|Publication number||USRE41941 E1|
|Application number||US 12/756,552|
|Publication date||Nov 16, 2010|
|Filing date||Apr 8, 2010|
|Priority date||Aug 31, 2004|
|Also published as||CA2578856A1, CA2578856C, CN101048999A, EP1784964A1, EP1784964B1, US7512714, US20060080451, WO2006026632A1|
|Publication number||12756552, 756552, US RE41941 E1, US RE41941E1, US-E1-RE41941, USRE41941 E1, USRE41941E1|
|Inventors||Richard J. Eckert, Thomas D. Judd|
|Original Assignee||Honeywell International Inc.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (21), Non-Patent Citations (7), Referenced by (5), Classifications (15), Legal Events (3)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
The present invention relates generally to data communication systems. More particularly, the present invention relates to a data communication system for the processing and transmission of Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System (“ACARS”) messages using a TCP/IP network.
ACARS is an addressable digital data communication system utilized by commercial and business aircraft. ACARS was developed to enable flight operators to communicate with the aircraft in their respective fleets. ACARS is used to transmit routine reports, data, and simple messages between an aircraft and its flight operator. ACARS messages are transmitted using AM channels to avoid overcrowding of the aircraft VHF voice channels. Conventional ACARS messaging is described and defined by the ARINC 618 and ARINC 620 standards.
Currently, ACARS messages traverse legacy datalinks that are expensive and relatively slow, such as VHF channels or SATCOM links. Such communication paths are adequate for communications during flight, but can be undesirable for communications after the aircraft has landed. Historically, even after an aircraft has touched down, ACARS messages must be transmitted via existing systems and protocols, which may be provided by private companies such as ARINC (in the United States) and SITA (in Europe). Since most commercial aircraft communication is handled after touchdown, ACARS messaging can be very expensive for airlines, especially for those with very large fleets.
Accordingly, it would be desirable to have an ACARS messaging system that can take advantage of higher speed and less costly data communication systems available to aircraft after touchdown. For example, it would be advantageous for an ACARS messaging system to leverage existing data communication technologies such as the Internet, TCP/IP based communications, and wireless links such as 802.11 links. Furthermore, other desirable features and characteristics of the invention will become apparent from the subsequent detailed description and the appended claims, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and the foregoing technical field and background.
A system for transmitting ACARS messages after touchdown of an aircraft includes onboard processing logic that translates a conventional ACARS message into a format compatible with the TCP/IP suite of protocols. The translation enables the system to transmit ACARS message content using high speed networks, such as the Internet and the LAN architecture maintained by the airline. The translation also facilitates the transmission of ACARS message content in a manner that bypasses the conventional and costly networks maintained by ARINC and SITA.
The above and other aspects of the invention may be carried out in one form by an ACARS messaging method that involves obtaining an ACARS message containing message content, encoding the ACARS message into ASN.1 format, translating the encoded message into an ACARS-IP message (compliant with TCP/IP) containing the message content, and transmitting the ACARS-IP message between an aircraft and a message processing server via a TCP/IP datalink.
A more complete understanding of the present invention may be derived by referring to the detailed description and claims when considered in conjunction with the following figures, wherein like reference numbers refer to similar elements throughout the figures.
The following detailed description is merely exemplary in nature and is not intended to limit the invention or the application and uses of the invention. Furthermore, there is no intention to be bound by any expressed or implied theory presented in the preceding technical field, background, brief summary or the following detailed description.
The invention may be described herein in terms of functional and/or logical block components and various processing steps. It should be appreciated that such block components may be realized by any number of hardware, software, and/or firmware components configured to perform the specified functions. For example, an embodiment of the invention may employ various integrated circuit components, e.g., memory elements, digital signal processing elements, logic elements, look-up tables, or the like, which may carry out a variety of functions under the control of one or more microprocessors or other control devices. In addition, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the present invention may be practiced in conjunction with any number of data transmission protocols and that the system described herein is merely one exemplary application for the invention.
For the sake of brevity, conventional techniques related to ACARS message creation, routing, and processing, TCP/IP data transmission, signaling, network control, and other functional aspects of the systems (and the individual operating components of the systems) may not be described in detail herein. Furthermore, the connecting lines shown in the various figures contained herein are intended to represent example functional relationships and/or physical couplings between the various elements. It should be noted that many alternative or additional functional relationships or physical connections may be present in a practical embodiment.
An ACARS messaging system according to the invention is designed to leverage existing TCP/IP network datalinks that are available to an aircraft, thus enabling the aircraft to communicate ACARS message content to a ground-based peer. Briefly, the invention relates to an application protocol and processing performed by the originator and/or destination subsystems that allow ACARS messages to traverse a TCP/IP network such as the Internet. From a user perspective, ACARS message communications appear to be traversing conventional datalinks even though, in reality, the ACARS message content traverses a low cost and high bandwidth commercial network. Notably, ARINC or SITA need not be involved in ACARS traffic handled by the ACARS messaging system (unlike air-to-ground and ground-to-air transactions over SATCOM/VHF), and the ACARS message content can be transferred directly from the aircraft to a ground end system (and vice versa) over the TCP/IP network without any processing provided by a data service provider.
In practice, TCP/IP network 104 can include any number of physical datalinks interconnected together for purposes of routing TCP/IP traffic from a data source to a data destination. In this regard, the ACARS messaging system may establish a TCP/IP datalink 108 between aircraft 102 and message processing system 106 to facilitate communication of ACARS message content as described in more detail below. To handle a fleet of aircraft, message processing system 106 is configured to support a plurality of TCP/IP connections (one per aircraft). As used herein, a “TCP/IP datalink” is any communication link that can transport data in compliance with the TCP/IP suite of protocols. TCP/IP datalink 108 can include one or more components, including any number of wireless TCP/IP datalinks and any number of wired TCP/IP datalinks.
In the example embodiment, CMU 200 is coupled to TWLU 202 with a suitable datalink, e.g., a 10Base-T Ethernet datalink. TWLU 202, which may also be an LRU, includes hardware and processing logic that supports wireless data communication between aircraft 102 and a ground-based system such as the LAN maintained by the destination airport. In a practical embodiment, TWLU 202 establishes a wireless datalink 204 between aircraft 102 and a wireless access point 206 associated with the ground-based network. In the example embodiment, wireless datalink 204 is a TCP/IP datalink. In practice, wireless datalink 204 can be realized as an 802.11 (a, b, or g) datalink, a Bluetooth datalink, a HomeRF datalink, a HiperLAN datalink, GPRS, wireless telephony, UMTS, SATCOM, or the like. For purposes of the commercial aircraft example described herein, wireless access point 206 can be a ground-based unit located at the destination airport. Wireless access point 206 is connected to TCP/IP network 104, thus establishing TCP/IP datalink 108 between aircraft 102 and message processing server 106.
Referring to CMU 200, ACARS router 302 handles incoming and outgoing ACARS message traffic, including the generation and processing of ACARS messages 304. The configuration and characteristics of conventional ACARS messages are well known to those skilled in the art and, therefore, will not be described in detail herein. Such conventional ACARS messages can include messages that comply with ARINC standards, e.g., A618 messages, A619 messages, and A620 messages. ASN.1 encoder 306 is configured to encode, convert, and/or translate ACARS messages into a format that is compliant with ASN.1. ASN.1 is a formal notation used for describing data transmitted by protocols, regardless of language implementation and physical representation of the data, regardless of the application, and regardless of the complexity of the data. ASN.1 provides an unambiguous methodology for exchanging ACARS content between CMU 200 and message processing server 106. TCP/IP translator 308 functions to translate, convert, and/or format the encoded ACARS messages into corresponding ACARS-IP messages that are compliant with the TCP/IP suite of protocols. The term “ACARS-IP message” is used herein to distinguish such messages from conventional ACARS messages.
As described above, the ACARS-IP messages can be transmitted between the aircraft and message processing server 106 via a suitable TCP/IP datalink, which may include one or more wireless TCP/IP datalinks. Referring to message processing server 106, the ACARS-IP messages are received and processed by TCP/IP translator 310. Translator 310 functions to translate, convert, and/or format the ACARS-IP messages into corresponding data that can be processed by ASN.1 decoder 312. ASN.1 decoder is configured to decode, convert, and/or translate this data to remove the ASN.1 encoding performed by ASN.1 encoder 306. ACARS message construction logic 314 can process the decoded data to construct a received ACARS message having the conventional ACARS format. Thereafter, message content extraction logic 316 can extract any of the useful content from the received ACARS message for further processing or handling in any suitable manner. In lieu of “reconstruction” of the A620 message, the raw data could be fed into any number of processes for appropriate handling.
The example embodiment described herein handles A618, A619, and A620 messages. A618 messages are messages transmitted between aircraft 102 and a ground system such as a data service provider (“DSP”). ACARS messaging system 300 is preferably utilized to transmit A618 messages after touchdown of aircraft 102. Conventional ACARS messaging techniques can be utilized to transmit A618 messages during flight. A619 messages are “internal” messages transmitted between CMU 200 and other LRUs on aircraft 102. A620 messages are messages transmitted between a ground system such as a DSP and an end system (in a practical commercial aircraft deployment, the end system is maintained by the airline).
A conventional ACARS messaging process may be performed as follows. An LRU 402 communicates with A619 protocol handler 412, which generates a suitable A619 message for processing by ACARS router 410. ACARS router 410 then communicates the message to A618 protocol handler 414, which generates a suitable A618 message. The A618 message is then routed to legacy subnetwork(s) 404. In contrast, an ACARS messaging process according to the invention may be performed as follows. The pilot of an aircraft can enter a message (e.g., by typing into a keyboard) into MCDU 408, which is onboard the aircraft. That message is then communicated to ACARS router 410 in a manner that bypasses A619 protocol handler 412. Similarly, messages sent via TCP/IP subnetwork(s) 406 can bypass A618 protocol handler 414 in transit to ACARS router 410. Therefore, the techniques of the invention can be utilized to avoid conventional A619 and A618 ACARS message processing.
Item 2 represents an indication from TWLU 504 to ACARS router 502 that wireless connectivity at a data link layer level has been established. In other words, networking protocols exercising on the TCP/IP network may now exchange data. At this time, ACARS messaging process 600 can establish a TCP/IP datalink between the aircraft and message processing server 506 (task 604). In this regard, Item 3 of the sequence diagram represents an attempt to create a TCP/IP connection with message processing server 506 at the given IP address. In practical embodiments, the first attempt might fail due to routing information being exchanged and/or due to an unstable wireless datalink, however, multiple attempts can be performed to ensure that a stable connection is established.
ACARS messaging process 600 encodes a handshake message into an ASN.1 compliant handshake message (task 606). In practice, the handshake message contains content including at least an aircraft registration number for the aircraft, which enables message processing server 506 to identify the aircraft. Other information that could be contained in the handshake message includes Tail ID, flight number, and any other data that can help message processing server 506 determine the identity of the originating aircraft or CMU. The encoded handshake message can then be translated or otherwise formatted into an ACARS-IP handshake message that is TCP/IP compliant (task 608); the ACARS-IP handshake message will also contain at least the aircraft registration number. Item 4 of the sequence diagram and task 610 of process 600 both represent the transmission of the ACARS-IP handshake message from the CMU to message processing server 506 over the TCP/IP datalink. The intent of this transmission is to establish a communication session between the CMU and message processing server 506.
In response to the handshake message, message processing server 506 can perform a similar procedure to generate and transmit an ACARS-IP return handshake message. In the example embodiment, the ACARS-IP return handshake message contains a unique token/string identifier that identifies message processing server 506. Item 5 of the sequence diagram represents the transmission of the ACARS-IP return handshake message from message processing server 506 to the CMU. Referring to ACARS messaging process 600, if the CMU does not receive a return handshake message (query task 612), then process 600 can exit or transmit another handshake message. If the return handshake message is received, then process 600 continues; the TCP/IP connection can now be utilized to transmit any number of downlink messages and/or any number of uplink messages between the aircraft and the message processing server 506. Uplink and downlink messages can be transmitted concurrently once the TCP/IP connection has been established. Accordingly, process 600 shows separate subprocesses for downlink and uplink message processing.
Regarding downlink messages, process 600 continues and obtains the next ACARS downlink message from a message queue or other source of ACARS messages (task 614). An ACARS messaging system according to the invention can be configured to take advantage of the low cost TCP/IP network as follows. While the aircraft is still in flight or otherwise incapable of establishing a TCP/IP connection as described herein, conventional ACARS downlink messages can be prioritized according to their importance and/or time sensitivity. In this regard, critical messages and messages that cannot be delayed can be processed and transmitted using conventional ACARS messaging techniques. On the other hand, less important messages and messages that need not be delivered immediately can be prioritized and queued for later transmission as one or more ACARS-IP downlink messages. An onboard message queue, which may be realized as a data storage element, can store the messages for subsequent transmission via the TCP/IP datalink after touchdown.
Once the TCP/IP datalink has been established, ACARS router is notified that the TCP/IP subnetwork is ready for use. At this point, ACARS message traffic can occur, including downlink and uplink messages. The sequence diagram shows an example processing of a downlink message, represented by Item 6 (transmitting a suitably formatted ACARS-IP downlink message to message processing server 506 via the TCP/IP datalink).
Referring back to ACARS messaging process 600, an ACARS downlink message containing message content is preferably encoded into an ASN.1 compliant message containing the message content (task 616). In addition, process 600 translates, converts, or otherwise formats the encoded message into an ACARS-IP downlink message containing the message content (task 618). In the practical embodiment, ACARS router 502 processes and encapsulates the ACARS text message and parameters into an ASN.1 protocol data unit (“PDU”) for transmission to message processing server 506 via the TCP/IP datalink (task 620). As mentioned above, the TCP/IP datalink may include one or more wireless datalinks, and task 620 may transmit the ACARS-IP downlink message via the Internet.
The ACARS-IP downlink message is received at message processing server 506 (task 622), which handles the processing of the received message. Briefly, message processing server 506 functions to convert the TCP/IP packets into any suitable format. In one embodiment, message processing server 506 converts the TCP/IP packets into a format that is recognizable by legacy ACARS messaging systems. Alternatively, the raw data could be fed into other processes or systems (e.g., databases, statistical analysis routines, autoresponse systems, email, memory devices, etc.) that utilize different formats. In this regard, ACARS messaging process 600 can perform ASN.1 decoding of the received ACARS-IP message (task 624) and construction of a received ACARS message (task 626). Process 600 may construct the received ACARS message such that it again becomes compliant with the conventional ACARS format. Eventually, process 600 extracts the ACARS message content from the received message (task 628) and/or performs ACARS message handling (task 630) in accordance with the needs and requirements of the system.
The sequence diagram also shows an example processing of an uplink message, represented by Item 7. As mentioned above, a practical embodiment may send uplink and downlink messages at any time, and the timing shown in
For the sake of completeness, ACARS messaging process 600 includes the possibility of concurrent uplink message transmission. Processing of an uplink message may begin by obtaining the next ACARS uplink message from a message queue or from any suitable source associated with message processing server 506 (task 632). Thereafter, process 600 proceeds with encoding the ACARS uplink message into an ASN.1 compliant message (task 634). In addition, process 600 translates, converts, or otherwise formats the encoded message into an ACARS-IP uplink message containing the desired message content (task 636). In the practical embodiment, message processing server 506 creates one or more ASN.1 PDUs during tasks 634 and 636. Thereafter, the ACARS-IP uplink message can be transmitted to the aircraft via the established TCP/IP datalink (task 638).
The ACARS-IP uplink message is eventually received by ACARS router 502, which handles the processing of the received message. Briefly, ACARS router 502 functions to convert the TCP/IP packets into any suitable format. In one embodiment, ACARS router 502 converts the TCP/IP packets into a format that is recognizable by legacy ACARS messaging systems. Alternatively, the raw data could be fed into other processes or systems (e.g., databases, statistical analysis routines, auto-response systems, email, memory devices, etc.) that utilize different formats. In this regard, ACARS messaging process 600 can perform ASN.1 decoding of the received ACARS-IP uplink message (task 640) and construction of a received ACARS uplink message (task 642). Process 600 may construct the received ACARS uplink message such that it again becomes compliant with the conventional ACARS format. Eventually, process 600 extracts the ACARS message content from the received message (task 644) and/or performs ACARS message handling (task 646) in accordance with the needs and requirements of the system. For example, the message, depending upon the destination, may be forwarded to other airborne end systems, such as the flight management system of the aircraft.
After each uplink or downlink message is processed, the next message can be handled as described above. In this regard,
The following is a high level design of an example ACARS messaging application protocol that may be utilized in connection with a practical embodiment of the invention. It should be appreciated that this example reflects only one possible practical implementation of the invention and that the invention is not limited to this specific embodiment or any particular implementation. The system design approach on the CMU is to bypass the conventional ACARS stack and to send the ACARS “user-text” directly to the ground end system. The reason for this approach is to bypass unnecessary ACARS processing (ARINC 618/620), alleviate the need for an ACARS air-ground ACK on a per-message basis (which also alleviates the lock-step limitation of the ACARS protocol), and provide the “user-text” in a format that can be understood by any ground end system. Processing by a data service provider on an ARINC or SITA network is unnecessary with this approach.
The intent is to provide the ground end system with enough information to display the message as if it were received from a data service provider in A620 format (see Table 1 below). The ground end system will be responsible for arranging the data for display in A620 format, or the ground end system may display any or all of the information in any format.
A620 Downlink Message Example—An example A620 ACARS downlink message is set forth below. The intent is to provide the information that a ground end system can use to formulate the A620 message and display exactly as shown. In practice, the CMU will not send the ACARS message shown below verbatim to the ground end system. The example downlink message is formatted as follows:
Decomposition Of Example A620 Message—Table 1 decomposes the example A620 ACARS message and provides an explanation of how all the necessary information may be derived on a ground end system. Column 1, “620 Downlink ACARS Message,” defines the field name in the A620 ACARS message. Column 2, “Origin,” notes where the information may be derived from. “GND” means the ground end system knows this information a priori. “CMU” means this information will be provided by the CMU during the ACARS messaging protocol exchange described herein. “T-CMU” means information will be translated on the ground from information provided by the CMU (through the use of the ACARS messaging protocol exchange described herein). Column 3, “Description,” provides direction for how the information may be populated on the ground. The last column, “Example,” maps the information back to the A620 ACARS message example.
A620 Downlink ACARS Message Fields
will always be QU
Fixed—No DSP has been
Address of Service
used, therefore the
ground system can define
Time ACARS message
Translated on ground
from label and optional
Flight Identifier TEI
Provided by CMU
Provided by CMU
Data Service Provider
Fixed—No DSP has been
used, therefore the
ground system can define
No ground station has
been used, therefore the
ground system can define
This is usually the time
provided by the DSP.
Since no DSP has been
used, the ground system
can determine this item
Provided by CMU
Free Text TEI
Note that the SMI can be determined on the ground end system by mapping the label and sublabel of the ACARS message to the SMI. This mapping is provided in the ARINC 620-4 specification, Appendix C. In addition, the label and sublabel of the ACARS message will be provided by the CMU (via the ACARS messaging protocol exchange described above).
A620 Downlink Messaging Protocol—The following is a high level composition of PDUs that can be generated by the CMU and sent to the ground.
Aircraft Registration Number
Message Sequence Number
Text (“Text” field from Table 1)
In a practical embodiment, an acknowledgement (“ACK”) PDU sent by the CMU for every PDU received from the ground is not necessary due to a reliable transport system (i.e., the TCP/IP connection).
A618 Uplink Message Example—An example of a partial A618 uplink message is set forth below. This message contains all parts after the conventional ACARS message “STX” field. As described above, the ACARS stack in the CMU is bypassed, which eliminates the need for a complete A618 header in the ACARS message. Nonetheless, issues might surface when other end systems (e.g., LRUs such as printers or the flight management system) on the aircraft expect a formatted header. Hence, it is the responsibility of the ground end system to populate the header as described in Table 4 (see below) prior to sending the ACARS message to the CMU. This header is not always necessary, and can be determined via reference to ARINC Specification 620-4, Appendix C per a label and sublabel basis. Therefore, in certain instances, it is expected that the ground will provide only the user-text as the ACARS message, and in other instances a partial A618 header will be appended to the user-text of the ACARS message. The example uplink message is formatted as follows:
Decomposition Of Example A618 Message—Table 4 provides a decomposition of a partial A618 ACARS message with an optional populated header and an optional sublabel. Column 1, “Uplink ACARS Message Field,” defines the field name in the ACARS message. Column 2, “Description,” provides direction on how the information may be populated on the ground and whether such information is optional. The last column, “Example,” maps the information back to the A618 ACARS message example. The CMU is expecting the ACARS message to be in this format.
A620 Uplink ACARS Message Fields
Should include ground station origin name
Time ACARS message was sent from
message processing server (optional
This field is used to determine the label
and optional sublabel in the Uplink-
ACARS-MSG PDU (optional header)
Fixed (optional header)
Aircraft destination (optional header)
Fixed (optional header)
Message payload to CMU
A618 Uplink Messaging Protocol—The following is a high level composition of PDUs that can be generated by the ground end system and sent to the CMU on the aircraft.
Unique name of ground host
Text (All fields from Table 4)
In a practical embodiment, an ACK PDU sent by the ground end system for every PDU received from the CMU is not necessary due to a reliable transport system (i.e., the TCP/IP connection).
As mentioned above, ASN.1 is a formal notation used for describing data transmitted by protocols, regardless of language implementation and physical representation of the data. A practical advantage of using ASN.1 is the existence of freeware ASN.1 compilers. ASN.1 compilers convert ASN.1 text into C source code. The generated C code contains equivalent data structures and routines to convert values between the internal (C source code) representation and the corresponding Basic Encoding Rules format used to transmit data to a peer.
TCP is a stream oriented protocol, which means that there is no embedded distinction between the end of one PDU and the start of the next. Therefore, the given application must decipher the PDUs from the received octet stream. An ASN.1 encoded octet stream provides the distinction between PDUs by providing a size field in the first few octets of the stream. Thus, when reading an ASN.1 encoded PDU from a TCP/IP socket, the application must process the first few bytes to interpret the total size of the packet, then read the complete PDU prior to complete interpretation.
The following is ASN.1 text that describes one example ACARS messaging protocol as set forth above. The ASN.1 notation for a practical application will vary depending upon the data to exchange, new application protocols to support, and other implementation specific details.
ACARSOverInternetProtocol DEFINITIONS ::=
-- Basic types for AOIP protocol
 PrintableString( SIZE( 7 ) )
 BIT STRING( SIZE( 24 ) )
 PrintableString( SIZE( 6 ) )
 PrintableString( SIZE( 4 ) )
 NumericString( SIZE( 6 ) )
 VisibleString( SIZE( 2 ) )
 PrintableString( SIZE( 2 ) )
 OCTET STRING( SIZE( 3296 ) )--
 VisibleString( SIZE( 128 ) )
-- Protocol used to implement AOIP
ACARSOverIP ::=  CHOICE
-- AirCraft-Hello PDU
AirCraft-Hello ::=  SEQUENCE
-- Downlink-ACARS-MSG PDU
DownlinkACARSMessage ::=  SEQUENCE
-- Downlink Union
AOIPDownlinks ::=  CHOICE
-- Ground Hello PDU
GroundHello ::=  SEQUENCE
-- Uplink-ACARS-MSG PDU
UplinkACARSMessage ::=  SEQUENCE
-- Uplink Union
AOIPUplinks ::=  CHOICE
Simulating ACARS Acknowledgments for Downlink Messages
When an ACARS messaging system according to a practical embodiment of the invention is utilized, the conventional ARINC/SITA network is bypassed during transmission. Consequently, the usual ACARS Network ACK (A618) is lost. External LRUs and internal CMU components, however, still expect to receive the A618 ACARS Network ACK to complete an ACARS transaction. This issue is further complicated if downlink ACARS messages are stored (queued) for future transmission as described above, or stored for transmission when the subnetwork is down. In particular, the following issues should be resolved: (1) when to simulate an ACARS Network ACK to external LRUs and signal CMU internal components; and (2) prevent rerouting of ACARS messages and extraneous ACARS Network ACKS.
Processing Of ACARS Downlink Messages—The following is a summary of how an ACARS downlink message can be processed by an example embodiment of the ACARS messaging system. This summary will provide background for the description of the simulated ACK functionality.
Step 1—The aircraft modifiable information (“AMI”) will define the following new attribute for each downlink message type (determined by label) and for each originator (LRUs or CMU originated): GateLifetime. This attribute represents the number of time increments that the ACARS message may age on the CMU storage device, up to a maximum time. For example, GateLifetime may be the number of 30-minute increments, up to a maximum of 48 hours. In practice, the storage device is a mass storage memory device coupled to an appropriate card of the CMU. If 0 is defined, then the message should be sent immediately (no aging permitted). If this field is set to TIME_MAX, then the message should never be deleted (no aging occurs; the message will reside on the CMU storage device until sent to the ground message server). This field is different than the conventional Message Lifetime field in the AMI.
Step 2—For each downlink message, the ACARS routing function will perform the following:
(a) Use the Subnetwork preference byte and Subnetwork_Available flag to determine if the message can be transferred via the TCP/IP datalink. The Subnetwork_Available flag is reported to the ACARS routing function by the ACARS messaging function when the ability to transfer ACARS messages to the ground becomes available, and when the ability is lost.
(b) Determine how long the ACARS message should age. This should be calculated from the GateLifetime and Message Lifetime parameters from the AMI. The determination may simply select the shortest of these two lifetime values.
Step 3—The ACARS messaging function will perform the following:
(a) Receive downlink ACARS messages from the ACARS routing function when the subnetwork is not available. If the given lifetime parameter is greater than zero, then the message is stored on the CMU storage device according to a given priority scheme.
If the given lifetime parameter is zero, then the ACARS routing function is notified that the ACARS downlink message can't be sent.
(b) Receive downlink ACARS messages from the ACARS routing function when the subnetwork is available. As soon as the subnetwork becomes available, the ACARS router begins downloading of any ACARS messages on the storage device to the ground system in priority order. If any received ACARS message from the ACARS routing function is of higher priority than all stored messages, then the ACARS message from the ACARS routing function is transmitted next. If any received ACARS message from the ACARS routing function is of lower priority than any stored message, then store that message and continue transmitting higher priority messages from the storage device over the TCP/IP datalink. If the subnetwork becomes unavailable, then check the lifetime of each stored message. If the lifetime equals zero (or has expired) for a given ACARS downlink message, than discard the message.
Goals/Requirements For Simulating ACARS Network ACKs—The following should be considered in the practical implementation of an ACARS messaging system as described herein.
1. Simulate ACARS Network ACKs to allow external LRUs and internal CMU components to send more than one ACARS message at a time.
2. If the GateLifetime attribute is zero, than do not simulate an ACARS Network ACK until the message is actually received by the ground server.
3. If the subnetwork is up, then send the ACARS message immediately and simulate an ACARS Network ACK.
4. If unable to transmit the ACARS message (e.g., the subnetwork is down) and the GateLifetime attribute is zero, then discard the ACARS message and return an ACARS NAK to the ACARS router. This scenario will allow the ACARS router to re-route the ACARS message, if so desired.
5. If unable to transmit the ACARS message (e.g., the subnetwork is down) and the GateLifetime attribute is greater than zero, then simulate an ACARS Network ACK immediately and store the ACARS message on the storage device for later transmission.
6. If unable to transmit ACARS message (e.g., the subnetwork is down) and the GateLifetime attribute is greater than zero, then delete the ACARS message when the GateLifetime attribute expires. This prevents rerouting and multiple extraneous ACARS Network ACKS.
Use Cases For Simulating ACARS Network ACKs—This section provides Use Cases per our the stated goals and requirements. The following defines the participants:
1. External LRU—LRU separate from the CMU; communicates over 429/A619.
2. ACARS Stack—ACARS implementation residing on the CMU.
3. AM—ACARS Messaging function; resides on the CMU and communicates over TCP/IP.
4. Message Server—Ground server, which is the AM peer; connected to TCP/IP network.
Note that even though all of these use cases define the interaction with an external LRU, any CMU originated ACARS messages will behave in the same manner. In this regard, simply replace the External CMU participant with any internal CMU participant and the use cases still perform the same.
Case 1: Successful Downlink, Simulated ACK—
Case 2: ACARS Message Return For Re-Routing—
Case 3: Successful Delayed Downlink, Simulated ACK—
Case 4: Unsuccessful Downlink, Simulated ACK—
Processing for the ACARS Router
The following implementation notes refer to one practical embodiment of the ACARS message system described herein. Of course, an actual implementation of the system can vary according to the needs and requirements of the particular deployment.
Downlink ACARS Messages:
1. Messages will be deemed worthy of subnetwork transmission by some internal method.
2. A619 processing will occur on the ACARS router prior to the message being transferred for further processing. Such further processing may include, for example, A619 header stripping and A619 application ACKs.
3. ACARS messages will not be segmented.
4. If appropriate, ACARS messages can be encrypted prior to ACARS router processing.
5. Subnetwork worthy messages should be processed and sent immediately. Queuing is not necessary and immediate transfer to the storage device is performed. Queuing is maintained on the storage device coupled to the ACARS router. Since the storage device functions as a hard disk for storage of subnetwork-bound ACARS messages, power transients or other power disruptions will not result in loss of these ACARS messages.
6. The parameters of a downlink ACARS message to be transferred include: user-text, label, sublabel, message sequence number, and Flight Identifier. It is assumed that the user-text parameter may be encrypted, but the other parameters will not be encrypted.
Uplink ACARS Messages:
1. For a message destined to an airborne end system (e.g., the flight management system), A619 processing can occur after the message has been received by the ACARS router. Such processing may include, for example, appending an A619 header and receiving A619 application ACKs.
2. ACARS messages will not be received in segmented form (in multiple blocks). If the true destination is an LRU over Character Oriented Protocol 429 and the message text is greater than 220 octets (one block), then some post-processing will need to be performed to manipulate the message text into appropriate sized blocks. The “post-processing” may be performed by any suitable processing element of the ACARS router, and the location of such processing is an implementation decision.
3. ACARS messages may be received in encrypted form. If encrypted, the messages will be decrypted by the ACARS router.
4. The parameters of an uplink ACARS message to be transferred to the ACARS router include: user-text, label, and sublabel. It is assumed that the user-text parameter may be encrypted, but the other parameters will not be encrypted.
5. Any message received from the ground system via the subnetwork will not require an A618 ACARS ACK due to the bypassing of the airborne ACARS stack and the ground-based data service provider.
Processing for the Message Processing Ground Server
1. The message processing server should support one TCP/IP connection per aircraft.
2. The aircraft will initiate the TCP/IP connection to the message processing server when the subnetwork is available.
3. The message processing server will support multiple TCP/IP connections (dependent on the number of aircraft at airport gates at any one time).
4. The message processing server will to exercise the ACARS messaging protocol as set forth in more detail above.
5. The message processing server will populate and interpret the PDUs as described in more detail above.
6. If appropriate, the message processing server will perform encryption and decryption processing of the text field. Other fields need not be encrypted.
7. The message text will not be segmented. The CMU can support a text field up to 3296 octets (per ARINC 619) for use with Bit Oriented Protocol.
8. The text field of a Downlink-ACARS-MSG PDU may contain multiple supplemental addresses. The message processing server will either distribute these messages as appropriate, or disallow messages with more than one supplemental address.
9. Downlink ACARS messages with label QA through QT depend on the ARINC/SITA data service provider to provide certain formatting of the messages prior to delivery to the destination. Since the ACARS messaging system described herein does not rely on a data service provider when the subnetwork is used, the message processing server will provide this same type of formatting. The message processing server will determine whether this formatting is appropriate; if not, it will forgo the extra processing and simply alert the end user that the text will be seen in its raw format.
10. The message processing server will need to manage lost connections to the aircraft (either graceful disconnects, or TCP/IP connection timeouts).
While at least one exemplary embodiment has been presented in the foregoing detailed description, it should be appreciated that a vast number of variations exist. It should also be appreciated that the exemplary embodiment or exemplary embodiments are only examples, and are not intended to limit the scope, applicability, or configuration of the invention in any way. Rather, the foregoing detailed description will provide those skilled in the art with a convenient road map for implementing the exemplary embodiment or exemplary embodiments. It should be understood that various changes can be made in the function and arrangement of elements without departing from the scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims and the legal equivalents thereof.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US5224098||Jul 17, 1991||Jun 29, 1993||International Business Machines Corporation||Compensation for mismatched transport protocols in a data communications network|
|US5894557||Mar 29, 1996||Apr 13, 1999||International Business Machines Corporation||Flexible point-to-point protocol framework|
|US6161097||Jun 4, 1998||Dec 12, 2000||The United Sates Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration||Automated traffic management system and method|
|US6229809||Oct 10, 1997||May 8, 2001||Novell, Inc.||Method and system for combining computer network protocols|
|US6249818||Jun 30, 1993||Jun 19, 2001||Compaq Computer Corporation||Network transport driver interfacing|
|US6266701||Jul 2, 1997||Jul 24, 2001||Sitara Networks, Inc.||Apparatus and method for improving throughput on a data network|
|US6278965||Aug 10, 1998||Aug 21, 2001||The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration||Real-time surface traffic adviser|
|US6418128||Sep 21, 1998||Jul 9, 2002||Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba||Scheme for adaptive control of transport layer connection in communications via radio and wire networks|
|US6434156||Jul 24, 1998||Aug 13, 2002||Nortel Networks Limited||Virtual switching for interconnected networks|
|US6529706||Sep 13, 1999||Mar 4, 2003||Rockwell Collins, Inc.||Aircraft satellite communications system for distributing internet service from direct broadcast satellites|
|US6542740||Oct 24, 2000||Apr 1, 2003||Litepoint, Corp.||System, method and article of manufacture for utilizing a wireless link in an interface roaming network framework|
|US6546425||Jun 11, 1999||Apr 8, 2003||Netmotion Wireless, Inc.||Method and apparatus for providing mobile and other intermittent connectivity in a computing environment|
|US6604030||Jun 6, 2000||Aug 5, 2003||Ozuna Holdings Incorporated||Single fault impervious integrated control and monitoring system|
|US6621420||Nov 29, 2001||Sep 16, 2003||Siavash Poursartip||Device and method for integrated wireless transit and emergency vehicle management|
|US6631416||Apr 11, 2001||Oct 7, 2003||Openreach Inc.||Methods and systems for enabling a tunnel between two computers on a network|
|US6677888||Aug 9, 2002||Jan 13, 2004||Honeywell International, Inc.||Secure aircraft communications addressing and reporting system (ACARS)|
|US7512714||Aug 31, 2004||Mar 31, 2009||Honeywell International Inc.||System and method for transmitting ACARS messages over a TCP/IP data communication link|
|US20020032006||May 4, 2001||Mar 14, 2002||K. Prasad Nair||Efficient network routing method for air/ground data services|
|US20050181787||Feb 18, 2004||Aug 18, 2005||Judd Tom D.||Systems and methods for encoding and decoding data messages|
|US20070243867||Jun 22, 2007||Oct 18, 2007||Arinc Incorporated||Acars messages over iridium|
|WO2005081496A1||Feb 18, 2005||Sep 1, 2005||Honeywell International, Inc.||Systems and methods for encoding and decoding data messages|
|1||"Aircom Datalink ACARS Service-Ground Access Supplement to Technical Data Sheet", Jun. 14, 2004, Publisher: SITA.|
|2||"Aircom Datalink ACARS Service—Ground Access Supplement to Technical Data Sheet", Jun. 14, 2004, Publisher: SITA.|
|3||Grappel, Ray, "Open System Protocols for Aviation Data Link Applications", "IEEE 19th Digital Avionics Systems Conference", Oct. 2000, Published in: Philadelphia, PA.|
|4||Oishi, Roy, "Future Applications and The Aeronautical Telecommunications Network", "IEEE Proceedings, Aerospace Conference", Mar. 2001, Published in: Big Sky, MT.|
|5||Roy Aloke, "Secure Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System (ACARS)", "IEEE 20th Conference of Digtial Avionics Systems", Oct. 2001, Published in: Daytona Beach, FL.|
|6||Skysweep Technologies, "Skysweep Version 2.10 Reference Manual", 2002, Page(s) 149 pages.|
|7||Stephens, Bob, "Aeronautical Telecommunications Using IPV6", "NASA Integrated CNS Conference", May 19-22, 2003, Page(s) 44 pages, Published in: Annapolis, MD.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US8468263 *||Feb 12, 2009||Jun 18, 2013||The Boeing Company||Onboard network system architecture for improved communication and method of use|
|US8796156||Jan 4, 2012||Aug 5, 2014||Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd.||Cross OD FinFET patterning|
|US9130058||Sep 1, 2010||Sep 8, 2015||Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd.||Forming crown active regions for FinFETs|
|US9190417||Feb 1, 2013||Nov 17, 2015||Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd.||Fin-like field effect transistor (FinFET) device and method of manufacturing same|
|US20110176617 *||Feb 12, 2009||Jul 21, 2011||Fagan C L||Onboard network system network architecture|
|U.S. Classification||709/246, 709/230, 455/431|
|Cooperative Classification||H04L69/08, H04L69/06, H04L67/12, G06F9/546, G06F9/544, H04B7/18506|
|European Classification||H04L29/06D, H04B7/185B4, G06F9/54M, H04L29/06E, G06F9/54F|
|Apr 8, 2010||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC., NEW JERSEY
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:ECKERT, RICHARD J.;JUDD, THOMAS D.;SIGNING DATES FROM 20100216 TO 20100407;REEL/FRAME:024206/0655
|Aug 28, 2012||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Aug 26, 2016||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8