|Publication number||USRE41776 E1|
|Application number||US 11/978,693|
|Publication date||Sep 28, 2010|
|Filing date||Oct 30, 2007|
|Priority date||Aug 31, 1998|
|Also published as||US6594400, USRE40177, USRE40178, USRE40179, USRE40180, USRE41385, USRE41386, USRE41387, USRE41402, USRE41403, USRE41404, USRE41405, USRE41406, USRE41419, USRE41420, USRE41421, USRE41422, USRE41423, USRE41436, USRE41437, USRE41446, USRE41459, USRE41909, USRE41910, USRE41932, USRE41953|
|Publication number||11978693, 978693, US RE41776 E1, US RE41776E1, US-E1-RE41776, USRE41776 E1, USRE41776E1|
|Inventors||Jae Min Kim|
|Original Assignee||Lg Electronics, Inc.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (64), Non-Patent Citations (5), Classifications (22)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
Notice: More than one reissue application has been filed for the reissue of U.S. Pat. No. 6,594,400. The reissue applications are application Ser. Nos. 11/102,888 11/102,889, 11/102,890 and 11/102,891, 11/785,082, 11/785,083, 11/785,084,11/785,085, 11/785,086, 11/785,087, 11/785,088, 11/785,089, 11/785,090, 11/785,091, 11/978,688, 11/978,689, 11/978,690, 11/978,691, 11/978,692, 11/978,693, 11/978,694, 11/978,695, 11/978,696, 11/978,697, 11/978,698, and 11/978,699, all of which are divisional reissues of U.S. Pat. No. 6,594,400.
This is a direct divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/102,890, filed Apr. 11, 2005; the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
The present invention relates to a method of filtering an image decoder and more particularly, to a method of removing a block effect and ring effect which appear in a compression-coded image of an image decoder. The present invention is especially applicable to reduce the block and ring effects appearing in an image coded at a very low bit rate .
To encode either a still or motion image using a process based upon a discrete cosine transform (DCT), the image is divided into a plurality of segments. Typically, the image is divided into 8×8 segment blocks and the DCT operation is executed for each block. However, an inter-block correction information cannot be obtained by such a block-based DCT operation, thereby causing a visual discontinuity effect, known as the block effect, to appear at boundaries between adjacent blocks.
Generally, when the DCT operation is performed on an original image, most of the significant information would be concentrated within the lower-frequency components rather than the higher-frequency components. Thus, the low-frequency components of the block-based DCT process would include a large amount of correlation information regarding adjacent blocks. However, the block-based DCT process lacks the inter-block correlation information. As a result, if the low-frequency components are quantized on a block-by-block basis, a continuity is lost between adjacent blocks, resulting in the block effect in a reconstructed image.
Also, by quantizing the coefficients obtained from the DCT process, the number of bits is reduced. Namely, as the interval of the quantization step ‘q’ increases, the number of components to be coded reduces, resulting in a reduction in the number of bits. At the same time, however, the high-frequency components of the original image is are lost, causing a distortion called the ring effect in the reconstructed image. The ring effect increases with the quantization step interval and is especially apparent in object contours of the reconstructed image.
The cause of the block effect and the ring effect may generally be deemed as a loss of information in the original image. Moreover, with a lower bit rate, the loss of information is more sever severe and, the block effect and/or ring effect becomes more significant.
One simple method to reduce the block effect and/or the ring effect is a low pass filtering (LPF). For example, an averaging operation or a digital signal process which substantially has the effect of a LPF may be used to remove the block effect or ring effect.
One LPF technique is based on the an averaging operation, including a filtering masking by which nine pixels are selected. Basically, a given pixel and eight pixels surrounding the given pixel are selected as the nine (3×3) pixels. Thereafter, the nine pixels are summed and divided by nine to obtain the average pixel value. However, this LPF technique is disadvantageous because it further filters object contours which are important factors for image recognition. Other LPF techniques are variants on the application of the filtering masking in consideration of the form and pixels selected.
Another method to reduce the block effect and/or the ring effect is an adaptive LPF in which an image is partitioned into blocks according to the directions of the image contours. A filter suitable to the contour directions of the partitioned blocks is then employed. The adaptive LPF can be applied to a local image characteristic by partitioning a reconstructed image into blocks according to the object contours of the reconstructed image. However, the directions of the object contours is difficult to find when performing a coding operation at a low bit rate. Thus, the adaptive LPF cannot be applied in a very low bit rate coding.
Other block/ring effect reduction methods include repeating processes at a frequency domain and image domain under a predetermined restriction; utilizing both the previous information of an original image and the transmitted data to remove the block effect (POCS/CLS algorithm based regularization); and a constrained quadratic programming. However, these methods cannot be applied in a real-time process because they are all repetitive. Moreover, these methods process data at both the frequency domain and image domain, thereby complicating the construction of a coder and decoder.
Still other methods of reducing the block/ring effect include a method of moving the position of the 8×8 blocks to be coded by an interval of one of two frames in successive images such that the block effect visually appears less; a method of controlling a filtering level using a frequency analyzer; a projection method and a smoothing operation repeating method; and a method of performing a filtering operation based upon the quantization noise information transmitted from a coder. However, these methods all have problems. Namely, most international standards prescribe that blocks have fixed positions, thus the block position should not be moved. Controlling a filtering level only changes pixel values at boundaries between adjacent blocks, resulting in a degradation in the block effect removal. The projection method require requires a large amount of processing time and the filtering based upon the quantization noise is inefficient because additional information must be obtained from the coder, which increases the amount of bits being generated.
The present invention provides an apparatus for decoding an image.
In an embodiment of the present invention, the apparatus includes a filtering unit configured to filter a pixel of an image. The filtering unit is configured to select at least four pixels of successive pixels according to a position of a pixel to be filtered. The four pixels include the pixel to be filtered. At least one of the four pixels may be in a first block, and three of the four pixels may be in a second block adjacent to the first block. The filtering unit is configured to determine a difference between two of the successive pixels. The filtering unit is configured to apply an averaging operation to the selected at least four pixels.
For example, in one embodiment, the difference is between two of the successive pixels in the second block. Also, one of the two successive pixels upon which the difference is based may be the pixel to be filtered.
In another embodiment, the pixel to be filtered is in the first block. For example, the filtering unit is configured to determine the difference between a pixel in the first block and a nearby one of the pixels in the second block.
In a further embodiment, the averaging operation includes applying a weight to a pixel being averaged.
An object of the present invention is to solve at least the problems and disadvantages of the related art.
An object of the present invention is to reduce the block and ring effects while maintaining the details of an image. Thus, the object of the present invention is to enhance the picture quality of a reconstructed imaged obtained by decoding a coded bit stream.
Another object of the present invention is to remove the block and ring effects in a compression-coded image.
A further object of the present invention is to remove the block and ring effects in a compression-coded imaged coded at a very low bit rate.
A still further object of the present invention is to remove the block/ring effects in a compression-coded image which is transmitted by a block-by-block basis.
Additional advantages, objects, and features of the invention will be set forth in part in the description which follows and in part will become apparent to those having ordinary skill in the art upon examination of the following or may be learned from practice of the invention. The objects and advantages of the invention may be realized and attained as particularly pointed out in the appended claims.
To achieve the objects and in accordance with the purposes of the invention, as embodied and broadly described herein, a method of removing the block and ring effects in a compression-coded image transmitted by a block-by-block basis includes comparing differences between an arbitrary pixel to be filtered and the pixels surrounding the arbitrary pixel with a predetermined threshold value and selecting candidate pixels to be associated with an averaging operation among the surrounding pixels in accordance with the compared results; and selecting the surrounding pixels using any one of five 8-tab masks adaptive to a position of the arbitrary pixel. In four of the five 8-tab masks, the tabs are arranged such that the upper, lower, left and right blocks adjacent to the arbitrary block is longer, respectively. Also, one of the five 8-tab masks is a modified 3×3 filtering mask such that one corner of the 3×3 mask is discarded.
In another embodiment of the present invention, a method of removing the block and ring effects in a compression-coded image transmitted on a block-by-block basis, includes adaptively selecting for a given block a mask to be filtered in consideration of the directions of blocks adjacent to the given block; comparing differences between an arbitrary pixel to be filtered in the selected mask and pixels in the selected mask surrounding the arbitrary pixel with a predetermined threshold value, and selecting pixels to be associated with an averaging operation among the surrounding pixels in accordance with the compared results; and applying a desired weight to the arbitrary pixel in consideration of the number of pixels excluded in the averaging operation, and performing the averaging operation with respect to the arbitrary pixel and the selected pixels for a filtering operation with respect to the arbitrary pixel.
An image decoder according to the present invention which reconstructs an image transmitted on a block-by-block basis and filters the reconstructed image includes a filtering masking unit selecting a filtering mask including an arbitrary pixel to be filtered and pixels surrounding the arbitrary pixel, in consideration of the position of the arbitrary pixel in a given block and in consideration of the directions of blocks adjacent to the given block; candidate pixel selection unit comparing differences between the arbitrary pixel and the surrounding pixels with a predetermined threshold value and selecting candidate pixels to be associated with an averaging operation among the surrounding pixels in accordance with the compared results; and averaging unit averaging with respect to the arbitrary pixel and the candidate pixels selected by the candidate pixel selection unit to perform the filtering operation with respect to the arbitrary pixel.
The candidate pixel selection unit is adapted to exclude each of the surrounding pixels from the averaging operation if a difference between a surrounding pixel and the arbitrary pixel exceeds the predetermined threshold value. The averaging unit is adapted to apply a desired weight to the arbitrary pixel in consideration of the number of pixels excluded by the candidate pixel selection unit to perform the averaging operation with respect to both the arbitrary pixel and the candidate pixels selected by the candidate pixel selection unit.
Preferably, the threshold value is defined as δ=k×q, where δ is the threshold value, k is a constant determined in consideration of the position of the arbitrary pixel in the given block and the directions of the blocks adjacent to the given block, and q is a quantization step interval of the given block.
The invention will be described in detail with reference to the following drawings in which like reference numerals refer to like elements wherein:
FIGS. 2(a) to 2(e) are views illustrating a variety of mask forms according to the present invention; and
The present invention removes the block effect and ring effect appearing in a compression-coded image by an adaptive candidate pixel selection.
In the adaptive candidate pixel selection, a mask to be filtered is selected and pixels to be averaged are selected from the pixels in the selected mask. The pixels are selected by comparing differences between a pixel to be filtered and pixels surrounding the pixel to be filtered with a predetermined threshold value δ.
The threshold value δ is proportionate to a quantization step interval used for the quantization of DCT coefficients in a coder. Namely, the threshold value δ is varied according to the required objectives. For example, a threshold value δ used for the removal of the ring effect is smaller than the threshold value used for the removal of the block effect.
After the pixels to be averaged are selected, the averaging operation is performed with respect to the selected pixels and the pixel to be filtered. At this time, a weight may be applied to the pixel to be filtered. The weight, if applied, corresponds to the number of pixels not selected in the selected mask.
For example, if each mask is set to include eight pixels, the weight is determined such that the values of pixels to be averaged can be divided by 8 for the averaging operation even though the number of pixels is smaller than 8. Particularly, the weight determination is performed in a way that the ‘division by 8’ can be executed by a simple shift command. The use of the shift command makes the averaging operation simple, resulting in a reduction in processing time and thus, a simplification in a decoder construction.
In the coder, the original image is divided into blocks, where each block has, for example, an 8×8 size. The DCT unit 101 performs a DCT operation with respect to the divided blocks to generate DCT coefficients. The quantization unit 102 quantizes the DCT coefficients from the DCT unit 101 and transmits the coefficients in the form of a bit stream to the decoder through a transmission channel.
The quantization operation may be performed in a variety of ways depending upon the coding method. However, the lower-frequency components generally have relatively larger amounts of significant information regarding the original image than higher-frequency components. As a result, the lower-frequency components are quantized by a shorter quantization step interval and the higher-frequency components are quantized by a longer quantization step interval.
In the decoder, the DCT coefficients are dequantized by the dequantization unit 103 and inverse DCT-processed by the inverse DCT unit 104, to form a reconstructed image. Thereafter, the filtering process unit 105 of the present invention performs a filtering operation with respect to the reconstructed image to obtain the resultant image, without block effect effects and ring effect effects.
Namely, the block effect effects and the ring effect effects appear in the reconstructed image of the decoder. The ring effect is generated when quantizing high-frequency components of the DCT coefficients. The ring effect is composed of spatial sinusoidal signals having an average of ‘0’ and generated at a short period. A human's visual system is sensitive to the ring effect near flat areas in which contours of an image are present. The block effect is generated by quantizing low-frequency components of the DCT coefficients. The block effect produces vertical and horizontal partitions in the reconstructed image to which the human eyes are sensitive.
A filtering process of the present invention for reducing the ring effect and the block effect includes determining a mask form, selecting surrounding pixels to be used in the averaging operation, and performing the averaging operation.
As discussed above, a low pass filtering is a simple method to remove the block and ring effect. In the present invention, the mask selection is important. FIGS. 2(a) to 2(e) show a variety of mask forms to be selected in the present invention, wherein the reference character ‘r’ denotes a reference pixel to be filtered.
Particularly, FIG. 2(a) shows a mask form in which eight tabs are selected from a (3×3) mask form, discarding one left upper tab. This mask form is effective for the center of a block. Although the upper left tab is discarded in FIG. 2(a), any one of the corner tabs may be discarded.
FIG. 2(b) shows a mask form in which more tabs are selected in a vertical direction than a horizontal direction, and more vertical lower tabs are selected than vertical upper tabs. FIG. 2(c) shows a mask form in which more tabs are selected in the vertical direction than the horizontal direction, and more vertical upper tabs are selected than vertical lower tabs. FIG. 2(d) shows a mask form in which more tabs are selected in the horizontal direction than the vertical direction, and more horizontal left tabs are selected than horizontal right tabs. FIG. 2(e) shows a mask form in which more tabs are selected in the horizontal direction than the vertical direction, and more horizontal right tabs are selected than horizontal left tabs.
In FIGS. 2(a) to 2(e), eight tabs are utilized in each of the five masks in consideration of high-speed operation and construction simplification, as will be discussed below. Also, in the preferred embodiment, the five mask forms shown in FIGS. 2(a) to 2(e) are assigned to positions corresponding to the letter of the Figure in an 8×8 block, as shown in FIG. 3.
The mask form in FIG. 2(c) is used in the upper boundary of the block because of the long vertical tabs. This allows an averaging of the pixel to be filtered with a maximum of three pixels in the upper adjacent block. The mask form shown in FIG. 2(b) is used in the lower boundary so that the pixel to be filtered is averaged with maximum of three pixels in the lower adjacent block. The mask form shown in FIG. 2(d) is used in the left boundary so that the pixel to be filtered is averaged with maximum of three pixels in the left adjacent block. The mask form shown in FIG. 2(e) is used in the right boundary so that the pixel to be filtered is averaged with maximum of three pixels in the right adjacent block. Finally, the mask form shown in FIG. 2(a) is used at diagonally from the corners to the center of the 8×8 block so what the pixel to the filtered is averaged with the pixels from the adjacent blocks.
As discussed above, utilizing eight tabs in each of the five masks makes the averaging operation and decoder construction simple, while maintaining the filtering effect. Namely, an averaging operation based on a typical 3×3 mask includes eight additions and one division, which requires a large amount of calculation time. However, a modified 3×3 mask according to the present invention maintains a denominator at ‘8’ and a ‘division by 8’ can be executed by a simple shift command which requires a small amount of calculation time. As a result, the division can be substituted with a shift operator.
After selecting an appropriate mask, candidate pixels to be averaged may be selected. Rather than averaging all the pixels for a pixel to be filtered, some pixels are excluded from the averaging operation. The pixels are selected based upon a comparison between the difference of the pixel to be filtered from a pixel corresponding to an object contour and the predetermined threshold value δ. Namely, an absolute value of such difference is compared with the predetermined threshold value δ.
If a given pixel is averaged together with pixels forming the object contours, the details of an image are filtered to vanish. Thus, a process of excluding pixels determine as object contours from the averaging operation for a pixel to be filtered would reduce the block and ring effects while maintaining the image details.
Accordingly, a pixel of the selected mask is included in the averaging operation if the difference, i.e. the absolute value, between the pixel of the selected mask and a pixel to be filtered is smaller than the predetermined threshold value δ. If the difference is not smaller, the pixel of the selected mask is excluded from the averaging operation.
Also, to set the denominator of the averaging operation to 8, an appropriate weight is applied to the pixel to be filtered, in consideration of the number of pixels excluded in the averaging operation. For example, if two surrounding pixels are excluded in the averaging operation for a pixel Pi, a weight compensating the two pixels are added to the original value of Pi. Specifically, a weight of 2×Pi would be added to the Pi, making the value of the pixel to be filtered 3×Pi. Thus, the weight added to the pixel to be filtered is the value of the pixel to be filtered multiplied by the number of pixels excluded.
The threshold value δ is determined in consideration of the block effect and the ring effect. Because the degrees of the block/ring effects ar are proportionate to the quantization step interval, the threshold value δ is defined as follows:
where, k is a constant and q is the quantization step interval of a block.
In the preferred an example embodiment of the present invention, the value k is 1.0 for filtereing filtering pixels at the boundary of the a block and 0.6 for filtering pixels within the boundary pixels of the block. The value of k is greater at the block boundaries to cope more efficiently with the block effect.
Thus, the preferred example embodiment of the present filtering operation includes selecting an appropriate mask, selecting pixels to be averaged with a pixel to be filtered from the selected mask, and averaging the selected pixels and the pixel to be filtered. Any one of the five 8-tab masks shown in FIGS. 2(a) to 2(e) are selected depending upon the position of the pixel to be filtered in a block, and the pixels in the selected mask, excluding pixels determined as object contours, are averaged with the pixel to be filtered. Moreover, by applying a weight to the pixel to be filtered, the denominator of the averaging operation may be kept constant. Accordingly, the present filtering operation reduces the block effect and the ring effect.
As discussed above, according to the present invention, a determination is made whether pixels surrounding the pixel to be filtered is are part of the object contour and an averaging operation is performed based upon the determined result. A modified 3×3 filtering mask is used within a given block to remove the ring effect. Particularly, the masks includes more tabs toward adjacent blocks at boundaries of the given block to remove the block effect and ring effect.
Moreover, pixels to be included in the averaging operation for the filtering operation and pixels to be excluded therefrom are also determined based upon a threshold value, and a weight is applied to a pixel being filtered in the averaging operation in consideration of the number of the excluded pixels such that the denominator remains ‘8’ in the averaging operation. Therefore, the present invention not only reduces the block and ring effects, but reduces the processing time with a simple hardware construction.
The foregoing embodiments are merely exemplary and are not to be construed as limiting the present invention. The present teachings can be readily applied to other types of apparatuses. The description of the present invention is intended to be illustrative, and not to limit the scope of the claims invention. Many alternatives, modifications, and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US5122875||Feb 27, 1991||Jun 16, 1992||General Electric Company||An HDTV compression system|
|US5283646||Apr 9, 1992||Feb 1, 1994||Picturetel Corporation||Quantizer control method and apparatus|
|US5367385 *||May 7, 1992||Nov 22, 1994||Picturetel Corporation||Method and apparatus for processing block coded image data to reduce boundary artifacts between adjacent image blocks|
|US5488570||Jun 29, 1994||Jan 30, 1996||Intel Corporation||Encoding and decoding video signals using adaptive filter switching criteria|
|US5555028 *||Jun 29, 1995||Sep 10, 1996||Daewoo Electronics Co., Ltd.||Post-processing method and apparatus for use in an image signal decoding system|
|US5563813||Jun 1, 1994||Oct 8, 1996||Industrial Technology Research Institute||Area/time-efficient motion estimation micro core|
|US5611000||Jan 16, 1996||Mar 11, 1997||Digital Equipment Corporation||Spline-based image registration|
|US5694492 *||May 1, 1995||Dec 2, 1997||Daewoo Electronics Co., Ltd||Post-processing method and apparatus for removing a blocking effect in a decoded image signal|
|US5748795||Feb 5, 1996||May 5, 1998||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Image decoder using adjustable filtering|
|US5748799 *||Sep 27, 1996||May 5, 1998||Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd.||Image processing method and apparatus|
|US5787210 *||Sep 22, 1995||Jul 28, 1998||Daewood Electronics, Co., Ltd.||Post-processing method for use in an image signal decoding system|
|US5790131||May 15, 1996||Aug 4, 1998||Iterated Systems, Inc.||System and method for lossy compression of data with output file size control|
|US5877813 *||Oct 18, 1996||Mar 2, 1999||Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.||Loop filtering method for reducing blocking effects and ringing noise of a motion-compensated image|
|US5878166||Dec 26, 1995||Mar 2, 1999||C-Cube Microsystems||Field frame macroblock encoding decision|
|US5883983 *||Oct 9, 1996||Mar 16, 1999||Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.||Adaptive postprocessing system for reducing blocking effects and ringing noise in decompressed image signals|
|US5933541||Aug 16, 1996||Aug 3, 1999||Siemens Aktiengesellschaft||Method for processing decoded picture blocks in a block-based method of picture coding|
|US5937101 *||Jan 19, 1996||Aug 10, 1999||Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.||Post-processing device for eliminating blocking artifact and method therefor|
|US5940536||Aug 29, 1996||Aug 17, 1999||Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.||Ringing detector and filter|
|US5970179 *||Aug 18, 1997||Oct 19, 1999||Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd.||Method of and apparatus for filtering image|
|US5974196 *||Mar 15, 1996||Oct 26, 1999||Sony Corporation||Method and apparatus for blocking effect reduction in images|
|US5974197 *||Jul 14, 1997||Oct 26, 1999||Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.||Loop filter and loop filtering method|
|US6041145||Jul 15, 1998||Mar 21, 2000||Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.||Device and method for smoothing picture signal, device and method for encoding picture and device and method for decoding picture|
|US6058210||Sep 15, 1997||May 2, 2000||Xerox Corporation||Using encoding cost data for segmentation of compressed image sequences|
|US6108455||May 29, 1998||Aug 22, 2000||Stmicroelectronics, Inc.||Non-linear image filter for filtering noise|
|US6167164 *||Mar 10, 1998||Dec 26, 2000||Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.||One-dimensional signal adaptive filter for reducing blocking effect and filtering method|
|US6178205||Dec 12, 1997||Jan 23, 2001||Vtel Corporation||Video postfiltering with motion-compensated temporal filtering and/or spatial-adaptive filtering|
|US6188799 *||Feb 6, 1998||Feb 13, 2001||Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.||Method and apparatus for removing noise in still and moving pictures|
|US6192081||Oct 26, 1995||Feb 20, 2001||Sarnoff Corporation||Apparatus and method for selecting a coding mode in a block-based coding system|
|US6195632||Nov 25, 1998||Feb 27, 2001||Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.||Extracting formant-based source-filter data for coding and synthesis employing cost function and inverse filtering|
|US6222641||Jul 1, 1998||Apr 24, 2001||Electronics For Imaging, Inc.||Method and apparatus for image descreening|
|US6226050||Apr 3, 1998||May 1, 2001||Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.||Signal adaptive filtering method for reducing ringing noise and signal adaptive filter|
|US6246802||Oct 31, 1997||Jun 12, 2001||Nec Corporation||Image data processor|
|US6259823||Oct 22, 1997||Jul 10, 2001||Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.||Signal adaptive filtering method and signal adaptive filter for reducing blocking effect and ringing noise|
|US6320987||Oct 16, 1998||Nov 20, 2001||Neo Paradigm Labs, Inc.||Pre-DCT residue filter|
|US6360014||Sep 24, 1998||Mar 19, 2002||Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.||Image decoding method, image decoding apparatus, and data recording medium|
|US6360024 *||Jul 6, 2000||Mar 19, 2002||Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.||Method and apparatus for removing noise in still and moving pictures|
|US6381275||Dec 4, 1996||Apr 30, 2002||Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha||Image coding apparatus and image decoding apparatus|
|US6385245||Sep 18, 1998||May 7, 2002||Us Philips Corporation||Motion estimation and motion-compensated interpolition|
|US6415055||Dec 12, 1995||Jul 2, 2002||Sony Corporation||Moving image encoding method and apparatus, and moving image decoding method and apparatus|
|US6463182 *||Dec 23, 1996||Oct 8, 2002||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Image processing apparatus and method for removing noise near an edge of an image|
|US6504873 *||Jun 9, 1998||Jan 7, 2003||Nokia Mobile Phones Ltd.||Filtering based on activities inside the video blocks and at their boundary|
|US6529638||Feb 1, 1999||Mar 4, 2003||Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.||Block boundary artifact reduction for block-based image compression|
|US6535643||Oct 29, 1999||Mar 18, 2003||Lg Electronics Inc.||Method for recovering compressed motion picture for eliminating blocking artifacts and ring effects and apparatus therefor|
|US6594400||Aug 24, 1999||Jul 15, 2003||Lg Electronics Inc.||Method of removing block phenomenon and ring phenomenon in compression coded image|
|US6631162||Jun 18, 1998||Oct 7, 2003||Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.||Signal adaptive filtering method, signal adaptive filter and computer readable medium for storing program therefor|
|US6665346||Apr 30, 1999||Dec 16, 2003||Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.||Loop-filtering method for image data and apparatus therefor|
|US7054503 *||Feb 25, 2002||May 30, 2006||Seiko Epson Corporation||Image processing system, image processing method, and image processing program|
|US7162090 *||Feb 25, 2003||Jan 9, 2007||Seiko Epson Corporation||Image processing apparatus, image processing program and image processing method|
|US7215823 *||Jul 12, 2002||May 8, 2007||Seiko Epson Corporation||Deblocking and deringing apparatus, program and method|
|US7302104 *||Dec 27, 2002||Nov 27, 2007||Ricoh Co., Ltd.||Smoothing tile boundaries of images encoded and decoded by JPEG 2000|
|US7305142 *||Jan 4, 2007||Dec 4, 2007||Lg Electronics Inc.||Method of reducing a blocking artifact when coding moving picture|
|US20030044080 *||Sep 5, 2002||Mar 6, 2003||Emblaze Systems Ltd||Method for reducing blocking artifacts|
|US20040179610||Nov 26, 2003||Sep 16, 2004||Jiuhuai Lu||Apparatus and method employing a configurable reference and loop filter for efficient video coding|
|US20050147319||Jun 7, 2004||Jul 7, 2005||Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.||System and method for removing ringing artifacts|
|US20050196066 *||Jul 14, 2004||Sep 8, 2005||Changsung Kim||Method and apparatus for removing blocking artifacts of video picture via loop filtering using perceptual thresholds|
|US20050201633||Mar 11, 2005||Sep 15, 2005||Daeyang Foundation||Method, medium, and filter removing a blocking effect|
|US20060078055 *||Oct 11, 2005||Apr 13, 2006||Sadayoshi Kanazawa||Signal processing apparatus and signal processing method|
|US20070140574 *||Nov 8, 2006||Jun 21, 2007||Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba||Decoding apparatus and decoding method|
|US20070258657 *||May 5, 2006||Nov 8, 2007||Ken Kryda||Method and apparatus providing adaptive noise suppression|
|US20070292042 *||Aug 29, 2007||Dec 20, 2007||Lg Electronics Inc.||Method of reducing a blocking artifact when coding moving picture|
|US20070292043 *||Aug 29, 2007||Dec 20, 2007||Lg Electronics Inc.||Method of reducing a blocking artifact when coding moving picture|
|JPH09326024A||Title not available|
|JPS6470719A||Title not available|
|WO1999004497A2||Jun 18, 1998||Jan 28, 1999||Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.||Signal adaptive filtering method, signal adaptive filter and computer readable medium for storing program therefor|
|1||Korean Office Action dated Jul. 18, 2005, with English translation.|
|2||Pang, Khee K. et al. "Optimum Loop Filter in Hybrid Coders." IEEE Circuits And Systems For Video Technology, vol.4, No. 2, Apr. 1994, pp. 158-167.|
|3||U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 16, 2010 for corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 11/785,086.|
|4||Yang et al. "Iterative Projecton Algorithms For Removing the Blocking Artifacts of Bock-DCT Compressed Images." IEEE 1993, pp. V405-V408.|
|5||Zakhor. "Iterative Procedures for Reduction of Blocking Effects in Transform Image Coding." IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 2, No. 1, IEEE Mar. 1993, pp. 91-95.|
|U.S. Classification||382/268, 382/261, 358/3.26, 375/240.29|
|International Classification||H04N7/24, H04N7/30, G06T9/00, H04N7/26, G06T5/20, H04N1/409, G06K9/40, H03M13/47, G06T5/00|
|Cooperative Classification||H04N19/80, H04N19/86, G06T5/002, G06T5/20, G06T2207/10016|
|European Classification||G06T5/00D, H04N7/26F, H04N7/26P4, G06T5/20|