Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUSRE41905 E1
Publication typeGrant
Application numberUS 11/924,352
Publication dateNov 2, 2010
Filing dateOct 25, 2007
Priority dateApr 14, 1999
Also published asUS6204798, USRE39038, USRE40653
Publication number11924352, 924352, US RE41905 E1, US RE41905E1, US-E1-RE41905, USRE41905 E1, USRE41905E1
InventorsHoyt A. Fleming, III
Original AssigneeFleming Iii Hoyt A
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Intelligent radar detector
US RE41905 E1
Abstract
A radar detector for alerting an operator of a motor vehicle to an incoming police radar signal. This radar detector includes a microprocessor; a circuit coupled to the microprocessor for detecting the incoming police radar signal; and a global positioning system receiver coupled to the microprocessor. Upon detection of an incoming radar signal, the radar detector can utilize the position, velocity, and/or heading data from the global positioning system receiver to determine whether to generate an alert.
Images(3)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(50)
1. A method, executed by a device having a position, of generating an alert to an incoming radar signal having a frequency and a signal strength, the method comprising the acts of:
(a) detecting the incoming radar signal;
(b) determining the position of the device that detected the incoming radar signal; and
(c) generating an alert if the position of the device is not within a predetermined distance of a predetermined position.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the act of detecting the incoming radar signal includes determining at least one characteristic of the radar signal.
3. The method of claim 2 wherein the act of determining at least one characteristic of the radar signal includes determining the frequency of the radar signal.
4. The method of claim 2 wherein the act of determining at least one characteristic of the radar signal includes determining a frequency bin number.
5. The method of claim 2 wherein the act of determining at least one characteristic of the radar signal includes determining whether the incoming radar signal is in the X frequency band, the Ku frequency band, the K frequency band, or the Ka frequency band.
6. The method of claim 2 wherein the act of determining at least one characteristic of the radar signal includes determining the signal strength of the incoming radar signal.
7. The method of claim 2 wherein the act of generating an alert includes generating an alert if the at least one characteristic is not similar to a predetermined characteristic.
8. The method of claim 1 wherein the act of determining the position of the device includes receiving signals from a plurality of satellites.
9. The method of claim 1 wherein the act of determining the position of the device includes receiving a differential global positioning signal.
10. The method of claim 1 wherein the act of determining the position of the device includes receiving dead reckoning data.
11. A method, executed by a device having a velocity, of generating an alert to an incoming radar signal having a frequency and a signal strength, the method comprising the acts of:
(a) detecting the incoming radar signal;
(b) determining the velocity of the device that detected the incoming radar signal; and
(c) generating an alert if the velocity of the device is greater than a predetermined velocity.
12. The method of claim 11 wherein the act of determining the velocity of the device includes receiving data from a plurality of satellites.
13. The method of claim 11 wherein the act of determining the velocity of the device includes receiving data from a plurality of global positioning satellites.
14. The method of claim 11 wherein the act of determining the velocity of the device includes receiving differential global positioning data.
15. The method of claim 11 wherein the act of determining the velocity of the device includes receiving dead reckoning data.
16. The method of claim 11 wherein the act of generating an alert if the velocity of the device is greater than a predetermined velocity includes generating an alert if the velocity of the device is greater than a velocity that has been previously programmed by an operator of a motor vehicle.
17. The method of claim 11 wherein the act of generating an alert if the velocity of the device is greater than a predetermined velocity includes generating an alert if the velocity of the device is greater than a legal speed limit that is retrieved from a database.
18. A radar detector for alerting an operator of a motor vehicle to an incoming police radar signal comprising:
(a) a microprocessor;
(b) a circuit coupled to the microprocessor for detecting the incoming police radar signal; and
(c) a global positioning system receiver coupled to the microprocessor and operable to provide the microprocessor with data.
19. The radar detector of claim 18, further including a program storage device that is coupled to the microprocessor, the program storage device containing machine readable instructions for:
(a) determining the position of a radar detector; and
(b) generating an alert if the position of the radar detector is not within a predetermined distance of a predetermined position.
20. The radar detector of claim 19, wherein the program storage device includes machine readable instructions for determining at least one characteristic of the radar signal.
21. The radar detector of claim 18, further including a program storage device that is coupled to the microprocessor, the program storage device containing machine readable instructions for:
(a) determining the velocity of the device utilized to detect the incoming radar signal; and
(b) generating an alert if the velocity of a radar detector is greater than a predetermined velocity.
22. A method, performed by a radar detector for alerting an operator of a motor vehicle to an incoming police radar signal, the radar detector having a processor, the method comprising:
receiving first data that is based at least in part upon the incoming police radar signal;
receiving one of a pointing direction of the radar detector and a moving direction of the radar detector; and
alerting the operator of the motor vehicle to the incoming police radar signal;
wherein the receiving first data and the receiving the one of the pointing direction of the radar detector and the moving direction of the radar detector are both performed by the radar detector's processor.
23. The method of claim 22, further comprising generating a visual indication based at least in part upon the one of the pointing direction of the radar detector and the moving direction of the radar detector.
24. The method of claim 23, wherein the one of the pointing direction of the radar detector and the moving direction of the radar detector is determined based at least in part upon data received from a GPS satellite, wherein the radar detector includes non-volatile memory, and wherein the method includes storing a position of the radar detector in the non-volatile memory.
25. The method of claim 24, wherein the radar detector has a velocity, the method further comprising generating an alert if the velocity of the radar detector is greater than a predetermined velocity.
26. The method of claim 24, wherein the radar detector has a velocity, the method further comprising generating an alert if the velocity of the radar detector is greater than a velocity that was programmed by the operator of the radar detector.
27. The method of claim 23, wherein the radar detector includes a database of positions.
28. The method of claim 23, wherein the radar detector includes a database of positions that was provided for a fee.
29. The method of claim 23, wherein the radar detector includes a database of positions that was provided over the Internet.
30. The method of claim 23, wherein the radar detector includes a database of positions that was provided over the Internet for a fee.
31. The method of claim 23, wherein the radar detector has a velocity, the method further comprising generating an alert if the velocity of the radar detector is greater than a predetermined velocity.
32. The method of claim 23, wherein the radar detector has a velocity, the method further comprising muting an alert if the velocity of the radar detector is less than a predetermined velocity.
33. The method of claim 23, wherein the radar detector has a velocity, the method further comprising generating an alert if the velocity of the radar detector is greater than a velocity that was programmed by the operator of the radar detector.
34. The method of claim 23, wherein the radar detector has a velocity, the method further comprising muting an alert if the velocity of the radar detector is less than a velocity that was programmed by the operator of the radar detector.
35. The method of claim 23, wherein the radar detector has a position, the method further comprising generating an alert based at least in part upon the position of the radar detector.
36. The method of claim 22, further comprising generating a sound based at least in part upon the one of the pointing direction of the radar detector and the moving direction of the radar detector.
37. The method of claim 22, wherein the method further includes locating the approximate position of a source of an incoming radar signal.
38. A radar detector for alerting an operator of a motor vehicle to an incoming police radar signal, the radar detector comprising:
an antenna that receives the incoming police radar signal;
an alert circuit that alerts the operator of the motor vehicle to the incoming police radar signal;
a processor, the processor receiving first data that is based at least in part upon the incoming police radar signal, the processor receiving one of a pointing direction of the radar detector and a moving direction of the radar detector; and
a display that generates a visual indication based at least in part upon the one of the pointing direction of the radar detector and the moving direction of the radar detector.
39. The radar detector of claim 38, wherein the one of the pointing direction of the radar detector and the moving direction of the radar detector was determined based at least in part upon data received from a GPS satellite.
40. The radar detector of claim 38, wherein the one of the pointing direction of the radar detector and the moving direction of the radar detector was determined based at least in part upon data received from a GPS satellite and wherein the radar detector includes non-volatile memory that stores a position of the radar detector.
41. The radar detector of claim 38, wherein the radar detector generates a visual indication based at least in part upon a position of the radar detector.
42. The method of claim 38, wherein the radar detector includes a database of positions.
43. The method of claim 38, wherein the radar detector includes a database of positions that was provided for a fee.
44. The method of claim 38, wherein the radar detector includes a database of positions that was provided over the Internet.
45. The method of claim 38, wherein the radar detector includes a database of positions that was provided over the Internet for a fee.
46. The radar detector of claim 38, wherein the radar detector has a velocity and the radar detector generates an alert if the velocity of the radar detector is greater than a predetermined velocity.
47. The radar detector of claim 38, wherein the radar detector has non-volatile memory and a button, and the radar detector stores a position in the non-volatile memory if the operator depresses the button in excess of 1 second.
48. The radar detector of claim 38, wherein the radar detector has a velocity and the radar detector generates an alert if the velocity of the radar detector is greater than a velocity that was programmed by the operator of the radar detector.
49. The radar detector of claim 38, wherein the radar detector includes a database of positions that was provided over the Internet and the radar detector locates the approximate position of a source of an incoming radar signal.
50. The radar detector of claim 38, wherein the radar detector generates a sound based at least in part upon the one of the pointing direction of the radar detector and the moving direction of the radar detector.
Description

This application is a reissue continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/196,841, filed on Aug. 2, 2005, which is a reissue continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/352,679, filed on Jan. 28, 2003, which is a Reissue of U.S. Pat. No. 6,204,798, which issued from U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/292,089, filed on Apr. 14, 1999. More than one reissue application has been filed for the reissue of U.S. Pat. No. 6,204,798. The reissue applications are application Ser. Nos. 10/352,679, 11/196,841, and 11/924,352.

1. BACKGROUND

The present invention relates generally to police radar detectors used in motor vehicles and, more particularly, to police radar detectors that utilize a motor vehicle's position, velocity and/or heading to minimize false alarms.

Many operators of motor vehicles utilize radar detectors to alert them to the fact that their speed is being monitored by law enforcement agencies. However, conventional radar detectors often generate “false alarms.” These false alarms are annoying to the operators of motor vehicles. In fact, various automotive publications publish results of “false alarm” tests. Thus, anything that can be accomplished by the manufacturer to reduce the number of false alarms without reducing detection of police radar is commercially valuable.

In addition to police radar signals, there are many different sources of microwave signals in the frequency bands allocated to police radar by the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC). For example, motion-detecting burglar alarms and automatic door openers also operate in the frequency bands allocated to police radar. Thus, a need exists for a radar detector that can distinguish between signals generated by a police radar transmitter and those generated by other devices which utilize microwave signals within the same frequency bands.

Still another source of annoying false alarms occurs when an operator of a motor vehicle is travelling at a speed that is below the legal speed limit, such as occurs when the operator is in traffic, and the radar detector alerts him to an incoming radar signal. Even if a police radar signal is monitoring the speed of the operator's vehicle, because the velocity of the vehicle is below the legal speed limit, the operator of the vehicle may not need to be alerted to the presence of the police radar signal. Thus, a need exists for a radar detector that does not generate an alert if the velocity of the radar detector is below the legal speed limit.

Operators have become accustomed to radar detectors activating in certain locations along commonly traveled streets and highways. Police radar units may be deployed by the side of the roadway at these locations since the police also are aware of the local activation signals and the police are aware that the signals tend to mask their own speed monitoring radar units. Thus, a need exists for a radar detector that can avoid generating a false alarm due to such accustomed radar signals while still generating an alert for such police radar signals.

2. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

One embodiment is a radar detector for alerting an operator of a motor vehicle to an incoming police radar signal. This radar detector includes a microprocessor; a circuit coupled to the microprocessor for detecting the incoming police radar signal; and a global positioning system receiver coupled to the microprocessor. The radar detector also includes a program storage device containing instructions for determining whether to generate an alert to an incoming radar signal based upon the radar detector's position, velocity, and/or heading.

Another embodiment of the invention is a method of generating an alert to an incoming radar signal. This method includes first detecting the incoming radar signal. Next, the position of a radar detector is determined. Then, an alert is generated if the position of the radar detector is not within a predetermined distance of a predetermined position.

Still another embodiment of the invention is a second method of generating an alert to an incoming radar signal. This method includes first detecting the incoming radar signal. Next, the velocity of the radar detector is determined. Then, an alert is generated if the velocity of a radar detector is greater than a predetermined velocity.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a radar detector including one embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a flow diagram of a method of operating a radar detector.

FIG. 3 is a flow diagram of another method of operating a radar detector.

FIG. 4 is a flow diagram of yet another method of operating a radar detector.

3. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

3.1 Description of a First Embodiment

One embodiment of the novel radar detector is shown in FIG. 1. The radar detector includes an antenna that is coupled to a detector circuit. The detector circuit, which may be controlled by the microprocessor of FIG. 1, collects the signals from the antenna, detects the incoming signals, and distinguishes valid radar signals from electrical noise. The detector circuit may be any appropriate radar detector circuit capable of generating an output signal which indicates the strength, the presence, and/or the frequency of incoming radar signals. While the detector circuit may operate autonomously, operation and control of the detector circuit may be performed by the microprocessor. For example, the microprocessor may control the detector as is known in the art so that radar signals in the different frequency bands allocated to police radar signals are detected. Such detector circuits can take a wide variety of forms and can include amplifiers, mixers, diplexers, and other circuitry commonly used in the radar detector field. Several examples of such circuits are shown in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,313,216, 5,068,663, and 5,250,951, which are incorporated herein by reference.

The output of the detector circuit is coupled to the input of one or more analog-to-digital converters. These converters convert the analog output of the detector circuit into digital signals that represent signal strength, signal presence, and/or signal frequency.

In addition to being coupled to the detector circuit and the analog-to-digital converter, the microprocessor is also coupled to an alert circuit. The alert circuit communicates information regarding detected radar signals to the operator of a motor vehicle using the radar detector by means of one or more alarm tones and/or visual indicators that are included within the alert circuit. Alert circuits are known by those skilled in the art. For example, see U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,313,216, 5,068,663, and 5,250,951, which are incorporated herein by reference.

The microprocessor, which may be any conventional single or multiple chip microprocessor or digital signal processor, is coupled to a program storage device. The program storage device may be any conventional memory device such as a PROM, EPROM, EEPROM, ROM, SRAM or even battery backed up DRAM. The program storage device contains machine readable instructions that command the microprocessor to perform certain functions. For example, the program storage device may be conventionally programmed to sweep a predetermined number of radar frequency bands, determine the frequency and/or signal strength of any detected radar signals in the swept frequency bands, and, if the signal strength of the detected radar signals exceed a predetermined value, then generate a signal that activates the alert circuit. Such programming is known by those skilled in the art. For example, see U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,313,216, 5,068,663, and 5,250,951, which are incorporated herein by reference.

The microprocessor is also coupled to a positioning system such as a global positioning system (“GPS”) receiver. As is well known, a GPS receiver receives signals from satellites and uses these signals to calculate the position of the GPS receiver. In addition, the GPS receiver may receive differential correction data and/or dead reckoning data, such as from a compass or a wheel sensor, to increase the accuracy of the receiver. By calculating the position of the GPS receiver at two different times, the velocity and heading of the GPS receiver can be easily determined using conventional algorithms. Thus, the GPS receiver can provide the microprocessor with data that indicates the position, the velocity, and/or the heading of the radar detector.

The microprocessor may also be coupled to a user interface circuit (not shown). The user interface circuit may include a plurality of buttons that are intended to be depressed by an operator of a motor vehicle. Such buttons may include: a power button, a mute button, a city/highway button, and a dim button.

As will be discussed more fully below, the program storage device may also contain machine readable instructions that command the microprocessor to determine whether to generate an alert based upon data received from the GPS. Thus, upon detection of an incoming radar signal, the radar detector can utilize the position, velocity, and/or heading data from the global positioning system receiver to determine whether to generate an alert.

3.2 Description of a Second Embodiment

One method of operating the radar detector of FIG. 1 is shown in FIG. 2. In this embodiment, the radar detector first detects an incoming radar signal. Next, the position of the radar detector is determined. Then, an alert is generated if the position of the radar detector is not within a predetermined distance of a predetermined position.

By utilizing the above method, many false alarms may be eliminated. For example, if the position of a microwave automatic door opener is programmed into the radar detector and the radar detector detects an incoming radar signal when the radar detector's position is near the automatic door opener, then it is likely that the source of the incoming radar signal is the automatic door opener and not a police radar. Thus, using the method of FIG. 2, an alert would not be generated for the detected radar signal.

The programming of predetermined positions may be accomplished by depressing one or more buttons that are coupled to the interface circuit discussed above. Thus, if an operator of a motor vehicle approaches a microwave automatic door opener, then the operator can depress an “ignore radar” button. Then, the radar detector would store the position of the radar detector and possibly the frequency and the signal strength of the incoming radar signal in the program storage device of FIG. 1 or another memory device (not shown) coupled to or integrated within the microprocessor. An alternative method of storing such data would be to hold down a “mute” button for an extended length of time such as 3 to 5 seconds. It is also possible to experimentally generate a database containing position, frequency and/or signal strength for a specific geographical region. This database could be provided to operators of motor vehicles for a fee. Accessing the Internet via a cellular phone (not shown) coupled to the microprocessor of FIG. 1 would be one method of providing the above database to operators of motor vehicles.

In still another embodiment, when the operator instructs the radar detector to store a position of an incoming radar signal, the radar detector could attempt to locate the approximate position of the source of the incoming radar signal. For example, if an operator instructs the radar detector to store a position of an incoming radar signal as the operator is still approaching the source of the incoming radar signal, the signal strength of the incoming radar signal will be increasing. The radar detector could locate a position that is very near the position of the source of the incoming radar signal by determining the position of the radar detector when the strength of the incoming signal is at a maximum. In addition, radar detectors such as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,250,951, may utilize multiple radar antennas and signal processing logic to more accurately determine the position of the source of the incoming radar signal. For example, the position of the source of many incoming radar signals may be closely approximated by the position of a radar detector when the radar detector identifies that the radar source is to the side of the vehicle.

The predetermined distance may also be programmed by the operator of the motor vehicle. If the GPS receiver is receiving differential correction data or is receiving dead reckoning data, then the predetermined distance may be set to a smaller value because the position of the radar detector may be more precisely determined. In addition, if the strength of the incoming radar is strong, the predetermined distance could be set (manually or automatically) to a higher value because the radar detector will detect the incoming radar signal at a greater distance from the source. For example, if a radar detector in a vehicle detected a radar signal while the vehicle traveled a 1 mile distance, then the predetermined distance for that particular radar signal may be calculated by dividing the 1 mile distance in half. In order to compensate for non-symmetrical detection of the radar signal and inaccuracies of the positioning of the radar detector, an additional ¼ or ½ mile might be added to the above predetermined distance.

3.3 Description of a Third Embodiment

The simple method of operating a radar detector shown in FIG. 2 can be improved as shown in FIG. 3. In this embodiment, the after the radar detects an incoming radar signal it determines a characteristic of the radar signal. For example, the radar detector may determine the frequency and/or the signal strength of the incoming radar signal. Next, the position of the radar detector is determined. Then, an alert is generated if the radar detector is not within a predetermined distance of a predetermined position and the characteristic is not similar to a predetermined characteristic.

By utilizing this method, many false alarms may be eliminated. For example, the location of a microwave automatic door opener and the frequency of the radar signal transmitted by the door opener are first programmed into a radar detector. Assume that a police radar is being transmitted near the location of the microwave automatic door opener. Because the police radar is near the automatic door opener, the method of FIG. 2 would not generate an alert. Thus, the operator of a motor vehicle would not be properly alerted to the police radar. However as shown below, the method of FIG. 3 would generate an alert.

If the automatic door opener signal is processed first according to the method of FIG. 3, then the frequency of the automatic door opener signal would be determined. Next, the position of the radar detector would be determined. Because the radar detector is near the previously programmed position of the automatic door opener and the frequency of the incoming radar signal is equal to the previously programmed frequency of the automatic door opener, the radar detector would not generate an alert.

Next, the police radar signal would be processed. Thus, the frequency of the police radar signal would be determined. However, even though the location of the radar detector is near the previously programmed location of the automatic door opener, because the frequency of the police radar is not equal to the previously programmed frequency of the radar signal transmitted by the door opener, an alert would be generated. Thus, the operator of the motor vehicle would be properly alerted to the presence of the police radar signal.

Due to inaccuracies in algorithms and slight variations in frequencies due to physical phenomena such as temperature of radar transmitters, it may not be practical to determine if a frequency of an incoming radar signal is exactly equal to a previously programmed frequency. Thus, is often sufficient to determine if the frequency of an incoming radar signal is similar to a previously programmed frequency. For example, if two frequencies are within ½, 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 MHz of each other, then they may be considered to be similar.

In one embodiment of the invention, 256 frequency bins are defined for each frequency band of the radar detector. Thus, this one embodiment of the invention, each of the following frequency bands would have 256 bins: X band (10.475-10.575 GHz); Ku band (13.400-13.500 GHz); K band (24.025-24.275 GHz); and Ka band (34.150-35.250 GHz). In this embodiment, frequencies are considered to be similar if they are in the same frequency band and are in the same bin. In still another embodiment, frequencies are considered to be similar if they are in the same frequency band and are in the same or adjacent bins. In these two embodiments, the exact frequency of the incoming radar signal need not be determined. Only the frequency band and the appropriate frequency bin number need be determined. If higher resolution is required, then the number of bins for one or more frequency bands can be increased. On the other hand, if only very low resolution is required, then if two frequencies are in the same frequency band, they may be considered to be similar.

3.4 Description of a Fourth Embodiment

FIG. 4 shows still another method of operating the radar detector of FIG. 1. In this embodiment, the radar signal is first detected. Then, the velocity of the radar detector is determined. Next, an alert is generated if the velocity of the radar detector is greater than a predetermined velocity.

This embodiment is particularly useful if the predetermined velocity is set to a value that is less than the minimum speed limit. For example, if an operator of a motor vehicle programs the predetermined velocity to 65 miles per hour, which may be the speed limit on a particular highway, then the operator will not be alerted to a radar signal unless he is speeding. Thus, the operator will not be alerted to radar signals when he is traveling at a slow rate of speed such as when the operator is in traffic. The operator could also program the predetermined velocity to the minimum speed limit that the operator is likely to encounter in a specific geographical region. For example, if the city in which the operator lives has some streets with a 25 miles per hour speed limit, then the operator could program the predetermined speed to 25 miles per hour. If the operator performed such programming, such as by depressing one or more buttons that are coupled to the interface circuit, the operator could be spared some, but not all false alarms.

A more sophisticated embodiment would not require the user to manually program the speed limit. This embodiment would obtain the speed limit from a database that contains speed limits for particular roads in a geographic region. By comparing the location and/or the heading of a motor vehicle to the location and/or heading of a plurality of roads in the above database, the radar detector could determine the particular road upon which the vehicle is traveling. After such a determination, the speed limit for the particular road could be accessed from the database. Such algorithms are known by those skilled in the art. This database could be stored on the program storage device of FIG. 1 or could be stored on an external storage device such as a CD ROM or a hard disk drive. This database could also be provided to operators of motor vehicles for a fee.

3.5 Other Embodiments

In some cases, an operator of a motor vehicle may desire to be alerted to the presence of a radar signal even if the above methods would not “generate an alert.” In such cases, a less intrusive alert such as a reduced volume tone, and/or a flashing LED could be generated. Thus, the phrase “generate an alert if” a condition occurs is intended to include generating a particular alert if the condition occurs. If another condition occurs, such as detection of an incoming radar signal while the radar detector is within a predetermined distance of a predetermined position as shown in FIG. 2, then another alert may be generated.

The above Description of the Preferred Embodiments includes words, such as “first,” “then,” and “next.” These words indicate a sequence of acts. Many of the sequences can be modified within the scope of the invention. Thus, unless the result of a first act is required for a second act, then the language indicating a sequence should not be considered to be limitations to the invention.

Many of the above embodiments can be combined to produce a radar detector that generates very few false alarms. For example, the methods of FIG. 2 or FIG. 3 can be combined with the method of FIG. 4. Such combinations are intended to be within the scope of the invention.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3660844May 4, 1970May 2, 1972Sierra Research CorpRadar detector and identifier
US4025920 *Sep 28, 1972May 24, 1977Westinghouse Electric CorporationIdentification of radar systems
US4182990May 19, 1978Jan 8, 1980Interstate Electronics Supply, Inc.Radar receiver and method of indicating range to a radar source
US4275399 *Aug 2, 1979Jun 23, 1981Hughes Aircraft CompanyApparatus for determining the direction of arrival of applied energy
US4313216Feb 4, 1981Jan 26, 1982Cincinnati Microwave, Inc.Dual frequency radar receiver
US4315261Jun 3, 1980Feb 9, 1982Controlonics CorporationRadar signal detector
US4581769Jan 31, 1984Apr 8, 1986Cincinnati Microwave, Inc.Radar warning receiver
US4631542Sep 28, 1984Dec 23, 1986Cincinnati Microwave, Inc.Police radar warning receiver with mute function
US4725840Oct 14, 1986Feb 16, 1988Orazietti Vincent AUser carried radar detector
US4750215Jun 24, 1986Jun 7, 1988Cincinnati Microwave, Inc.Police radar signal detection circuitry for a police radar warning receiver
US4817000Mar 10, 1986Mar 28, 1989Si Handling Systems, Inc.Automatic guided vehicle system
US4841302Jan 30, 1987Jun 20, 1989Gray Electronics, Inc.Transmitter detector for use in a moving vehicle
US4887086Jul 28, 1987Dec 12, 1989Trycomm Technologies, Inc.Combination scanner and radar detector
US4906999Apr 7, 1989Mar 6, 1990Harrah David GDetection system for locating aircraft
US4935742Apr 19, 1989Jun 19, 1990Jonathan MarinAutomatic radar generator
US4949088Aug 21, 1989Aug 14, 1990Ryan Thomas MSystem for identifying distance and range between a radar source and a vehicle
US4978963 *Mar 26, 1990Dec 18, 1990Trw Inc.RF signal direction finding apparatus
US5001777 *Sep 12, 1989Mar 19, 1991Liautaud James PUse in motor vehicle
US5049884Oct 10, 1990Sep 17, 1991Cincinnati Microwave, Inc.Battery powered police radar warning receiver
US5068663Jan 24, 1991Nov 26, 1991Valentine Research, Inc.Motor vehicle radar detector including amplitude detection
US5083129Feb 25, 1991Jan 21, 1992Valentine Research, Inc.Police radar detector for detecting radar signals and determining the directional origin of the signal source
US5146226Apr 18, 1991Sep 8, 1992Valentine Research, Inc.Motor vehicle police radar detector for detecting multiple radar sources
US5151701Oct 21, 1991Sep 29, 1992Valentine Research, Inc.Police radar detectors for detecting radar signals and determining the directional origin of the signal source
US5159345Feb 15, 1991Oct 27, 1992Young Wayne KTraffic speed radar unit
US5164729Oct 5, 1990Nov 17, 1992Cincinnati Microwave, Inc.Police radar warning receiver with auto-mute function
US5206500May 28, 1992Apr 27, 1993Cincinnati Microwave, Inc.Pulsed-laser detection with pulse stretcher and noise averaging
US5250951Nov 27, 1992Oct 5, 1993Valentine Research, Inc.Motor vehicle police radar detector for detecting multiple radar sources
US5300932Jul 20, 1993Apr 5, 1994Valentine Research, Inc.Motor vehicle police radar detector for detecting multiple radar sources
US5305007Apr 13, 1993Apr 19, 1994Cincinnati Microwave CorporationWideband radar detector
US5315302Nov 12, 1992May 24, 1994Uniden CorporationRadar detector
US5347120Apr 27, 1993Sep 13, 1994Cincinnati Microwave, Inc.For determining the strength and proximity of a pulsed-laser radar signal
US5365055Apr 27, 1993Nov 15, 1994Cincinnati Microwave, Inc.Test circuit for a pulsed-laser detector
US5485161Nov 21, 1994Jan 16, 1996Trimble Navigation LimitedVehicle speed control based on GPS/MAP matching of posted speeds
US5510793Mar 30, 1995Apr 23, 1996Gregg, Iii; Eugene S.Combined radar detector, speed measuring device and printer for verifying vehicle speed
US5515042Jan 20, 1995May 7, 1996Nelson; LorryMethod of monitoring traffic speed and gathering evidence
US5530447Jan 13, 1995Jun 25, 1996Delco Electronics Corp.Blind-zone target discrimination method and system for road vehicle radar
US5559508Aug 10, 1994Sep 24, 1996Cincinnati Microwave, Inc.Emergency vehicle detector
US5574469Dec 21, 1994Nov 12, 1996Burlington Northern Railroad CompanyLocomotive collision avoidance method and system
US5668554Sep 23, 1996Sep 16, 1997Cincinnati Microwave, Inc.Radar detector display
US5684476May 8, 1995Nov 4, 1997Concord, Inc.Field navigation system
US5812092 *Dec 20, 1996Sep 22, 1998Thomson-CsfRadiocommunications and localizing device
US5835052Aug 14, 1997Nov 10, 1998Uniden CorporationRadar detector and the adjustment system and method thereof
US5900832Sep 12, 1997May 4, 1999Valentine Research, Inc.Input stage for police radar detector including input signal preamplification
US5907293Jul 1, 1996May 25, 1999Sun Microsystems, Inc.Apparatus mounted in a vehicle for avoiding collisions
US5917430Aug 28, 1995Jun 29, 1999The Safety Warning System, L.C.Radar based highway safety warning system
US5917441Sep 12, 1997Jun 29, 1999Valentine Research, Inc.Police radar detector for sweeping K and KA radar bands during one local oscillator sweep
US5977884Jul 1, 1998Nov 2, 1999Ultradata Systems, Inc.Radar detector responsive to vehicle speed
US5990821Jul 7, 1997Nov 23, 1999Whistler Corporation Of MassachusettsDetector apparatus
US6049301Sep 22, 1976Apr 11, 2000The Boeing CompanySurveillance apparatus and method for the detection of radio receivers
US6069580Aug 3, 1998May 30, 2000Bel-Tronics CompanyMulti-conversion radar detector having increased tuning range and self-calibrating function
US6118403Aug 24, 1999Sep 12, 2000Lang; BrookSpeed trap information system
US6175325Nov 15, 1999Jan 16, 2001Yupiteru Industries Co., Ltd.Multi-band microwave detector
US6201493May 28, 1999Mar 13, 2001Lucent Technologies Inc.Radar detector arrangement
US6246948Dec 10, 1998Jun 12, 2001Ericsson Inc.Wireless intelligent vehicle speed control or monitoring system and method
US6252544Jan 25, 1999Jun 26, 2001Steven M. HoffbergMobile communication device
US6285317May 1, 1998Sep 4, 2001Lucent Technologies Inc.Navigation system with three-dimensional display
US6384776Apr 30, 1999May 7, 2002B. Todd MartinEM signal detection and position broadcasting system and method
US6392661Jun 17, 1999May 21, 2002Trident Systems, Inc.Method and apparatus for improving situational awareness using multiple map displays employing peripheral range bands
US6400308Oct 9, 1998Jun 4, 2002Amerigon Inc.High performance vehicle radar system
US6449540Sep 25, 2000Sep 10, 2002I-Witness, Inc.Vehicle operator performance recorder triggered by detection of external waves
US6614385Dec 17, 2001Sep 2, 2003Escort Inc.Police activity transponder utilizing a vehicle interface
US6670905Jun 14, 2000Dec 30, 2003Escort Inc.Radar warning receiver with position and velocity sensitive functions
US6853849May 30, 1996Feb 8, 2005Sun Microsystems, Inc.Location/status-addressed radio/radiotelephone
US20010002451Jan 2, 2001May 31, 2001Breed David S.Method and apparatus for controlling a vehicular component
US20010006372Dec 20, 2000Jul 5, 2001Lemelson Jerome H.Friend or foe detection system and method and expert system military action advisory system and method
US20010012775Mar 2, 2001Aug 9, 2001Motient Services Inc.Network control center for satellite communication system
US20020022927Aug 2, 2001Feb 21, 2002Lemelson Jerome H.GPS vehicle collision avoidance warning and control system and method
US20020133294Nov 6, 2001Sep 19, 2002Farmakis Tom S.Satellite based collision avoidance system
US20030218562Mar 25, 2003Nov 27, 2003Escort Inc.Radar warning receiver with position and velocity sensitive functions
USRE39038Jan 28, 2003Mar 28, 2006Fleming Iii Hoyt AMethod and apparatus for alerting an operator of a motor vehicle to an incoming radar signal
USRE40653Aug 2, 2005Mar 10, 2009Fleming Iii Hoyt ARadar detector for detecting police radar that receives GPS data
DE3411832A1Mar 30, 1984Oct 10, 1985Licentia GmbhRadar warning receiver
FR2776778A1 Title not available
GB843590A Title not available
GB2320384A Title not available
JPH0927096A Title not available
JPH01260386A Title not available
JPH10142330A Title not available
JPS5513887A Title not available
WO1997043651A1May 13, 1997Nov 20, 1997Laser Technology IncCountermeasure circuit for a laser speed detector
WO2000077539A1Jun 14, 2000Dec 21, 2000Escort IncRadar warning receiver with position and velocity sensitive functions
Non-Patent Citations
Reference
1"An Integrated INS/GPS Approach to the Georeferencing of Remotely Sensed Data", Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, vol. 59, No. 11, Nov. 1993, pp. 1667-1674.
2"Buyers Guide: Compass Radar Detectors". [online], [retrieved on May 7, 2007]. Retrieved from the Internet .
3"Radar detectors warn drivers of highway hazards", [online], [retrieved on May 18, 2009]. Retrieved from the Internet .
4"The Electronics Handbook", 1996 pp. 1663-1733.
5"Buyers Guide: Compass Radar Detectors". [online], [retrieved on May 7, 2007]. Retrieved from the Internet <URL: http://www.radarbusters.com/support/buyers-guide/usa/radar_compass.asp>.
6"Radar detectors warn drivers of highway hazards", [online], [retrieved on May 18, 2009]. Retrieved from the Internet <URL: http//americancityandcounty.com/mag/government_radar_detectors_warn/>.
7Answer to Counterclaim, Apr. 7, 2009, in Hoyt A. Fleming v. Tom Coverstone, U.S. District Court Southern District of California, Case3:08-cv-00355-WQH-NLS.
8Complaint, Mar. 10, 2009, in Hoyt A. Fleming v. Escort Inc. and Beltronics USA, U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho, Case1:09-cv-00105-BLM.
9Compliant for Breach Of Contract: Extortion, Feb. 22, 2008, in Hoyt A. Fleming v. Tom Coverstone, U.S. District Court Southern District of California, Case 3:08-cv-00355-WQH-NLS.
10Defendant Tom Coverstone's Answer and Counterclaim To Plaintoff's Second Amended Complaint, Mar. 30, 2009, in Hoyt A. Fleming v. Tom Coverstone, U.S. District Court Southern District of California, Case3:08-cv-00355-WQH-NLS.
11Defendants' Answer to Complaint and Counterclaim, Jun. 22, 2009, in Hoyt A. Fleming v. Escort Inc. and Beltronics USA, Inc., U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho, Case1:09-cv-00105-BLM.
12Defendants' First Amended Answer to Complaint and Counterclaim, Jun. 29, 2009, in Hoyt A. Fleming v. Escort Inc. and Beltronics USA, Inc., U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho, Case1:09-cv-00105-BLM.
13Defendants' Motion for Leave of Court to Amend Defendant's patent Invalidity Contentions, in Hoyt A. Fleming v. Escort Inc. and Beltronics USA, Inc., U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho, Case1:09-cv-00105-BLM.
14Defendants' Motion To Transfer Complaint Pursuant To 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), Apr. 14, 2009, in Hoyt A. Fleming v. Escort Inc. and Beltronics USA, Inc., U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho, Case1:09-cv-00105-BLM.
15Defendants' Opening Claim Construction Brief, in Hoyt A. Fleming v. Escort Inc.and Beltonics USA, Inc., U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho, Case1:09-cv-00105-BLM.
16Defendant's Patent Invalidity Contentions, Jul. 2, 2009, in Hoyt A. Fleming v. Escort Inc. and Beltronics USA, Inc., U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho, Case1:09-cv-00105-BLM.
17Defendants' Reply In Support Of Their Motion To Dismiss Pursuant To Rule 12(b)(6) and Rule 12 (b) (7) May 18, 2009, in Hoyt A. Fleming v. Escort Inc. and Beltronics USA, Inc., U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho, Case1:09-cv-00105-BLM.
18Defendants' Reply In Support Of Their Motion To Transfer Complaint Pursuant To 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) May 18, 2009, in Hoyt A. Fleming v. Escort Inc. and Beltronics USA, Inc., U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho, Case1:09-cv-00105-BLM.
19Defendants' Reply to Plaintiff's Responsive Claim Construction Brief, in Hoyt A. Fleming v. Escort Inc.and Beltronics USA, Inc., U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho, Case1:09-cv-00105-BLM.
20Defendants' Response to Plaintiff's Opening Claim Construction Brief, in Hoyt A. Fleming v. Escort Inc. and Beltronics USA, Inc., U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho, Case1:09-cv-00105-BLM.
21Defendants'Motion To Dismiss, Apr. 14, 2009, in Hoyt A. Fleming v. Escort Inc. and Beltronics USA, Inc., U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho, Case1:09-cv-00105-BLM.
22Deposition transcript of Hoyt Fleming, vol. 1, in Hoyt A. Fleming v. Tom Coverstone, U.S. District Court Southern District of California, Case 3:08-cv-00355-WQH-NLS.
23Deposition transcript of Hoyt Fleming, vol. 2, in Hoyt A. Fleming v. Tom Coverstone, U.S. District Court Southern District of California, Case 3:08-cv-00355-WQH-NLS.
24Dr. Tom J. Chalko, "High accuracy speed measurement using GPS (Global Positioning System)"; Scientific Engineering Research P/L; Mount Best, Victoria, Australia; no date listed; copyright in the year 2007.
25File History for U.S. Appl. No. 10-396-881.
26File History for U.S. Patent No. 6,204,798.
27File History for U.S. Patent No. RE39,038.
28File History for U.S. Patent No. RE40,653.
29First Amended Complaint For Breach Of Contract; Extortion: Defamation, Mar. 12, 2008, in Hoyt A. Fleming v. Tom Coverstone, U.S. District Court Southern District of California, Case 3:08-cv-00355-WQH-NLS.
30Fisher, P. David, "Improving on Police Radar", IEEE Spectrum, Jul. 1992, pp. 38-43.
31Greneker, Gene, "Millimeter Wave Safety Warning System for In-Vehicle Signing", IEEE AES Systems Magazine, Jul. 1998, pp. 7-12.
32Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement, in Hoyt A. Fleming v. Escort Inc.andBeltronics USA, Inc., U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho, Case1:09-cv-00105-BLM.
33Memorandum in Opposition To Defendant's Special Motion To Strike Pursuant To Cal. Code Of Civ. Proc. Section 325.16, Jul. 7, 2008, in Hoyt A. Fleming v. Tom Coverstone, U.S. District Court Southern District of California, Case 3:08-cv-00355-WQH-NLS.
34Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint Pursuant To Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and 12(b)(7), Jun. 18, 2008, in Hoyt A. Fleming v. Tom Coverstone, U.S. District Court Southern District of California, Case3:08-cv-00355-WQH-NLS.
35Notice of Special Motion and Special Motion To Strike Pursuant to Code Of Civil Procedure Section 425.16, Jun. 18, 2008, in Hoyt A. Fleming v. Tom Coverstone, U.S. District Court Southern District of California, Case3 :08-cv-00355-WQH-NLS.
36Order On Motions To: (1) Dismiss, and (2) Transfer, Jun. 11, 2009, in Hoyt A. Fleming v. Escort Inc. and Beltronics USA, Inc., U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho, Case1:09-cv-00105-BLM.
37Order, in Hoyt A. Fleming v. Escort Inc.and Beltronics USA, Inc., U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho, Case1:09-cv-00105-BLM.
38Plaintiff's Opening Claim Construction Brief, in Hoyt A. Fleming v. Escort Inc.and Beltronics USA, Inc., U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho, Case1:09-cv-00105-BLM.
39Plaintiff's Reply Claim Construction Brief, in Hoyt A. Fleming v. Escort Inc.and Beltronics USA, Inc., U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho, Case1:09-cv-00105-BLM.
40Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' Motion to Transfer Filed on Apr. 14, 2009, Apr. 29, 2009, in Hoyt A. Fleming v. Escort Inc. and Beltronics USA, Inc., U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho, Case1:09-cv-00105-BLM.
41Plaintiff's Responsive Claim Construction Brief, in Hoyt A. Fleming v. Escort Inc.and Beltronics USA, Inc., U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho, Case1:09-cv-00105-BLM.
42Plaintoff Hoyt A. Fleming's Response to Defendants' First Set of Interrogatories.
43Plaintoff's Answer to Defendants' First Amended Counterclaims, in Hoyt A. Fleming v. Escort Inc.and Beltronics USA, Inc., U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho, Case1:09-cv-00105-BLM.
44Poteet, David C. "RadioSat". [online], [retrieved on Apr. 10, 2000]. Retrieved from the Internet .
45Poteet, David C. "RadioSat". [online], [retrieved on Apr. 10, 2000]. Retrieved from the Internet <URL: http://newcitymedia.com/radiosat/radiosat/radiosat/index.html>.
46Reply To Plaintoff's Opposition To Defendant's Special Motion To Strike, Jul. 14, 2008, in Hoyt A. Fleming v. Tom Coverstone, U.S. District Court Southern District of California, Case 3:08-cv-00355-WQH-NLS.
47Response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Filed on Apr. 14, 2009, Apr. 29, 2009, in Hoyt A. Fleming v. Escort Inc. and Beltronics USA, Inc., U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho, Case1:09-cv-00105-BLM.
48Smith, Chester L., "Trends in Covert Applications of Electrotechnology", IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, Summer 1991, pp. 15-21.
49Transcript of Proceeding held on Jun. 4, 2009 before Judge Tashima, in Hoyt A. Fleming v. Escort Inc.and Beltronics USA, Inc., U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho, Case1:09-cv-00105-BLM.
50U.S. Appl. No. 60/139,097, filed Jun. 1999, Steven K. Orr.
51U.S. Appl. No. 60/145,394, filed Jul. 1999, Steven K. Orr.
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US8842004Dec 6, 2010Sep 23, 2014Cobra Electronics CorporationAnalyzing data from networked radar detectors
US20140225764 *Sep 7, 2012Aug 14, 2014The Boeing CompanyDisplay of information related to a detected radar signal
Classifications
U.S. Classification342/20, 342/357.22, 342/195, 342/52, 342/89
International ClassificationG01S19/48, G01S19/14, G01S7/40, G01S5/14, G01S7/02
Cooperative ClassificationG01S19/14, G01S7/022
European ClassificationG01S7/02A1
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
Nov 5, 2013B1Reexamination certificate first reexamination
Free format text: THE PATENTABILITY OF CLAIMS 24-26, 32-34, 36, 39, 40, 47 AND 48 IS CONFIRMED; CLAIMS 1-21 WERE PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED; CLAIMS 22, 23, 27-31, 35, 37, 38, 41-46, 49 AND 50 ARE CANCELLED
Feb 19, 2013RRRequest for reexamination filed
Effective date: 20120915