|Publication number||USRE41567 E1|
|Application number||US 11/786,468|
|Publication date||Aug 24, 2010|
|Priority date||Aug 10, 2000|
|Also published as||US6879412|
|Publication number||11786468, 786468, US RE41567 E1, US RE41567E1, US-E1-RE41567, USRE41567 E1, USRE41567E1|
|Inventors||Jenn-Tsair Tsai, June-Num Chen|
|Original Assignee||Jenn-Tsair Tsai, June-Num Chen|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (17), Classifications (33), Legal Events (3)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention generally relates to a method and an apparatus for fast finding and optimizing the best resolution of an optical scanning device.
2. Background Description
Generally, an optical scanning system employs many components such as an image capturing device, lenses and so on, to assemble a scanning module with high precision. The scanning module can generate and record an image of an object after proper alignment and calibration. The scanning module further would be able to transform the captured image to digital signals with carrying out the visual image. In this case, the scanning process is completed. Therefore, a precise alignment and good assembly quality are a very important cause to the scanning module.
Further, please refer to FIG. 3.
Accordingly, the assembly of the traditional optical scanning device includes the steps of the followings. Firstly, the assembling technician mounts the document glass 101 and the image capturing device 103. The lens 102 is able to move along a specified direction linearly, as shown in FIG. 1. The lens is further temporarily fixed in a predetermined position. A calibration device 11 is placed on the document glass 101. The calibration device 11 contains a print 110. Pleas refer to FIG. 2. The optical scanning device further includes a light source (not shown in the figure). The light source provides a light illuminated on the document glass 101 and later reflected by the calibration device 11. The light is transmitted via an optical route 104 to the lens 102, and generated an image on the image capturing device 103. The image capturing device 103 generates digital signals. In this point, the adjusting device 12 calculates the MTF by referencing the digital signals and displays the result. In this case, the value of MTF presents the resolution of the calibration device 11, which is placed in the document glass 101. The assembling technician is therefore able to adjust the position of the lens in order to get the maximum value of MTF, and fixes the lens at the position where the value of MTF is maximum or above the MTF tolerant value. If the value of MTF is maximum, the best resolution of the optical scanning device is achieved.
The calibration device 110, described in the above for adjusting the scanning system, only has one print, and the print contains plural parallel lines. The vector on X-axis and the vector on Y-axis of the lines give the adjusting device 12 basis to calculate the value of MTF for representing the resolution of the X-axis and Y-axis. Moreover, some calibration devices only provide plural parallel lines in one direction, such as X-axis or Y-axis. In this case, the assembling technician only get the reference resolution in one direction. Practically, due to the misalignment of the assembly, the axis of the lens 102 is usually unable to be perpendicular to the document glass. Thus, the axis of the lens has an inclined angular with the X-axis or Y-axis, as shown in FIG. 4A. Upmost, there are possibly containing two inclinations along X-axis and Y-axis. In this case, the X-axis resolution and the Y-axis resolution of the same point are different. Therefore, the best position of the lens cannot be obtained in this respect. Since a standard resolution can be obtained via traditional skills, the quality of assembled scanning devices would be reduced if the position of the lens only relies on one direction, such as X-axis or Y-axis.
In view of the above, it is important to provide a method and an apparatus for optimizing the best resolution of an optical scanning device in this industry.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a method and an apparatus for fast finding the best resolution of an optical scanning device in order to speed up and simplify the assembling processes.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a simplified assembling process in order to increase the product quality and to reduce the cost of the optical scanning device.
The foregoing and other objects, aspects and advantages will be better understood from the following detailed description of a preferred embodiment of the invention with reference to the drawings, in which:
The present invention is directed to an improvement of the print of the calibration device. By the calculation of the adjusting device, there is generated a referencing parameter for fast finding and optimizing the best position of the lens. In this case, a high precise assembling process is obtained and thus reduces the misalignment caused by different technicians with different skills.
Please refer to
When the calibration device receive the parameters XR, YR, XL and YL, a total value of MTF, denoted as A, is generated as A=XR+XR+XL+YL. The legend A represents the total resolution of the scanning module. Larger value of A means better resolution.
Further, regarding the precision during assembly, the lens may incline along left and right directions or along front and rear directions. In this case, the resolution may be unable to be balanced. In order to overcome the above problems, a horizontal balance value is generated as |XR−XL|. Smaller |XR−XL| means smaller difference of the horizontal resolution. Accordingly, the vertical balance value is |YR−YL|. Smaller |YR−YL |means smaller difference of the vertical resolution. Moreover, a left side of the balance value is considered as |XL−YL|. Smaller |XL−YL|means smaller difference between the left side of the vertical resolution and the left side of the horizontal resolution. A right side of the balance value is considered as |XR−YR|. Smaller |XR−YR| means smaller difference between the right side of the vertical resolution and the right side of the horizontal resolution. Thus a balance value B of the M is considered as B=|XR−XL|+|YR−YL|+|XL−YL|+|XR−YR|. The value of B represent the sum of MTF balance values of the scanning module. Smaller value of B means better balance of the scanning module.
In view of the above, C is considered as a referencing parameter which is calculated as C=A−B. Larger C means better resolution and better balance of the scanning module.
The adjusting device further provides a display for displaying the parameters described in the above. The displaying method could be a digital type. The assembling technicians can reference the value of the parameters by the help of the display, during the assembling process. The displaying method could be a light indicating type. The technicians can reference the light in order to determine whether the parameters achieve the optimizing values. In this cases, the parameters can improve the assembling quality, regarding the resolution.
According to the calibration device and the adjusting device mentioned in the above, the method of the present invention for optimizing the best resolution is described as follows. Please refer to FIG. 7.
Although preferred embodiments of the present invention have been described in the forgoing description and illustrated in the accompanying drawings, it will be understood that the invention is not limited to the embodiments disclosed, but is capable of numerous rearrangements, modifications, and substituting of parts and elements without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the present invention is intended to encompass such rearrangements, modifications, and substitutions of parts and elements as fall within the scope of the appended claims.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4783700 *||Jun 9, 1987||Nov 8, 1988||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Image sensor unit and image reading apparatus having the unit|
|US5335093 *||Mar 31, 1992||Aug 2, 1994||Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd.||Film image reading system|
|US5642202||Dec 1, 1994||Jun 24, 1997||Xerox Corporation||Scan image target locator system for calibrating a printing system|
|US6016207 *||Jul 24, 1997||Jan 18, 2000||Hewlett-Packard Company||Facsimile scan position calibration apparatus and method|
|US6078703 *||May 6, 1999||Jun 20, 2000||Ricoh Company, Ltd.||Image processing apparatus, method and computer program product|
|US6178015 *||Jun 5, 1998||Jan 23, 2001||Mustek Systems, Inc.||Apparatus and method for increasing the scan accuracy and quality of the flatbed scanner by using close loop control|
|US6178018 *||Jun 25, 1999||Jan 23, 2001||International Business Machines Corporation||Process and method employing dynamic holographic display medium|
|US6219463 *||Jan 6, 1998||Apr 17, 2001||Minolta Co., Ltd.||Image reading device capable of obtaining an accurate image|
|US6222934 *||Jul 17, 1998||Apr 24, 2001||Mustek Systems Inc.||Test chart for determining the image quality of an optical scanner|
|US6337472 *||Oct 19, 1998||Jan 8, 2002||The University Of Texas System Board Of Regents||Light imaging microscope having spatially resolved images|
|US6377362 *||Dec 17, 1998||Apr 23, 2002||Mustek Systems, Inc.||Method and apparatus for obtaining magnification error for image scanning apparatus|
|US6557762 *||Jun 6, 2000||May 6, 2003||Mustek Systems Inc.||Method for increasing depth of scanning field of a scanning device|
|US6734903 *||Feb 27, 1995||May 11, 2004||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Image sensing apparatus|
|US6809842 *||Nov 21, 2000||Oct 26, 2004||Mustek Systems Inc.||Apparatus for scanning document|
|US6814288 *||Jun 24, 2003||Nov 9, 2004||Symbol Technologies, Inc.||Beam shaping system and diverging laser beam for scanning optical code|
|US6940649 *||Apr 4, 2003||Sep 6, 2005||The Regents Of The University Of Colorado||Wavefront coded imaging systems|
|US20080043126 *||May 30, 2007||Feb 21, 2008||Kyocera Corporation||Image pickup apparatus and method and apparatus for manufacturing the same|
|U.S. Classification||358/1.2, 359/386, 358/483, 358/504, 348/272, 358/452, 235/462.32, 359/385, 358/406, 382/312, 358/482, 382/294, 235/439, 235/454, 348/222.1|
|International Classification||G06K1/00, G06F15/00|
|Cooperative Classification||H04N1/00045, H04N1/00068, H04N1/00013, H04N1/00002, H04N1/00063, H04N1/00076, H04N1/00053, H04N1/00031|
|European Classification||H04N1/00A3T, H04N1/00A3W, H04N1/00A2C, H04N1/00A3C, H04N1/00A3J, H04N1/00A3M, H04N1/00A4B8, H04N1/00A|
|Jun 27, 2007||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: TRANSPACIFIC OPTICS LLC, DELAWARE
Effective date: 20051202
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MUSTEK SYSTEMS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:019486/0104
Owner name: MUSTEK SYSTEMS, INC., DELAWARE
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:TSAI, JENN-TSAIR;CHEN, JUNE-NUM;SIGNING DATES FROM 20000628 TO 20020628;REEL/FRAME:019486/0079
|Nov 26, 2012||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|Apr 12, 2013||LAPS||Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees|