WO1999024955A1 - Method for transforming message containing sensitive information - Google Patents

Method for transforming message containing sensitive information Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1999024955A1
WO1999024955A1 PCT/US1998/023583 US9823583W WO9924955A1 WO 1999024955 A1 WO1999024955 A1 WO 1999024955A1 US 9823583 W US9823583 W US 9823583W WO 9924955 A1 WO9924955 A1 WO 9924955A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
message
sensitive term
sensitive
sanitized
create
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US1998/023583
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Scott E. Fahlman
Rahul Sukthankar
Antoine Brusseau
Original Assignee
Justsystem Pittsburgh Research Center, Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Justsystem Pittsburgh Research Center, Inc. filed Critical Justsystem Pittsburgh Research Center, Inc.
Priority to AU13826/99A priority Critical patent/AU1382699A/en
Publication of WO1999024955A1 publication Critical patent/WO1999024955A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F21/00Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
    • G06F21/60Protecting data
    • G06F21/62Protecting access to data via a platform, e.g. using keys or access control rules
    • G06F21/6209Protecting access to data via a platform, e.g. using keys or access control rules to a single file or object, e.g. in a secure envelope, encrypted and accessed using a key, or with access control rules appended to the object itself

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method and apparatus for transforming a message containing sensitive information, and more particularly, to a method and apparatus for transforming a message by separating sensitive information from the message prior to an untrusted service, for example, a human-assisted translation service.
  • an untrusted service for example, a human-assisted translation service.
  • An untrusted service is when a human- assisted translation service is required during the transmission process. If an original message is composed in the native language of the sender of the message, the message needs to be translated by a translation service before it can be forwarded to the intended recipient.
  • the conventional encryption techniques will not guarantee the confidentiality of the message under such circumstances.
  • a bilingual human translator is generally employed to translate the message or at least to check and correct the machine translation.
  • the human translator must see the message in its decrypted form. This creates a potential security leak.
  • One option is to chop the message into many small pieces, and employ a different human translator to work on each piece. This is undesirable because the translator needs to see a large enough portion of the message to understand the proper context for the message so that he can provide the high quality translation. This in turn defeats the purpose of chopping the message.
  • the translators are usually subject to non-disclosure agreements, potential risks for sensitive information leaking remain and often are viewed undesirable by business customers .
  • an automated service such as an automatic grammar checker or style checker
  • an automated service may create potential security leak under certain circumstances if the automated service has access to the full content of a message. For example, a substantial portion of the message may show up on a screen during the processing and a bystander may see that portion.
  • the present invention is directed to a method and an apparatus for transforming a message that substantially obviates one or more of the problems due to limitations and disadvantages of the related art .
  • An object of the present invention is to provide a method and an apparatus for transforming a message by separating sensitive information from the message prior to an untrusted service, so that the confidentiality of the information is maintained.
  • the method according to the present invention for transforming an original message into a final message by including an untrusted service includes the steps of identifying at least one sensitive term from the original message; replacing the at least one sensitive term with a standard token to create a sanitized message; storing the at least one sensitive term; transmitting the sanitized message to a provider of the untrusted service; performing the untrusted service on the sanitized message to create a serviced message; merging the serviced message with the at least one sensitive term stored in the storing step to create the final message .
  • the apparatus according to the present invention for transforming an original message created at a source terminal into a final message for delivering to a destination terminal by including an untrusted service includes means at the source terminal for identifying at least one sensitive term from the original message; r.eans at the source terminal for replacing the at least one sensitive term with a standard token to create a sanitized message; means at the source terminal for storing the at least one sensitive term; means for transmitting the sanitized message to a provider of the untrusted service, thereby creating a serviced message; means for transmitting the serviced message from the untrusted service to the destination terminal; means for transmitting the at least one sensitive term stored in the storing step from the source terminal to the destination terminal; and r.eans at the destination terminal for merging the serviced message with the at least one sensitive term to create the final message.
  • the method of the present invention for efficiently transmitting a confidential message includes the steps of preparing an original confidential message; identifying at least one sensitive term from the original confidential message; replacing the at least one sensitive term with a standard token to create a sanitized message; storing the at least one sensitive term; transmitting the sanitized message with a first level of security; transmitting the at least one sensitive term stored in the storing step with a second level of security, the second level of security being more secure than the first level of security; receiving the sanitized message and the at least one sensitive term; and merging the sanitized message with the at least one sensitive term to create, a final confidential message.
  • Fig. 1 is a flow chart illustrating a method for transforming and transmitting a confidential message in accordance with a first embodiment of the present invention
  • Fig. 2 is a flow chart illustrating a method for transforming and transmitting a confidential message in accordance with a second embodiment of the present invention
  • Fig. 3 is an illustration of the identifying sensitive information step of Fig. 2 ;
  • FIG. 4 is an illustration of the replacing sensitive information step of Fig. 2
  • Fig. 5 is an illustration of the merging sensitive information to the serviced message step of Fig. 2;
  • Fig. 6 is an apparatus for transforming a message for transmission from a source terminal to a destination terminal in accordance with the present invention.
  • the first embodiment of the present invention relates to a method for efficiently transmitting a confidential message and is shown in Fig. 1.
  • the method for efficiently transmitting a confidential message includes a first step 101 of preparing an original confidential message by a sender.
  • the sender could prepare a textual message through a keyboard connected to a personal computer, or a voice message through a microphone, or any other suitable types of messages through various appropriate devices .
  • step 103 sensitive terms and their respective locations in the original confidential message, i.e.. those terms containing sensitive information, are identified by a suitable computer program algorithm.
  • programs employing heuristic rules or lexical techniques can be used for this purpose.
  • An algorithm using heuristic rules typically searches for patterns in a text which are likely to indicate the presence of sensitive terms. This includes, but is not limited to, a pattern matching approach looking for capitalized terms, such as proper names, places, etc.
  • An algorithm using lexical techniques generally checks a text against a defined list of sensitive terms, such as known places, known names, dollar ($) signs, etc.
  • step 105 the identified sensitive terms are replaced with standard tokens.
  • the sensitive term "Mr. Johnson” is replaced by the standard token ⁇ person-l>
  • the term "July 1, 1997” is replaced by ⁇ date-l>.
  • a sanitized message including various standard tokens is generated in step 105.
  • the sanitized message is then transmitted with a low level of security since the sanitized message only contain standard tokens, not sensitive information. For example, an untrusted service may be performed to the sanitized message and this reduces the security level. Also, an user may choose not to use an encryption program, or use a low security level encryption program with the sanitized message.
  • the sensitive terms are stripped from the original confidential message.
  • the stripped sensitive terms and their respective locations i.e.. the mapping information, are stored either together with the sanitized message or in a separate location from the sanitized message.
  • the thus stored sensitive terms and the mapping information are transmitted with a high level of security.
  • the sensitive terms received from the second path are merged with the sanitized message to create a final confidential message.
  • the final confidential message is delivered to the intended recipient.
  • the high level of security for transmitting the sensitive terms can be achieved through the use of suitable encryption techniques.
  • the security level is often low since either encryption techniques are not used, or encrypted text has to be decrypted before performing the untrusted service.
  • a human translator is required to translate the sanitized message, the encrypted text has to be decrypted before the human translator can perform the translation.
  • a second embodiment of the present invention relates to a method for transforming a message by separating sensitive information from the message prior to an untrusted service.
  • a sender composes an original message which may include several sensitive terms, i.e.. terms containing sensitive information.
  • the sender can compose the original message by typing on the keyboard of a personal computer to generate a textual message, or by speaking to a microphone to generate a vocal message, or by video-taping a desired object to generate an image message.
  • step 203 sensitive terms are identified from the original message via a suitable computer program algorithm.
  • the sensitive terms are defined as any information which are viewed by the sender as sensitive or confidential.
  • Fig. 3 shows several examples of the sensitive terms: names of people or organizations, a particular transaction, any financial information related to a transaction, dates of transaction, company names, addresses of the parties, project names, gender markers such as "he", >"she” , "Mr.” and "Ms . " , etc .
  • step 205 the identified sensitive terms are replaced with standard tokens, such as ⁇ person-l>, ⁇ date-l>, ⁇ amount-2>. ⁇ address-3>, etc.
  • the sensitive terms and the mapping information are saved in a file.
  • a sanitized message including various tokens is generated.
  • Fig. 4 shows several examples of this operation: the term “Mr. Johnson” may be replaced by ⁇ person-l>, the term “XYZ Corporation” may be replaced by ⁇ company-l>, etc.
  • Step 207 shows an optional review capability by the sender of the original message.
  • Sender can choose to review the sanitized message to decide whether a third party can ascertain the true meaning of the message by reading the sanitized message. If the sender is not satisfied with the sanitized message, he can then replace more terms with tokens, either manually or via a different subroutine. Alternatively, if too many tokens are used, the sender can choose to desanitize the message, i.e.. to lower the security level, thereby improving the performance or efficiency of the process. The sender has the option to repeat the review process several times until he is satisfied with the sanitized message.
  • the steps 201, 203, 205, and 207 are generally performed by using a computer at the sender's location. But they can also be performed at several difference locations.
  • the sanitized message is transmitted in step 209 to an untrusted service for required service, for example, a human-assisted translation service.
  • the transmission step 209 may occur along an electronic link, or by physical delivering of the sanitized message.
  • a printed hard copy of the sanitized message may be physically delivered to a translator.
  • an untrusted service such as a translation service, or a grammar checking or style checking service, is performed to the sanitized message to create a serviced message. This is where the confidentiality of the message gets compromised in the conventional art.
  • the sanitized message does not contain any sensitive information, and only contains standard tokens, the human translator or other recipients of the message are not exposed to any sensitive information. Therefore, there is no compromise of security standards in the present invention.
  • the sensitive terms and the respective mapping information are stored either in a separate location, or together with the sanitized message, in step 213.
  • a trusted service by either an automated service provider or a trusted human operator may be performed in step 215 on the sensitive information. For example, this can be accomplished by an automated translator given that most of the sensicive terms include only simple phrases. Often, no service at all is needed for the sensitive information. For example, numerical numbers, dollar amounts, and dates often do not need translation.
  • step 217 the sensitive terms are automatically merged back into the serviced message to create a final message.
  • each standard token is replaced by the associated sensitive term, e.g., ⁇ person-l> is replaced by "Mr. Johnson", and ⁇ company-l> is replaced by "XYZ Corporation", etc.
  • step 219 the final message is delivered to the intended recipient. During the entire transmission process, only the sender and the intended recipient have the opportunity to view the complete message including all sensitive terms. This assures the confidentiality of the message.
  • the steps 217 and 219 are generally performed by using a computer at the recipient's location. But they can also be performed at different locations.
  • Fig. 6 shows an exemplary embodiment of the apparatus for transforming an original message created at a source terminal into a final message for delivering to a destination terminal by including an untrusted service .
  • a sender generates an original message at a source terminal 301.
  • the source terminal 301 could be a personal computer including an input device such as a keyboard, a central processing unit, a video monitor and a memory device.
  • the source terminal 301 can also be a microphone for generating vocal data, or a video camera for generating image data, or any other appropriate well-known devices for generating different combination of data.
  • the apparatus also include identifying means, which may be either computer program subroutines, or any other appropriate algorithms, for identifying sensitive terms contained in the original message.
  • identifying means may be either computer program subroutines, or any other appropriate algorithms, for identifying sensitive terms contained in the original message.
  • programs employing heuristic rules or lexical techniques may be used for this- purpose .
  • the apparatus also includes replacing means, which could be another subroutine or various combination of algorithms, for replacing the identified sensitive terms with standard tokens, thereby creating a sanitized message.
  • Storing means such as a memory device, a CD Rom, or a diskette, is provided at the source terminal 301 for storing the sensitive terms stripped from the original message and the respective mapping information.
  • the apparatus includes a link for transmitting the sanitized message to a provider of an untrusted service 303, such as a translation service. This creates a service message.
  • the service message is then transmitted through the link to a destination terminal 311 of the apparatus.
  • the sensitive terms stripped from the original message and the respective mapping information may be transmitted from the source terminal 301 to the destination terminal 311 either through the same link as that used by the sanitized message, or through a difference link.
  • a high security level is provided for the transmission of the sensitive terms.
  • encryption techniques can be used to maintain the required high level security.
  • a trusted service for example, a service provided by an automated service provider or a trusted human operator, can be performed on the sensitive terms.
  • the apparatus further includes merging means at the destination terminal for merging the sensitive terms to the serviced message to create a final message .
  • the merging means may be either a computer program subroutine, or other appropriate algorithms.
  • the intended recipient of the message then receives the final message from the destination termination.
  • the destination terminal could be a personal computer including a video monitor, a central processing unit, a keyboard, a memory device such as a CD Rom or diskette or hard memories.
  • the destination terminal may also be a video player which shows image data, or a sound player which plays the voice data.

Abstract

A method for transforming an original message into a final message by including an untrusted service, includes the steps of identifying at least one sensitive term from the original message (103): replacing the at least one sensitive term with a standard token to create a sanitized message (105); storing the at least one sensitive term (109); transmitting the sanitized message to a provider of the untrusted service (107); performing the untrusted service on the sanitized message to create a serviced message (107); merging the serviced message with the at least one sensitive term stored in the storing step to create the final message (111).

Description

METHOD FOR TRANSFORMING MESSAGE CONTAINING SENSITIVE INFORMATION
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a method and apparatus for transforming a message containing sensitive information, and more particularly, to a method and apparatus for transforming a message by separating sensitive information from the message prior to an untrusted service, for example, a human-assisted translation service. Discussion of the Related Art One important issue in the communication field is to keep the confidentiality of information when such information is transmitted from one party at a specific location to another party at a different location. This is especially so when information is transmitted over electronic links. Business customers may not use a communication service unless the confidentiality of their messages can be maintained.
In general, various encryption techniques have been developed to ensure that the confidentiality of information is maintained during transmission. However, if any untrusted services are required during the transmission process, the security level of the communication service is compromised and confidentiality of the information is not guaranteed.
One typical example of an untrusted service is when a human- assisted translation service is required during the transmission process. If an original message is composed in the native language of the sender of the message, the message needs to be translated by a translation service before it can be forwarded to the intended recipient. The conventional encryption techniques will not guarantee the confidentiality of the message under such circumstances.
Since fully automatic translation techniques are not yet available for providing high quality translations from one language to another, a bilingual human translator is generally employed to translate the message or at least to check and correct the machine translation. As a result, the human translator must see the message in its decrypted form. This creates a potential security leak. One option is to chop the message into many small pieces, and employ a different human translator to work on each piece. This is undesirable because the translator needs to see a large enough portion of the message to understand the proper context for the message so that he can provide the high quality translation. This in turn defeats the purpose of chopping the message. Although the translators are usually subject to non-disclosure agreements, potential risks for sensitive information leaking remain and often are viewed undesirable by business customers . In addition, even an automated service, such as an automatic grammar checker or style checker, may create potential security leak under certain circumstances if the automated service has access to the full content of a message. For example, a substantial portion of the message may show up on a screen during the processing and a bystander may see that portion.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION Accordingly, the present invention is directed to a method and an apparatus for transforming a message that substantially obviates one or more of the problems due to limitations and disadvantages of the related art .
An object of the present invention is to provide a method and an apparatus for transforming a message by separating sensitive information from the message prior to an untrusted service, so that the confidentiality of the information is maintained.
Additional features and advantages of the invention will be set forth in the description which follows, and in part will be apparent from the description, or may be learned by practice of the invention. The objectives and other advantages of the invention will be realized and attained by the structure particularly pointed out in the written description and claims hereof as well as the appended drawings.
To achieve these and other advantages and in accordance with the purpose of the invention, as embodied and broadly described, the method according to the present invention for transforming an original message into a final message by including an untrusted service includes the steps of identifying at least one sensitive term from the original message; replacing the at least one sensitive term with a standard token to create a sanitized message; storing the at least one sensitive term; transmitting the sanitized message to a provider of the untrusted service; performing the untrusted service on the sanitized message to create a serviced message; merging the serviced message with the at least one sensitive term stored in the storing step to create the final message .
In another aspect, the apparatus according to the present invention for transforming an original message created at a source terminal into a final message for delivering to a destination terminal by including an untrusted service, includes means at the source terminal for identifying at least one sensitive term from the original message; r.eans at the source terminal for replacing the at least one sensitive term with a standard token to create a sanitized message; means at the source terminal for storing the at least one sensitive term; means for transmitting the sanitized message to a provider of the untrusted service, thereby creating a serviced message; means for transmitting the serviced message from the untrusted service to the destination terminal; means for transmitting the at least one sensitive term stored in the storing step from the source terminal to the destination terminal; and r.eans at the destination terminal for merging the serviced message with the at least one sensitive term to create the final message.
In a further aspect, the method of the present invention for efficiently transmitting a confidential message, includes the steps of preparing an original confidential message; identifying at least one sensitive term from the original confidential message; replacing the at least one sensitive term with a standard token to create a sanitized message; storing the at least one sensitive term; transmitting the sanitized message with a first level of security; transmitting the at least one sensitive term stored in the storing step with a second level of security, the second level of security being more secure than the first level of security; receiving the sanitized message and the at least one sensitive term; and merging the sanitized message with the at least one sensitive term to create, a final confidential message.
It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory and are intended to provide further explanation of the invention as claimed. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The accompanying drawings, which are included to provide a further understanding of the invention and are incorporated in and constitute a part of the specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention and together with the description serve to explain the principles of the invention. In the drawings :
Fig. 1 is a flow chart illustrating a method for transforming and transmitting a confidential message in accordance with a first embodiment of the present invention; Fig. 2 is a flow chart illustrating a method for transforming and transmitting a confidential message in accordance with a second embodiment of the present invention; Fig. 3 is an illustration of the identifying sensitive information step of Fig. 2 ;
Fig. 4 is an illustration of the replacing sensitive information step of Fig. 2; Fig. 5 is an illustration of the merging sensitive information to the serviced message step of Fig. 2; and
Fig. 6 is an apparatus for transforming a message for transmission from a source terminal to a destination terminal in accordance with the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Reference will now be made in detail to the preferred embodiments of the present invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings.
The first embodiment of the present invention relates to a method for efficiently transmitting a confidential message and is shown in Fig. 1.
Referring to Fig. 1, the method for efficiently transmitting a confidential message includes a first step 101 of preparing an original confidential message by a sender. For example, the sender could prepare a textual message through a keyboard connected to a personal computer, or a voice message through a microphone, or any other suitable types of messages through various appropriate devices .
Next, as shown in step 103, sensitive terms and their respective locations in the original confidential message, i.e.. those terms containing sensitive information, are identified by a suitable computer program algorithm. For example, programs employing heuristic rules or lexical techniques can be used for this purpose. An algorithm using heuristic rules typically searches for patterns in a text which are likely to indicate the presence of sensitive terms. This includes, but is not limited to, a pattern matching approach looking for capitalized terms, such as proper names, places, etc. An algorithm using lexical techniques generally checks a text against a defined list of sensitive terms, such as known places, known names, dollar ($) signs, etc.
In step 105, the identified sensitive terms are replaced with standard tokens. For example, the sensitive term "Mr. Johnson" is replaced by the standard token <person-l>, and the term "July 1, 1997" is replaced by <date-l>. As a result, a sanitized message including various standard tokens is generated in step 105. The sanitized message is then transmitted with a low level of security since the sanitized message only contain standard tokens, not sensitive information. For example, an untrusted service may be performed to the sanitized message and this reduces the security level. Also, an user may choose not to use an encryption program, or use a low security level encryption program with the sanitized message.
The sensitive terms are stripped from the original confidential message. The stripped sensitive terms and their respective locations, i.e.. the mapping information, are stored either together with the sanitized message or in a separate location from the sanitized message. In step 109, the thus stored sensitive terms and the mapping information are transmitted with a high level of security. Then, in step 111, the sensitive terms received from the second path are merged with the sanitized message to create a final confidential message.
Finally, in step 113, the final confidential message is delivered to the intended recipient. The high level of security for transmitting the sensitive terms can be achieved through the use of suitable encryption techniques. In contrast, when an untrusted service is needed for the sanitized message, the security level is often low since either encryption techniques are not used, or encrypted text has to be decrypted before performing the untrusted service. For example, when a human translator is required to translate the sanitized message, the encrypted text has to be decrypted before the human translator can perform the translation.
Referring to Fig. 2, a second embodiment of the present invention relates to a method for transforming a message by separating sensitive information from the message prior to an untrusted service.
Initially, in step 201, a sender composes an original message which may include several sensitive terms, i.e.. terms containing sensitive information. The sender can compose the original message by typing on the keyboard of a personal computer to generate a textual message, or by speaking to a microphone to generate a vocal message, or by video-taping a desired object to generate an image message.
In step 203, sensitive terms are identified from the original message via a suitable computer program algorithm. Here, the sensitive terms are defined as any information which are viewed by the sender as sensitive or confidential. For illustrative purpose, Fig. 3 shows several examples of the sensitive terms: names of people or organizations, a particular transaction, any financial information related to a transaction, dates of transaction, company names, addresses of the parties, project names, gender markers such as "he", >"she" , "Mr." and "Ms . " , etc .
In step 205, the identified sensitive terms are replaced with standard tokens, such as <person-l>, <date-l>, <amount-2>. <address-3>, etc. In addition, the sensitive terms and the mapping information are saved in a file. As a result, a sanitized message including various tokens is generated. For illustrative purpose, Fig. 4 shows several examples of this operation: the term "Mr. Johnson" may be replaced by <person-l>, the term "XYZ Corporation" may be replaced by <company-l>, etc. Step 207 shows an optional review capability by the sender of the original message. Sender can choose to review the sanitized message to decide whether a third party can ascertain the true meaning of the message by reading the sanitized message. If the sender is not satisfied with the sanitized message, he can then replace more terms with tokens, either manually or via a different subroutine. Alternatively, if too many tokens are used, the sender can choose to desanitize the message, i.e.. to lower the security level, thereby improving the performance or efficiency of the process. The sender has the option to repeat the review process several times until he is satisfied with the sanitized message.
The steps 201, 203, 205, and 207 are generally performed by using a computer at the sender's location. But they can also be performed at several difference locations.
Once the sender is satisfied with the security level of the sanitized message, the sanitized message is transmitted in step 209 to an untrusted service for required service, for example, a human-assisted translation service. The transmission step 209 may occur along an electronic link, or by physical delivering of the sanitized message. For example, a printed hard copy of the sanitized message may be physically delivered to a translator. In step 211, an untrusted service, such as a translation service, or a grammar checking or style checking service, is performed to the sanitized message to create a serviced message. This is where the confidentiality of the message gets compromised in the conventional art. However, since the sanitized message does not contain any sensitive information, and only contains standard tokens, the human translator or other recipients of the message are not exposed to any sensitive information. Therefore, there is no compromise of security standards in the present invention.
After the sensitive terms are stripped from the original message in, step 205, the sensitive terms and the respective mapping information are stored either in a separate location, or together with the sanitized message, in step 213. If desired, a trusted service by either an automated service provider or a trusted human operator may be performed in step 215 on the sensitive information. For example, this can be accomplished by an automated translator given that most of the sensicive terms include only simple phrases. Often, no service at all is needed for the sensitive information. For example, numerical numbers, dollar amounts, and dates often do not need translation.
Then, in step 217, the sensitive terms are automatically merged back into the serviced message to create a final message. In other words, as shown in Fig. 5, each standard token is replaced by the associated sensitive term, e.g., <person-l> is replaced by "Mr. Johnson", and <company-l> is replaced by "XYZ Corporation", etc. Finally, in step 219, the final message is delivered to the intended recipient. During the entire transmission process, only the sender and the intended recipient have the opportunity to view the complete message including all sensitive terms. This assures the confidentiality of the message.
The steps 217 and 219 are generally performed by using a computer at the recipient's location. But they can also be performed at different locations.
A fictional example will now be described here showing a confidential message in its original form and in its sanitized form. The sanitized message created by step 205 and viewed by the translator goes as the following: From: <person-l>
<company-l>
<address-l>
To: <person-2>
<company-2> <address-2>
Dear. <person-2>,
I have interviewed <person-3> and believe that we should hire him at an annual salary of <dollars-l> commencing on <date-l>. He is, after all, the world's leading expert on <quoted-string-l> . His current employer, <company-3>, will not like this and may threaten to sue. But we have learned that they will soon be the subject of an anti-trust complaint filed by <company-4>, so their legal staff will have more important things to worry about . Sincerely, <person-l>
From this sanitized message, the translator is not able to figure out the parties involved in this communication. Thus, the confidentiality of the original message, which goes as the follows, is maintained: From: A. Johnson
XYZ Corporation Seattle, WA To : B . Smith ABC Firm Washington, DC
Dear. Mr. Smith,
I have interviewed Mr. C. Williams and believe that we should hire him at an annual salary of $80,000 commencing on July 7, 1997. He is, after all, the world's leading expert on fluid dynamics. His current employer, SSS Corporation, will not like this and may threaten to sue . But we have learned that they will soon be the subject of an anti-trust complaint filed -by
TTT Corporation, so their legal staff will have more important things to worry about.
Sincerely, A. Johnson
Fig. 6 shows an exemplary embodiment of the apparatus for transforming an original message created at a source terminal into a final message for delivering to a destination terminal by including an untrusted service . As shown in Fig. 6, a sender generates an original message at a source terminal 301. The source terminal 301 could be a personal computer including an input device such as a keyboard, a central processing unit, a video monitor and a memory device. The source terminal 301 can also be a microphone for generating vocal data, or a video camera for generating image data, or any other appropriate well-known devices for generating different combination of data.
The apparatus also include identifying means, which may be either computer program subroutines, or any other appropriate algorithms, for identifying sensitive terms contained in the original message. As mentioned earlier, programs employing heuristic rules or lexical techniques may be used for this- purpose .
The apparatus also includes replacing means, which could be another subroutine or various combination of algorithms, for replacing the identified sensitive terms with standard tokens, thereby creating a sanitized message.
Storing means, such as a memory device, a CD Rom, or a diskette, is provided at the source terminal 301 for storing the sensitive terms stripped from the original message and the respective mapping information.
The apparatus includes a link for transmitting the sanitized message to a provider of an untrusted service 303, such as a translation service. This creates a service message. The service message is then transmitted through the link to a destination terminal 311 of the apparatus. The sensitive terms stripped from the original message and the respective mapping information may be transmitted from the source terminal 301 to the destination terminal 311 either through the same link as that used by the sanitized message, or through a difference link. In general, a high security level is provided for the transmission of the sensitive terms. As an option, encryption techniques can be used to maintain the required high level security. As another option, a trusted service, for example, a service provided by an automated service provider or a trusted human operator, can be performed on the sensitive terms. Since no untrusted service is involved with respect to the processing of the sensitive terms, the high level of security is maintained. The apparatus further includes merging means at the destination terminal for merging the sensitive terms to the serviced message to create a final message . The merging means may be either a computer program subroutine, or other appropriate algorithms. The intended recipient of the message then receives the final message from the destination termination. Similar to the source terminal, the destination terminal could be a personal computer including a video monitor, a central processing unit, a keyboard, a memory device such as a CD Rom or diskette or hard memories. The destination terminal may also be a video player which shows image data, or a sound player which plays the voice data.
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made in the method and apparatus of transforming a message of the present invention without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. Thus, it is intended that the present invention cover the modifications and variations of this invention provided they come within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents .

Claims

What is claimed is:
1. A method for transforming an original message into a final message by including an untrusted service, the method comprising the steps of: identifying at least one sensitive term from the original message;
replacing the at least one sensitive term with a standard token to create a sanitized message; storing the at least one sensitive term; transmitting the sanitized message to a provider of the untrusted service; performing the untrusted service on the sanitized message to create a serviced message; merging the serviced message with the at least one sensitive term stored in the storing step to create the final message.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the identifying step includes identifying at least one of an address, a number, a time, a date, and a name.
uAoiA/u64oo.╬╣ 20a
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the identifying step includes identifying a plurality of classes of sensitive terms, and the replacing step includes replacing each of the plurality of classes of sensitive terms with an unique token.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the storing step includes storing the at least one sensitive term into a memory device.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein the transmitting step includes transmitting the sanitized message electronically.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein the performing step includes translating the sanitized message from a first language to a second language to create the serviced message.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein the performing step includes checking grammars of the sanitized message to create the serviced message.
21
8. The method of claim 1, wherein the performing step includes checking styles of the sanitized message to create the serviced message.
9. The method of claim 1, wherein the merging step includes the steps of : identifying the standard token; matching the standard token with the at least one sensitive term stored in the storing step; replacing the standard token with the at least one sensitive term to create the final message.
10. The method of claim 1, wherein the merging step includes the steps of : performing a trusted service on the at least one sensitive term stored in the storing step to create a serviced at least one sensitive term; and inserting the serviced at least one sensitive term to the serviced message to create the final message.
22
11. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of sending the sanitized message to a sender of the original message for reviewing.
12. The method of claim 1, wherein the original message includes textual data.
13. The method of claim 1, wherein the original message includes voice data.
14. The method of claim 1, wherein the original message includes image data.
15. An apparatus for transforming an original message created at a source terminal into a final message for delivering to a destination terminal by including an untrusted service, comprising: means at the source terminal for identifying at least one sensitive term from the original message; means at the source terminal for replacing the at least one sensitive term with a standard token to create a sanitized message;
23 means at the source terminal for storing the at least one sensitive term; means for transmitting the sanitized message to a provider of the untrusted service, thereby creating a serviced message; means for transmitting the serviced message from the untrusted service to the destination terminal; means for transmitting the at least one sensitive term stored in the storing step from the source terminal to the destination terminal; and means at the destination terminal for merging the serviced message with the at least one sensitive term to create the final message.
16. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein the means for storing the at least one sensitive term include a memory device .
17. The apparatus of claim 15 , wherein the means for transmitting the sanitized message to a provider of the untrusted service includes an electronic link.
18. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein the means for transmitting the serviced message from the provider of the
24 untrusted service to the destination terminal includes an - electronic link.
19. The apparatus of claim 15, whe ein the means for transmitting the at least one sensitive term from the source terminal to the destination terminal includes an electronic link.
20. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein the means for transmitting the at least one sensitive term from the source terminal to the destination terminal includes: means for encrypting the at least one sensitive term stored in the storing step with a key to create an encrypted at least one sensitive term; and means for decrypting the encrypted at least one sensitive term with the key.
21. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein the means for transmitting the at least one sensitive term from the source terminal to the destination terminal includes a trusted service provider .
25
22. The apparatus of claim 15, further including a device at the source terminal for generating textual data.
.
23. The apparatus of claim 15, further including a microphone at the source terminal for generating voice data.
24. The apparatus of claim 15, further including a video camera at the source terminal for generating image data.
25. A method for efficiently transmitting a confidential message, comprising the steps of: preparing an original confidential message; identifying at least one sensitive term from the original confidential message; replacing the at least one sensitive term with a standard token to create a sanitized message; storing the at least one sensitive term; transmitting the sanitized message with a first level of security; transmitting the at least one sensitive term stored in the storing step with a second level of security, the second level of security being more secure than the first level of security;
26 receiving the sanitized message and the at least one sensitive term; and merging the sanitized message with the at least one sensitive term to create a final confidential message.
27
PCT/US1998/023583 1997-11-07 1998-11-05 Method for transforming message containing sensitive information WO1999024955A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU13826/99A AU1382699A (en) 1997-11-07 1998-11-05 Method for transforming message containing sensitive information

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US08/966,411 US5960080A (en) 1997-11-07 1997-11-07 Method for transforming message containing sensitive information
US08/966,411 1997-11-07

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1999024955A1 true WO1999024955A1 (en) 1999-05-20

Family

ID=25511362

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US1998/023583 WO1999024955A1 (en) 1997-11-07 1998-11-05 Method for transforming message containing sensitive information

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (1) US5960080A (en)
AU (1) AU1382699A (en)
WO (1) WO1999024955A1 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1412868A1 (en) * 2001-07-27 2004-04-28 Digital Doors, Inc. Computer software product for data security of sensitive words characters or icons
US7546352B1 (en) 2008-08-15 2009-06-09 International Business Machines Corporation Method to automatically merge e-mail replies
US11610582B2 (en) * 2020-03-26 2023-03-21 Paypal, Inc. Systems and methods for formatting informal utterances

Families Citing this family (118)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6678822B1 (en) * 1997-09-25 2004-01-13 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for securely transporting an information container from a trusted environment to an unrestricted environment
US6782510B1 (en) 1998-01-27 2004-08-24 John N. Gross Word checking tool for controlling the language content in documents using dictionaries with modifyable status fields
US6442607B1 (en) * 1998-08-06 2002-08-27 Intel Corporation Controlling data transmissions from a computer
US7293175B2 (en) * 2000-06-29 2007-11-06 Lockheed Martin Corporation Automatic information sanitizer
US7080257B1 (en) 2000-03-27 2006-07-18 Microsoft Corporation Protecting digital goods using oblivious checking
US7054443B1 (en) * 2000-03-27 2006-05-30 Microsoft Corporation System and method for protecting digital goods using random and automatic code obfuscation
US8972590B2 (en) * 2000-09-14 2015-03-03 Kirsten Aldrich Highly accurate security and filtering software
US7313825B2 (en) 2000-11-13 2007-12-25 Digital Doors, Inc. Data security system and method for portable device
US7349987B2 (en) * 2000-11-13 2008-03-25 Digital Doors, Inc. Data security system and method with parsing and dispersion techniques
US9311499B2 (en) * 2000-11-13 2016-04-12 Ron M. Redlich Data security system and with territorial, geographic and triggering event protocol
US7546334B2 (en) * 2000-11-13 2009-06-09 Digital Doors, Inc. Data security system and method with adaptive filter
US7146644B2 (en) * 2000-11-13 2006-12-05 Digital Doors, Inc. Data security system and method responsive to electronic attacks
US8677505B2 (en) * 2000-11-13 2014-03-18 Digital Doors, Inc. Security system with extraction, reconstruction and secure recovery and storage of data
US7322047B2 (en) * 2000-11-13 2008-01-22 Digital Doors, Inc. Data security system and method associated with data mining
US7103915B2 (en) * 2000-11-13 2006-09-05 Digital Doors, Inc. Data security system and method
US7140044B2 (en) * 2000-11-13 2006-11-21 Digital Doors, Inc. Data security system and method for separation of user communities
US7669051B2 (en) * 2000-11-13 2010-02-23 DigitalDoors, Inc. Data security system and method with multiple independent levels of security
US8176563B2 (en) * 2000-11-13 2012-05-08 DigitalDoors, Inc. Data security system and method with editor
JP2002222145A (en) * 2001-01-26 2002-08-09 Fujitsu Ltd Method of transmitting electronic mail, computer program, and recording medium
US7039700B2 (en) 2001-04-04 2006-05-02 Chatguard.Com System and method for monitoring and analyzing communications
US20030033294A1 (en) * 2001-04-13 2003-02-13 Walker Jay S. Method and apparatus for marketing supplemental information
US20060253784A1 (en) * 2001-05-03 2006-11-09 Bower James M Multi-tiered safety control system and methods for online communities
US7313824B1 (en) 2001-07-13 2007-12-25 Liquid Machines, Inc. Method for protecting digital content from unauthorized use by automatically and dynamically integrating a content-protection agent
US20080300856A1 (en) * 2001-09-21 2008-12-04 Talkflow Systems, Llc System and method for structuring information
US7509303B1 (en) * 2001-09-28 2009-03-24 Oracle International Corporation Information retrieval system using attribute normalization
US7475242B2 (en) * 2001-12-18 2009-01-06 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Controlling the distribution of information
US20030145017A1 (en) * 2002-01-31 2003-07-31 Patton Thadd Clark Method and application for removing material from documents for external sources
US7685073B2 (en) * 2002-07-30 2010-03-23 Baker Paul L Methods for negotiating agreement over concealed terms through a blind agent
US8041719B2 (en) 2003-05-06 2011-10-18 Symantec Corporation Personal computing device-based mechanism to detect preselected data
US7673344B1 (en) * 2002-09-18 2010-03-02 Symantec Corporation Mechanism to search information content for preselected data
US8661498B2 (en) * 2002-09-18 2014-02-25 Symantec Corporation Secure and scalable detection of preselected data embedded in electronically transmitted messages
US7886359B2 (en) * 2002-09-18 2011-02-08 Symantec Corporation Method and apparatus to report policy violations in messages
US8225371B2 (en) 2002-09-18 2012-07-17 Symantec Corporation Method and apparatus for creating an information security policy based on a pre-configured template
US7472114B1 (en) 2002-09-18 2008-12-30 Symantec Corporation Method and apparatus to define the scope of a search for information from a tabular data source
US8533840B2 (en) * 2003-03-25 2013-09-10 DigitalDoors, Inc. Method and system of quantifying risk
US7739493B2 (en) * 2003-05-08 2010-06-15 Panasonic Electric Works Co., Ltd. Systems and methods for facilitating secure remote access to sensitive data from an embedded device
AU2003229234A1 (en) * 2003-05-30 2005-01-21 Privasphere Gmbh System and method for secure communication
US20050010764A1 (en) * 2003-06-26 2005-01-13 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for securely transmitting, and improving the transmission of, tag based protocol files containing proprietary information
WO2005031523A2 (en) 2003-09-23 2005-04-07 Lockheed Martin Corporation Systems and methods for sharing data between entities
US7610557B2 (en) * 2003-10-09 2009-10-27 Thunderhead Limited Automatic response interface
GB0323625D0 (en) * 2003-10-09 2003-11-12 Thunderhead Ltd Method and system for automatic modifiable messages
US20050078658A1 (en) * 2003-10-09 2005-04-14 Mclennan James Automatic communication method and system
US7584092B2 (en) 2004-11-15 2009-09-01 Microsoft Corporation Unsupervised learning of paraphrase/translation alternations and selective application thereof
US7412385B2 (en) * 2003-11-12 2008-08-12 Microsoft Corporation System for identifying paraphrases using machine translation
US20050243978A1 (en) * 2004-04-14 2005-11-03 Lg Electronics Inc. System and method of interworking messages between mobile communication terminals
US7185026B2 (en) * 2004-04-15 2007-02-27 International Business Machines Corporation Method for synchronizing read/unread data during LOTUS NOTES database migration
US20050278333A1 (en) * 2004-05-26 2005-12-15 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for managing privacy preferences
US20060005017A1 (en) * 2004-06-22 2006-01-05 Black Alistair D Method and apparatus for recognition and real time encryption of sensitive terms in documents
US20060069728A1 (en) * 2004-08-31 2006-03-30 Motorola, Inc. System and process for transforming a style of a message
US7607006B2 (en) * 2004-09-23 2009-10-20 International Business Machines Corporation Method for asymmetric security
US20080209572A1 (en) * 2004-11-12 2008-08-28 Justsystems Corporation Data Processing System, Data Processing Method, and Management Server
JPWO2006051966A1 (en) * 2004-11-12 2008-05-29 株式会社ジャストシステム Document management apparatus and document management method
US7546235B2 (en) * 2004-11-15 2009-06-09 Microsoft Corporation Unsupervised learning of paraphrase/translation alternations and selective application thereof
US8011003B2 (en) * 2005-02-14 2011-08-30 Symantec Corporation Method and apparatus for handling messages containing pre-selected data
US20060184549A1 (en) * 2005-02-14 2006-08-17 Rowney Kevin T Method and apparatus for modifying messages based on the presence of pre-selected data
JP4419871B2 (en) * 2005-03-02 2010-02-24 富士ゼロックス株式会社 Translation request apparatus and program
US20060282884A1 (en) * 2005-06-09 2006-12-14 Ori Pomerantz Method and apparatus for using a proxy to manage confidential information
US20060288207A1 (en) * 2005-06-17 2006-12-21 Research In Motion Limited Encoding messages for use in a communication system based on classificaiton status
US7908132B2 (en) * 2005-09-29 2011-03-15 Microsoft Corporation Writing assistance using machine translation techniques
US8272064B2 (en) * 2005-11-16 2012-09-18 The Boeing Company Automated rule generation for a secure downgrader
US7890768B2 (en) * 2005-11-30 2011-02-15 Scenera Technologies, Llc Methods, systems, and computer program products for entering sensitive and padding data using user-defined criteria
JP4181577B2 (en) * 2005-12-22 2008-11-19 インターナショナル・ビジネス・マシーンズ・コーポレーション Character string processing method, apparatus, and program
US8561127B1 (en) * 2006-03-01 2013-10-15 Adobe Systems Incorporated Classification of security sensitive information and application of customizable security policies
US7853882B2 (en) * 2006-04-11 2010-12-14 International Business Machines Corporation Portlets having different portlet specific enablement states
US8041127B2 (en) * 2006-11-30 2011-10-18 Intuit Inc. Method and system for obscuring and securing financial data in an online banking application
US8423565B2 (en) 2006-12-21 2013-04-16 Digital Doors, Inc. Information life cycle search engine and method
US8655939B2 (en) * 2007-01-05 2014-02-18 Digital Doors, Inc. Electromagnetic pulse (EMP) hardened information infrastructure with extractor, cloud dispersal, secure storage, content analysis and classification and method therefor
US9015301B2 (en) 2007-01-05 2015-04-21 Digital Doors, Inc. Information infrastructure management tools with extractor, secure storage, content analysis and classification and method therefor
US8468244B2 (en) * 2007-01-05 2013-06-18 Digital Doors, Inc. Digital information infrastructure and method for security designated data and with granular data stores
US20080201158A1 (en) 2007-02-15 2008-08-21 Johnson Mark D System and method for visitation management in a controlled-access environment
US8542802B2 (en) 2007-02-15 2013-09-24 Global Tel*Link Corporation System and method for three-way call detection
US20090135444A1 (en) * 2007-11-26 2009-05-28 Steven Francis Best Method to protect sensitive data fields stored in electronic documents
US20090144619A1 (en) * 2007-12-03 2009-06-04 Steven Francis Best Method to protect sensitive data fields stored in electronic documents
US9201870B2 (en) * 2008-01-25 2015-12-01 First Data Corporation Method and system for providing translated dynamic web page content
US20090216678A1 (en) * 2008-02-25 2009-08-27 Research In Motion Limited System and method for facilitating secure communication of messages associated with a project
US7996374B1 (en) 2008-03-28 2011-08-09 Symantec Corporation Method and apparatus for automatically correlating related incidents of policy violations
US7996373B1 (en) 2008-03-28 2011-08-09 Symantec Corporation Method and apparatus for detecting policy violations in a data repository having an arbitrary data schema
US8065739B1 (en) 2008-03-28 2011-11-22 Symantec Corporation Detecting policy violations in information content containing data in a character-based language
US10169598B1 (en) 2008-04-10 2019-01-01 United Services Automobile Association Systems and methods for sending and receiving encrypted submessages
GB0807296D0 (en) * 2008-04-22 2008-05-28 Thunderhead Ltd Template author and method of driving data capture in document templates
US20100186091A1 (en) * 2008-05-13 2010-07-22 James Luke Turner Methods to dynamically establish overall national security or sensitivity classification for information contained in electronic documents; to provide control for electronic document/information access and cross domain document movement; to establish virtual security perimeters within or among computer networks for electronic documents/information; to enforce physical security perimeters for electronic documents between or among networks by means of a perimeter breach alert system
US8826443B1 (en) 2008-09-18 2014-09-02 Symantec Corporation Selective removal of protected content from web requests sent to an interactive website
US8613040B2 (en) * 2008-12-22 2013-12-17 Symantec Corporation Adaptive data loss prevention policies
US8978091B2 (en) 2009-01-20 2015-03-10 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Protecting content from third party using client-side security protection
US8630726B2 (en) * 2009-02-12 2014-01-14 Value-Added Communications, Inc. System and method for detecting three-way call circumvention attempts
US9225838B2 (en) 2009-02-12 2015-12-29 Value-Added Communications, Inc. System and method for detecting three-way call circumvention attempts
JP4958120B2 (en) * 2009-02-24 2012-06-20 インターナショナル・ビジネス・マシーンズ・コーポレーション Support device, support program, and support method
US8521821B2 (en) * 2009-03-17 2013-08-27 Brigham Young University Encrypted email based upon trusted overlays
US8935752B1 (en) 2009-03-23 2015-01-13 Symantec Corporation System and method for identity consolidation
US10169599B2 (en) * 2009-08-26 2019-01-01 International Business Machines Corporation Data access control with flexible data disclosure
US9224007B2 (en) 2009-09-15 2015-12-29 International Business Machines Corporation Search engine with privacy protection
US9600134B2 (en) 2009-12-29 2017-03-21 International Business Machines Corporation Selecting portions of computer-accessible documents for post-selection processing
CA2735059A1 (en) * 2010-03-25 2011-09-25 Rl Solutions Systems and methods for redacting sensitive data entries
US9773130B2 (en) 2010-05-12 2017-09-26 Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation Embedded guard-sanitizer
US9002696B2 (en) * 2010-11-30 2015-04-07 International Business Machines Corporation Data security system for natural language translation
US8898776B2 (en) 2010-12-28 2014-11-25 Microsoft Corporation Automatic context-sensitive sanitization
WO2013011730A1 (en) * 2011-07-21 2013-01-24 インターナショナル・ビジネス・マシーンズ・コーポレーション Device and method for processing document
US8666919B2 (en) 2011-07-29 2014-03-04 Accenture Global Services Limited Data quality management for profiling, linking, cleansing and migrating data
US9141606B2 (en) * 2012-03-29 2015-09-22 Lionbridge Technologies, Inc. Methods and systems for multi-engine machine translation
US20140122988A1 (en) * 2012-10-30 2014-05-01 FHOOSH, Inc. Systems and methods for populating user information on electronic forms
US9892278B2 (en) 2012-11-14 2018-02-13 International Business Machines Corporation Focused personal identifying information redaction
ES2734058T3 (en) * 2015-12-30 2019-12-04 Legalxtract Aps A method and system to provide a document extract
US10572961B2 (en) 2016-03-15 2020-02-25 Global Tel*Link Corporation Detection and prevention of inmate to inmate message relay
US9609121B1 (en) 2016-04-07 2017-03-28 Global Tel*Link Corporation System and method for third party monitoring of voice and video calls
WO2017214212A1 (en) 2016-06-08 2017-12-14 Open Invention Network Llc Dynamic outgoing message modification
US10223356B1 (en) * 2016-09-28 2019-03-05 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Abstraction of syntax in localization through pre-rendering
US10229113B1 (en) 2016-09-28 2019-03-12 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Leveraging content dimensions during the translation of human-readable languages
US10235362B1 (en) 2016-09-28 2019-03-19 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Continuous translation refinement with automated delivery of re-translated content
US10275459B1 (en) 2016-09-28 2019-04-30 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Source language content scoring for localizability
US10261995B1 (en) 2016-09-28 2019-04-16 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Semantic and natural language processing for content categorization and routing
US11496286B2 (en) * 2017-01-08 2022-11-08 Apple Inc. Differential privacy with cloud data
US10027797B1 (en) 2017-05-10 2018-07-17 Global Tel*Link Corporation Alarm control for inmate call monitoring
US10225396B2 (en) 2017-05-18 2019-03-05 Global Tel*Link Corporation Third party monitoring of a activity within a monitoring platform
US10860786B2 (en) 2017-06-01 2020-12-08 Global Tel*Link Corporation System and method for analyzing and investigating communication data from a controlled environment
US9930088B1 (en) 2017-06-22 2018-03-27 Global Tel*Link Corporation Utilizing VoIP codec negotiation during a controlled environment call
JP2019066917A (en) * 2017-09-28 2019-04-25 京セラドキュメントソリューションズ株式会社 Electronic device and translation support method
US11461495B2 (en) * 2019-11-24 2022-10-04 International Business Machines Corporation Cognitive screening of attachments
EP3955536A1 (en) * 2020-08-10 2022-02-16 S.C. Citydock Srl System and method for protecting confidential data in electronic correspondence

Citations (20)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4580218A (en) * 1983-09-08 1986-04-01 At&T Bell Laboratories Indexing subject-locating method
US4991094A (en) * 1989-04-26 1991-02-05 International Business Machines Corporation Method for language-independent text tokenization using a character categorization
US5005127A (en) * 1987-10-26 1991-04-02 Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha System including means to translate only selected portions of an input sentence and means to translate selected portions according to distinct rules
US5276616A (en) * 1989-10-16 1994-01-04 Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha Apparatus for automatically generating index
US5423032A (en) * 1991-10-31 1995-06-06 International Business Machines Corporation Method for extracting multi-word technical terms from text
US5471611A (en) * 1991-03-13 1995-11-28 University Of Strathclyde Computerised information-retrieval database systems
US5500796A (en) * 1993-07-22 1996-03-19 General Electric Company Method for extracting open-issue data from textual specifications using natural language text processing
US5523946A (en) * 1992-02-11 1996-06-04 Xerox Corporation Compact encoding of multi-lingual translation dictionaries
US5577209A (en) * 1991-07-11 1996-11-19 Itt Corporation Apparatus and method for providing multi-level security for communication among computers and terminals on a network
US5625773A (en) * 1989-04-05 1997-04-29 Xerox Corporation Method of encoding and line breaking text
US5692124A (en) * 1996-08-30 1997-11-25 Itt Industries, Inc. Support of limited write downs through trustworthy predictions in multilevel security of computer network communications
US5721939A (en) * 1995-08-03 1998-02-24 Xerox Corporation Method and apparatus for tokenizing text
US5765176A (en) * 1996-09-06 1998-06-09 Xerox Corporation Performing document image management tasks using an iconic image having embedded encoded information
US5796948A (en) * 1996-11-12 1998-08-18 Cohen; Elliot D. Offensive message interceptor for computers
US5799268A (en) * 1994-09-28 1998-08-25 Apple Computer, Inc. Method for extracting knowledge from online documentation and creating a glossary, index, help database or the like
US5819265A (en) * 1996-07-12 1998-10-06 International Business Machines Corporation Processing names in a text
US5822435A (en) * 1992-07-10 1998-10-13 Secure Computing Corporation Trusted path subsystem for workstations
US5828832A (en) * 1996-07-30 1998-10-27 Itt Industries, Inc. Mixed enclave operation in a computer network with multi-level network security
US5832227A (en) * 1992-12-14 1998-11-03 The Commonwealth Of Australia Of Anzak Park Method for providing message document security by deleting predetermined header portions and attaching predetermined header portions when seal is validly associated with message or document
US5848386A (en) * 1996-05-28 1998-12-08 Ricoh Company, Ltd. Method and system for translating documents using different translation resources for different portions of the documents

Family Cites Families (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2654001B2 (en) * 1986-05-08 1997-09-17 株式会社東芝 Machine translation method
JPH0743719B2 (en) * 1986-05-20 1995-05-15 シャープ株式会社 Machine translation device
JPH03268062A (en) * 1990-03-19 1991-11-28 Fujitsu Ltd Register for private use word in machine translation electronic mail device
US5497319A (en) * 1990-12-31 1996-03-05 Trans-Link International Corp. Machine translation and telecommunications system
US5243519A (en) * 1992-02-18 1993-09-07 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for language translation within an interactive software application
JP3220560B2 (en) * 1992-05-26 2001-10-22 シャープ株式会社 Machine translation equipment
US5579223A (en) * 1992-12-24 1996-11-26 Microsoft Corporation Method and system for incorporating modifications made to a computer program into a translated version of the computer program
JP2583386B2 (en) * 1993-03-29 1997-02-19 日本電気株式会社 Keyword automatic extraction device
JP3647518B2 (en) * 1994-10-06 2005-05-11 ゼロックス コーポレイション Device that highlights document images using coded word tokens

Patent Citations (20)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4580218A (en) * 1983-09-08 1986-04-01 At&T Bell Laboratories Indexing subject-locating method
US5005127A (en) * 1987-10-26 1991-04-02 Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha System including means to translate only selected portions of an input sentence and means to translate selected portions according to distinct rules
US5625773A (en) * 1989-04-05 1997-04-29 Xerox Corporation Method of encoding and line breaking text
US4991094A (en) * 1989-04-26 1991-02-05 International Business Machines Corporation Method for language-independent text tokenization using a character categorization
US5276616A (en) * 1989-10-16 1994-01-04 Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha Apparatus for automatically generating index
US5471611A (en) * 1991-03-13 1995-11-28 University Of Strathclyde Computerised information-retrieval database systems
US5577209A (en) * 1991-07-11 1996-11-19 Itt Corporation Apparatus and method for providing multi-level security for communication among computers and terminals on a network
US5423032A (en) * 1991-10-31 1995-06-06 International Business Machines Corporation Method for extracting multi-word technical terms from text
US5523946A (en) * 1992-02-11 1996-06-04 Xerox Corporation Compact encoding of multi-lingual translation dictionaries
US5822435A (en) * 1992-07-10 1998-10-13 Secure Computing Corporation Trusted path subsystem for workstations
US5832227A (en) * 1992-12-14 1998-11-03 The Commonwealth Of Australia Of Anzak Park Method for providing message document security by deleting predetermined header portions and attaching predetermined header portions when seal is validly associated with message or document
US5500796A (en) * 1993-07-22 1996-03-19 General Electric Company Method for extracting open-issue data from textual specifications using natural language text processing
US5799268A (en) * 1994-09-28 1998-08-25 Apple Computer, Inc. Method for extracting knowledge from online documentation and creating a glossary, index, help database or the like
US5721939A (en) * 1995-08-03 1998-02-24 Xerox Corporation Method and apparatus for tokenizing text
US5848386A (en) * 1996-05-28 1998-12-08 Ricoh Company, Ltd. Method and system for translating documents using different translation resources for different portions of the documents
US5819265A (en) * 1996-07-12 1998-10-06 International Business Machines Corporation Processing names in a text
US5828832A (en) * 1996-07-30 1998-10-27 Itt Industries, Inc. Mixed enclave operation in a computer network with multi-level network security
US5692124A (en) * 1996-08-30 1997-11-25 Itt Industries, Inc. Support of limited write downs through trustworthy predictions in multilevel security of computer network communications
US5765176A (en) * 1996-09-06 1998-06-09 Xerox Corporation Performing document image management tasks using an iconic image having embedded encoded information
US5796948A (en) * 1996-11-12 1998-08-18 Cohen; Elliot D. Offensive message interceptor for computers

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1412868A1 (en) * 2001-07-27 2004-04-28 Digital Doors, Inc. Computer software product for data security of sensitive words characters or icons
EP1412868A4 (en) * 2001-07-27 2008-01-02 Digital Doors Inc Computer software product for data security of sensitive words characters or icons
US7546352B1 (en) 2008-08-15 2009-06-09 International Business Machines Corporation Method to automatically merge e-mail replies
US11610582B2 (en) * 2020-03-26 2023-03-21 Paypal, Inc. Systems and methods for formatting informal utterances

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU1382699A (en) 1999-05-31
US5960080A (en) 1999-09-28

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5960080A (en) Method for transforming message containing sensitive information
US7409333B2 (en) Translation of electronically transmitted messages
US7370366B2 (en) Data management system and method
US9380035B2 (en) Decoding of encrypted file
US7020779B1 (en) Secure, distributed e-mail system
US7269731B2 (en) Message authorization system and method
CN1602601B (en) Methods and computer systems for processing and issuance of digital certificates
WO2019236393A1 (en) Obfuscating information related to personally identifiable information (pii)
CA2203355A1 (en) Network profanity interceptor
EP2325756A1 (en) Method and systems for language translation using social networking
KR101160719B1 (en) Method and system for sending electronic mail over a network
US20030005312A1 (en) Apparatus and method for creating a map of a real name word to an anonymous word for an electronic document
CN104717199B (en) Method and apparatus for disposing encryption message
WO2005024645A1 (en) Information processing server and information processing method
KR20060069437A (en) Method, system and program product for automatically formatting electronic mail
US8473576B2 (en) Communication system for process-oriented acquisition, storage, transmission, and provision of data
US20200210956A1 (en) Electronic registered mail methods, apparatus, and system
US20120047553A1 (en) Secure distributed storage of documents containing restricted information, via the use of keysets
CN100456312C (en) Electronic document having authentication function
US9372853B1 (en) Homomorphic document translation
US11727151B2 (en) Pseudonymizing sensitive objects in online content exchanges
Merges Introductory Note to Brief of Amicus Curiae in eBay v. MercExchange
US20030191691A1 (en) Computer system for forming a database
Horstmann et al. “Those things are written by lawyers, and programmers are reading that.” Mapping the Communication Gap Between Software Developers and Privacy Experts
CN110992013A (en) Quick payment and service management system for hospital prescriptions

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AM AT AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY CA CH CN CU CZ CZ DE DE DK DK EE EE ES FI FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MD MG MK MN MW MX NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SK SL TJ TM TR TT UA UG UZ VN YU ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW SD SZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: KR

REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: 8642

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase
NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: CA