|Publication number||USRE43207 E1|
|Application number||US 12/239,620|
|Publication date||Feb 21, 2012|
|Filing date||Sep 26, 2008|
|Priority date||Dec 15, 2000|
|Also published as||EP1217565A2, EP1217565A3, US7113738, US20020111134|
|Publication number||12239620, 239620, US RE43207 E1, US RE43207E1, US-E1-RE43207, USRE43207 E1, USRE43207E1|
|Inventors||Marianna Salurso, Silvia Conti, Enrico Gulfi|
|Original Assignee||Darby & Mohaine, L.L.C.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (17), Non-Patent Citations (5), Classifications (11), Legal Events (5)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This patent application is a reissue application for commonly assigned U.S. Pat. No. 7,113,738, issued from U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/738,390, filed on Dec. 15, 2000.
This invention relates to a scheduling and booking method and system to assist broadcast service providers in defining broadcast schedules of programs of different types from a number of program content providers.
In present day communications, broadcast service providers are a group of businesses that broadcast programs, such as sports, cartoons, news, documentaries, etc., to public subscribers via media such as a cable system or a satellite network. The broadcast service providers own and operate the facilities from which the broadcasts originate. Construction and operation of these facilities usually involve substantial capital investment. To recoup the investment and make a profit, the broadcast service providers charge fees for the use of their facilities.
Traditionally, broadcast service providers operate their businesses by renting-broadcast network capacity to content providers, i.e., organizations that create or aggregate content for the business-to-business or consumer market. Content providers can be produCers of virtually any type of program content, such as sports events, drama and comedy shows, business training material, education courses, infomercial, data, etc. Network capacity is basically defined as the amount of capacity (bandwidth) that the operator controls for a facility, this usually being measured in Kbit/sec. The bandwidth typically is a fixed quantity which is a function of the broadcast medium, such as wire or fiber optic cable and satellite. Also, the broadcast service provider often can only operate over a given bandwidth as assigned by a Governmental agency, such as the Federal Communications Commission in the United States. The bandwidth is usually available to the broadcast service provider to rent on a 24 hour per day basis, but this also may be subject to Government regulations and contractual provisions.
Thanks to the availability of network management technology, broadcast service providers have been able to subdivide network capacity and rent single portions (called “transponder space”) to content providers to broadcast their material, usually for the ultimate purpose of producing revenue for the content provider. The transponder space rented can be a certain amount or all of the bandwidth available to the broadcast service provider for a certain period of time. For example, a broadcast server provider may have available a 1 megabit/sec capacity and the content provider needs only 200 Kbit/sec to broadcast his content for a one hour time period. Thus, the broadcast server provider has 800 Kbit/sec space to rent to one or more other content providers for the same time period.
Typically, a content provider has had to sign a rental contract commitment (booking) for a considerable amount of network capacity over a long period of time (for example, several hundred hours of 100 Kbit/sec capacity to be used over a six month period). This often required a substantial up front monetary investment by the content provider. The practice of requiring a substantial up front payment and broadcast time commitment was based on the need of the broadcast service providers to secure the business of content providers by contractually binding their customers.
The evolution of content authoring and content management technologies, such as being able to produce content by computer and with a reduced number of people, has created a number of small and medium-size content provider organizations that produce and need to distribute the content that they produce. Such providers would like to benefit from the advantages offered by broadband broadcast networks in distributing the content, but cannot afford the investment required to rent a full or a substantial part of the full transponder space of a broadcast service provider. Also, the long term contractual approach makes it difficult, if not impossible, for content providers with limited financial resources to access the broadcast networks needed to distribute their content.
Due to competition and the advances in technology, the prices of selling transponder space are falling, thereby eroding a main revenue stream of the broadcast service providers. Thus, the broadcast service providers are looking for new ways to increase their revenue. The new market of energizing content providers represents an interesting financial opportunity for broadcast service providers. To accommodate this, the broadcast service providers must try to restructure their businesses to rent a maximum amount of their network capacity, such as by being able to sell pieces of available transponder space to numerous content providers.
Accordingly, a need exists to accommodate both the new type of content providers and the broadcast service providers in being able to address this new segment of business in a manner that provides benefits to each. This requires proper scheduling of the to available transponder space and booking of the program requests from the various content providers.
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/046,901 filed Mar. 24, 1998 (PCT WO 99/49663), entitled METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR BROADCAST TRANSMISSION OF MEDIA OBJECTS,” which is assigned to the assignee of the subject application and whose entire disclosure is incorporated herein by reference, discloses a new broadband broadcast platform system that supports advanced network management features. The system and method of that application, hereafter called CECTM, assembles content from a number of different content providers, for example, news and infomercials, as well as all other types of content, and provides for distribution of the content at different times of broadcast depending upon the needs of the content provider in the distribution of a particular program. That is, the programs have different durations, require different network capacity and are scheduled for broadcast at different times.
For example, a content provider may want to rent only the network capacity (transponder space) required for one single content transmission, e.g., 128 Kbit/sec, during 50 seconds on a given date. Such a request does not require the need of a long-term rental contract. Through the CECTM a content provider can directly define a broadcast plan by specifying transmission specific parameters such as program desired, start and stop time, required bandwidth and transmission priority. Transmission priority is usually assigned by negotiation between the broadcast service provider and content providers, depending on factors such as price charged for the transponder space at a desired program broadcast time. For example, a content provider pays a low price when he agrees to have his program broadcast at any free time of the network capacity. Such a program would have a low transmission priority as compared to a program guaranteed to be broadcast at a specific time for which the content provider pays a higher rate. Also, priority can be assigned by time of broadcast since the number of potential subscribers available to view a program depends on this, e.g., evening prime time hours as compared to early morning hours.
By using features of the CECTM management system, the broadcast service provider can define new business models based on parameters such as volume of transmitted content, transmission time, content type and number of subscribers. These parameters can be combined to define the cost of broadcast services offered to content providers. For example, the broadcast service provider can decide to charge content providers based on the volume of content transmitted, regardless of transmission time. Alternatively, a higher charge could be applied if the content is transmitted during prime time hours, i.e., a time during which traffic tends to be more intense.
The present invention relates to a scheduling and booking system and method to be used interactively between content providers who wish to rent transponder space and a broadcast service provider who operates a facility having a defined channel capacity over which programs are to be broadcast. In accordance with the invention, the broadcast service provider operates a computer system that maintains a schedule of programs that are booked for transmission. The schedule includes the program parameters of duration and bandwidth required for transmission, as well as the date and time of transmission.
A content provider who wishes to rent transponder space to broadcast a program submits a request to the broadcast service provider, which request includes at least the program duration and required bandwidth. The request also can include additional parameters, such as a specific time of day for the broadcast and broadcast date.
The system checks the request against the programs already booked for broadcast and advises if the request can be satisfied or rejects the request because of an existing booking. The check made is to determine if the bandwidth is available, this being the difference between the maximum channel capacity and the bandwidth of already booked programs, is sufficient to accommodate the bandwidth needed for the requested program. It is possible that the broadcast channel capacity can accommodate transmission of two (or more) programs at the same time so long as the maximum channel capacity is not exceeded.
If the request also designates specific time and date parameters for the program broadcast, the check can be made specific to such designated times and dates. If a request is accepted, meaning that it can be satisfied, a reply confirmation is generated and the program request is booked on the schedule.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, if a request cannot be satisfied, the system generates a list of available alternative times and dates that can satisfy the request. The party making the request can select one or more of the available alternatives and resubmit the request. The process of checking the new request against the program booked is repeated and a reply is given whether the new request has been accepted or rejected. If accepted, a confirmation is given and, if rejected, another list of alternatives is provided.
The invention provides a system and method for maintaining a schedule for a broadcast service provider which is able to book or reject additional program broadcast requests based on the available channel capacity and can accommodate scheduling based on a request of program duration and required bandwidth and time and date of broadcast. The invention can be configured to schedule program transmissions from requests made by a plurality of content providers, to maintain a schedule of programs to be transmitted based on program duration and required transmission bandwidth, to accommodate requests for transmission of other programs within the maximum channel capacity of a broadcast station, and to determine if a request of a program broadcast from a content provider can be satisfied based on the duration and bandwidth of the program as compared to programs already booked by a broadcast service provider.
Other feature, objects and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent upon reference to the following specification and annexed drawings in which:
The broadcast center 16 includes the necessary apparatus for a scheduling and booking system, described below, to manage use of the bandwidth available on the broadcast network 20. The broadcast request made by the content provider from the scheduler station 14 includes information used by the scheduling and booking system to determine the availability of the requested exact time or other times for transmission of the content. The system operates to determine a transmission time for each broadcast request of a content provider and ensures that at no time will the amount of bandwidth requested exceed the total amount of bandwidth available at the broadcast network 20. This equipment includes a computer of the necessary capacity that operates with an application program to perform the scheduling and booking process, as described below.
This booking process uses the interaction between the booking system at the broadcast center 16 and the request made by a content provider through the scheduler station 14. This is described in
The broadcast plan of
content: e.g. sport news (optional) duration-30 minutes (required) bandwidth required-260 kbit/sec (required) requested broadcast interval start 15:05 (required) end 16:00
where start and end are meant to include date and time. The requested broadcast interval RBI is the time interval specified by the scheduler user during which he or she expects the content to be sent out. As described below in connection with
The goal of the scheduling and booking system at the broadcast center 16 is to verify the availability of broadcast resources in order to accommodate the scheduler user request into the broadcast center.
In the example shown of sports news, the broadcast start and end times are arranged in such a way that the broadcast takes place in the time frame requested by the scheduler user, e.g., start time 15:05 and end time 16:00. The open ended start and end lines could give to the request a lower priority and a lower pricing rate, since the broadcast service provider can satisfy the request at any time that bandwidth is available.
Shown below the program request block R are the already scheduled program content blocks S, with the time being on the horizontal axis and bandwidth (vertical height of the blocks on the vertical axis). The information of each of the blocks S, the schedule of the already accepted booked requests, is already stored in the booking system computer.
A broadcast request preferably is entered in a standard format this is understood by the computer of the scheduler 14 and the booking system. Typically, the scheduler has a data entry screen with fields in which to enter the various request parameters. In S103, the broadcast request is sent to the booking system by the scheduler station 14. A number of requests can be sent in serial form as a batch transmission.
The booking system receives the requests in S105. Each request is checked in S107 for the availability of bandwidth over the required program time duration and usually during a requested specified time frame (start and end time). This is described with respect to
If the transmission cannot be executed as requested, because the time has already been booked and/or there is not enough bandwidth available, as explained in
If no alternate transmission time is found, in S125 the booking system rejects the broadcast request and informs the scheduler station 14 who receives the notice in S127. The content provider typically would then seek another broadcast service provider.
If alternate transmission times are possible to satisfy the request, in S131 the booking system sends a list of these to the scheduler station 14. In S133, the alternate time or times are proposed, such as on a display, to the user at the scheduler station for consideration by the user. In S135 if the user accepts one of the suggested alternatives, this acceptance is sent as a new request to the booking system where it is again checked for availability and booked in S137. A confirmation is sent to the user in S139 and the program is booked for transmission.
While not shown in
In the preferred embodiment of the invention (see
The program content has to be transferred to the broadcast center 16 before the transmission is supposed to start. Content can be uploaded to the broadcast center in two different ways as shown in
1. The content provider sends the actual program content 46 from the scheduler station 14 upon reception in either S111 or S139 of a confirmation of the broadcast request. The content provider can transfer the associated content to the broadcast center by any suitable medium, such as over any standard TCP/IP (Internet) connection designated as an uploader 48. The content is stored at the broadcast center 16 until it is needed for broadcast.
2. The network operator, i.e., broadcast service provider, working directly at the broadcast center can load the content on the content repository of the broadcast center and make it available to the content provider.
The foregoing embodiments demonstrate methods and devices implemented and contemplated by the inventors in making and carrying out the invention. While the invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to the preferred embodiments thereof, the embodiments are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed herein. It will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and detail may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Numerous equivalent methods, devices, and techniques may be employed to achieve the same result. Similarly, any process steps described may be interchangeable with other steps in order to achieve the same result. It is intended that the scope of the invention is defined by the following claims and their equivalents.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US5659350||Dec 2, 1993||Aug 19, 1997||Discovery Communications, Inc.||Operations center for a television program packaging and delivery system|
|US5790070||May 5, 1997||Aug 4, 1998||Motorola, Inc.||Network and method for controlling steerable beams|
|US6016311||Nov 19, 1997||Jan 18, 2000||Ensemble Communications, Inc.||Adaptive time division duplexing method and apparatus for dynamic bandwidth allocation within a wireless communication system|
|US6041359 *||Jun 9, 1997||Mar 21, 2000||Microsoft Corporation||Data delivery system and method for delivering computer data over a broadcast network|
|US6211901||May 21, 1996||Apr 3, 2001||Fujitsu Limited||Video data distributing device by video on demand|
|US6256509||Mar 16, 1999||Jul 3, 2001||Hitachi, Ltd.||Broadcast information delivering system|
|US6374405||Feb 17, 1999||Apr 16, 2002||Opentv, Corp.||Module scheduling with a time interval and ending time|
|US6477707||Mar 24, 1998||Nov 5, 2002||Fantastic Corporation||Method and system for broadcast transmission of media objects|
|US6501770||Jun 26, 2001||Dec 31, 2002||Hughes Electronics Corporation||Dynamic mapping of broadcast resources|
|US6505347||Aug 20, 1998||Jan 7, 2003||Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.||Control information generating apparatus for broadcast system|
|US6529706||Sep 13, 1999||Mar 4, 2003||Rockwell Collins, Inc.||Aircraft satellite communications system for distributing internet service from direct broadcast satellites|
|US6567660||Aug 1, 2000||May 20, 2003||Command Audio Corporation||On-demand information service using wireless cellular communications system|
|US6571391||Oct 16, 1998||May 27, 2003||Lucent Technologies Inc.||System and method for scheduling on-demand broadcasts for heterogeneous workloads|
|US6678740||Jun 23, 2000||Jan 13, 2004||Terayon Communication Systems, Inc.||Process carried out by a gateway in a home network to receive video-on-demand and other requested programs and services|
|US20030140172 *||May 19, 1999||Jul 24, 2003||Randy D. Woods||Distributed computing environment using real-time scheduling logic and time deterministic architecture|
|WO1999049663A1||Mar 24, 1999||Sep 30, 1999||The Fantastic Corporation||Method and system for broadcast transmission of media objects|
|WO2000067449A1||Apr 18, 2000||Nov 9, 2000||Video Networks Incorporated||System and method for dynamic time and bandwidth allocation|
|1||European Application No. 01310260.3, European Search Report, 4 pages, Oct. 1, 2003.|
|2||European Search Report.|
|3||Press Release, "The Fantastic Corporation Launches v2.0 of Industry's Only End-To-End Solutions For Broadband Multimedia," 2 pgs., Apr. 19, 1999.|
|4||Press Release-The Fantastic Corporation Launches v2.0 of Industry's Only End-to-End Solutions for Broadband Multimedia (2 pgs.).|
|5||Press Release—The Fantastic Corporation Launches v2.0 of Industry's Only End-to-End Solutions for Broadband Multimedia (2 pgs.).|
|U.S. Classification||455/3.01, 455/3.03, 455/419, 455/452.1|
|International Classification||H04H20/00, H04N7/16, H04N21/262|
|Cooperative Classification||H04N21/26216, H04N7/165|
|European Classification||H04N21/262C1, H04N7/16E3|
|Jan 12, 2011||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: THE FANTASTIC IP GMBH, SWITZERLAND
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:THE FANTASTIC CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:025627/0895
Effective date: 20050720
Owner name: THE FANTASTIC CORPORATION, SWITZERLAND
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:SALURSO, MARIANNA;CONTI, SILVIA;GULFI, ENRICO;SIGNING DATES FROM 20010403 TO 20010420;REEL/FRAME:025627/0867
|Jan 13, 2011||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: DARBY & MOHAINE, L.L.C., DELAWARE
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:THE FANTASTIC IP GMBH;REEL/FRAME:025631/0179
Effective date: 20060814
|Aug 7, 2012||CC||Certificate of correction|
|Feb 25, 2014||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|Dec 8, 2015||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: RATEZE REMOTE MGMT LLC, DELAWARE
Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:DARBY & MOHAINE, L.L.C.;REEL/FRAME:037237/0075
Effective date: 20150826