|Publication number||USRE42020 E1|
|Application number||US 09/900,784|
|Publication date||Jan 4, 2011|
|Filing date||Jul 6, 2001|
|Priority date||Apr 21, 1993|
|Also published as||CA2213973A1, CA2213973C, DE69621782D1, DE69621782T2, EP0812509A1, EP0812509A4, EP0812509B1, US5488433, USRE37342, USRE41968, USRE42160, USRE42657, USRE42709, WO1996027263A1|
|Publication number||09900784, 900784, US RE42020 E1, US RE42020E1, US-E1-RE42020, USRE42020 E1, USRE42020E1|
|Inventors||Barry H. Schwab, Kinya Washino|
|Original Assignee||Multi-Format, Inc.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (32), Non-Patent Citations (16), Classifications (80)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
More than one reissue application has been filed for the reissue of patent application Ser. No. 09/016,777, now U.S. Pat. No. RE37,342. The reissue applications are application Ser. Nos. 11/003,576, filed Dec. 3, 2004, 11/003,580, filed Dec. 3, 2004, 11/003,579, filed Dec. 3, 2004, and 11/003,834, filed Dec. 3, 2004, all of which are continuation reissues of patent application Ser. No. 09/900,784 (the present application). This is a continuation of U.S. reissue application Ser. No. 09/016,777, filed Jan. 30, 1998 (Pat. No. 5,488,433) , now U.S. Pat. No. RE37,342, which is a reissue of U.S. Ser. No. 08/396,574, filed Mar. 1, 1995, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,488,433, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 08/298,104, filed Aug. 30, 1994, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,537,157, and U.S. application Ser. No. 08/050,861, filed Apr. 21, 1993, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,450,140, the entire contents of all of which the above-identified patent applications and resulting issued patents are incorporated herein by reference.
This invention relates generally to video recording systems associated with the editing of program materials, and, more particularly, to a system that takes advantage of a PC-based platform for performing non-linear editing functions.
Traditional video editing systems are generally divided into two categories: linear and non-linear. Linear editing systems are generally integrated with tape-based program storage, while non-linear editing systems are associated more closely with disk-based storage media, wherein random-access storage more easily may be implemented. The typical linear editing system is implemented with one of the many “broadcast quality” videotape recording formats. The choices for analog recorders include, among others, 1″ C-format, Betacam, Betacam-SP, ¾″ U-matic, U-matic-SP, S-VHS, and Hi-8. The choices for digital recorders include, among others, D-1, D-2, D-3, D-5, DCT, and Digital Beta-cam. Each of these recording formats is incompatible with any other format, and all require sophisticated system facilities, including synchronization systems, edit controllers, audio and video switchers and processors, digital video effects (DVE) systems, character generators, and other equipment. This, in turn, requires extensive physical plant facilities for electric power, air conditioning and air filtration, storage space, and maintenance equipment. Furthermore, large operational and maintenance staffs are required to keep the equipment in good working order. However, recording duration capacity for these types of videotape recorders ranges up to three hours or more, making them uniquely valuable for many applications, such as program distribution, archival storage, and as master program sources for mass duplication of videos for the home video market.
In contrast, non-linear systems are based on optical discs, or alternatively, on magnetic or magneto-optical disks. Because of the relatively high cost of these storage media when long-duration recording periods are required, such systems are relegated to use as off-line editing systems applied to the preparation of edit decision lists (EDLs) for use in edit suites incorporating linear editing systems. However, the rapid random-access features and editing ease are valuable for short programs.
As currently implemented by many manufacturers (such as AVID and videoCube), PC-based hard disk storage is very expensive. If equipped with 10 GB of storage capacity, the system, in practice, is utilized in a two-step process. First, the original unedited program material is digitized at a high data-compression ratio to provide representative pictures for use in an off-line editing environment, whereby the operator may develop an EDL. This EDL then is used to perform the required editing, using program materials that have been digitized and stored at much lower data-compression ratios. Because these two digitizing steps must be performed in real time, this is an expensive, time-consuming process which requires well-trained and expensive operational and engineering personnel.
It is an object of the invention to integrate the most valuable features of linear and non-linear editing system approaches.
It is another object of the invention to provide capabilities for automatic unattended editing from edit decision lists developed on an off-line editing system.
It is yet another object of the invention to provide a PC-based digital video recorder for applications such as broadcast television playback, video duplication source-master playback, or other related applications.
A further object of the invention is to provide extended playback of 40 hours or more of digital video programming, for cable television or other uses.
The present invention achieves these and other objectives by providing a PC-based audio/video production system which addresses the problem of providing inexpensive alternatives to the large, expensive edit suites currently in common use. Digital program source materials, produced by specially modified cameras or other sources, provide data-compressed audio and video program materials in two formats having matched edit-time-code identification. A first format having a higher data-compression ratio and intended for use in an off-line editing system is used to develop an edit decision list, and a second format having a lower data-compression ratio is used in an on-line editing system for the production of a final representation of the program. As such, off-line editing decisions may be developed on a PC, including a portable PC, using removable storage media, and final representations of the programs may be implemented on a stationary-head or rotary-head digital-tape-based format, such as DAT, 6-mm or 8-mm.
By employing one of several new, small, inexpensive storage media such as PCMCIA-based disk drives, and by utilizing data-compression technology, the off-line editing capabilities are achieved in an economical system, with the digital-tape-based formats providing broadcast-quality required even for demanding applications. Recording duration capacity for these media is 60 to 120 minutes or longer for conventional NTSC or PAL video formats, and a natural extension to HDTV formats (with comparable program duration capacity) is achieved as commercial availability of storage media having higher recording densities becomes economically practical. Where compatibility to film materials is desirable, operation of the various system components at 24 frames-per-second is implemented.
A method of producing a final video program according to the invention therefore includes the steps of providing program-source materials in first and second digital formats, the first format being characterized in having a higher data compression ratio than the second; recording the materials in the first and second formats, respectively, onto first and second removable storage media along with correlated edit-time-code information in each case; interfacing the first storage medium to an off-line video editing system to develop an edit decision list; interfacing the second storage medium to an on-line video editing system; transferring the edit decision list developed in conjunction with the off-line video editing system to the on-line video editing system; and editing the materials in the second format on the second storage medium, in accordance with the edit decision list, to produce a final video program.
The internal video recording facilities are comprised of two parts. First, a lower data-compression-ratio digital audio/video signal is recorded on a stationary-head or rotary-head digital data tape recorder (such as quarter-inch cartridge, half-inch cartridge, DAT, 6-mm or 8-mm) in the removable-tape transport 18, intended for utilization in an off-line video editing system, described herein below. Simultaneously, a second digital audio/video signal having a higher data-compression ratio is recorded on a removable storage media unit 20. This removable storage medium is intended for utilization in an off-line video editing system, also described herein below. In practice, this removable storage medium may be implemented by any of several well known technologies, such as magnetic or magneto-optical disks, optical discs, or semiconductor memory modules. The two signal recording media implemented in the two parts of the internal video recording facilities may record the audio and video signals in separated form, or alternatively may be implemented by any of several well-known systems for interleaved audio/video data, such as the audio/video interleave (“AVI”) system of Microsoft Corporation, the “M-Power” technique offered by Hewlett-Packard, or other systems.
Examples of removable storage media include PCMCIA-based removable disk drives (currently available with capacities of 420 MBytes, and soon to be available with capacities as high as 1 GByte) and 8-mm. tape cassettes (currently available with capacity of 20 GB, and soon to be available with capacities as high as 80 GB). At a data-compression ratio of 50:1, 420 MBytes will store approximately 75 minutes of program material (in NTSC format using an image dimension in pixels of 320×240 for off-line editing), and at a data-compression ratio of 5:1, 20 GB also will store approximately 60 minutes of program material. When the newer 50 GB or 80 GB tapes become available, these tapes will be capable of storing either four hours of programming in NTSC or PAL format, or two hours in an HDTV format, making them practical for use in those applications currently allocated to linear editing equipment, as described above. Alternatively, using the currently available MPEG-2 data compression with a ratio of 20:1, a 20 GB tape will accommodate four hours of NTSC or PAL recording (or one hour of HDTV); an 80 GB tape will accommodate 16 hours of NTSC or PAL recording (or four hours for HDTV). Where compatibility to film materials is desirable, operation of the various system components at 24 frames-per-second is implemented.
Microprocessor 74, through user interface provisions 75 (such as keyboards, touch-screens, etc.) controls the 64-bit or wider data bus 80, which integrates the various components. Currently available microprocessors include the Alpha 21064 by Digital Equipment Corporation, and the MIPS R4400 by MIPS Technologies, Inc. Future implementations might rely on the already announced P6 by Intel Corp. or the PowerPC 620. An alternative architecture may be implemented using multiple processors working in parallel to increase the effective frame rate. The PCI data bus, for example, is capable of sustained data transfer rates of 100 MB/sec. A ROM 76 is used for fixed program storage. The RAM 78 preferably has the capacity to function as a buffer, representing 25 seconds or more of live NTSC video in 4:2:2 format, to enable “hot-swapping” of removable media without interruption of the input video signal during recording or alternatively the output video signal during playback. Graphics processor 82 represents dedicated hardware which performs the various manipulations required to process input video signals 84 and to output the video signals 86. Although shown as Y/R-Y/B-Y format, either the inputs or outputs, or both, may be configured in alternative formats, such as RGB, YIQ, YUV or other commonly used alternatives.
While a software-based implementation of the data compression is possible, a hardware-based implementation is preferred, with the system employing, for the tape-based drives, a data-compression ratio of 5:1 for conventional signals (NTSC/PAL) and a 10:1 data-compression ratio for HDTV signals. For the hard-disk drive, a data-compression ratio of 50:1 is preferably utilized. Examples of the many available options for this data compression function include the currently available Apple QuickTime system, fractal compression, MPEG-1 (for off-line applications) and Motion-JPEG (for on-line applications). In many applications, MPEG-2 data compression will be suitable for on-line editing. Audio signals may be included within the data stream, as proposed in the several systems for digital television transmission already under evaluation by the Federal Communications Commission, or by one of the methods available for integrating audio and video signals used in multi-media recording schemes, such as the Microsoft “.AVI” (Audio/Video Interleave) file format. As an alternative, an independent system for recording audio signals may be implemented, either by employing separate digital recording provisions controlled by the same system and electronics, or by implementing completely separate equipment external to the camera system described above.
As an optional feature, a PCMCIA expansion adapter 106 may be provided, so that a plurality of PCMCIA cards or PCMCIA devices 108 may be accessed conveniently through a single PCMCIA slot on the PC, as shown. This expansion adapter is provided with internal selection and multiplexing circuitry, so that each plug-in card or device may be accessed independently and without interference with any other card or device in the expansion adapter. The selection may be performed by employing techniques well-known in the art, such as the addressing schemes utilized for SCSI or GPIB data busses. Since a single 420 MByte PCMCIA card module is capable of holding 75 minutes of programming material with image dimensions in pixels of 320×240, 4:2:2 sampling and a 50:1 data compression ratio, an expansion adapter equipped with ten PCMCIA slots and plug-in cards is capable of providing ten hours of original program material, and this programming capacity is capable of being further expanded with other types of PCMCIA-compatible devices. As a further option, a custom-designed PC could be provided with multiple PCMCIA slots to accept a plurality of storage devices without the need for an external expansion adapter.
In operation, the off-line digital video editing system PC is used to edit and combine the materials stored on various data-storage devices, producing an edit decision list which then may be utilized by an on-line editing system. The availability of multiple storage devices enables the operator to rehearse and then confirm “A/B-roll” edits with only two storage devices, and “A/B/C-roll” edits with three storage devices. When equipped with expansion provisions or additional SCSI-bus devices, the system is capable of controlling the various storage devices so as to produce highly complicated sequences in a convenient and timely manner. While the lower-quality (higher data-compression ratio) program materials are utilized only for determining the edit points (edit decision list) for the program, the off-line editing system described herein below is capable of producing the final edited version of the program with high-quality results in accordance with the preferred embodiment.
The versatility of the system may be further enhanced if planning for the program is begun by providing script and staging information to the computer in advance of editing, or even in advance of filming or taping the original production. The script may be provided as a simple text file, or as a formatted word processor file, such as used in “WordPerfect” or “Word for Windows”. As an alternative, the file may be of a custom format, as is commonly used by professional scriptwriters. This script and staging information is then reformatted to include specific commands, such as when to switch camera coverage to a particular actor, or the choice of a particular camera angle. Further details may now be included, such as the ability to identify close-up camera coverage, or points at which specific visual special effects (such as split-screen views or chroma-keyed backgrounds) or sound effects are to be incorporated. The modified script file is then used to guide the operator of the off-line editing system in making edit decisions to match the program materials to the script, to make any modifications to the script that are necessitated by the circumstances of the taping, or to take advantage of any unforeseen artistic opportunities presented by the actual taped materials.
In addition, it is common practice in broadcast-television news studios to use remotely controlled cameras to telecast the live programs. These cameras are mounted on motorized bases which are capable of moving the cameras to any desired position on the stage, within the physical limits imposed by the stage itself (such as the length of the camera cables or the clearance available for cameras to move relative to each other on the stage). The zoom-lenses, pan-tilt mounts, and camera electronic control settings are manipulated through the camera remote-control facilities, which may include either separate electronic control panels or alternatively computer interfaces with appropriate control software, such as the unit described by washino Washino, U.S. Pat. No. 5,325,202. By coupling the software script materials to instructions for control of the camera movements, the capabilities of all of these systems may be optimized. The modified script file must be prepared before the actual taping occurs, however, and should include the physical layout of the sets and props for each scene.
The staging information described herein above, is identified by special camera-remote-control software, and the camera control operator is provided with a graphical interface which depicts the layout of the set and the “blocked” positions of the actors and props for a given scene. This system preferably also includes a user interface (such as a touch-screen or a mouse) to enable the camera control operator to program the cameras to be in the correct location, and to have the correct zoom-lens and pan-tilt positions, to capture the scene as desired, as described in co-pending application U.S. Ser. No. 08/050,861. At this time, the operator optionally may add information to control automated lighting systems, which are well-known in the art of the film, video, and stage production. This enhanced version of the modified script file is then used to direct camera actions during the actual taping of the scenes, and is further modified as part of the off-line editing process as the EDL is developed, as described above, in accordance with the invention.
An on-line digital video editing system is depicted in block-diagram form in FIG. 4. The functional operation of the editing system follows that of the digital video editing system disclosed in
The edits incorporated into the edit decision list are utilized to sequence the various digital tapes so as to assemble a recording of the desired program materials into a final finished product, which is then recorded on the videotape recorder 202. This video recorder may be implemented as any of the commonly used choices for analog recorders, including, among others, 1″ C-format, Betacam, Betacam-SP, U-matic-SP, and Hi-8. If implemented as a digital recorder, the available choices include, among others, D-1, D-2, D-3, D-5, DCT, and Digital Betacam. Furthermore, the final format could be another digital data tape such as the type used for program source material or any other removable storage media. Since the time-code identification numbers on the removable media of the off-line system correlate with those utilized in the on-line system, no conversion or adaptation of the edit decision list is needed. The video monitor 204 is used to manipulate the windows-based edit system control software, and to view the program materials as the edit process proceeds. This process will be essentially automatic, as all of the necessary decisions already have been made in the off-line editing process as described above. In addition, this is an appropriate time for adding digital video effects to the program or to implement any special effects included in the program script.
The invention may be used for other applications limited to record/playback, without implementing the full range of editing features. For example, in applications such as master playback for video duplication, the program master tape must be played, rewound to the beginning, and then restarted, on a repeating cycle. In facilities employing a conventional video tape recorder, this represents a great deal of physical stress on the program master tape, thereby requiring a large number of copies of this master tape when many production runs are required to complete an order. In addition, some production time is lost due to the rewinding process itself. In a disk-based application of the system disclosed herein, there is no significant deterioration of the master program even in repeated usage, and it is possible to begin playing a program at any point desired, with essentially no delay due no cueing the program media to the physical location containing that part of the recorded program. In order to provide the necessary recording time duration, additional hard-disk drives would be added to achieve the required playback duration. Based on an MPEG-2 data-compression ratio of 20:1 (with a 4:2:2 recording system for NTSC signals), two hours of digital video would require approximately 8 GB of disk storage capacity. Disk-drives offering capacity of 9 GB are currently available, and until removable media achieve comparable levels, a program would accordingly be loaded into internal or external disk-storage units from the required number of removable media units.
The invention may also be employed as a playback unit for cable television usage or other extended-playing time applications. By adding as many “juke-box” units as desired, it is a simple matter to extend the playback time capability of the system, with each “juke-box” providing approximately 40 hours of digital video playback. By fully utilizing the RAM-based audio/video buffering capabilities discussed with reference to
The versatility of the Digital Video Production System may be enhanced further, if planning for the program is begun by providing script and staging information to the computer in advance of editing, or even in advance of filming or taping the original production. Computer software having access to the script materials will enable the operator to match the scenes to the recorded video materials quickly, thereby speeding the editing process. In addition, it is common practice in broadcast-television news studios to use remotely-controlled cameras to telecast the live programs. By coupling the software script materials to instructions for control of the camera movements, the capabilities of all of these systems will be optimized.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4148069||Feb 14, 1977||Apr 3, 1979||Harris Corporation||Automatic cable loss compensator for use in a television camera system|
|US4198656||Oct 24, 1975||Apr 15, 1980||Pelco Sales||Video sequencer-processor|
|US4205346||Jun 9, 1978||May 27, 1980||Ross Video Limited||Video transition circuitry including transition previewing means|
|US4477896||Oct 2, 1981||Oct 16, 1984||Aker Eric M||Single-wire data transmission system having bidirectional data synchronization, and D.C. power for remote units|
|US4516156||Mar 15, 1982||May 7, 1985||Satellite Business Systems||Teleconferencing method and system|
|US4633293||Aug 13, 1984||Dec 30, 1986||Rca Corporation||High definition television signal for film-television standards conversion system|
|US4907085||Sep 22, 1988||Mar 6, 1990||Thomson Consumer Electronics, Inc.||Television system user-accessible component display apparatus|
|US4949169||Oct 27, 1989||Aug 14, 1990||International Business Machines Corporation||Audio-video data interface for a high speed communication link in a video-graphics display window environment|
|US5012334||Jan 29, 1990||Apr 30, 1991||Dubner Computer Systems, Inc.||Video image bank for storing and retrieving video image sequences|
|US5045932||Jun 29, 1989||Sep 3, 1991||Eastman Kodak Company||Method and apparatus for generating a high definition electronic signal from a line scan of a color original|
|US5079634||Mar 13, 1991||Jan 7, 1992||Alps Electric Co., Ltd.||Apparatus for wireless-controlling a camera and apparatus for two-direction simultaneous control of electrically-driven equipment|
|US5128770||Feb 27, 1991||Jul 7, 1992||Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd.||Video camera|
|US5164839||Oct 11, 1991||Nov 17, 1992||Explore Technology, Inc.||Method for handling audio/video source information|
|US5206732||Dec 11, 1991||Apr 27, 1993||Sony Broadcast & Communications Limited||Video camera control apparatus|
|US5206929 *||Oct 26, 1990||Apr 27, 1993||Sony Corporation Of America||Offline editing system|
|US5218672 *||Jan 19, 1990||Jun 8, 1993||Sony Corporation Of America||Offline editing system with user interface for controlling edit list generation|
|US5243433||Jan 6, 1992||Sep 7, 1993||Eastman Kodak Company||Digital image interpolation system for zoom and pan effects|
|US5327235||Jan 27, 1993||Jul 5, 1994||Sony United Kingdom Limited||Video conversions of video signal formats|
|US5459582||Jun 29, 1994||Oct 17, 1995||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Video signal processing system for taking into a memory a specified picture extracted from moving images|
|US5572499||Sep 20, 1994||Nov 5, 1996||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Image processing apparatus for storing image data in storage medium and/or for reproducing image stored in storage medium|
|US5649046||Dec 3, 1993||Jul 15, 1997||Quantel Limited||Video processing system with random access framestore for video editing|
|USRE37342 *||Jan 30, 1998||Aug 28, 2001||Multi-Format, Inc.||Dual format digital video production system|
|EP0314873A1||Jun 30, 1988||May 10, 1989||GRUNDIG E.M.V. Elektro-Mechanische Versuchsanstalt Max Grundig holländ. Stiftung & Co. KG.||Device for automatic application of tuning voltage to tunable components of the intermediate frequency amplifier for television receivers|
|EP0503480A2||Mar 5, 1992||Sep 16, 1992||Teac Corporation||Multitrack tape system having a random access storage medium for easier editing and higher capacity|
|EP0514012A2||Apr 15, 1992||Nov 19, 1992||Vistek Electronics Limited||Method and apparatus for the standard conversion of an image signal|
|GB330020A *||Title not available|
|JPH05101609A||Title not available|
|JPH08292100A||Title not available|
|JPS5844856A||Title not available|
|WO1994029868A2||Jun 10, 1994||Dec 22, 1994||Lightworks Editing Systems Ltd||Video editing systems|
|WO1996005696A1||Aug 14, 1995||Feb 22, 1996||Sony Corporation||Video signal recording device and video signal editing device|
|WO2001005586A1||Jul 14, 2000||Jan 25, 2001||Wm. Marsh Rice University||Temperature-sensitive polymer/nanoshell composites for photothermally modulated drug delivery|
|1||3-Chip CCD Portable Color Camera BVP-70/70P.|
|2||3-Chip CCD Studio/OB Color System BVP-370, BVP-270.|
|3||A. Kaiser, H. W. Mahler, R.H. McMann, "Resolution Requirements for HDTV Based Upon the Performance of 35 mm Motion-Picture Films for Theatrical Viewing", SMPTE Journal, Jun. 1985, pp. 654-659.|
|4||B. Hunt, G. Kennel, L. DeMarsh, S. Kristy, "High-Resolution Electronic Intermediate System for Motion-Picture Film," SMPTE Journal, Mar. 1991, pp. 156-161.|
|5||Future Productions, Inc. "Breakthrough in Video Production and Duplication".|
|6||G. Demos, "An Example of Hierarchy of Formats for HDTV", SMPTE Journal, Sep. 1992, pp. 609-617.|
|7||G. Reitmeier, C. Carlson, E. Geiger, D. Westerkamp, "The Digital Hierarchy-A Blueprint for Television in the 21st Century", SMPTE Journal, Jul. 1992, pp. 466-470.|
|8||G. Reitmeier, C. Carlson, E. Geiger, D. Westerkamp, "The Digital Hierarchy—A Blueprint for Television in the 21st Century", SMPTE Journal, Jul. 1992, pp. 466-470.|
|9||J.S. Lim, "A Proposal for an HDTV/ATV Standard with Multiple Transmission Formats", SMPTE Journal, Aug. 1993, pp. 699-702.|
|10||L.J. Thorpe, T. Hanabusa, "If Progressive Scanning is So Good, How Bad is Interlace?", SMPTE Journal, Dec. 1990, pp. 972-986.|
|11||Panasonic NAP 95 Catalog, No date.|
|12||R. Turner, "1,001 Questions to Ask Before Deciding on a Nonlinear Video Editing System," SMPTE Tutorials, SMPTE Journal, Mar. 1994, pp. 160-170.|
|13||Tekronix Inc. Research Disclosure, No. 330, p. 738, Oct. 1991 T. Mann, "Non-Linear Off-Line Editing for HDTV and Film," Image Technology, Dec. 1989, pp. 541-546.|
|14||W. E. Bretl, "3XNTSC-A 'Leapfrog' Production Standard for HDTV", SMPTE Journal, Mar. 1989, pp. 173-178.|
|15||W. E. Bretl, "3XNTSC—A ‘Leapfrog’ Production Standard for HDTV", SMPTE Journal, Mar. 1989, pp. 173-178.|
|16||Y. Ide, M. Sasuga, N. Harada, T. Nishizawa, "A Three-CCD HDTV Color Camera", SMPTE Journal, Jul. 1990, pp. 532-537.|
|International Classification||H04N5/76, H04N5/91, H04N9/804, H04N9/64, G11B27/34, H04N5/781, H04N7/10, G11B27/032, H04N5/907, H04N7/14, H04N5/926, G11B27/024, G11B27/034, G11B27/031, H04N5/765, H04N7/18, H04N7/01, H04N5/44, G11B27/00, H04N5/915, H04N7/15, H04N5/85, H04N5/92, H04N5/77, H04N1/00, G06F3/14, H04N5/232, G09G5/00, G06T9/00, H04N5/222|
|Cooperative Classification||H04N5/765, H04N5/23203, H04N9/8042, H04N9/7921, H04N9/641, H04N9/8063, G06T9/007, G11B27/034, G11B2220/2525, H04N9/8047, H04N9/642, G11B2220/455, H04N5/232, G11B2220/20, H04N5/907, G11B27/031, G11B2220/2516, G11B2220/90, G11B2220/61, G09G2340/02, G06F3/14, G11B27/024, H04N5/222, G06F3/1454, G11B2220/913, H04N5/915, G09G2340/0442, G11B27/032, G11B27/002, G11B27/34, H04N5/772, G11B2220/41, H04N5/781, G09G2340/0407, H04N5/4401, H04N5/85|
|European Classification||H04N5/232, H04N5/765, H04N5/232C, H04N5/222, G06T9/00T, G06F3/14, G11B27/34, G11B27/031, H04N9/804B, G11B27/00A, H04N5/77B, H04N9/79M, G11B27/032|