Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUSRE43441 E1
Publication typeGrant
Application numberUS 13/107,688
Publication dateJun 5, 2012
Filing dateJul 13, 2000
Priority dateJul 13, 1999
Publication number107688, 13107688, US RE43441 E1, US RE43441E1, US-E1-RE43441, USRE43441 E1, USRE43441E1
InventorsDavid Stirling Taylor
Original AssigneeStirling Mouldings Limited
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Flexible material
US RE43441 E1
Abstract
A flexible material includes a plurality of separate resilient elements joined to a flexible, resiliently stretchable substrate. Such a material is suitable for providing protective war for human and animal bodies. Preferably, the elements includes a foam material such as a closed cell polyethylene foam and the substrate includes a knitted fabric. In an advantageous embodiment, a second flexible substrate is bonded over the elements to sandwich them between the two layers of substrate.
Images(4)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(33)
1. A method of manufacturing a flexible material comprising the steps of
providing a sheet of a resilient material;
cutting the sheet into a plurality of spaced separate elements using a cutter which is pressed into the sheet to cut therethrough;
making one side of the plurality of spaced separate elements to stand proud of a surface of a jig provided to hold the elements in place; and
bonding a flexible resiliently stretchable substrate to one side of the separate elements by heating the substrate either to activate an adhesive applied between said one side of the separate elements and the substrate or to weld the separate elements to the substrate.
2. The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the sheet is cut into a plurality of separate elements using a cutter which acts as the jig after cutting through the resilient material to hold the elements in place while the substrate is applied thereto.
3. The method as claimed in claim 2, wherein the cutter is adapted so that said one side of each of the cut elements is made to stand proud of a surface of the cutter after cutting through said sheet of resilient material.
4. The method as claimed in claim 3, wherein any excess resilient material located between the plurality of spaced separate elements is retained in the cutter.
5. The method as claimed in claim 3, wherein any excess resilient material is removed from between the plurality of spaced separate elements prior to the elements being bonded to the substrate.
6. The method as claimed in any of claim 1, wherein the plurality of spaced separate elements comprise a foam material.
7. The method as claimed in claim 1, further comprising:
bonding a second flexible substrate to an opposite side of the plurality of spaced separate elements to said one side.
8. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein at least said one side of the sheet is coated with a hot-melt adhesive prior to being cut into the plurality of spaced separate elements.
9. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the side of the substrate adjacent said one side of the plurality of spaced separate elements is coated with a hot-melt adhesive.
10. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein a sheet of hot-melt film is interposed between said one side of the plurality of spaced separate elements and the substrate so as to provide said adhesive.
11. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the sheet of resilient material is cut into strips in a first direction using a plurality of rolling cutters and then cut in a second direction at an angle to the first direction to form the plurality of spaced separate elements.
12. The method as claimed in claim 11 wherein the rolling cutters are moved sideways after each cut to cut narrow strips of material in both directions to space the elements apart, the narrow strips of material being removed to leave the plurality of spaced separate elements spaced from one another.
13. The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the substrate is heated by a heated platen which either activates the adhesive or melts the surface and thereby bonds the substrate and the plurality of spaced separate elements together.
14. The method as claimed claim 10, wherein the substrate is heated by passing the substrate and the adjacent plurality of spaced separate elements between heated nip rollers.
15. A method of manufacturing a flexible resiliently compressible material, the method comprising:
providing a first resiliently stretchable fabric substrate;
cutting a sheet of resiliently compressible foam with a cutter that goes completely through the foam to provide a plurality of separate individual resiliently compressible elements in a spaced apart relationship, the separate elements having a top surface and bottom surface;
providing a second resiliently stretchable fabric substrate;
contacting the top surfaces and the bottom surfaces of the plurality of resiliently compressible elements with the first and second resiliently stretchable fabric substrates;
bonding the top surfaces of the plurality of separate individual compressible elements to the first resiliently stretchable fabric substrate while adjacent elements are held so that a distance between the adjacent elements is about 2 mm, the bonding selected from the group consisting of adhesively bonding and welding; and
bonding the bottom surfaces of the plurality of separate individual compressible elements to the second resiliently stretchable fabric substrate while adjacent elements are at the distance of about 2 mm, the bonding selected from the group consisting of adhesively bonding and welding, to provide the flexible resiliently compressible material with the plurality of separate resiliently compressible elements being distributed between the substrates at a density of from about 250 to about 8000 elements/m2, and the first and second substrates not bonded to each other between the adjacent elements.
16. The method according to claim 15 wherein the elements are distributed between the substrates at a density of from about 4000 to about 8000 elements/m2.
17. The method according to claim 15 wherein the top and bottom surfaces of the elements are flat.
18. The method according to claim 17 wherein the elements are distributed between the substrates at a density of from about 4000 to about 6000 elements/m2.
19. The method according to claim 15 wherein the elements are comprised of layers of foam having different densities.
20. The method according to claims 15 wherein the elements are comprised of polyethylene foam.
21. A method of manufacturing a flexible resiliently compressible material, the method comprising:
cutting a sheet of resiliently compressible foam with a cutter that goes completely through the foam to provide a plurality of separate individual resiliently compressible elements with side walls of adjacent elements being spaced apart at a distance of about 2 mm, the separate individual elements having a top surface and bottom surface;
holding the separate individual elements;
bonding the top surfaces of the separate individual compressible elements to a first resiliently stretchable fabric substrate while adjacent elements are held so that the distance of about 2 mm is between the side walls of the adjacent elements, the bonding selected from the group consisting of adhesively bonding and welding; and
bonding the bottom surfaces of the separate resiliently compressible elements to a second resiliently stretchable fabric substrate to provide the resiliently compressible material with the fabric substrates not bonded to each other between the separate elements while walls of adjacent elements are held about 2 mm apart and the separate elements being distributed between the substrates at a density of from about 250 to about 8000 elements/m2.
22. The method according to claim 21 wherein the separate elements are distributed between the substrates at a density of from about 4000 to about 6000 elements/m2.
23. The method according to claim 22 wherein the top and bottom surfaces of the separate elements are flat.
24. The method according to claim 23 wherein the separate elements are comprised of layers of foam having different densities.
25. The method according to claim 21 wherein the top and bottom surfaces of the separate elements are flat.
26. The method according to claim 25 wherein the separate elements are comprised of layers of foam having different densities.
27. The method according to claim 26 wherein the separate elements are distributed between the substrates at a density of from about 4000 to about 6000 elements/m2.
28. The method of claim 26 wherein the layers of foam having different densities are closed cell foam.
29. The method according to claim 21 wherein the separate elements are comprised of layers of foam having different densities.
30. The method according to claim 21 wherein the separate elements are comprised of closed cell foam.
31. The method according to claims 21 wherein the separate elements are comprised of polyethylene foam.
32. A method of manufacturing a flexible resiliently compressible material, the method comprising:
providing a first resiliently stretchable fabric substrate;
cutting a sheet of resiliently compressible foam with a cutting grid that goes completely through the foam to provide a plurality of separate individual resiliently compressible elements in a spaced apart relationship, separate individual elements of the plurality of resiliently compressible elements having top surfaces and bottom surface which are flat;
providing a second resiliently stretchable fabric substrate;
contacting top surfaces and bottom surfaces of the plurality of resiliently compressible elements with the first and second resiliently stretchable fabric substrates;
holding the separate individual resiliently compressible elements in spaced apart relation after the cutting grid cuts the resiliently compressible foam;
bonding the top surfaces of the resiliently compressible elements to the first resiliently stretchable fabric substrate while adjacent elements are held so that a distance between the elements is about 2 mm, the bonding selected from the group consisting of adhesively bonding and welding; and
bonding the bottom surfaces of the resiliently compressible elements to the second resiliently stretchable fabric substrate while adjacent elements are at a distance of about 2 mm, the bonding selected from the group consisting of adhesively bonding and welding, to provide the resiliently compressible material with the fabric substrates not bonded to each other between adjacent individual elements and to provide the flexible resiliently compressible material with the individual resiliently compressible elements being distributed between the substrates at a density of from about 250 to about 8000 elements/m2.
33. A method of manufacturing a flexible resiliently compressible material, the method comprising:
providing a first resiliently stretchable fabric substrate;
cutting a sheet of resiliently compressible foam with a cutting grid that goes completely through the foam to provide a plurality of separate individual resiliently compressible elements, the separate individual elements having a top surface and a bottom surface;
providing a second resiliently stretchable fabric substrate;
holding the plurality of separate individual resiliently compressible elements so that adjacent separate elements are at a distance of about 2 mm after cutting the resiliently compressible foam;
bonding the top surfaces of the separate compressible elements to one of the first and second resiliently stretchable fabric substrates while the plurality of separate individual resiliently compressible elements are at a distance of about 2 mm between adjacent separate elements to provide a fabric/element combination; and
bonding one of the first and second fabric substrates to the surface of the elements of the fabric/element combination to provide the resiliently compressible material, the bonding selected from the group consisting of adhesively bonding and welding, the fabric substrates of the resiliently compressible material not bonded to each other between the adjacent separate elements and the separate elements being distributed between the substrates at a density of from about 250 to about 8000 elements/m2.
Description
RELATED U.S. APPLICATIONS

Not applicable.

Notice: multiple reissue applications have been filed for the reissue of U.S. Pat. No. 6,743,325. This application is a continuation reissue application of reissue application Ser. No. 12/642,522, filed on Dec. 18, 2009, which is a continuation reissue application of Ser. No. 11/269,919, filed on Nov. 8, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. Re. 41,346, which is a reissue application of U.S. Pat. No. 6,743,325, filed as application Ser. No. 10/030,782 on Apr. 23, 2002, which claims priority to PCT/GB00/02687 filed Jul. 13, 2000; GB99/16291 filed Jul. 13, 1999; and GB 99/21804 filed Sep. 16, 1999; all of which are hereby fully incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.

STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT

Not applicable.

REFERENCE TO MICROFICHE APPENDIX

Not applicable.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to a method of manufacturing a flexible material suitable, primarily, for use as a flexible protective material to protect for human and animal bodies.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Protective material and protective wear is currently used by persons to protect themselves from knocks, abrasions and other injury. Protective wear is used during sport, rugby for example and equestrian sports and other activities where a person runs a risk of injury, for example building and other trades.

Conventional protective wear may form an integral part of an item of clothing, for example a shoulder pad, or be provided separately, for example a shin pad.

One existing arrangement comprises a moulded foam article shaped to fit a particular part of the body. There are, however, a number of problems with this arrangement. The article must be produced in different sizes to fit different people. Provision of different sizes can be expensive or inconvenient. Also, closely fitting articles can restrict movement of the wearer, especially when worn on or near joints.

In DE 43 41 722 is disclosed a cushioning material for the treatment of lymphostatic fibroses in which a plurality of foam elements with an enlarged base are disposed side-by-side with their bases touching on a foundation layer to which they are affixed. The troughs defined between the side walls of the elements enable the material to be flexed to form a pressure bandage. However, the foram elements of the bandage touch one another at their base, which restricts the stretchability of the material as a whole and is also designed to be worn with the elements in contact with the skin, which would restrict movement.

A moulded foam article can only correctly fit a joint when in one position. When the joint moves, the article will no longer fit correctly. This may reduce the protection it affords.

In U.S. Pat. No. 3,285,768 is disclosed a fabric coated with a surface deformed foam which is manufactured either by grooving or slashing a sheet of foam to a portion of its depth and then laminating it to the fabric or by laminating a foam sheet to a fabric and then grooving or slashing the form layer. However, neither of these methods enables the foam to be cut to define a plurality of spaced, separate elements, which is preferred if the fabric is to be used in protective wear for ,sports persons when considerable freedom of movement by the wearer is required in addition to comfort.

Another existing arrangement comprises a quilted material including lengths of foam sewn into pockets formed between two layers of fabric. Such materials are time consuming to produce. Also, such materials can generally only easily be flexed in a direction perpendicular to that of the strips of foam. Flexing the material in a direction along the length of the strips involves flexing the strips themselves which, depending on the type of foam used, can be difficult. A similar type of garment is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,551,082 which describes an athletic garment in which strategically placed rib-shaped gel, air or foam padding is contained in envelopes that are individually affixed to an elasticized fabric shell.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

It is an object of the present invention to overcome, or at least reduce, the problems associated with the manufacture of conventional protective material and with protective wear made therefrom.

According to a first aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of manufacturing a flexible material comprising the steps of providing a sheet of a resilient material; cutting the sheet into a plurality of spaced, separate elements using a cutter which is pressed into the sheet to cut therethrough; making one side of the spaced elements to stand proud of the surface of a jig provided to hold the elements in place; and bonding a flexible, resiliently stretchable substrate to one side of the separate elements by heating the substrate either to active an adhesive applied between said one side of the separate elements and the substrate or to weld the elements to the substrate.

The separate elements are preferably bonded to the substrate with a hot melt adhesive, although they can be welded thereto using heat to fuse the elements to the substrate.

According to a second aspect of the present invention there is provided a flexible material comprising a layer of separate resilient elements joined to a flexible, resiliently stretchable substrate and manufactured according to the method of the first aspect of the present invention.

Such a flexible material can confirm more easily to the body of the wearer than conventional materials, as it is flexible in all three dimensions. It is therefore more comfortable to wear and can accommodate movement better than conventional materials. When used as a protective material or to form protective wear a single size, or a reduced number of sizes, can fit many different sized bodies.

As the elements are separate and spaced apart; this facilitates flexing of the substrate to form a curved surface and enables the material to flex in all directions without “locking up” or preventing movement in a particular direction. This is a particular advantage the flexible material of the present invention has over prior art arrangements which tend not to exhibit universal flexibility.

The elements preferably comprise a resilient foam material, for example a closed cell polyethylene, and could comprise a number of different types of foam or other materials to give desired properties, for example layers of foam of different densities.

The elements may be substantially identical, alternatively they can be of different size and shape, for example to fit comfortably part of a wearer's body, or some other article.

The elements preferably take the form of blocks. They can be of regular or irregular shape, for example hexagonal or octagonal in cross-section. The elements are preferably evenly distributed on the substrate with a density of between 100 and 8000 elements/m2, more preferably between 250 and 8000 elements/m2, and still more preferably between 4000 and 6000 elements/m2. In one embodiment, the elements comprise cubes of side 12 mm spaced apart by 2 mm. This gives a density of about 5000 cubes/m2. This allows the material to flex easily along all directions, an improvement over known quilted protective materials. Also, one type of material can be cut to many different sizes, for example to form protective wear of different sizes, without significantly affecting its ability to flex. This is in contrast to known quilted protective materials wherein due to the size of the foam strips, the size of each strip must be changed to form an article of different size without reducing flexibility.

The substrate is resiliently stretchable or elastic and preferably comprises a fabric, although a resiliently stretchable film or sheet could be used. This enables the material to adopt a greater range of configurations. Suitable fabrics include knitted nylon and polyester fabrics and more particularly those materials comprising elastane.

A second layer of a flexible substrate material is preferably bonded over the elements so that they are sandwiched between two layers. In this case, as the first substrate layer is resiliently stretchable or elastic, this helps to prevent puckering of one side of the material when it is flexed. Advantageously, both substrate layers are resiliently stretchable. However, in cases where only a single stretchable substrate layer is provided and the material is to be used in a curved configuration the material is preferably arranged so that the stretchable layer lies on the outside surface of the curve.

The material may be comprised in clothing or other wear. It is particularly suitable for incorporation into protective clothing and wear, for example shoulder pads, knee pads, shin pads, arm bands, head-guards, vests and gauntlets for both humans and animals. It will be appreciated that in these garments the blocks are provided where required and omitted from certain areas of the garment. For example, in a headguard no blocks need be positioned in the ear-flaps of the guard.

The material could also be comprised in furniture or upholstery and can be particularly useful when used with wheelchairs and hospital beds. Spaced part elements can help to reduce the incidence of bed sores. As the material is resilient, it comprises a cushioning medium, for,; example for saddles. Where the material comprises a foam layer, this provides it with good thermally insulating properties and it can be usefully incorporated into, or used to form wet suits. A foam layer can also render the material buoyant in water, in which case it can be usefully used in or to form buoyancy vests, life jackets and swimming aids. When used as a swimming aid, for example, the material can be incorporated in swimming costumes as an aid to the buoyancy of the wearer. It is possible in this case to arrange for the foam blocks to be progressively removable from the costume as the confidence and skill or the trainee swimmer increases.

The material may also be used for packaging and cladding.

As indicated above, the elements may not be distributed all over the surface of the substrate. In particular, there may be a border of substrate having no element thereon. The border may include a fastening means, for example VELCRO(™) to enable it to be affixed to itself or to another article, say a garment.

In one embodiment, the elements could comprise a series of spaced-apart strips. Such a material would have different properties when flexed in different directions.

Preferably, at least said one side of the elements are coated with the hot-melt adhesive prior to being cut into the separate elements. Alternatively or in addition, the side of the substrate adjacent said one side of the elements is coated with the hot-melt adhesive. A sheet of hot-melt film may also be interposed between said one side of the elements and the substrate to provide said adhesive layer.

Advantageously, the resilient sheet is cut into a plurality of separate elements using a cutter which acts as the jig after cutting through the resilient material to hold the elements in place while the substrate layer is applied thereto. Preferably, the cutter is adapted so that said one side of each, now cut, element are made to stand proud of the surface of the cutter grid. The sheet material may spring back slightly after cutting to accomplish this. Alternatively, means, such as ejectors, are provided to achieve this effect.

In one embodiment of the method, a sheet of a resilient material is provided and at least one side of the sheet is coated with a hot melt adhesive. The sheet is placed, adhesive side up, over a cutter grid arranged to cut the sheet into a plurality of elements, for example squares. The sheet is pressed down onto the cutter to cut through the sheet. Excess material from between the elements is then removed. A resiliently stretchable substrate is placed over the, now cut, sheet and heated to activate the adhesive to join the elements to the substrate. The substrate is then lifted away from the cutter, taking the elements with it.

It will be appreciated that in this embodiment, the cutter grid acts as a jig, holding the elements in placed while the substrate layer is applied. If the flexible material is to be cut into large pieces, in particular large irregularly shaped pieces, then these pieces may be assembled into a specially constructed jig to hold them into place before application of the substrate. Conveniently, as before the sheet of resilient material from which the elements are cut has an adhesive layer applied to one or both surfaces prior to the cutting process.

Alternatively, the sheet of resilient material is cut into strips in a first direction using a plurality of rolling cutters and then cut in a second direction at an angle to the first direction to the separate elements. Preferably, the rolling cutters are moved sideways after each cut to cut narrow strips of material in both directions to space the elements apart, the narrow strips of material being removed to leave the separate elements spaced apart from one another.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS

Embodiments of the various aspects of the invention will now be described by way of example with reference to the accompanying drawings.

FIG. 1 is an enlarged perspective view of part piece of flexible material according to the invention.

FIG. 2 shows a schematic view of a protective arm band formed from the type of material of FIG. 1.

FIG. 3 is a plan view of a cutter grid.

FIGS. 4 to 6 are vertical cross-sectional views of apparatus used in the manufacture of material as shown in FIG. 1 at various stages respectively throughout the manufacturing process.

FIG. 7 is a cross-sectional view through another embodiment of a flexible material according to the invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Referring to FIG. 1, a flexible material comprises a plurality of cubes 1 of a resilient closed-cell polyethylene foam, of side approximately 12 mm and with corners of radius approximately 2.5 mm, joined with a hot melt adhesive to a fabric substrate 2. The cubes 1 are evenly arranged, each cube being spaced from adjacent cubes by approximately 2 mm. The fabric 2 is a resiliently stretchable knitted fabric, preferably one comprising polyester or elastane fibers.

A margin of fabric 2 is provided around the periphery of the cubes 1. Along the edges of the fabric at opposite ends respectively there are strips 3 of VELCRO(™), only one of which is shown.

Referring to FIG. 2, a protective armband 4 is shown being worn on part of an arm 5. The armband 4 is formed from a generally rectangular piece of material of the type shown in FIG. 1 but which in this case comprises a fabric substrate 6 bonded to both sides thereof with a plurality of foam cubes 7 sandwiched therebetween. Margins are provided at opposite ends respectively of the substrate 6 and a strip of VELCRO(™) 8 is fastened on this margin to enable opposite ends of the material to be fastened in an overlaying relationship to form a tube. By varying the degree of overlap of the ends, the tube can be closely fitted around arms of different sizes. The provision of a substrate layer 6 on both sides of the cubes 7 prevents the latter from separating too much as the material is curved around to form a tube. Rather, the substrate 6 on the outside of the armband is forced to stretch and the edges of the cubes 7 at the inner side of the armband are compressed. The provision of a substrate layer on both sides of the material therefore enables the material to continue to provide good protection, even when tightly flexed.

FIG. 3 shows a plan view of a cutter used for manufacturing the material of FIG. 1. The cutter comprises blades defining a plurality of squares of 12 mm side with corners of radius 2.5 mm.

FIGS. 4 to 6 are vertical cross-sectional views of apparatus at various stages respectively throughout the manufacture of the flexible material shown in FIG. 1. Referring to these figures, one side of a 12 mm thick layer of closed cell polyethylene foam 10 is coated with a hot melt adhesive 11. The foam 10 is then placed onto a cutter 12, of the type shown in FIG. 3, and pressed down with a press 13 so that the cutter 12 cuts through the foam 10 to form a plurality of separate cubes. The press is then removed, whereupon owing to its resilient nature, the foam will tend to spring back slightly so that the exposed surface of each cube stands proud to lie above the surface of the cutter. Excess material from between the elements is then removed.

Next, as shown in FIG. 5, a layer of fabric is placed over the foam and cutter 12 and a heated platen 15 is brought into contact with the fabric 14. Heat is conducted through the fabric 14 to the foam and activates the adhesive, bonding the fabric 14 to the foam 10. In this arrangement, the cutter grid acts as a jig, holding the foam cubes in position whilst the fabric substrate 14 is applied thereto.

Then, as shown in FIG. 6, the fabric can be lifted away from the cutter taking the foam cubes 10 with it.

In an alternative method, ejectors are disposed in the cutter grid to eject the elements, leaving any waste material behind in the cutters.

If the foam 10 is to be cut into large pieces, in particular large irregularly shaped pieces such as may be suitable for use in an equestrian jacket, then these pieces may be assembled into a specially constructed jig to hold them into place before application of the fabric substrate 14. As described above, the sheet of resilient foam from which the elements are cut will have hot-melt adhesive applied to one or both surfaces prior to the cutting process.

In a further variation, the sheet of resilient material is cut into strips in a first direction using a plurality of rolling cutters. The sheet is cut in a second direction perpendicular to the first to form cubes. The cutters are then moved sideways to cut narrow strips of foam in both directions to space the cubes apart, the narrow strips of foam being stripped away to leave the cubes.

FIG. 7 shows another embodiment of flexible material similar to that shown in FIG. 1, but with a layer of fabric 16 bonded to each of opposite sides of tho elements 17. This embodiment may be produced in a similar way to that shown in FIG. 1 except that opposite sides of the foam layer are coated with adhesive and, after the foam cubes bonded to a first layer of fabric have been removed from the cutter, a second layer of fabric is placed over the exposed surface of the elements and pressed with a heated platen to effect a bond.

In other variations to the above methods, the hot-melt adhesive may be applied to the surface the substrate rather or in addition to the sides of the flexible material. Alternatively or in addition, a hot-melt film can be interposed between the elements and the substrate.

Also, heated nip-rollers can be used in place of a heated platen to bond the elements to the substrate, particularly when substrate is bonded to both sides of the elements, which are thereby sandwiched therebetween. This facilitates passage of the material between the rollers prior to activation of the adhesive.

Flexible materials according to the invention are more convenient to produce and more flexible and versatile that known protective materials. They may also be used in a variety of applications including protective wear and clothing.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US2751609Sep 10, 1953Jun 26, 1956Oesterling James FredInsulating ground pad
US2785739Aug 11, 1955Mar 19, 1957Mobay Chemical CorpPolyurethane cushions
US3020186May 21, 1959Feb 6, 1962Lawrence LeonardLaminating method and means for manufacturing synthetic resinous foam pads
US3137746Jul 18, 1961Jun 16, 1964Smith & Nephew ResMethod of producing non-woven fabrics from thermoplastic film
US3285768Jul 18, 1962Nov 15, 1966Deering Milliken Res CorpFabric coated with surface deformed foam
US3285800Feb 25, 1963Nov 15, 1966Armstrong Cork CoCushioning and wrapping laminate
US3293671Jun 14, 1965Dec 27, 1966Victor R GriffinCushions, and the like
US3305423Nov 20, 1963Feb 21, 1967Michel PielMethod of making an isothermal garment
US3404406Sep 13, 1966Oct 8, 1968Rubatex CorpDiving suit
US3441638Nov 19, 1965Apr 29, 1969Smith & NephewProcess for making an open network structure
US3465364May 9, 1967Sep 9, 1969Gen Sportcraft Co LtdProtective pad
US3471865Jul 24, 1968Oct 14, 1969American Safety EquipSafety helmet ear pads
US3512190Jul 24, 1967May 19, 1970Tenneco ChemCushion construction
US3679263Jun 29, 1970Jul 25, 1972Citroen SaSeat comprising independently mounted blocks of deformable elastic padding
US3746605Aug 9, 1971Jul 17, 1973Eastman Kodak CoCushioning material
US3775526Jan 12, 1972Nov 27, 1973Sw Ind IncMethod of modifying the characteristics of flexible cellular material
US3867238Mar 6, 1973Feb 18, 1975Chemacryl Plastics LtdFlexile core material for laminated structures and method of producing the same
US3911185Sep 26, 1974Oct 7, 1975Du PontHigh ring and ball softening point hot melt backsize adhesive composition
US3914487Oct 18, 1973Oct 21, 1975Azoulay ClaudeFabric with discrete spaced projections of synthetic plastic material
US3922329Jan 16, 1973Nov 25, 1975Hercules IncMethods of making network structures
US4023213May 17, 1976May 17, 1977Pepsico, Inc.Shock-absorbing system for protective equipment
US4126177Mar 10, 1977Nov 21, 1978Chemetron CorporationDual scraped surface heat exchanger
US4136222Apr 18, 1977Jan 23, 1979Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing CompanyThin lightweight drapeable sheet covered with vapor-deposited specularly reflective layer and separator layer of open array of polymeric foam segments
US4138283Sep 1, 1976Feb 6, 1979Textron Inc.Process for producing fabric-backed cushioning material
US4197342Oct 25, 1977Apr 8, 1980Uniroyal, Inc.Trim pads for vehicle seats
US4272850May 25, 1979Jun 16, 1981W. H. Brine CompanyBody protective pads
US4276341Oct 22, 1979Jun 30, 1981Kabushiki Kaisha Asahi GomuLaminated synthetic rubber sponge sheet, stretch fabric, and polyurethane film
US4415622Nov 2, 1982Nov 15, 1983Kayser-Roth CorporationPolyethylene adhesive
US4482592Sep 2, 1983Nov 13, 1984The B. F. Goodrich CompanyVibration isolation pad
US4485919Apr 9, 1984Dec 4, 1984Dan SandelSterilizable foam support tray for medical instruments
US4507801Sep 7, 1982Apr 2, 1985Doc-K Protective Equipment, Inc.For protecting the upper part of an athlete
US4512037Aug 17, 1982Apr 23, 1985Sports Marketing, Inc.Protective pad assembly
US4534354Sep 29, 1982Aug 13, 1985Universal Medical Products, Inc.Bandage
US4538301Dec 30, 1982Sep 3, 1985Dierk FilmerProtective device
US4581186Jul 30, 1984Apr 8, 1986Larson Roger EMethod of making foam core building panels in a continuous operation
US4631221Apr 3, 1985Dec 23, 1986Hoechst AktiengesellschaftRigid outer layers covering lightweight fiber material core impregnated with resin
US4646367Jul 9, 1985Mar 3, 1987Hassen Moulaye Ould ElTumbling cap
US4692199Dec 13, 1985Sep 8, 1987Lear Siegler, Inc.Method and apparatus for bonding fabric to a foam pad
US4713854Mar 29, 1985Dec 22, 1987Graebe Robert HConstant force cushion
US4718214Sep 12, 1986Jan 12, 1988Alumax, Inc.Reinforced siding panel
US4730761Aug 15, 1986Mar 15, 1988Personal Products CompanyCutting flexible formed products from foam retaining sheet
US4734306Mar 30, 1987Mar 29, 1988Burlington Industries, Inc.Open-celled foam
US4756026May 4, 1987Jul 12, 1988Pierce Jr Alfred RFor protection during a contact sport
US4809374Jan 7, 1987Mar 7, 1989Joseph SaviezPadding body constituted of individual modular elements, and its application to the production of seats and of removable cushions or back-rests
US4856393Jun 10, 1987Aug 15, 1989Braddon George BMethod for die cutting plastic foam
US4859274May 3, 1988Aug 22, 1989Marvel Fred DPacket-type laminator
US4867826Aug 28, 1987Sep 19, 1989Actex, Inc.Applying adhesive to foam, covering with fabric, compressing regions with heated projections, solidifying melted, collapsed areas to form embossed lines
US4991230Aug 25, 1989Feb 12, 1991Vacanti Eugene JContact sports
US5052053Jan 9, 1990Oct 1, 1991O'neill, Inc.Garment for aquatic activities having increased elasticity and method of making same
US5129295Aug 21, 1991Jul 14, 1992Ontario Die Company LimitedMethod of cutting compressible materials
US5160785Jul 9, 1991Nov 3, 1992E. R. Carpenter Company, Inc.Padding body
US5168576Oct 3, 1990Dec 8, 1992Krent Edward DBody protective device
US5188879Jul 15, 1991Feb 23, 1993Sorrento Engineering CorporationPolyimide foam filled structures
US5232762Feb 5, 1990Aug 3, 1993Ruby Victor LProduct of a two phase, self configuring coreless structural element for furniture and the like
US5353455May 12, 1993Oct 11, 1994Carpenter Co.Padding body with individual modular elements
US5360653Dec 21, 1992Nov 1, 1994Ackley Robert EEncapsulated foam pad
US5405665Jun 26, 1992Apr 11, 1995Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd.Multi-layered foam heat-shrinkable tube
US5452477Mar 7, 1994Sep 26, 1995Mann; Ho-KeungItem of swimming wear
US5534208Jun 7, 1995Jul 9, 1996Foamex L.P.Three dimensional surface shaping of synthetic foam pads by continuous rotary process
US5551082Feb 24, 1995Sep 3, 1996Crash Pads, Inc.Protective athletic pants having diagonal protect pads around hip, buttocks and thigh areas
US5594954Mar 11, 1996Jan 21, 1997Huang; Cheng-YenKnee-pad and elbow-pad
US5689836Feb 26, 1997Nov 25, 1997Mcdavid Knee Guard, Inc.Athletic protective undergarment
US5727252Oct 31, 1996Mar 17, 1998Rollerblade, Inc.Padded knee guard
US5780147Mar 13, 1996Jul 14, 1998Daiso Co., Ltd.Laminate having improved dimensional stability and heat resistance
US5823981Jun 6, 1994Oct 20, 1998Royce Medical CompanyNeoprene
US6054005Apr 30, 1999Apr 25, 2000Sentinel Products Corp.Polymer structures with enhanced properties
US6070267Nov 12, 1999Jun 6, 2000Mckewin; Kevin J.Knee pad holder
US6070273Mar 27, 1998Jun 6, 2000Sgro; JosephBody pads particulary for sports
US6085353Feb 17, 1999Jul 11, 2000Vanson Leathers, Inc.Ventilated garments
US6093468Mar 14, 1997Jul 25, 2000The Procter & Gamble CompanyFlexible lightweight protective pad with energy absorbing inserts
US6167790Oct 6, 1998Jan 2, 2001Sentinel Products Corp.Laminated foam structures with enhanced properties
US6235661Jun 23, 1997May 22, 2001Extrasport, Inc.Fabric laminated flotation foam material for manufacturing life jackets and similar articles and articles manufactured using such materials
US6253376May 31, 2000Jul 3, 2001Frank L. RitterKnee pad
US6295654Mar 15, 2000Oct 2, 2001Daniel P. FarrellProtective sports garment
US6301722Sep 1, 1999Oct 16, 2001Brock Usa, LlcPads and padding for sports gear and accessories
US6317888Jul 12, 2000Nov 20, 2001Knee-On Australia Pty Ltd.Kneepad
US6374409May 31, 2000Apr 23, 2002Salomon S.A.Accessory providing protection against falls in sports such as in-line skating
US6485448Jan 25, 2001Nov 26, 2002Beiersdorf Inc.Knee strap
US6584616Jul 10, 2001Jul 1, 2003Travel Caddy, Inc.Knee pad construction
US6654962Jul 3, 2002Dec 2, 2003Demott-Steinhaus GroupProtective knee pad system
US6743325Jul 13, 2000Jun 1, 2004Stirling Moulded Composites LimitedFlexible material
US6820279Dec 17, 2002Nov 23, 2004Thomas Jeffry LesoskyKneepad
US6841022Oct 1, 2002Jan 11, 2005Hitachi Chemical Company, Ltd.Adhesive-coated electronic parts on a connection sheet
US6851124Dec 21, 2001Feb 8, 2005Jose MunozKnee pad and method of manufacture
US6968573Aug 30, 2002Nov 29, 2005James SilverConvertible ventilated trousers
US6969548Aug 25, 2000Nov 29, 2005Goldfine Andrew AImpact absorbing composite
US7007356Sep 22, 2003Mar 7, 2006Phoenix Performance Products, Inc.Cushioning pads and the formation of cushioning pads
US20080113143Oct 29, 2007May 15, 2008David Stirling TaylorFlexible Material and Method of Manufacturing the Flexible Material
US20100272969Oct 9, 2007Oct 28, 2010Stirling Moulded Composites LimitedFlexible, impact-resistant laminate and a method of manufacturing same
US20100285299Oct 9, 2007Nov 11, 2010Stirling Moulded Composites LimitedMethod of manufacturing a flexible, impact- resistant laminate
USRE41346 *Jul 13, 2000May 25, 2010Stirling Mouldings LimitedFlexible material
USRE42689 *Jul 13, 2000Sep 13, 2011Stirling Mouldings LimitedFlexible material
DE3641609C1Dec 5, 1986Feb 18, 1988Uhl Sportartikel KarlProcess for producing a laminated adhesive-foam material, in particular basic material for goalkeeper's gloves
DE4341722A1Dec 3, 1993Jun 30, 1994Martin FritzePressure cushion material
DE9102039U1Feb 21, 1991May 8, 1991Hein Gericke Gmbh & Co Kg, 4000 Duesseldorf, DeTitle not available
DE19640263A1Sep 30, 1996Apr 2, 1998Alveo AgShaped padding body
DE202006013732U1Sep 7, 2006Feb 15, 2007Herrmann, KatrinCervical spine and back protector for use during practice of e.g. snowboarding, is composed of individual segment sections that are connected with one another, where supporting surface is formed by segments that approach each other
EP1369149A1May 5, 2003Dec 10, 2003Euroin di Paludetto RenatoProtection device
FR2581348A1 Title not available
FR2635650A1 Title not available
GB800474A Title not available
Non-Patent Citations
Reference
1"ESC Steel Rule Dies," available at http://escutters.co.uk/#/laser-flat-bed/4525904364 (last visited Mar. 30, 2010), 1 page. cited by other.
2"Hot Melt Adhesives Technology Review," Pacific Northwest Pollution Prevention Resource Center (Sep. 1988), available at http://pprc.org/pubs/techreviews/hotmelt.hmintro.html (last visited Mar. 30, 2010), 2 psges. cited by other.
3"Protecting Your Assets," World Sports Activewear, vol. 2, Issue 3 (Autumn 1996), pp. 24-28. cited by other.
4Bender, Rene J., "Handbook of Foamed Plastics" (1965), pp. 285-293. cited by other.
5Corrected Plaintiffs' Statement of Material Facts Pursuant to Local Rule 56.1 in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment of No Invalidity of U.S. Patent No. RE42,689 Under 35 USC 112 dated Apr. 19, 2012-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 486).
6Corrected Plaintiffs' Statement of Material Facts Pursuant to Local Rule 56.1 in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment of No Invalidity of U.S. Patent No. RE42,689 Under 35 USC 112 dated Apr. 19, 2012—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 486).
7Corrected Version of Exhibit 2, Part 1 to the Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction, filed Jun. 5, 2009 (Doc. No. 62). cited by other.
8Declaration of Alyson G. Barker in Support of Defendant Nike USA Inc 's Responsive Claim Construction Brief re Reissue Patent dated Nov. 19, 2010-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. V. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 311).
9Declaration of Alyson G. Barker in Support of Defendant Nike USA Inc 's Responsive Claim Construction Brief re Reissue Patent dated Nov. 19, 2010—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. V. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 311).
10Declaration of Alyson G. Barker in support of Nike USA's Responsive Claim Construction, filed Jul. 13, 2009, and Exhibit A thereto (Doc. No. 96). cited by other.
11Declaration of Brookstein regarding Nike's Response to Plaintiff's Statements of Fact dated Feb. 3, 2012-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc No. 429).
12Declaration of Brookstein regarding Nike's Response to Plaintiff's Statements of Fact dated Feb. 3, 2012—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc No. 429).
13Declaration of Glenn L. Beall regarding Motion for Summary Judgment in Support of Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment of No Invalidity of US Patent No. RE42,689 Under 35 Usc 112 dated Apr. 19, 2012-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 480).
14Declaration of Glenn L. Beall regarding Motion for Summary Judgment in Support of Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment of No Invalidity of US Patent No. RE42,689 Under 35 Usc 112 dated Apr. 19, 2012—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 480).
15Declaration of Henkelmann regarding Motion for Summary Judgment in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment of No Invalidity of US Patent No. RE42,689 Under 35 USC 112 dated Apr. 19, 2012-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 481).
16Declaration of Henkelmann regarding Motion for Summary Judgment in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment of No Invalidity of US Patent No. RE42,689 Under 35 USC 112 dated Apr. 19, 2012—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 481).
17Declaration of Jaren E. Hedman regarding Motion for Summary Judgment of No Invalidity of US Patent No. RE42,689 Under 35 USC 251 dated Apr. 19, 2012-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 474).
18Declaration of Jaren E. Hedman regarding Motion for Summary Judgment of No Invalidity of US Patent No. RE42,689 Under 35 USC 251 dated Apr. 19, 2012—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 474).
19Declaration of Schletzbaum regarding Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity dated Apr. 19, 2012 dated Apr. 19, 2012-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 460).
20Declaration of Schletzbaum regarding Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity dated Apr. 19, 2012 dated Apr. 19, 2012—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 460).
21Declaration of Schletzbaum regarding Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement dated Apr. 19, 2012-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 467).
22Declaration of Schletzbaum regarding Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement dated Apr. 19, 2012—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 467).
23Declaration of Schletzbaum regarding Nike's Response to Plaintiff's Statements of Fact dated Feb. 3, 2012-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 417).
24Declaration of Schletzbaum regarding Nike's Response to Plaintiff's Statements of Fact dated Feb. 3, 2012—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 417).
25Declaration of Turner regarding Nike's Response to Plaintiffs Statements of Fact dated Feb. 3, 2012-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 416).
26Declaration of Turner regarding Nike's Response to Plaintiffs Statements of Fact dated Feb. 3, 2012—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 416).
27Defendant Nike USA Inc.'s Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider Order Granting Nike's Motion for Summary Judgment dated Sep. 23, 2011-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584. (Doc. No. 358).
28Defendant Nike USA Inc.'s Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider Order Granting Nike's Motion for Summary Judgment dated Sep. 23, 2011—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584. (Doc. No. 358).
29Defendant Nike USA Inc.'s Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider Order Granting Nike's Motion for Summary Judgment: dated Sep. 23, 2011-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584. (Doc. No. 358).
30Defendant Nike USA Inc.'s Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider Order Granting Nike's Motion for Summary Judgment: dated Sep. 23, 2011—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584. (Doc. No. 358).
31Defendant-Appellee Appeal Brief in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2010-1171 (from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois) dated May 11, 2010-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584.
32Defendant-Appellee Appeal Brief in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2010-1171 (from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois) dated May 11, 2010—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584.
33Defendants Memorandum Regarding Prosecution History of U.S. Patent RE42,689 dated Dec. 12, 2011-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc, Civil No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 390).
34Defendants Memorandum Regarding Prosecution History of U.S. Patent RE42,689 dated Dec. 12, 2011—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc, Civil No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 390).
35Defendant's Response to Motion for Summary Judgment of Infringement of U.S. Reissue Patent RE42,689 Pursuant to Local Rule 56.1 dated Feb. 3, 2012-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 409).
36Defendant's Response to Motion for Summary Judgment of Infringement of U.S. Reissue Patent RE42,689 Pursuant to Local Rule 56.1 dated Feb. 3, 2012—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 409).
37Hoffman, Edward G., "Jig and Fixture Design" (1980), pp. 205-219. cited by other.
38Jeff Hopkins, "Advances, Advantages, and Techniques of Hot Melt Adhesives", Journal of Industrial Textiles, (1993), pp. 5-13. cited by other.
39John Halbmaier, "Overview of Hot Melt Adhesives Application Equipment for Coating and Laminating Full-Width Fabrics", Journal of Industrial Textiles, (1992), pp. 301-310. cited by other.
40Joint Claim Construction Chart and Status Report, filed Sep. 1, 2009 (Doc. No. 135). cited by other.
41Lascoe, O.D., "Handbook of Fabrication Processes" (1988), p. 215. cited by other.
42Mandate of USCA Federal Circuit dated Dec. 9, 2010 regarding Notice of Appeal related to denial of motion for preliminary injunction on Dec. 15, 2010-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 325).
43Mandate of USCA Federal Circuit dated Dec. 9, 2010 regarding Notice of Appeal related to denial of motion for preliminary injunction on Dec. 15, 2010—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 325).
44McDavid's Memorandum in Support of Motion for Miscellaneous Relief for Claim Construction of US Patent No. RE42,689 dated Apr. 19, 2012-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 484).
45McDavid's Memorandum in Support of Motion for Miscellaneous Relief for Claim Construction of US Patent No. RE42,689 dated Apr. 19, 2012—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 484).
46McDavid's Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment of No Invalidity of US Patent No. RE42,689 dated Apr. 19, 2012-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 471).
47McDavid's Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment of No Invalidity of US Patent No. RE42,689 dated Apr. 19, 2012—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 471).
48McDavid's Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment of No Invalidity of US Patent No. RE42,689 Under 35 USC 112 dated Apr. 19, 2012-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 478).
49McDavid's Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment of No Invalidity of US Patent No. RE42,689 Under 35 USC 112 dated Apr. 19, 2012—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 478).
50McDavid's Motion for Claim Construction of US Patent No. RE42,689 dated Apr. 19, 2012-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 483).
51McDavid's Motion for Claim Construction of US Patent No. RE42,689 dated Apr. 19, 2012—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 483).
52McDavid's Motion for Summary Judgment of No Invalidity of US Patent No. RE42,689 Under 35 Usc 112 dated Apr. 19, 2012-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 477).
53McDavid's Motion for Summary Judgment of No Invalidity of US Patent No. RE42,689 Under 35 Usc 112 dated Apr. 19, 2012—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 477).
54McDavid's Motion for Summary Judgment of no. Invalidity of US Patent No. RE42,689 dated Apr. 19, 2012-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 470).
55McDavid's Motion for Summary Judgment of no. Invalidity of US Patent No. RE42,689 dated Apr. 19, 2012—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 470).
56McDavid's Reply to Defendant's Supplemental Invalidity Contentions regarding U.S. Reissue Patent 42,689 dated Apr. 5, 2012-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584.
57McDavid's Reply to Defendant's Supplemental Invalidity Contentions regarding U.S. Reissue Patent 42,689 dated Apr. 5, 2012—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584.
58McDavid's Rule 56(a) Statement regarding Motion for Summary Judgment of No Invalidity US Patent No. RE42,689 dated Apr. 19, 2012-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 472).
59McDavid's Rule 56(a) Statement regarding Motion for Summary Judgment of No Invalidity US Patent No. RE42,689 dated Apr. 19, 2012—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 472).
60McDavid's Statement of Material Facts Pursuant to Local Rule 56.1 in Support of Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment of No Invalidity of US Patent No. RE42,689 Under 35 USC 112 dated Apr. 19, 2012-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 479).
61McDavid's Statement of Material Facts Pursuant to Local Rule 56.1 in Support of Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment of No Invalidity of US Patent No. RE42,689 Under 35 USC 112 dated Apr. 19, 2012—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 479).
62Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction, filed May 28, 2009, and Exhibits 1-10 thereto (Public (Redacted) Version) (Doc. No. 54). cited by other.
63Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment of Infringement of U.S. Reissue Patent RE42,689 dated Nov. 9, 2011-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584. (Doc. No. 371).
64Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment of Infringement of U.S. Reissue Patent RE42,689 dated Nov. 9, 2011—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584. (Doc. No. 371).
65Memorandum Opinion and Order Construing Disputed Claim Terms, entered Sep. 17, 2009, Honorable James F. Holderman (Doc. No. 137). cited by other.
66Memorandum Opinion And Order dated Mar. 5, 2012-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 450), 11 pages.
67Memorandum Opinion And Order dated Mar. 5, 2012—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 450), 11 pages.
68Memorandum Opinion and Order denying motion for preliminary injunction signed by the Honorable James F. Holderman on Jan. 14, 2010-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No 171).
69Memorandum Opinion and Order denying motion for preliminary injunction signed by the Honorable James F. Holderman on Jan. 14, 2010—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No 171).
70Memorandum Opinion And Order, case No. 1:08-cv-06584, filed Aug. 17, 2011, 32 pages (Doc. No. 345).
71Minute Entry before Honorable James F. Holderman on Mar. 1, 2012 authorizing supplementation of invalidity contentions-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 446).
72Minute Entry before Honorable James F. Holderman on Mar. 1, 2012 authorizing supplementation of invalidity contentions—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 446).
73Minute Entry before Honorable James F. Holderman on Mar. 5, 2012 denying Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 449).
74Minute Entry before Honorable James F. Holderman on Mar. 5, 2012 denying Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 449).
75Minute Order dated Nov. 15, 2011 regarding Nike's Motion for Partial Dismissal of Plaintiffs' Third Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 363)-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584. (Doc. No. 380).
76Minute Order dated Nov. 15, 2011 regarding Nike's Motion for Partial Dismissal of Plaintiffs' Third Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 363)—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584. (Doc. No. 380).
77Motion by Nike USA, Inc. to amend/correct Non-Infringement and Invalidity Contentions Pursuant to Local Patent Rule 3.4 dated Feb. 24, 2012-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 437).
78Motion by Nike USA, Inc. to amend/correct Non-Infringement and Invalidity Contentions Pursuant to Local Patent Rule 3.4 dated Feb. 24, 2012—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 437).
79Nike USA Inc.'s Reply Brief in Support of Motion for Partial Dismissal of Plaintiffs' Third Amended Complaint dated Nov. 10, 2011-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584. (Doc. No. 379).
80Nike USA Inc.'s Reply Brief in Support of Motion for Partial Dismissal of Plaintiffs' Third Amended Complaint dated Nov. 10, 2011—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584. (Doc. No. 379).
81Nike USA, Inc.'s Motion for Partial Dismissal of Plaintiffs' Third Amended Complaint dated Oct. 7, 2011-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584. (Doc. No. 363).
82Nike USA, Inc.'s Motion for Partial Dismissal of Plaintiffs' Third Amended Complaint dated Oct. 7, 2011—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584. (Doc. No. 363).
83Nike's Invalidity Contention Charts 1-21 (non-confidential attachments to confidential Supplemental Invalidity Contentions)-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584.
84Nike's Invalidity Contention Charts 1-21 (non-confidential attachments to confidential Supplemental Invalidity Contentions)—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584.
85Nike's Memorandum and Points of Authorities in Support of Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment of NonInfringement dated Apr. 19, 2012-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 465).
86Nike's Memorandum and Points of Authorities in Support of Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment of NonInfringement dated Apr. 19, 2012—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 465).
87Nike's Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity dated Apr. 19, 2012-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 458).
88Nike's Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity dated Apr. 19, 2012—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 458).
89Nike's Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity dated Apr. 19, 2012-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 454).
90Nike's Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity dated Apr. 19, 2012—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 454).
91Nike's Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement dated Apr. 19, 2012-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 462).
92Nike's Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement dated Apr. 19, 2012—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 462).
93Nike's Motion to Strike Plaintiffs' Reply to Nike's Non-Infringement Contentions dated Apr. 19, 2012-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 473).
94Nike's Motion to Strike Plaintiffs' Reply to Nike's Non-Infringement Contentions dated Apr. 19, 2012—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 473).
95Nike's Response to Plaintiff's Statements of Fact dated Feb. 3, 2012-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 415).
96Nike's Response to Plaintiff's Statements of Fact dated Feb. 3, 2012—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 415).
97Nike's Statement of Undisputed Material Facts Pursuant to Local Rule 56.1 in Support of Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement dated Apr. 19, 2012-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 466).
98Nike's Statement of Undisputed Material Facts Pursuant to Local Rule 56.1 in Support of Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement dated Apr. 19, 2012—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 466).
99Nike's Statements of Undisputed Material Facts Pursuant to Local Rule 56.1 in Support of Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity dated Apr. 19, 2012-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 459).
100Nike's Statements of Undisputed Material Facts Pursuant to Local Rule 56.1 in Support of Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity dated Apr. 19, 2012—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 459).
101Opinion dated Oct. 19, 2011 regarding Motion For Reconsideration of Order Granting Nikes Motion for Summary judgment of Non-infringement of claim 1 of the '346 Patent Under the Doctrine of Equivalents-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584. (Doc. No. 366).
102Opinion dated Oct. 19, 2011 regarding Motion For Reconsideration of Order Granting Nikes Motion for Summary judgment of Non-infringement of claim 1 of the '346 Patent Under the Doctrine of Equivalents—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584. (Doc. No. 366).
103Petrie, Edward M., "Handbook of Adhesives and Sealants" (2000), p. 308. cited by other.
104Plaintiff-Appellant Appeal Brief in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2010-1171 (from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois) dated Mar. 29, 2010-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584.
105Plaintiff-Appellant Appeal Brief in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2010-1171 (from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois) dated Mar. 29, 2010—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584.
106Plaintiffs' Brief Regarding the Patent Office's Consideration of the Court's Claim Construction in the Prosecution History of U.S. Reissue Patent RE42,689 dated Dec. 12, 2011-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 389).
107Plaintiffs' Brief Regarding the Patent Office's Consideration of the Court's Claim Construction in the Prosecution History of U.S. Reissue Patent RE42,689 dated Dec. 12, 2011—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 389).
108Plaintiffs' Claim Construction Memorandum, filed Jun. 15, 2009, and Exhibits 1-6 thereto (Doc. No. 67). cited by other.
109Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration of Order Granting Nike's Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of Claim 1 of the '346 Patent Under The Doctrine of Equivalents dated Sep. 19, 2011-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584. (Doc. No. 356).
110Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration of Order Granting Nike's Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of Claim 1 of the '346 Patent Under The Doctrine of Equivalents dated Sep. 19, 2011—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584. (Doc. No. 356).
111Plaintiffs' Opening Claim Construction Memorandum dated Nov. 5, 2010-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 307).
112Plaintiffs' Opening Claim Construction Memorandum dated Nov. 5, 2010—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 307).
113Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant Nike's Motion for Partial Dismissal of Plaintiffs' Third Amended Complaint dated Oct. 27, 2011-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584. (Doc. No. 367).
114Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant Nike's Motion for Partial Dismissal of Plaintiffs' Third Amended Complaint dated Oct. 27, 2011—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584. (Doc. No. 367).
115Plaintiffs' Rebuttal Memorandum on Claim Construction, filed Jul. 13, 2009, and Exhibits 1-5 thereto (Doc. No. 97). cited by other.
116Plaintiffs' Reply Brief in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration of Order Granting Nike's Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of Claim 1 of the '346 Patent Under the Doctrine of Equivalents dated Sep. 30, 2011-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584. (Doc. No. 361).
117Plaintiffs' Reply Brief in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration of Order Granting Nike's Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of Claim 1 of the '346 Patent Under the Doctrine of Equivalents dated Sep. 30, 2011—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584. (Doc. No. 361).
118Plaintiff's Reply Brief in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2010-1171 (from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois) dated May 28, 2010-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584.
119Plaintiff's Reply Brief in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2010-1171 (from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois) dated May 28, 2010—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584.
120Plaintiffs' Reply to Defendant Nike USA, Inc.'s Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment of Infringement dated Dec. 10, 2010-McDavid Knee Guard. Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 323).
121Plaintiffs' Reply to Defendant Nike USA, Inc.'s Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment of Infringement dated Dec. 10, 2010—McDavid Knee Guard. Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 323).
122Plaintiffs' Response to Defendant Nike's Opening Claim Construction Brief dated Nov. 19, 2010-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 318).
123Plaintiffs' Response to Defendant Nike's Opening Claim Construction Brief dated Nov. 19, 2010—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 318).
124Plaintiffs' Response to Nike's Memorandum Regarding the Prosecution History of U.S.Reissue Patent RE42,689 dated Dec. 19, 2011-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-DV-6584 (Doc. No. 392).
125Plaintiffs' Response to Nike's Memorandum Regarding the Prosecution History of U.S.Reissue Patent RE42,689 dated Dec. 19, 2011—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-DV-6584 (Doc. No. 392).
126Plaintiffs' Statement of Material Facts Pursuant to Local Rule 56.1 in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment of Infringement of U.S. Patent Reissue Patent RE42,689 dated Nov. 9, 2011-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584. (Doc. No. 375).
127Plaintiffs' Statement of Material Facts Pursuant to Local Rule 56.1 in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment of Infringement of U.S. Patent Reissue Patent RE42,689 dated Nov. 9, 2011—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584. (Doc. No. 375).
128Reply by McDavid Knee Guard, Inc., Stirling Mouldings Limited to response in opposition to motion Reply in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment of Infringement of U.S. Reissue Patent RE42,689 dated Feb. 29, 2012-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 440).
129Reply by McDavid Knee Guard, Inc., Stirling Mouldings Limited to response in opposition to motion Reply in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment of Infringement of U.S. Reissue Patent RE42,689 dated Feb. 29, 2012—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 440).
130Reply by Nike USA, Inc. In Support of its Motion to Amend Non-Infringement and Invalidity Contentions dated Feb. 29, 2012-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 444).
131Reply by Nike USA, Inc. In Support of its Motion to Amend Non-Infringement and Invalidity Contentions dated Feb. 29, 2012—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 444).
132Reply by Plaintiffs McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. Stirling Mouldings Limited to Nike's Responsive Claim Construction Brief dated Dec. 10, 2010-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 324).
133Reply by Plaintiffs McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. Stirling Mouldings Limited to Nike's Responsive Claim Construction Brief dated Dec. 10, 2010—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 324).
134Response by Defendant Nike USA, Inc. regarding Plaintiffs' Brief Regarding the Patent Office's Consideration of the Court's Claim Construction in the Prosecution History of U.S. Reissue Patent RE42,689 dated Dec. 19, 2011-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 391).
135Response by Defendant Nike USA, Inc. regarding Plaintiffs' Brief Regarding the Patent Office's Consideration of the Court's Claim Construction in the Prosecution History of U.S. Reissue Patent RE42,689 dated Dec. 19, 2011—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 391).
136Response by McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. in Opposition to Motion by Nike USA, Inc. to amend/correct Non-Infringement and Invalidity Contentions Pursuant to Local Patent Rule 3A dated Feb. 29, 2012-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 439).
137Response by McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. in Opposition to Motion by Nike USA, Inc. to amend/correct Non-Infringement and Invalidity Contentions Pursuant to Local Patent Rule 3A dated Feb. 29, 2012—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 439).
138Response to Defendants Additional Statement of Facts by McDavid Knee Guard, Inc., Stirling Mouldings Limited dated Feb. 29, 2012-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 443).
139Response to Defendants Additional Statement of Facts by McDavid Knee Guard, Inc., Stirling Mouldings Limited dated Feb. 29, 2012—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 443).
140Responsive Claim Construction Brief of Defendant Nike USA, Inc., filed Jul. 13, 2009 (Redacted) (Doc. No. 95). cited by other.
141Roff, W.J., et al., "Handbook of Common Polymers-Fibres, Films, Plastics and Rubbers" (1971), p. 456. cited by other.
142Roff, W.J., et al., "Handbook of Common Polymers—Fibres, Films, Plastics and Rubbers" (1971), p. 456. cited by other.
143SAE Specification AMS 3698A, (Jul. 1, 1987), 13 pages. cited by other.
144SAE Specification AMS 3698B, (Jan. 1, 1993), 1 page. cited by other.
145Sarna Xiro GmbH, EC Safety Data Sheet, Jan. 16, 2001, 5 pages. cited by other.
146Third Amended Complaint dated Sep. 16, 2011-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584. (Doc. No. 355).
147Third Amended Complaint dated Sep. 16, 2011—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584. (Doc. No. 355).
148Transcript of Proceedings held on Dec. 20, 2011-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 393).
149Transcript of Proceedings held on Dec. 20, 2011—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 393).
150Transcript of Proceedings held on Nov. 15, 2011-McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 388).
151Transcript of Proceedings held on Nov. 15, 2011—McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 388).
152Walker, John R., "Machining Fundamentals-From Basic to Applied Techniques" (1993), pp. 502-503. cited by other.
153Walker, John R., "Machining Fundamentals—From Basic to Applied Techniques" (1993), pp. 502-503. cited by other.
154Walter Fung, "Coated And Laminated Textiles", (2002), pp. 114-133. cited by other.
155Watson, Chris, "Hot Melt Coating Methods: The More They Change the More They Stay the Same," 1996 Hot Melt Symposium TAPPI Proceedings (1996),pp. 1-5. cited by other.
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US20120102816 *Nov 1, 2010May 3, 2012Rudolph NewmanApparatus and method for baiting a fishhook
Classifications
U.S. Classification156/265, 156/308.2, 156/300, 156/271, 156/299, 2/456, 156/560, 2/16, 428/304.4, 156/301, 428/141, 156/259, 156/512, 2/22
International ClassificationB32B38/04