|Publication number||USRE43362 E1|
|Application number||US 12/354,415|
|Publication date||May 8, 2012|
|Filing date||Jan 15, 2009|
|Priority date||Aug 6, 2001|
|Also published as||US7164779, US20030026449|
|Publication number||12354415, 354415, US RE43362 E1, US RE43362E1, US-E1-RE43362, USRE43362 E1, USRE43362E1|
|Inventors||William S. Yerazunis, Darren L. Leigh, Marco S. Carbone|
|Original Assignee||Binary Services Limited Liability Company|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (20), Non-Patent Citations (2), Referenced by (5), Classifications (22), Legal Events (5)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
The present invention relates generally to the field of data security, and more particularity to displaying secure data on display devices in public locations.
With the advent of desktop and portable computer systems, the problem of maintaining the confidentiality of secure data is increased. This is a particular problem for laptop computers and hand-held personal digital assistants (PDAs) that are frequently used in public locations. Data security is also a problem for other display systems, such as automated teller machines, and Internet terminals in public locations, such as Internet shops and airports.
In recent years, a great deal of effort has been expended on making flat panel display screens as readable as CRT screens by using active matrix technology. However, enhanced readability of displayed data increases the risk of confidential information being viewable by unauthorized persons when portable displays are used in public locations.
One solution is to provide the display with physical “blinders” mounted on the side of the display to limit the angle at which the display can be seen. Another type of mechanical solution uses microscopic louvers to obscure the screen to any viewer not along the axis of the louvers. However, this does not prevent viewing by a person sitting directly behind the user of the display. In addition, this type of arrangement does not allow the user to leave the equipment unattended.
One manufacturer, InvisiView Technologies, Inc., Boca Raton, Fla., removes the front polarizer from a LCD type of device so the displayed image is no longer visible. If the display is viewed through polarized lenses, it becomes visible. This is a partial solution because anyone wearing consumer-grade polarized sunglasses can defeat the system.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,528,319 “Privacy filter for a display device” issued to Austin on Jun. 18, 1996 describes a privacy filter constructed of spaced-apart opaque grids that can be fitted to a display device. The problems with this arrangement is that it requires physical modification of the device, and like the blinders above, only limits the angle at which the display can be viewed.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,629,984 “System and method for data security” issued to McManis on May 13, 1997 describes a display system that alternates data frames with flash frames where an overwhelming majority of pixels are illuminated so that the flash frames have an average intensity substantially greater than the data frames. The user views the display with a shutter device that is synchronized to the displayed frames. The shutter is open for the data frames, and closed for the flash frames. The interspersed flash frames are intended to make it difficult for a viewer without the optical shutter device to intelligibly read the data frames.
The problem with this system is that most people can perceive images even is the relative intensity of darkest elements is only about 1/100 that of the brightest elements. In other words, the intensity of the flash frames would have to be increased by at least 20 db in order for the device to be effective. In a practical LCD applications, the display elements are usually driven at full power to maximize brightness. Therefore, it is problematic whether the driving voltage can be increased by a factor of a hundred. Even if the flash frames can be displayed, it is well known that over illuminating the display screen greatly shortens its useable life-span. In addition, the flash frames would attract attention to bystanders, and the device is more susceptible to counter attacks.
The invention provides a method for displaying an image only to an authorized user by generating a mask image from a data image. The data and mask image are then displayed periodically in an alternating manner on a display device by a select signal. The opening and shutting of an optical shutter device is synchronized to the displaying of the selected images so that only the data image is perceived by the authorized user viewing the display device through the optical shutter device, and a gray image is perceived by an unauthorized user viewing the data and mask images directly. Alternatively, the displaying and operation of the optical shutter device can be in a random order that is only known to the display device and the shutter. In another alternative, the displaying and operation of the optical shutter device is done on a per pixel basis, either randomly or periodically.
Movies, televisions and computerized display devices normally display frames at a predetermined frame rate, e.g., twenty-four per second or higher. Persistence in the human visual system causes the rapidly displayed frames to merge into a continuous image. In the present invention, this persistence is used to enable privacy-enhanced display devices.
As shown in
The net result is a featureless neutral “gray” image 103 because the overall perceived intensity of the image is half-way between sum of the intensities of the data and mask frames. Thus, privacy of the displayed information is preserved. It should be understood that frames of a video can be similarly be processed in sequence.
A user 130 perceives only the data frames 101 by viewing the neutral images 103 through a shutter device 140 that is synchronized 104 in phase and frequency to the frame rate of the display device 120. Frequency synchronization can be done internally to the optical shutter device 140. The shutter device 140 is open for the data frames 101 and closed for the mask frames 102 so that only the phase needs to be synchronized.
One type of shutter device can use modified CrystalEyes™ eyewear manufactured by StereoGraphics Corporation of San Rafael, Calif. and described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 44,967,268, 5,117,302, 5,181,133, and 5,463,428 incorporated herein by reference. The unmodified glasses operate the left and right lenses sequentially for stereoscopic viewing, the modified lenses operate in parallel.
However, nematic liquid-crystal stereographic shutter glasses are typically limited to an operating frequency of 60 Hz, or less. This leads to noticeable flickering in the perceived image. Therefore, our shutter device 140 includes polarizing lenses 141-142 on either side of a ferro-electric liquid crystal (FLC) polarization rotator 143. The FLC rotator can switch polarization rotation from +π/4 to −πpi/4 at a frequency up to about 100 KHz, when driven by a bipolar ±5.0 volt control line 144 to take advantage of faster displays.
Wire or wireless, e.g., infra-red, communication can be used to synchronize to the phase of the display device 120. This allows the display device according to the invention to be used concurrently by multiple users in a public location without requiring a physical link between the users and the display device.
For safety and ease-of-use reasons, the optical shutter device 140 operates continuously while worn by the user so that the user's environment remains visible even if the user is not in range of the display unit. Thus, the synchronization signal 104 only needs to control the phase, and not the frequency or amplitude, of the select signal 161.
If the data frames 101 are binary or two-tone image, then a negation simply means turning all white components of the data frames, e.g., pixels with zero or off values, to black components in the negative frames, e.g. pixels with one or on values. If the data frame use a gray scale, then the negation simply subtracts the pixel values of the data frames from the maximum pixel value, i.e., 255 for an eight bit pixel value.
Although a primary use of the invention is with portable display devices, it should be noted that the display system as described above can use any number of illumination techniques including CRT, LCD, LED, laser, digital projector—rear- or front, large or small, and so forth.
In the case of color images, the negation is performed independently on each of the color channels, e.g., red, green, and blue for a “RGB” display system. Thus, for a system that display each of red, green, and blue at 256 levels, such as commonly available 24-bit (3×8) color mode display devices, each pixel of the red negative frame is displayed at a value of 255 minus the corresponding red data frame pixel value. Similarly, the values for the green and blue channels are determined.
The intensity of the light generated by most display devices is usually not a linear function of the applied signal. A conventional CRT has a power-law response to voltage. Therefore, the intensity of the light produced at the face of the screen of the display is approximately the applied voltage, raised to the 2.2 power. The numerical value of the exponent of this power function is colloquially known as gamma (γ). This non-linearity must be compensated for in the negated frames.
To do this correction for a typical CRT type of display device, the input pixel values from 0 to 255, after negation, are remapped to output pixel values according to
where γ is obtained from the display device CRT manufacturer's specifications.
The scaling and off-setting are such that the intensity values of the mask image 240 are within the dynamic range of the display device. If the normalized dynamic range of the display device is 0 to 1, and the respective scaling factors are α and β, and the off-sets A and B, then α+β≦1, and α+A≦B. These inequalities constrain the respective dynamic ranges of the perceived public image 261 and the perceived secret images 262. A high-dynamic-range public image forces a low-dynamic-range, dim perceived secret image, and vice versa. If α=β, and A=0.0 and B=0.5, the perceived public and secret images will be of equal quality. The perceived public image will lower in contrast with an elevated black level, and the perceived secret image will be dimmer, but still within a brightness range for acceptable viewing.
The above described display devices provide a reasonable level of privacy for the casual user. However, because the displayed images alternate at a constant frequency, e.g., 60 Hz, the system is still open to attack by a persistent snooper. By scanning through the frequency range, a snooper could determined the frequency of the alternating display.
In the case of a wireless interconnection, two pseudo-random generators can be used. Each is initialized to the same state and so will produce the same random sequence. One sequence is used in the display device, and the other in the optical shutter device. Synchronization between the sequences can be done as described above.
A coder 320 converts each zero bit to a pair of select signals [0,1], and each one bit to a pair of select signals [1,0]. The resulting coding sequences 321-322 are fed, in parallel, to the display device 120 and a shutter device 140 to perform the appropriate selection of the order of displayed images. Note, the pairs in the select signals 321 and 322 ensure that each successive pair of input frames 340 will alternate, so the perceived effect will be as above, with the added advantage that it is impossible for a snooper to determine the random sequence 311, without direct access to the equipment.
So far, we have assumed that pixels are displayed and perceived in a parallel manner. This is effectively true for most LCD and CRT devices. Even though the pixels are initially generated in a serial beam and displayed in a raster scan order on a CRT, the relatively long decay time of the physical display elements, e.g., phosphor dots, parallelizes the perceived illumination. Consequently, the optical shutter device can operates at the frame rate of the display device.
For a device where the pixels can truly be displayed in a serial manner, e.g., LEDs, FLCs, or laser displays, we can modify the above encoding technique to further enhance the security of the displayed images.
In this embodiment, the input image is in the form of a serial stream of pixel values 350, e.g., zeroes and ones for a binary image or byte values for gray-scale and color images. Now, we modulate the pixels and shutter on a per pixel basis. For every zero value in the coding sequence 321 we display the correct pixel value, and for every one bit in the coding sequence, we negate the pixel value, as described above with reference to
In the case where the display device 120 uses a low-powered liquid crystal display (LCD), such as used with many portable display systems, additional enhancement can be made, as shown in
Therefore, our LCD 400 is constructed as follows. A first polarizer (P1) 401 is disposes between a backlight (B) 420 and a first optical rotator element (R1) 430. The backlight is a source of incident light of mixed polarization. We omit the customary other polarizer found in conventional LCDs. In this embodiment, the optical shutter device 440 includes a second optical rotator element (R2) 411 and a second polarizer (P2) 412. An input image 400 is modulated 420 by angle of polarization. The modulation can be regular or random as described above.
If the images is viewed by the unaided eye, then it appears uniformly white. If the image is viewed through standard polarizing lenses, as for the prior art InvisiView device, it is still unreadable. However, when the image is viewed through the optical shutter device 410 modulated synchronously to the image 400, the image will become visible.
The modulation of the rotators can be done adding ±45° off-set to the normal polarization modulation. This can be done by biasing the overall screen voltage, because in the LCD, the amount of rotation is substantially linearly proportional to the driving voltage. As described above, the modulation of the rotators can be done periodically or randomly, depending on the level of security desired.
Thus, areas of the image that appear bright in one polarization direction appear dark in a perpendicular direction, and these are reverse whenever the +45 to −45 degree rotational voltage modulation occurs. The result is as before, the screen appears a featureless gray to unauthorized viewers, even those wearing polarizing sunglasses, and only properly modulated shutter devices will make the image 400 visible.
This invention is described using specific terms and examples. It is to be understood that various other adaptations and modifications may be made within the spirit and scope of the invention. Therefore, it is the object of the appended claims to cover all such variations and modifications as come within the true spirit and scope of the invention.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4870486 *||Jul 20, 1988||Sep 26, 1989||Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha||Virtual stereographic display system|
|US4967268||Jul 31, 1989||Oct 30, 1990||Stereographics||Liquid crystal shutter system for stereoscopic and other applications|
|US5063602||Mar 26, 1991||Nov 5, 1991||Nippon Sheet Glass Co., Ltd.||Image correlation calculation apparatus|
|US5117302||Sep 19, 1991||May 26, 1992||Stereographics Corporation||High dynamic range electro-optical shutter for steroscopic and other applications|
|US5181133||May 15, 1991||Jan 19, 1993||Stereographics Corporation||Drive method for twisted nematic liquid crystal shutters for stereoscopic and other applications|
|US5463428||Feb 8, 1994||Oct 31, 1995||Stereographics Corporation||Wireless active eyewear for stereoscopic applications|
|US5488492||Jun 3, 1994||Jan 30, 1996||Asahi Kogaku Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha||Apparatus for adjusting color tone of image to be recorded|
|US5528319||Nov 8, 1994||Jun 18, 1996||Photran Corporation||Privacy filter for a display device|
|US5583674||Feb 28, 1996||Dec 10, 1996||Gec-Marconi Ltd.||Multilayered display having two displays in series and a switchable optical retarder|
|US5629984||Mar 10, 1995||May 13, 1997||Sun Microsystems, Inc.||System and method for data security|
|US5717412||Jan 3, 1996||Feb 10, 1998||Sonics Associates, Inc.||3-D glasses with variable duty cycle shutter lenses|
|US5963371||Feb 4, 1998||Oct 5, 1999||Intel Corporation||Method of displaying private data to collocated users|
|US5991426||Dec 18, 1998||Nov 23, 1999||Signafy, Inc.||Field-based watermark insertion and detection|
|US6018331||Dec 4, 1997||Jan 25, 2000||Nec Corporation||Frame display control in an image display having a liquid crystal display panel|
|US6128049||Jan 29, 1999||Oct 3, 2000||Hewlett-Packard Company||Use of shutter to control the illumination period in a ferroelectric liquid crystal-based spatial light modulator display device|
|US6421109||Oct 15, 1999||Jul 16, 2002||Digilens, Inc.||Method and system for display resolution multiplication|
|US6456432 *||Sep 30, 1998||Sep 24, 2002||Reveo, Inc.||Stereoscopic 3-d viewing system with portable electro-optical viewing glasses and shutter-state control signal transmitter having multiple modes of operation for stereoscopic viewing of 3-d images displayed in different stereoscopic image formats|
|US6597328||Aug 16, 2000||Jul 22, 2003||International Business Machines Corporation||Method for providing privately viewable data in a publically viewable display|
|US6661425||Aug 18, 2000||Dec 9, 2003||Nec Corporation||Overlapped image display type information input/output apparatus|
|US6784887 *||Apr 24, 2000||Aug 31, 2004||Minolta Co., Ltd.||Image processing device|
|1||Alfred Poor, "InvisiView Makes your Notebook Snoop-Proof"; PC Magazine Online, Jul. 19, 2001.|
|2||InvisiView Technologies. www.man-machine.com/invisivw.html. Jul. 19, 2001.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US8817043 *||Apr 24, 2009||Aug 26, 2014||Disney Enterprises, Inc.||System and method for selective viewing of a hidden presentation within a displayed presentation|
|US8890892||Nov 12, 2009||Nov 18, 2014||Pixar||System and method for steganographic image display|
|US9690763||Nov 10, 2014||Jun 27, 2017||Bryant Christopher Lee||Display of webpage elements on a connected computer|
|US20100271396 *||Apr 24, 2009||Oct 28, 2010||Disney Enterprises, Inc.||System and method for selective viewing of a hidden presentation within a displayed presentation|
|US20110122152 *||Nov 12, 2009||May 26, 2011||Pixar Animation Studios||System and method for steganographic image display|
|U.S. Classification||382/100, 348/56, 359/464, 345/629, 348/43, 348/53, 382/213, 359/465, 382/214, 345/634, 345/690, 382/283|
|International Classification||G09G5/10, G09G3/36, G06K9/36, G06K9/00, G06K9/20, G09G5/00, G06K9/74|
|Cooperative Classification||G09G3/3611, G09G5/00|
|Jun 10, 2009||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: BINARY SERVICES LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, DELAWAR
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC RESEARCH LABORATORIES, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022809/0129
Effective date: 20071207
|Oct 23, 2012||CC||Certificate of correction|
|Jun 24, 2014||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|Sep 23, 2015||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: BENHOV GMBH, LLC, DELAWARE
Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:BENHOV GMBH, LLC;REEL/FRAME:036637/0365
Effective date: 20150811
|Sep 24, 2015||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: BENHOV GMBH, LLC, DELAWARE
Free format text: CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNOR NAME PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 036637 FRAME: 0365.ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE MERGER;ASSIGNOR:BINARY SERVICES LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:036687/0182
Effective date: 20150811