WO2000048882A1 - Verfahren und vorrichtung zur überwachung einer mehrzahl von einen prozess erfassenden sensoren, insbesondere für ein esp-system für fahrzeuge - Google Patents
Verfahren und vorrichtung zur überwachung einer mehrzahl von einen prozess erfassenden sensoren, insbesondere für ein esp-system für fahrzeuge Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2000048882A1 WO2000048882A1 PCT/EP2000/000537 EP0000537W WO0048882A1 WO 2000048882 A1 WO2000048882 A1 WO 2000048882A1 EP 0000537 W EP0000537 W EP 0000537W WO 0048882 A1 WO0048882 A1 WO 0048882A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- sensor
- output signals
- sensors
- changes
- plausibility
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
- B60T—VEHICLE BRAKE CONTROL SYSTEMS OR PARTS THEREOF; BRAKE CONTROL SYSTEMS OR PARTS THEREOF, IN GENERAL; ARRANGEMENT OF BRAKING ELEMENTS ON VEHICLES IN GENERAL; PORTABLE DEVICES FOR PREVENTING UNWANTED MOVEMENT OF VEHICLES; VEHICLE MODIFICATIONS TO FACILITATE COOLING OF BRAKES
- B60T8/00—Arrangements for adjusting wheel-braking force to meet varying vehicular or ground-surface conditions, e.g. limiting or varying distribution of braking force
- B60T8/32—Arrangements for adjusting wheel-braking force to meet varying vehicular or ground-surface conditions, e.g. limiting or varying distribution of braking force responsive to a speed condition, e.g. acceleration or deceleration
- B60T8/88—Arrangements for adjusting wheel-braking force to meet varying vehicular or ground-surface conditions, e.g. limiting or varying distribution of braking force responsive to a speed condition, e.g. acceleration or deceleration with failure responsive means, i.e. means for detecting and indicating faulty operation of the speed responsive control means
- B60T8/885—Arrangements for adjusting wheel-braking force to meet varying vehicular or ground-surface conditions, e.g. limiting or varying distribution of braking force responsive to a speed condition, e.g. acceleration or deceleration with failure responsive means, i.e. means for detecting and indicating faulty operation of the speed responsive control means using electrical circuitry
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
- B60T—VEHICLE BRAKE CONTROL SYSTEMS OR PARTS THEREOF; BRAKE CONTROL SYSTEMS OR PARTS THEREOF, IN GENERAL; ARRANGEMENT OF BRAKING ELEMENTS ON VEHICLES IN GENERAL; PORTABLE DEVICES FOR PREVENTING UNWANTED MOVEMENT OF VEHICLES; VEHICLE MODIFICATIONS TO FACILITATE COOLING OF BRAKES
- B60T8/00—Arrangements for adjusting wheel-braking force to meet varying vehicular or ground-surface conditions, e.g. limiting or varying distribution of braking force
- B60T8/17—Using electrical or electronic regulation means to control braking
- B60T8/1755—Brake regulation specially adapted to control the stability of the vehicle, e.g. taking into account yaw rate or transverse acceleration in a curve
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
- B60T—VEHICLE BRAKE CONTROL SYSTEMS OR PARTS THEREOF; BRAKE CONTROL SYSTEMS OR PARTS THEREOF, IN GENERAL; ARRANGEMENT OF BRAKING ELEMENTS ON VEHICLES IN GENERAL; PORTABLE DEVICES FOR PREVENTING UNWANTED MOVEMENT OF VEHICLES; VEHICLE MODIFICATIONS TO FACILITATE COOLING OF BRAKES
- B60T2270/00—Further aspects of brake control systems not otherwise provided for
- B60T2270/40—Failsafe aspects of brake control systems
- B60T2270/413—Plausibility monitoring, cross check, redundancy
Definitions
- Method and device for monitoring a plurality of sensors detecting a process in particular for an ESP system for vehicles
- the invention relates to a method and a device for monitoring a plurality of sensors which detect a process, the process in particular an electronic one
- Stability program (ESP) for vehicles can be.
- Electronic stability programs of this type are vehicle dynamics control systems that serve to support the driver in critical driving situations during braking, acceleration and steering and to intervene where the driver himself has no direct intervention.
- the control system supports the driver when braking, in particular on a road with a low or changing coefficient of friction, on which the vehicle can no longer be steerable or can skid due to locking wheels, and also when accelerating, where there is a risk of the drive wheels spinning, and finally when steering in a curve in which the vehicle could oversteer or understeer. Overall, this not only improves comfort, but also active safety.
- Such a control system is based on a closed control loop, which takes over typical control tasks in normal operation of the vehicle and is intended to intercept the vehicle as quickly as possible in extreme driving situations. Sensors for recording the various driving dynamics parameters are of particular importance as actual value transmitters.
- a Plausible control presupposes that the sensors correctly reflect the actual state of the controlled system. This is particularly important in the case of driving stability control in extreme driving situations in which a control deviation has to be corrected within a very short time. For this reason, in an electronic stability program, the ESP sensors (yaw rate sensor, lateral acceleration sensor, steering angle sensor) must be constantly monitored in order to be able to detect errors in the sensors at an early stage, so that incorrect control that could bring the vehicle into a safety-critical state is excluded becomes.
- ESP sensors can e.g. have so-called clamping errors. These errors cause malfunctions which lead to the sensors constantly displaying constant values in their useful range, so that the driving dynamics cannot be reproduced correctly. In certain driving situations with low dynamics, it cannot be ruled out that such a clamping error may go undetected.
- the invention is therefore based on the object of providing a method and a device for monitoring a plurality of sensors that detect a process, such as, for example, an electronic stability program (ESP) for vehicles, with which the risk of incorrect measurement due to clamping errors of the sensors is significantly reduced.
- ESP electronic stability program
- the object is further achieved with a device according to claim 7, which has a clamping error detection with a first device for detecting changes over time in the output signals of the sensors and a second device for comparing and checking the changes in terms of their plausibility, which are caused by the process depends on the dependencies of the sensor output signals, and for generating an error message if the plausibility is not present.
- the invention can be combined particularly advantageously with an ESP system for vehicles, which is controlled by a microprocessor unit, the process being the electronic driving stability program and the sensors being a yaw rate sensor, a lateral acceleration sensor and a steering angle sensor and the first and second devices being a subroutine in the Microprocessor unit is implemented.
- the invention is particularly suitable for combination with a model-based monitoring of the sensors of an electronic stability program (ESP) for vehicles, which is described in the parallel application 199 29 155.1 and is hereby made part of this disclosure by reference.
- ESP electronic stability program
- one of the sensors is monitored in each case by its output signal having analytical reference values (redundancies) is compared, which are determined with the aid of a multiple process model from currently unobservable process control or process parameters.
- analytical reference values redundancies
- FIG. 1 shows a schematic block diagram of a device according to the invention
- An essential principle of the monitoring method consists in carrying out a plausibility check on the basis of the physical relationships of the output signals of the various sensors that detect a process, including a characteristic analysis of the sensor signals in the event of a clamping error, in order to discover the clamping errors.
- Monitoring can be carried out cyclically with predetermined time intervals. Investigations have shown that, in the event of a clamping error, the ESP sensors generate output signals independent of driving maneuvers which only reproduce hardware-related stochastic signals such as measurement noise. For this reason, it can be assumed that the output signals are virtually constant after low-pass filtering. A check of the change in the sensor signals thus enables an effective feature analysis with which clamping errors can be recognized.
- the plausibility check is based on the following findings: If a vehicle drives the normal driving maneuvers, which should be understood, for example, as a stationary straight-ahead drive, a stationary circular drive and the usual changing maneuvers, the relationship between the output signals of the three ESP sensors (yaw rate sensor, steering angle sensor, Describe the lateral acceleration sensor) in the fault-free case as follows:
- ki and k2 are two constants dependent on a vehicle reference speed and yi, y 2 and y 3 denote the yaw rate, the steering wheel angle and the lateral acceleration, respectively.
- ⁇ yi, ⁇ y2 and ⁇ y 3 denote changes in the sensor signals, which, as already explained above, play an important role in the feature analysis and thus in the detection of the clamping error.
- the changes over time are not used to evaluate the changes in the sensor signals, but rather the absolute value of the time derivative of the sensor output signals is integrated over a period of time te [t,, t 2 ], according to the following formula:
- threshold values are introduced. Two monitoring thresholds are defined for each sensor, namely
- a high threshold SH if ⁇ yi> Sjji, this means that the sensor is acted upon by a corresponding measured variable, that is to say that, for example in the case of the lateral acceleration sensor, there is a time-variable transverse dynamics (changing maneuvers).
- both threshold values should be kept as low as possible.
- the sensors can be monitored during a journey according to the following criteria: error-free operation can be assumed if:
- FIG. 1 shows a schematic block diagram of a corresponding circuit, which can essentially also be implemented with a program.
- the output signals of the three ESP sensors 10, 11, 12 are each fed to a low-pass filter 13, 14, 15, the output signals of which are applied to a first device 16 to determine the changes over time.
- This has a differentiator assigned to each sensor for the temporal derivation of the output signals of the sensors and an integrator for integrating the amount of the temporal derivation of the output signals.
- the changes ⁇ yi determined in this way are fed to a second device 17, with which they are compared with the threshold values S ⁇ i, S £ , i and subjected to a plausibility check, and which, if appropriate, generates an error signal FM.
- This monitoring mechanism can be carried out under program control by programming a microprocessor unit 16 accordingly.
- the determined changes in the sensor signals are then compared in a comparison and evaluation device 17 for each sensor signal with the respective monitoring thresholds S L A s H if only for each sensor i. If the plausibility check described above shows that one of the deviations is zero while all other deviations are not zero, an error message FM is generated.
- FIGS. 2 and 3 show two examples of different time profiles for the sensor output signals and the error signal.
- Figure 2a shows the output signal of the yaw rate sensor
- Figure 2b shows the output signal of the lateral acceleration sensor
- Figure 2c shows the output signal of the steering angle sensor
- Figure 2d an error message.
- Figures 3a to 3c each show the output signals of the same sensors as in Figures 2a to 2c, in which case the vehicle is in a straight line on a bad path.
- the changes of all three ESP sensors are simultaneously greater than their low thresholds. For this reason, the monitoring mechanism assumes that none of the sensors has a clamping error, and an error message (Figure 3d) is not generated.
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP00901130A EP1152933B1 (de) | 1999-02-18 | 2000-01-25 | Verfahren und vorrichtung zur überwachung einer mehrzahl von einen prozess erfassenden sensoren, insbesondere für ein esp-system für fahrzeuge |
US09/913,147 US6594563B1 (en) | 1999-02-18 | 2000-01-25 | Method and device for monitoring a plurality of sensors detecting a process, notably for an ESP system for vehicles |
DE50005991T DE50005991D1 (de) | 1999-02-18 | 2000-01-25 | Verfahren und vorrichtung zur überwachung einer mehrzahl von einen prozess erfassenden sensoren, insbesondere für ein esp-system für fahrzeuge |
JP2000599638A JP2003520362A (ja) | 1999-02-18 | 2000-01-25 | 特に車両用espシステムのためのプロセスを検出する複数のセンサを監視する方法と装置 |
Applications Claiming Priority (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE19906795 | 1999-02-18 | ||
DE19906795.3 | 1999-02-18 | ||
DE19936434A DE19936434A1 (de) | 1999-02-18 | 1999-08-03 | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Überwachung einer Mehrzahl von einen Prozeß erfassenden Sensoren, insbesondere für ein ESP-System für Fahrzeuge |
DE19936434.6 | 1999-08-03 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2000048882A1 true WO2000048882A1 (de) | 2000-08-24 |
Family
ID=26051918
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2000/000537 WO2000048882A1 (de) | 1999-02-18 | 2000-01-25 | Verfahren und vorrichtung zur überwachung einer mehrzahl von einen prozess erfassenden sensoren, insbesondere für ein esp-system für fahrzeuge |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US6594563B1 (de) |
EP (1) | EP1152933B1 (de) |
JP (1) | JP2003520362A (de) |
WO (1) | WO2000048882A1 (de) |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2004024521A1 (de) * | 2002-08-27 | 2004-03-25 | Continental Teves Ag & Co. Ohg | Verfahren zur überwachung von fahrwerksfunktionen und fahrwerksbauteilen |
DE10145485B4 (de) * | 2001-09-14 | 2007-12-27 | Siemens Ag | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Diagnose eines Sensors |
FR2909627A1 (fr) * | 2006-12-06 | 2008-06-13 | Bosch Gmbh Robert | Systeme de controle dynamique de trajectoire. |
EP2039573A3 (de) * | 2007-09-11 | 2010-04-14 | Nissin Kogyo Co., Ltd. | Vorrichtung zur Regelung des Fahrverhaltens eines Fahrzeugs |
Families Citing this family (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE10290206D2 (de) * | 2001-01-26 | 2003-12-24 | Continental Teves Ag & Co Ohg | Verfahren zur Regelung der Fahrstabilität |
US8024088B2 (en) * | 2001-08-01 | 2011-09-20 | Nexteer (Beijing) Technology Co., Ltd. | Rear steering sensor diagnostic algorithm for four-wheel steering systems |
DE102004017385A1 (de) * | 2004-04-08 | 2005-10-27 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Koordination eines Fahrdynamikregelungssystems mit anderen Fahrzeugstabilisierungssystemen |
DE102004018623A1 (de) * | 2004-04-16 | 2005-11-03 | Wabco Gmbh & Co.Ohg | Verfahren zum Betrieb eines Sensors |
US7472337B2 (en) * | 2005-03-22 | 2008-12-30 | Cummins, Inc. | Method and system for detecting faults in an electronic engine control module |
US7515995B2 (en) * | 2005-06-28 | 2009-04-07 | General Electric Company | Continuous median failure control system and method |
JP4462153B2 (ja) * | 2005-09-14 | 2010-05-12 | 株式会社アドヴィックス | 制動力配分制御装置 |
US20070078576A1 (en) * | 2005-10-04 | 2007-04-05 | Salman Mutasim A | System and method for fuzzy-logic based fault diagnosis |
KR101229444B1 (ko) * | 2006-11-07 | 2013-02-06 | 주식회사 만도 | 자동차의 전자제어장치용 가속도 센서 및 휠 가속도 센서의고장진단방법 |
CN100449292C (zh) * | 2006-11-08 | 2009-01-07 | 吉林大学 | 轿车电子稳定性控制系统的硬件在回路试验台架 |
GB2567431B (en) * | 2017-10-10 | 2020-01-15 | Continental Automotive Romania Srl | Method of diagnosing failure in an electronic control unit |
DE102019113490A1 (de) * | 2019-05-21 | 2020-11-26 | Dr. Ing. H.C. F. Porsche Aktiengesellschaft | Verfahren zur Plausibilisierung einer Querbeschleunigung und einer Anzahl weiterer Eingangsgrößen eines Getriebeschaltprogramms eines automatisierten Schaltgetriebes eines Kraftfahrzeugs |
Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0716000A2 (de) * | 1994-12-07 | 1996-06-12 | Mercedes-Benz Ag | Verfahren zur Bestimmung der Fahrbahnneigung |
DE19636443A1 (de) * | 1996-09-07 | 1998-03-12 | Bosch Gmbh Robert | Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Überwachung von Sensoren in einem Fahrzeug |
DE19708508A1 (de) * | 1996-09-24 | 1998-03-26 | Bosch Gmbh Robert | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Regelung einer die Fahrzeugbewegung repräsentierenden Bewegungsgröße |
DE19749058A1 (de) * | 1997-07-02 | 1999-01-07 | Bosch Gmbh Robert | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Regelung einer die Fahrzeugbewegung repräsentierenden Bewegungsgröße |
Family Cites Families (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5415641A (en) * | 1991-04-01 | 1995-05-16 | Sherwood Medical Company | Drop detection method and apparatus |
US5691903A (en) * | 1995-09-08 | 1997-11-25 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Integrated cable navigation and control system |
DE19749005A1 (de) * | 1997-06-30 | 1999-01-07 | Bosch Gmbh Robert | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Regelung von die Fahrzeugbewegung repräsentierenden Bewegungsgrößen |
-
2000
- 2000-01-25 JP JP2000599638A patent/JP2003520362A/ja not_active Withdrawn
- 2000-01-25 WO PCT/EP2000/000537 patent/WO2000048882A1/de active IP Right Grant
- 2000-01-25 US US09/913,147 patent/US6594563B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2000-01-25 EP EP00901130A patent/EP1152933B1/de not_active Expired - Lifetime
Patent Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0716000A2 (de) * | 1994-12-07 | 1996-06-12 | Mercedes-Benz Ag | Verfahren zur Bestimmung der Fahrbahnneigung |
DE19636443A1 (de) * | 1996-09-07 | 1998-03-12 | Bosch Gmbh Robert | Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Überwachung von Sensoren in einem Fahrzeug |
DE19708508A1 (de) * | 1996-09-24 | 1998-03-26 | Bosch Gmbh Robert | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Regelung einer die Fahrzeugbewegung repräsentierenden Bewegungsgröße |
DE19749058A1 (de) * | 1997-07-02 | 1999-01-07 | Bosch Gmbh Robert | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Regelung einer die Fahrzeugbewegung repräsentierenden Bewegungsgröße |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE10145485B4 (de) * | 2001-09-14 | 2007-12-27 | Siemens Ag | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Diagnose eines Sensors |
WO2004024521A1 (de) * | 2002-08-27 | 2004-03-25 | Continental Teves Ag & Co. Ohg | Verfahren zur überwachung von fahrwerksfunktionen und fahrwerksbauteilen |
FR2909627A1 (fr) * | 2006-12-06 | 2008-06-13 | Bosch Gmbh Robert | Systeme de controle dynamique de trajectoire. |
EP2039573A3 (de) * | 2007-09-11 | 2010-04-14 | Nissin Kogyo Co., Ltd. | Vorrichtung zur Regelung des Fahrverhaltens eines Fahrzeugs |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP1152933B1 (de) | 2004-04-07 |
US6594563B1 (en) | 2003-07-15 |
JP2003520362A (ja) | 2003-07-02 |
EP1152933A1 (de) | 2001-11-14 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP1149006B1 (de) | Verfahren und vorrichtung zur sensorüberwachung, insbesondere für ein esp-system für fahrzeuge | |
EP1154919B1 (de) | Sensoranordnung mit überwachungseinrichtung, insbesondere für ein esp-system für fahrzeuge | |
EP1692026B1 (de) | Verfahren und anordnung zur überwachung einer in einem radfahrzeug angeordneten messeinrichtung | |
EP1152933B1 (de) | Verfahren und vorrichtung zur überwachung einer mehrzahl von einen prozess erfassenden sensoren, insbesondere für ein esp-system für fahrzeuge | |
DE19939872B4 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Sensorüberwachung insbesondere für ein ESP-System für Fahrzeuge | |
DE19636443A1 (de) | Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Überwachung von Sensoren in einem Fahrzeug | |
DE102005047021B3 (de) | Anordnung zur Bestimmung eines absoluten Neigungswinkels gegenüber der Horizontalen | |
EP2668074A1 (de) | Verfahren zur erkennung und korrektur der fahrzeugreferenzgeschwindigkeit und fahrzeugsystem | |
DE19803386A1 (de) | Vorrichtung zur Überwachung des Luftdrucks eines Fahrzeugreifens | |
EP1284204A2 (de) | Anordnung zur Fahrzeugpositionszuordnung von Rädern eines Fahrzeugs | |
EP1118519B1 (de) | Verfahren zur Erkennung des fehlerhaften Einbaus eines Steuergerätes in einem Fahrzeug | |
DE10333323B4 (de) | Verfahren zur Ausfallerkennung von Sensoren, insbesondere für ein ESP System für Fahrzeuge | |
DE10065759A1 (de) | Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Überwachung eines Drucksensors | |
DE19521411A1 (de) | Verfahren und Anordnung zur Bestimmung der Geschwindigkeit eines Fahrzeuges | |
EP2544935A1 (de) | Verfahren und vorrichtung zur erkennung einer abweichung eines drehratensignals eines drehratensensors | |
DE102007013261B4 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Schätzen der Quergeschwindigkeit eines Fahrzeuges | |
DE19936434A1 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Überwachung einer Mehrzahl von einen Prozeß erfassenden Sensoren, insbesondere für ein ESP-System für Fahrzeuge | |
DE19856304A1 (de) | Vorrichtung und Vorrichtung zum Überprüfen und Korrigieren der Ausgabe eines Lenkwinkelsensors | |
DE19936439A1 (de) | Sensoranordnung mit Überwachungseinrichtung, insbesondere für ein ESP-System für Fahrzeuge | |
EP1240038B1 (de) | Verfahren und vorrichtung zur erkennung eines druckverlustes von reifen in kraftfahrzeugen | |
WO2022084296A1 (de) | Verfahren zum ermitteln einer fahrzeugorientierung, computerprogrammprodukt, fahrassistenzsystem und fahrzeug | |
EP2057054B1 (de) | Verfahren und vorrichtung zum ermitteln einer aktuellen fahrzeuglängsgeschwindigkeit | |
EP1636076B1 (de) | Verfahren zum regeln eines prozesses zur durchführung einer fahrstabilitätsregelung | |
EP1628863B1 (de) | Vorrichtung und verfahren zum messen von bewegungsgrössen eines kraftfahrzeugs | |
EP3789264A1 (de) | Verfahren und vorrichtung zur schlupferkennung sowie schienenfahrzeug |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): JP US |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE |
|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
DFPE | Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101) | ||
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2000901130 Country of ref document: EP |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: JP Ref document number: 2000 599638 Kind code of ref document: A Format of ref document f/p: F |
|
WWP | Wipo information: published in national office |
Ref document number: 2000901130 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 09913147 Country of ref document: US |
|
WWG | Wipo information: grant in national office |
Ref document number: 2000901130 Country of ref document: EP |