|Publication number||USRE42161 E1|
|Application number||US 09/382,702|
|Publication date||Feb 22, 2011|
|Filing date||Aug 24, 1999|
|Priority date||Jun 27, 1996|
|Also published as||CA2259258A1, EP0907999A1, EP0907999A4, US5661645, WO1997050168A1|
|Publication number||09382702, 382702, US RE42161 E1, US RE42161E1, US-E1-RE42161, USRE42161 E1, USRE42161E1|
|Inventors||Peter Anthony Hochstein|
|Original Assignee||Relume Corporation|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (103), Non-Patent Citations (96), Referenced by (13), Classifications (20), Legal Events (3)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application is the parent of a continuation reissue application filed Mar. 5, 2008, and accorded application Ser. No. 12/074,723.
The present invention relates generally to an apparatus for generating power to a light emitting diode array and, in particular, to a power supply for operating light emitting diode array traffic signals.
Light emitting diode (LED) arrays are becoming more common in many applications as they are used to replace less efficient incandescent lamps. Status annunciators, message boards, liquid crystal display back lights and traffic signals are common applications for LED arrays. In most of these uses, electrical power is obtained from a.c. mains (120 v.a.c., 60 Hz) and some form of power supply converts the alternating line voltage to d.c., or pulsing d.c., for powering the plurality of LEDs.
LEDs typically exhibit forward voltage drops on the order of 1.2 to 2.0 volts when driven at average currents of 20 to 25 ma. For purposes of efficiency, the LEDs are usually connected in series so that a higher power supply voltage can be used to light an array of LEDs.
In many applications where a relatively large number of LEDs are necessary to deliver substantial light output, several series strings of LEDs with a ballasting resistor in each string are normally connected in parallel. As shown in the
A non dissipative. unregulated power supply for LED signals is shown in
Several problems are associated with these prior art simple circuit topologies. The input current wave forms are generally badly distorted and the power factor is poor. Reasons for the poor power factor and high distortion relate to the discontinuous conduction of the diodes in the circuit feeding large capacitors. This phenomenon is well understood, and plagues many small off line power supplies. Until recently these concerns were essentially disregarded by the electrical power industry because the impact to the power grid was relatively small. Of course, as larger numbers of these low power appliances are connected to the power grid, the effect is no longer inconsequential. In fact, many utilities are placing limits on permissible power factor and distortion behavior of electrical devices connected to their lines.
LED traffic signals are being retrofitted in place of incandescent lamps primarily because of the energy savings common to LED signals. For example, an 8 inch diameter incandescent signal might consume 67 watts and its LED equivalent 14 watts, or a 12 inch diameter incandescent signal would consume 150 watts while its LED replacement would consume only 28 watts. The dramatic energy savings translate into greatly reduced operating cost, which is an important criterion, as electrical power is becoming more expensive. Also, in many parts of the country, electrical generating capacity is at its limits, and new capacity cannot be added because of environmental concerns. This strong interest in LED signals as an important energy conservation resource is clouded however by the poor power factor performance of commercially available signals.
Power factor (p.f.) is well understood in the electrical engineering community as the ratio of real power to real power plus reactive power, or more conveniently. p.f.=cos θ where θ is the angle in electrical degrees of the current-voltage phase offset. That is, in many reactive loads powered by sinusoidal (alternating) current, the voltage and current may be out of phase.
The apparent power that has to be delivered to a given load in volt-amperes (VA) is, therefore equal to the true power consumption of the device in Watts divided by the power factor. For example, an appliance with an internal power consumption of 100 Watts that exhibited a power factor of 0.4, would require 100/0.4 or 250 VA of energy from the power line and utility generator. Taken separately, the many small electrical appliances that are widely used have only a moderate effect on generating capacity. However in aggregate, a large number of small devices can have a significant impact on the power grid.
By means of example, a medium size city (San Francisco) may have some 2000 signalized intersections with a total of 16,000 mixed 8 inch and 12 inch traffic signals. If the existing incandescent signals with an average power consumption of 100 watts are replaced with LED variants of 20 watt rating, a significant power saving should result. The 1600 kilowatt (kW) load imposed by the incandescent signals should be reduced to 320 kw by the LED retrofit devices. However, if the LED signals exhibit an actual power factor of 0.3, the resulting load to the power grid is 320 kW divided by 0.3 p.f. or 1067 kW. The energy savings is then only 533 kW, which is the net mount of power that the utility can convert to other uses. Clearly then, the need for power factors close to unity is apparent. Another factor that directly influences the amount of power (apparent VA) that needs to be delivered to a given load is the total harmonic distortion of the current waveform supplying the device. True power factor is adversely affected by current or voltage distortion, and the significance of this influence is only now being widely accepted. There is shown in the
Harmonic distortion or deviation from true sinusoidal wave forms not only gives rise to further wasted energy, but increases the electromagnetic interference potential of the load. Radiated and conducted interference is a concern because of the interference potential with other services (radio communications for example).
Harmonic distortion is becoming more prevalent in power supplies as these devices are converted from inefficient linear operation to far more efficient switchmode operation. A wide variety of circuit topologies are used in modern switching power supplies such as thyristor and triac phase control, or bipolar or field effect transistor switches. A consequence of these solid state approaches is increased harmonic distortion and poor power factor behavior. In order to mitigate these problems, several approaches to power factor and distortion control have been developed that operate with and use the efficiency of the switchmode power supply itself. That is, instead of correcting for power factor in a separate functional device (that is connected between the power supply and line), the power factor and distortion correcting function is part of the switchmode power supply. A number of manufacturers of integrated circuits (Linear Technology, Silicon General, Motorola and Unitrode for example) offer monolithic devices that perform the power factor and distortion control function. A review of this art is presented in Power Supply Cookbook by Marty Brown, 1994, Butterworth-Heinemann.
The present invention concerns an apparatus for supplying regulated voltage d.c. electrical power to an LED array. The apparatus includes a rectifier having an input and an output, the rectifier being responsive to a.c power at the input for generating rectified d.c. power at the output, a power factor correction converter having an input connected to the rectifier output and an output, the power factor correction converter being responsive to the rectified d.c. power at the power factor correction converter input for generating regulated voltage, d.c. power at the power factor correction converter output, and an LED array having an input connected to the power factor correction converter output for receiving the d.c. power to illuminate the LED array. The power factor correction converter can be a power factor correcting and voltage regulating buck/boost switchmode converter.
A primary object of the present invention is to provide a power factor correcting, (boost buck/boost or buck) switchmode converter to power a line operated LED signal.
Another object of the present invention is to use the inherent pulse modulating nature of a switchmode power supply to provide voltage regulation to an LED array.
The apparatus according to the present invention also includes an adaptive clamp circuit connected to the rectifier input for eliminating leakage current problems. The adaptive clamp circuit has an input adapted to be connected to a pair of a.c. power lines, a pair of clamp circuit output lines connected to the adaptive clamp circuit input, a voltage sensing means connected across the adaptive clamp circuit input, and a controlled load means connected across the clamp circuit output lines and to the voltage sensing means. The voltage sensing means is responsive to a magnitude of a.c. voltage at the adaptive clamp circuit input lower than a predetermined magnitude for turning on the controlled load means to connect a low impedance load in the controlled load means across the clamp circuit output lines and the voltage sensing means is responsive to a magnitude of the a.c. voltage at the adaptive clamp circuit input equal to or greater than the predetermined magnitude for turning off the controlled load means to disconnect the low impedance load from the clamp circuit output lines.
It is also an objective of the present invention to eliminate leakage current problems by providing an adaptive clamp circuit.
Another feature of the present invention is to provide an adaptive line loading means or clamp that switches itself in or out of the circuit as needed.
The apparatus according to the present invention further includes a battery backup system having an input for receiving a.c. power applied to the rectifier input and having an output at which d.c. power is generated, and a switch-over relay connected to the battery backup system output and to the rectifier input, the battery backup system being responsive to a failure of a.c. power at the battery backup system input for controlling the switch-over relay to connect the battery backup system output to the rectifier input to provide d.c. power to illuminate the LED array and being responsive to a.c. power at the battery backup system input for controlling the switch-over relay to disconnect the battery backup system output from the rectifier input.
Another object of the present invention is the use of a d.c. power supply (instead of the a.c. power line) as a power backup that is activated upon a.c. power line loss.
The above, as well as other advantages of the present invention, will become readily apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of a preferred embodiment when considered in the light of the accompanying drawings in which:
As noted above, the elementary power supplies that are currently used for powering LED array signals do not meet current standards for efficiency, reliability and performance. The unregulated, resistively ballasted power supply shown in the
The use of capacitors as non-dissipative current limiters in a.c. circuits is well established, and is shown in the
There is shown in the
The power supply 10 has a pair of power input lines 22 for connection to a source (not shown) of a.c. power such as main power lines at a nominal 120 volts a.c. An input of an adaptive clamp circuit 24 can be connected to the lines 22 as an option. A problem peculiar to signals that are switched by means of solid state relays is the leakage current that can flow through the load when the solid state switch or relay is “OFF”. This phenomenon is common to triac and thyristor switches that are commonly employed in traffic signal controllers. While not apparent when incandescent signals are employed (because they are low impedance loads), the problems surface when relatively low power loads (such as LEDs) are connected to these same controllers. Typically, other safety devices used in traffic signal controllers such as conflict monitors must be “tricked” to reduce this leakage current. Commonly, a large capacitor is placed across the a.c. input leads to the LED load, in order to absorb the leakage current reactively. Of course, such provisions only aggravate the power factor problems.
An output of the adaptive clamp circuit 24 is connected by a pair of clamp circuit output lines 26 to an input of an electromagnetic interference (E.M.I.) filter 28. The E.M.I. filter 28 keeps conducted interference from feeding back into the power lines where it might cause problems to other circuitry on the line. An output of the filter 28 is connected by a pair of filter output lines 30 to an input of a rectifier means 32 which converts the incoming a.c. power to a pulsing d.c. power generated on a positive polarity rectifier output line 34 and a negative polarity rectifier output line 36. Although the rectifier means is shown as a full wave diode bridge rectifier, any type of rectifier can be used. The lines 34 and 36 are connected to an input of a power factor correction, buck/boost converter 38. The converter 38 includes a power factor correction (P.F.C.) integrated circuit (I.C.) controller 40, which is a commercial device available from many sources and functions by allowing current to charge a storage capacitor C (LARGE) only in phase with the rectified a.c. voltage thereby assuring a power factor close to unity. The control I.C. 40 also provides voltage regulation in the switchmode buck/boost converter by monitoring the output voltage and adjusting the high frequency on-off switching period of the pass element commensurately. Although a buck/boost converter is diagrammed, buck or boost topologies are also possible. Voltage output and current-mode control techniques are the primary differences in the various geometries, but these details are incidental to the functionality of the circuit.
A positive polarity output of the converter 38 is connected by a positive polarity converter output line 42 to the first input line 18 of the LED array 12. A negative polarity output of the converter 38 is connected by a negative polarity convener output line 44 to the second input line 20 of the LED array 12 through an optional pulse width modulated (P.W.M.) modulator 46.
The output voltage from the P.F.C. switch mode converter 38 is either fed directly to the LED array 12, or alternatively through the P.W.M. modulator 46. Such pulse modulation has been shown to be advantageous in certain LED signal applications. The functions of the switchmode P.F.C. converter 38 as the off line power supply are the same irrespective of the load. The obvious advantage of using a switching, voltage regulated power supply is efficiency. Line isolation, which is generally not provided by this transformerless design, is generally unnecessary for insulated LED signals, but a high frequency transformer could be incorporated. The intrinsic power factor correction provided by using the switchmode converter 38 in conjunction with the P.F.C. integrated circuit controller 40 is not only cost effective, but allows d.c. backup power to be used in case of line failure.
A primary aspect of the present invention is the use of a power factor correcting, (boost, buck/boost or buck) switchmode converter to power a line operated LED array signal 12. Another function of the present invention is to use the inherent pulse modulating nature of the switchmode power supply to provide voltage regulation to the LED array signal 12. Instead of using dissipative (heat producing) linear regulators for either voltage or current (to accommodate line voltage variations), the power factor and distortion controlling switchmode power supply 10 is used as an efficient voltage regulator. That is, the LED array 12, consisting of a large number of series-parallel connected LED devices 14, can be kept at essentially constant luminosity over a substantial range of input voltages. In actual practice, the output of such LED array signals has been kept within ±10% of nominal value over a power line variation of 85 volts to 140 volts (for a nominal 120 v.a.c. line).
It is also an objective of the present invention to eliminate leakage current problems by providing the adaptive clamp circuit 24 which is shown in more detail in the
The adaptive clamp circuit 24 is shown in more detail in the
The optional adaptive clamping circuit 24 is advantageously placed across the input terminals of the p.f.c., switchmode power supply 10 as shown in the FIG. 5. As noted above, as a consequence of using solid state relays or switches in signal controllers, the power to the signals is not fully disconnected (even when the signal should be off). This leakage current often causes problems with safety devices such as electronic conflict monitors. Additionally, these leakage currents may present problems during flashing operation of LED signals, as the power supply circuits may not be fully discharged between flashes. Switchmode, p.f.c. power suppliers of the type proposed for the present invention are particularly sensitive to such leakage currents and will be inhibited from flashing LEDs at an acceptable rate (55 to 60 flashes per minute).
In current practice, these leakage currents are minimized by “short circuiting” them by means of a reactive, non dissipative element. The input capacitor (typically 1-2 μF), as shown in the
Another feature of the present invention is to provide for an adaptive line loading means or clamp that switches itself in or out of circuit as needed. As shown in the
This adaptive clamp 24 can of course be used with other types of power supplies where the addition of reactive elements could degrade the power factor. The clamping circuit 24 works by using the sensing transistor Q1 and the Zener diode D5 (the voltage sensing means 48 of the
Another aspect of the present invention is the use of a d.c. input (instead of the a.c. power line) as a power backup feature that is activated upon power line loss. Conventional practice employs battery driven a.c. inverters to generate the backup power upon line failure. Such inverters are expensive, inefficient and are failure prone. The use of battery power (d.c.) to directly energize the regulated switchmode power supply that powers the LED array signal is very cost effective and energy efficient. The wide input voltage range of most switchmode power supplies allows the batteries to be used optimally as they can be virtually fully discharged in the power backup cycle yielding very good use of battery capacity. Lower cost, smaller batteries are therefore useable.
As noted previously, the use of a direct line operated, non-transformer isolated converter to power the LED array signal allows d.c. power to be used (instead of a.c.) in case of line failure. Using batteries without having to rely on an inverter to perform the d.c. to a.c. conversion is novel, extremely reliable, and cost effective. The importance of battery backup for critical traffic signals is obvious, and the need for reliability is also apparent. As shown in the
Because of the critical safety nature of these devices, an automatic battery testing circuit and load 68 is built into the battery backup system 62. Deterioration of the battery 66, which is inevitable ova time, is thereby monitored and degradation past a certain point is nagged or announced. The testing circuit 68 has an input connected to an output of the battery 66 for sensing battery voltage. An alarm signal line 70 is connected to an output of the circuit 68 for generating the alarm signal and a set flag signal line 72 is connected to another output of the circuit 68 for generating the set flag signal. A control line 74 is connected between an output of the circuit 68 and an input of the battery 66. Secondary batteries that are kept in float service for any length of time tend to degrade and loose capacity. This deterioration is far more apparent in high temperature environments, and can adversely affect the safety margins of the backup power supply. That is. instead of providing 8 to 10 hours of flashing red LED array signal backup service, a degraded battery might only last a few hours. Determining the actual condition or serviceability of a storage battery is difficult, because a measurement of terminal voltage does not necessarily indicate loss of capacity. It has been experimentally determined that a good measure of battery capacity can be made by loading the battery with a substantial current (typically 5-10 amperes) for several minutes and measuring the terminal voltage under load. Naturally the battery charger is inhibited during this test. This method is well recognized as a good diagnostic test as it depletes any “surface charge” on the electrodes and more accurately indicates remaining battery ampere-hours.
A voltage comparator circuit in the battery testing circuit and load 68 establishes an “accept” or “reject” level for the battery 66 as it is tested every 24 hours or so. In order to accommodate partly discharged cells, two sequential, battery tests that result in a “reject” are registered in a latch which may trigger a visual or audible alarm signal on the line 70. Alternatively, a relay or contact closure (flag) may be set to generate a signal on the line 72 so that a data modem can relay the degraded battery information to a central service facility. Of course, such calls or alarm signals are triggered well before the battery is no longer serviceable so that safety is not comprised.
A line failure detection circuit 76 has an input connected to the power lines 22 and another input connected to an output of the battery 66 to receive operating power from the battery. The circuit 76 initiates the power switch-over process whenever a.c. input power is disconnected. An output of the line failure detection circuit 76 is connected to an input of a time delay and restoration circuit 78 which has another input connected to an output of the battery 66 to receive operating power from the battery. The time delay function ensures that short, transient line dropouts are disregarded. An output of the time delay and restoration circuit 78 is connected to an input of a d.c. power switch-over and flasher circuit 80 which has another input connected to an output of the battery 66 to receive operating power from the battery. Outputs of the circuit 80 are connected to a first set of input terminals of a switch-over relay 82. The relay has a second set of terminals connected to red signal outputs of a traffic controller 84 having an input connected to the power lines 22. Output terminals of the switch-over relay 82 are connected to the input of the switchmode converter power supply 10 which is connected to the red LED array signal 12. Normally, the switch-over relay 82 is in the position shown to connect a.c. power on the lines 22 through the traffic controller 84 to the power supply 10.
Generally, line loss in excess of 250 msec will cause the d.c. power switch-over relay 82 to switch the output terminals to disconnect the power supply 10 and the red LED array signal 10 from the traffic controller 84 (and the a.c. feed) and connect them to the d.c. battery 66 through the d.c. power switch-over and flasher circuit 80. Note that the d.c. supply is flashed or pulsed by the circuit 80 at a nominal rate of 60 pulses per minute (1 Hz) to place all the red LED array signals at an intersection in a flashing mode, effecting a four way stop. While an electromechanical switch-over relay 82 is shown for complete isolation of the existing traffic controller 84 and the battery backup system 62, solid state devices could be used.
Whenever the line power is restored, the time delay and restoration circuit 78 will wait some period (typically 10-15 seconds) before the LED array signal 12 is switched back to the a.c. power mode. This delay avoids the many transients that usually accompany a.c. line restoration after a power outage. Note that no inverter is employed in this system, as is common practice in existing commercial hardware. The inefficiency and poor reliability of d.c. to a.c. converters is thereby avoided. Because the switchmode power supply 10 can accommodate wide variations in input voltage (both a.c. and d.c.) the storage battery 66 can be discharged virtually completely while maintaining essentially constant luminosity of the LED array signal 12.
Additionally, as shown in the
As noted above, the lack of input transformers or series capacitors before the full wave bridge, allows d.c. power to be applied at the input terminals of the power supply 10 in lieu of a.c. power. Since there are no reactive (a.c.) components in the input circuitry, proper operation of the switchmode converter is maintained, and output voltage regulation is still available. Obviously, the p.f.c. portion of the circuit 10 will be nonfunctional during operation on d.c. input power. As shown, the switchmode convener will provide an essentially constant output voltage (nom. 100 volts d.c.) to the LED array 12 over a range of a.c. input voltages from 85 volts r.m.s. to 140 volts r.m.s. and over a d.c. input voltage range of 38 volts d.c. to 65 volts d.c. The wide (input voltage) operating range allows rechargeable batteries to be used very efficiently, since their capacity can be fully utilized in the discharge cycle, as their terminal voltage drops.
As discussed above, LED signals are being used to replace incandescent lamps in many applications. Traffic signals are among the more common devices that are being upgraded for with LEDs because of the tremendous power savings and the dramatic improvement in service life. In most cases the incandescent lamps are merely replaced with an integral LED retrofit assembly that does not require any modification of the existing traffic signal housing or the drive and control circuitry associated with the signal. That is, users expect the LED retrofit lamps to operate normally without added modifications to the housing or traffic controller.
One aspect of this conversion to LED signals from incandescent lamps poses significant problems however. Many existing incandescent lamp traffic signals are dimmed at night to reduce glare and, of course, power consumption. LED signals can be dimmed by reducing the average current through the LED array. A problem arises however because existing traffic signal controllers dim incandescent signals by providing half-wave rectified a.c. to the devices. Normally the traffic lamps are powered by switched a.c. line power which has, in virtually all cases, a sinusoidal wave form. Simply rectifying this power allows the traffic signal controller to reduce the average voltage and current to the load in a loss free manner. This technique has been in common use for many years and has become the “defacto” standard dimming technique.
Most LED traffic signals do not work satisfactorily with half wave rectified a.c.; in fact, many simply do not light. Some LED lamp arrays which are equipped with regulated power supplies will illuminate satisfactorily when powered by half wave rectified a.c. current, but they do not dim. The regulated power supplies accept the half wave rectified a.c. line power and treat it merely as a low line voltage and correct for this phenomenon. The voltage impressed across the LED array is kept relatively constant in spite of such input voltage variations thereby keeping the LED luminous output essentially unchanged, i.e. undimmed.
Certain switchmode, regulating power supplies are able to power LED signals satisfactorily from even half wave rectified a.c. power supplies. A half wave detector circuit in the LED signal power supply can determine whether the traffic signal controller is sending a “dimming” command. Upon detection of this half wave signal, the switchmode power supply can be programmed or adjusted to reduce its output voltage to the LED array. By adjusting either the pulse width or the frequency (at constant pulse width) of the switchmode power supply, the output voltage (and/or current) can be reduced in an efficient, nondissipative manner.
Alternatively, the half wave detector can be used to change the average current through the LED array by reducing the effective pulse width of a pulse width modulation controller that drives the LEDs. In either method, the average LED current and intensity are reduced in response to the detection of a half wave rectified input current. In this way, the LED signal is “transparent” to the user who may now utilize the LED device in the same manner as conventional incandescent signals.
As shown in the
All such dimming methods have one key feature in common; the average current through the LED signal 12 is decreased in response to the detection of a half wave dimming signal impressed on the power supply input lines 22. The detection of half wave power by the detector 88 causes the LED power supply 10 to either adjust the output pulse width at constant frequency or adjust the frequency at constant pulse width. The power supply 10 can be any type of power supply which converts a.c. power to d.c. power suitable for illuminating the LED array 12.
The present invention is an apparatus 10 for supplying regulated voltage d.c. electrical power to an LED array including a rectifier means 32 having an input and an output, the rectifier means 32 being responsive to a.c. power at the input for generating rectified d.c. power at the output, a power factor correction converter means 38 having an input connected to the rectifier means 32 output and an output, the power factor correction converter means 38 being responsive to the rectified d.c. power at the power factor correction converter means input for generating regulated voltage, power factor corrected d.c. power at the power factor correction converter means output, and an LED array 12 having an input connected to the power factor correction converter means 38 output for receiving the power factor corrected d.c. power to illuminate the LED array 12. The power factor correction converter means 38 can be a power factor correcting and voltage regulating buck/boost switchmode converter.
The apparatus 10 includes a pulse width modulated modulator means 46 connected to the power factor correction converter means 38 output and the LED array 12 input for modulating the power factor corrected d.c. power and an electromagnetic interference filter means 28 connected to the full wave rectifier means 32 input for preventing conducted interference from feeding back onto a.c. power lines 22 connected to the rectifier means 32 input. The apparatus 10 also includes an adaptive clamp circuit means 24 connected to the rectifier means 32 input for eliminating leakage current problems. The adaptive clamp circuit means 24 has an input adapted to be connected to a pair of a.c. power lines 22, a pair of clamp circuit output lines 26 connected to the adaptive clamp circuit means 24 input, a voltage sensing means 48 connected across the adaptive clamp circuit means 24 input, and a controlled load means 50 connected across the clamp circuit output lines 26 and to the voltage sensing means 48. The voltage sensing means 48 is responsive to a magnitude of a.c. voltage at the adaptive clamp circuit means 24 input lower than a predetermined magnitude for turning on the controlled load means 50 to connect a low impedance load 60 in the controlled load means 50 across the clamp circuit output lines 26 and the voltage sensing means 48 is responsive to a magnitude of the a.c. voltage at the adaptive clamp circuit means 24 input equal to or greater than the predetermined magnitude for turning off the controlled load means 50 to disconnect the low impedance load 60 from the clamp circuit output lines 26.
The apparatus 10 further includes a battery backup means 62 having an input for receiving a.c. power applied to the rectifier means 32 input and having an output at which d.c. power is generated, and a switch-over means 82 connected to the battery backup means 62 output and to the rectifier means 32 input, the battery backup means 62 being responsive to a failure of a.c. power at the battery backup means 62 input for controlling the switch-over means 82 to connect the battery backup means 62 output to the rectifier means 32 input to provide d.c. power to illuminate the LED array 12 and being responsive to a.c. power at the battery backup means 62 input for controlling the switch-over means 82 to disconnect the battery backup means 62 output from the rectifier means 32 input. The switch-over means 82 can be an electromechanical relay. The battery backup means 62 includes a time delay and restoration means 78 responsive to application of a.c. power at the battery backup means 62 input for controlling the switch-over means 82 to disconnect the battery backup means 62 output from the rectifier means 32 input and connect the a.c. power to the rectifier means 32 input after a predetermined time delay. The battery backup means 62 also includes a d.c. power switch-over and flasher means 80 connected to the switch-over means 82 for pulsing the d.c. power at a predetermined rate to flash the LED array 12 and a synchronizing pulse generator means 86 connected to the d.c. power switch-over and flasher means 80 for imposing marker pulses on the d.c. power at a predetermined rate.
The apparatus 10 also includes a half wave power detector means 88 having an input connected to the input of the rectifier means 32 and an output connected to another input of the power factor correction converter means 38, the half wave power detector means being responsive to a dimming signal at the rectifier means input for generating a control signal at said half wave power detector means output and the power factor correction converter means 38 being responsive to the control signal for decreasing the regulated d.c. power to dim the LED array 12. If the apparatus 10 includes the pulse width modulated modulator means 46 connected to the power factor correction converter means 38 output and the LED array 12 input for modulating the regulated voltage d.c. power, the half wave power detector means 88 has its output connected to an input of the pulse width modulated modulator means 46 and is responsive to a dimming signal at the rectifier means input for generating a control signal at the half wave power detector means output and the pulse width modulated modulator means 46 is responsive to the control signal for decreasing the regulated d.c. power to dim the LED array 12.
In accordance with the provisions of the patent statutes, the present invention has been described in what is considered to represent its preferred embodiment. However, it should be noted that the invention can be practiced otherwise than as specifically illustrated and described without departing from its spirit or scope.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US1662348||Sep 12, 1925||Mar 13, 1928||Stricker George W||Changeable sign and traffic signal|
|US2503574||May 6, 1947||Apr 11, 1950||Walkolite Company Inc||Combined pedestrian traffic signal and advertising device|
|US3421009||Jun 14, 1966||Jan 7, 1969||Caruthers Felix P||Temperature compensated photosensor system|
|US3456155||Apr 30, 1965||Jul 15, 1969||Advance Data Systems Corp||Photosensitive circuit for controlling the intensity of a lamp|
|US3473084||Dec 6, 1967||Oct 14, 1969||Automatic Power Inc||Constant intensity lamp control with an optical feedback control|
|US3500455||Jul 5, 1968||Mar 10, 1970||Minnesota Mining & Mfg||Light responsive electrical lamp dimming means|
|US3611177||May 16, 1969||Oct 5, 1971||Energy Conversion Devices Inc||Electroluminescent relaxation oscillator for dc operation|
|US3670202||Jul 31, 1970||Jun 13, 1972||Nasa||Ultrastable calibrated light source|
|US3705316||Dec 27, 1971||Dec 5, 1972||Nasa||Temperature compensated light source using a light emitting diode|
|US3787752||Jul 28, 1972||Jan 22, 1974||Us Navy||Intensity control for light-emitting diode display|
|US3872301||Mar 15, 1974||Mar 18, 1975||Schwarzer Gmbh Fritz||Automatically temperature-compensated electro-optic circuit|
|US3873905||Mar 18, 1974||Mar 25, 1975||Ltv Aerospace Corp||Control circuit to provide shunt path for leakage current|
|US3952242||Jun 30, 1972||Apr 20, 1976||Ricoh Co., Ltd.||Automatic voltage regulator with optical feedback|
|US3959711||Dec 9, 1974||May 25, 1976||Technology Development Corporation||Pulse width modulated power supplies|
|US4001637||Jun 12, 1975||Jan 4, 1977||Lutron Electronics Co., Inc.||Lamp ballast|
|US4012686||Mar 18, 1971||Mar 15, 1977||Optotechnik, Gmbh||Power supply for illuminated instrument|
|US4037271||Dec 3, 1976||Jul 19, 1977||Boschert Associates||Switching regulator power supply|
|US4052644||Mar 15, 1976||Oct 4, 1977||Rollei-Werke Franke & Heidecke||Electronic flash unit with operational signal|
|US4090189||May 20, 1976||May 16, 1978||General Electric Company||Brightness control circuit for LED displays|
|US4101808||Sep 30, 1975||Jul 18, 1978||Bell & Howell Company||Lamp control circuit|
|US4109307||May 4, 1977||Aug 22, 1978||Gte Sylvania Incorporated||High power factor conversion circuitry|
|US4135116||Jan 16, 1978||Jan 16, 1979||The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy||Constant illumination control system|
|US4182977||Jun 1, 1978||Jan 8, 1980||Trw Inc.||Constant output light emitting device|
|US4190795||Sep 9, 1977||Feb 26, 1980||Coberly & Associates||Constant intensity light source|
|US4190836||Nov 2, 1977||Feb 26, 1980||Hitachi, Ltd.||Dynamic drive circuit for light-emitting diodes|
|US4211955||Mar 2, 1978||Jul 8, 1980||Ray Stephen W||Solid state lamp|
|US4238707||Jan 10, 1979||Dec 9, 1980||Thomson-Csf||Power supply system for a semiconductor light source|
|US4247854||May 9, 1979||Jan 27, 1981||Ncr Corporation||Gas panel with improved circuit for display operation|
|US4275335||Mar 26, 1980||Jun 23, 1981||Minolta Camera Kabushiki Kaisha||Constant light intensity electronic flash device|
|US4298869||Jun 25, 1979||Nov 3, 1981||Zaidan Hojin Handotai Kenkyu Shinkokai||Light-emitting diode display|
|US4319164||Feb 20, 1981||Mar 9, 1982||Midland-Ross Corporation||Power factor compensating electroluminescent lamp DC/AC inverter|
|US4323895||Apr 24, 1980||Apr 6, 1982||Regie Nationale Des Usines Renault||Display device for dashboard of automobile|
|US4329625||Jul 17, 1979||May 11, 1982||Zaidan Hojin Handotai Kenkyu Shinkokai||Light-responsive light-emitting diode display|
|US4342947||Jul 7, 1980||Aug 3, 1982||Bloyd Jon A||Light indicating system having light emitting diodes and power reduction circuit|
|US4347461||Oct 23, 1980||Aug 31, 1982||Robert L. Elving||Incident illumination responsive light control|
|US4367464||May 29, 1980||Jan 4, 1983||Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha||Large scale display panel apparatus|
|US4386281||Jan 15, 1981||May 31, 1983||Mostek Corporation||Circuit for detecting loss of supply voltage|
|US4388578||Jul 7, 1980||Jun 14, 1983||Cynex Manufacturing Corporation||Power factor controller|
|US4423478||Jul 20, 1981||Dec 27, 1983||Xerox Corporation||Phase controlled regulated power supply|
|US4467246||Aug 20, 1981||Aug 21, 1984||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Light quantity controller and input device|
|US4492899||May 23, 1983||Jan 8, 1985||Indicator Controls Corporation||Solid state regulated power supply system for cold cathode luminous tube|
|US4495445||Jun 6, 1983||Jan 22, 1985||General Electric Company||Brightness control for a vacuum fluorescent display|
|US4568857 *||Nov 3, 1983||Feb 4, 1986||Honeywell Ltd.||Fluorescent light controller|
|US4571506||Mar 28, 1984||Feb 18, 1986||At&T Bell Laboratories||LED Driver Circuit|
|US4581655||Mar 30, 1984||Apr 8, 1986||Toshiba Denzai Kabushiki Kaisha||Video display apparatus|
|US4587459||Dec 27, 1983||May 6, 1986||Blake Frederick H||Light-sensing, light fixture control system|
|US4598198||May 21, 1984||Jul 1, 1986||Banner Engineering Corp.||Automatic power control for modulated LED photoelectric devices|
|US4645997||Mar 13, 1985||Feb 24, 1987||Kollmorgen Technologies Corporation||Transient free solid state automatic power factor correction|
|US4656365||Jul 12, 1985||Apr 7, 1987||Westinghouse Electric Corp.||Solid state power controller leakage current shunt circuit|
|US4673865||Apr 4, 1986||Jun 16, 1987||Motorola, Inc.||Charge coupled LED driver circuit|
|US4677366||May 12, 1986||Jun 30, 1987||Pioneer Research, Inc.||Unity power factor power supply|
|US4712000||Oct 17, 1984||Dec 8, 1987||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Rotary encoder with source-adjacent light sampling and control|
|US4717868||Jun 11, 1986||Jan 5, 1988||American Microsystems, Inc.||Uniform intensity led driver circuit|
|US4719552||Nov 14, 1986||Jan 12, 1988||U.S. Philips Corporation||AC-DC converter triggered by variable frequency pulses|
|US4729076||Nov 15, 1984||Mar 1, 1988||Tsuzawa Masami||Signal light unit having heat dissipating function|
|US4825351||Nov 24, 1987||Apr 25, 1989||Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba||AC-DC converting apparatus having power factor improving circuit utilizing a photocoupler|
|US4837495||Oct 13, 1987||Jun 6, 1989||Astec U.S.A. (Hk) Limited||Current mode converter with controlled slope compensation|
|US4845489||Dec 23, 1985||Jul 4, 1989||Chrysler Motors Corporation||Electroluminescent display drive circuitry|
|US4849683||Dec 7, 1988||Jul 18, 1989||Motorola, Inc.||Lamp driver circuit with controlled power over a range of power supply voltages|
|US4855890||Oct 27, 1988||Aug 8, 1989||Reliance Comm/Tec Corporation||Power factor correction circuit|
|US4868669||Jul 29, 1987||Sep 19, 1989||Ricoh Company, Ltd.||Integrated input/output device|
|US4891569||Aug 20, 1982||Jan 2, 1990||Versatex Industries||Power factor controller|
|US4902936||May 30, 1989||Feb 20, 1990||Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha||Light adjusting apparatus|
|US4929871||Sep 28, 1987||May 29, 1990||Gerfast Sten R||Transformerless current-limiting circuit|
|US4933605||Jan 19, 1988||Jun 12, 1990||Etta Industries, Inc.||Fluorescent dimming ballast utilizing a resonant sine wave power converter|
|US4943902||Sep 25, 1989||Jul 24, 1990||Viteq Corporation||AC to DC power converter and method with integrated line current control for improving power factor|
|US4954822||Sep 2, 1988||Sep 4, 1990||Arnold Borenstein||Traffic signal using light-emitting diodes|
|US4958108||Feb 14, 1989||Sep 18, 1990||Avtech Corporation||Universal fluorescent lamp ballast|
|US4969282||Dec 2, 1988||Nov 13, 1990||Eberhart Wolfgang R||Glass block illuminated display|
|US4970437||Jul 10, 1989||Nov 13, 1990||Motorola Lighting, Inc.||Chopper for conventional ballast system|
|US4974141||Aug 15, 1989||Nov 27, 1990||Viteq Corporation||AC to DC power converter with input current waveform control for buck-boost regualtion of output|
|US4980812||Nov 9, 1989||Dec 25, 1990||Exide Electronics||Uninterrupted power supply system having improved power factor correction circuit|
|US4982139||Apr 3, 1989||Jan 1, 1991||At&T Bell Laboratories||Method and apparatus for controlling light intensity|
|US4988889||Jul 3, 1989||Jan 29, 1991||Self-Powered Lighting, Inc.||Power source for emergency lighting systems|
|US5001620||Jul 25, 1989||Mar 19, 1991||Astec International Limited||Power factor improvement|
|US5003454||Jan 9, 1990||Mar 26, 1991||North American Philips Corporation||Power supply with improved power factor correction|
|US5004947||Oct 31, 1989||Apr 2, 1991||Nilssen Ole K||Fluorescent lamp ballast with high power factor|
|US5006975||Nov 3, 1989||Apr 9, 1991||Cherry Semiconductor Corporation||Power factor correction circuit|
|US5008599||Feb 14, 1990||Apr 16, 1991||Usi Lighting, Inc.||Power factor correction circuit|
|US5012161||Jan 5, 1989||Apr 30, 1991||General Electric Company||Power factor correction circuit|
|US5012162||Apr 13, 1990||Apr 30, 1991||Unisys Corporation||Light emitting diode transmitter circuit with temperature compensation|
|US5019952||Nov 20, 1989||May 28, 1991||General Electric Company||AC to DC power conversion circuit with low harmonic distortion|
|US5023521||Dec 18, 1989||Jun 11, 1991||Radionic Industries, Inc.||Lamp ballast system|
|US5030887||Jan 29, 1990||Jul 9, 1991||Guisinger John E||High frequency fluorescent lamp exciter|
|US5041766||Sep 11, 1989||Aug 20, 1991||Ole K. Nilssen||Power-factor-controlled electronic ballast|
|US5045758||Apr 25, 1990||Sep 3, 1991||Hildebrand Cleve R||Solid state regulated power supply for luminescent lamp|
|US5047912||Mar 9, 1990||Sep 10, 1991||International Rectifier Corporation||Four-terminal unity power factor electronic rectifier|
|US5048033||Sep 4, 1990||Sep 10, 1991||Coherent, Inc.||Method and apparatus for controlling the power supply of a laser operating in a pulse mode|
|US5075601||Apr 25, 1990||Dec 24, 1991||Hildebrand Cleve R||Power supply dynamic load for traffic and pedestrian signal|
|US5089748||Jun 13, 1990||Feb 18, 1992||Delco Electronics Corporation||Photo-feedback drive system|
|US5095305||Aug 31, 1989||Mar 10, 1992||Toshiba Lighting & Technology Corporation||Large display apparatus using discharge lamps and discharge lamp load circuit for the large display apparatus|
|US5113337||Feb 8, 1991||May 12, 1992||General Electric Company||High power factor power supply|
|US5134345||Oct 31, 1991||Jul 28, 1992||General Electric Company||Feedback system for stabilizing the arc discharge of a high intensity discharge lamp|
|US5134355||Aug 6, 1991||Jul 28, 1992||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Power factor correction control for switch-mode power converters|
|US5135160||Aug 17, 1990||Aug 4, 1992||Opticon, Inc.||Portable bar code reader utilizing pulsed LED array|
|US5146398||Aug 20, 1991||Sep 8, 1992||Led Corporation N.V.||Power factor correction device provided with a frequency and amplitude modulated boost converter|
|US5212428||Sep 25, 1991||May 18, 1993||Koito Manufacturing Co., Ltd.||Lighting circuit for vehicular discharge lamp|
|US5235504||Mar 15, 1991||Aug 10, 1993||Emerson Electric Co.||High power-factor converter for motor drives and power supplies|
|US5258692||Jun 2, 1992||Nov 2, 1993||Appliance Control Technology, Inc.||Electronic ballast high power factor for gaseous discharge lamps|
|US5272327||May 26, 1992||Dec 21, 1993||Compaq Computer Corporation||Constant brightness liquid crystal display backlight control system|
|US5446440 *||Jan 6, 1993||Aug 29, 1995||Lederlite Corporation||Emergency sign and control circuit|
|US5734229 *||Nov 29, 1995||Mar 31, 1998||Bavaro; Joseph P.||Back-up electrical system for portable table lamps|
|US5936599 *||May 13, 1998||Aug 10, 1999||Reymond; Welles||AC powered light emitting diode array circuits for use in traffic signal displays|
|1||"Hi-Flux LED Modules-433 Series Traffic Signals," Dialight Specification Sheet, undated, http://www.dialight.com/pdf/TrafficSignals/MDTS433EXCAL001_A-W.pdf, last visited Oct. 12, 2006.|
|2||"Hi-Flux LED Modules—433 Series Traffic Signals," Dialight Specification Sheet, undated, http://www.dialight.com/pdf/TrafficSignals/MDTS433EXCAL001_A-W.pdf, last visited Oct. 12, 2006.|
|3||12'' LED Red Arrow Indication, by McCain Traffic Supply pp. 3-4.|
|4||12″ LED Red Arrow Indication, by McCain Traffic Supply pp. 3-4.|
|5||4.3 Transformer-Isolated Switching Power Supply Topologies, pp. E11549-E11550.|
|6||6th European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications, by EPE Association, vol. 2, Sep. 20, 1995. pp. 003211-003216.|
|7||8'' and 12'' LED Red Ball Indication, by McCain Traffic Supply pp. 5-6.|
|8||8″ and 12″ LED Red Ball Indication, by McCain Traffic Supply pp. 5-6.|
|9||A New Control Strategy to Achieve Sinusoidal Line Current in a Cascade Buck-Boost Converter, by Mohammed C. Ghanem et al., pp. E11435-E11445.|
|10||A New Very High Voltage Smartmos IC Combines Power Factor Control With Internation Off-Line Startup, pp. E11534-E11542.|
|11||Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaim Defendant, Excolux's Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint, Case No. 98-72360, Jul. 14, 1990.|
|12||Amended Answer, Affirmative Defenses, and Counterclaim of Defendant Precision Solar Controls Inc, Case No. 98-72360 dated Jul. 6, 1999.|
|13||Analog/Interace ICS, Device Data, vol. 1, Rev. 6, by Motorola, pp. 3-612-3-635.|
|14||Answer, Affirmative Defenses, and Counterclaim of Defendant Precision Solar Controls Inc dated Nov. 2, 1998.|
|15||Appeals From the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan in Case No. 98-CV-72360, Judge John Feikens dated Jan. 27, 2000.|
|16||Brief for Defendants-Cross-Appellants Lumileds Lighting BV, Phillips Lighting BV, and Hewlett Packard Company, dated May 1, 2000.|
|17||Compaint, Case No. 98-72360, filed Jun. 9, 1998.|
|18||Conducted Inteference Voltage of AC-DC Converters, pp. 203-210.|
|19||Conducted Interference voltage of AC-DC Converters, By M. Albach pp. 203-212.|
|20||Conducted Interference Voltage of AC-DC Converters, by M. Albach pp. E11446-E11455.|
|21||Defendant Dialight Corporation's Answer, Affirmative Defenses, and Counterclaims, dated Nov. 2, 1998.|
|22||Defendant Ecoulux's Answer to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaim, Case No. 98-72360.|
|23||Defendant Hewlett-Packard Company's Answer to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaim 98-723, dated Nov. 2, 1998.|
|24||Defendant Lumileds Lighting VB's Answer to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims, Case No. 98-723, dated Nov. 2, 1998.|
|25||Defendant Philips Lighting BV'S Answer to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaim, dated Nov. 2, 1998.|
|26||Defendant, Ecoulux, Inc.'s Answers to Plaintiff's Interrogatories No. 1-12, dated Feb. 1, 1999.|
|27||Design of Power Corrector for the Off-Line Isolated Buck/Boost Converter by a Voltage-Follower Techique, p. 959-964.|
|28||Design of Power Factor Corrector for the Off-Line Isolated Buck/Boost Converter by a Voltage-Follower Technique Power Factor Correction With the UC3854, by Unitrode Integrate Circuites pp. E11543-E11548.|
|29||Design of Power Factor Corrector for the Off-Line Isolated Buck/Boost Converter by a Voltage-Follower Technique, pp. 959-964.|
|30||Design Trade-Offs in Continuous Current-Mode Controlled Boost Power-Factor Correction Circuits, by Chen Zhou et al., pp. E11482-E11492.|
|31||Digitable Ubertragung Mit Lichtwellenleitern, Elekronik 14/1991, pp. 66-68.|
|32||Digital Displays, By R. Stephen, pp. 29 and 31.|
|33||Digital Feedback Light-Emitting Diode Control, by IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 16, No. 8 Jan. 1974, pp. 2598-2601.|
|34||Digital Feedback Light-Emitting Diode Control, By IBM, Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 16, No. 8, Jan. 1974, pp. E12064-E12067.|
|35||Enhanced High Power Factor Preregulator, by Unitrode Integrated Circuits, Dated May 1993, pp. 5-226-5-229.|
|36||Enhanced High Power Factor Preregulator, by Unitrode Integrated Circuits, pp. 6-295-6300.|
|37||Enhanced High Power Factor Preregulator, dated Jan. 1995, pp. 6-295 thru 6-300.|
|38||Enhanced High Power Factor Prereulator, by Unitrode Integrated Circuits Dated May 1993, pp. 5-226 thru 5-228.|
|39||Exhibits in Support of Relume's Opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity for Obviousness of Lumileds Lighting BV, Philips Lighting VB and the Hewlett-Packard Company, Case No. 98-72360.|
|40||File History for U.S. Patent: Vila-Masot et al., Patent No. 5,146,398 Issued: Sep. 8, 1992.|
|41||First Amended Complaint, Case No. 98-72360, filed Jul. 29, 1998.|
|42||Flyback Power Factor Controller, by Micro Linear, dated May 1997, pp. 8-43 thru 8-53.|
|43||High Frequency Power Conversion 1993 Conference by Harris Semiconductor, pp. E11523-E11533.|
|44||High Performance Power Factor Preregulator, By Unitrode Integrated Circuits, dated Nov. 1994, pp. 6-301 thru 6-306.|
|45||High Performance Power Factor Preregulator, dated Nov. 1994 pp. 6-301-6,-306.|
|46||High Power Factor Preregulator dated Oct. 1994 by Unitrode Integrated Circuits, pp. 6-287 thru 6-294.|
|47||High Power Factor Preregulator, by Unitrode Integrated Circuits, Dated Feb. 1993 pp. 5-218-5-225.|
|48||High Power Factor Preregulator, by Unitrode Integrated Circuits, dated Oct. 1994, pp. 6-287-6-294.|
|49||High Power Factor Preretulator, by Unitrode Integrated Circuits, dated Feb. 1993 pp. 5-218 thru5-225.|
|50||High Power Factor Switching Regulator With no Rush Current by Isao Takahashi and Ricardo Y. Igarashi, pp. E11427 and E11434.|
|51||High Power-Factor Preregulator, pp. E11477-E11481.|
|52||Improved Current Mode PWM Control, by Unitrode Integrated Circuits, dated Dec. 1992, pp. 5-229 thru 5-236.|
|53||Improved Current Mode PWM Controller, by Unitrode Integrated Circuits, Dated Dec. 1992, pp. 5-229-5-236.|
|54||Improved Current mode PWM Controller, dated Nov. 1994, pp. 6-307 thru 6-314.|
|55||Improved Current Mode PWM Controller, dated Nov. 1994, pp. 6-307-6-314.|
|56||Journal of Tsinghua University (Sci & Tech), dated 1997, pp. 89-92.|
|57||LED Driver and Pin Diode Receiver ICS for Digital Fiber Optic Communications, SPIE vol. 150 Laser & Fiber Optics Communications (1978) pp. 169-174.|
|58||LED Driver Output Level Control via Reflected Light Signal Sensing By IBM, Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 23 No. 6, Nov. 1980., pp. 2187-2188.|
|59||Lovell, B., et al., Lecture 12: 9E103 Electrical Physics and Electronics, University of Queensland, Nov. 5, 2000, http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/-engg1030/lectures/1perpage/lect12.pdf#search=%22lecture%2012%20transistor%22, last visited Oct. 12, 2006.|
|60||Memorandum of Law in Support of Lumileds Lighting BV, Philips Lighting BV, and the Hewlett-Packard Company's Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity for Obviousness, dated Apr. 6, 1999.|
|61||Methods of Temperature Stabilization of Light-Emitting Diode Radiation, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 65 (4), Apr. 1994, American Institute of Physics pp. 803-806.|
|62||Modeling and Simulation of a Digitally Controlled Active Rectifier for Power Conditioning, by Ray Hudson pp. E11470-E11476.|
|63||Motorola Semiconductor Technical Data, Power Factor Controllers pp. #11456-E11469.|
|64||Notice of Hearing, Case No. 98-72360, dated Feb. 4, 1999.|
|65||Objections and Responses of Lumileds Lighting BV, Philips Lighting BV, and Hewlett-Packard Company to Relume's Interrogatories Nos. 1-13, dated Feb. 2, 1999.|
|66||Original Declaration of Robert B. Erickson, pp. 1-9 dated Nov. 17, 1998.|
|67||Power Factor Controller, By Electronics World, Wireless World, date: Dec. 1993 pp. 1034-1035.|
|68||Power Factor Controllers, by Motorola, pp. 3-439-3-551.|
|69||Power Factor Correction With the UC3854, by Unitrode Integrated Circuites pp. E11512-E11522.|
|70||Power Factor Correction With the UC3854, by Unitrode Integrated Circuits, pp. 1-10.|
|71||Power Supply Cookbook, by Motorola, pp. 195-200.|
|72||Practical Switching Power Supply Design, By Marty Brown pp. E11407-E11426.|
|73||Precision Solar Controls Inc.'s Answers and Objections to Relume's Interrogatories to Defendants Nos. 1-12, dated Feb. 1, 1999.|
|74||Product & Application Handbook 1993-94 by Unitrode Integrated Circuits pp. 5-213 thru 5-217.|
|75||Product & Applications Handbook 1993-1994, by Unitrode Integrated Circuits, Dated Dec. 1992, pp. 5-213-5-217.|
|76||Product & Applications Handbook 1995-1996, by Unitrode Integrated Circuits Dated Oct. 1994, pp. 6-278 thru 6-286.|
|77||Product & Applications Handbook, 1995-96, by Unitrode Integrated Circuits.|
|78||PWM Controller Chip Fixes Power Factor, By Information Access Company, Date Jun. 8, 1989, pp. 2-4.|
|79||PWM Controller Chip Fixes Power Factor; Includes Related Articles on the ML4812 Power Factor Controller and on Reasons to Correct the Power Factor, by Information Access Company, dated Jun 8, 1989, pp. 1194011954.|
|80||Relume's Opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity for Obviousness of Lumileds Lighting BV, Philips Lighting BV, Philips Lighting BV and the Hewlett-Packard Company, dated Apr. 26, 1999.|
|81||Reply Brief in Support of Lumileds Lighting BV, Philips Ligthing BV, and the Hewlett-Packard Company's Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity for Obviousness, dated May 10, 1999.|
|82||Responses and Objections of Defendant Dialight Corporation to Plaintiff Relume Corporation's First Set of Interrogatories, dated Feb. 5, 1999.|
|83||Second Declaration of Dr. Robert W. Erickson, Ph.D., Case No. 98-72360 dated Feb. 4, 1999.|
|84||Single-Chip Controller Provides Power Factor Correction for 350W Supply, by Fernando Martin et al., pp. E11493-E11501.|
|85||Solid State Optical Designs Set the Encoder Pace, from Control Engineering May 1975 issue. pp. 40-43.|
|86||Special Masters Report, pp. 1-34 dated Jan. 10, 2002.|
|87||Supplemental Responses and Objections of Defendant Dialight Corporation to Plaintiff Relume Corporation 's First and Second Sets of Interrogatories dated ?31, 1999.|
|88||Supplemental Responses of Defendant Precision Solar Controls Inc. to Relume's Firs and Second Sets of Interrogatories dated Jun. 25, 1999 and 11, dated Apr. 30, 1999.|
|89||Supplemental Responses of Lumileds Lighting BV, Philips Lighting BV, and Hewlett-Packard Company to Relume's Interrogatories Nos. 1-7, 9 and 11, dated Apr. 30, 1999.|
|90||Supplemental Third Declaration of Dr. Robert B. Erickson, Ph.D. with Exhibit Tabs 25-34, dated May 9, 1999.|
|91||Switched Mode Power Supplies, By H.W. Whittington et al., pp. E11551-E11564.|
|92||Table Comparison of the Third and Supplemental Third Declarations of Erickson with the Lumiled's Memoranda, pp. 1-20.|
|93||The UC3823A, B & US3825A, B Enhanced Generation of PWM Controllers By Unitrode Integrated Circuits, pp. E11502-E11511.|
|94||Third Declaration of Dr. Robert B. Erickson, Ph.D. with Exhibit Tabs 1-15 dated Apr. 5, 1999.|
|95||Tri-Color LED Drive System, By IBM, Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 29, No. 1 Jun. 1986, pp. 320-321.|
|96||United States District Court Eastern District of Michigan Southern Division, Case No. 98-CV-72360, Opinion and Order dated Aug. 26, 1999.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US8134304 *||Dec 2, 2009||Mar 13, 2012||Novatek Microelectronics Corp.||Light source driving device capable of dynamically keeping constant current sink and related method|
|US8154223 *||Dec 1, 2009||Apr 10, 2012||Novatek Microelectronics Corp.||Driving apparatus of light emitting diode and driving method thereof|
|US8159155 *||Jul 21, 2008||Apr 17, 2012||Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.||Light emitting unit arrangement and control system and method thereof|
|US8288969 *||Feb 10, 2012||Oct 16, 2012||Novatek Microelectronics Corp.||Driving apparatus of light emitting diode and driving method thereof|
|US8427081 *||Jul 23, 2012||Apr 23, 2013||Novatek Microelectronics Corp.||Driving apparatus of light emitting diode and driving method thereof|
|US8807785||Jan 16, 2013||Aug 19, 2014||Ilumisys, Inc.||Electric shock resistant L.E.D. based light|
|US9072171||Aug 24, 2012||Jun 30, 2015||Ilumisys, Inc.||Circuit board mount for LED light|
|US9101026||Oct 28, 2013||Aug 4, 2015||Ilumisys, Inc.||Integration of LED lighting with building controls|
|US20100194293 *||Jul 21, 2008||Aug 5, 2010||Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.||Light emitting unit arrangement and control system and method thereof|
|US20110018450 *||Jan 27, 2011||Kuo-Ching Hsu||Light Source Driving Device Capable of Dynamically Keeping Constant Current Sink and Related Method|
|US20110062887 *||Dec 1, 2009||Mar 17, 2011||Novatek Microelectronics Corp.||Driving apparatus of light emitting diode and driving method thereof|
|US20120139434 *||Jun 7, 2012||Novatek Microelectronics Corp.||Driving apparatus of light emitting diode and driving method thereof|
|US20120286677 *||Nov 15, 2012||Novatek Microelectronics Corp.||Driving apparatus of light emitting diode and driving method thereof|
|U.S. Classification||363/89, 363/127, 323/282, 363/53|
|International Classification||H02M5/42, H05B33/08, H02J9/06, H02M1/42, H02M1/00|
|Cooperative Classification||H05B33/0848, H05B33/0887, H02M1/4208, H05B33/0842, Y02B70/126, H02J9/065|
|European Classification||H05B33/08D3, H02M1/42B, H05B33/08D3B2, H05B33/08D5C, H02J9/06C2|
|Jun 10, 2011||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: RELUME CORPORATION, MICHIGAN
Free format text: NUNC PRO TUNC ASSIGNMENT;ASSIGNOR:TRUSTEES OF THE RELUME CORPORATION UNDER AGREEMENT OF TRUST DATEDJULY 15, 2009;REEL/FRAME:026421/0913
Effective date: 20110607
|Feb 15, 2012||AS||Assignment|
Effective date: 20120213
Owner name: AGREEMENT AND DECLARATION OF TRUST DATED JUNE 1, 2
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:RELUME CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:027709/0308
|Jul 9, 2014||AS||Assignment|
Effective date: 20140509
Free format text: COURT ORDER;ASSIGNOR:RELUME CORPORATION TRUST;REEL/FRAME:033268/0814
Owner name: WELLS, III, CHARLES, TEE, MICHIGAN