WO1994029689A1 - Structural monitoring system - Google Patents
Structural monitoring system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO1994029689A1 WO1994029689A1 PCT/US1994/005766 US9405766W WO9429689A1 WO 1994029689 A1 WO1994029689 A1 WO 1994029689A1 US 9405766 W US9405766 W US 9405766W WO 9429689 A1 WO9429689 A1 WO 9429689A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- sensor
- frequency
- structural
- output
- amplitude
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01M—TESTING STATIC OR DYNAMIC BALANCE OF MACHINES OR STRUCTURES; TESTING OF STRUCTURES OR APPARATUS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G01M5/00—Investigating the elasticity of structures, e.g. deflection of bridges or air-craft wings
- G01M5/0033—Investigating the elasticity of structures, e.g. deflection of bridges or air-craft wings by determining damage, crack or wear
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01M—TESTING STATIC OR DYNAMIC BALANCE OF MACHINES OR STRUCTURES; TESTING OF STRUCTURES OR APPARATUS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G01M5/00—Investigating the elasticity of structures, e.g. deflection of bridges or air-craft wings
- G01M5/0066—Investigating the elasticity of structures, e.g. deflection of bridges or air-craft wings by exciting or detecting vibration or acceleration
Definitions
- This invention relates to monitoring and determination of the structural integrity of bridges, buildings, transmission towers and the like. Specifically, sensors are attached to the structure to measure various parameters of structural movement from which a baseline reading is determined which may then be compared with later readings from the same structure in order to determine changes in the natural frequency of the structure and decay of structural integrity.
- Another object of the present invention is to allow comparisons to be made over the lifetime of a structure with baseline data on the particular structure in order to determine when sufficient structural degradation has occurred to require replacement;
- Another object of the present invention is to provide a means of identifying which bridges and other structures may receive an extended useful life and to distinguish those structures from structures subject to overloading and a reduced structural lifetime;
- Yet another object of the present invention is to provide a means of forecasting the need to replace bridges and other structures through accumulation and comparison of structural stress and loading data on individual structures.
- An apparatus and method are provided which enable the long-term analysis and evaluation of the structural integrity of transmission towers, buildings, bridges, freeway overpasses and the like in order to evaluate their useful life and present safety status.
- the method of analysis is accomplished through the use of an apparatus comprising strain gauge sensors applied to the structure at predetermined locations for measurement of structure maximum strain and maximum dynamic amplitude.
- Data gathered by the sensors is then transmitted to a data recorder for storage of the collected data or to a computer for data analysis and comparison.
- the received data may then be transmitted to a central facility for comparison of data with baseline data on the particular structure and for analysis of structural
- Fig. 1 is a schematic representation of the monitor system showing the sensors attached to the amplification, data recording, transmitting, and power equipment;
- Fig. 2 shows a typical resistance wire strain gauge or sensor which is attached to the structure to be monitored
- Fig. 3 is a flow chart of the method steps of the monitoring procedure.
- Fig. 1 the equipment modules of structural monitoring system 10 are shown in schematic representation.
- Sensor 12 is attached to critical areas of the structure to detect strain on the structure at points of significant amplitude. Selection of the points of attachment for sensor 12 is described
- Sensor 12 is, in a preferred embodiment, an electrical resistance wire strain gauge 40 (Fig. 2).
- Strain gauge 40 is comprised of a foil resistance wire element 42 attached to an adhesive backing 44.
- Connector terminals 46 are at either end of resistance wire 42 and serve to connect the strain gauge to detector/amplifier 14.
- Strain gauge 40 is attached to the structure at selected points in order to detect the maximum strain endured by the structure during various types of loading. For example, in the case of a bridge it is of interest to collect data on the point of critical strain generated by deflection of the road bed as traffic passes across it. In this manner, the impact of traffic on the structural integrity of the bridge roadway can be monitored. Alternatively, where wind induced swaying is a significant
- sensor 12 may be of interest to attach sensor 12 to a bridge support tower or other position in order to monitor the effects of such lateral forces on the structure.
- Resistance wire strain gauge 40 operates on the principal that as the structure responds to an applied load various expansions and contractions of the structural surface will occur and strain gauge 40 attached to the structure also will expand and contract producing a change in the resistance of foil resistance wire 42. This change in resistance of the circuit of sensor 12 is detected by detector-amplifier 14. This change in resistance can then be correlated with the load required to produce the degree of deformation in the structure detected by sensor 12.
- Sensor 12 also includes a second strain gauge, like that of Fig. 4, which is placed at a site near or on the structure which is unlikely to receive significant structural loading and therefore significant expansion or contraction.
- This resistance wire temperature sensor 12 is utilized to correct for temperature changes in strain sensor 12 which detects the structural strain. It will be appreciated that as sensor 12 in most cases will be located outside and subject to extremes of temperature, it is necessary to correct for the expansion and contraction of resistance wire 42 which occurs due to temperature effects.
- the second temperature sensor accomplishes this by being linked through a Wheatstone bridge to strain sensor 12. This will then compensate for changes in temperature of the sensor.
- Sensor 12 should be attached to the structure at locations for detection of maximum information related to structural integrity. This locating of sensor 12 is accomplished by performing a structural analysis on the specific structure in order to determine the locations of the structure displaying significant motion or actions. This then allows locating sensor 12 at the portion of the structure most responsive to loading and vibration. Such a structural analysis is a well known technique in the engineering art. The structural analysis also permits determination of the expected response of the structure through mathematical modeling. The modeling allows a comparison of the accuracy of the signal from sensor 12 with the calculated expected response from the model. This comparison is also conducted in practical fashion by loading the structure with a known mass and examining the detected response from sensor 12 for comparison with the calculated response of the mathematical model of the structure.
- Comparison of the expected response with the detected response is necessary in order to assure that sensor 12 is properly located and installed.
- the output from sensor 12 should be close to that response calculated by the structural analysis. If the calculated response and detected response are not similar, then sensor placement should be reexamined or the initial structural integrity should be reviewed.
- the second aspect of a comparison of the calculated response with the initial detected response is to provide baseline data on the structure for comparison with future information received from monitor 10.
- the existence of baseline data, taken soon after the completion of the structure, provides a point of comparison from which a reduction in structural integrity can be referenced.
- Another important aspect of obtaining the initial baseline data on the structure is for analysis of design procedures employed in the development of the structure. Design procedures that allow for excessive deflection or stress will be identified and can be eliminated from future structures. As no standard procedures currently exist for such verification of design procedures the present invention will provide the opportunity for effecting such an analysis in conjunction with monitoring the safety of the structure over its lifetime.
- Data reader 16 is intended to collect and store the information as each sensor 12 responds to stress in the structure. After data has been collected at data reader 16 it may then be processed on site by controller 18.
- the amplified signal from amplifier-detector 14 is read by data reader
- Data reader 16 converts the analog signal from amplifier-detector 14 into a digital array. This signal is further converted in order to analyze two measurements specific to the structure. First the signal is converted by Fourier transform to provide the frequency domain of the detected signal. Second the signal is then examined to determine points of greatest magnitude. The signal is also examined for other peaks of significance. Once the significant peaks of amplitude and frequency spectrum have been determined this will then represent a signature for the particular structure to be utilized in future analysis.
- the natural frequency of the structure also will change.
- a change in the natural frequency of a structure is an important indicator that deterioration of the structure is occurring meriting a more detailed analysis to determine the specific reasons for the cause of the change in the natural frequency.
- changes in the natural frequency of the structure can be determined by comparison with the baseline data.
- controller 18 After data reader 16 has converted and collected the data resulting from the output of amplifier detector 14, controller 18 records the maximum detected signal magnitude and the frequency at which it was detected. This data is stored in memory for future use. Each controller 18 is assigned an individual code to permit transmission of the data recorded in the controller 18 to a remote central location for analysis. If a controller 18 is attached to multiple sensors 12, each sensor 12 is connected to a separate channel within controller 18 and is assigned a secondary access code to allow individual data recording and transmission.
- Each monitor system 10 is equipped with a transmitter 20 and a receiver 22 in order that the data stored in controller 18 can be conveniently transmitted.
- Transmitter 20 and receiver 22 accomplish this purpose by allowing radio communication between controller 18 and the remote central data processing location.
- the central processing facility can transmit a message, including the individual code of the particular controller and code of the particular sensor channel, which is then received by antenna 26 and receiver 22.
- This allows initiation of a command to controller 18 and transmitter 20 to begin sending data via antenna 24 to the remote central processing location.
- This procedure also permits remote monitoring of the operation of monitor 10 and avoids the need to conduct on-site inspections to determine the operational status of monitor 10 and to retrieve data.
- Transmitter 20 and receiver 22 can be equipped to function with both local and satellite
- a vehicle can be equipped with the required communications equipment in order to serve as a mobile data collection and processing facility.
- Monitor 10 is powered, in a preferred embodiment, by battery 28 which is recharged by solar panel 32.
- Power lead 30 from battery 28 connects to each module of monitor 10 in order to power the system.
- the magnitude of the structure actions can be recorded as well as the particular frequency at which the maximum of the amplitude spectrum occurred. These two parameters are then compared with the baseline data of the structure as well as compared to future data on the structure. In this manner a complete structural history can be continually recorded, compared to previous data, and utilized for continuing structural analysis and for projecting determinations of needed structure replacement.
- FIG. 3 a flow chart of the method steps involved in conducting an analysis with structural monitor 10 is shown.
- the first step is selecting the structure for monitoring.
- Such a structure can be any bridge or building or transmission tower which is subject to ongoing and
- monitor locations 61 in order to situate sensors 12 of monitor 10 in positions on the structure demonstrating the greatest degree of action. This analysis is necessary in order to provide assurance that the forces to which the structure is subjected are detected, and to insure that the full effect of a force or load on the structure is determined.
- monitor 10 is then affixed 62 to the structure.
- monitor 10 may then be activated to receive data 64 from sensor 12. As previously discussed, the received data is then manipulated to analyze the frequency of maximum amplitude and that frequency at which the maximum amplitude occurred.
- the frequency and amplitude information may be transmitted to a central data processing facility either by manual collection from monitor 10 or through the use of transmitter receiver devices incorporated within structural monitor 10.
- this data may then be compared with the baseline data obtained in the step of reviewing with known loading 63 in order to provide reports 65 in which the monitor structure is evaluated and decisions as to structural maintenance and replacement may be made.
Abstract
A method and device are provided for sensing (12) and collecting (10) structural deformation data on structures over time to permit structural integrity analysis of the structure and determination of structure life expectancy and need for repair or reconstruction of the structure.
Description
STRUCTURAL MONITORING SYSTEM
Field of the Invention
This invention relates to monitoring and determination of the structural integrity of bridges, buildings, transmission towers and the like. Specifically, sensors are attached to the structure to measure various parameters of structural movement from which a baseline reading is determined which may then be compared with later readings from the same structure in order to determine changes in the natural frequency of the structure and decay of structural integrity.
Background of the Invention
All man-made structures are subject to stresses and strains during the course of their existence which directly affect the structural integrity of the object. In time, the accumulation of stress, strain and vibration can result in degradation of materials making up the structure and the points of attachment between materials. In the case of a transmission tower, the force of wind against the structure as well as ground transmitted vibration can degrade the structural integrity of the transmission tower. Similar types of stresses and vibration, and in particular earthquake vibration, can degrade multistory buildings. One particular structure which presents a continuing need for verification of structural integrity is the bridge or freeway overpass. These structures are continually subjected to repetitive loading, often in excess of limits, as well as both ground and traffic vibration. This results in deterioration of the bridge structure eventually requiring repair or replacement of the entire bridge itself.
Presently, however, determinations of structural integrity are generally estimated by assuming parameters of loading frequency and maximum loading weight in order to make an estimate of bridge life. These estimates combined with visual inspection have been utilized to determine when bridge replacement should occur or when a reduction in the posted weight limits of a bridge or highway overpass should be made.
For both safety and economy, it is desirable to accurately determine the structural integrity of a transmission tower, building or bridge. In the particular case of bridges and highway overpasses, it is necessary for state and federal governmental
entities to detect when bridge replacement should occur and to be able to forecast such replacements to avoid injuries and for proper financial management. This task is complicated by the fact that knowledge of the actual stresses to which any individual bridge has been subjected is largely unknown.
While estimations of traffic loading and stress and inspections of bridge exteriors can be made, structural degradation cannot be accurately predicted or determined as no means exist for documenting the stress history of a particular structure. Such loading history would allow engineers to determine whether a particular structure had been subjected to a greater or lesser degree of loading than estimated. This information would assist the ability to forecast bridge replacement in two ways-first, in making an early determination of which bridges are in fact structurally impaired, but not as yet exhibiting visible signs of degradation; and second, in determining which bridges may be selected for extended service due to fewer and lighter loading since their construction.
Therefore, it is an object of the present invention to provide a means for documenting the loading and vibrational stress applied to a structure during the lifetime of the structure;
Another object of the present invention is to allow comparisons to be made over the lifetime of a structure with baseline data on the particular structure in order to determine when sufficient structural degradation has occurred to require replacement;
Another object of the present invention is to provide a means of identifying which bridges and other structures may receive an extended useful life and to distinguish those structures from structures subject to overloading and a reduced structural lifetime; and
Yet another object of the present invention is to provide a means of forecasting the need to replace bridges and other structures through accumulation and comparison of structural stress and loading data on individual structures.
Other objects and advantages of this invention will become apparent from the following description taken in connection with the accompanying drawings, wherein is set forth by way of illustration and example, an embodiment of this invention.
Summary of the Invention
An apparatus and method are provided which enable the long-term analysis and evaluation of the structural integrity of transmission towers, buildings, bridges, freeway overpasses and the like in order to evaluate their useful life and present safety status. The method of analysis is accomplished through the use of an apparatus comprising strain gauge sensors applied to the structure at predetermined locations for measurement of structure maximum strain and maximum dynamic amplitude.
Data gathered by the sensors is then transmitted to a data recorder for storage of the collected data or to a computer for data analysis and comparison. The received data may then be transmitted to a central facility for comparison of data with baseline data on the particular structure and for analysis of structural
degradation and safety and for scheduling of structural repair or replacement.
Description of the Drawings
Fig. 1 is a schematic representation of the monitor system showing the sensors attached to the amplification, data recording, transmitting, and power equipment;
Fig. 2 shows a typical resistance wire strain gauge or sensor which is attached to the structure to be monitored; and
Fig. 3 is a flow chart of the method steps of the monitoring procedure.
Description of the Preferred Embodiment
Referring to Fig. 1 , the equipment modules of structural monitoring system 10 are shown in schematic representation. Sensor 12 is attached to critical areas of the structure to detect strain on the structure at points of significant amplitude. Selection of the points of attachment for sensor 12 is described
hereinafter. Sensor 12 is, in a preferred embodiment, an electrical resistance wire strain gauge 40 (Fig. 2). Strain gauge 40 is comprised of a foil resistance wire element 42 attached to an adhesive backing 44. Connector terminals 46 are at either end of resistance wire 42 and serve to connect the strain gauge to detector/amplifier 14.
Strain gauge 40 is attached to the structure at selected points in order to detect the maximum strain endured by the structure during various types of loading. For example, in the case of a bridge it is of interest to collect data on the point of critical strain generated by deflection of the road bed as traffic passes across it. In this manner, the impact of traffic on the structural integrity of the bridge roadway can be monitored. Alternatively, where wind induced swaying is a significant
consideration it may be of interest to attach sensor 12 to a bridge support tower or other position in order to monitor the effects of such lateral forces on the structure.
Resistance wire strain gauge 40 operates on the principal that as the structure responds to an applied load various expansions and contractions of the structural surface will occur and strain gauge 40 attached to the structure also will expand and contract producing a change in the resistance of foil resistance wire 42. This change in resistance of the circuit of sensor 12 is detected by detector-amplifier 14. This change in resistance can then be correlated with the load required to produce the degree of deformation in the structure detected by sensor 12.
Sensor 12 also includes a second strain gauge, like that of Fig. 4, which is placed at a site near or on the structure which is unlikely to receive significant structural loading and therefore significant expansion or contraction. This resistance wire temperature sensor 12 is utilized to correct for temperature changes in strain sensor 12 which detects the structural strain. It will be appreciated that as sensor 12 in most cases will be located outside and subject to extremes of temperature, it is necessary to correct for the expansion and contraction of resistance wire 42 which occurs due to temperature effects. The second temperature sensor accomplishes this by being linked through a Wheatstone bridge to strain sensor 12. This will then compensate for changes in temperature of the sensor.
Sensor 12 should be attached to the structure at locations for detection of maximum information related to structural integrity. This locating of sensor 12 is accomplished by performing a structural analysis on the specific structure in order to determine the locations of the structure displaying significant motion or actions. This then allows locating sensor 12 at the portion of the structure most responsive to loading and vibration. Such a structural analysis is a well known technique in the engineering art.
The structural analysis also permits determination of the expected response of the structure through mathematical modeling. The modeling allows a comparison of the accuracy of the signal from sensor 12 with the calculated expected response from the model. This comparison is also conducted in practical fashion by loading the structure with a known mass and examining the detected response from sensor 12 for comparison with the calculated response of the mathematical model of the structure.
Comparison of the expected response with the detected response is necessary in order to assure that sensor 12 is properly located and installed. The output from sensor 12 should be close to that response calculated by the structural analysis. If the calculated response and detected response are not similar, then sensor placement should be reexamined or the initial structural integrity should be reviewed.
The second aspect of a comparison of the calculated response with the initial detected response is to provide baseline data on the structure for comparison with future information received from monitor 10. The existence of baseline data, taken soon after the completion of the structure, provides a point of comparison from which a reduction in structural integrity can be referenced.
Another important aspect of obtaining the initial baseline data on the structure is for analysis of design procedures employed in the development of the structure. Design procedures that allow for excessive deflection or stress will be identified and can be eliminated from future structures. As no standard procedures currently exist for such verification of design procedures the present invention will provide the opportunity for effecting such an analysis in conjunction with monitoring the safety of the structure over its lifetime.
Once a signal has been detected by amplifier-detector 14 from sensor 12 it is transferred to data reader 16. Data reader 16 is intended to collect and store the information as each sensor 12 responds to stress in the structure. After data has been collected at data reader 16 it may then be processed on site by controller 18.
The amplified signal from amplifier-detector 14 is read by data reader
16. Data reader 16 converts the analog signal from amplifier-detector 14 into a digital array. This signal is further converted in order to analyze two measurements
specific to the structure. First the signal is converted by Fourier transform to provide the frequency domain of the detected signal. Second the signal is then examined to determine points of greatest magnitude. The signal is also examined for other peaks of significance. Once the significant peaks of amplitude and frequency spectrum have been determined this will then represent a signature for the particular structure to be utilized in future analysis.
All structural elements in structures vibrate at a frequency peculiar to that particular structure. This frequency is known in the art as the "natural
frequency" of the structure and is a function of both the structure's weight and stiffness. As the stiffness of the structure begins to change due to age and
deterioration, the natural frequency of the structure also will change. A change in the natural frequency of a structure is an important indicator that deterioration of the structure is occurring meriting a more detailed analysis to determine the specific reasons for the cause of the change in the natural frequency. As the present invention permits initial establishment of the baseline natural frequency of a structure and allows continuous monitoring of the structure, changes in the natural frequency of the structure can be determined by comparison with the baseline data.
After data reader 16 has converted and collected the data resulting from the output of amplifier detector 14, controller 18 records the maximum detected signal magnitude and the frequency at which it was detected. This data is stored in memory for future use. Each controller 18 is assigned an individual code to permit transmission of the data recorded in the controller 18 to a remote central location for analysis. If a controller 18 is attached to multiple sensors 12, each sensor 12 is connected to a separate channel within controller 18 and is assigned a secondary access code to allow individual data recording and transmission.
Each monitor system 10 is equipped with a transmitter 20 and a receiver 22 in order that the data stored in controller 18 can be conveniently transmitted. As many structures utilizing structural monitoring system 10 will be in distant locations or locations spread far from one another (i.e., remote transmission towers and bridges along a highway system) it is especially convenient if the data stored in controller 18 can be remotely accessed. Transmitter 20 and receiver 22
accomplish this purpose by allowing radio communication between controller 18 and the remote central data processing location.
As each controller 18 is assigned an individual code, the central processing facility can transmit a message, including the individual code of the particular controller and code of the particular sensor channel, which is then received by antenna 26 and receiver 22. This allows initiation of a command to controller 18 and transmitter 20 to begin sending data via antenna 24 to the remote central processing location. This procedure also permits remote monitoring of the operation of monitor 10 and avoids the need to conduct on-site inspections to determine the operational status of monitor 10 and to retrieve data. Transmitter 20 and receiver 22 can be equipped to function with both local and satellite
transmissions depending upon the remoteness of the location of the structure.
Alternatively, a vehicle can be equipped with the required communications equipment in order to serve as a mobile data collection and processing facility.
Monitor 10 is powered, in a preferred embodiment, by battery 28 which is recharged by solar panel 32. Power lead 30 from battery 28 connects to each module of monitor 10 in order to power the system.
Once data is received in the remote data processing location, the magnitude of the structure actions can be recorded as well as the particular frequency at which the maximum of the amplitude spectrum occurred. These two parameters are then compared with the baseline data of the structure as well as compared to future data on the structure. In this manner a complete structural history can be continually recorded, compared to previous data, and utilized for continuing structural analysis and for projecting determinations of needed structure replacement.
Referring now to Figure 3 a flow chart of the method steps involved in conducting an analysis with structural monitor 10 is shown. As previously discussed the first step is selecting the structure for monitoring. Such a structure can be any bridge or building or transmission tower which is subject to ongoing and
undetermined loads or forces which could compromise the structural integrity of the object. After the structure is selected it is then necessary to conduct the step of analyzing monitor locations 61 in order to situate sensors 12 of monitor 10 in
positions on the structure demonstrating the greatest degree of action. This analysis is necessary in order to provide assurance that the forces to which the structure is subjected are detected, and to insure that the full effect of a force or load on the structure is determined. After the optimal locations for structure movement have been determined, monitor 10 is then affixed 62 to the structure.
Once the monitor is in place on the structure it is then necessary to establish baseline information regarding the particular structure. This is conducted through the step of reviewing the structure with a known loading 63 in order to determine that the sensor is functioning properly and essentially to calibrate the sensor output with a known load. This step also provides a determination of the natural frequency of the structure at a time when it is known to be structurally sound. This natural frequency may then be compared with later collected data from the structure to analyze changes in the natural frequency of the structure indicative of structure degradation. Once the baseline data has been established, monitor 10 may then be activated to receive data 64 from sensor 12. As previously discussed, the received data is then manipulated to analyze the frequency of maximum amplitude and that frequency at which the maximum amplitude occurred. As the frequency and amplitude information is collected over time it may be transmitted to a central data processing facility either by manual collection from monitor 10 or through the use of transmitter receiver devices incorporated within structural monitor 10. When the data has been manipulated and pertinent information obtained on the current natural frequency of the structure, this data may then be compared with the baseline data obtained in the step of reviewing with known loading 63 in order to provide reports 65 in which the monitor structure is evaluated and decisions as to structural maintenance and replacement may be made.
It is to be understood that while certain forms of this invention have been illustrated and described, it is not limited thereto except insofar as such limitations are included in the following claims and allowable functional equivalents thereof.
Claims
1. The method of monitoring a structure such as a bridge or building or the like for determining the condition of the structure over time comprising the steps of:
Step a: analyzing the structure to determine a point of a
substantial structural action;
Step b: attaching a sensor to said analyzed point;
Step c: establishing a baseline of sensor frequency output an amplitude output in response to said structural action as a result of an applied load;
Step d: monitoring said action of the structure during use; Step e: recording sensor frequency output and amplitude output produced in response to said structural action detected by said sensor as a result of structure use;
Step f: comparing said recorded frequency and amplitude outpu with said baseline output in order to determine th structural condition of said structure with the passage of time, and
Step g: repeating steps d-f.
2. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein said sensor is a strain gauge attached to said structure.
3. The method as claimed in claim 2, wherein said strain gauge is connected with a second strain gauge for temperature compensation.
4. A method for determining changes in the structural deterioration of a structure comprising the steps of:
analyzing the structure to determine a point of the structure displaying a substantial action;
attaching a strain gauge sensor to said analyzed point;
monitoring a sensor frequency output and a sensor amplitude
output generated by said action;
determining from said sensor frequency output and a sensor
amplitude output a baseline natural frequency of vibration of the structure at a time soon after sensor attachment;
redetermining the natural frequency of the structure from said sensor frequency output and a sensor amplitude output at a time after the determination of said baseline; and
comparing the redetermined natural frequency of the structure with said baseline natural frequency of the structure to analyze deterioration in the structure.
5. The method as claimed in claim 4, further comprising the step of transmitting said monitored frequency and amplitude of said action to a remote location for determination and comparison of said structure natural frequency with said baseline.
6. An apparatus for detecting the deterioration in structural and integrity of a bridge or a structural tower or building comprising:
a sensor attached to the structure for detecting frequency and amplitude data corresponding to a strain in the structure du to forces applied to the structure,
a detector for receiving the output from said sensor,
a computer processor for reading and selecting frequency and amplitude data received from said sensor,
a means for receiving commands from a remote data processing location, and
a means for sending said data from the apparatus to said remot data processing facility to permit remote location
computation and comparison of the natural frequency of the structure .
7. The device as claimed in claim 6 further
comprising a battery to power said monitor.
8. The monitor as claimed in claim 7, wherein said battery is connected to a solar electricity generating panel for recharging said battery.
9. The apparatus as claimed in claim 6, wherein said means for sending data comprises a radio transmitter.
10. The apparatus as claimed in claim 6, wherein said means for receiving commands is a radio receiver.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US08/073,593 US5421204A (en) | 1993-06-08 | 1993-06-08 | Structural monitoring system |
| US08/073,593 | 1993-06-08 |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| WO1994029689A1 true WO1994029689A1 (en) | 1994-12-22 |
Family
ID=22114624
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/US1994/005766 WO1994029689A1 (en) | 1993-06-08 | 1994-05-23 | Structural monitoring system |
Country Status (3)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (2) | US5421204A (en) |
| CA (1) | CA2163653A1 (en) |
| WO (1) | WO1994029689A1 (en) |
Cited By (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ES2110353A2 (en) * | 1995-03-13 | 1998-02-01 | Rubino Miguel Martin | System for detecting and warning of deformation in a rigid structure. |
| WO2002008717A1 (en) * | 2000-07-24 | 2002-01-31 | Top System Co., Ltd | Remote monitoring method of structure |
| DE19504050C2 (en) * | 1995-02-08 | 2002-05-29 | Man Technologie Gmbh | Device for recording load cycles of supporting structures |
| DE10229448A1 (en) * | 2002-07-01 | 2004-01-29 | Christa Reiners | Device for checking a mast |
| EP3242972B1 (en) | 2015-01-05 | 2020-07-15 | BAE Systems PLC | Mobile bridge apparatus |
| US10982399B1 (en) * | 2020-04-16 | 2021-04-20 | EBJM Industries, LLC | Cable barrier system for use with cable barrier management system including turnbuckle subsystem, and method |
Families Citing this family (45)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US5533413A (en) * | 1994-06-30 | 1996-07-09 | Yokogawa Electric Corporation | Equipment diagnosis system |
| US5763788A (en) * | 1996-01-25 | 1998-06-09 | Man Technologie Ag | Portable device for counting and sorting load cycles in supporting structures with various loads |
| US5963884A (en) * | 1996-09-23 | 1999-10-05 | Machine Xpert, Llc | Predictive maintenance system |
| US6292108B1 (en) * | 1997-09-04 | 2001-09-18 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Standford Junior University | Modular, wireless damage monitoring system for structures |
| US6588282B2 (en) * | 1998-03-04 | 2003-07-08 | Microstrain, Inc. | Peak strain detection linear displacement sensor system for smart structures |
| DE60137122D1 (en) * | 2000-03-09 | 2009-02-05 | Smartsignal Corp | ANGLE-LIKE OPERATOR WITH GENERAL LENSING |
| US7739096B2 (en) * | 2000-03-09 | 2010-06-15 | Smartsignal Corporation | System for extraction of representative data for training of adaptive process monitoring equipment |
| US6957172B2 (en) * | 2000-03-09 | 2005-10-18 | Smartsignal Corporation | Complex signal decomposition and modeling |
| US6952662B2 (en) * | 2000-03-30 | 2005-10-04 | Smartsignal Corporation | Signal differentiation system using improved non-linear operator |
| US7233886B2 (en) * | 2001-01-19 | 2007-06-19 | Smartsignal Corporation | Adaptive modeling of changed states in predictive condition monitoring |
| GR1003797B (en) * | 2001-02-07 | 2002-02-08 | Τσελεντης Γερασιμος Παναγη | Stress-meter, system for recording, analysing and estimating the stress of installations from earthquakes and for warning the users of the installations |
| US7539597B2 (en) | 2001-04-10 | 2009-05-26 | Smartsignal Corporation | Diagnostic systems and methods for predictive condition monitoring |
| US20020183971A1 (en) * | 2001-04-10 | 2002-12-05 | Wegerich Stephan W. | Diagnostic systems and methods for predictive condition monitoring |
| US6975962B2 (en) * | 2001-06-11 | 2005-12-13 | Smartsignal Corporation | Residual signal alert generation for condition monitoring using approximated SPRT distribution |
| FR2827671A1 (en) * | 2001-07-18 | 2003-01-24 | Osmos Sa | Structure monitoring system uses networked sensors to plan maintenance and life |
| US6807862B2 (en) * | 2002-02-21 | 2004-10-26 | Sekos, Inc. | Device and method for determining and detecting the onset of structural collapse |
| KR100463727B1 (en) * | 2002-04-11 | 2004-12-29 | 백수곤 | The Method and Device of the Reliability Test and Decision |
| GB2387912A (en) * | 2002-04-26 | 2003-10-29 | Messier Dowty Inc | Monitoring parameters in structural components |
| DE102004040407B4 (en) * | 2004-08-19 | 2008-01-31 | Thiele Gmbh & Co. Kg | Device for determining the service life of mechanical equipment |
| US7281434B2 (en) * | 2003-03-27 | 2007-10-16 | Thiele Gmbh & Co. Kg | Service life sensor device |
| EP1606603A1 (en) * | 2003-03-27 | 2005-12-21 | Thiele GmbH & Co. KG | Service life sensor |
| AU2003253304A1 (en) * | 2003-08-01 | 2005-02-15 | Edil Control S.R.L. | Building structures monitoring system |
| US11710489B2 (en) | 2004-06-14 | 2023-07-25 | Wanda Papadimitriou | Autonomous material evaluation system and method |
| US11680867B2 (en) | 2004-06-14 | 2023-06-20 | Wanda Papadimitriou | Stress engineering assessment of risers and riser strings |
| US20060202844A1 (en) * | 2005-03-08 | 2006-09-14 | Simplexgrinnell Lp | Structure failure alert system |
| US20070221876A1 (en) * | 2005-03-09 | 2007-09-27 | Ansul Canada Ltd. | Systems and method of manufacturing a firefighting composition |
| DE102005018123B4 (en) * | 2005-04-20 | 2016-10-20 | Hottinger Baldwin Messtechnik Gmbh | Method for evaluating measured values for detecting material fatigue |
| GB0605188D0 (en) * | 2006-03-16 | 2006-04-26 | Pte Ltd | Lifetime damage monitor |
| US7987728B2 (en) * | 2006-07-07 | 2011-08-02 | The University Of Houston System | Piezoceramic-based smart aggregate for unified performance monitoring of concrete structures |
| US8275577B2 (en) | 2006-09-19 | 2012-09-25 | Smartsignal Corporation | Kernel-based method for detecting boiler tube leaks |
| US8311774B2 (en) | 2006-12-15 | 2012-11-13 | Smartsignal Corporation | Robust distance measures for on-line monitoring |
| GB0704878D0 (en) * | 2007-03-14 | 2007-04-18 | Trw Ltd | Aircraft landing gear monitoring apparatus |
| EP2130009A2 (en) * | 2007-03-29 | 2009-12-09 | Vestas Wind Systems A/S | Method for inspecting at least one rotor blade of a wind turbine and inspection system for at least one rotor blade of a wind turbine |
| CN101680753B (en) * | 2007-05-02 | 2012-07-18 | 弗莱克斯克工业有限公司 | Sensor device to monitor deformation in structural members, such as solid structures |
| WO2009124054A1 (en) * | 2008-03-31 | 2009-10-08 | Delta Technologies | System, device and associated methods for monitoring a physical condition or operating performance of a structure |
| US8610883B2 (en) * | 2008-06-16 | 2013-12-17 | Duhane Lam | Photoelastic layer with integrated polarizer |
| US8289160B1 (en) * | 2009-05-29 | 2012-10-16 | United Services Automobile Association (Usaa) | Systems and methods for recording and using information about conditions present in a house or other location |
| ES2364257B1 (en) * | 2010-01-05 | 2012-08-27 | Domotic Multimedia Application And Communication, S.L. | STRUCTURAL MONITORING SYSTEM. |
| JP5859979B2 (en) * | 2010-01-14 | 2016-02-16 | ベンチャー ゲイン リミテッド ライアビリティー カンパニー | Health indicators based on multivariate residuals for human health monitoring |
| WO2016092475A1 (en) | 2014-12-10 | 2016-06-16 | Okulov Paul D | Micro electro-mechanical strain displacement sensor and usage monitoring system |
| US10451500B2 (en) | 2014-12-22 | 2019-10-22 | Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation | Fiber optic weight sensor optimization for landing gear |
| JP6472893B2 (en) * | 2015-09-24 | 2019-02-20 | 富士フイルム株式会社 | Repair planning support system, method and program |
| US10732023B2 (en) | 2016-03-24 | 2020-08-04 | Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation | Measurement system for aircraft, aircraft having the same, and method of measuring weight for aircraft |
| US11181445B2 (en) | 2016-11-17 | 2021-11-23 | Heuristic Actions, Inc. | Devices, systems and methods, and sensor modules for use in monitoring the structural health of structures |
| DE102017130328B4 (en) | 2017-12-18 | 2019-10-10 | Thiele Gmbh & Co. Kg | Load-bearing component for chains |
Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US3688271A (en) * | 1970-08-10 | 1972-08-29 | Readex Electronics Inc | Method and apparatus for transmitting utility meter data to a remote mobile command unit |
| US4480480A (en) * | 1981-05-18 | 1984-11-06 | Scott Science & Technology, Inc. | System for assessing the integrity of structural systems |
| US4604706A (en) * | 1983-06-27 | 1986-08-05 | Integrated Sciences, Inc. | Apparatus for failure prediction of earth structures |
Family Cites Families (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4433581A (en) * | 1981-05-18 | 1984-02-28 | Scott David R | Offshore platform structural assessment system |
| US5111897A (en) * | 1990-09-27 | 1992-05-12 | Bridge Weighing Systems, Inc. | Bridge weigh-in-motion system |
-
1993
- 1993-06-08 US US08/073,593 patent/US5421204A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
1994
- 1994-05-23 WO PCT/US1994/005766 patent/WO1994029689A1/en active Application Filing
- 1994-05-23 CA CA002163653A patent/CA2163653A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
1995
- 1995-05-24 US US08/449,673 patent/US5507188A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Patent Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US3688271A (en) * | 1970-08-10 | 1972-08-29 | Readex Electronics Inc | Method and apparatus for transmitting utility meter data to a remote mobile command unit |
| US4480480A (en) * | 1981-05-18 | 1984-11-06 | Scott Science & Technology, Inc. | System for assessing the integrity of structural systems |
| US4604706A (en) * | 1983-06-27 | 1986-08-05 | Integrated Sciences, Inc. | Apparatus for failure prediction of earth structures |
Cited By (7)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DE19504050C2 (en) * | 1995-02-08 | 2002-05-29 | Man Technologie Gmbh | Device for recording load cycles of supporting structures |
| ES2110353A2 (en) * | 1995-03-13 | 1998-02-01 | Rubino Miguel Martin | System for detecting and warning of deformation in a rigid structure. |
| WO2002008717A1 (en) * | 2000-07-24 | 2002-01-31 | Top System Co., Ltd | Remote monitoring method of structure |
| DE10229448A1 (en) * | 2002-07-01 | 2004-01-29 | Christa Reiners | Device for checking a mast |
| EP3242972B1 (en) | 2015-01-05 | 2020-07-15 | BAE Systems PLC | Mobile bridge apparatus |
| US10982399B1 (en) * | 2020-04-16 | 2021-04-20 | EBJM Industries, LLC | Cable barrier system for use with cable barrier management system including turnbuckle subsystem, and method |
| US11939733B2 (en) | 2020-04-16 | 2024-03-26 | EBJM Industries, LLC | Cable barrier system for use with cable barrier management system including turnbuckle subsystem, and method |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CA2163653A1 (en) | 1994-12-22 |
| US5421204A (en) | 1995-06-06 |
| US5507188A (en) | 1996-04-16 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US5507188A (en) | Structural monitoring system | |
| Chen | Structural health monitoring of large civil engineering structures | |
| US6192758B1 (en) | Structure safety inspection | |
| RU2441788C2 (en) | Railway voltage monitoring system | |
| US4956999A (en) | Methods and apparatus for monitoring structural members subject to transient loads | |
| Dong et al. | Bridges structural health monitoring and deterioration detection-synthesis of knowledge and technology | |
| KR20040004232A (en) | Telemetry measurement system for short and long term infrastructure monitoring | |
| US5754122A (en) | System and method for monitoring structures | |
| CN105865522A (en) | Bridge structure monitoring system | |
| JPH02212734A (en) | Apparatus and method for detecting change in structual integrity of structural member | |
| KR20090065694A (en) | Apparatus and method of wireless measurement for structural monitoring | |
| Chakraborty et al. | Embedded ultrasonic transmission sensors and signal processing techniques for structural change detection in the Gliwice bridge | |
| KR20020051340A (en) | The measurable bridge bearing, the system there of, and the method of maintaining and controling a bridge by means of them | |
| CN113390540A (en) | Self-powered high-sensitivity bridge stress detection system and detection method | |
| KR100512123B1 (en) | Monitoring system of infrastructure using smart measurement system | |
| US20220042875A1 (en) | Methods and systems for damage evaluation of structural assets | |
| KR100710662B1 (en) | Fatigue intensity monitorring system of construction | |
| CN111854848A (en) | Health monitoring system and method for suspended monorail traffic structure | |
| CN107014328B (en) | Surface inhaul cable force measuring type geological disaster automatic monitoring device and method | |
| EP2965124B1 (en) | A system and method for evaluating a dam state | |
| CN212432227U (en) | Suspension type monorail transit structure health monitoring system | |
| EP3561614B1 (en) | Process for training a self-learning machine in a defect monitoring system | |
| CN114563040A (en) | Hydropower station hydraulic tunnel monitoring system and working method thereof | |
| CN111800754A (en) | Self-sensing and self-early warning temporary support system and construction method thereof | |
| HEIZA et al. | State of the art review of structural health monitoring for bridges using wireless system techniques |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): CA |
|
| AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE |
|
| DFPE | Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101) | ||
| 121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
| WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2163653 Country of ref document: CA |
|
| 122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase |