WO1996023529A1 - Biodegradation of volatile organic contaminants from air using biologically activated foam - Google Patents
Biodegradation of volatile organic contaminants from air using biologically activated foam Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO1996023529A1 WO1996023529A1 PCT/US1995/016998 US9516998W WO9623529A1 WO 1996023529 A1 WO1996023529 A1 WO 1996023529A1 US 9516998 W US9516998 W US 9516998W WO 9623529 A1 WO9623529 A1 WO 9623529A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- foam
- liquid
- voc
- vocs
- microorganisms
- Prior art date
Links
- 239000006260 foam Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 85
- 239000000356 contaminant Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 20
- 238000006065 biodegradation reaction Methods 0.000 title description 3
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 24
- 239000013530 defoamer Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 21
- 239000012530 fluid Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 11
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 7
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 claims description 33
- 244000005700 microbiome Species 0.000 claims description 30
- 239000007791 liquid phase Substances 0.000 claims description 29
- OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon Chemical compound [C] OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 25
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 claims description 24
- 238000006731 degradation reaction Methods 0.000 claims description 24
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 24
- 229910052799 carbon Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 23
- 239000004094 surface-active agent Substances 0.000 claims description 22
- 235000015097 nutrients Nutrition 0.000 claims description 17
- 230000000593 degrading effect Effects 0.000 claims description 11
- 239000007792 gaseous phase Substances 0.000 claims description 11
- 239000002028 Biomass Substances 0.000 claims description 9
- 239000002207 metabolite Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 230000004060 metabolic process Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- UHOVQNZJYSORNB-UHFFFAOYSA-N Benzene Chemical compound C1=CC=CC=C1 UHOVQNZJYSORNB-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 24
- YXFVVABEGXRONW-UHFFFAOYSA-N Toluene Chemical compound CC1=CC=CC=C1 YXFVVABEGXRONW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 24
- 238000012856 packing Methods 0.000 description 15
- 239000002609 medium Substances 0.000 description 13
- 239000012808 vapor phase Substances 0.000 description 12
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 description 7
- 241000894006 Bacteria Species 0.000 description 6
- 230000000813 microbial effect Effects 0.000 description 6
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 5
- IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Atomic nitrogen Chemical compound N#N IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 4
- 238000011109 contamination Methods 0.000 description 4
- 229930195733 hydrocarbon Natural products 0.000 description 4
- 150000002430 hydrocarbons Chemical class 0.000 description 4
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 4
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 239000004215 Carbon black (E152) Substances 0.000 description 3
- QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N atomic oxygen Chemical compound [O] QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 238000004140 cleaning Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000002485 combustion reaction Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000009792 diffusion process Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000000839 emulsion Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000009472 formulation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 229910052760 oxygen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 239000001301 oxygen Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 3
- 150000003839 salts Chemical class 0.000 description 3
- 239000007921 spray Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000011800 void material Substances 0.000 description 3
- 241000588986 Alcaligenes Species 0.000 description 2
- DBMJMQXJHONAFJ-UHFFFAOYSA-M Sodium laurylsulphate Chemical compound [Na+].CCCCCCCCCCCCOS([O-])(=O)=O DBMJMQXJHONAFJ-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 2
- 229910000831 Steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- NINIDFKCEFEMDL-UHFFFAOYSA-N Sulfur Chemical compound [S] NINIDFKCEFEMDL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000013504 Triton X-100 Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229920004890 Triton X-100 Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 150000007824 aliphatic compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 150000001491 aromatic compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 230000003115 biocidal effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000003139 biocide Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000005484 gravity Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000002401 inhibitory effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 150000002500 ions Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 230000000670 limiting effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002503 metabolic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- VNWKTOKETHGBQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N methane Chemical compound C VNWKTOKETHGBQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000002156 mixing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229910052757 nitrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000012071 phase Substances 0.000 description 2
- 235000014786 phosphorus Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 229920003023 plastic Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 239000004033 plastic Substances 0.000 description 2
- FGIUAXJPYTZDNR-UHFFFAOYSA-N potassium nitrate Chemical compound [K+].[O-][N+]([O-])=O FGIUAXJPYTZDNR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000010959 steel Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910052717 sulfur Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000011593 sulfur Substances 0.000 description 2
- 241000186216 Corynebacterium Species 0.000 description 1
- 239000004593 Epoxy Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920002449 FKM Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 101100270435 Mus musculus Arhgef12 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 241000187654 Nocardia Species 0.000 description 1
- OAICVXFJPJFONN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Phosphorus Chemical compound [P] OAICVXFJPJFONN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 241001296096 Probles Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000589776 Pseudomonas putida Species 0.000 description 1
- 239000004809 Teflon Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920006362 Teflon® Polymers 0.000 description 1
- XSTXAVWGXDQKEL-UHFFFAOYSA-N Trichloroethylene Chemical group ClC=C(Cl)Cl XSTXAVWGXDQKEL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- QOTAEASRCGCJDN-UHFFFAOYSA-N [C].CO Chemical compound [C].CO QOTAEASRCGCJDN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000009825 accumulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002411 adverse Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910052921 ammonium sulfate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000003556 assay Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004166 bioassay Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000012620 biological material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000006227 byproduct Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000007084 catalytic combustion reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 241000902900 cellular organisms Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000001311 chemical methods and process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000012141 concentrate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000470 constituent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910000366 copper(II) sulfate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000002939 deleterious effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006866 deterioration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910000397 disodium phosphate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000012153 distilled water Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004945 emulsification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000855 fermentation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004151 fermentation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000013305 food Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000012737 fresh medium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011521 glass Substances 0.000 description 1
- 150000004676 glycans Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 230000036541 health Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011534 incubation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 150000002576 ketones Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 229910052943 magnesium sulfate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910000357 manganese(II) sulfate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001404 mediated effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007269 microbial metabolism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910000402 monopotassium phosphate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 231100000252 nontoxic Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 230000003000 nontoxic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012261 overproduction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052698 phosphorus Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000011574 phosphorus Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000035790 physiological processes and functions Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009428 plumbing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229920002857 polybutadiene Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920001282 polysaccharide Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000005017 polysaccharide Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000004800 polyvinyl chloride Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001737 promoting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001105 regulatory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000241 respiratory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000029058 respiratory gaseous exchange Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000002966 serum Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000002356 single layer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011734 sodium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000001179 sorption measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910001220 stainless steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000010935 stainless steel Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000013619 trace mineral Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000011573 trace mineral Substances 0.000 description 1
- CMMXCVYESRODNH-UHFFFAOYSA-N trichloroepoxyethane Chemical class ClC1OC1(Cl)Cl CMMXCVYESRODNH-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- UBOXGVDOUJQMTN-UHFFFAOYSA-N trichloroethylene Natural products ClCC(Cl)Cl UBOXGVDOUJQMTN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 235000013343 vitamin Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000011782 vitamin Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229940088594 vitamin Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 229930003231 vitamin Natural products 0.000 description 1
- 238000005406 washing Methods 0.000 description 1
- -1 which is recovered Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002676 xenobiotic agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000002034 xenobiotic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D19/00—Degasification of liquids
- B01D19/0042—Degasification of liquids modifying the liquid flow
- B01D19/0047—Atomizing, spraying, trickling
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61L—METHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
- A61L9/00—Disinfection, sterilisation or deodorisation of air
- A61L9/01—Deodorant compositions
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D19/00—Degasification of liquids
- B01D19/02—Foam dispersion or prevention
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02A—TECHNOLOGIES FOR ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02A50/00—TECHNOLOGIES FOR ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE in human health protection, e.g. against extreme weather
- Y02A50/20—Air quality improvement or preservation, e.g. vehicle emission control or emission reduction by using catalytic converters
Definitions
- a bioreactor and method are described for degrading volatile organic contaminants (VOCs) present in air streams using a biologically activated foam.
- VOCs volatile organic contaminants
- VOC contamination is of great interest to health and regulatory agencies, and removal of VOCs from the environment has increasingly become a national goal.
- VOC removal schemes rely on volatilization of the contaminants, with subsequent transport from the contamination site on a stream of air. Additionally, in the case of industrial processes, VOCs can be released directly to the atmosphere. As a consequence, there is a great need to develop methods for removing VOCs from air in a cost effective manner.
- Biological treatment methods for VOC removal from air offer many advantages over physico-chemical processes. As the concentration of VOCs falls significantly below the lean combustion limit, the efficiency of engines and catalytic combustion declines, requiring an increased cost in energy input compared to biological removal methods.
- biological treatment methods as with GAC, the contaminants are captured by a medium (a biofilm on a support). Unlike GAC, however, biological treatment methods degrade the contaminants to harmless products directly, negating the requirement for further treatment off site.
- vapor phase bioreactors biofilters
- Current state-of-the-art vapor phase bioreactors are typically containments filled with an internal packing which is colonized by VOC-degradi ⁇ g microorganisms, which may or may not actively interact with the VOCs.
- Contaminated air is introduced into the reactor, while a liquid medium containing a source of nitrogen, phosphorus, sulfur, and other inorganic trace elements necessary for microbial development is pumped over the packing.
- a liquid medium containing a source of nitrogen, phosphorus, sulfur, and other inorganic trace elements necessary for microbial development is pumped over the packing.
- the resultant biofilm of organisms that develops on the packing degrades the VOC(s) of interest to C0 2 and water.
- the processing capacity of these reactors is a function of the transport of contaminant carbon to the biofilm on the packing, which can become rate limiting when VOCs of low solubility, such as many gasoline constituents, are processed. Therefore, it is often desirable to construct vapor-phase reactors using packings wi very high surface/volume ratios. This results, however, in smaller void spaces between the packing particles in ord to keep the size of the reactor vessel within practical limits.
- Cleaning methodologies usually involve washing the packing, either while in the reactor vessel or aft removal. In either case, the reactor must be taken off-line for cleaning, resulting in an overall decrease in the amou of VOCs which can be processed in a given period of time. In a worst case, biofouli ⁇ g can require complete remov of the packing and replacement, which is very expensive because the cost of the packing is often the majo component of the reactor's construction cost.
- a method of degrading volatil organic contaminants includes generating a foam by incorporating VOC-containi ⁇ g air into liquid containing a surfactant, nutrients, and VOC-degrading microorganisms.
- the VOCs are degraded into CO- an other degradation components through metabolism by the microorganisms.
- the method can additionally included breaking the foam into a liquid phase, which is recovered, and a gaseous phase, which is released.
- the recovere liquid phase can be treated to maintain a desired level of surfactant, nutrients, and microorganisms.
- VOC containing air can be incorporated into the treated liquid phase to regenerate the foam.
- the foregoing steps ca be repeated a plurality of times or performed simultaneously.
- the bioreactor includes a foam generator, a reaction pipe, and a defoamer.
- the foam generator generate a foam by incorporating VOC-containing air into a liquid containing a surfactant, nutrients, and VOC-degrading microorganisms.
- the liquid can additionally contain carbon-based cofactors or co-metabolites which do not interfere with degradation of VOCs.
- the foam generator can include a first port for receiving the VOC-containing air, a second port for receiving the liquid containing the VOC-degrading microorganisms, and a mixer for mechanically combining the VOC-containing air with the liquid to create a biologically activated foam.
- the liquid contains no substantial source of carbon usable as a feedstock to the microorganisms. In other embodiments, the liquid contains no substantial source of carbon.
- the reaction pipe is in fluid communication with the foam generator.
- the foam produced by the foam generator flows at a sufficiently slow rate through the reaction pipe, and the reaction pipe has a sufficient length to allow time for the microorganisms to degrade the VOCs into C0 2 and other degradation components.
- the foam After flowing through the reaction pipe, the foam enters the defoamer, which is in fluid communication with the reaction pipe.
- the defoamer has an effluent port for releasing the C0 2 derived from the biodegraded VOCs.
- the defoamer can be a liquid sprayer, which mechanically disrupts the biologically activated foam.
- the bioreactor can additionally include a chemostat.
- the chemostat is connected in series between the defoamer and the foam generator.
- the chemostat is configured to modify the liquid phase recovered from the defoamer so that the liquid phase contains appropriate amounts of surfactant, nutrients, and microorganisms.
- the chemostat can be configured to activate a removal pump when removal of biomass is required to maintain a physiological parameter within a desired range.
- the chemostat can also be configured to activate an addition pump when addition of medium is required to maintain a physiological parameter within a desired range.
- the foam can be produced by mechanically combining a gaseous phase containing VOCs with a liquid phase containing nutrients and VOC-degrading microorganisms.
- the liquid phase can also include a surfactant.
- the liquid phase contains no substantial source of carbon usable as a feedstock to the microorganisms.
- FIGURE 1 is a schematic representation of a biologically activated foam according to the present invention.
- FIGURE 2 is a schematic representation of a biologically activated foam reactor according to the present invention.
- FIGURES 3A and 3B graphically depict the degradation of benzene and toluene, respectively, in a biologically activated foam reactor according to the present invention.
- FIGURES 4A and 4B graphically depict the percentage of degradation of benzene and toluene, respectively, in a biologically activated foam reactor according to the present invention compared to that of a conventional fixed- film reactor.
- the biologically activated foam of this asp of the invention is illustrated in FIGURE 1.
- the foam comprises a liquid phase and a gaseous phase.
- the liq phase includes one or more VOC-degrading microorganisms and nutrients therefor.
- the liquid phase al includes a surfactant to enhance emulsification.
- the gaseous phase includes the VOCs to be degraded.
- the foam is preferably semi-stable, having a bubble lifetime of greater than one minute.
- t foam is composed of bubbles less than approximately 1,000 micrometers in diameter, and more preferably 100-1,0 micrometers in diameter.
- the approximate gas content of the foam is preferably at least 80%.
- the foam's hi surface area/volume ratio preferably from approximately 8,000 to 80,000 m 2 /m 3 , favors efficient mass transpo especially of lower solubility compounds.
- the walls of the bubbles act as a support for the VO degrading microorganisms suspended therein.
- the resultant thin biofilm is essentially a monolayer, exposed on bo sides to air. Oxygen transport is maximized in this film, eliminating diffusion limitations to the VOC-degradi organisms.
- VOCs As the organisms suspended within the liquid film respire, they convert the VOCs to C0 2 , which rapid diffuses into the gas space of the bubble.
- gas transport through the biologically activated foam of t present invention is not adversely affected by the overproduction of organisms or their metabolic products becau the active biofilm is produced and maintained at a stable thickness each time a foam bubble is formed.
- t present invention's emulsion of gas and liquid provides a dynamic bioreactor packing which promotes maxim degradation of VOCs.
- a variety of microorganisms can be us to degrade VOCs.
- microbes selected can be adjusted for optimum degradation of the particular VOCs desir to be degraded.
- Microbes that can be incorporated into the liquid phase of the foam may include any VOC-degradi organisms.
- bacteria of the genera Pseudomo ⁇ as, Nocardia, Corynebacterium, and Alcalige ⁇ es can used.
- the microbes can be either native or bioengineered.
- the microorganisms can be utilized as pure cultures in combination as consortia.
- Nutrients contained in the liquid phase of the foam include inorganic nutrients, such as nitrogen, phosphoru and sulfur, as well as all other elements required for microbial growth on simple carbon sources.
- the liquid phase contains no substantial source of carbon.
- the liquid phase of this embodime can contain carbon derived from microbial metabolism as well as carbon-based surfactants and vitamins, which not interfere with degradation of the VOC carbon in the gaseous phase of the foam.
- the liqui phase can contain carbon-based co-factors and co-metabolites which do not interfere with degradation of the VO carbon. These cofactors or co-metabolites can aid in the degradation of VOC carbon in the gaseous phase.
- methane can be used as a co-metabolite in the degradation of trichloroethylene.
- the temperature and p are chosen to optimize metabolism of the microbes or microbial consortia. For many VOC-degrading microbes, roo temperature is preferred and pH is preferably maintained in the range of approximately 6.8-7.8.
- An exemplar medium formulation is presented below in Table I. Table I Formulation of HCMM2 Minimal Salts Medium
- Surfactants are chosen based on biocompatibility with the microorganisms being used.
- exemplary surfactants include, but are not limited to, Triton X-100, Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), Nonidet P-40, and silicon- based formulations such as DC- 193.
- the surfactants preferably do not provide the organisms with a metabolizable source of carbon as determined by appropriate bioassays.
- VOCs amenable to treatment using the foam include naturally occurring or xenobiotic aromatic and aliphatic compounds with vapor pressures sufficient to allow transport in the vapor phase.
- Exemplary compounds include gasoline hydrocarbons, trichloroethylene, ethers, and ketones of industrial importance.
- the bioreactor 10 preferably includes three basic system components: (a) a foam generator 15; (b) a reaction pipe 20; and (c) a defoamer 25. in a particularly preferred embodiment, the bioreactor 10 also includes a chemostat 30 configured to maintain a preferred physiological state of the biomass.
- the foam generator 15 produces foam by combining VOC-containing air with a liquid based nutrient- containing medium, microorganisms and preferably a surfactant.
- the foam thus produced is similar to that described above in relation to the first aspect of the present invention.
- Commercially available devices used to generate the foam preferably allow passive introduction of the VOC-containing air, so that additional compressors are not necessary.
- the foam generator 15 allows for controlled introduction of the VOC-containing air.
- t VOC-containing air can be introduced to the low pressure side of a centrifugal or gearhead fluid pump 35 where is mechanically mixed with the liquid by the action of the pump mechanism.
- the VOC-containing air can also introduced into a venturi mixing device where static mixers produce the emulsion of air and liquid.
- the reaction pipe 20 is in fluid communication with the foam generator 15. Foam produced by the foa generator 15 is allowed to flow continuously into the reaction pipe 20.
- the dimensions of the reaction pipe 20 a chosen such that for a given rate of foam generation, the foam's incubation time in the reaction pipe 20 is sufficie to allow for a desired degree of degradation of the VOCs into C0 2 and other degradation components.
- the reacti pipe 20 can be oriented a number of ways, including horizontally or vertically.
- the reaction pipe 20 preferab maintains plug-flow conditions to prevent mixing of the influent and effluent foam.
- the foam After incubating in the reaction pipe 20, the foam enters the defoamer 25, which breaks the foam into i fluid and gaseous components.
- the foam can be disrupted by any of a number of methods well known to tho of skill in the art. Preferably, defoaming does not chemically alter the resulting liquid component. Exempla defoami ⁇ g methods include thermal disruption, such as by heated wire grids or air streams; and mechanical agitatio such as by liquid spray 35 or centrifugal force.
- the defoamer preferably allows for complete separation of the liqu and gaseous components of the foam emulsion.
- Defoamed liquid is recovered from the defoamer by any of a numb of well-known means, such as gravity flow, while the gaseous component is allowed to diffuse into the atmospher or into a collection manifold for further processing by one or more serial vapor phase reactors.
- the chemostat 30 provides a means for modifying the liquid phase recovered from the defoamer 25.
- Th chemostat is equipped with sensing devices designed to monitor parameters of physiological significance, such Ph, conductivity, microbe concentration, temperature, surfactant concentration, fluid level, and specific ion a nutrient concentrations.
- the chemostat is connected in series between the defoamer and the foa generator. Defoamed liquid is introduced into the chemostat unit 25, preferably by passive means.
- the parameters can be adjusted automatically or manually to optimize metabolism of the microbes or microbi consortia. Exemplary adjustments include addition of fresh medium/surfactant through a medium addition inlet 4 and removal of excess biomass developed as a result of microbial growth during the process through a bioma removal outlet 45.
- Optimal bioreactor physiologic parameters are established either by previous bench experiments or empiricall during reactor start-up. Physiologic parameters are maintained during operation of the bioreactor. For exampl distilled water can be added to make up for evaporative losses, or medium can be added to replace nutrient ion taken up into biomass and fluid lost due to removal of the microbes. However, the liquid phase in the reactor i preferably maintained as closed-loop as possible.
- the bioreactor is constructed from nontoxic materials unaffected by either the VOC-degradin microorganisms, or the VOCs being treated. Suitable materials include PVC plastic, epoxy-coated steel, and stainle steel. Gaskets, valves, pipes and other plumbing-related components are chosen to conform to the same requiremen as the bioreactor, and materials used include PVC, stainless steel, Teflon, Viton, buna rubber, or other VOC-resistant materials.
- VOC-contaminated air enters the bioreactor through an air metering valve 50 at the inlet 55 of the foam generating pump.
- the VOC-contaminated air is combined with liquid containing microbes, nutrients, and surfactant.
- the resultant combination is pumped by the foam generator pump 35 into a static in-line mixer 60, where the air and liquid are entrained into a semi-stable biologically activated foam.
- the foam is displaced into the reaction pipe 20. As the foam continues to enter the reaction pipe 20, it is displaced along the length of the reaction pipe while incubating therein.
- Foam subsequently enters the defoamer 25 where a liquid spray 35 impinges on it, breaking the bubbles and releasing gaseous products such as C0 2 into an exhaust manifold 62.
- the recovered liquid phase drains by gravity to the bottom of the defoamer. Some of the recovered liquid is pumped through the spray nozzle of the defoamer by a defoaming pump 65. The majority of the recovered liquid, however, is directed into the chemostat 30 for monitoring. If necessary, the quality of the monitored liquid phase is adjusted to maintain desired physiological parameters by addition of medium or water through the addition inlet 40 or removal of biomass through the removal outlet 45.
- the chemostat 25 can be configured to activate an addition pump 60 or a removal pump 75 when physiological parameters so require.
- the liquid phase is then recycled into the foam generator and the foam generation cycle repeated. The foregoing steps can also be performed simultaneously.
- Example A reactor was constructed from PVC plastic and operated on the laboratory bench for a period of 74 hours.
- the reactor had a reaction pipe foam capacity of 1.13 liters, a liquid capacity of 600 milliliters and was operated at air flow rates ranging from 100-150 milliliters per minute.
- the HCMM2 minimal salts medium described above in Table I was used, and the surfactant was Triton X-100 at 0.03% v/v concentration. This surfactant concentration produced a foam of approximately 70-80% gas volume without substantially inhibiting microbial growth as determined by assays using Pseudomonas putida in R2A medium.
- VOC-laden air was produced by volatilization of contaminants in a vapor generator consisting of a four-liter glass jar ported into the bioreactor. Selected hydrocarbon contaminants were introduced by use of septum-capped serum bottles pierced with hypodermic needles of varying bores to regulate diffusion of the compounds into the atmosphere in the jar. A mass-flow meter monitored the air flow rate through the vapor generator. Typical vapor phase concentrations of contaminants produced by this procedure ranged from 100-700 micromoles of contaminant carbon per liter of air.
- the concentration of VOCs in the reactor influent and effluent was monitored every two hours using an on-line gas chromatograph.
- the reactor was operated for approximately six hours before a consortium of gasoline-degrading bacteria was added.
- this consortium was initially obtained from a monitoring well sample at a gasoline contaminated site on the Seal Beach Naval Weapons Station, Seal Beach, California.
- gasoli degrading bacteria of the genus Pse ⁇ domonas dominate the site, including Ps. aeruginosa, Ps. putida, Ps. st ⁇ tze Ps. fl ⁇ orescens, Ps.
- Bacteria isolated from the resultant microbi community in the reactor were found capable of degrading a wide variety of aliphatic and aromatic compounds sole carbon and energy sources, including both benzene and toluene. Reactor operation continued until approximately 52 hours, at which time a biocide, isothiazoli ⁇ one (Nal
- both benzene and toluene were degraded by the consortium present in t biologically activated foam. Degradation was not observed until the addition of bacteria, and then rapidly increas as the biota developed in the reactor. The reactor was able to degrade 41.5 ⁇ 4.84 percent of the benzene load and 49.5 ⁇ 16.8 percent of the toluene loaded under the conditions of the experiment. Addition of the biocide 52 hours led to a rapid deterioration in reactor performance, indicating that degradation was mediated by t microbial population.
- FIGURE 4 illustrates the performance of the activated foam reactor of the present invention compared t a conventional fixed-film vapor phase reactor operating under similar conditions. As shown in FIGURE 4, at man sample points the percentage of benzene and toluene degradation by the activated foam reactor of the prese invention was over twice that of a conventional fixed-film vapor phase reactor.
Abstract
A bioreactor (10) is disclosed which degrades volatile organic contaminants (VOCs) from air using biologically activated foam. The reactor includes a foam generator (15), a reaction pipe (20) in fluid communication with the foam generator and a defoamer (25) in fluid communication with the reaction pipe. The reactor can also include a chemostat (30).
Description
BIODEGRADATION OF VOLATILE ORGANIC CONTAMINANTS FROM AIR USING BIOLOGICALLY ACTIVATED FOAM
Field of the Invention A bioreactor and method are described for degrading volatile organic contaminants (VOCs) present in air streams using a biologically activated foam.
Background of the Invention
Environmental contamination by volatile organic contaminants (VOCs) released both by unintentional means and as a byproduct of industrial processes has become a major environmental issue in the latter part of this century.
Deleterious long and short-term effects on humans as a result of exposure to many of these compounds have been fairly well documented. As a consequence, VOC contamination is of great interest to health and regulatory agencies, and removal of VOCs from the environment has increasingly become a national goal.
Many VOC removal schemes rely on volatilization of the contaminants, with subsequent transport from the contamination site on a stream of air. Additionally, in the case of industrial processes, VOCs can be released directly to the atmosphere. As a consequence, there is a great need to develop methods for removing VOCs from air in a cost effective manner.
Current on-site technology for the physico-chemical removal of VOCs from air includes (1) conversion to harmless products such as CO- and water by combustion, and (2) entrainment in absorptive media such as granular activated carbon (GAC). Combustion of VOCs, though commonly performed, is not cost effective unless the concentration of contaminants is relatively high. As the concentration of VOCs declines, entrainment methods such as GAC adsorption are often utilized. Entrainment methods, however, do not modify the contaminants, but instead concentrate them on a fixed medium which must then be transferred off site for further treatment.
Biological treatment methods for VOC removal from air offer many advantages over physico-chemical processes. As the concentration of VOCs falls significantly below the lean combustion limit, the efficiency of engines and catalytic combustion declines, requiring an increased cost in energy input compared to biological removal methods. In biological treatment methods, as with GAC, the contaminants are captured by a medium (a biofilm on a support). Unlike GAC, however, biological treatment methods degrade the contaminants to harmless products directly, negating the requirement for further treatment off site.
Agencies responsible for the removal of VOC contamination from the environment have therefore become increasingly interested in the development of vapor phase bioreactors (biofilters). Current state-of-the-art vapor phase bioreactors are typically containments filled with an internal packing which is colonized by VOC-degradiπg microorganisms, which may or may not actively interact with the VOCs. Contaminated air is introduced into the reactor, while a liquid medium containing a source of nitrogen, phosphorus, sulfur, and other inorganic trace elements necessary for microbial development is pumped over the packing. Through respiration, the resultant biofilm of organisms that develops on the packing degrades the VOC(s) of interest to C02 and water. The processing capacity of these reactors is a function of the transport of contaminant carbon to the biofilm on the packing, which can become rate limiting when VOCs of low solubility, such as many gasoline
constituents, are processed. Therefore, it is often desirable to construct vapor-phase reactors using packings wi very high surface/volume ratios. This results, however, in smaller void spaces between the packing particles in ord to keep the size of the reactor vessel within practical limits.
Maximal degradation of VOCs occurs in vapor phase reactors when biofilm organisms are expending ener for growth, and thus have large requirements for respiratory carbon. Large amounts of VOC carbon can be process by these reactors under this condition. However, as biomass accumulates on the fixed packing, two basic proble develop. First, diffusion of oxygen into the biofilms can become limiting, especially with relatively soluble VOCs suc as benzene and toluene. This tends to limit the efficiency of the biofilm. Second, and more importantly from a operating standpoint, accumulation of biomass and metabolic products such as extracellular polysaccharides can bloc the void spaces in the reactor. This is especially true when high surface area/volume packing is used. As biologic material fills the void spaces, contaminated air flow follows the path of least resistance and can exclude larg portions of the packing from gas exchange. This effect leads to a precipitous decline in reactor performance an necessitates cleaning the packing to remove the superfluous biomass.
Cleaning methodologies usually involve washing the packing, either while in the reactor vessel or aft removal. In either case, the reactor must be taken off-line for cleaning, resulting in an overall decrease in the amou of VOCs which can be processed in a given period of time. In a worst case, biofouliπg can require complete remov of the packing and replacement, which is very expensive because the cost of the packing is often the majo component of the reactor's construction cost.
Thus, there is a great need for a cost effective vapor phase bioreactor which utilizes a packing materi having a high surface area/volume ratio; which maintains a biofilm of a controlled, uniform thinness; and which doe not biofoul under conditions promoting maximal rates of VOC biodegradation.
The use of microorganisms in a foam has been described for a purpose unrelated to VOC degradation. U. Patent No. 3,982,998 to Hitzman, et al., which is incorporated herein by reference, discloses a process for producin a proteinaceous food product using methaπol foam fermentation by microorganisms. The methanol carbon sourc in Hitzman is supplied in the liquid phase.
Summary of the Invention In accordance with a first aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method of degrading volatil organic contaminants (VOCs). The method includes generating a foam by incorporating VOC-containiπg air into liquid containing a surfactant, nutrients, and VOC-degrading microorganisms. The VOCs are degraded into CO- an other degradation components through metabolism by the microorganisms. The method can additionally includ breaking the foam into a liquid phase, which is recovered, and a gaseous phase, which is released. The recovere liquid phase can be treated to maintain a desired level of surfactant, nutrients, and microorganisms. In addition, VOC containing air can be incorporated into the treated liquid phase to regenerate the foam. The foregoing steps ca be repeated a plurality of times or performed simultaneously. In accordance with a second aspect of the present invention, there is provided a bioreactor for degradin
VOCs. The bioreactor includes a foam generator, a reaction pipe, and a defoamer. The foam generator generate
a foam by incorporating VOC-containing air into a liquid containing a surfactant, nutrients, and VOC-degrading microorganisms. The liquid can additionally contain carbon-based cofactors or co-metabolites which do not interfere with degradation of VOCs. The foam generator can include a first port for receiving the VOC-containing air, a second port for receiving the liquid containing the VOC-degrading microorganisms, and a mixer for mechanically combining the VOC-containing air with the liquid to create a biologically activated foam. In some embodiments, the liquid contains no substantial source of carbon usable as a feedstock to the microorganisms. In other embodiments, the liquid contains no substantial source of carbon. The reaction pipe is in fluid communication with the foam generator.
The foam produced by the foam generator flows at a sufficiently slow rate through the reaction pipe, and the reaction pipe has a sufficient length to allow time for the microorganisms to degrade the VOCs into C02 and other degradation components. After flowing through the reaction pipe, the foam enters the defoamer, which is in fluid communication with the reaction pipe. The defoamer has an effluent port for releasing the C02 derived from the biodegraded VOCs. The defoamer can be a liquid sprayer, which mechanically disrupts the biologically activated foam.
In one embodiment, the bioreactor can additionally include a chemostat. In this embodiment, the chemostat is connected in series between the defoamer and the foam generator. The chemostat is configured to modify the liquid phase recovered from the defoamer so that the liquid phase contains appropriate amounts of surfactant, nutrients, and microorganisms. The chemostat can be configured to activate a removal pump when removal of biomass is required to maintain a physiological parameter within a desired range. The chemostat can also be configured to activate an addition pump when addition of medium is required to maintain a physiological parameter within a desired range.
In accordance with a third aspect of the present invention, there is provided a foam for degrading VOCs.
The foam can be produced by mechanically combining a gaseous phase containing VOCs with a liquid phase containing nutrients and VOC-degrading microorganisms. The liquid phase can also include a surfactant. In one embodiment, the liquid phase contains no substantial source of carbon usable as a feedstock to the microorganisms.
Brief Description of the Drawings FIGURE 1 is a schematic representation of a biologically activated foam according to the present invention. FIGURE 2 is a schematic representation of a biologically activated foam reactor according to the present invention. FIGURES 3A and 3B graphically depict the degradation of benzene and toluene, respectively, in a biologically activated foam reactor according to the present invention.
FIGURES 4A and 4B graphically depict the percentage of degradation of benzene and toluene, respectively, in a biologically activated foam reactor according to the present invention compared to that of a conventional fixed- film reactor. Detailed Description of the Invention
In accordance with a first aspect of the present invention, there is provided a biologically activated fo for cost effective degradation of volatile organic contaminants (VOCs). The biologically activated foam of this asp of the invention is illustrated in FIGURE 1. The foam comprises a liquid phase and a gaseous phase. The liq phase includes one or more VOC-degrading microorganisms and nutrients therefor. Preferably, the liquid phase al includes a surfactant to enhance emulsification. The gaseous phase includes the VOCs to be degraded.
The foam is preferably semi-stable, having a bubble lifetime of greater than one minute. Preferably, t foam is composed of bubbles less than approximately 1,000 micrometers in diameter, and more preferably 100-1,0 micrometers in diameter. The approximate gas content of the foam is preferably at least 80%. The foam's hi surface area/volume ratio, preferably from approximately 8,000 to 80,000 m2/m3, favors efficient mass transpo especially of lower solubility compounds. Additionally, the walls of the bubbles act as a support for the VO degrading microorganisms suspended therein. The resultant thin biofilm is essentially a monolayer, exposed on bo sides to air. Oxygen transport is maximized in this film, eliminating diffusion limitations to the VOC-degradi organisms. As the organisms suspended within the liquid film respire, they convert the VOCs to C02, which rapid diffuses into the gas space of the bubble. Unlike conventional fixed-film reactor systems, gas transport through the biologically activated foam of t present invention is not adversely affected by the overproduction of organisms or their metabolic products becau the active biofilm is produced and maintained at a stable thickness each time a foam bubble is formed. Thus, t present invention's emulsion of gas and liquid provides a dynamic bioreactor packing which promotes maxim degradation of VOCs. As will be readily apparent to one having ordinary skill in the art, a variety of microorganisms can be us to degrade VOCs. The microbes selected can be adjusted for optimum degradation of the particular VOCs desir to be degraded. Microbes that can be incorporated into the liquid phase of the foam may include any VOC-degradi organisms. For example, bacteria of the genera Pseudomoπas, Nocardia, Corynebacterium, and Alcaligeπes can used. The microbes can be either native or bioengineered. The microorganisms can be utilized as pure cultures in combination as consortia.
Nutrients contained in the liquid phase of the foam include inorganic nutrients, such as nitrogen, phosphoru and sulfur, as well as all other elements required for microbial growth on simple carbon sources. In one preferr embodiment, the liquid phase contains no substantial source of carbon. However, the liquid phase of this embodime can contain carbon derived from microbial metabolism as well as carbon-based surfactants and vitamins, which not interfere with degradation of the VOC carbon in the gaseous phase of the foam. In other embodiments, the liqui phase can contain carbon-based co-factors and co-metabolites which do not interfere with degradation of the VO carbon. These cofactors or co-metabolites can aid in the degradation of VOC carbon in the gaseous phase. F instance, methane can be used as a co-metabolite in the degradation of trichloroethylene. The temperature and p are chosen to optimize metabolism of the microbes or microbial consortia. For many VOC-degrading microbes, roo temperature is preferred and pH is preferably maintained in the range of approximately 6.8-7.8. An exemplar medium formulation is presented below in Table I.
Table I Formulation of HCMM2 Minimal Salts Medium
Component Milligrams/Liter Millimoles/Liter
KH2P04 1360 10
Na2HP04 1420 10
KNO3 500 4.99
(NH4)2S04 2380 18
MgS04 *7H20 50 0.200
CaCI2 '2H20 10 0.068
H3B0 2.86 0.046
MnS04 'H20 1.54 0.0091
Fe(NH4)2(S04)"6H20 3.53 0.0090
CuS04 'H20 0.0392 0.000157
ZnCI2 0.0209 0.000153
CoCI2 '6H20 0.0405 0.000170
Na2Mo04 'sH20 0.0252 0.000104
Surfactants are chosen based on biocompatibility with the microorganisms being used. Exemplary surfactants include, but are not limited to, Triton X-100, Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), Nonidet P-40, and silicon- based formulations such as DC- 193. Additionally, in order to avoid inhibiting degradation of the VOCs, the surfactants preferably do not provide the organisms with a metabolizable source of carbon as determined by appropriate bioassays.
VOCs amenable to treatment using the foam include naturally occurring or xenobiotic aromatic and aliphatic compounds with vapor pressures sufficient to allow transport in the vapor phase. Exemplary compounds include gasoline hydrocarbons, trichloroethylene, ethers, and ketones of industrial importance.
In accordance with a second aspect of the present invention, there is provided a bioreactor 10 and method for efficient and cost effective degradation of VOCs from air without the inherent problems of oxygen limitation and biofouling currently associated with conventional fixed-film vapor phase reactors.
Referring to FIGURE 2, the bioreactor 10 preferably includes three basic system components: (a) a foam generator 15; (b) a reaction pipe 20; and (c) a defoamer 25. in a particularly preferred embodiment, the bioreactor 10 also includes a chemostat 30 configured to maintain a preferred physiological state of the biomass.
The foam generator 15 produces foam by combining VOC-containing air with a liquid based nutrient- containing medium, microorganisms and preferably a surfactant. The foam thus produced is similar to that described above in relation to the first aspect of the present invention. Commercially available devices used to generate the foam preferably allow passive introduction of the VOC-containing air, so that additional compressors are not
necessary. The foam generator 15 allows for controlled introduction of the VOC-containing air. For example, t VOC-containing air can be introduced to the low pressure side of a centrifugal or gearhead fluid pump 35 where is mechanically mixed with the liquid by the action of the pump mechanism. The VOC-containing air can also introduced into a venturi mixing device where static mixers produce the emulsion of air and liquid. The reaction pipe 20 is in fluid communication with the foam generator 15. Foam produced by the foa generator 15 is allowed to flow continuously into the reaction pipe 20. The dimensions of the reaction pipe 20 a chosen such that for a given rate of foam generation, the foam's incubation time in the reaction pipe 20 is sufficie to allow for a desired degree of degradation of the VOCs into C02 and other degradation components. The reacti pipe 20 can be oriented a number of ways, including horizontally or vertically. The reaction pipe 20 preferab maintains plug-flow conditions to prevent mixing of the influent and effluent foam.
After incubating in the reaction pipe 20, the foam enters the defoamer 25, which breaks the foam into i fluid and gaseous components. The foam can be disrupted by any of a number of methods well known to tho of skill in the art. Preferably, defoaming does not chemically alter the resulting liquid component. Exempla defoamiπg methods include thermal disruption, such as by heated wire grids or air streams; and mechanical agitatio such as by liquid spray 35 or centrifugal force. The defoamer preferably allows for complete separation of the liqu and gaseous components of the foam emulsion. Defoamed liquid is recovered from the defoamer by any of a numb of well-known means, such as gravity flow, while the gaseous component is allowed to diffuse into the atmospher or into a collection manifold for further processing by one or more serial vapor phase reactors.
The chemostat 30 provides a means for modifying the liquid phase recovered from the defoamer 25. Th chemostat is equipped with sensing devices designed to monitor parameters of physiological significance, such Ph, conductivity, microbe concentration, temperature, surfactant concentration, fluid level, and specific ion a nutrient concentrations. Preferably, the chemostat is connected in series between the defoamer and the foa generator. Defoamed liquid is introduced into the chemostat unit 25, preferably by passive means. After monitorin the parameters can be adjusted automatically or manually to optimize metabolism of the microbes or microbi consortia. Exemplary adjustments include addition of fresh medium/surfactant through a medium addition inlet 4 and removal of excess biomass developed as a result of microbial growth during the process through a bioma removal outlet 45.
Optimal bioreactor physiologic parameters are established either by previous bench experiments or empiricall during reactor start-up. Physiologic parameters are maintained during operation of the bioreactor. For exampl distilled water can be added to make up for evaporative losses, or medium can be added to replace nutrient ion taken up into biomass and fluid lost due to removal of the microbes. However, the liquid phase in the reactor i preferably maintained as closed-loop as possible.
The bioreactor is constructed from nontoxic materials unaffected by either the VOC-degradin microorganisms, or the VOCs being treated. Suitable materials include PVC plastic, epoxy-coated steel, and stainle steel. Gaskets, valves, pipes and other plumbing-related components are chosen to conform to the same requiremen
as the bioreactor, and materials used include PVC, stainless steel, Teflon, Viton, buna rubber, or other VOC-resistant materials.
In the specific embodiment schematically illustrated in FIGURE 2, VOC-contaminated air enters the bioreactor through an air metering valve 50 at the inlet 55 of the foam generating pump. The VOC-contaminated air is combined with liquid containing microbes, nutrients, and surfactant. The resultant combination is pumped by the foam generator pump 35 into a static in-line mixer 60, where the air and liquid are entrained into a semi-stable biologically activated foam. The foam is displaced into the reaction pipe 20. As the foam continues to enter the reaction pipe 20, it is displaced along the length of the reaction pipe while incubating therein. Foam subsequently enters the defoamer 25 where a liquid spray 35 impinges on it, breaking the bubbles and releasing gaseous products such as C02 into an exhaust manifold 62. The recovered liquid phase drains by gravity to the bottom of the defoamer. Some of the recovered liquid is pumped through the spray nozzle of the defoamer by a defoaming pump 65. The majority of the recovered liquid, however, is directed into the chemostat 30 for monitoring. If necessary, the quality of the monitored liquid phase is adjusted to maintain desired physiological parameters by addition of medium or water through the addition inlet 40 or removal of biomass through the removal outlet 45. The chemostat 25 can be configured to activate an addition pump 60 or a removal pump 75 when physiological parameters so require. The liquid phase is then recycled into the foam generator and the foam generation cycle repeated. The foregoing steps can also be performed simultaneously.
Example A reactor was constructed from PVC plastic and operated on the laboratory bench for a period of 74 hours. The reactor had a reaction pipe foam capacity of 1.13 liters, a liquid capacity of 600 milliliters and was operated at air flow rates ranging from 100-150 milliliters per minute. The HCMM2 minimal salts medium described above in Table I was used, and the surfactant was Triton X-100 at 0.03% v/v concentration. This surfactant concentration produced a foam of approximately 70-80% gas volume without substantially inhibiting microbial growth as determined by assays using Pseudomonas putida in R2A medium. VOC-laden air was produced by volatilization of contaminants in a vapor generator consisting of a four-liter glass jar ported into the bioreactor. Selected hydrocarbon contaminants were introduced by use of septum-capped serum bottles pierced with hypodermic needles of varying bores to regulate diffusion of the compounds into the atmosphere in the jar. A mass-flow meter monitored the air flow rate through the vapor generator. Typical vapor phase concentrations of contaminants produced by this procedure ranged from 100-700 micromoles of contaminant carbon per liter of air.
The concentration of VOCs in the reactor influent and effluent was monitored every two hours using an on-line gas chromatograph.
As illustrated in FIGURE 3, the reactor was operated for approximately six hours before a consortium of gasoline-degrading bacteria was added. As further described in Ridgway, et al., 1990, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 56 (11):3565-3575, which is incorporated herein by reference, this consortium was initially obtained from a monitoring well sample at a gasoline contaminated site on the Seal Beach Naval Weapons Station, Seal Beach, California.
Although members of this consortium were not specifically identified, previous studies have shown that gasoli degrading bacteria of the genus Pseυdomonas dominate the site, including Ps. aeruginosa, Ps. putida, Ps. stυtze Ps. flυorescens, Ps. acidovorans, Ps. pickettii, Ps. maltophilia, Ps. alcaligenes, and Ps. cepacia. Other gasolin degrading bacteria included members of the genera Alcaligenes, Norcardia, and Micrococcυs (Ridgway, et al., 199 The consortium was subcultured in HCMM2 minimal salts medium with a mixture of hydrocarbon vapors (includi benzene and toluene) as sole carbon sources, then further maintained on mixed hydrocarbon vapors in the fixed-fil vapor phase bioreactor of Figures 4A and 4B for two years. Bacteria isolated from the resultant microbi community in the reactor were found capable of degrading a wide variety of aliphatic and aromatic compounds sole carbon and energy sources, including both benzene and toluene. Reactor operation continued until approximately 52 hours, at which time a biocide, isothiazoliπone (Nal
2593), was introduced. Data were collected beyond 70 hours. Reactor operating parameters were optimiz manually at the beginning of the experiment, but were not adjusted later (i.e., no on-line chemostat was used).
As illustrated by FIGURE 3, both benzene and toluene were degraded by the consortium present in t biologically activated foam. Degradation was not observed until the addition of bacteria, and then rapidly increas as the biota developed in the reactor. The reactor was able to degrade 41.5 ± 4.84 percent of the benzene load and 49.5 ± 16.8 percent of the toluene loaded under the conditions of the experiment. Addition of the biocide 52 hours led to a rapid deterioration in reactor performance, indicating that degradation was mediated by t microbial population.
FIGURE 4 illustrates the performance of the activated foam reactor of the present invention compared t a conventional fixed-film vapor phase reactor operating under similar conditions. As shown in FIGURE 4, at man sample points the percentage of benzene and toluene degradation by the activated foam reactor of the prese invention was over twice that of a conventional fixed-film vapor phase reactor.
Although this invention has been described in terms of certain embodiments, these embodiments are s forth for illustrative purposes, and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention. It will be apparent to tho skilled in the art that various other modifications can be made to these embodiments without departing from th scope of the invention, which is properly determined upon reference to the following claims.
Claims
1. A method of degrading volatile organic contaminants (VOCs), comprising:
(a) generating a foam by incorporating VOC-containing air into a liquid containing a surfactant, nutrients, and VOC-degrading microorganisms; and (b) degrading the VOCs into C02 and other degradation components through metabolism thereof by said microorganisms.
2. The method of Claim 1, additionally comprising:
(c) breaking the foam into a liquid phase and a gaseous phase, said gaseous phase containing the C02; (d) releasing the gaseous phase; and
(e) recovering the liquid phase.
3. The method of Claim 2, additionally comprising:
(f) treating the liquid phase to maintain a desired level of surfactant, nutrients, and microorganisms; and (g) incorporating VOC-containing air into the treated liquid phase to regenerate the foam.
4. The method of Claim 3, additionally comprising repeating steps (b) through (g) a plurality of times.
5. The method of Claim 3, wherein steps (b) through (g) are performed simultaneously.
6. A bioreactor for degrading volatile organic contaminants (VOCs), comprising: a foam generator which generates a foam from VOC-containing air incorporated into liquid containing a surfactant, nutrients and VOC-degrading microorganisms; a reaction pipe in fluid communication with the foam generator, said foam flowing through said reaction pipe, said foam flowing at a sufficiently slow rate and said reaction pipe having a sufficient length to allow time for the microorganisms to degrade the VOCs into CO- and other degradation components; and a defoamer in fluid communication with said reaction pipe, said defoamer having an effluent port for releasing the C02 derived from the biodegraded VOCs.
7. The bioreactor of Claim 6, further comprising a chemostat connected in series between said defoamer and said foam generator, said chemostat configured to modify the liquid phase recovered from said defoamer so that said liquid phase contains appropriate amounts of surfactant, nutrients, and microorganisms.
8. The bioreactor of Claim 6, wherein the foam generator comprises: a first port for receiving VOC-containing air; a second port for receiving a liquid containing a surfactant, nutrients, and VOC-degrading microorganisms; and a mixer for mechanically combining the VOC-containing air with the liquid to create a biologically activated foam.
9. The bioreactor of Claim 6, wherein the defoamer comprises a liquid sprayer for mechanically disrupting the biologically activated foam.
10. The bioreactor of Claim 7, wherein the chemostat is configured to activate a removal pump w removal of biomass is required to maintain a physiological parameter within a desired range and configured activate an addition pump when addition of medium is required to maintain a physiological parameter within a desi range.
11. The bioreactor of Claim 6, wherein said liquid contains no substantial source of carbon usable a feedstock to said microorganisms.
12. The bioreactor of Claim 11, wherein said liquid contains no substantial source of carbon.
13. The bioreactor of Claim 6, wherein said liquid additionally contains a carbon-based cof actor or metabolite which does not interfere with degradation of VOCs.
14. A foam for degrading volatile organic contaminants (VOCs), said foam comprising: a liquid phase containing nutrients and VOC-degrading microorganisms, said liquid phase containi no substantial source of carbon usable as a feedstock to said microorganisms; and a gaseous phase containing VOCs.
15. The foam of Claim 14, wherein the liquid phase further comprises a surfactant.
16. The foam of Claim 14, wherein said foam is produced by mechanically combining said liquid pha with said gaseous phase.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
AU46903/96A AU4690396A (en) | 1995-02-01 | 1995-12-27 | Biodegradation of volatile organic contaminants from air using biologically activated foam |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US08/382,284 US5714379A (en) | 1995-02-01 | 1995-02-01 | Biodegradation of volatile organic contaminants from air using biologically activated foam |
US08/382,284 | 1995-02-01 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO1996023529A1 true WO1996023529A1 (en) | 1996-08-08 |
Family
ID=23508289
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US1995/016998 WO1996023529A1 (en) | 1995-02-01 | 1995-12-27 | Biodegradation of volatile organic contaminants from air using biologically activated foam |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US5714379A (en) |
AU (1) | AU4690396A (en) |
WO (1) | WO1996023529A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
AU2001296686A1 (en) | 2000-10-06 | 2002-04-15 | Odor Control Systems, Inc. | Lagoon covers providing multi-stage waste treatment |
US6932540B2 (en) * | 2000-10-06 | 2005-08-23 | 3-R Foam, Inc. | Permeable water reservoir covers |
US6403366B1 (en) | 2001-06-15 | 2002-06-11 | U.S. Army Corps Of Engineers As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army | Method and apparatus for treating volatile organic compounds, odors, and biogradable aerosol/particulates in air emissions |
DE10135785B4 (en) * | 2001-07-23 | 2005-11-24 | Sartorius Ag | Cleaning method for a filter testing device, computer program product for carrying out such a method and filter testing device |
FR2831831B1 (en) * | 2001-11-06 | 2004-01-02 | Christophe Montigny | PROCESS FOR THE CONTROL OF THE FOAMING OF FOAM PRODUCED BY THE MIXTURE OF A FOAMING LIQUID AND A GAS, ON LIQUID LOSS PROCESSES |
US6747066B2 (en) | 2002-01-31 | 2004-06-08 | Conocophillips Company | Selective removal of oxygen from syngas |
TWI243555B (en) * | 2003-07-09 | 2005-11-11 | Hon Hai Prec Ind Co Ltd | Apparatus and method of firewall |
US7045554B2 (en) * | 2003-09-03 | 2006-05-16 | Conocophillips Company | Method for improved Fischer-Tropsch catalyst stability and higher stable syngas conversion |
US7128881B2 (en) | 2004-04-30 | 2006-10-31 | Petrik Viktor I | Configurations and methods for water purification |
US7189281B2 (en) * | 2004-08-04 | 2007-03-13 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army | Method and system for treating contaminants and odors in airborne emissions |
WO2008127533A1 (en) * | 2007-04-13 | 2008-10-23 | Freeman Energy Corporation | Biomass cultivation system and corresponding method of operation |
US10981112B2 (en) | 2017-04-26 | 2021-04-20 | Bonno Koers | Filter material, device and method for purifying gases and liquids |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4272375A (en) * | 1979-10-26 | 1981-06-09 | C-I-L Inc. | Long vertical shaft bioreactor of simplified design |
US5021069A (en) * | 1988-10-06 | 1991-06-04 | Whellock John G | Method of effecting a bioreaction |
US5211848A (en) * | 1990-05-07 | 1993-05-18 | Board Of Supervisors Of Louisiana State University Agricultural And Mechanical College | Process for the microbial detoxification of toxic streams |
Family Cites Families (18)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3959127A (en) * | 1973-12-05 | 1976-05-25 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Biodegradation of oil on water surfaces |
US3982998A (en) * | 1974-12-06 | 1976-09-28 | Phillips Petroleum Company | Methanol foam fermentation to single cell protein by microorganisms |
CA1131371A (en) * | 1976-07-16 | 1982-09-07 | James E. Zajic | Foam flotation activated sludge process |
US4226939A (en) * | 1978-02-06 | 1980-10-07 | Phillips Petroleum Company | Treatment of make-up water for use in a fermentation process for growth of yeast cells requiring growth factors |
US4242458A (en) * | 1978-10-25 | 1980-12-30 | Texaco Development Corporation | Biosynthesis of protein by fermentation of methanol obtained from the gasification of coal or residual oil |
DE3312578A1 (en) * | 1983-04-08 | 1984-10-11 | Bayer Ag, 5090 Leverkusen | BIOLOGICALLY ACTIVE COMPOSITION FOR WASTEWATER AND EXHAUST AIR TREATMENT |
US4530905A (en) * | 1984-10-25 | 1985-07-23 | The Dow Chemical Company | Crosslinked gelatin foams |
US5149652A (en) * | 1988-04-14 | 1992-09-22 | Phillips Petroleum Company | Fermentation broth degassification |
US5248395A (en) * | 1989-12-26 | 1993-09-28 | Uop | Process for purifying aqueous media |
US5451320A (en) * | 1990-07-10 | 1995-09-19 | International Environmental Systems, Inc., Usa | Biological process for groundwater and wastewater treatment |
US5198000A (en) * | 1990-09-10 | 1993-03-30 | The University Of Connecticut | Method and apparatus for removing gas phase organic contaminants |
US5240598A (en) * | 1990-09-18 | 1993-08-31 | Board Of Supervisors Of Louisiana State University And Agricultural And Mechanical College | Microbubble generator for the transfer of oxygen to microbial inocula and microbubble generator immobilized cell reactor |
GB9021114D0 (en) * | 1990-09-28 | 1990-11-14 | Alberta Oil Sands Tech | Microbial manipulations of surfactant-containing foams to reduced subterranean formation permeability |
US5248587A (en) * | 1990-10-23 | 1993-09-28 | Eastman Kodak Company | Low temperature growth emulsion making process |
US5190668A (en) * | 1991-09-30 | 1993-03-02 | Chuang Karl T | Method for the removal of volatile organic compounds from water |
US5232596A (en) * | 1991-10-07 | 1993-08-03 | Radian Corporation | Bio-slurry reaction system and process for hazardous waste treatment |
US5266208A (en) * | 1992-05-29 | 1993-11-30 | Braun Intertec Environmental, Inc. | System and method for cleaning water |
US5298164A (en) * | 1992-07-28 | 1994-03-29 | United States Filter Corporation | Emission reduction of organic volatiles from aerobic biological reactors |
-
1995
- 1995-02-01 US US08/382,284 patent/US5714379A/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1995-12-27 AU AU46903/96A patent/AU4690396A/en not_active Abandoned
- 1995-12-27 WO PCT/US1995/016998 patent/WO1996023529A1/en active Application Filing
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4272375A (en) * | 1979-10-26 | 1981-06-09 | C-I-L Inc. | Long vertical shaft bioreactor of simplified design |
US5021069A (en) * | 1988-10-06 | 1991-06-04 | Whellock John G | Method of effecting a bioreaction |
US5211848A (en) * | 1990-05-07 | 1993-05-18 | Board Of Supervisors Of Louisiana State University Agricultural And Mechanical College | Process for the microbial detoxification of toxic streams |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
AU4690396A (en) | 1996-08-21 |
US5714379A (en) | 1998-02-03 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Ergas et al. | Characterization of compost biofiltration system degrading dichloromethane | |
Chaiprapat et al. | Removal of hydrogen sulfide by complete aerobic oxidation in acidic biofiltration | |
Deshusses et al. | Transient‐state behavior of a biofilter removing mixtures of vapors of MEK and MIBK from air | |
Vikromvarasiri et al. | Hydrogen sulfide removal from biogas by biotrickling filter inoculated with Halothiobacillus neapolitanus | |
US5714379A (en) | Biodegradation of volatile organic contaminants from air using biologically activated foam | |
Attaway et al. | Biodegradation of BTEX vapors in a silicone membrane bioreactor system | |
Qi et al. | Treatment of paint spray booth off-gases in a fungal biofilter | |
Kim et al. | Evaluation of trickle-bed air biofilter performance under periodic stressed operating conditions as a function of styrene loading | |
Kim et al. | Degradation of toluene vapor in a hydrophobic polyethylene hollow fiber membrane bioreactor with Pseudomonas putida | |
Sedighi et al. | Cometabolic degradation of ethyl mercaptan by phenol-utilizing Ralstonia eutropha in suspended growth and gas-recycling trickle-bed reactor | |
Quinlan et al. | VOC elimination in a compost biofilter using a previously acclimated bacterial inoculum | |
Lee et al. | Simultaneous biodegradation of toluene and p‐xylene in a novel bioreactor: experimental results and mathematical analysis | |
Kumar et al. | Performance of a composite membrane bioreactor treating toluene vapors: inocula selection, reactor performance and behavior under transient conditions | |
Edwards et al. | Laboratory‐scale evaluation of aerobic fluidized bed reactors for the biotreatment of a synthetic, high‐strength chemical industry waste stream | |
Shahna et al. | Treatment of benzene, toluene and xylene contaminated air in a bioactive foam emulsion reactor | |
Kwon et al. | Benzene biodegradation using the polyurethane biofilter immobilized with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia T3-c | |
Jorio et al. | Treatment of VOCs in biofilters inoculated with fungi and microbial consortium | |
Harding et al. | Bioremediation of toluene‐contaminated air using an external loop airlift bioreactor | |
Shihab et al. | Reducing volatile organic compound emissions using biotrickling filters and bioscrubber systems | |
Hage et al. | Membrane-aerated biofilm reactor for the removal of 1, 2-dichloroethane by Pseudomonas sp. strain DCA1 | |
Nourmohammadi et al. | Absorption and biodegradation of toluene in a two-phase low-pressure bioscrubber using cutting oil as the organic phase | |
Jacome et al. | Simultaneous removal of organic matter and nitrogen compounds in autoaerated biofilms | |
Ying et al. | Successful application of biological activated carbon process for removing sulfolane from groundwater | |
Wu et al. | Long‐term performance of co‐metabolic degradation of trichloroethylene in a fluidized bed reactor fed with benzene, toluene and xylene | |
Hosoglu et al. | Abatement of synthetic landfill gas including limonene by biotrickling filter and membrane biofiltration |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AM AT AU BB BG BR BY CA CH CN CZ DE DK EE ES FI GB GE HU IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LK LR LS LT LU LV MD MG MK MN MW MX NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK TJ TM TT UA UG UZ VN |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): KE LS MW SD SZ UG AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN ML MR NE SN TD TG |
|
DFPE | Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101) | ||
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
REG | Reference to national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: 8642 |
|
122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase |