|Publication number||USRE42425 E1|
|Application number||US 12/481,224|
|Publication date||Jun 7, 2011|
|Filing date||Jun 9, 2009|
|Priority date||May 12, 2005|
|Also published as||CA2608413A1, CA2608413C, CN101171885A, CN101171885B, EP1882396A2, EP1882396A4, US7242150, US20060255745, WO2006124278A2, WO2006124278A3|
|Publication number||12481224, 481224, US RE42425 E1, US RE42425E1, US-E1-RE42425, USRE42425 E1, USRE42425E1|
|Inventors||Stuart DeJonge, Russikesh Kumar|
|Original Assignee||Lutron Electronics Co., Inc.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (32), Referenced by (4), Classifications (8), Legal Events (1)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
The present invention relates to a two-wire load control device, specifically a two-wire dimmer for electronic low-voltage (ELV) lighting loads.
Low-voltage lighting, such as electronic low-voltage (ELV) and magnetic low-voltage (MLV) lighting, is becoming very popular. Low-voltage lamps allow for excellent, precise sources of illumination, extended lamp life, higher efficiencies than incandescent lamps, and unique lighting fixtures, such as track lighting. To power an electronic low-voltage lamp, an ELV transformer is required to reduce a line voltage (typically 120 VAC or 240 VAC) to a low-voltage level (such as 12 volts or 24 volts) to power the ELV lamp.
Many prior art two-wire dimmers exist for control of ELV lighting loads. A conventional two-wire dimmer has two connections: a “hot” connection to an alternating-current (AC) power supply and a “dimmed hot” connection to the lighting load. Standard dimmers use one or more semiconductor switches, such as triacs or field effect transistors (FETs), to control the current delivered to the lighting load and thus control the intensity of the light. The semiconductor switches are typically coupled between the hot and dimmed hot connections of the dimmer.
Since an ELV transformer is normally characterized by a large capacitance across the primary winding, the ELV lighting load is typically dimmed using reverse phase-control dimming (often called “trailing-edge” dimming), in which the dimmer includes two FETs in anti-serial connection. One FET conducts during the first, positive half-cycle of the AC waveform and the other FET conducts during the second, negative half-cycle of the AC waveform. The FETs are alternately turned on at the beginning of each half-cycle of the AC power supply and then turned off at some time during the half-cycle depending upon the desired intensity of the lamp. To execute reverse phase-control dimming, many ELV dimmers include a microprocessor to control the switching of the FETs.
In order to provide a direct-current (DC) voltage to power the microprocessor and other low-voltage circuitry, the dimmer includes a power supply, such as a cat-ear power supply. A cat-ear power supply draws current only near the zero-crossings of the AC waveforms and derives its name from the shape of the waveform of the current that it draws from the AC supply. The power supply must draw current through the connected ELV lighting load. The FETs must both be turned off (non-conducting) at the times when the power supply is charging. So, the FETs cannot be turned on for the entire length of a half-cycle, even when the maximum voltage across the load is desired.
To ensure that the power supply is able to draw enough current to maintain its output voltage at all times, the FETs are turned off at the end of each half-cycle for at least a minimum off-time. The proper operation of the ELV dimmer is constrained by a number of worst-case operating conditions, such as high current draw by the low-voltage circuitry, worst-case line voltage input (i.e. when the AC power supply voltage is lower than normal), and worst-case load conditions (such as the number and the wattage of the lamps, the types of ELV transformers, and variations in the operating characteristics of the ELV transformers). By considering these worst-case conditions, the minimum off-time is determined by calculating the off-time that will guarantee that the power supply will charge fully for even the worst-case conditions. The resulting off-time generally ends up being a large portion of each half-cycle and constrains the maximum light level of the attached load.
However, the worst-case condition is not normally encountered in practice, and under typical conditions, the FETs could normally be turned off for a shorter amount of time at the end of each half-cycle, thus conducting current to the load for a greater amount of time resulting in a higher intensity of the load that is closer to the intensity achieved when only a standard wall switch is connected in series with the load. Prior art dimmers have held the minimum off-time constant under all conditions, and thus, have suffered from a small dimming range.
Thus, there exists a need for an ELV dimmer that includes a power supply and has an increased dimming range. More specifically, there exists a need for an ELV dimmer that includes a power supply and is able to drive an ELV lighting load above the maximum dimming level of prior art ELV dimmers without compromising the operation of the power supply.
According to the present invention, a two-wire dimmer for control of a lighting load from a source of AC voltage includes a semiconductor switch, a power supply, and a control circuit. The semiconductor switch is operable to be coupled between the source of AC voltage and the lighting load and has a conducting state and a non-conducting state. The power supply has an input that receives an input voltage and is operable to draw current from the source of AC voltage during the non-conducting state of the semiconductor switch. The control circuit is operable to control the semiconductor switch into the conducting state for an on-time each half-cycle of the AC voltage and is coupled to the input of the power supply for monitoring the input voltage of the power supply. The control circuit is operable to decrease the on-time when the input voltage of the power supply falls below a first predetermined level. Further, the control circuit is operable to increase the on-time when the input voltage rises above a second predetermined level greater than the first level.
The foregoing summary, as well as the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments, is better understood when read in conjunction with the appended drawings. For the purposes of illustrating the invention, there is shown in the drawings an embodiment that is presently preferred, in which like numerals represent similar parts throughout the several views of the drawings, it being understood, however, that the invention is not limited to the specific methods and instrumentalities disclosed.
To control the AC voltage delivered to the ELV load 104, two field-effect transistors (FETs) 110, 112 are provided in anti-serial connection between the HOT terminal 106 and the DIMMED HOT terminal 108. The first FET 110 conducts during the positive half-cycle of the AC waveform and the second FET 112 conducts during the negative half-cycle of the AC waveform. ELV lighting loads are dimmed using reverse-phase control dimming, in which the FETs are alternately turned on at the beginning of each half-cycle of the AC power supply and then turned off at some time during the half-cycle depending upon the desired intensity of the lamp. The conduction state of the FETs 110, 112 is determined by a control circuit 114 that interfaces to the FETs through a gate drive circuit 116. To execute reverse-phase control dimming, the control circuit 114 includes a microprocessor to control the switching of the FETs 110, 112.
The ELV dimmer also includes a plurality of buttons 118 for input from a user, and a plurality of light emitting diodes (LEDs) 120 for feedback to the user. The control circuit 114 determines the appropriate dimming level of the ELV lamp 104A from the input from the buttons 118.
A zero-cross circuit 122 provides a control signal to the control circuit 114 that identifies the zero-crossings of the AC supply voltage. A zero-crossing is defined as the time at which the AC supply voltage equals zero at the beginning of each half-cycle. The zero-cross circuit 122 receives the AC supply voltage through diode D1 in the positive half-cycle and through diode D2 in the negative half-cycle. The control circuit 114 determines when to turn off the FETs each half-cycle by timing from each zero-crossing of the AC supply voltage.
In order to provide a DC voltage (VCC) to power the microprocessor of the control circuit 114 and the other low-voltage circuitry, the dimmer 100 includes a power supply 124. The power supply 124 is only able to charge when the FETs 110, 112 are both turned off (non-conducting) and there is a voltage potential across the dimmer. Since there are only two connections on a two-wire dimmer, the power supply must draw a leakage current through the connected ELV lighting load 104. For example, during the positive half-cycle, current flows from the AC supply 102 through diode D1 to the power supply 124 and then, via circuit common, out through the body diode of the second FET 112 and through the load 104 back to the AC supply. The power supply 124 may be implemented as a “cat-ear” power supply, which only draws current near the zero-crossings of the AC waveform, or as a standard switch-mode power supply.
In a typical two-wire dimmer, the power supply 124 is implemented as a “cat-ear” power supply, which only draws current near the zero-crossings of the AC waveforms. The power supply 124 has an input capacitor C1 and an output capacitor C2. The output capacitor C2 holds the output of the power supply Vcc at a constant DC voltage to provide power for the control circuit 114. The input of the power supply 124 is coupled to the Hot and Dimmed Hot terminals through the two diodes D1, D2, such that the input capacitor C1 charges during both the positive and negative half-cycles.
The dimmer 100 also includes a voltage divider that comprises two resistors R1, R2 and is coupled between the input of the power supply 124 and circuit common. The voltage divider produces a sense voltage VS at the junction of the two resistors. The sense voltage VS is provided to the control circuit 114 such that the control circuit is able to monitor the voltage level at the input of the power supply 124. The microprocessor in the control circuit 114 preferably includes an analog-to-digital converter (ADC) for sampling the value of the sense voltage VS. The resistors R1, R2 are preferably sized to ensure that the maximum voltage at the pin of the microprocessor of the control circuit 114 does not exceed the power supply output VCC. For example, if the input voltage to the waveform is 240 VRMS and the power supply output VCC is 3.3 VDC, then the values of R1 and R2 can be sized to 450 kΩ and 3 kΩ, respectively, in order to ensure that the magnitude of the sense voltage is less than 3.3 VDC. Alternatively, the voltage divider could be coupled between the output voltage (or another operating voltage) of the power supply 124 and circuit common to provide a signal to the control circuit 114 that is representative of the present operating conditions of the power supply.
According to the present invention, the control circuit 114 monitors the sense voltage VS and decreases the conduction times of the FETs 110, 112 when the sense voltage VS drops below a first predetermined voltage threshold V1. Further, the control circuit 114 increases the conduction times of the FETs 110, 112 when the sense voltage then rises above a second predetermined voltage threshold V2, greater than the first threshold. In a preferred embodiment of the present invention (when used with an input voltage of 240 VRMS), the first and second voltage thresholds V1 and V2 are set to 0.67 VDC and 0.8 VDC, respectively, which correspond to voltages of 100 VDC and 120 VDC at the input of the power supply 124. Alternatively, if the microprocessor does not include an ADC, the dimmer 100 could include a hardware comparison circuit, including one or more comparator integrated circuits, to compare the sense voltage with the first and second voltage thresholds and then provide a logic signal to the microprocessor.
With prior art ELV dimmers, a maximum off-timetOFF-MAX-WC needed to charge the power supply during worst-case conditions was used to determine the maximum on-time tON-MAX-WC of the dimmer. The worst-case conditions may include a low-line AC input voltage or a high current drawn from the power supply by the microprocessor and other low-voltage components. However, the dimmer is not always operating with the worst-case conditions and it may be possible to increase the on-time above the maximum on-time tON-MAX-WC in order to provide a greater light output of the lighting load 104 at high-end.
The dimmer 100 of the present invention has a maximum on-time limit, tON-MAX-LIMIT that is greater than the worst-case on-time tON-MAX-WC. The maximum on-time limit tON-MAX-LIMIT of the dimmer 100 is determined from the appropriate off-time required to charge the input capacitor C1 of the power supply 124 during normal operating conditions. The dimmer 100 also has a dynamic maximum on-time, tON-MAX, that the control circuit 114 is operable to control from one half-cycle to the next. The dynamic maximum on-time tON-MAX cannot exceed the maximum on-time limit tON-MAX-LIMIT, but can be decreased below the limit in order to increase the off-time of the FETs to allow the input capacitor C1 of the power supply 124 more time to charge. By driving the on-time of the FETs above the worst-case on-time tON-MAX-WC, the dimmer 100 of the present invention is able to achieve a greater light output of the connected lighting load 104 than prior art ELV dimmers. However, when the on-time of the FETs is greater than the worst-case on-time tON-MAX-WC, there is a danger of the input capacitor C1 not having enough time to charge in during the off-time of the half-cycle.
By monitoring the input of the power supply 124, the control circuit 114 of the dimmer 100 of the present invention is able to determine when the input voltage has dropped to a level that is inappropriate for continued charging of the input capacitor C1. For example, if the sense voltage VS falls below a first voltage threshold V1, then the capacitor C1 needs a greater time to properly charge and the on-time is decreased. On the other had, if the sense voltage VS remains above the first voltage threshold V1, the input capacitor C1 is able to properly charge each half-cycle.
The flowchart of
At step 322, a determination is made as to whether the maximum on-time tON-MAX is less than the desired on-time tON-DESIRED. If so, the on-time tON is set to the present value of the maximum on-time tON-MAX at step 324. Since the sense voltage is only sampled after the FETs are turned off (at step 312), the change to the on-time tON at step 320 will affect the on-time of the dimmed hot voltage during the next half-cycle. The process then exits at step 326 for the current half-cycle to begin again at the beginning of the next half-cycle. If the maximum on-time tON-MAX is greater than the desired on-time tON-DESIRED at step 322, then the dimmer has returned to normal operating conditions. The desired on-time tON-DESIRED is used as the on-time at step 328 and the process exits at step 326.
If the sense voltage VS is greater than the first voltage threshold V1 at step 314 and the sense voltage is less than the second voltage threshold V2 at step 330, then the maximum on-time tON-MAX and thus the on-time tON are not changed. If the sense voltage VS is greater than the second voltage threshold V2 at step 330, the process moves to step 332 where a determination is made as to whether the present maximum on-time tON-MAX is less than the maximum on-time limit tON-MAX-LIMIT. If not, the maximum on-time tON-MAX has returned to the limit and the maximum on-time tON-MAX and the on-time tON are not changed. However, if the present maximum on-time tON-MAX is greater than the maximum on-time limit tON-MAX-LIMIT at step 332, then the maximum on-time tON-MAX is increased by a second predetermined time increment t2 for the next half-cycle at step 334. The second predetermined time increment t2 preferably corresponds to 0.5% of the dimming range.
During the fourth half-cycle (d), the sense voltage falls below the first voltage threshold V1. The control circuit 114 decreases the on-time of the dimmed hot voltage during the next half-cycle (e) by the first time increment t1. Thus, the input capacitor C1 has more time to charge during the off-time of the next half-cycle (e).
However, during the half-cycle (e), the sense voltage once again falls below the first voltage threshold V1. So, the control circuit 114 decreases the on-time of the dimmed hot voltage during the next half-cycle (f) by the first time increment t1. The cycle repeats again until the sense voltage does not fall below the first voltage threshold V1 during the half-cycle (g). Now, the on-time of the dimmed hot waveform is held constant through the next half-cycles (h), (i).
During half-cycle (n), the sense voltage remains above the second voltage threshold V2. Therefore, the control circuit 114 increases the maximum on-time of the dimmed hot waveform during the next half-cycle (o) by the second time increment t2. While the sense voltage continues to remain above the second voltage threshold V2, the control circuit 114 continues increasing the maximum on-time each half-cycle by the second time interval t2 until the maximum on-time is equal to the original maximum on-time.
The dimmer 100 of the present invention has been described such that the control circuit 114 is operable to change the maximum on-time tON-MAX from one half-cycle to the next. However, it may be preferable to only change the maximum on-time tON-MAX from one line-cycle to the next. Many dimmers are operable to drive multiple types of lighting loads. Some lighting loads, such as magnetic low-voltage (MLV) lighting loads, are susceptible to asymmetries that produce a DC component in the voltage across the load. For example, the magnetic low-voltage transformers required for MLV lighting may saturate and overheat when the load voltage has a DC component. When the on-time is changed from one half-cycle to the next, the voltage across the lighting load with be asymmetric and a DC component will be present in the voltage. On the other hand, when the on-time is only changed from one line-cycle to the next, the load voltage will remain symmetric and the problem of saturating or overheating the MLV transformer will be avoided.
While the dimmer 100 of the present invention was described primarily in regards to control of ELV loads, the dimmer may be used to control other load types, for example, incandescent or MLV loads.
Although the present invention has been described in relation to particular embodiments thereof, many other variations and modifications and other uses will become apparent to those skilled in the art. It is preferred, therefore, that the present invention be limited not by the specific disclosure herein, but only by the appended claims.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3471771||Feb 2, 1967||Oct 7, 1969||Rca Corp||Self-regulating switching circuit|
|US4242627||Dec 5, 1977||Dec 30, 1980||Edmund Kisiel||Battery charger|
|US4300090||Mar 2, 1979||Nov 10, 1981||Weber Harold J||Direct current power supply|
|US4321523||Oct 5, 1978||Mar 23, 1982||The Gates Rubber Company||Battery charger and power supply circuitry|
|US4328528||Dec 8, 1980||May 4, 1982||Honeywell Inc.||Two-wire condition control circuit means|
|US4389608||Sep 30, 1981||Jun 21, 1983||Dahl Ernest A||Transformerless battery controlled battery charger|
|US4504778||Jul 15, 1982||Mar 12, 1985||Electronic Systems International, Inc.||Self-powered, self-regulated, electronic ac control system|
|US4641233||May 3, 1985||Feb 3, 1987||Eaton Corporation||AC to DC converter with voltage regulation|
|US4878010||Dec 10, 1987||Oct 31, 1989||Weber Harold J||Electric a.c power switch controller and d.c. power supply method and apparatus|
|US4893063||Oct 6, 1987||Jan 9, 1990||Joseph Pernyeszi||Apparatus for improving the efficiency of a lighting element|
|US5030890||Apr 28, 1989||Jul 9, 1991||Johnson Samuel A||Two terminal incandescent lamp controller|
|US5081411||Dec 20, 1990||Jan 14, 1992||Honeywell Inc.||AC/DC two-wire control techniques|
|US5214369||Dec 30, 1991||May 25, 1993||The Charles Machine Works, Inc.||Universal battery charger|
|US5604387||May 11, 1994||Feb 18, 1997||Fisher & Paykel Limited||Power supply derived from motor winding|
|US5631542||Jun 7, 1995||May 20, 1997||Robert Bosch Gmbh||Method for controlling the strength of a charging current|
|US5652504||Mar 31, 1994||Jul 29, 1997||Lti International, Inc.||Energy saving power control system|
|US5838555||Sep 24, 1997||Nov 17, 1998||Legrand||Two-wire power supply electronic switch|
|US5903139||Jan 27, 1997||May 11, 1999||Honeywell Inc.||Power stealing solid state switch for supplying operating power to an electronic control device|
|US6057674||Jul 25, 1997||May 2, 2000||Ultrawatt Integrated Systems, Inc.||Energy saving power control system|
|US6061259||Aug 30, 1999||May 9, 2000||Demichele; Glenn||Protected transformerless AC to DC power converter|
|US6111368 *||Sep 26, 1997||Aug 29, 2000||Lutron Electronics Co., Inc.||System for preventing oscillations in a fluorescent lamp ballast|
|US6169391||Jul 12, 1999||Jan 2, 2001||Supertex, Inc.||Device for converting high voltage alternating current to low voltage direct current|
|US6205041||Jul 28, 1999||Mar 20, 2001||Carrier Corporation||Power supply for electronic thermostat|
|US6347028||Jun 21, 1999||Feb 12, 2002||Lutron Electronics Co., Inc.||Load control system having an overload protection circuit|
|US6566768||Dec 14, 2000||May 20, 2003||Venstar Inc.||Two line switch and power sharing for programmable means|
|US6657418||Nov 13, 2001||Dec 2, 2003||Honeywell International Inc.||Parasitic power supply system for supplying operating power to a control device|
|US6674248 *||Dec 5, 2001||Jan 6, 2004||Lutron Electronics Co., Inc.||Electronic ballast|
|US6727665 *||May 30, 2002||Apr 27, 2004||Star Bright Technology Limited||Dimmer for energy saving lamp|
|US7005762||Apr 8, 2003||Feb 28, 2006||Lutron Electronics Co., Inc.||Electronic control systems and methods|
|US7193404 *||Nov 24, 2004||Mar 20, 2007||Lutron Electronics Co., Ltd.||Load control circuit and method for achieving reduced acoustic noise|
|US7573436 *||Oct 18, 2007||Aug 11, 2009||Lutron Electronics Co., Inc.||Compact radio frequency transmitting and receiving antenna and control device employing same|
|USRE35220||Jul 8, 1993||Apr 30, 1996||Beacon Light Products, Inc.||Two terminal controller|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US8644041 *||Jan 14, 2010||Feb 4, 2014||Nxp B.V.||PFC with high efficiency at low load|
|US9093894||Dec 17, 2012||Jul 28, 2015||Greenmark Technology Inc.||Multiple-level power control system|
|US9166395||Jan 10, 2013||Oct 20, 2015||Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation||Dimmer control with soft start over-current protection|
|US20110267856 *||Jan 14, 2010||Nov 3, 2011||Nxp B.V.||Pfc with high efficiency at low load|
|U.S. Classification||315/225, 315/360, 315/287, 315/308|
|Cooperative Classification||H05B39/048, Y02B20/148|