Publication number | USRE42716 E1 |
Publication type | Grant |
Application number | US 11/081,075 |
Publication date | Sep 20, 2011 |
Filing date | Mar 16, 2005 |
Priority date | Nov 3, 1998 |
Fee status | Paid |
Also published as | US6535643, USRE39541, USRE42677 |
Publication number | 081075, 11081075, US RE42716 E1, US RE42716E1, US-E1-RE42716, USRE42716 E1, USRE42716E1 |
Inventors | Min-Cheol Hong |
Original Assignee | Lg Electronics, Inc. |
Export Citation | BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan |
Patent Citations (25), Non-Patent Citations (5), Referenced by (1), Classifications (31), Legal Events (1) | |
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet | |
Notice: More than one reissue application has been filed for the reissue of U.S. Pat. No. 6,535,642. The reissue applications are application Ser. Nos. 11/081,073; 11/081,075 (the subject application); and 11/338,905.
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to an image processing technique, and in particular to a method for recovering a compressed video signal and an apparatus therefor.
2. Description of the Prior Art
The image compression technique of MPEG, MPEG2, H261, H263, etc. is implemented by a Hybrid MC DCT (Motion Compensation Discrete Cosine Transform) technique. This hybrid MC DCT is classified into an encoding process and decoding processes. In the encoding process, the original image is divided into a plurality of blocks for compressing the information of a spacious region, and a two-dimensional DCT is performed with respect to each block, and a redundancy is decreased in the image or between the images using a correlation on a time axis between the images for decreasing the information of the time region. In addition, in the decoding process, the reverse sequence of the decoding process is performed. In order to implement the MCDCT technique, an encoder and decoder are required.
While the video signal is being coded, the information may be lost during the quantizing process. Therefore, the video signals reconstructed by the decoder may cause blocking artifacts and ring effects. The block artifacts occur when quantizing a low frequency DCT coefficient, and the ring effects occur due to the information loss of the original video in the quantizing process for a high frequency DCT coefficient.
Namely, in the case of the coding technique using a DCT in a system which is capable of coding a still picture or a motion picture, the entire image is divided into a plurality of small images (for example, 8×8 blocks), and then a transforming operation is performed with respect to the divided blocks, and the original image is processed based on a DCT, and an important information of the original image based on a result of the conversion is included in the low frequency component. As the component becomes high frequency, the important information is decreased. The low frequency component includes an information related to the neighboring block. The DCT transform is performed without considering a correlation between the blocks. Namely, the low frequency components are quantized by the blocks, so that a continuity between the neighboring blocks is lost. This phenomenon is called as the referred to as blocking artifacts.
In addition, when quantizing the coefficients obtained when performing from the DCT operation, as the interval of the quantizing operation is increased, the components to be coded is decreased. Therefore, the number of bits which will be processed is decreased, so that a distortion occurs in the reconstructed original image. This phenomenon is called as the referred to as ring effects. The ring effects, which occur when increasing the intervals of the quantizing operations, are increased at a contour line of an object among in the images.
As a technique for removing the above-described block artifacts and ring effects, a low pass filter technique and a regularization recovering technique are generally used.
The low pass filter sets a filter tap or a filter coefficient based on or by selecting (filter mask) a plurality of pixels near a certain pixel and obtaining an average of the pixels. The recovered images are over smoothed in accordance with the kinds of images, and a compression ratio.
In the regularization recovering method, the block artifacts are adaptively processed in accordance with the statistical characteristic of the images. Namely, a non-uniform information is all computed at all direction boundary areas and in the interior of the block. However, since the computed values have a matrix form, it is impossible to implement a real time computation due to a the large amount of computation. In addition, with an exception except for the amount of non-uniformity, since an average is comprehensively adapted based on a result of the computation of the non-uniform information, in the block having a large amount of non-uniformity, the degree of the non-uniformity is decreased. On the contrary, the degree of the non-uniformity may be increased. Therefore, it is hard to say whether it is well adaptive adapted well to the system.
The above-described two techniques have advantages and disadvantages in view of a complexity and performance increase of the system. Namely, the low pass filter technique has requires less computation amount compared to the regularization recovering technique and has, but has a small capacity for adaptively processing the images, so that the information is lost at an edge portion. The regularization recovering method has an excellent performance and, but requires a large amount of computation when computing regularization parameters.
Accordingly, in the present invention, it is possible to removing a block artifact and ring effect which occur in a decoded video signal.
In addition, it is possible to define a cost function having a directional feature by the unit of pixels during a decoding operation and obtain a regularization parameter based on the cost function.
To achieve the above objects, there is provided a method for recovering a compressed motion picture according to an embodiment of the invention, comprising the steps of defining a cost function having a smoothing degree of an image and a reliability with respect to an original image in consideration of the directional characteristics of the pixels which will be recovered and a plurality of pixels near the recovering pixels, obtaining a regularization parameter variable having a weight value of a reliability with respect to an original image based on the cost function, and approximating the regularization parameter variable using the compressed pixel and obtaining a recovering pixel.
These and other objects of the present application will become more readily apparent from the detailed description given hereinafter. However, it should be understood that the detailed description and specific examples, while indicating preferred embodiments of the invention, are given by way of illustration only, since various changes and modifications within the spirit and scope of the invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from this detailed description.
The present invention relates to filtering an image. In one embodiment, a pixel of an image is filtered using a filtering methodology that adjusts a degree of filtering based on a difference value. Here, the difference value may be based on the pixel being filtered and a neighboring pixel. For example, the neighboring pixel may be a pixel adjacent to the pixel being filtered.
In one embodiment, the method includes determining the difference value. For example, the difference between the pixel being filtered and a neighboring pixel may be determined as the difference value.
In another embodiment, the pixel is filtered based on a quantization parameter used in processing a portion of an image including the pixel. For example, the portion of an image including the pixel may be a macroblock.
In yet another embodiment, the filtering methodology includes determining at least one boundary value based on a quantization parameter of a portion of the image including the pixel. Again, as an example, the portion of the image including the pixel may be a macroblock.
The present invention will become more fully understood from the detailed description given hereinbelow and the accompanying drawings which are given by way of illustration only, and thus as not limitative of the present invention and wherein:
A first embodiment of the present invention will be explained with reference to the accompanying drawings.
In the first embodiment of the present invention, a cost function having a directional feature by the unit of pixels is defined, and a regularization parameter is obtained based on the cost function. A recoverable pixel is obtained using a value which is actually adapted to the regularization parameter and is processed based on a DCT and a projection. Then a resultant data is processed based on a reverse DCT for thereby recovering an image similar to the original image. The above-described operation will be explained in detail.
When the original image f is compressed and transmitted, the image g which is reconstructed by the decoder 201 may be expressed as follows.
g=f+n (1)
where, g, f, and n have a size of MM×1 rearranged in a scanning sequence, and n represents a quantizing difference.
In order to process the original image f by the unit of pixels, the original pixels f(i,j) having a certain position information(i,j) is adapted. The recovered pixel g(i,j) may be expressed using the original pixel(i,j) and a quantizing difference n(i,j) with respect to the original pixel(i,j).
g(i,j)=f(i,j)+n(i,j) (2)
As seen Equation 2, a smoothing which represents a non-uniformity degree with respect to the original pixel f(i,j) and the neighboring pixels of the original pixel f(i,j) and a cost function including includes a reliability with respect to the original pixel f(i,j) and the compressed pixel g(i,j).
First, in order to consider the directional features of four pixels f(i,j+1), f(i+1,j), f(i,j−1), and f(i−1,j) with respect to the original pixel f(i,j), the cost functions of M_{HL}(f(i,j)), M_{HR}(f(i,j)), M_{VT}(f(i,j)), M_{VD}(f(i,j)), M_{T}(f(i,j)) are defined with respect to the neighboring pixels. In order to set a time based region relationship of the original pixel f(i,j), the cost function M_{T}(f(i,j)) is defined. Next, the cost functions of M_{HL}(f(i,j)), M_{HR}(f(i,j)), M_{VT}(f(i,j)), M_{VD}(f(i,j)), M_{T}(f(i,j)) with respect to the neighboring pixels and the cost function M_{T}(f(i,j)) of the time region are summed, so that it is possible to obtain the cost function M(f(i,j)) with respect to the original pixel f(i,j) may be obtained based on as shown in Equation (3).
M(f(i,j))=M_{HL}(f(i,j))+M_{HR}(f(i,j))+M_{VT}(f(i,j))+M_{VD}(f(i,j))+M_{T}(f(i,j)) (3)
where M_{HL}represents a cost function having a relationship between the pixel f(i,j) and the left side neighboring pixel f(i,j−1), M_{HR}(f(i,j)) represents a cost function having a relationship between the pixel f(i,j) and the right side neighboring pixel f(i,j+1), M_{VT}(f(i,j)) represents a cost function having a relationship between the pixel f(i,j) and the upper side neighboring pixel f(i−1,j), M_{VD}(f(i,j)) represents a cost function having a relationship between the pixel f(i,j) and the lower side neighboring pixel f(i+1,j), and M_{T}(f(i,j)) represents a cost function having a relationship of the time region.
The cost function having a smoothing degree and reliability may be expressed as the following equation 4.
M_{HL}(f(i,j))=[f(i,j)−f(i,j−1)]^{2}+α_{HL}[g(i,j)−f(i,j)]^{2 }
M_{HR}(f(i,j))=[f(i,j)−f(i,j+1)]^{2}+α_{HR}[g(i,j)−f(i,j)]^{2 }
M_{VT}(f(i,j))=[f(i,j)−f(i−1,j)]^{2}+α_{VT}[g(i,j)−f(i,j)]^{2 }
M_{VD}(f(i,j))=[f(i,j)−f(i+1,j)]^{2}+α_{VD}[g(i,j)−f(i,j)]^{2 }
MT(f(i,j))=[f(i,j)−f_{MC}(i,j)]^{2}+α_{T}[g(i,j)−f(i,j)]^{2 } (4)
As seen in Equation 4, the first term of the right side of each cost function represents a smoothing degree with respect to the original pixel and the neighboring pixel, and the second term of the right side represents a reliability with respect to the original pixel and the recovered pixel.
The first term of the right side of the cost function M_{HL}(f(i,j)) represents a square value of the difference between the original pixel f(i,j) and the left side neighboring pixel f(i,j−1) and represents a uniformity degree, namely, a smoothed degree of the original pixel f(i,j) and the left side neighboring pixel f(i,j−1) based on the error component between the original pixel f(i,j) and the left side neighboring pixel f(i,j−1). In addition, the second term of the right side of the cost function M_{HL}(f(i,j)) represents a square value of the difference between the original pixel f(i,j) and the compressed pixel g(i,j) and represents a value for comparing whether a certain difference exists between the compressed pixel g(i,j) and the original pixel f(i,j) based on a difference component between the original pixel f(i,j) and the compressed pixel g(i,j) and represents a reliability of the original pixel f(i,j) and the compressed pixel g(i,j).
In addition, the first term of the right side of M_{HR}(f(i,j)) represents a smoothing degree of the original pixel f(i,j) and the right side neighboring pixel f(i,j+1), and the second term of the right side represents a reliability of the original pixel f(i,j) and the compressed pixel g(i,j). The first term of the right side of the cost function M_{VT}(f(i,j)) represents a smoothing degree of the original pixel f(i,j) and the upper side neighboring pixel f(i−1,j), and the second term of the right side represents a reliability of the original pixel, and the compressed pixel g(i,j). The first term of the right side of the cost function M_{VT}(f(i,j)) represents a smoothing degree of the original pixel f(i,j) and the lower side neighboring pixel f(i+1,j), and the second term of the right side represents a reliability of the original pixel f(i,j) and the compressed pixel g(i,j). M_{T}(f(i,j)) represents a cost function for setting a relationship of the time region.
The values of α_{HL}, α_{HR}, α_{VT}, α_{VD }α_{T }of the second term of the right side represents a regularization parameter and a ratio of a smoothing degree and reliability. These values represent a difference component. In addition, these values represent a weight value with respect to the reliability. As these values are increased, the reliability is enhanced. Since the smoothing degree and the reliability are opposite to each other, the ratio of the smoothing degree and reliability is determined when the regularization parameter is determined. Each regularization parameter may be expressed as the following Equation 5.
In the above Equation 5, the denominators of the above-equations represents a difference between the original pixel and the compressed pixel, and the numerator represents a difference between the original pixel and the neighboring pixel.
Computation of Recovering Pixels Based on Cost Function
It is needed to obtain the recovering pixels which is the original pixels. However, the cost function includes a square with respect to the original pixel. Therefore, the cost function is partially differentiated with respect to the original pixel, so that it is possible to obtain the original pixels based on the differentiated values. The cost function M(f(i,j)) may be differentiated based on Equation 3.
Each term of the right side of the cost function with respect to the neighboring pixels is as follows.
The values of Equation 7 are substituted for Equation 6, and the pixels which will be finally recovered are in the following Equation 8.
The pixels expressed by Equation 8 are the pixels included in the inter macro block. However, the pixels of the macro block coded into the intra macro type based on Equation 6 is
because there is not a motion information on tile time axis. Therefore, the pixels included in the intra macro block may be expressed in the following Equation 9.
Therefore, the pixels included in the inter macro block are obtained based on a filter strength of Equation 8, and the pixels included in the intra macro block are obtained based on a filter strength of Equation 9. Whether the pixels of the macro block are coded in the intra macro type or in the inter macro type are determined by the intra inter information (p=mtype).
As seen in Equations 8 and 9, the recovering pixels include a regularization parameter α, and each regularization parameter variable is approximated as follows.
Approximation of Regularization Parameter Variable
As seen in Equation 5, each regularization parameter variable includes an original pixel, a neighboring pixel, and a recovering pixel (compressed pixel). In addition, since the original pixel f(i,j) and four neighboring pixels f(i,j−1), f(i,j+1), f(i−1,j), f(i+1,j) are the original pixels, these values do not exist in the decoder. Therefore, the pixels f(i,j), f(i,j−1), f(i,j+1), f(i−1,j), f(i+1,j) may not be used for an actual computation. Therefore, in order to actually use the pixels f(i,j), f(i,j−1), f(i,j+1), f(i−1,j), f(i+1,j), the compressed pixels g(i,j), g(i,j−1), g(i,j+1), g(i−1,j), g(i+1,j) must be approximated. To implement the above-described approximation, the following three cases are assumed.
First, the quantizing maximum difference of the macro block unit is a quantizing variable (Qp).
Second, a quantizing difference of each DCT coefficient is uniformly allocated to each pixel of a corresponding macro block,
Third, the non-uniform values between two pixels of the original image are statistically similar to the non-uniform values between two pixels of the compressed image.
As seen in the following Equation 10, each regularization variable is approximated based on the above-described three cases.
The thusly approximated regularization parameter variable is substituted for Equation 8 or 9 for thereby obtaining a result value f(i,j).
As shown therein, in Step ST1, whether the processing pixels are referred to the pixels of the intra macro block or the pixels of the inter macro block is judged. As a result of the judgement, in Steps ST2 and ST3, the regularization parameter variable is obtained. Namely, if the processing pixels are referred to the pixels of the intra macro block, in Step ST2, the regularization parameter variables α_{HL}, α_{HR}, α_{VT}, α_{VDar }are obtained based on Equation 9. In addition, if the processing pixels are referred to the pixels of the inter macro block, the regularization parameter variables α_{HL}, α_{HR}, α_{VT}, α_{VD}, α_{T }are obtained in Step ST3. In addition, the pixel f(i,j) is obtained in Step ST4 based on the obtained regularization parameter variable. At this time, if the processing pixels are referred to the pixels of the inter macro block, and the pixels are obtained based on Equation 8, and if the processing pixels are referred to the pixels of the inter macro block, the pixels are obtained based on Equation 9.
Recovering the Images Using a Projection Technique
In Step ST5, a DCT is performed with respect to the pixel f(ij) f(i,j), and then a quantizing process is performed therefor. Here, the DCT coefficient of the pixel f(i,j) may be expressed as F(u,v).
The value G(u,v) which is DCT-processed with respect to the compressed image g(i,j) may be expressed in the DCT region based on the following Equation 11.
G=QBf (11)
The DCT coefficient of the original image and the DCT coefficient of the compressed image have the following interrelationship as seen in Equation 12.
G(u,v)−Qpl≦F(u,v)≦G(u,v)+Qpl (12)
The Equation 13 will be explained in detail.
If F(u,v) is smaller than G(u,v)−Qpl, the projected recovering image P(F(u,v) is mapped based on G(u,v)−Qpl, and if F(u,v) is larger than G(u,v)−Qpl, the projected recovering image P(F(u,v)) is mapped based on G(u,v)+Qpl, otherwise P(F(u,v)) is directly mapped based on the projected recovering image F(u,v).
The mapped image P(F(u,v)) is reversely DCT-processed in the spacious region in Step ST7, and the finally recovered image may be expressed by the following Equation 14.
f′=B^{T}PBf=B^{T}PBK(g) (14)
In the present invention, it is possible to eliminate a block artifact and ring effect based on an non-uniform degree and reliability of the recovered image using a plurality of information from the decoder.
Repetition Technique
If the block artifact and ring effect are not fully eliminated from the recovered pixels, he the above-described processes may be repeatedly performed. As the process for eliminating the block artifact and ring effect is repeatedly performed, the block artifact and ring effect of the recovering image is more further eliminated. In this case, a blurring phenomenon occurs in the edge region of the image. Therefore, the number of repetition must be determined based on the block artifact and ring effect and the blurring phenomenon which is opposite thereto.
The recovering image f_{k+1}(i,j) is as follows based on Equations 15 and 16 by repeating the above-described process by k-times.
The image expressed based on Equation 15 is related to the pixels included in the inter macro block, and the image expressed based on Equation 16 is related to the pixels included in the intra macro block.
The regularization parameter variables are obtained based on Equations (15) 15 and 16, and the DCT is performed with respect thereto, and the projection technique is adapted. Then, and then the reverse DCT is performed therefor, so that the final recovering image is obtained based on Equation 17.
f_{k+1}′=B^{T}PB{circumflex over (f)}=B^{T}PBK(g_{k+1}) (17)
Namely, the block artifacts and ring effects are eliminated from the recovered images by an adaptive decoding operation, so that a real time process is implemented in the digital video apparatus. In particular, it is possible to enhance the resolution in the compression images which require a low bit ration ratio or high speed process.
Next, another embodiment of the present invention will be explained. This embodiment of the present invention is basically directed to decreasing the computation amount and time compared to the earlier embodiment of the present invention. The operation thereof is performed by the recovering apparatus, as shown in
M(f(i,j)=M_{L}(f(i,j))+M_{R}(f(i,j))+M_{U}(f(i,j))+M_{D}(f(i,j)) (18)
Next, the cost functions including a smoothing degree and reliability are defined. The regularization parameter variable is included in only the portion (the second term of the right side in Equation 4) of the reliability with respect to the original pixel and recovered pixel. Differently from this construction, in another embodiment of the present invention, the regularization parameter variable is included in the portion which represents a reliability of the original pixel and recovered pixel as well as is included in the portion which represents the smoothing degree with respect to the original pixel and the neighboring pixel. In addition, the smoothing degree and the reliability of the pixel are opposite each other inn in their meaning. Each cost function may be expressed based on Equation 19 as follows:. Equation 19.
M_{L}(f(i,j))=α_{L}(f(i,j))[f(i,j)−f(i,j−1)]^{2}+(1−α_{L}(f(i,j)))[g(i,j)−f(i,j)]^{2 }
M_{R}(f(i,j))=α_{R}(f(i,j))[f(i,j)−f(i,j+1)]^{2}+(1−α_{R}(f(i,j)))[g(i,j)−f(i,j)]^{2 }
M_{U}(f(i,j))=α_{U}(f(i,j))[i f(i,j)−f(i−1i,j)]^{2}+(1−α_{U}(f(i,j)))[g(i,j)−f(i,j)]^{2} M_{U}(f(i,j))=α_{U}(f(i,j))[f(i,j)−f(i−1,j)]^{2}+(1−α_{U}(f(i,j)))[g(i,j)−f(i,j)]^{2 }
M_{D}(f(i,j))=α_{D}(f(i,j))[f(i,j)−f(i+1,j)]^{2}+(1−α_{D}(f(i,j)))[g(i,j)−f(i,j)]^{2} (19)
As seen in Equation 19, the first term of the right side represents a smoothing degree with respect to the original pixel and the neighboring pixel, and the second term of the right side represents a reliability with respect to the original pixel and the recovered pixel. Here, α_{L}, α_{R}, α_{U}, α_{D }represent a regularization parameter variable with respect to each cost function and represent a ratio of a smoothing degree and reliability as a difference component. For example, α_{L }represents a weight value with respect to the smoothing degree, and 1−α_{L }represents a weight value with respect to the reliability. Therefore, as the regularization parameter variable is increased, the smoothing degree is increased, and the reliability is decreased. Since the regularization includes the right side first term and the left side term of the cost function, it is possible to implement more stable smoothing degree and reliability compared to the earlier embodiment of the present invention.
Next, in order to obtain the recovering pixel, the cost function is partially differentiated with respect to the original pixel. The thusly differentiated value is obtained by the following Equation 20.
The terms of the right side of Equation 20 are as follows:
When the values expressed based on Equation 21 are substituted for Equation 20, the finally recovered pixels are obtained based on the following Equation 22.
In addition, in the macro block type (mtype), the bit value which is defined as COD is included. This COD includes an information of the macro block. If COD value is ‘0’, it means the coded macro block, and if COD value is ‘1’, it means the non-coded macro block (not coded). Namely, it is possible to Recognize recognize whether the pixels of the current macro block are the same as the pixels of the previously transmitted macro block. If COD value is ‘0’, it means that the macro block of the previous compressed image is different from the macro block of the current image, and if COD value is ‘1’, it means that the macro block of the previous image is the same as the macro block of the current image. Therefore, if COD value is ‘0’, the value is recovered based on Equation 22, and if COD value is ‘1’, as seen in Equation 23, the recovered pixel value fp(i,j) is substituted for the current pixel value with respect to the macro block of the previous image.
f(i,j)=fp(i,j) (23)
Next, as seen in Equation 22, the recovering pixel includes a regularization parameter variable α, and each regularization parameter variable is obtained as follows.
The regularization parameter variable is obtained based on Equation 19. Namely, since the smoothing degree and reliability are opposite to each other, the regularization parameter variable may be arranged according to Equation 24 as follows based on a ratio of the smoothing degree and the reliability. Equation 24 may be expressed as follows.
In order to obtain the regularization parameter variable expressed as Equation 24, the pixels f(i,j), f(ij−1), f(i,j+1), f(i−1,j), f(i+1,j) must be approximated based on the compressed pixels g(i,j), g(i,j−1), g(i,j+1), g(i−1,j), g(i+1,j) which may be actually used. For implementing the above-described operation, the following three cases are assumed.
First, a quantization difference of each pixel is a function of a quantization variable Qp which is set by the unit of macro blocks.
Second, since the block artifacts generating at a block boundary has a certain non-uniformity degree which is larger than the ring effect occurring in the interior of the block, the difference with respect to the pixels positioned at the block boundary is more largely reflected compared to the pixels positioned in the interior of the block. Namely, a weight value is provided to the difference based on the position of the pixels.
Equation 24 is approximated to Equation 25 based on the above-described two assumptions.
Assuming that one block is formed of 8×8 number of pixels, namely, assuming that I and j of f(i,j) is 8, respectively, the weight values K_{L}, K_{R}, K_{U}, K_{D }may be expressed as follows.
For example, in the Equation related to K_{L}, if the residual is 0 when dividing j by 8, K_{L }is 9, and otherwise, K_{L }is 1.
When the approximated regularization parameter values are substituted for Equation 22, it is possible to obtain a resultant value f(i,j).
In Step ST10, it is judged whether the pixels of the current macro block are the same as the pixels of the previously transmitted macro block based on the COD value. If they are same, in Step ST11, the recovering pixel values are substituted for the pixel values which are previously recovered based on Equation 23. If they are not the same, in Step ST12, the regularization parameter variables α_{L}, α_{R}, α_{U}, α_{D }are obtained based on Equation 26, and the recovering pixel f(i,j) is obtained based on Equation 22 in Step ST13.
As described above, in the present invention, a certain weight is provided to the regularization parameter variable, which will be approximated, based on the position of the pixels in consideration with the reliability and smoothing degree as well as the regularization parameter variables, so that it is possible to obtain a value which is near the actual pixel value. Therefore, in the present invention, it is not needed to perform a projection method and a repetition method. In addition, in the present invention, the computation amount and time are significantly decreased.
The invention being thus described, it will be obvious that the same may be varied in many ways. Such variations are not to be regarded as a departure from the spirit and scope of the invention, and all such modifications as would be obvious to one skilled in the art are intended to be included within the scope of the following claims invention.
Cited Patent | Filing date | Publication date | Applicant | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5283646 | Apr 9, 1992 | Feb 1, 1994 | Picturetel Corporation | Quantizer control method and apparatus |
US5488570 | Jun 29, 1994 | Jan 30, 1996 | Intel Corporation | Encoding and decoding video signals using adaptive filter switching criteria |
US5563813 | Jun 1, 1994 | Oct 8, 1996 | Industrial Technology Research Institute | Area/time-efficient motion estimation micro core |
US5611000 | Jan 16, 1996 | Mar 11, 1997 | Digital Equipment Corporation | Spline-based image registration |
US5748795 * | Feb 5, 1996 | May 5, 1998 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Image decoder using adjustable filtering |
US5790131 | May 15, 1996 | Aug 4, 1998 | Iterated Systems, Inc. | System and method for lossy compression of data with output file size control |
US5878166 | Dec 26, 1995 | Mar 2, 1999 | C-Cube Microsystems | Field frame macroblock encoding decision |
US5940536 | Aug 29, 1996 | Aug 17, 1999 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Ringing detector and filter |
US6041145 | Jul 15, 1998 | Mar 21, 2000 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Device and method for smoothing picture signal, device and method for encoding picture and device and method for decoding picture |
US6058210 | Sep 15, 1997 | May 2, 2000 | Xerox Corporation | Using encoding cost data for segmentation of compressed image sequences |
US6108455 | May 29, 1998 | Aug 22, 2000 | Stmicroelectronics, Inc. | Non-linear image filter for filtering noise |
US6167164 * | Mar 10, 1998 | Dec 26, 2000 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | One-dimensional signal adaptive filter for reducing blocking effect and filtering method |
US6178205 | Dec 12, 1997 | Jan 23, 2001 | Vtel Corporation | Video postfiltering with motion-compensated temporal filtering and/or spatial-adaptive filtering |
US6195632 | Nov 25, 1998 | Feb 27, 2001 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Extracting formant-based source-filter data for coding and synthesis employing cost function and inverse filtering |
US6226050 | Apr 3, 1998 | May 1, 2001 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Signal adaptive filtering method for reducing ringing noise and signal adaptive filter |
US6259823 | Oct 22, 1997 | Jul 10, 2001 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Signal adaptive filtering method and signal adaptive filter for reducing blocking effect and ringing noise |
US6385245 | Sep 18, 1998 | May 7, 2002 | Us Philips Corporation | Motion estimation and motion-compensated interpolition |
US6529638 | Feb 1, 1999 | Mar 4, 2003 | Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. | Block boundary artifact reduction for block-based image compression |
US6594400 | Aug 24, 1999 | Jul 15, 2003 | Lg Electronics Inc. | Method of removing block phenomenon and ring phenomenon in compression coded image |
US6631162 | Jun 18, 1998 | Oct 7, 2003 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Signal adaptive filtering method, signal adaptive filter and computer readable medium for storing program therefor |
US6665346 * | Apr 30, 1999 | Dec 16, 2003 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Loop-filtering method for image data and apparatus therefor |
US7272186 | Jun 14, 2002 | Sep 18, 2007 | Lg Electronics, Inc. | Loop filtering method in video coder |
US20050147319 | Jun 7, 2004 | Jul 7, 2005 | Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. | System and method for removing ringing artifacts |
US20050201633 | Mar 11, 2005 | Sep 15, 2005 | Daeyang Foundation | Method, medium, and filter removing a blocking effect |
WO1999004497A2 | Jun 18, 1998 | Jan 28, 1999 | Samsung Electronics Co Ltd | Signal adaptive filtering method, signal adaptive filter and computer readable medium for storing program therefor |
Reference | ||
---|---|---|
1 | Korean Office Action dated Jul. 18, 2005, with English Translation. | |
2 | Office Action dated Feb. 3, 2009 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 11/338,905. | |
3 | Pang, Khee K. et al. "Optimum Loop Filter in Hybrid Coolers." IEEE Circuit and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 4, No. 2, Apr. 1994, pp. 158-167. | |
4 | Yang et al. "Iterative Projection Algorithms for Removing the Blocking Artifacts of Bock-DCT Compressed Images." IEEE 1993, pp. V405-V408. | |
5 | Zakhor. "Iterative Procedures for Reduction of Blocking Effects in Transform Image Coding." IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 2, No. 1, IEEE Mar. 1993, pp. 91-95. |
Citing Patent | Filing date | Publication date | Applicant | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20100272191 * | Jan 12, 2009 | Oct 28, 2010 | Camilo Chang Dorea | Methods and apparatus for de-artifact filtering using multi-lattice sparsity-based filtering |
U.S. Classification | 382/232, 375/240.29, 382/266, 382/254, 382/233 |
International Classification | H04N19/196, H04N19/86, H04N19/423, H04N19/60, H04N19/176, H04N19/513, H04N19/124, H04N19/51, H04N19/625, H04N19/134, H04N19/44, G06K9/36, G06K9/40, H04N5/92, G06T9/00, H04N1/41 |
Cooperative Classification | H04N19/192, H04N19/139, H04N19/159, H04N19/86, H04N19/117 |
European Classification | H04N7/26P4, H04N7/26A6S2, H04N7/26A10T, H04N7/26A4F, H04N7/26A6C4C |