System."
61Transaction History of related U.S. Appl. No. 11/416,846, filed May 2, 2006, entitled "Method of Addressing Messages and Communications System."
62Transaction History of related U.S. Appl. No. 11/700,525, filed Jan. 30, 2007, entitled "Systems and Methods for RFID Tag Arbitration."
63Transaction History of related U.S. Appl. No. 11/755,073, filed May 30, 2007, entitled "Methods and Systems of Receiving Data Payload of RFID Tags."
64Transaction History of related U.S. Appl. No. 11/855,855, filed Sep. 14, 2007, entitled "Method of Addressing Messages and Communications System."
65Transaction History of related U.S. Appl. No. 11/855,860, filed Sep. 14, 2007, entitled "Method of Addressing Messages and Communications System."
66Transaction History of related U.S. Appl. No. 11/859,360, filed Sep. 21, 2007, entitled "Method of Addressing Messages and Communications System."
67Transaction History of related U.S. Appl. No. 11/859,364, filed Sep. 21, 2007, entitled "Method of Addressing Messages and Communications System."
68Transaction History of related U.S. Appl. No. 11/862,121, filed Sep. 26, 2007, entitled "Method of Addressing Messages and Communications System."
69Transaction History of related U.S. Appl. No. 11/862,130, filed Sep. 26, 2007, entitled "Method of Addressing Messages and Communications System."
70Transaction History of related U.S. Appl. No. 11/865,580, filed Oct. 1, 2007, entitled "Method of Addressing Messages, Methods of Establishing Wireless Communications, and Communications System."
71Transaction History of related U.S. Appl. No. 11/865,584, filed Oct. 1, 2007, entitled "Method of Addressing Messages, Methods of Establishing Wireless Communications, and Communications System."
72Tuttle, John R., U.S. Appl. No. 11/755,073, entitled "Methods and Systems of Receiving Data Payload of RFID Tags," filed May 30, 2007.
73USPTO Transaction History of related U.S. Appl. No. 12/493,542, filed Jun. 29, 2009, entitled "Method of Addressing Messages, Method and Communications System."
74USPTO Transaction History of related U.S. Appl. No. 12/541,882, filed Aug. 14, 2009, entitled "Method of Addressing Messages and Communications System."
75USPTO Transaction History of related U.S. Appl. No. 12/556,530, filed Sep. 9, 2009, entitled "Method of Addressing Messages and Communications System."
76USPTO Transaction History of related U.S. Appl. No. 12/604,329, filed Oct. 22, 2009, entitled "Method of Addressing Messages, Method of Establishing Wireless Communications and Communications System."
77USPTO Transaction History of U.S. Appl. No. 09/026,043, filed Feb. 19, 1998, entitled "Method of Addressing Messages and Communications System," now U.S. Patent No. 6,118,789.
78USPTO Transaction History of U.S. Appl. No. 09/026,045, filed Feb. 19, 1998, entitled "Method of Addressing Messages, Methods of Establishing Wireless Communications, and Communications System," now U.S. Patent No. 6,072,801.
79USPTO Transaction History of U.S. Appl. No. 09/026,050, filed Feb. 19, 1998, entitled "Method of Addressing Messages and Communications System," now U.S. Patent No. 6,061,344.
80USPTO Transaction History of U.S. Appl. No. 09/026,248, filed Feb. 19, 1998, entitled "Method of Addressing Messages and Communications System," now U.S. Patent No. 6,275,476.
81USPTO Transaction History of U.S. Appl. No. 09/551,304, filed Apr. 18, 2000, entitled "Method of Addressing Messages and Communications Systems," now U.S. Patent No. 6,282,186.
82USPTO Transaction History of U.S. Appl. No. 09/556,235, filed Apr. 18, 2000, entitled "Method of Addressing Messages, and Establishing Communications Using a Tree Search Technique That Skips Levels," now U.S. Patent No. 6,226,300.
83USPTO Transaction History of U.S. Appl. No. 09/617,390, filed Jul. 17, 2000, entitled "Method of Addressing Messages and Communications System," now U.S. Patent No. 6,307,847.
84USPTO Transaction History of U.S. Appl. No. 09/773,461, filed Jan. 31, 2001, entitled "Method of Addressing Messages, Methods of Establishing Wireless Communications, and Communications System," now U.S. Patent No. 6,307,848.
85USPTO Transaction History of U.S. Appl. No. 09/820,467, filed Mar. 28, 2001, entitled "Method of Addressing Messages and Communications System," now U.S. Patent No. 7,315,522.
86USPTO Transaction History of U.S. Appl. No. 10/652,573, filed Aug. 28, 2003, entitled "Method of Addressing Messages and Communicatons System."
87USPTO Transaction History of U.S. Appl. No. 10/693,696, filed Oct. 23, 2003, entitled "Method and Apparatus to Select Radio Frequency Identification Devices in Accordance with an Arbitration Scheme."
88USPTO Transaction History of U.S. Appl. No. 10/693,697, filed Oct. 23, 2003, entitled "Method of Addressing Messages, Methods of Establishing Wireless Communications, and Communications System."
89USPTO Transaction History of U.S. Appl. No. 11/143,395, filed Jun. 1, 2005, entitled "Method of Addressing Messages and Communications System".
90USPTO Transaction History of U.S. Appl. No. 11/270,204, filed Nov. 8, 2005, entitled "Method of Addressing Messages and Communications System."
91USPTO Transaction History of U.S. Appl. No. 11/416,846, filed May 2, 2006, entitled "Method of Addressing Messages and Communications System."
92USPTO Transaction History of U.S. Appl. No. 11/855,855, filed Sep. 14, 2007, entitled "Method of Addressing Messages and Communications System."
93USPTO Transaction History of U.S. Appl. No. 11/855,860, filed Sep. 14, 2007, entitled "Method of Addressing Messages and Communications System."
94USPTO Transaction History of U.S. Appl. No. 11/859,360, filed Sep. 21, 2007, entitled "Method of Addressing Messages and Communications System."
95USPTO Transaction History of U.S. Appl. No. 11/859,364, filed Sep. 21, 2007, entitled "Method of Addressing Messages and Communications System."
96USPTO Transaction History of U.S. Appl. No. 11/862,121, filed Sep. 26, 2007, entitled "Method of Addressing Messages and Communications System."
97USPTO Transaction History of U.S. Appl. No. 11/862,130, filed Sep. 26, 2007, entitled "Method of Addressing Messages and Communications System."
98USPTO Transaction History of U.S. Appl. No. 11/865,580, filed Oct. 1, 2007, entitled "Method of Addressing Messages, Methods of Establishing Wireless Communications,and Communications System."
99USPTO Transaction History of U.S. Appl. No. 11/865,584, filed Oct. 1, 2007, entitled "Method of Addressing Messages, Methods of Establishing Wireless Communications,and Communications System."
100Wolf, Jack Keil, "Principles of Group Testing and an Application to the Design and Analysis of Multi-Access Protocols," NATO ASI Series E, Applied Sciences, No. 91, pp. 237-257, 1985.
101Wood, Jr., Clifton W., U.S. Appl. No. 10/652,573, filed Aug. 28, 2008.
102Wood, Jr., Clifton W., U.S. Appl. No. 10/693,696, filed Oct. 23, 2003.
103Wood, Jr., Clifton W., U.S. Appl. No. 10/693,697, filed Oct. 23, 2003.
104Wood, Jr., Clifton W., U.S. Appl. No. 11/859,360, filed Sep. 21, 2007.
105Wood, Jr., Clifton W., U.S. Appl. No. 11/859,364, filed Sep. 21, 2007.
106Wood, Jr., Clifton W., U.S. Appl. No. 11/862,121, filed Sep. 26, 2007.
107Wood, Jr., Clifton W., U.S. Appl. No. 11/862,130, filed Sep. 21, 2007.
108Wood, Jr., Clifton W., U.S. Appl. No. 11/865,580, filed Oct. 1, 2007.
109Wood, Jr., Clifton W., U.S. Appl. No. 11/865,584, filed Oct. 1, 2007.
110Wood, Jr., Clifton W., U.S. Appl. No. 12/493,542, filed Jun. 29, 2009.
111Wood, Jr., Clifton W., U.S. Appl. No. 12/541,882, filed Aug. 14, 2009.
112Wright, Jim, "Trends and Innovations in RF Indentification," SUN Microsystems Inc. presentation, Mar. 2005.
113Zebra Technologies Corporation, "Electronic Product Code (EPC)," located at http://www.rfid.zebra.com/epc/htm, accessed Oct. 15, 2003.
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US8072331Apr 7, 2011Dec 6, 2011Tyfone, Inc.Mobile payment device
US8083145May 24, 2011Dec 27, 2011Tyfone, Inc.Provisioning an add-on apparatus with smartcard circuity for enabling transactions
US8091786May 24, 2011Jan 10, 2012Tyfone, Inc.Add-on card with smartcard circuitry powered by a mobile device
US8136732Jul 15, 2011Mar 20, 2012Tyfone, Inc.Electronic transaction card with contactless interface
US8231061Feb 23, 2010Jul 31, 2012Tyfone, IncContactless device with miniaturized antenna
US8408463Feb 9, 2012Apr 2, 2013Tyfone, Inc.Mobile device add-on apparatus for financial transactions
US8410936Dec 5, 2011Apr 2, 2013Tyfone, Inc.Contactless card that receives power from host device
US8451122Mar 1, 2011May 28, 2013Tyfone, Inc.Smartcard performance enhancement circuits and systems
US8474718Mar 21, 2012Jul 2, 2013Tyfone, Inc.Method for provisioning an apparatus connected contactless to a mobile device
US8573494Nov 27, 2011Nov 5, 2013Tyfone, Inc.Apparatus for secure financial transactions
US8814053Oct 22, 2012Aug 26, 2014Tyfone, Inc.Mobile payment device with small inductive device powered by a host device
US20100033310 *Aug 8, 2008Feb 11, 2010Narendra Siva GPower negotation for small rfid card
Classifications
U.S. Classification370/346
International ClassificationH04L12/44, H04L1/00
Cooperative ClassificationH04L41/0893, H04L41/12, H04W4/00
European ClassificationH04W4/00, H04L41/12, H04L41/08F
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
Jan 30, 2013FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 12
Jan 26, 2010ASAssignment
Effective date: 20091222
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:KEYSTONE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, LLC;REEL/FRAME:023839/0881
Owner name: MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC., IDAHO
Owner name: MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.,IDAHO
Jan 4, 2010ASAssignment
Owner name: ROUND ROCK RESEARCH, LLC, NEW YORK
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.;REEL/FRAME:023786/0416
Effective date: 20091223
Owner name: ROUND ROCK RESEARCH, LLC,NEW YORK