|Publication number||USRE41887 E1|
|Application number||US 10/851,983|
|Publication date||Oct 26, 2010|
|Filing date||May 21, 2004|
|Priority date||Mar 10, 1999|
|Also published as||CA2364487A1, EP1165109A1, EP1165109A4, EP2591793A2, EP2591793A3, US6599710, US6660487, US20020123472, USRE43467, WO2000053209A1|
|Publication number||10851983, 851983, US RE41887 E1, US RE41887E1, US-E1-RE41887, USRE41887 E1, USRE41887E1|
|Original Assignee||The General Hospital Corporation|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (59), Non-Patent Citations (231), Classifications (22), Legal Events (3)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application is a continuation-in-part of Ser. No. 09/521,064, filed on Mar. 8, 2000, which, in turn, claims benefit of U.S. provisional application Serial No. 60/123,738, filed on Mar. 10, 1999, both of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Early onset diabetes mellitus, or Type I diabetes, is a severe, childhood, autoimmune disease, characterized by insulin deficiency that prevents normal regulation of blood glucose levels. Insulin is a peptide hormone produced by the β cells within the islets of Langerhans of the pancreas. Insulin promotes glucose utilization, which is important for protein synthesis as well as for the formation and storage of neutral lipids. Glucose is also the primary source of energy for brain and muscle tissue. Type I diabetes is caused by an autoimmune reaction that results in complete destruction of the β cells of the pancreas, which eliminates insulin production and eventually results in hyperglycemia and ketoacidosis.
Insulin injection therapy has been useful in preventing severe hyperglycemia and ketoacidosis, but fails to completely normalize blood glucose levels. Although insulin injection therapy has been quite successful, it does not prevent the premature vascular deterioration that is the leading cause of morbidity among diabetics today. Diabetes-related vascular deterioration, which includes both microvascular deterioration and acceleration of atherosclerosis, can eventually cause renal failure, retinal deterioration, angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, peripheral neuropathy, and atherosclerosis.
A promising treatment for diabetes, islet transplantation, has been in human clinical trials for over ten years. Unfortunately, the results where Type I diabetes is the underlying etiology are poor. There have been many successes with islet transplantation in animals, but only where the animals are diabetic due to chemical treatment, rather than natural disease. The only substantiated peer reviewed studies using non-barrier and non-toxic methods and showing success with islet transplants in naturally diabetic mice use isogeneic (self) islets. The isogenic islets were transplanted into already diabetic NOD mice pre-treated with TNF-alpha (tumor necrosis factor-alpha); BCG (bacillus Calmette-Guerin, an attenuated strain of mycobacterium bovis); and CFA (complete Freund's adjuvant), which is an inducer of TNF-alpha (Rabinovitch et al., J. Immunol. (1997)159(12): 6298-303). This approach is not clinically applicable primarily because syngeneic islets are not available. In the allograft setting of islet transplantation, the grafts are rejected presumably due to autoimmunity. Furthermore, diabetic host treatments such as body irradiation and bone marrow transplantation are too toxic in Type I diabetes patients, rendering the short-term alternative of insulin therapy more attractive.
I previously developed a transplant method to introduce allogeneic and xenogeneic tissues into non-immunosuppressed hosts, in which the cells are modified such that the donor antigens are disguised from the host's immune system (Faustman U.S. Pat. No. 5,283,058, hereby incorporated by reference). Generally, masked islets or transgenic islets with ablated class I are only partially protected from recurrent autoimmunity in spontaneous non-obese diabetic (NOD) mice (Markmann et al., Transplantation (1992) 54(6): 1085-9). There exists the need for a treatment for diabetes and other autoimmune diseases that baits the autoimmune process.
The present invention provides a novel method for reversing existing autoimmunity.
Accordingly, the invention provides a method for increasing or maintaining the number of functional cells of a predetermined type (e.g., islet cells) in a mammal, involving the steps of: (a) providing a sample of cells of the predetermined type, (b) treating the cells to modify the presentation of an antigen of the cells that is capable of causing an in vivo autoimmune cell-mediated rejection response, (c) introducing the treated cells into the mammal, and (d) prior to, after, or concurrently with step (c) treating the mammal to kill or inactivate autoimmune cells of the mammal.
In preferred embodiments, step (b) involves eliminating, reducing, or masking the antigen, which is preferably is MHC class I. Such methods are known, and are described, e.g., in Faustman, U.S. Pat. No. 5,283,058.
Preferably, step (d) involves administering to the mammal rumor necrosis factor-alpha (“TNF-alpha”), or a TNF-alpha inducing substance, (i.e., an agonist). As will be explained in more detail below, the TNF-alpha signaling pathway is an inflammatory pathway that effectively brings about killing of the autoimmune cells that attack the desired cells. There are many methods for stimulating TNF-alpha production, including the following: vaccination with killed bacteria or toxoids, e.g., BCG, cholera toxoid, or diphtheria toxoid; induction of limited viral infections; administration of LPS, interleukin-1, or UV light; activation of TNF-alpha producing cells such as macrophages, B-lymphocytes and some subsets of T-lymphocytes; or administration of the chemotatic peptide fMET-Leu-Phe; CFA-pacellus toxoid, Mycobaterium bovis bacillus, TACE (a metalloproteinase that mediates cellular TNF-alpha release), hydrozamates, p38 mitogen activated protein (“MAP”) kinase, and viral antigens that activate NFKB transcription factors that normally protect the cells from apoptosis (i.e., cell death).
Killing of undesired autoimmune cells can also be accomplished by administering agents that act as agonists for the enzyme, TNF-alpha converting enzyme, that cleaves the TNF-alpha precursor to produce biologically active TNF-alpha.
Autoimmune cells can also be killed by administering agents that disrupt the pathways that normally protect autoimmune cells from cell death, including soluble forms of antigen receptors such as CD28 on autoreactive T cells, CD40 on B cells that are involved in protection of autoimmune cells, and CD95 (i.e., Fas) on T-lymphocytes. Other such agents include p75NTF p75TNF and lymphotoxin Beta receptor (LtbetaR).
The methods of the invention in some respects run counter to current treatment regimens for autoimmune diseases. Many of the major approved therapies for such diseases involve the administration of anti-inflammatory drugs that inhibit the production of TNF-alpha, including COX-2 inhibitors, and TNF antagonists. My studies indicate that these conventional therapies are actually deleterious, in that they bring about expansion of the population of harmful autoimmune cells in the patient, increasing the number and severity of lesions and autoreactive infiltrates. In addition, many of these anti-autoimmune inflammatory drug therapies cause severe re-bound disease after discontinuation. For example, treatment with anti-inflammatory agents actually increases the number of lymphocyte infiltrates in the pancreas of a diabetic. Once treatment is discontinued, these lymphocytes regain their normal function, resulting in a heightened autoimmune response.
The methods of the invention can be used to treat any of the major HLA class II-linked autoimmune diseases characterized by disruption in MHC class I peptide presentation and TNF-alpha sensitivity. These diseases include, for example, type I diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, SLE, and multiple scelorosis. The method can be used in any mammal, e.g., human patients, who have early pre-symptomatic signs of disease, or who have established autoimmunity.
The invention also provides a method for increasing or maintaining the number of a predetermined type e.g., islet cells, in a mammal by the steps of (a) treating the mammal with an agent that kills or inactivates autoimmune cells of the mammal; (b) periodically monitoring the cell death rate of the autoimmune cells; and (c) periodically adjusting the dosage of the agent based on the information obtained in monitoring step (b).
In any of the methods of the invention in which TNF-alpha is administered or stimulated, two agents can be used together for that purpose, e.g., TNF-alpha and IL-1 can be used in combination therapy, as can any other combinations of agents.
In addition, the invention provides a method for diagnosing an autoimmune disease or predisposition to such a disease in a mammal (e.g., a human patient). The method includes the steps of (a) providing peripheral cells from a mammal; (b) treating these cells with a TNF-alpha treatment regimen and; (c) detecting cell death in the peripheral cells, where an increase in cell death, when compared with control cells, is taken as an indication that the mammal has an autoimmune disease or predisposition to such disease. This diagnostic method can be used for any mammal, however, the preferred mammal is a human patient. Peripheral cells that can be used in this method are, for example, splenocytes, T lymphocytes, B lymphocytes, or cells of bone marrow origin and in step (b) of the method, these cells are preferably treated with TNF-alpha.
By “functional cell,” is meant cells that carry out their normal in vivo activity. In certain preferred embodiments of the invention, it is preferred that the cells are capable of expressing endogenous self peptide in the context of MHC class I.
By “predetermined type,” when used in reference to functional cells, is meant that one may select a specific cell type. For example, one skilled in the art may decide to carry out the method of the present invention in order to increase or maintain the number of functional islet cells in the pancreas. In this example, the predetermined cell type is islet cells.
By “class I and peptide” is meant MHC class I presentation of peptide (i.e., self peptide) on the cell surface. Cytoplasmic antigens are believed to be processed into peptides by cytoplasmic proteases and at least in part by the proteasome, a multicatalytic proteinase complex of which the Lmp2 protein, discussed herein, is associated. The process of MHC class I presentation is thought to include formation of a complex between the newly synthesized MHC class I molecule, including a glycosylated heavy chain non-covalently associated with β2-microglobulin, and peptide within the rough endoplasmic reticulum of the cell. Thus, “class I and peptide” refers to the MHC class I/peptide complex as it is presented on the cell surface for education of the immune system.
By “killing” or “kills” is meant to cause cell death by apoptosis. Apoptosis can be mediated by any cell death pathway. According to the present invention, cells that are susceptible to killing are defective in protection from apoptosis due to a defect in a cell death pathway.
“Autoimmune cells,” as used herein, includes cells that are defective in protection from apoptosis. This defect in protection from apoptosis can be in the pathway linked to TNF-induced apoptosis, or an apoptotic pathway unrelated to TNF. Autoimmune cells of the present invention include, for example, adult splenocytes, T lymphocytes, B lymphocytes, and cells of bone marrow origin, such as defective antigen presenting cells of a mammal.
By “defective” or “defect” is meant a defect in protection from apoptosis.
By “exposure” is meant exposure of a mammal to MHC class I and peptide (i.e., self peptide or endogenous peptide) by any means known in the art. In one preferred embodiment, exposure to MHC class I and peptide is carried out by administering to the mammal an MHC class I/peptide complex. In other preferred embodiments, exposure to MHC class I and peptide occurs by exposing the mammal to cells that express MHC class I and peptide.
By “cells capable of expressing MHC class I and peptide” is meant, for example, cells that are class I+ or cells that are class I−/− (e.g., cells having a mutation in the β2M gene) but that are reconstituted in vivo by a compensatory component (e.g., serum β2M).
By “maintenance of normal blood glucose levels” is meant that a mammal is treated, for example, by insulin injection or by implantation of a euglycemic clamp in vivo, depending on the host being treated.
By “lmp2 gene or an equivalent thereof,” is meant a cell that has a defect in prevention of apoptotic cell death, for example, a cell that has an ablation at a critical point in an apoptotic cell death pathway. In another aspect, “lmp2 gene or an equivalent thereof” means that a cell has a mutation in the lmp2 gene or a gene that carries out a function the same as or similar to the lmp2 gene (i.e., a gene encoding a proteasome subunit). Alternatively, the phrase “lmp2 gene or an equivalent thereof” can be used to refer to a cell that has a mutation in a gene that encodes a regulator of the lmp2 gene or another component of the proteasome complex. For example, a human homolog of the murine lmp2 gene is an equivalent of the lmp2 gene according to the present invention. As but another example, a gene that carries out the same or similar function as the lmp2 gene, but that has a low amino acid sequence similarity, would also be considered as an equivalent of the lmp2 gene according to the present invention.
“Combination therapy,” or “combined therapy,” as used herein, refers to the two-part treatment for increasing the number of functional cells of a predetermined type that includes both (1) ablation of autoimmune cells, and (2) re-education of the host immune system.
By “TNF-alpha induction,” “TNF-alpha treatment regimen,” or “TNF-alpha” includes the administration of TNF-alpha, agents that induce TNF-alpha expression or activity, TNF-alpha agonists, agents that stimulate TNF-alpha signaling, or agents that act on pathways that cause accelerated cell death of autoimmune cells, according to the invention. Stimulation of TNF-alpha induction (e.g., by administration of CFA) is preferably carried out prior to, after, or during administration (via implantation or injection) of cells in vivo.
By “effective,” is meant that the dose of TNF-alpha, or TNF-alpha inducing agent, administered, increases or maintains the number of functional cells of a predetermined type in an autoimmune individual, while minimizing the toxic effects of TNF-alpha administration. Typically, an effective dose is a reduced dose, compared to doses previously shown to be ineffective at treating autoimmune disease, particularly established autoimmune disease.
The methods of the invention provide, for the first time, effective reversal of naturally-occurring (as opposed to chemically induced) mediated diseases such as type I diabetes.
Other features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following description of the preferred embodiment thereof, and from the claims.
The present invention provides a method of increasing or maintaining the number of functional cells of a predetermined type in a mammal by preventing cell death. In preferred embodiments, this method is used to treat an autoimmune disease where endogenous cell and/or tissue regeneration is desired. Such autoimmune diseases include, without limitation, diabetes melitus mellitus, multiple sclerosis, premature ovarian failure, scleroderm scleroderma, Sjogren's disease, lupus, vilelego, alopecia (baldness), polyglandular failure, Grave's disease, hypothyroidism, polymyosititis, pempligus pemphigus, Chron's Crohn's disease, colititis, autoimmune hepatitis, hypopituitarism, myocardititis, Addison's disease, autoimmune skin diseases, uveititis, pernicious anemia, hypoparathyroidism, and rheumatoid arthritis. One aspect of the invention provides a novel two-part therapeutic approach to ablate existing autoimmunity while re-educating the immune system via MHC class I and peptide. A key feature of the invention is the discovery that reexpression of endogenous antigens in the context of class I MHC is essential to terminate an ongoing autoimmune response.
As mentioned above, Type I diabetes results from destruction of the cells of the Islet of Langerhans of the pancreas via a severe autoimmune process. The goal for treatment of Type I diabetic patients is to permanently halt the gaff autoimmune process so that pancreatic islets are preserved. Alternatively, in cases where islet destruction from autoimmunity is complete, the goal is to provide a method of replacing islet cells, or allowing them to regenerate. Thus, the invention provides a novel method for increasing or maintaining the number of functional cells of a predetermined type for treatment of established cases of diabetes melitus mellitus, where existing autoimmunity is reversed.
In adult onset diabetes, or Type II diabetes, the β islet cells of the pancreas are often defective in secretion of insulin. However, recent studies indicate that, in some patients, autoimmune destruction of β islet cells docs play an important role in disease progression (Willis et al., Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. (1998) 42(1):49-53). Thus, the present invention may also be used to treat Type II diabetes where an autoimmune component is present.
Relating the Present Invention to Known Genetic and Functional Information
Genetic and functional studies have identified mutations in the lmp2 gene in NOD diabetic mice, a murine model for human type I diabetes (Li et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA (1994) 91:11128-32; Yan et al., J. Immunol. (1997) 159:3068-80; Fu et al, Annals of the New York Academy of sciences (1998) 842:138-55; Hayashi et al., Molec. Cell. Biol. (1999) 19:8646-59). Lmp 2 is an essential subunit of the proteasome, a multi-subunit particle responsible for processing a large number of intracellular proteins. The pronounced proteasome defect in Lmp2 results in defective production and activation of the transcription factor NFKB through impaired proteolytic processing of NFKB to generate NFKB subunits p50 and p52 and impaired degradation of the NFKB inhibitory protein, IKB. NFKB plays an important role in immune and inflammatory responses as well as in preventing apoptosis induced by tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha). Autoreactive lymphoid cells expressing the lmp2 defect are selectively eliminated by treatment with TNF-alpha, or any TNF-alpha inducing agent, such as complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA), or an agent that acts on a pathway required for cell death protection, for example, any pathway converging on the defective apoptotic activation mechanism. This is well illustrated by faulty apoptosis protection in the NOD mouse which lacks formation of protective NFKB complexes.
The lmp2 gene is genetically linked to the MHC locus (Hayashi et al., supra). Antigen presenting cells of NOD mice cease production of LMP2 protein at approximately 5-6 weeks, a process that terminates the proper processing of endogenous peptides for display in the context of MHC class I on the cell surface. Surface display of endogenous peptide in the context of MHC class I molecules is essential for the selective elimination of T cells reactive to self antigens (Faustman et al., Science (1991) 254:1756-61; Ashton-Rickardt et al., Cell (1993) 73:1041-9; Aldrich et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (1994) 91(14):6525-8; Glas et al., J. Exp. Med. (1994) 179:661-72). Current theory suggests that interruption of endogenous peptide presentation via MHC class I prevents proper T cell education and is responsible for a diverse array of autoimmune diseases (Faustman et al., supra; Fu et al., J. Clin. Invest. (1993) 91:2301-7). These data are also consistent with the clear sex-, tissue-, and age-specific differences in the expression of this error which parallel the initiation and disease course of insulin-dependent (type I) diabetes. It is hypothesized that the trigger for the initiation of autotimmunity is the tissue-and developmental-specific dysregulation of the proteasome (or MHC class I) in islet cells, as opposed to lymphocytes. As mentioned above, it is possible that this defect triggers a pathologic T cell response to islet cells via interruption of proper T cell education (Hayashi et al., supra).
In a normal, non-diabetic, human or animal, peripheral tissues, including islets, consistently express endogenous antigens in the context of MHC class I (Hayashi et al., supra). Constitutive tissue-specific display of self peptide via MHC class I could maintain peripheral tolerance in the context of properly selected lymphocytes (Vidal-Puig et al., Transplant (1994) 26:3314-6; Markiewicz et al. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (1998) 95(6):3065-70). In the absence of such tissue-specific display, poor negative selection of T-lymphocytes could lead to overexpansion of self-reactive lymphocytes, a prominent feature in human and murine disease models.
As mentioned above, autoreactive lymphoid cells expressing the lmp2 defect are selectively eliminated, for example, by treatment with TNF-alpha, or any TNF-alpha inducing agent, such as complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA). Although the specific gene defect has not been identified in human autoimmune patients, it is known that human splenocytes in the human diabetic patient, like murine splenocytes in the NOD mouse, have defects in resistance to TNF-alpha induced apoptosis (Hayashi et al., supra). Specific cells in human autoimmune patients might express a genetic defect, similar to the proteasome defect in mice, that increases susceptibility to TNF-alpha induced apoptosis or an analogous apoptotic cell death pathway. Therefore, in patients expressing the genetic defect, only the autoimmune cells are killed. Permanently eliminating the autoreactive cells is a key feature of an effective treatment for an autoimmune disease.
According to the present non-limiting theory, of the invention, multiple cell death pathways exist in a cell and any one or more of these cell death-related pathways may be defective, accentuating the sensitivity of these cells to cell death. For example, susceptibility to TNF-alpha induced apoptosis could occur via a failed cell death inhibition pathway (e.g., by defective production and activation of the transcription factor NFKB, as in the NOD mouse). Further, it is well known that there are two different TNF-alpha receptors. Defective signaling through either receptor could render autoimmune cells susceptible to TNF-alpha induced apoptosis. As but another example, defective cell signaling through surface receptors that stimulate pathways that interact with the cell death pathway, i.e., LPS, IL-1, TPA, UV light etc., could render autoimmune cells susceptible to apoptosis according to the theory of the present invention. Therefore, methods of the present invention that are beneficial in the treatment of autoimmune disease are applicable to any autoimmune patient that has a defect in a cell death pathway.
As mentioned above, current therapies for autoimmune disease are directed toward decreasing the inflammatory reaction that is thought to be responsible for destruction of self. TNF-alpha is part of the inflammatory response. Thus, according to the present theory, induction of an inflammatory response, rather than inhibition of an inflammatory response, is the preferred method of treating an autoimmune individual. This theory runs counter to existing dogma surrounding autoimmune therapy today.
It is possible that TNF-alpha is inducing a cytokine, toxoid, or other related molecule induced in the inflammatory response that is the responsible for the benefit of TNF-alpha treatment. If so, induction of inflammation via TNF-alpha treatment is still in agreement with the theory of the invention. In a preferred embodiment, induction of inflammation via TNF-alpha treatment induces mediators of autoimmune cell death.
A Novel Assay for Monitoring Treatment
It is well known that prolonged TNF-alpha treatment by itself is highly toxic. In light of the elucidation of the cell death pathway described above, we hypothesized that the knowledge of this pathway could enable development of a sensitive in vitro assay that could be used to monitor the in vivo effect of a particular TNF-alpha treatment regimen (i.e., any treatment regimen that results in induction of TNF-alpha and inflammation). More particularly, a monitoring system could be developed that combined the administration of TNF-alpha alone with an assay capable of measuring the effect of TNF-alpha treatment on apoptosis of autoimmune cells in a mammal diagnosed with an autoimmune disease. Such a monitoring system would make it possible to measure the effect of particular doses of TNF-alpha on the apoptosis of autoimmune cells concurrently with treatment of an autoimmune individual. Moreover, such a monitoring system would enable optimization or adjustment of the dose of TNF-alpha (i.e., or TNF-alpha inducing agent) to maximize autoimmune cell death, while minimizing exposure of the mammal to toxic doses of TNF-alpha.
Thus, the invention provides a method of increasing or maintaining the number of functional cells of a predetermined type in a mammal that involves a) treating a mammal to kill or inactivate autoimmune cells of the mammal; b) periodically monitoring the cell death rate of the autoimmune cells (i.e., by assaying the cell death rate of autoimmune cells in the mammal, wherein an increase in cell death rate of auto reactive T-lymphocytes indicates an increase in the number of functional cells of the predetermined type (i.e., resistant to cell death)); and (c) periodically adjusting the dosage of the agent based on the information obtained in step (b). The autoimmune cells of the present invention include any cell defective in protection from apoptotic cell death by any stimulus, for example, TNF-alpha, CD40, CD40L, CD28, IL1, Fas, FasL, etc.
The assay of step (b) allows one to identify novel formulations of TNF-alpha, TNF-alpha inducing agents, TNF-alpha agonists, or agents that act on the TNF-alpha signaling pathway effective in inducing apoptosis of T-lymphocytes or antigen presenting cells, that can be administered over a longer course of treatment than was possible prior to the present invention (e.g., preferably over a period of months, more preferably over a period of years, most preferably over a lifetime).
In a related embodiment, the present monitoring system may be used to identify new doses, durations of treatment, and treatment regimens for TNF-inducing agents that were previously discounted as useful treatments because there was no way to monitor their effect. For example, in contrast to a preliminary report identifying BCG, a TNF-alpha inducing agent, as a useful type I diabetes treatment (Shehadeh et al., Lancet, (1994) 343:706), researchers failed to identify a therapeutic dose of BCG because there was no way to monitor the effect of BCG in vivo (Allen et al., Diabetes Care (1999) 22:1703; Graves et al., Diabetes Care (1999) 22:1694).
The assay of step (b) may also be used to tailor TNF-alpha induction therapy to the needs of a particular individual. For example, as mentioned above, in one preferred embodiment, the assay of step (b) can be carried out every day or every other day in order to measure the effect of TNF-induction therapy and/or cell death inducing agents on autoimmune cell death rate so that adjustment to the administered dose, duration of treatment (i.e., the period of time over which the patient will receive the treatment), or treatment regimen (i.e., how many times the treatment will be administered to the patient) of TNF-alpha can be made to optimize the effect of TNF-alpha treatment and minimize the exposure of the patient to TNF-alpha or other cell death inducing agents. Of course, the skilled artisan will appreciate that the assay can be performed at any time deemed necessary to assess the effect of a particular regimen of TNF-alpha induction therapy on a particular individual (i.e., during remission of disease or in a pre-autoimmune individual).
The assay can be used to tailor a particular TNF-alpha induction regimen to any given autoimmune disease. For example, the in vitro monitoring of selective killing of autoimmune cells can be used to selectively grade the drug (i.e., adjust the dose administered to maximize the therapeutic effect). The monitoring system described herein can be used to monitor in vivo trials of TNF-alpha treatment by continuously measuring the elimination of autoimmune cells, e.g., autoreactive T lymphocytes, with continuing sensitivity. Of course, the skilled artisan will appreciate that the present monitoring system can be used to measure the effect of TNF-alpha on in vivo killing of autoimmune cells in cases where TNF-alpha-induction therapy is cited in conjunction with any other therapy, e.g., T cell re-education, as described herein.
It is well known that TNF-alpha induction therapy has been shown to be ineffective in patients with established autoimmunity, e.g., established diabetes, but is effective in patients in a pre-autoimmune state, e.g., patients in a pre-diabetic or pre-lupus state. In addition, it has been established that TNF-alpha induction in adult NOD and NZB mice (a murine strain susceptible to lupus-like disease) decreases diabetic or lupus symptoms respectively. According to the invention, TNF-alpha therapy can be effective even in patients with established disease, by monitoring the elimination of autoimmune cells and optimizing the dose, duration of treatment, and/or re-treatment schedule accordingly. Thus, the assay of step (b) may be used to identify an effective dose, duration of treatment, or treatment regimen of TNF-alpha (e.g., lower than doses previously shown to be ineffective in treatment of diabetes, particularly in the treatment of established diabetes) that can be used as an effective treatment for autoimmune disease.
In another preferred embodiment, the assay of step (b) is used to identify a dose, duration of treatment, or treatment regimen of TNF-alpha that can reduce or eliminate side effects associated with a particular autoimmune disease. A particular dose of TNF-alpha may be identified that reduces or eliminates the symptoms associated with, for example, vascular collapse associated with diabetes, blindness or kidney failure associated with Type 1 diabetes, or skin eruptions associated with lupus. It is well established that it is the side effects associated with the autoimmune reaction that are often responsible for mortality of autoimmune patients. Thus, in one preferred embodiment, the monitoring system of the present invention identifies a treatment regimen for TNF-alpha that reduces the symptoms and/or complications of the autoimmune disease, such that the quality of life of the patient is improved and/or the life-span of the patient being treated is prolonged. In a related embodiment, the monitoring system of the present invention identifies a treatment regimen for TNF-alpha that prevents disease progression or even halts disease in a patient diagnosed with an autoimmune disease.
Thus, in another aspect, the present invention provides a monitoring system for measuring the rate of cell death in an autoimmune mammal, including (a) a treatment regimen for killing or inactivating autoimmune cells in a mammal; and (b) an assay capable of measuring the effect of the treatment regimen on the cell death rate of autoimmune cells in the mammal, wherein an increase in cell death rate indicates an decrease in autoimmunity.
In Vitro Assay for Monitoring Cell Death
The present invention provides a novel assay for monitoring apoptosis of autoimmune cells in a mammal. In one preferred embodiment, the present invention provides an assay involving (a) isolating a blood sample from a mammal, preferably a human, and (b) testing the blood sample in vitro for killing of autoimmune cells compared to non-autoimmune cells using techniques available in the art. As mentioned above, non-autoimmune cells are generally resistant to TNF-alpha induced apoptosis. An increase in cell death in autoimmune cells compared to non-autoimmune cells indicates that the dose of TNF-alpha or other cell death inducing agent is sufficient to induce killing of the autoimmune cells or defective bone marrow origin cells.
Combined TNF Induction Therapy
The present invention also features a drug combination that includes two or more TNF-alpha inducing agents. One particularly preferred combined TNF-alpha treatment is the combination of TNF-alpha and IL1. This treatment strategy goes against the current dogma surrounding treatment of autoimmune disease. For example, at the TNF Second International Meeting (A Validated Target with Multiple Therapeutic Potential, Feb. 24-25, 1999, Princeton, N.J., USA) it was disclosed that a combination of anti-TNF-alpha antibody and anti-IL1 would be advantageous in the treatment of autoimmune disease. The treatment of the present invention discloses induction of inflammation, which is the opposite of the treatment believed to be effective by those skilled in the art, that is, suppression of inflammation. Of course, in the current treatment, inflammation does not occur because the inflammatory cells actually die prior to arriving at the target site or are killed at the target site.
Of course, the present invention is not limited to a combined TNF inducing therapy that includes only the combination of TNF-alpha and IL1, but includes any combination of TNF-alpha-including therapies, e.g., vaccination with BCG etc., viral infection, LPS, activation of cells that normally produce TNF-alpha (i.e., macrophages, B cells, and T cells), the chemotactic peptide fMet-Leu-Phe, bacterial and viral proteins that activate NFKB, agents that induce signaling pathways involved in adaptive immune responses (i.e., antigen receptors on B and T cells, CD28 on T cells, CD40 on B cells), agents that stimulate specific autoreactive cell death receptors (i.e., TNF, Fas (CD95), CD40, p75NF p75TNF, and lymphotoxin Beta-receptor (LtbetaR), drugs that stimulate TNF-alpha converting enzyme (TACE) which cleaves the TNF-alpha precursor (i.e., to provide biological activity capable of stimulating enhanced production or enhanced cytokine life after secretion) etc.
Identification of Inflammation-inducing Agents
In preferred embodiments, the present invention provides inflammatory agents for the treatment of autoimmune disease that are counter to the anti-inflammatories used to treat autoimmune diseases today. For example, current methods for treating autoimmune disease include TNF-alpha antagonists. Thus, the present invention provides TNF-alpha agonists (i.e., chemicals, peptides, or antibodies) that act on a TNF-alpha receptor. Other preferred treatments could fall under the categories of drugs that act in opposite to anti-TNF-alpha agonists, anti-TNF-alpha antibodies, TNFR2 fusion proteins (Immunex), Embrel, anti-IL1 therapies, TNF-alpha convertase inhibitors, p38 MAP kinase inhibitors, phoshodiesterase inhibitors, thalidomide analogs, and adenosine receptor agonists.
In another preferred embodiment, the invention allows for the identification of drugs that induce cell death or selectively hamper the autoimmune cells by binding to cell surface receptors or interacting with intracellular proteins. For example, drugs that stimulate the IL-1 pathway or drugs that interact with converging pathways such as Fas, FasL, TACI, ATAR, RANK, DR5, DR4, DCR2, DCR1, DR3, etc. The drugs of the present invention can be characterized in that they only kill autoimmune cells having a selective defect in a cell death pathway which can be characterized by two distinct phenotypes, (1) defects in antigen presentation for T cell education and (2) susceptibility to apoptosis.
It will be appreciated that the above-described assay for monitoring death of autoimmune cells can be used to identify novel TNF-alpha inducing agents and other inflammatory agents useful in the present invention. In preferred embodiments, autoimmune cells (i.e., an autoimmune cell isolated from a mammal diagnosed with autoimmune disease) are exposed to a putative inflammatory or TNF-alpha inducing agent and assayed for increased cell death, an increase in cell death of autoimmune cells compared to non-immune cells indicating identification of a drug according to the present invention. Furthermore, autoimmune blood could be exposed to chemical libraries for preferred and selective cell death of yet unknown targets compared to non-autoimmune cells. A wide variety of chemical libraries are available in the art and can be screened by use of the assay of the invention, which measures the rate of apoptosis of autoimmune cells.
In a related aspect, the above-described assay for monitoring death of autoimmune cells can be used to identify autoimmune cells having the two distinct phenotypes described above. In contrast to typical genetic approaches for identifying cells carrying genetic defects, sensitivity to cell death may serve as the initial identification marker. Once cell-death sensitive cells are identified, they can be assessed as to whether they also have the class I antigen presentation defect. Thus, the present invention provides a method of identifying autoimmune cells by (1) assaying the cells for a susceptibility to apoptosis and (2) assaying for defects in antigen presentation required for T cell education.
A Novel Combination Therapy
The data presented in Table 1 and described in detail in Example 1, below, demonstrate the remarkable success of combining two methods to induce long-term normoglycemia with islet allograft transplantation in an already diabetic NOD host. The invention combines two therapies aimed at two separate targets of the immune system. The invention tests this concept by combining my prior transplantation technology with an autoimmune strategy to thwart the underlying disease, and for the first time provides long-term normoglycemia in naturally diabetic hosts via transplantation with allogeneic islets. Thus, the invention, views the rejection problem as one involving two immune barriers, i.e., the graft rejection barrier and the recurrent autoimmunity barrier. To address the graft rejection barrier, I used donor antigen modified islets, and for the recurrent autoimmune barrier I used CFA, a strong inducer of TNF-alpha.
2, 2, 3, 9, 23
5, 9, 12, 12,
17, 18, 71
5, 5, 7, 10
5, 10, 12, 13
12, 26, 30,
10, 10, 10
5, 14, 32,
*IDDM stands for insulin-dependent diabetes melitus.
Table 1, above, represents a series of experiments that were carried out in which host mice were treated to prevent recurrent autoimmunity, via killing or inactivation of autoreactive lymphocytes, and then transplanted with donor islet cells in which rejection triggering antigens had been eliminated or modified.
The mice were injected once intraperitoneally with complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA) (25 μl/mouse) to induce TNF-alpha.
The same day, islet cell transplantation was carried out as follows. The donor antigen modified islet cells were isolated from transgenic β2M (β2 microglobulin) knockout mice purchased from the Jackson Labs. As mentioned above, the β2M gene encodes a critical chaperone protein essential for surface expression of class I proteins. Host β2M, a highly conserved protein, can in part re-constitute β2M.
Transgenic or normal islet cells were transplanted into nine groups of mice. Three of the groups (groups 6, 7, and 8) were pre-treated with CFA; the other six groups were not pre-treated.
As is shown in Table 1, naturally diabetic mice (NOD-IDDM) that received transgenic transplants but were not pre-treated with CFA (group 2) had mean survival times of 20 days, suggesting that the protection of donor tissue from graft rejection does not protect the tissue from an established autoimmunity. Likewise, group 7 establishes that host treatment with CFA, an immunomodulator now believed to modify exclusively the autoimmune response, does not protect normal allogeneic donor cells from rapid graft rejection. In contrast, the CFA treated diabetic mice receiving transgenic transplants (groups 6 and 8) survived over 57 days (mean). The remaining groups were additional controls: group 1 (no CFA; diabetic host, non-transgenic donor cells); group 3 (no CFA; non-diabetic host, non-transgenic donor cells); group 4 (no CFA; non-diabetic host; non-transgenic donor cells); and group 7 (CFA; diabetic host; non-transgenic donor strain). As is shown in Table 1, the only one of these control groups exhibiting longevity were non-diabetic hosts receiving transgenic donor cells, a therapy known to thwart graft rejection (group 4).
At approximately 120-130 days post transplantation, the transplanted syngeneic and allogeneic islets were removed by nephrectomy. This was a control experiment to prove the animals reverted back to hyperglycemia.
The NOD mice receiving the syngeneic transplant had, within 24 hrs, blood sugars in excess of 500 mg/dl and needed to be sacrificed immediately because of their severe diabetic state. Histology on these mice showed that the transplanted islets in the kidney survived in some cases but did not appear, in all cases, healthy. There were granulated islets, but massive lymphocytic infiltrates surrounded and invaded the islet tissue. The islet invasion by host lymphocytes is a histologic trait indicative of autoreactivity against the islet tissue. The endogenous pancreas demonstrated no surviving islets and was dotted with large lymphocytic clusters, presumably at sites of former islet tissue.
The NOD mice receiving the allogeneic islets, in contrast, remained normoglycemic after the nephrectomies had been performed to remove the allogeneic islet tissue. No change in blood sugar was noted. After approximately seven days of this perfect blood sugar control, the mice were sacrificed. Histologic examination showed that endogenous islets in the pancreas were regenerated. The islet number was less than normal, but the islets present were large, healthy, and had no lymphocyte invasion (although they did have a characteristic NOD rim of lymphocytes surrounding the healthy islet). In contrast, the allogeneic grafts were gone in most cases by this late 120-140 day post-transplantation time point. These results support the thesis that what occurred was rescue and regeneration of the endogenous pancreas. The results support that the immune system was additionally re-educated.
Thus, in one preferred embodiment, the invention provides a method of inhibiting rejection of transplanted islet cells in a diabetic patient, by (a) pre-treating the islet cells to modify, eliminate, or mask islet cell antigen otherwise capable of causing T-lymphocyte-mediated rejection response in a patient, together with (b) treating the patient (prior to, during, or following transplantation) to kill or inactivate autoreactive host lymphocytes that are otherwise capable of killing or damaging the transplanted islet cell.
In preferred embodiments, step (a) involves genetically altering the donor animal so that HLA class I or a molecule in its pathway is genetically deleted or chaperone ablated to prevent surface expression, or masking HLA class I antigen using an antibody F (ab′)2 fragment that forms a complex with HLA class 1; and step (b) involves administering to a patient TNF-alpha, or a TNF-alpha inducing substance, e.g., tissue plasminogen activator (TPA), LPS, IL-1, TV light, such as an interacellular mediator of the TNF-alpha signaling pathway or an inducer of cell death in defective cells.
Class I Antigen Presentation
Prior to the experiments described above, I observed that a small amount of class I ablation was beneficial for the inhibition of rejection of donor islets in diabetic NOD mice (Faustman et al., Science (1991) 252(5013):1700-2). Based on these results, I proposed that a more complete and permanent class I ablation might even be better for long term graft survival. To achieve a more permanent class I ablation, I transplanted F2 islets that were ablated for both the β2M (β2 microglobulin) gene and Tap 1 into already diabetic NOD mice (MHC class I−/−,−−) (see Example 3). The β2M gene encodes a critical chaperone protein essential for surface expression of class I peptides. The Tap 1 gene encodes a protein required for transport of endogenous self-peptides into the endoplasmic reticulum for stable peptide and class I assembly before presentation on the cell surface. Surprisingly, only one of the six mice exhibited long term graft survival. Individual graft survival times (days) for the six mice were: 11, 12, 13, 14, 14, and 71. These unexpected results suggested that the reexpression of peptide and class I was a step that was not only not harmful, but was actually necessary for immune system re-education leading to endogenous islet regeneration and rescue. Thus, in the present application, I propose, without limiting the biochemical mechanism of the invention, that some intact MHC class I molecules are required for the re-education process to occur.
Based on the above-described results, it appears that the graft rejection barrier actually serves two important functions that appear to contribute to successful islet cell regeneration in this model. Temporary class I ablation (class I−/−) serves initially to protect the graft from immediate rejection. Subsequently, MHC class I proteins are reexpressed and exchanged on the graft by 24-72 hours post-transplantation through abundant host β2M proteins from the serum (Anderson et al., J. Immunol. (1975) 114(3):997-1000; Hyafil et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA (1979) 76(11) :5834-8; Schmidt et al., Immunogenetics (1981) 13:483-91; Bernabeu et al., Nature (1984) 308(5960):642-5; Li et al., Transplantation (1993) 55(4):940-6). Surprisingly, subsequent reexpression of endogenous peptide via MHC class I appears to contribute to the reeducation of T lymphocytes with proper negative selection of autoreactive cells. In further support of this observation, I demonstrated, that to be therapeutically effective, at least one MHC class I K or D locus of the donor lymphocytes needed to be matched to the corresponding locus in the NOD host mouse (i.e., either the Kd or Db locus should be present on the donor MHC class I expressing cells). Therefore, the reeducation component of the combination therapy requires that the MHC class I expressing cells, presenting the self-peptide, be semi-syngeneic or fully syngeneic to the autoreactive cells in the NOD host mouse. Coupled with the selective elimination of autoreactive lymphoid cells by treatment with CFA, the present combination therapy provides a powerful treatment for autoimmune disease where regeneration of tissue is desired.
Maintenance of Transplanted Islet Cells is not Required for Regeneration of Endogenous Pancreas
The experiments described above further suggested to me that maintenance of the transplanted islets in vivo might not be necessary for endogenous pancreatic islet cell regeneration. In order to test this theory, transgenic MHC class I−/− islet grafts were transplanted into already diabetic NOD mice with TNF-alpha induction. Transgenic MHC class I−/− islet grafts placed under the kidney of diabetic NOD mice were later removed by nephrectomy at various times post-transplantation. As described in Example 2, all mice remained normoglycemic for at least 120 days after nephrectomy and the pancreatic histology revealed beautiful endogenous pancreatic islet regeneration. In contrast, NOD mice that received syngeneic islet transplants rapidly returned to hyperglycemia post-nephrectomy.
As proposed above, these data support the theory that for endogenous regeneration of islets, or other regenerating tissue subject to immune attack (e.g., hepatic cells), maintenance of the transplanted islet cells is not essential to endogenous pancreatic islet cell regeneration and rescue. Thus, the invention, in one respect, views the problem of tissue regeneration and rescue in autoimmunity as one involving two different barriers, (i.e., the recurrent autoimmunity barrier and the re-education barrier). The required steps for tissue regeneration appear to be: (1) ablate the host autoimmune cells (e.g., by killing or inactivation); and (2) re-educate the immune system with class I and peptide to protect the regenerating pancreas.
Thus, the present invention provides a method of reestablishing systemic tolerance and eliminating existing autoimmunity that promotes regeneration and rescue of cells and tissue.
Treatment by Injection of MHC Class I and Peptide
Based on the discovery that class I peptide presentation is required for re-educating the NOD host and the knowledge that maintenance of transplanted islet cells is not required for endogenous islet cell regeneration, I proposed that islet transplantation and isolation might not be necessary for in situ islet regeneration in setting of autoimmunity. Islet isolation and transplantation are laborious procedures with associated supply and demand limitations in the clinical setting. A procedure for increasing the number of functional islet cells that does not require islet isolation and transplantation would provide great benefit to the treatment of diabetes. This method of treatment could be extended to other autoimmune diseases where immune reeducation is desired (U.S. Pat. No. 5,538,854).
I proposed that mere injection of functional cells expressing class I (class I+), or even MHC class I/peptide complex, into a mammal, with concurrent ablation of autoimmune cells, would be efficacious in treating a diverse array of autoimmune diseases. For example, normal pancreatic islets express MHC class I and have few associated passenger lymphocytes that express both MHC class I and class II molecules (this preparation is referred to herein as B6 splenocytes). In the case of diabetes, a preparation of normal pancreatic islet cells may be injected into a patient to achieve exposure to class I antigen. Although donor cell survival may be short lived, repeated exposure might be sufficient to re-educate the host immune system with concurrent ablation of autoimmune cells. In cases where donor cell preparation is tedious or poor donor cell survival time is limiting the efficacy of the method, class I/peptide complex may be administered directly to the host.
In order to test this hypotheses, diabetic NOD mice were initiated on a 40 day regimen of one bolus injection of CFA to transiently induce TNF-alpha and biweekly exposure by intravenous injection to B6 splenocytes (class I+) (Example 4). As predicted, the injected splenocytes survived only transiently in the host due to rejection. However, transient elimination of autoimmune cells (e.g., via CFA-mediated TNF-alpha induction) combined with repeat exposure to B6 MHC class I and peptide was sufficient for reversal of diabetes in approximately 30% of diabetic NOD hosts. Partial protection was achieved in approximately 50% of the diabetic NOD hosts, but the percentage of host NOD mice remaining normoglycemic increased to 80% after allowing the islets to regenerate for more than 120 days. Furthermore, since the donor B6 splenocytes have a MHC class I phenotype of KbDb and the host NOD mice have a MHC class I phenotype of KdDb, I was able to determine that the now normoglycemic host NOD mice had insulin secreting pancreatic cells of donor B6 origin, based on Kb antibody staining. In addition, to support this finding, I determined that only injection of live, non-irradiated, splenocytes resulted in a contribution of the donor MHC class I phenotype to the host insulin secreting cells.
Blood sugar levels were poorly controlled in mice receiving the injection therapy described above. Fluctuations in blood sugar level could negatively influence benefit of the combined injection therapy. In order to control for this variant, additional groups of diabetic NOD mice were similarly treated with TNF-alpha induction and B6 splenocyte injection, but with simultaneous intraperitoneal implantation of B6 islets encapsulated with alginate (referred to herein as a euglycemic clamp). A euglycemic clamp provides a membrane barrier system that allows short term glycemic control of insulin exchange but prevents direct cell-cell contact (e.g., for T cell education). After 40 days, the encapsulated islets were surgically removed and blood sugar levels of the diabetic NOD mice were monitored for evidence of in situ pancreas regeneration. Remarkably, diabetic NOD mice that had received biweekly B6 splenocyte immunizations and a single dose of TNF-alpha induction therapy remained normoglycemic for 40 days after clamp removal in 78% of the cases. Moreover, after the therapy was halted and autoimmunity eliminated, the continuous expansion of the endogenous pancreas was sufficient for sustained tolerance to self antigens. In contrast, in control experiments, where splenocytes permanently ablated for MHC class I proteins (MHC class I−/−,−/−), poor in situ islet regeneration was observed (Table 3, group 4, FIG. 5). However, injection of splenocytes lacking MHC class II proteins (MHC class II−/−) permitted in situ islet regeneration, presumably due to continued expression of endogenous peptide in the context of MHC class I (Table 3, group 5, FIG. 5). Therefore reestablishment of self tolerance and elimination of autoreactivity was MHC class I dependent.
Therefore, I have identified and optimized a novel combination treatment for diabetes melitus mellitus. Thus, in yet another aspect, the present invention features a method of increasing and preserving the number of functional cells of a predetermined type in a diabetic patient that includes the steps of (1) ablation of autoimmune cells, (2) exposure to MHC class I and peptide, and (3) maintenance of glucose control. As mentioned above, exposure may occur, for example, either by transplantation of functional MHC class I and peptide presenting cells of a predetermined type, or preferably by repeated injection of such cells. Alternatively, exposure to MHC class I and peptide may occur by injection of class I/peptide complexes, peptide feeding of autologous cells etc.
In a particularly preferred embodiment, the present invention provides a method of increasing the number of functional cells of a predetermined type in a diabetic patient that includes the steps of (1) ablation of autoimmune cells (i.e., cells that are defective in cell death), (2) exposure to MHC class I and peptide by repeated injection of functional cells of a predetermined type, expressing peptide in the context of MHC class I (or MHC class I/peptide complex), and (3) maintenance of glucose control. In the case of diabetes, the functional cells of a predetermined type include islet cells, for example, B6 splenocytes. Maintenance of blood glucose levels may be achieve by any means known in the art, for example, insulin injection, or by use of a euglycemic clamp. The diabetic patient can be any mammal, preferably a human patient.
Treatment of Autoimmune Disease
Based on the discoveries described herein, I have devised a novel therapy for the correction of any established autoimmunity. Used in combination, exposure to self peptide in the context of MHC class I and killing or inactivation of autoreactive lymphocyte permits the endogenous regenerative potential of mammalian tissue to be enacted. In addition, the present treatment enables preservation and rescue of existing tissue. The effect of this combination therapy is the re-education of the immune system with the simultaneous reversal of autoimmunity within the host.
With respect to diabetes treatment, I further hypothesize that successfully regenerated pancreatic B6 islet cells that hyper-express MHC class I and peptide (e.g., determined by histological examination) maintain peripheral tolerance once sufficient islet growth has been established. In vivo exposure to MHC class I and peptide expressing cells by transplantation or injection appears to initiate the educational process for long-term and stable tolerance, beyond the period of treatment.
Several striking similarities exist between the NOD mouse and human diabetic patients, suggesting that this novel therapeutic approach can be easily applied to treat human diabetic patients. For example, diabetic human splenocytes, like murine splenocytes, have defects in resistance to TNF-alpha induced apoptosis (Hayashi et al., supra). In addition, like NOD mice, human splenocytes have age related defects in MHC class I presentation of self peptides for proper T cell selection (Faustman et al., supra; Fu et al., J. Clin. Invest. (1993) 91:2301-7). Finally, it has been recognized for years that even after a severe hyperglycemic episode, diabetic humans continue to produce autoantibodies to islet targets, indicating that the islet cells or islet precursor cells of the pancreas were not completely ablated. This indicates that humans diagnosed with diabetic autoimmunity may have high islet regenerative potential.
Thus in one aspect, the invention features a method of increasing the number of functional cells of a predetermined type in an individual diagnosed with an autoimmune disease, by (1) providing a sample of functional cells expressing MHC class I and peptide, (b) exposing a mammal to the MHC class I and peptide, and (c) prior to, after or concurrently with step (b), treating the mammal to kill or inactivate autoimmune cells (i.e., cells defective in apoptosis) in the mammal.
Where the mammal is a diabetic human patient, it may be desirable to add a further step of maintaining normal levels of glucose prior to, after, or concurrently with step (b). As described above, maintenance of normal blood glucose levels in a patient with established diabetes may improve the efficacy of the inventive method.
As mentioned previously, re-education of the immune system with MHC class I and peptide can employ cells expressing endogenous peptide in the context of MHC class I or class I /peptide complexes alone. A number of such immune system re-education methods are known, e.g., as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,538,854, hereby incorporated by reference.
Similarly, a variety of well known methods can be used in the present invention to accomplish ablation of autoimmune cells. One preferred treatment is the administration of TNF-alpha, which is available from Genentech Corporation, South San Francisco, Calif.; Roche; Boehringer Ingelheim; Asahi Chemical Industry; and Sigma Chemicals. The administration intraperitoneally of TNF-alpha to decrease rejection in diabetes-prone mice is described in Rabinovitch et al., J. Autoimmunity (1995) 8(3):357-366, hereby incorporated by reference.
Other host treatment methods can be used as well to ablate autoimmune cells, for example, administration of CFA, interleukin-1 (IL-1), proteasome inhibitors, NFKB inhibitors, anti-inflammatory drugs, tissue plasminogen activator (TPA), lipopolysaccharide, UV light, or an intracellular mediator of the TNF-alpha signaling pathway. Such agents induce the apoptosis of autoreactive lymphocytes by interrupting the pathway downstream from TNF-alpha receptor signaling. Other useful agents are drugs that act downstream of TNF-alpha receptor binding. (Baldwin et al., Ann. Rev. Immunol.(1996) 12:141; Baltimore, Cell (1996) 87:13).
In other aspects, the invention features a method of increasing the number of functional cells of a predetermined type in an individual diagnosed with an autoimmune disease, by (a) providing a sample of cells of the predetermined type, (b) treating the cells to modify the presentation of an antigen of the cells that is capable of causing an in vivo T-lymphocyte-mediated rejection response, (c) introducing the treated cells into the mammal, and (d) prior to, after, or concurrently with step (c), treating the mammal to kill or inactivate T-lymphocytes of the mammal. This method may be particularly useful for the treatment of advanced-stage autoimmune disease, where complete destruction of a particular cell type or tissue has been achieved.
In preferred embodiments, step (b) involves eliminating, reducing or masking the antigen. A number of methods can be used to modify, eliminate, or mask donor cell antigens; some of these are described in the afore-mentioned Faustman U.S. Pat. No. 5,283,058. For example, step (b) may involve genetically altering the donor animal so that HLA class I or a molecule in its pathway is genetically deleted or chaperone ablated to prevent surface expression. Alternatively, step (b) may involve masking HLA class I antigen using an antibody F (ab′)2 fragment that forms a complex with HLA class I.
The therapeutic regimen of the present invention can be used not just to inhibit rejection of regenerating cells, but also to treat autoimmune diseases in which endogenous cell or tissue regeneration is desired, e.g., to allow myelin regeneration (or mere preservation of the remaining autoimmune target cells that are surviving) in multiple sclerosis or joint regeneration in rheumatoid arthritis.
Where the invention is used not just to protect regenerating endogenous cells, e.g., islet cells, from autoimmune attack, but also to protect transplanted cells and tissues, the methods described above can be combined with other, known methods for inhibiting allograft rejection. Such methods include administration of anti-alpha CD3 antibodies, anti-CD40L antibodies (CD40 Ligand, a co-receptor for T cell triggering, to prevent reduction of tolerance in the host), FK506, tacrolimus, sirolimus, alpha-CD25 induction, etc. and cyclosporin A. As is discussed above, autoimmune insulin-dependent diabetes melitus mellitus (IDDM) lymphocytes are particularly sensitive to cell death via the TNF-alpha pathway, and thus drugs that potentiate this pathway downstream of receptor binding can be employed. Examples of such potentiating drugs are targets of TRIP, NIK, I
Even when the primary goal is regeneration or rescue of endogenous cells rather than permanent allograft engraftment, it can be useful to implant an allograft and promote its temporary survival, while simultaneously promoting re-education of the immune system so that the endogenous cells can regenerate; autoreactive lymphocytes are detrimental to both the allograft and the regenerating cells, and therefore killing or inactivation of those cells is doubly advantageous.
Thus, in the case of diabetes, for example, transplanted islets can be temporarily protected from rejection by temporary encapsulation or by meticulous blood sugar control with exogenous insulin, while the host is treated, as described above, to kill autoreactive lymphocytes and the immune system is re-educated by methods using class I and peptide or class II and peptide. An additional advantage of using allogeneic islet transplants during this phase is that normal islets that are temporarily protected might provide normal hormonal and secretory capacities which will optimize in situ regeneration and rescue.
The skilled artisan will appreciate that the present invention can easily be applied to treat any of a variety of autoimmune disorders. Particularly, the present invention is particularly preferred for the treatment autoimmunity where destruction of a particular cell type or tissue is ongoing. The present invention provides the advantage of providing relief to patients with even established cases of autoimmunity, where tissue destruction is advanced or complete. The present invention will now be demonstrated by the following non-limiting examples.
To devise a clinically applicable protocol for the regeneration of islets in a diabetic host, two therapies were combined and tested in the diabetic NOD mouse (a murine model for human type I diabetes). First, donor B6 islets were protected from graft rejection by temporary class I ablation (class−/−) of the β2M gene (Anderson et al., supra; Hyafil et al., supra; Schmidt et al., supra; Bernabeu et al., supra; Li et al., supra). The transgenic donor B6 islets were then removed from the donor mouse and transplanted into the host NOD mouse. Subsequently, a single foot pad injection of CFA was simultaneously administered; a treatment that sustains levels of TNF-alpha for days (Sadelain et al., Diabetes, (1990) 39:583-589; McInerey et al., Diabetes, (1991) 40:715-725; Lapchak et al., Clin. Immunol. Immunopathol. (1992) 65(2):129-134).
The response of severely diabetic NOD female mice to treatments of donor B6 islets with or without transient MHC class I−/− interruption and TNF-alpha induction are summarized in Table 2.
Blood Sugar Control in Diabetic NOD Mice Receiving Islet Transplants
Mean ± SD
4, 6, 6, 8, 10
9 ± 2.3
2, 2, 3, 9, 9, 23
8 ± 8.0
5, 9, 12, 12, 17,
22 ± 24
30, 55, 61, 70,
85 ± 40
72, 121, 136, 137
9, 9, 9, 10, 11
10 ± 0.9
13, 14, 14, 15,
>62 ± 54
25, 32, 32, 32,
36, >133, >133,
>131, >129, >132
11, 12, 13, 14,
35 ± 55
*TNF-alpha induction was accomplished with a single foot pad injection of CFA at the time of the transplant.
†B6-Class I−/− donor islets represent islets with transient class I interruption due to ablation of the donor β2-microglobulin gene (β2M).
††B6-Class I−/−,−/− donor islets with more permanent class I ablation were isolated from mice with both β2M and Tap1 gene interruption, two chaperone proteins essential for class 1 surface expression.
All hosts were female diabetic NOD mice, typically greater than 20 weeks of age, with sustained blood sugar levels in excess of 400 mg/dl for at least 7 days with the administration of insulin of 0.5 U/kg to prevent death. This dose of insulin typically maintains blood sugar levels of NOD mice diabetic in the normal range of 100-200 mg/dl. Eight to twelve hours prior to transplantation, insulin is stopped. All islet transplants are performed unilaterally under the kidney capsule to facilitate post-transplant islet histology using standard techniques.
Typically, NOD islets isolated form 5-10 week old pre-diabetic female NOD mice are rapidly rejected when transplanted into severely diabetic NOD mice (Table 2, group 1). Similarly, B6 islets transplanted under the kidney capsule of diabetic NOD mice are also rapidly rejected with a mean survival time of 8±8.0 (Table 2, Group 2). As published in the literature, although donor islets with MHC class I−/− ablation survive indefinitely in non-autoimmune hosts (Faustman, 1991, supra), the transient MHC class I ablation only permits a three fold increase in islet survival in the challenging diabetic NOD host. All diabetic NOD hosts eventually reject the B6 class I−/− A donor islets; mean survival is extended to 22±24 days (Table 2, group 3). As shown in Table 2, group 4, although TNF-alpha induction facilitates syngeneic islet transplantation in NOD hosts, this autoimmune directed therapy has minimal effect of B6 islet survival. B6 islets transplanted into diabetic NOD mice with TNF-alpha induction are uniformly rejected by day 10 post-transplantation in all diabetic NOD recipients (Table 2, group 5).
As shown in
Importantly, combining MHC class I−/− islet transplantation with TNF-alpha induction in NOD diabetic hosts was successful (Table 2, group 6). Continuous and sustained normoglycemia was observed in 5 of the 14 diabetic NOD hosts; normoglycemia continued beyond 129 days after islet transplantation in the previously diabetic NOD mice receiving the combined treatment. The mean survival time for normoglycemia exceeded 62±54 days. Long-term normoglycemic NOD mice were sacrificed after at least 129 days of post-transplantation monitoring to evaluate the subrenal capsule islet transplantation site and the endogenous pancreas.
Surprisingly, all 5 long-term normoglycemic NOD mice receiving B6 class I−/− islets with TNF-alpha induction treatment histologically demonstrate no surviving islet grafts under the kidney capsule at 130 days post-transplantation. The endogenous pancreas of these mice demonstrated significant islet regeneration (FIG. 3). Furthermore, the islets in the pancreas lacked lymphocyte invasion or, at most, occasionally demonstrated circumferential lymphocytes surrounding the regenerated islets. As the individual animal histology in Table 3 summarizes, in situ pancreas regeneration was exclusively a trait of diabetic NOD mice treated with TNF-alpha in combination with transplantation of donor islets having transient MHC class I−/− interruption. These results demonstrate that the above combination therapy (administration of TNF-alpha and islet cells temporarily ablated for class I (class I−/−)) successfully eliminates existing autoimmunity in severely diabetic NOD mice and promotes regeneration of the endogenous pancreas.
In addition to the elimination of the existing autoimmunity, elimination of TNF-alpha sensitive cells in NOD mice by combined treatment of CFA and C57 lymphocytes or islets was also observed. As the scientific literature reports, incubation of spleen cells from non-autoimmune C57BL/6 mice treated with TNF-alpha (10-20 ng/ml) had no effect on cell viability. In contrast, high numbers of splenocytes from female NOD mice were killed by apoptosis after 12 hours of low dose TNF-alpha exposure. TNF-alpha induced apoptosis in NOD spleen cells from mice 7-15 weeks of age was confirmed using either trypan blue staining or flow cytometry (FIG. 7). Importantly, splenocytes from formerly diabetic NOD mice which received the therapeutic combined treatment of CFA plus class I positive cells were found to have permanent elimination of TNF-alpha sensitive lymphocyte subpopulations (FIG. 7). In vitro treatment of splenocytes from successfully treated NOD mice with TNF-alpha resulted in little or no cell death beyond that seen in the absence of TNF-alpha.
I have also examined the time course of the appearance and the elimination of TNF-alpha sensitive subpopulations. In pre-diabetic NOD mice, which progress to diabetes, splenocytes were found to have high sensitivity to TNF-alpha induced apoptosis beginning after approximately 7 weeks of age. The timing of the onset of this sensitivity was correlated with a lineage/tissue specific decrease in LMP2 protein. Indeed, splenocytes from LMP2−/− mice have TNF-alpha sensitivity al all ages. Yet, only the combined treatment of CFA and MHC class I donor cells permanently eliminated these TNF-alpha autoreactive cells in autoimmune NOD mice.
To further prove that the elimination of the TNF-alpha sensitive sub-population of splenocytes is a key feature of the combined treatment of CFA and MHC class I donor cells, I conducted an adoptive transfer experiment. This was accomplished by testing whether diabetes, from spontaneously diabetic NOD mice, can be transferred to healthy irradiated (790R) syngeneic young male NOD mice. In these experiments, I observed that spleen cells from diabetic NOD mice adaptively transferred diabetes into healthy mice, typically within 20-30 days after an injection of 2×107 splenocytes (FIG. 8). Importantly, when the lymphocytes from diabetic mice were treated in vitro with TNF-alpha at 20 ng/ml for 24 hours prior to transfer, diabetes induction was not observed during the 33 days of observation (FIG. 8). Accordingly, treatment of splenocytes with TNF-alpha in vitro has the ability to selectively kill existing disease-causing cells. Although other cell populations may participate in disease expression, their action is not sufficient to enable expression of diabetes in the absence of the TNF-alpha sensitive population.
Furthermore, in these adoptive transfer experiments, all male NOD mice receiving untreated or TNF-alpha treated diabetic lymphocytes, if still normoglycemic, were killed after the onset of diabetes or at day 35. Male NOD mice receiving the untreated diabetic splenocytes became hyperglycemic during the observation period and had their pancreatic islets obliterated by dense infiltrates. All male NOD mice receiving TNF-alpha treated lymphocytes remained normoglycemic, but had mild to moderate invasive insulitis. This indicated that, while diabetes transfer was delayed, diabetes most likely would occur with lengthened observation times. Therefore, TNF-alpha treatment of diabetic splenocytes delays rapid diabetes transfer but does not permanently eliminate T cells with the latent potential to cause disease in the autoimmune prone host.
Indeed, this experimental result is complementary to the pancreatic histology observed in the NOD mice exhibiting diabetes that were treated with CFA alone and shown in FIG. 1. Active autoimmunity defined by invasive insulitis is never eliminated but is reduced in magnitude by CFA treatment alone. To eliminate autoimmunity permanently, other interventions, such as re-introduction of syngeneic MHC class I expressing cells, as described herein, are required.
In addition, NOD diabetic mice successfully treated with the combination of CFA and MHC class I donor cells no longer have TNF-alpha sensitive lymphocyte subpopulations, indicating that this population of disease-causing cells has been eliminated and continues to be permanently eliminated (FIG. 7). Therefore, not only does the brief in vivo therapy with CFA and cells bearing semi-matched MHC class I peptide complexes eliminate existing autoimmune cells but also the combined therapy established permanent elimination of these disease causing cells. Splenocytes from a successfully treated long-term normoglycemic NOD mice do not transfer diabetes after 100 days of observation and the host pancreatic histology revealed no lymphocytic infiltrates.
To confirm the ability to eliminate existing autoimmunity and regenerate the endogenous pancreas, additional diabetic NOD mice were transplanted with MHC class I−/− islets under the kidney capsule with TNF-alpha induction. At various times post-transplantation, in the presence of sustained induced normoglycemia, islet grafts placed under the kidney were removed by nephrectomy and survival surgery performed to evaluate whether maintenance of normal blood sugar levels was dependent on presence of the graft.
In marked contrast, all NOD mice receiving syngeneic NOD islet cells by transplantation, in conjunction with TNF-alpha induction, rapidly returned to hyperglycemia post-transplantation, demonstrating failure of this transplant protocol using syngeneic NOD islets to promote endogenous pancreatic islet cell regeneration.
In order to begin to dissect the mechanism of systemic reestablishment of tolerance sufficient for pancreatic islet re-growth, additional experiments were performed. In order to achieve a higher success rate of pancreatic islet regeneration with eliminated autoimmunity, a more permanent MHC class I ablated islet was tested in the combination therapy treatment. Islets from B6 donors with both ablated β2M and Tap 1 genes (MHC class I−/−,−/−), the obligatory chaperone and transport proteins for MHC assembly, respectively, were transplanted into severely diabetic NOD mice with TNF-alpha induction. I found that although this approach is effective at prolonging normoglycemia in murine hosts without autoimmunity, this treatment failed to prolong normoglycemia in the autoimmune, diabetic NOD host. More permanent donor MHC class I elimination with TNF-alpha induction in the diabetic NOD host culminated in rapid islet graft rejection and poor ability to achieve endogenous islet regeneration (Table 2, group 7). Apparently, some expression of donor MHC class I and self peptide is essential for NOD tolerance induction to self antigens, even if only for a limited time, on average 20 days (Table 2, group 3) before transplant rejection.
Based on the data of Example 3, above, I proposed that class I+ lymphocyte immunizations could be an efficacious therapy, even if the donor cells only survived a short time in vivo post-injection. In order to test this theory, nine diabetic NOD mice with severe hyperglycemia were initiated on a 40 day regimen of one bolus injection of CFA to transiently induce TNF-alpha and biweekly exposures by intravenous (IV) injection of B6 splenocytes (9×106 splenocytes IV). B6 splenocytes are a lymphoid cell population with intact MHC class I and self peptide presentation that survives only transiently in vivo due to rejection by the host.
Additionally, four diabetic control NOD mice were maintained over the same time period with only insulin treatment. All control NOD mice were monitored every other day for hyperglycemia and insulin was administered daily unless normoglycemia returned. After approximately 40 days of treatment, all control NOD mice receiving only insulin were dead. Poor blood sugar level control, cachexia, and weight loss accounted for the uniform mortality of all diabetic NOD hosts by day 20 (FIG. 4A). Control mice treated only with insulin also had pancreatic histology demonstrating impressive lymphoid infiltrates obscuring any recognizable islet structure (FIG. 4C).
In marked contrast, nine severely diabetic NOD mice receiving repeat exposures to B6 splenocytes plus TNF-alpha induction were alive in eight of nine cases and three of the NOD mice had returned to normoglycemia by day 40. In addition, four diabetic NOD mice treated with repeat B6 splenocyte immunization and TNF-alpha induction, had improved islet histology by day 40 (FIG. 4D). Pancreatic islets were visible and lymphoid infiltrates were significantly reduced circumferentially as well as adjacently to the islet structures. This pattern is characteristic of a histology pattern of protective, not destructive, lymphocyte infiltrates (Gazda et al., Journal of Autoimmunity (1997) 10(3) :261-70; Dilts et al., Journal of Autoimmunity (1999) 12(4) :229-32). Three diabetic NOD mice with TNF-alpha induction and B6 splenocyte immunizations produced complete islet regeneration and insulin independence. Histology on these three mice revealed dramatically reduced lymphocytic autoreactivity and increased islet abundance (FIG. 4D). Therefore, combined treatment with TNF-alpha induction and repeated exposure to peptide-bound B6 MHC class I lymphocytes was sufficient to transiently obliterate autoreactive T cells and reverse NOD diabetes for at least 40 days in approximately 30% of the hosts tested (FIG. 4). The therapy was partially protective in approximately 50% of the NOD hosts (FIG. 4).
In order to eliminate poorly controlled blood sugar levels as a factor hampering more complete islet regeneration, additional groups of diabetic NOD mice were similarly treated, with TNF-alpha induction and B6 splenocyte injection, but with simultaneous implantation of a euglycemic clamp intraperitoneally, for 40 days. A murine euglycemic clamp in these studies consisted of alginate encapsulated B6 islets. The alginate capsule provides a membrane barrier system that allows short term glycemic control of insulin exchange but prevents direct cell-cell contact (e.g., for T cell education). After 40 days, the euglycemic NOD mice with the encapsulated islets underwent surgical removal of the alginate capsules and the blood sugar levels of the diabetic NOD mice were monitored for evidence of in situ pancreas regeneration.
Table 3, shows that after 40 days, both mice treated with the euglycemic clamp in the absence of TNF-alpha induction (Table 3, group 1) and mice treated with the euglycemic clamp and TNF-alpha induction (Table 3, group 2), showed an absence of endogenous islet regeneration and rapidly returned to hyperglycemia after clamp removal. Results indicate that under conditions of excellent glucose control and TNF-alpha induction, apoptosis of existing autoreactive cells is induced during the early phases of acute diabetes, but neither the degenerative state of the pancreas (as assayed by histology) nor the course of preexisting autoimmunity can be altered. The histology of NOD control treatment groups consisted of severe lymphocytic elimination of the islets in the pancreas (Table 3, FIG. 4).
Impact of short-term (40 day) blood sugar control on endogenous islet
regeneration in diabetic NOD mice after removal of euglycemic clamp
# of normoglycemic
Total # of recipients
B6 class I−/−,−/−
C57 class II−/−,+/+
*Euglycemia was maintained for 40 days with an encapsulated islet allograft that was surgically removed on day 40. All the encapsulated grafts were removed on day 40 after transplantation.
¶Another five recipients rejected the encapsulated grafts before removal of the grafts precluding the determination of euglycemia in islet regeneration.
†\C57-class II−/− cells were from disruption of the Abb gene and expresses no A or B MHC class II molecules and were purchased from Taconic Research Laboratories (Germantown, NY).
*TNF-alpha induction was accomplished with a single foot pad injection of CFA at the time of the first spleen cell injection of 9 × 106 cells IV.
†B6-Class I−/−,−/− donor splenocytes were from mice with both β2M and Tap1 gene interruption.
In marked contrast, diabetic NOD mice that had received biweekly B6 splenocyte immunizations in combination with a single dose of TNF-alpha induction therapy remained normoglycemic for 40 days after clamp removal in 78% of the cases. A total of nine diabetic NOD mice were treated with this therapy and seven of the nine NOD mice had pancreatic histology that demonstrated sustained and continuing islet regeneration days to weeks after euglycemic clamp removal (Table 3, FIG. 5). In general, host islets had circumferential lymphocytic accumulations and in some cases were aldehyde fuschin positive, (i.e., had excess insulin, beyond the amount to maintain normoglycemia).
Therefore, islet regeneration was optimized in established diabetic NOD mice by maintenance of blood glucose levels (using a euglycemic clamp), ablation of autoreactive lymphocytes (by brief TNF-alpha induction), and repeated exposure to MHC class I and peptide presenting cells, after a 40 day course of bi-weekly B6 splenocyte injections. Furthermore, after the therapy was halted and autoimmunity eliminated, the immediate rescue and continuous expansion of the endogenous pancreas was sufficient for sustained tolerance to self antigens. The mechanism of splenocyte re-education was defined as dependent upon the education complex of MHC class I and endogenous peptides. As demonstrated in Table 3, injection of splenocytes permanently ablated for MHC class I proteins (MHC class I−/−,−/−) into diabetic NOD mice with euglycemic clamps led to poor in situ islet regeneration (Table 3, group 4, FIG. 5). Injection of splenocytes lacking MHC class II proteins (MHC class II−/−) permitted in situ islet regeneration presumably due to continued expression of endogenous peptide in the context of MHC class I (Table 3, group 5, FIG. 5). Reestablishment of self tolerance and elimination of autoreactivity was MHC class I dependent and MHC class II independent. The sustained effectiveness of this treatment is demonstrated in FIG. 5. Blood sugar maintenance was observed beyond 20 days after the removal of the euglycemic clamp.
Generally, the percentage of CD3+ T cells in young NOD mice (<12 weeks of age) is low, but after 30 weeks of age the percentage of CD3+ T cells increases dramatically and exceeds that of control mice. In order to evaluate the impact of successful pancreas regeneration and rescue on NOD lymphocyte selection, flow cytometric analysis was performed on CD3+ T cells from treated NOD mice.
Splenic CD3+ T cell percentages were evaluated in 5 treated NOD mice receiving various treatments; represented in
TNF-alpha sensitivity, in the NOD mouse, results from signaling defects in the NFKB/proteasome activation pathway, thereby permitting the TNF-alpha combination treatment disclosed herein to be successful. Accordingly, the methods disclosed herein are applicable to any number of mammalian systems. For example, I have shown that TNF-alpha induced apoptosis also occurs in humans. In my studies using fresh human lymphocytes, from patients with diverse autoimmune diseases, use of the combination of CFA and MHC class I donor cells resulted in TNF-alpha induced apoptosis of autoreactive lymphocytes. Lymphocytes from patients with type I diabetes (n=80), multiple sclerosis (n=5), and rheumatoid arthritis (n=10), were treated in vitro with 10-20 ng/ml of TNF-alpha for 24 hours and then evaluated for cell viability. Control lymphocytes from normal human donors were also studied (n=80). In all cases, the control cells were found to be protected from cell death. In contrast, all lymphocytes from autoimmune samples showed varying degrees of cell death after TNF-alpha exposure. These results support the above-described notion that humans with diverse autoimmune diseases, similar to the NOD mice, have intracellular defects in signaling pathways such as NFKB, preventing normal viability after exposure to this cytokine, TNF-alpha. Additional data from this study of humans has revealed that the severity of the autoimmune cell death after TNF-alpha treatment relates to the rate of onset of the disease not to the duration of the disease. This means, for example, that early onset of diabetic autoimmunity in a four-year old child is associated with a greater fraction of lymphocytes dying after TNF-alpha treatment than is observed, following the same treatment, in lymphocytes from a twenty-year old person with onset of autoimmunity in early adulthood. Accordingly, it is likely that more aggressive autoimmune diseases, e.g., ones that appear earlier during a patient's lifetime, show a greater fraction of autoimmune cells susceptible to the treatment for autoimmune disease reversal as is discussed herein.
As detailed above, the therapeutic methods disclosed herein are readily applicable to any number of autoimmune diseases. For example, when a TNF-alpha treatment regimen combined with exposure to MHC class I-self peptide comlexes was applied to other forms of autoimmune disease, such as murine models of Sjogren's disease, lupus symptomatology, and rheumatoid arthritis, I determined that autoimmune infiltrates indicative of Sjogren's disease were eliminated in the salivary and lachrymal glands, autoantibodies indicative of lupus were eliminated, and in a model of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), treatment of female RA mice with the therapy of this application halted limb swelling. The endpoint of a therapy effectiveness was monitored by gross inspection, histology of the target organ, and serology. With respect to RA, after disease onset, nearly 90% of the mice with severe RA were successfully treated and the accompanying joint disease was no longer detectable by gross inspection or by histologic evidence at the time of death.
Treatment Scenario II
Prescreening: A human subject presenting symptoms of type I diabetes will be brought into the clinic to give a single blood donation that will be divided into two tubes. One tube will be used to screen for the presence of autoantibodies and the other tube will be used in an in vitro screen for apoptotic cell death (e.g., TNF-induced) or accelerated cell death due to any environmental or chemical agent. This initial sample will be used to obtain a base line C-peptide level and to verify the absence of functional islets. Heightened in vitro sensitivity to cell death by any apoptotic cell death pathway will be a prerequisite to future therapy.
Treatment of Juvenile Onset Diabetes: If autoantibodies to islet cells are present, we will conclude that the pancreas is still attempting to regenerate. Thus, if existing autoimmunity was eliminated by treatment, the islets could successfully regrow.
An inexpensive approach to try to immediately rescue the pancreas would be to repeatedly perform BCG administrations, as a non-specific immunostimulant that could successfully raise the levels of endogenous TNF-alpha activity. Endogenous TNF-alpha will kill only the autoimmune cells (i.e., cells with a defect in protection from apoptosis). Initially we will start out with weekly BCG immunization. Blood samples will be collected within 24-48 hours after BCG immunization and tested in vitro (in cell culture) for the persistence of TNF-alpha sensitive autoimmune cells. The isolated cells, grown in cell culture, will be examined to determine whether the autoimmune cells, sensitive to death, are eliminated or reduced by this administration.
If the response to BCG immunization is positive, we will then start immunization with donor lymphocytes. Ideally, these lymphocyte immunizations could be from both parents and would involve weekly infusions into the diabetic child, to be administered simultaneously with the BCG immunizations. In some cases, the donor lymphocytes will be irradiated to decrease the risk of infection transfer. We will introduce the lymphocytes intravenously at a dose of approximately 9×106 to 9×109 as a start. With the in vitro monitoring assay, we expect to be able to identify an optimal dose. Our goal is to continue this treatment from a minimum of 40 days up to about 6 months, or until positive human C peptide is found in the blood and insulin dosing is reduced. Early signs of possible tolerance induction success might not only be the presence of C peptide but also the absence of TNF-alpha sensitive (autoreactive) cells. This would be an indication that the re-education is complete. Also, we predict that the phenotype of peripheral lymphoid cells would possibly convert to a more mature phenotype (shown by an decreased CD45RA to CD45RO ratio). Thus, screening in the lab will involve cell death assays and lymphocyte surface markers of improved T cell selection. We expect also to see gross changes, such as reselection of peripheral T cells and gross numbers of CD3 cells decreasing due to reintroduction of lymphoid cells directly, or due to regeneration of islets that re-select peripheral T cells.
Treatment of Adult Onset Diabetes: If the patient is 40 years old and has had diabetes for 20 or more years, we will follow the same treatment protocol, but extend treatment over a longer period of time. In long standing disease, it is possible that the islet precursor cells of the pancreas are effectively inactive and can no longer multiply because of years of autoimmune attack. This treatment might protect the patient from complications of the disease, which in some cases may be directly related to the altered cytokines of the poorly selected lymphoid cells causing fibrosis. In addition, this treatment might eliminate the autoreactive cells that cause fibrosis and other complications. Lastly, this treatment might allow, for the first time, for islets to be transplanted with the barrier being only islet survival, not islet survival from graft rejection or islet survival against autoimmunity.
Treatment Scenario II
Subjects. Patients who are older than age 18 but younger than 45 years and who have Type 1 diabetes (insulin dependent and ketosis prone) will be recruited for this study. Participants will have to have a duration of Type 1 diabetes, dated from the time of insulin administration, of at least one month, but not more than 5 years. The rationale for the duration criterion is predicated on the expectation that persons with less than 5 years duration will still have residual beta cell mass which is capable of recovery. Patients will be screened to determine whether they have autoantibodies (anti-GAD and anti-IA-2 or islet cell antibodies) present. In addition, the presence of functioning beta-cell mass, as measured by detectable (>0.2 pmol/ml) C-peptide levels after glucagon stimulation, will be determined, although it will not be a requirement for inclusion in the study. Exclusion criteria will include persons who have had previous BCG vaccination, a history of clinical tuberculosis, or positive PPD test, a positive response to an intermediate (5 IU) PPD test, or any acute or chronic skin conditions.
Study Procedures: Eligible volunteers, as judged by chart review, will be asked to come to the Diabetes Research Center where they will have measured both fasting and stimulated (6 min after 1 mg glucagon given IV) C-peptide (endogenous insulin) secretion. In addition, blood samples will be obtained to measure autoantibody status (see above) and the level of TNF and autoreactive T-lymphocytes or peripheral lymphoid cells with apoptosis sensitivity. Finally, if no recent (within four weeks) hemoglobin A1c level is available, one will be obtained. A standard panel of liver function tests and a CBC with differential will also be obtained.
TNF-alpha induction, for example, by CFA administration or BCG “vaccination,” will be performed with a standard method with a percutaneous injection of 0.3 ml of a 50 mg/ml solution (Organon)(equivalent to a TNF-alpha induction of 10 μg/m2) into the deltoid area. After the BCG solution is topically applied to the skin, a sterile multipuncture disc is used to administer to BCG percutaneously.
Volunteers will be asked to return at weekly intervals for four weeks to have a blood specimen obtained to repeat measurements of TNF and auto-reactive lymphocytes (1 green top and 1 red top tube). The vaccination site (deltoid area) will be examined on each of these occasions to determine whether any significant ulceration or local reaction has occurred. In addition, patients will be questioned with regard to any febrile or other systemic symptoms that may have occurred. After four weeks, the patients will have a repeat vaccination performed in the opposite arm and similar, weekly monitoring will go on for another two months.
Depending on the results from the first group of 5 subjects, adjustments in dosage and/or frequency of BCG vaccination will be made for a subsequent group of 5 individuals.
Risks: The risks entailed in this study are minor and include the minor discomfort of obtaining blood samples. The total volume of blood obtained over the course of the three-month study will be considerably less than usually given in a single blood donation. The glucagon stimulated C-peptide test is commonly used in experimental protocols. The glucagon injection may be associated with mild nausea which usually dissipates in 5 minutes. Rarely (less than 1 in 20) subjects may vomit after glucagon.
BCG vaccination have been used for more than 30 years in many countries, including Canada and in western Europe, as a vaccination against tuberculosis. The recognized side effects of BCG vaccination include mild local discomfort at the vaccination site with a papular rash developing at the site 10-14 days after vaccination and reaching a maximal diameter of 3 mm 4-6 weeks after vaccination. The rash may scale thereafter, and rarely leaves a visible scar. Local adenopathy is rarely seen in children, but almost never in adults. Rare events include osteomyelitis, lupoid reactions, disseminated BCG infections and death. The frequency of these severe reactions is between 1 in 1,000,000 and 1 in 5,000,000 vaccinations, and have occurred almost exclusively in immunosuppressed children. Most of the recent experience with BCG has been in the intravesicular treatment of bladder cancer, where weekly installations of BCG are performed for ≧6 weeks. Finally, BCG vaccination has been used in Type 1 diabetes without any adverse consequences noted.
All references cited herein are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4309418||Mar 25, 1980||Jan 5, 1982||Sloan-Kettering Research Institute For Cancer||Anti-tumor agent from human serum and process|
|US4457916||Aug 19, 1983||Jul 3, 1984||Asahi Kasei Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha||Method for stabilizing Tumor Necrosis Factor and a stable aqueous solution or powder containing the same|
|US4495282||Jul 21, 1982||Jan 22, 1985||Kabushiki Kaisha Hayashibara Seibutsu Kagaku Kenkyujo||Process for producing target cell lysis factor and uses therewith|
|US4677063||Jul 30, 1985||Jun 30, 1987||Cetus Corporation||Human tumor necrosis factor|
|US4677064||May 2, 1985||Jun 30, 1987||Cetus Corporation||Human tumor necrosis factor|
|US4681760||Apr 17, 1985||Jul 21, 1987||The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University||Method of conferring immunotolerance to a specific antigen|
|US4791101||Jun 20, 1985||Dec 13, 1988||Boehringer Ingelheim||Synergistic mixtures of interferons and tumor necrosis factor|
|US4816567||Apr 8, 1983||Mar 28, 1989||Genentech, Inc.||Recombinant immunoglobin preparations|
|US4879226||Apr 6, 1984||Nov 7, 1989||Asahi Kasei Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha||Novel human physiologically active polypeptide|
|US4963354||Jan 21, 1987||Oct 16, 1990||Genentech, Inc.||Use of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) as an adjuvant|
|US4985241||Aug 25, 1989||Jan 15, 1991||Cetus Corporation||Therapeutic combination of free-radical scavenger and tumor necrosis factor|
|US5002876||Sep 22, 1986||Mar 26, 1991||Phillips Petroleum Company||Yeast production of human tumor necrosis factor|
|US5059530||Sep 5, 1989||Oct 22, 1991||Suntory Ltd.||Expression vector for human TNF|
|US5139481||Aug 7, 1991||Aug 18, 1992||The General Hospital Corporation||Treatment for type II diabetes|
|US5215743||Apr 13, 1988||Jun 1, 1993||Maninder Singh||Tumor necrosis factor formulations|
|US5283058||Mar 19, 1991||Feb 1, 1994||The General Hospital Corporation||Methods for inhibiting rejection of transplanted tissue|
|US5288852||Jul 1, 1993||Feb 22, 1994||Dainippon Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.||Human tumor necrosis factor polypeptides|
|US5487984||Dec 20, 1985||Jan 30, 1996||Biogen, Inc.||Processes for producing tumor necrosis factor|
|US5538854||Jul 14, 1993||Jul 23, 1996||The General Hospital Corporation||Method for the determination of predisposition to autoimmune disease|
|US5560908 *||Jan 19, 1994||Oct 1, 1996||Kanegafuchi Kagaku Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha||Therapeutic agent for NIDDM|
|US5593698||Mar 5, 1993||Jan 14, 1997||Autoimmune, Inc.||Suppression of proliferative response and induction of tolerance with polymorphic class II MHC allopeptides|
|US5783216||Aug 26, 1993||Jul 21, 1998||The General Hospital Corporation||Methods for inhibiting rejection of transplanted tissue|
|US5821337||Aug 21, 1992||Oct 13, 1998||Genentech, Inc.||Immunoglobulin variants|
|US5843425||Jun 5, 1995||Dec 1, 1998||The General Hospital Corporation||Transplantation and graft-versus-host-disease|
|US5843452||Jun 2, 1994||Dec 1, 1998||Pharmagenesis, Inc.||Immunotherapy composition and method|
|US5874306||Dec 12, 1996||Feb 23, 1999||The Regents Of The University Of California||Culturing human pancreatic endocrine cells in medium containing extracellular matrix from human bladder carcinoma cells|
|US5919452 *||Feb 4, 1994||Jul 6, 1999||New York University||Methods of treating TNFα-mediated disease using chimeric anti-TNF antibodies|
|US6046031 *||Jan 20, 1998||Apr 4, 2000||Human Genome Sciences, Inc.||Metalloproteinases|
|US6056952||Aug 29, 1996||May 2, 2000||The United States Of America As Represented By The Department Of Health And Human Services||Selective elimination of T cells that recognize specific preselected targets|
|US6165737||Apr 16, 1998||Dec 26, 2000||The University Of Texas System Board Of Regents||DNA fragmentation factor involved in apoptosis|
|US6284879||Apr 16, 1998||Sep 4, 2001||The General Hospital Corporation||Transport associated protein splice variants|
|US6414218||Jan 18, 2000||Jul 2, 2002||The General Hospital Corporation||Mouse model for rheumatoid arthritis|
|US6420139||Jul 6, 2000||Jul 16, 2002||John Barthelow Classen||Method and composition for an early vaccine to protect against both common infectious diseases and chronic immune mediated disorders or their sequelae|
|US6491908||Nov 4, 1999||Dec 10, 2002||The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Department Of Health And Human Services||Selective elimination of T cells that recognize specific preselected targets|
|US6599710||Mar 8, 2000||Jul 29, 2003||The General Hospital Corporation||Treatment of autoimmune disease|
|US6617171||Feb 27, 1998||Sep 9, 2003||The General Hospital Corporation||Methods for diagnosing and treating autoimmune disease|
|US6660487||Jan 23, 2001||Dec 9, 2003||The General Hospital Corporation||Treatment of autoimmune disease|
|US6773705||Feb 26, 1999||Aug 10, 2004||General Hospital Corporation||Methods for diagnosing and treating autoimmune disease|
|US6844011||Sep 9, 1997||Jan 18, 2005||The General Hospital Corporation||Methods for inhibiting rejection of transplanted tissue|
|US6866843||Dec 6, 2000||Mar 15, 2005||Viacell, Inc.||Method of transplanting in a mammal and treating diabetes mellitus by administering a pseudo-islet like aggregate differentiated from a nestin-positive pancreatic stem cell|
|US6923959||May 2, 2002||Aug 2, 2005||The General Hospital Corporation||Method of pre-inducing a state of immune tolerance before organ transplantation|
|US6984380||May 31, 1995||Jan 10, 2006||Denise L. Faustman||Treatment of diseases involving faulty MHC class I antigen complex presentation|
|US20020106689||Feb 27, 1998||Aug 8, 2002||Denise Faustman||Methods for diagnosing and treating autoimmune disease|
|US20020123472||Jan 23, 2001||Sep 5, 2002||Denise Faustman||Treatment of autoimmune disease|
|US20030005469||Jan 18, 2001||Jan 2, 2003||Faustman Denise L.||Mouse model for rheumatoid arthritis|
|US20030031657||May 2, 2002||Feb 13, 2003||Massachusetts General Hospital||Stem cells and their use in transplantation|
|US20040028658||Feb 5, 2003||Feb 12, 2004||Denise Faustman||Methods of organ regeneration|
|US20040031066||Jan 18, 2001||Feb 12, 2004||Faustman Denise L.||Mouse model for rheumatoid arthritis|
|US20040229785||Nov 14, 2003||Nov 18, 2004||Denise Faustman||Screening methods to identify treatments for autoimmune disease|
|US20050158288||Oct 31, 2003||Jul 21, 2005||Faustman Denise L.||Methods of organ regeneration|
|US20050158302||Feb 10, 2004||Jul 21, 2005||General Hospital Corporation||Methods for diagnosing and treating autoimmune disease|
|US20050244386||Nov 9, 2004||Nov 3, 2005||The General Hospital Corporation||Method of transplanting in a mammal and treating diabetes mellitus by administering a pseudo-islet like aggregate differentiated from a nestin-positive pancreatic stem cell|
|US20060062769||May 19, 2005||Mar 23, 2006||The General Hospital Corporation||Method of pre-inducing a state of immune tolerance before organ transplantation|
|US20070116688||Nov 1, 2004||May 24, 2007||Denise Faustman||Methods of organ regeneration|
|WO1995024914A1||Mar 15, 1995||Sep 21, 1995||Myogenics Inc||Inhibitors of the 26s proteolytic complex and the 20s proteasome contained therein|
|WO1995025533A1||Mar 17, 1995||Sep 28, 1995||Harvard College||PROTEASOME REGULATION OF NF-λB ACTIVITY|
|WO1997008328A1||Aug 29, 1996||Mar 6, 1997||Amy Sonya Rosenberg||Selective elimination of t cells that recognize specific preselected targets|
|WO2000053209A1||Mar 10, 2000||Sep 14, 2000||Gen Hospital Corp||Treatment of autoimmune disease|
|WO2002026819A2||Sep 26, 2001||Apr 4, 2002||Beth Israel Hospital||Recombinant bcg vaccines for the prevention and treatment of cancer|
|1||Aldrich et al., "Positive Selection of Self- and Alloreactive CD8+ T Cells in Tap-1 Mutant Mice," Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:6525-6528 (1994).|
|2||Allen et al., "Effect of Bacillus Calmette-Guerin Vaccination on New-Onset Type 1 Diabetes," Diabetes Care 22:1703-1707 (1999).|
|3||Allson et al., "Hepatocytes from Non-Hepatic Adult Stem Cells," Nature 406:257 (2000).|
|4||*||Altmonte et al. Clinical rheumatology, 1992, vol. 11, p. 202-205.|
|5||Altomonte et al., "Serum Levels of Interleukin-1b, Tumour Necrosis Factor-a and Interleukin-2 in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Correlation with Disease Activity," Clin. Rheumatol. 11:202-205 (1992).|
|6||Anderson et al., "Can Stem Cells Cross Lineage Boundaries?" Nat. Med. 7:393-395 (2001).|
|7||Anderson et al., "Studies on the Cytophillic Properties of Human beta2 Microglobulin," J. Immunol. 114:997-1000 (1975).|
|8||Anderson et al., "Studies on the Cytophillic Properties of Human β2 Microglobulin," J. Immunol. 114:997-1000 (1975).|
|9||Aristarkhov et al., "E2-C, a Cyclin-Selective Ubiquitin Carrier Protein Required for the Destruction of Mitotic Cyclins," Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:4294-4299 (1996).|
|10||Ashton-Rickardt et al., "Evidence for a Differential Avidity Model of T Cell Selection in the Thymus," Cell 76:651-663 (1994).|
|11||Ashton-Rickardt et al., "Peptide Contributes to the Specificity of Positive Selection of CD8+ Cells in the Thymus," Cell 73:1041-1049 (1993).|
|12||Atkinson et al., "The NOD Mouse Model of Type 1 Diabetes: As Good as it Gets?" Nat. Med. 5:601-604 (1999).|
|13||Baeuerie and Baltimore, "NF-kappaB: Ten Years After," Cell 87:13-20 (1996).|
|14||Baeuerie and Baltimore, "NF-κB: Ten Years After," Cell 87:13-20 (1996).|
|15||Baeza et al., "Pancreatic Regenerating Gene Overexpression in the Nonobese Diabetic Mouse During Active Diabetogensis," Diabetes 45:67-70 (1996).|
|16||Baeza et al., "Reg Protein: A Potential Beta-Cell-Specific Growth Factor?" Diabetes Metab. 22:229-234 (1996).|
|17||Baeza et al., "Specific Reg II Gene Overexpression in the Non-Obese Diabetic Mouse Pancreas During Active Diabetogenesis," FEBS Letters 416:364-368 (1997).|
|18||Baik et al., "BCG Vaccine Prevents Insulitis in Low Dose Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Mice," Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice 46:91-97 (1999).|
|19||Baldwin, "The NF-kappaB and IkappaB Proteins: New Discoveries and Insights," Ann. Rev. Immunol. 14:649-683 (1996).|
|20||Baldwin, "The NF-κB and IκB Proteins: New Discoveries and Insights," Ann. Rev. Immunol. 14:649-683 (1996).|
|21||Barres, "A New Role for Glla: Generation of Neurons!" Cell 97:667-670 (1999).|
|22||Baxter et al., "Mycobacteria Precipitate an SLE-Like Syndrome in Diabetes-Prone NOD Mice," Immunology 83:227-231, 1994.|
|23||Beg et al., "An Essential Role for NF-kappaB in Preventing TNFalpha-Induced Cell Death," Science 274:782-784 (1996).|
|24||Beg et al., "An Essential Role for NF-κB in Preventing TNFα-Induced Cell Death," Science 274:782-784 (1996).|
|25||Bendelac et al., "Syngeneic Transfer of Autoimmune Diabetes from Diabetic NOD Mice to Healthy Neonates," J. Exp. Med. 166:823-832 (1987).|
|26||Bernabeu et al., "beta2-Microglobulin from Serum Associates with MHC Class I Antigens on the Surface of Cultured Cells," Nature 308:642-645 (1984).|
|27||Bernabeu et al., "β2-Microglobulin from Serum Associates with MHC Class I Antigens on the Surface of Cultured Cells," Nature 308:642-645 (1984).|
|28||Bill et al., "Use of Soluble MHC Class II/Peptide Multimers to Detect Antigen-Specific T Cells in Human Disease,"0 Arthritis Res. 4:261-265, 2002.|
|29||Bjornson et al., "Turning Brain Into Blood: A Hematopoietic Fate Adopted by Adult Neural Stem Cells In Vitro," Science 283:534-537 (1999).|
|30||Brás et al., "Diabetes-Prone NOD Mice are Resistant to Mycobacterium avium and the infection Prevents Autoimmune Disease," Immunology 89:20-25 (1996).|
|31||Brayer et al., "Alleles from Chromosomes 1 and 3 of NOD Mice Combine to Influence Sjögren's Syndrome-Like Autoimmune Exocrinopathy," J. Rheumatol. 27:1896-1904 (2000).|
|32||Brazelton et al., "From Marrow to Brain: Expression of Neuronal Phenotypes in Adult Mice," Science 290:1775-1779 (2000).|
|33||Brod et al., "Ingested Interferon alpha Suppresses Type I Diabetes in Non-Obese Diabetic Mice," Diabetologia 41: 1227-1232 (1998).|
|34||Brod et al., "Ingested Interferon α Suppresses Type I Diabetes in Non-Obese Diabetic Mice," Diabetologia 41: 1227-1232 (1998).|
|35||Brod et al., "New Clinical Trial in Newly Diagnosed Type 1 Diabetes," Diabetes Station Website Print-Out (2001); date visited Jun. 19, 2001 (http://www.diabetesstation.org/articles/brod.htm).|
|36||Bunting et al., "Enforced P-glycoprotein Pump Function in Murine Bone Marrow Cells Results in Expansion of Side Population Stem Cells In Vitro and Repopulating Cells In Vivo," Blood 96:902-909 (2000).|
|37||Cavallo et al., "BCG Vaccine With and Without Nicotinamide in Recent Onset IDDM: A Multicenter Randomized Trial," Autoimmunity 24(Suppl. 1):A063 (1996).|
|38||*||Chaim et al. PNAS, 1990, vol. 87, p. 968-972.|
|39||Chatenoud et al., "CD3 Antibody-induced Dominant Self Tolerance in Overtly Diabetic NOD Mice," J. Immunol 158:2947-2954 (1997).|
|40||Choi et al., "Prevention of Encephalomyocarditis Virus-Induced Diabetes by Live Recombinant Mycobacterium bovis Bacillus Calmette-Guérin in Susceptible Mice," Diabetes 49:1459-1467 (2000).|
|41||Colucci et al., "Programmed Cell Death in the Pathogenesis of Murine IDDM: Resistance to Apoptosis Induced in Lymphocytes by Cyclophosphamide," J. Autoimmunity 9:271-276 (1996).|
|42||Corbett et al., "Nitric Oxide Mediates Cytokine-Induced Inhibition of Insulin Secretion by Human Islets of Langerthans" Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:1731-1735 (1993).|
|43||Coux et al., "Enzymes Catalyzing Ubiquitination and Proteolytic Processing of the p105 Precursor of Nuclear Factor kappaB1," J. Biol. Chem. 273:8820-8828 (1998).|
|44||Coux et al., "Enzymes Catalyzing Ubiquitination and Proteolytic Processing of the p105 Precursor of Nuclear Factor κB1," J. Biol. Chem. 273:8820-8828 (1998).|
|45||Darzynkiewicz et al., "Use of Flow and Laser Scanning Cytometry to Study Mechanisms Regulating Cell Cycle and Controlling Cell Death," Clinics in Lab. Med. 21:857-873, 2001.|
|46||Dilts et al., "Autoimmune Diabetes: The Involvement of Benign and Malignant Autoimmunity," J. Autoimmun. 12:229-232 (1999).|
|47||Driscoll et al., "The Proteasome (Multicatalytic Protease) is a Component of the 1500-kDa Proteolytic Complex Which Degrades Ubiquitin-Conjugated Proteins," J. Biol. Chem. 265:4789-4792 (1990).|
|48||Eglitis et al., "Hematopoietic Cells Differentiate into Both Microglia and Macroglia in the Brains of Adult Mice," Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:4080-4085 (1997).|
|49||*||Elliot et al. (Diabetes Care, Oct. 1998, p. 1691-1693).|
|50||Elliott et al., "Effect of Bacille Calmette-Guerin Vaccination on C-Peptide Secretion in Children Newly Diagnosed with IDDM," Diabetes Care 21:1691-1693, 1998.|
|51||Eytan et al., "ATP-Dependent Incorporation of 20S Protease into the 26S Complex that Degrades Proteins Conjugated to Ubiquitin," Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86:7751-7755 (1989).|
|52||Fan et al., "Generation of p50 Subunit of NF-kappaB by Processing of p105 Through an ATP-Dependent Pathway," Nature 354:395-398 (1991).|
|53||Fan et al., "Generation of p50 Subunit of NF-κB by Processing of p105 Through an ATP-Dependent Pathway," Nature 354:395-398 (1991).|
|54||Faustman et al., "Abnormal T-Lymphocyte Subsets in Type I Diabetes," Diabetes 38:1462-1468 (1989).|
|55||Faustman et al., "Linkage of Faulty Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I to Autoimmune Diabetes," Science 254:1756-1761 (1991).|
|56||Faustman et al., "Murine Pancreatic beta-Cells Express H-2K and H-2D but not Ia Antigens," J. Exp. Med. 151:1563-1568 (1980).|
|57||Faustman et al., "Prevention of Xenograft Rejection by Masking Donor HLA Class I Antigens," Science 252:1700-1702 (1991).|
|58||Faustman et al., "T-Lymphocyte Changes Linked to Autoantibodies. Association of Insulin Autoantibodies with CD4+CD45R+ Lymphocyte Subpopulation in Prediabetic Subjects," Diabetes 40:590-597 (1991).|
|59||Faustman et al., "Murine Pancreatic β-Cells Express H-2K and H-2D but not Ia Antigens," J. Exp. Med. 151:1563-1568 (1980).|
|60||Feldman et al., "Anti-TNF alpha Therapy is Useful in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Crohn's Disease: Analysis of the Mechanism of Action Predicts Utility in Other Diseases," Transplant. Proc. 30:4126-4127 (1998).|
|61||Feldman et al., "Anti-TNF α Therapy is Useful in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Crohn's Disease: Analysis of the Mechanism of Action Predicts Utility in Other Diseases," Transplant. Proc. 30:4126-4127 (1998).|
|62||Fischer et al., "An Improved Flow Cytometric Assay for the Determination of Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte Activity," J. Immuno. Meth. 259:159-169, 2002.|
|63||Foulis, "C.L. Oakley Lecture (1987). The Pathogenesis of Beta Cell Destruction in Type I (Insulin-Dependent) Diabetes Mellitus," J. Pathol. 152:141-148 (1987).|
|64||Fu et al., "Antigen Processing and Autoimmunity: Evaluation of mRNA Abundance and Function of HLA-Linked Genes," Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 842:138-155 (1998).|
|65||Fu et al., "Defective Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Expression on Lymphoid Cells in Autoimmunity," J. Clin. Invest. 91:2301-2307 (1993).|
|66||Gage et al., "Multipotent Progenitor Cells in the Adult Dentate Gyrus," J. Neurobiol. 36:249-266 (1998).|
|67||Gage, "Mammalian Neural Stem Cells," Science 287:1433-1438 (2000).|
|68||Ganoth et al., "A Multicomponent System that Degrades Proteins Conjugated to Ubiquitin. Resolution of Factors and Evidence for ATP-Dependent Complex Formation," J. Biol. Chem. 263:12412-12419 (1988).|
|69||Gaur et al., "Induction of Islet Allotolerance in Nonhuman Primates," Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 958:199-203 (2002).|
|70||Gazda et al., "Diabetes Results from a Late Change in the Autoimmune Response of NOD Mice," J. Autoimmun. 10:261-270 (1997).|
|71||Gazda et al.,"Regulation of Autoimmune Diabetes: Characteristics of Non-Islet-Antigen Specific Therapies," Immunology and Cell Biology 74:401-407 (1996).|
|72||Ghosh et al., "Activation In Vitro of NF-kappaB by Phosphorylation of its Inhibitor I kappa B," Nature 344:678-682 (1990).|
|73||Ghosh et al., "Activation In Vitro of NF-κB by Phosphorylation of its Inhibitor I κ B," Nature 344:678-682 (1990).|
|74||Glas et al., "The CD8+ T Cell Repertoire in beta2-Microglobulin-Deficient Mice Is Biased towards Reactivity Against Self-Major Histocompatibility Class I," J. Exp. Med. 179:661-672 (1994).|
|75||Glas et al., "The CD8+ T Cell Repertoire in β2-Microglobulin-Deficient Mice Is Biased towards Reactivity Against Self-Major Histocompatibility Class I," J. Exp. Med. 179:661-672 (1994).|
|76||Goldberg, "Functions of the Proteasome: The Lysis at the End of the Tunnel," Science 268:522-523 (1995).|
|77||Graves et al., "Lack of Association Between Early Childhood Immunizations and beta-Cell Autoimmunity," Diabetes Care 22:1694-1967 (1999).|
|78||Graves et al., "Lack of Association Between Early Childhood Immunizations and β-Cell Autoimmunity," Diabetes Care 22:1694-1967 (1999).|
|79||Gronostajski et al., "The ATP Dependence of the Degradation of Short- and Long-lived Proteins in Growing Fibroblasts," J. Bio. Chem. 260:3344-3349 (1985).|
|80||Gueckel et al., "Mutations in the Yeast Proteasome B -Type Subunit Pre3 Uncover Position-Dependent Effects on Proteasomal Peptidase Activity and In Vivo Function," J. Biol. Chem. 273:19443-19452 (1998).|
|81||Haas and Siepmann, "Pathways of Ubiquitin Conjugation," FASEB J. 11:1257-1268 (1997).|
|82||Hao et al., "Effect of Mysophenolate Mofetil on Islet Allografting to Chemically Induced or Spontaneously Diabetic Animals," Transplant. Proc. 24:2843-2844 (1992).|
|83||Harada et al., "Prevention of Overt Diabetes and Insulitis in NOD Mice by a Single BCG Vaccination," Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice 8:85-89 (1990).|
|84||Hartwell et al., "Aberrant Cytokine Regulation in Macrophages from Young Autoimmune-Prone Mice: Evidence that the Intrinsic Defect in MRL Macrophage IL-1 Expression is Transcriptionally Controlled," Mol. Imm. 32: 743-751, 1995.|
|85||Hayashi et al., "Essential Role of Human Leukocyte Antigen-Encoded Proteasome Subunits in NF-kappaB Activation and Prevention of Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha-induced Apoptosis," J. Biol. Chem. 275:5238-5247 (2000).|
|86||Hayashi et al., "NOD Mice are Defective in Proteasome Production and Activation of NF-kappaB," Mol. Cell. Bio. 19:8646-8659 (1999).|
|87||Hayashi et al., "NOD Mice are Defective in Proteasome Production and Activation of NF-kB," Mol. Cell. Biol. 19: 8646-8659, 1999.|
|88||Hayashi et al., "Essential Role of Human Leukocyte Antigen-Encoded Proteasome Subunits in NF-κB Activation and Prevention of Tumor Necrosis Factor-α-induced Apoptosis," J. Biol. Chem. 275:5238-5247 (2000).|
|89||Hayashi et al., "NOD Mice are Defective in Proteasome Production and Activation of NF-κB," Mol. Cell. Bio. 19:8646-8659 (1999).|
|90||Hester et al., "Studies on the Cytophilic Properties of Human alpha2-Microglobulin. II. The Role of Histocompatibility Antigens," Scand. J. Immunol. 9:125-134 (1979).|
|91||Hester et al., "Studies on the Cytophilic Properties of Human α2-Microglobulin. II. The Role of Histocompatibility Antigens," Scand. J. Immunol. 9:125-134 (1979).|
|92||Horsfall et al., "Characterizaton and Specificity of B-Cell Responses in Lupus Induced by Mycobacterium bovis in NOD/Lt mice," Immunology 95:8-17 (1998).|
|93||Horwitz et al., "Recombinant Baccillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) Vaccines Expressing the Mycobacterium tuberculosis 30-kDa Major Secretory Protein Induce Greater Protective Immunity Against Tuberculosis Than Conventional BCG Vaccines in a Highly Susceptible Animal Model," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 97(25):13853-13858 (2000).|
|94||Hsu et al., "TRADD-TRAF2 and TRADD-FADD Interactions Define Two Distinct TNF Receptor 1 Signal Transduction Pathways," Cell 84:299-308 (1996).|
|95||Hyafil and Strominger, "Dissociation and Exchange of the beta2-Micoglobulin Subunit of HLA-A and HLA-B Antigens," Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76:5834-5838 (1979).|
|96||Hyafil and Strominger, "Dissociation and Exchange of the β2-Micoglobulin Subunit of HLA-A and HLA-B Antigens," Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76:5834-5838 (1979).|
|97||Jackson et al., "Hematopoietic Potential of Stem Cells Isolated from Murine Skeletal Muscle," Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:14482-14486 (1999).|
|98||Jacob et al., "Monoclonal Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Antibody Renders Non-Obese Diabetic Mice Hypersensitive to Irradiation and Enhances Insulitis Development," Int. Immunology 4:611-614 (1992).|
|99||Jacob et al., "Prevention of Diabetes in Nonobese Diabetic Mice by Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF): Similarities Between TNF-alpha and Interleukin 1," Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:968-972 (1990).|
|100||Jacob et al., "Prevention of Diabetes in Nonobese Diabetic Mice by Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF): Similarities Between TNF-α and Interleukin 1," Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:968-972 (1990).|
|101||Jacob et al., "Tumour Necrosis Factor-α in Murine Autoimmune ‘Lupus’ Nephritis," Nature 331:356-358 (1988).|
|102||Jakubowski et al., "Phase I Trial of Intramuscularly Administered Tumor Necrosis Factor in Patients with Advanced Cancer," J. Clin. Oncol. 7:298-303 (1989).|
|103||Jiang et al., "Pluripotency of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Derived from Adult Marrow," Nature 418:41-49 (2002).|
|104||Johansson et al., "Identification of a Neural Stem Cell in the Adult Mammalian Central Nervous System," Cell 96:25-34 (1999).|
|105||Juang et al., "Beneficial Influence of Glycemic Control Upon the Growth and Function of Transplanted Islets," Diabetes 43:1334-1339 (1994).|
|106||Kanzler and Dear, "Hox11 Acts Cell Autonomously in Spleen Development and Its Absence Results in Altered Cell Fate of Mesenchymal Spleen Precursors," Devel. Biol. 234:231-243 (2001).|
|107||Kaufman et al., "Patterns of Hemopoietic Reconstitution in Nonobese Diabetic Mice: Dichotomy of Allogeneic Resistance Versus Competitive Advantage of Disease-Resistant Marrow," J. Immunol. 158:2435-2442 (1997).|
|108||*||Kawasaki et al. Diabetes research and clincial practice, 2004, vol. 66, p. 27-32.|
|109||Kawasaki et al., "Prevention of Type 1 Diabetes: from the View Point of β Cell Damage," Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 66:S27-S32 (2004).|
|110||Kieran et al., "The DNA Binding Subunit of NF-κB isIdentical to Factor KBF1 and Homologous to the rel Oncogene Product," Cell 62:1007-1018 (1990).|
|111||Klingensmith et al., "Vaccination with BCG at Diagnosis Does Not Alter the Course of IDDM," Abstract Presented at the 31st Research Symposium on Prevention of Type I Diabetes in General Population. American Diabetes Association, Estes Park, Colorado, 27-29 (1996).|
|112||Koarada et al., "B Cells Lacking RP105, A Novel B Cell Antigen, in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus," Arthritis & Rheumatism 42:2593-2600, 1999.|
|113||Kopp and Ghosh, "Inhibition of NF-κB by Sodium Salicylate and Aspirin," Science 265:956-959 (1994).|
|114||Krause et al., "Multi-Organ, Multi-Lineage Engraftment by a Single Bone Marrow-Derived Stem Cell," Cell 105(3):369-377 (2001).|
|115||Kuehnle and Goodell, "The Therapeutic Potential of Stem Cells from Adults," BMJ 325:372-376 (2002).|
|116||Kwon et al., "Evidence for Involvement of the Proteasome Complex (26S) and NF κB in IL-1β-induced Nitric Oxide and Prostaglandin Production by Rat Islets and RINm5F Cells" Diabetes 47:583-591 (1998).|
|117||Kwon et al., "Interleukin-1β-Induced Nitric Oxide Synthase Expression by Rat Pancreatic β-Cells: Evidence for the Involvement of Nuclear Factor κB in the Signaling Mechanism," Endocrinology 136:4790-4795 (1995).|
|118||Laakko et al., "Versatility of Merocyanine 540 for the Flow Cytometric Detection of Apoptosis in Human and Murine Cells," J. Immuno. Meth. 261:129-139, 2002.|
|119||Lahav-Baratz et al., "Reversible Phosphorylation Controls the Activity of Cyclosome-Associated Cyclin-Ubiquitin Ligase," Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:9303-9307 (1995).|
|120||Lakey et al., "BCG Immunotherapy Prevents Recurrence of Diabetes in Islet Grafts Transplanted into Spontaneously Diabetic NOD Mice," Transplantation 57:1213-1217 (1994).|
|121||Lammert et al., "Induction of Pancreatic Differentiation by Signals from Blood Vessels," Science 294:564-567 (2001).|
|122||Lanza et al., "Transplantation of Encapsulated Canine Islets into Spontaneously Diabetic BB/Wor Rats Without Immunosuppression," Endocrinology 131:637-642 (1992).|
|123||Lapchak et al., "Tumor Necrosis Factor Production is Deficient in Diabetes-Prone BB Rats and Can be Corrected by Complete Freund's Adjuvant: A Possible Immunoregulatory Role of Tumor Necrosis Factor in the Prevention of Diabetes," Clin. Immunol. Immunopathol. 65:129-134 (1992).|
|124||Lawrence et al., "Differential Hepatocyte Toxicity of Recombinant Apo2L/TRAIL Versions," Nat. Med. 7:383-385 (2001).|
|125||Lewis et al., "Integrins Regulate the Apoptotic Response to DNA Damage through Modulation of p53," PNAS 99:3627-3632, 2002.|
|126||Li and Faustman, "Use of Donor β2-Microglobulin-Deficient Transgenic Mouse Liver Cells for Isografts, Allografts, and Xenografts," Transplantation 55:940-946 (1993).|
|127||Li et al., "Abnormal Class I Assembly and Peptide Presentation in the Nonobese Diabetic Mouse," Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:11128-11132 (1994).|
|128||Li et al., "Reduced Expression of Peptide-Loaded HLA Class I Molecules on Multiple Sclerosis Lymphocytes," Ann. Neurol. 38:147-154 (1995).|
|129||Ljunggren et al., "MHC Class I Expression and CD8+ T Cell Development in TAP1/β2-Microglobulin Double Mutant Mice," Int. Immunol. 7:975-984 (1995).|
|130||Macchi et al., "Impaired Apoptosis in Mitogen-Stimulated Lymphocytes of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis," NeuroReport 10:399-402 (1999).|
|131||Mak et al., "Signalling for Survival and Apoptosis in the Immune System," Arthritis Res. 4:S243-S252, 2002.|
|132||Markiewicz et al., "Long-Term T Cell Memory Requires the Surface Expression of Self-Peptide/Major Histocompatibility Complex Molecules," Proc. Natl. Sci. USA 95:3065-3070 (1998).|
|133||Markmann et al., "Indefinite Survival of MHC Class I-Deficient Murine Pancreatic Islet Allografts," Transplantation 54:1085-1089 (1992).|
|134||Marriott BJ, "TNF-α Antagnonists: Monoclonal Antibodies, Soluble Receptors, Thalidomide and Other Novel Approaches," Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 6:1105-1108 (1997).|
|135||*||Marriott, Exp. Opin. Invest. Drugs, 1997, vol. 6, p. 1105-1108.|
|136||Matsumoto et al., "Liver Organogenesis Promoted by Endothelial Cells Prior to Vascular Function," Science 294:559-563 (2001).|
|137||Mayer -Proschel et al., "Isolation of Lineage-Restricted Neuronal Precursors from Multipotent Neuroepithelial Stem Cells," Neuron 19:773-785 (1997).|
|138||McInerney et al., "Prevention of Insulitis and Diabetes Onset by Treatment with Complete Freund's Adjuvant in NOD Mice," Diabetes 40:715-725 (1991).|
|139||McKay et al., "Mammalian Deconstruction for Stem Cell Reconstruction," Nat. Med. 6:747-748 (2000).|
|140||Mercurio et al., "p105 and p98 Precursor Proteins Play an Active Role in NF-κ B-Mediated Signal Transduction," Genes Dev. 7:705-718 (1993).|
|141||Mestas et al., "Of Mice and Not Men: Differences between Mouse and Human Immunology," J. Immunol. 172:2731-2738 (2004).|
|142||Mezey et al., "Turning Blood into Brain: Cells Bearing Neuronal Antigens Generated In Vivo from Bone Marrow," Science 290:1779-1782 (2000).|
|143||Miller et al., "Both the Lyt-2+ and L3T4+ T Cell Subsets are Required for the Transfer of Diabetes in Nonobese Diabetic Mice," J. Immunol. 140:52-58 (1988).|
|144||Mittleman et al., "A Phase I Pharmacokinetic Study of Recombinant Human Necrosis Factor Administered by a 5-Day Continuous Infusion," Invest. New Drugs, 10:183-190 (1992).|
|145||Miyazaki et al., "Predominance of T Lymphocytes in Pancreatic Islets and Spleen of Pre-Diabetic Non-Obese (NOD) Mice: A Longitudinal Study," Clin. Exp. Immunol. 60: 622-630 (1985).|
|146||Morrison, "Stem Cell Potential: Can Anything Make Anything?" Curr. Biol. 11:R7-R9 (2001).|
|147||Nomikos et al., "Combined Treatment with Nicotinamide and Desferrioxamine Prevents Islet Allograft Destruction in NOD Mice," Diabetes 35:1302-1304 (1986).|
|148||Offield et al., "PDX-1 is Required for Pancreatic Outgrowth and Differentiation of the Rostral Duodenum," Development 122:983-995 (1996).|
|149||Ono et al., "IDDM in BB Rats. Enhanced MHC Class I Heavy-Chain Gene Expression in Pancreatic Islets," Diabetes 37:1411-1418 (1988).|
|150||Osorio et al., "Beta-2 Microglobulin Gene Disruption Prolongs Murine Islet Allograft Survival in NOD Mice," Transplant. Proc. 26:752 (1994).|
|151||Palombella et al., "The Ubiquitin-Proteasome Pathway is Required for Processing the NF-κB1 Precursor Protein and the Activation of NF-κ B," Cell 78:773-785 (1994).|
|152||Pestano et al., "Inactivation of Misselected CD8 T Cells by CD8 Gene Methylation and Cell Death," Science 284 : 1187-1191 (1999).|
|153||Petersen et al., "Bone Marrow as a Potential Source of Hepatic Oval Cells," Science 284:1168-1170 (1999).|
|154||Pontesilli et al., "Circulating Lymphocyte Populations and Autoantibodies in Non-Obese Diabetic (NOD) Mice: A Longitudinal Study," Clin. Exp. Immunol. 70:84-93 (1987).|
|155||Pozzilli, "BCG Vaccine in Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus," Lancet 349:1520-1521, 1997.|
|156||Prieto et al., "Apoptotic Rate: A New Indicator for the Quantification of the Incidence of Apoptosis in Cell Cultures," Cytometry 48:185-193, 2002.|
|157||Qin and Singh, "BCG Vaccination Prevents Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus (IDDM) in NOD Mice After Disease Acceleration with Cyclophosphamide," Journal of Autoimmunity 10:271-278 (1997).|
|158||Qin et al., "Complete Freud's Adjuvant-induced T Cells Prevent the Development and Adoptive Transfer of Diabetes in Nonobese Diabetic Mice," J. Immunol. 150:2072-2080 (1993).|
|159||*||Rabinovitch et al. Journal of Immunology, 1997, vol. 159, p. 6298-6303.|
|160||Rabinovitch et al., "TNF-α Down-Regulates Type 1 Cytokines and Prolongs Survival of Syngeneic Islet Grafts in Nonobese Diabetic Mice," J. Immunol 159:6298-6303 (1997).|
|161||Rabinovitch et al., "Tumor Necrosis Factor Mediates the Protective Effect of Freund's Adjuvant Against Autoimmune Diabetes in BB Rats," J. Autoimmunity 8:357-366 (1995).|
|162||*||Rabinovitch J Autoimmunity 1995, vol. 8, p. 357-366.|
|163||*||Rajagopalan et al., PNAS 1990, vol. 87, p. 7020-7024.|
|164||Ramiya et al., "Reversal of Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Using Islets Generated in Vitro from Pancreatic Stem Cells," Nat. Med. 6:278-282 (2000).|
|165||Rietze et al., "Purification of a Plurtpoient Neural Stem Cell from the Adult Mouse Brain," Nature 412:736-739 (2001).|
|166||Ristori et al., "Use of Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) in Multiple Sclerosis," Neurology 53:1588-1589 (1999).|
|167||Roberts et al., "Hox11 Controls the Genesis of the Spleen," Nature 368:747-749 (1994).|
|168||Robertson et al., "Preservation of Insulin mRNA Levels and Insulin Secretion in HIT Cells by Avoidance of Chronic Exposure to High Glucose Concentrations," J. Clin. Invest. 90:320-325 (1992).|
|169||Rolfe et al., "The Ubiquitin-Mediated Proteolytic Pathway as a Therapeutic Area," J. Mol. Med. 75: 5-17, 1997.|
|170||Rosenthal, "Prometheus's Vulture and the Stem-Cell Promise," N. Engl J. Med. 349:267-274 (2003).|
|171||Ryu et al., "Reversal of Established Autoimmune Diabetes by Restoration of Endogeneous β Cell Function," J. Clin. Invest. 108:63-72 (2001).|
|172||Sadelan et al., "Prevention of Type I Diabetes in NOD Mice by Adjuvant Immunotherapy," Diabetes 39:583-589 (1990).|
|173||Sarin et al., "Cytotoxic Effect of TNF and Lymphotoxin on T Lymphoblasts," J. Immunology 151:3716-3718 (1995).|
|174||Satoh et al., "Inhibition of Type I Diabetes in BB Rats with Recombinant Human Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha," J. Immunol. 145:1395-1399 (1990).|
|175||Satoh et al., "Recombinant Human Tumor Necrosis Factor α Suppresses Autoimmune Diabetes in Nonobese Diabetic Mice," J. Clin. Invest. 84:1345-1348 (1989).|
|176||Schatz et al., "Defective Inducer T-Cell Function Before the Onset of Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus," J. Autoimmun. 4:125-136 (1991).|
|177||Schmidt et al., "Interspecies Exchange of β2-Microglobulin and Associated MHC and Differentiation Antigens," Immunogenetics 13:483-491 (1981).|
|178||Sears et al., "NF-κB p105 Processing Via the Ubiquitin-Proteasome Pathway," J. Biol. Chem. 273:1409-1419 (1998).|
|179||*||Serrano et al. Autoimmunity Reviews, 2006, vol. 5, p. 209-214.|
|180||Serrano et al., "Non-HLA Associations with Autoimmune Diseases," Autoimmun. Rev. 5:209-214 (2006).|
|181||Serreze et al., "Th1 to Th2 Cytokine Shifts in Nonobese Diabetic Mice: Sometimes an Outcome, Rather than the Cause, of Diabetes Resistance Elicited by Immunostimulation," The Journal of Immunology 166:1352-1359 (2001).|
|182||Serup et al., "Islet and Stem Cell Transplantation for Treating Diabetes," BMJ 322:29-32 (2001).|
|183||Serup, "Panning for Pancreatic Stem Cells," Nat. Genet. 25:134-135 (2000).|
|184||*||Shahedeh et al. (The Lancet, 1994, vol. 343, p. 706-707).|
|185||*||Shehadeh et al. (Isr J Med Sci. 1997, vol. 33, p. 711-715 in IDS of Jul. 22, 2009.|
|186||Shehadeh et al., "Repeated BCG Vaccination is More Effective than a Single Dose in Preventing Diabetes in Non-Obese Diabetic (NOD) Mice," Israel Journal of Medical Sciences 33:711-715 (1997).|
|187||Shehadeh et al., "Effect of Adjuvant Therapy on Development of Diabetes in Mouse and Man," Lancet 343:706-707 (1994).|
|188||Shihabuddin et al., "Adult Spinal Cord Stem Cells Generate Neurons After Transplantation in the Adult Dentate Gyrus," J. Neurosci. 20:8727-8735 (2000).|
|189||Silva et al., "Prevention of Autoimmune Diabetes Through Immunostimulation with Q Fever Complement-Fixing Antigen," Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1005:423-430, 2003.|
|190||Singh and Elliot, "Can Progression of IDDM be Prevented in Newly Diagnosed Patients by BCG Immunotherapy?" Diabetes/Metabolism Reviews 13(4):320-321 (1997).|
|191||Slack, "Stem Cells in Epithelial Tissues," Science 287:1431-1433 (2000).|
|192||Song et al., "Tumor Necrosis Factor-Related Apoptosis-Inducing Ligant (TRAIL) is an Inhibitor of Autoimmune Inflammation and Cell Cycle Progression," J. Exp. Med. 191:1095-1103 (2000).|
|193||Speiser et al., "Loss of ATP-Dependent Proteolysis with Maturation of Reticulocytes and Erythrocytes," J. Biol. Chem. 257:14122-14127 (1982).|
|194||Sreenan et al., "Increased β-Cell Proliferation and Reduced Mass Before Diabetes Onset in the Nonobese Diabetic Mouse," Diabetes 48:989-996 (1999).|
|195||Stephens et al., "Protection of NIT-1 Pancreatic β-Cells from Immune Attack by Inhibition of NF-κB," J. Autoimmun. 10:293-298 (1997).|
|196||Storms et al., "Hoechst Dye Efflux Reveals a Novel CD7+CD34- Lymphoid Progenitor in Human Umbilical Cord Blood," Blood 96:2125-2133 (2000).|
|197||Sun et al., "MHC Class I Multimers," Arthritis Res. 3:265-269, 2001.|
|198||Szdoray et al., "Programmed Cell Death in Rheumatoid Arthritis Peripheral Blood T-Cell Subpopulations Determined by Laser Scanning Cytometry," Lab. Invest. 83:1839-1848 (2003).|
|199||Tartaglia et al, "The Two Different Receptors for Tumor Necrosis Factor Mediate Distinct Cellular Responses," Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:9292-9296 (1991).|
|200||Terada et al., "Bone Marrow Cells Adopt the Phenotype of Other Cells by Spontaneous Cell Fusion," Nature 416:542-545 (2002).|
|201||Toma et al., "Isolation of Multipotent Adult Stem Cells from the Dermis of Mammalian Skin," Nat. Cell. Bio. 3:778-784 (2001).|
|202||*||Totpal et al. (Journal of Immunology, 1994, vol. 153, p. 2248-2257.|
|203||Townsley et al., "Dominant-Negative Cyclin-Selective Ubiquitin Carrier Protein E2-C/UbcH10 Blocks Cells in Metaphase," Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:2362-2367 (1997).|
|204||Trowsdale et al., "Sequences Encoded in the Class II Region of the MHC Related to the ‘ABC’ Superfamily of Transporters," Nature 348:741-744 (1990).|
|205||Ulaeto et al., "A T-Cell Dormant State in the Autoimmune Process of Nonobese Diabetic Mice Treated with Complete Freund's Adjuvant," Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:3927-3931 (1992).|
|206||Van der Kooy et al., "Why Stem Cells?" Science 287:1439-1441 (2000).|
|207||Van Nocker et al., "The Multiubiquitin-Chain-Binding Protein Mcb1 is a Component of the 26S Proteasome in Saccaromyces cerevisiae and Plays a Nonessential, Substrate-Specific Role in Protein Turnover," Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:6020-6028 (1996).|
|208||Van Noort et al., "Cell Biology of Autoimmune Diseases," Int. Rev. Cytol. 178:127-204 (1998).|
|209||Vidal-Puig and Faustman, "Tolerance to Peripheral Tissue is Transient and Maintained by Tissue-Specific Class I Expression," Transplant. Proc. 26:3314-3316 (1994).|
|210||Vogel et al., "Studies Cast Doubt on Plasticity of Adult Cells," Science 295:1989-1991 (2002).|
|211||Von Herrath et al., "In Vivo Treatment with a MHC Class I-Restricted Blocking Peptide Can Prevent Virus-Induced Autoimmune Diabetes," J. Immunol. 161(9):5087-5096 (1998).|
|212||Von Herrath et al., "In Vivo Treatment with a MHC Class I-Restricted Blocking Peptide Can Prevent Virus-Induced Autoimmune Diabetes," J. Immunol. 161:5087-5096 (1998).|
|213||Wang et al., "Prevention of Recurrence of IDDM in Islet-Transplanted Diabetic NOD Mice by Adjuvant Immunotherapy," Diabetes 41:114-117 (1992).|
|214||Watt et al., "Out of Eden: Stem Cells and Their Niches," Science 287:1427-1430 (2000).|
|215||Waxman et al., "Demonstration of Two Distinct High Molecular Weight Proteases in Rabbit Reticulocytes, One of which Degrades Ubiquitin Conjugates," J. Biol. Chem. 262:2451-2457 (1987).|
|216||Weissman, "Translating Stem and Progenitor Cell Biology to the Clinic: Barrier and Opportunities," Science 287:1442-1446 (2000).|
|217||Weringer et al., "Identification of T Cell Subsets and Class I and Class II Antigen Expression in Islet Grafts and Pancreatic Islets of Diabetic BioBreeding/Worcester Rats," Am. J. Pathol. 132:292-303 (1988).|
|218||Wicker et al., "Transfer of Autoimmune Diabetes Mellitus with Splenocytes from Nonobese Diabetic (NOD) Mice," Diabetes 35:855-860 (1986).|
|219||Willis et al., "Type 1 Diabetes in Insulin-Treated Adult-Onset Diabetic Subjects," Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 42:49-53 (1998).|
|220||Winston, "Embryonic Stem Cell Research: The Case For . . . ," Nat. Med. 7:396-397 (2001).|
|221||Wong et al., "Identification of an MHC Class I-Restricted Autoantigen in Type I Diabetes by Screening an Organ-Specific cDNA Library," Nat. Med. 5:1026-1031 (1999).|
|222||Xu et al., "MHC/Peptide Tetramer-Based Studies of T Cell Function," J. Immuno. Meth. 268:21-28, 2002.|
|223||Yagi et al., "Possible Mechanism of the Preventive Effect of BCG Against Diabetes Mellitus in NOD Mouse. I. Generation of Suppressor Macrophages in Spleen Cells of BCG-Vaccinated Mice," Cellular Immunology 138:130-141 (1991).|
|224||Yagi et al., "Possible Mechanism of the Preventive Effect of BCG Against Diabetes Mellitus in NOD Mouse. II. Suppression of Pathogenesis by Macrophage Transfer from BCG-Vaccinated Mice," Cellular Immunology 138:142-149 (1991).|
|225||Yan et al., "Reduced Expression of Tap 1 and Lmp2 Antigen-Processing Genes in the Nonobese Diabetic (NOD) Mouse Due to a Mutation in Their Shared Bidirectional Promoter," J. Immun. 159: 3068-3080, 1997.|
|226||Yan et al., "Reduced Expression of Tap1 and Lmp2 Antigen-Processing Genes in the Nonobese Diabetic (NOD) Mouse Due to a Mutation in Their Shared Bidirectional Promoter," J. Immunol. 159:3068-3080 (1997).|
|227||Yang et al., "Effect of Tumor Necrosis Factor alpha on Insulin-dependent Diabetes Mellitus in NOD Mice. I. The Early Development of Autoimmunity and the Diabetogenic Process," The Journal of Experimental Medicine 180:995-1004 (1994).|
|228||Yang et al., "Effect of Tumor Necrosis Factor α on Insulin-dependent Diabetes Mellitus in NOD Mice. I. The Early Development of Autoimmunity and the Diabetogenic Process," The Journal of Experimental Medicine 180:995-1004 (1994).|
|229||Ying et al., "Changing Potency by Spontaneous Fusion," Nature 416:545-548 (2002).|
|230||Zöller et al., "Apoptosis Resistance in Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes of Alopecia Areata Patients," J. Autoimmunity 23:241-256 (2004).|
|231||Zulewski et al., "Multipotential Nestin-Positive Stem Cells Isolated from Adult Pancreatic Islets Differentiate Ex Vivo Into Pancreatic Endocrine, Exocrine, and Hepatic Phenotypes," Diabetes 50:521-533 (2001).|
|U.S. Classification||435/7.2, 424/198.1, 435/334, 424/85.1, 435/39, 435/69.5, 435/325|
|International Classification||A61K38/49, A61K39/08, A61K38/19, G01N33/567, C12Q1/06, C12N5/00|
|Cooperative Classification||A61K38/191, A61K38/1774, A61K38/49, A61K38/2006, A61K35/39, A61K39/08|
|European Classification||A61K38/17C, A61K38/19A, A61K39/08|
|Aug 11, 2010||AS||Assignment|
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:FAUSTMAN, DENISE;REEL/FRAME:024825/0325
Effective date: 20100810
Owner name: THE GENERAL HOSPITAL CORPORATION, MASSACHUSETTS
|Jun 9, 2011||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|Mar 12, 2013||CC||Certificate of correction|