WO2000075678A1 - Battery capacity measurement - Google Patents

Battery capacity measurement Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2000075678A1
WO2000075678A1 PCT/NZ2000/000089 NZ0000089W WO0075678A1 WO 2000075678 A1 WO2000075678 A1 WO 2000075678A1 NZ 0000089 W NZ0000089 W NZ 0000089W WO 0075678 A1 WO0075678 A1 WO 0075678A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
battery
voltage
discharge
variable
parameter
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/NZ2000/000089
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Adnan H. Anbuky
Phillip E. Pascoe
Original Assignee
Invensys Energy Systems (Nz) Limited
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Invensys Energy Systems (Nz) Limited filed Critical Invensys Energy Systems (Nz) Limited
Priority to US09/979,906 priority Critical patent/US6924622B1/en
Priority to EP00931767A priority patent/EP1188063A1/en
Priority to AU49597/00A priority patent/AU4959700A/en
Publication of WO2000075678A1 publication Critical patent/WO2000075678A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01RMEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G01R31/00Arrangements for testing electric properties; Arrangements for locating electric faults; Arrangements for electrical testing characterised by what is being tested not provided for elsewhere
    • G01R31/36Arrangements for testing, measuring or monitoring the electrical condition of accumulators or electric batteries, e.g. capacity or state of charge [SoC]
    • G01R31/382Arrangements for monitoring battery or accumulator variables, e.g. SoC
    • G01R31/3835Arrangements for monitoring battery or accumulator variables, e.g. SoC involving only voltage measurements

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method of obtaining information relating to the charge capacity of a battery. It relates in particular, although not exclusively, to a method of obtaining information relating to the charge capacity of a battery which is in a fully charged condition, without the need to fully discharge the battery.
  • the existing battery capacity measurement techniques are either not acceptable to the telecommunications community because they leave a system vulnerable to failure, demand high cost, impose long delays between testing, require manual measurement procedure, or are not allowed due to telecommunications standards (as is the case with rectification noise levels).
  • a full discharge test into a stable load is recommended by industry and professional institutions as the only reliable approach for battery capacity measurement and is often referred to as the "capacity test” .
  • This approach suffers from substantial disadvantages including the requirement of bulky external loads, the need for backup power supplies, and the labour required to set up and supervise the procedure.
  • Lately impedance/conductance techniques have become popular for obtaining estimates of battery capacity. These techniques require the use of specialised equipment. In addition there is some uncertainty surrounding their effectiveness with most of the researchers dealing with these techniques being reluctant to promote them as a replacement to the "capacity test" .
  • Accumulation type techniques depend on an estimation of charging efficiency and require correction factors for different discharge temperatures and rates. In addition they are not tolerant to disruptions to their short term data history.
  • Curve fitting and parametric models are two other common approaches which also suffer from the requirement of correction factors for different discharge temperature and rates. Curve fitting models try to match the discharge voltage versus time curve to either an exponential parabolic or hyperbolic curve. Some models employ more complex hybrid approaches. The major disadvantage with these models is that for each combination of discharge conditions and battery type a parameter set is required. These parameter sets are obtained through an exhaustive series of discharge tests. Parametric models are based on internal battery parameters such as internal resistance. Models such as this estimate SOC (state of charge) or reserve time by redrawing the manufacturers discharge voltage time curves based on the change in internal resistance. Battery resistance, however, is not always supplied by the manufacturer and therefore must be measured.
  • the present invention seeks to provide a method by which at least some of the aforedescribed disadvantages are mitigated or overcome. It seeks to provide a method which at the least provides information concerning the capacity of one battery relative to that of another battery, and/or the capacity as influenced by the operating conditions and optionally additionally or alternatively information concerning the absolute or intrinsic charge capacity of a battery. Summary of the Invention
  • the invention provides a method of obtaining information relating to the charge capacity of one or more cells including: measuring a variable cell parameter, or change in a variable cell parameter, for at least a part of an initial period of discharge during which the cell voltage initially decreases to a trough voltage and then increases to a plateau voltage; and relating the variable cell parameter, or change in the variable cell parameter, to reference information to obtain the absolute or relative charge capacity of the cell or cells.
  • the invention provides a method of estimating the capacity of a battery including: acquiring reference information relating a variable battery parameter, or change in a variable battery parameter, to one or more operating conditions and/or battery condition; measuring the variable battery parameter, or change in the variable battery parameter, during at least part of an initial discharge period of the battery, during which the voltage initially decreases to a trough voltage and then increases to a plateau voltage; and relating the variable battery parameter, or change in variable battery parameter, to reference information to obtain an absolute or relative capacity of the battery.
  • the variable cell parameter may be measure with respect to a single electrode.
  • the invention envisages that preferably, but not exclusively, measurements are made of cell or electrode voltage, or change of voltage with time, for at least a part of the period of time during which the battery voltage initially decreases to a trough voltage and then increases to a plateau voltage.
  • the initial period during which the battery output voltage initially decreases to a trough voltage and then increases to a plateau voltage is the Coup De Fouet period.
  • the reference information is the relationship between one or more battery operating conditions and/or battery condition and the trough voltage or plateau voltage of the Coup De Fouet period.
  • the operating conditions may be one or more of time on charge and/or depth of previous charge and/or float voltage and/or ambient temperature and/or discharge rate.
  • the reference information is acquired when the battery is in the early stages of its operational life.
  • the battery is in a substantially fully charged condition.
  • Measurement of the variable battery parameter may occur when the battery is subjected an initial period of discharge (a discharge test) or when the battery begins to discharge when required to supply a load. Thus, when a battery begins to discharge into a load the discharge time remaining may be calculated. Alternatively, to determine remaining operational life of the battery it may be subjected to a discharge test.
  • the method may include use of discrimination means which compares a change of a measured or monitored variable parameter with a change which is compatible with that which occurs in the Coup De Fouet period of initial discharge and responds to whether or not that compatibility is present.
  • discrimination means which compares a change of a measured or monitored variable parameter with a change which is compatible with that which occurs in the Coup De Fouet period of initial discharge and responds to whether or not that compatibility is present.
  • the method of the invention comprises a search for the occurrence of the trough or plateau voltage, and measurement of that trough and/or plateau voltage from which capacity is determined using a parameterised relationship.
  • the invention is intended particularly for measurement of the capacity, or relative capacity, of a battery of a kind in which electrical discharge results in a chemical reaction that produces reaction discharge products.
  • batteries typically exhibit the Coup De Fouet characteristic during initial discharge from a fully charged condition, with the voltage initially reducing to a trough voltage and then increasing to a plateau voltage from which it then decreases progressively as the battery is discharged.
  • this invention may be utilised in respect of electrochemical batteries where at least one of the electroactive components is in the liquid phase and therefore under diffusion control, such as a lead/acid battery where the sulphuric acid takes part in the discharge and recharge reactions.
  • the invention may be applied to lead/acid type batteries and other batteries which are re-chargeable.
  • use of the invention to measure the charge of batteries of a non- rechargeable type is not excluded.
  • the period of discharge necessary to establish information related to battery charge capacity by the method of the present invention is substantially less than the time taken for full discharge, and the loss of charge for the purpose of charge determination also is substantially less.
  • a short discharge test of not more than 1 0% of nominal capacity in discharge depth is found to be sufficient to reveal information related to the absolute or relative charge capacity of the battery.
  • a discharge of not more than 5 % and more preferably not more than 1 % of nominal capacity may be employed.
  • the invention envisages that preferably, but not exclusively, the function of one or more of the above steps is performed by a computer.
  • the invention further provides for an estimation model for predicting the absolute or relative capacity of a battery, including: input for a variable battery parameter, and one or more battery operating conditions and/or battery condition; reference information relating variable battery parameter to one or more battery operating conditions and/or battery condition; compensation means determining correction factor for variable battery parameter depending on value any one of battery operating conditions and/or battery condition; and calculation means relating corrected variable battery parameter to reference information to obtain the absolute or relative charge capacity of the battery.
  • the method may include use of training or learning means adapted to determine reference information relating a variable battery parameter to one or more battery operating conditions and/or battery condition; or to determine rules relating variable battery parameter, or change in variable battery parameter, to one or more battery operating conditions and/or battery condition.
  • training or learning means may be any one of an Adaptive Neural Fuzzy Interface System or an Adaptive Network, or other Neuro-Fuzzy or Soft Computing system.
  • the estimation model may be in the form of computer readable code.
  • an apparatus adapted to provide information relating to the charge capacity of a battery, including: measurement means adapted to measure a variable battery parameter, or change in variable battery parameter; and processing means adapted to relate the variable battery parameter, or change in variable battery parameter, to reference information to obtain the absolute or relative charge capacity of the battery.
  • the apparatus may measure voltage, or change of voltage, for at least part of an initial period of discharge of a battery during which the battery voltage initially decreases to a trough voltage and then increases to a plateau voltage; and may also measure one or more battery operating conditions.
  • the apparatus includes a microprocessor adapted to manipulate a variable battery parameter, or change in variable battery parameter, and one or more battery operating conditions and/or battery condition and output an estimation of the absolute or relative charge capacity of the battery.
  • the microprocessor may be adapted to output the discharge time remaining expressed in hours and fractions of an hour, and/or be adapted to output the remaining operational life of the battery.
  • the output means may be graphical, numerical or otherwise.
  • the apparatus may further include a discharge means, the discharge means adapted to at least partially discharge a battery and measure the variable battery parameter, or change in variable battery parameter, for at least part of the partial discharge.
  • the apparatus may also include training or learning means adapted to determine rules relating a variable battery parameter, or change in a variable battery parameter, to one or more battery operating conditions and/or battery condition.
  • FIGURES 1 a - 1d illustrates the Coup De Fouet region during cell discharge
  • FIGURES 2a - 2d illustrates the shape of the Coup De Fouet for previous discharges to various depths
  • FIGURES 3a - 3d illustrates the dependence of the Coup De Fouet on the time on charge
  • FIGURES 4a - 4b illustrates the influence of float voltage on Coup De Fouet
  • FIGURES 5a - 5b illustrates the shape of the Coup De Fouet for various discharge rates
  • FIGURES 6a - 6b illustrates the shape of the Coup De Fouet for various ambient temperatures
  • FIGURES 7a - 7b illustrates the relation between Coup De Fouet and capacity for different discharge rates
  • FIGURES 8a - 8b illustrates the relation between Coup De Fouet and capacity for different ambient temperatures
  • FIGURES 9a - 9d illustrates the influence of accelerated thermal ageing on Coup De Fouet
  • FIGURES 10a-10d illustrates the influence of accelerated thermally and water replenishment on Coup De Fouet
  • FIGURE 1 1 illustrates a fuzzy logic correction model employed for capacity estimation
  • FIGURE 12 illustrates a Coup De Fouet capacity estimation model
  • FIGURES 13a-13b illustrates the results of the capacity estimation model
  • TABLE 1 Shows data for the original and post ageing capacity of cells
  • the Coup De Fouet is an electrochemical phenomenon.
  • the invention is intended particularly for measurement of the capacity, or relative capacity, of a battery of a kind in which electrical discharge results in a chemical reaction that produces reaction discharge products.
  • Such batteries typically exhibit the Coup De Fouet characteristic during initial discharge from a fully charged condition, with the voltage initially reducing to a trough voltage and then increasing to a plateau voltage from which it then decreases progressively as the battery is discharged.
  • this invention may be utilised in respect of electrochemical batteries where at least one of the electroactive components is in the liquid phase and therefore under diffusion control, such as a lead/acid battery where the sulphuric acid takes part in the discharge and recharge reactions.
  • the invention may be applied to lead/acid type batteries and other batteries which are re-chargeable.
  • the voltage drops quickly to a trough voltage and then increases to a peak, plateau voltage within about 4 to 5 minutes from initial discharge. The voltage then gradually reduces as the cell discharges.
  • the invention identifies that the level of the trough and plateau voltages during the Coup De Fouet period are influenced by the operating conditions and condition of the battery. Typical operating conditions which effect the Coup De Fouet are depth of previous discharge, time on float charge, float voltage, ambient temperature and discharge rate. The effect that each of these conditions has on Coup De Fouet is discussed in turn.
  • Figures 2a to 2d illustrate consecutive discharges of an Oldham 2HI275 cell to various depths.
  • the discharge rate was 100A and the ambient temperature was 20°C.
  • After each discharge 1 10% of the charge released during the discharge was supplied to the cell and then it was charged for a further 24 hours. Under these operating conditions the cell is rated to release 1 77Ah of charge when discharged to a depth of 1 .85V.
  • Figure 2a illustrates discharges to a depth of 1 % ( ⁇ 1 .8Ah) .
  • the first discharge is normal with the voltage decreasing to the trough before recovering.
  • Figures 3a to 3d illustrate the dependence of the Coup De Fouet on the time on charge.
  • Figure 3a illustrates the Coup De Fouet region of consecutive discharges to a depth of 1 2.5% of an Oldham 2HI275 cell at a rate of 100A and ambient temperature of 20°C.
  • Figure 3b illustrates the trough region in greater detail. It is apparent that the longer the cell is charged, the deeper the trough voltage is. This is clear from Figures 3c and 3d where the trough and plateau voltages are plotted against charge time respectively.
  • FIG 4a illustrates consecutive discharges of an Oldham cell to a depth of 1 2.5 % at a rate of 100A and ambient temperature of 20°C. Between each discharge the cell was recharge for a fixed period of 30 hours utilising float voltages of 2.22, 2.27 and 2.32V. The nominal float voltage for the operating conditions is 2.27V.
  • Figure 4b illustrates the relation between the float voltage and the trough and plateau voltages. It is apparent that the lower the float voltage the lower the trough and plateau voltages.
  • Tests were conducted to establish the relationship between capacity and Coup De Fouet for different combinations of discharge rate and ambient temperature.
  • the battery when configured as a 1 2 volt string and discharged at 100 amps over a period of about 2 hours.
  • the discharge profiles of those cells during the initial Coup De Fouet period are summarised below.
  • Figure 6a shows seven discharge voltages vs. time profiles for the cells when being discharged at different ambient temperatures. The results for the Coup De Fouet period are shown in more detail by Figure 6b.
  • Figure 7a and 7b and Figure 8a and 8b illustrate the key results from these tests.
  • Figures 7a and 7b illustrate the relation between capacity due to the use of various discharge rates and the trough and plateau voltage parameters respectively.
  • Figures 8a and 8b illustrate the relation between capacity due to the use of various ambient temperatures and the trough and plateau voltage parameters respectively. For both operating conditions and for both parameters (the trough and plateau voltage) the relations are close to linear. This examination of the voltage of the battery during the Coup De Fouet period may be used to conveniently provide information related to the battery capacity.
  • Determining the capacity due to operating conditions is helpful if prompt time remaining information is required at the start of a discharge.
  • the ultimate aim is to determine the capacity due to the condition of the battery alone and not the operating conditions.
  • the effects of battery condition on the Coup De Fouet must be determined. Investigations were undertaken to determine the influence of battery condition on the Coup De Fouet due to two modes of battery degradation. The first mode is accelerated thermal ageing. The 5 second mode is the result of replenishing the water lost from the cells which had undergone the accelerated thermal ageing.
  • Accelerated ageing is commonly used to rate a battery's operational life.
  • the experiment was conducted by charging four pairs of Oldham 2HI275 cells at the ⁇ o nominal 20°C float voltage of 2.27V, and ambient temperature of 71 °C, for from 2 to 5 periods. Each period consisted of 1 3 days. A further pair of cells were charged under standard conditions (2.27V, 20°C ambient temperature). As a result, after discharging at a rate of 100A to an end voltage of 1 .85V, the cells exhibited capacities of between 1 0% and 1 23% of manufacturers rated capacity ( 1 77Ah) .
  • the original and post ageing capacities are given in Table 1 .
  • the original capacity is given as a percentage related to the ten hour discharge to an end voltage of 1 .75V.
  • the important point to note is the consistency of the cells original capacity and the variation in the cells capacity after ageing .
  • the cells were weighed prior to undergoing the accelerated ageing. After the accelerated ageing they were re-weighed with the resulting difference in weight giving an indication in the amount of water lost during the process.
  • the pre and post ageing weights along with the weight differences are given in Table 2.
  • Figures 9a to 9d illustrate the effect of accelerated thermal ageing on the Coup De Fouet.
  • Figure 9a illustrates the entire discharge voltage profiles of each pair of cells and
  • Figure 9b illustrates a close up of the Coup De Fouet region of the discharges.
  • the cells which have the lowest capacity have a lower Coup De Fouet (trough 30 and plateau voltages) .
  • the relation between the capacity due to the degradation in battery condition with the trough and plateau voltages is illustrated in Figures 9c and 9d respectively. It can be seen here that in both cases the relation is close to linear.
  • Table 2 it was possible to replenish the water lost through the thermal ageing process. The cells were then re-charged and discharged.
  • the knowledge gathered by conducting the above tests represents a baseline for the rules of this model.
  • the following paragraphs present the structure of the model and the result of its application.
  • the following discussion will consider only the trough voltage.
  • the trough is targeted as it occurs close to the start of discharge.
  • a discharge to the trough will result in minimal impact on the power system and battery life. It is also easy to detect due to the sudden voltage reversal.
  • the discussion may be applied equally to the plateau voltage.
  • the knowledge of the relations between operating conditions and the trough voltage are contained within a fuzzy logic model.
  • Such models are within the capabilities of the skilled addressee with one particular model, the Sugeno Fuzzy Model, being discussed by T. Takag and M. Sugeno in "Fuzzy Identification Systems and its Application to modelling and control", IEEE Trans, Systa, Man Cybern, Vol. 1 5, pp. ⁇ o 1 1 6-1 32, 1 985; the contents of which is considered included in this specification as if it were individually set forth.
  • the Sugeno Fuzzy Model is illustrated in Figure 1 1 .
  • the fuzzy model has as inputs the operating conditions of time on charge, float voltage, depth of previous discharge, discharge rate and ambient temperature. Each input utilises three membership functions.
  • the output of the model is a correction factor which also utilises three membership functions. This correction factor is applied to the Coup De Fouet parameters associated with the operating conditions to cancel their effect.
  • ANFIS Adaptive Neural Fuzzy Inference System
  • the overall structure of the estimation model is illustrated in Figure 1 2.
  • the model is implemented using Matlab's Simulink.
  • the inputs are fed into the fuzzy model which produces a correction factor.
  • This correction factor is added to the trough voltage corresponding to the inputs to eliminate the influence of the operating conditions.
  • a simple linear relation is used to scale the trough voltage to determine the capacity.
  • This summation and scaling activity is the hard computing aspect of the model.
  • soft computing techniques could also be used to replace this hard computing aspect.
  • the period of discharge necessary to establish information related to battery charge capacity by the method of the present invention is substantially less than the time taken for full discharge, and the loss of charge for the purpose of charge determination also is substantially less.
  • a short discharge test of not more than 1 0% of nominal capacity in discharge depth is found to be sufficient to reveal information related to the absolute or relative charge capacity of the battery.
  • a discharge of not more than 5% and more preferably not more than 1 % of nominal capacity may be employed.
  • the soft-computing component may be in another form such as a pattern recognition based model.
  • Soft computing may also

Abstract

A method of obtaining information relating to the charge capacity of one or more cells utilising information from the initial discharge period of the cell or cells. The method involves measuring a variable cell parameter for at least a part of an initial period of discharge during which the cell voltage initially decreases to a through voltage and then increases to a plateau voltage (the Coup De Fouet period), and relating the variable cell parameter to reference information to obtain the absolute or relative charge capacity of the cell or cells. An estimation model for predicting the absolute or relative capacity of a battery includes input for a variable battery parameter and one or more battery operating conditions and/or battery condition, reference information, compensation means determining a correction factor for the variable battery parameter, and calculation means relating corrected variable battery parameter to absolute or relative battery capacity.

Description

BATTERY CAPACITY MEASUREMENT
Field of the Invention
The invention relates to a method of obtaining information relating to the charge capacity of a battery. It relates in particular, although not exclusively, to a method of obtaining information relating to the charge capacity of a battery which is in a fully charged condition, without the need to fully discharge the battery.
Background to the Invention Existing battery capacity measurement approaches suffer one or more of the following disadvantages:
1 . Being off line approaches, so that continuity of monitoring is interrupted.
2. Requiring full discharge that leaves other equipment vulnerable and exposed to shutdown. 3. Requiring sophisticated and expensive testing equipment.
4. Requiring manual operation for performing the measurement.
5. Requiring special AC/DC converter rectification noise level similar to that available with UPS's.
6. Inaccuracy.
In consequence the existing battery capacity measurement techniques are either not acceptable to the telecommunications community because they leave a system vulnerable to failure, demand high cost, impose long delays between testing, require manual measurement procedure, or are not allowed due to telecommunications standards (as is the case with rectification noise levels).
A full discharge test into a stable load is recommended by industry and professional institutions as the only reliable approach for battery capacity measurement and is often referred to as the "capacity test" . This approach, however, suffers from substantial disadvantages including the requirement of bulky external loads, the need for backup power supplies, and the labour required to set up and supervise the procedure. Lately impedance/conductance techniques have become popular for obtaining estimates of battery capacity. These techniques require the use of specialised equipment. In addition there is some uncertainty surrounding their effectiveness with most of the researchers dealing with these techniques being reluctant to promote them as a replacement to the "capacity test" .
Due to the dependence of battery capacity on the operating parameters of temperature and discharge rate the accuracy of other existing techniques is not acceptable. Accumulation type techniques depend on an estimation of charging efficiency and require correction factors for different discharge temperatures and rates. In addition they are not tolerant to disruptions to their short term data history.
Curve fitting and parametric models are two other common approaches which also suffer from the requirement of correction factors for different discharge temperature and rates. Curve fitting models try to match the discharge voltage versus time curve to either an exponential parabolic or hyperbolic curve. Some models employ more complex hybrid approaches. The major disadvantage with these models is that for each combination of discharge conditions and battery type a parameter set is required. These parameter sets are obtained through an exhaustive series of discharge tests. Parametric models are based on internal battery parameters such as internal resistance. Models such as this estimate SOC (state of charge) or reserve time by redrawing the manufacturers discharge voltage time curves based on the change in internal resistance. Battery resistance, however, is not always supplied by the manufacturer and therefore must be measured.
The present invention seeks to provide a method by which at least some of the aforedescribed disadvantages are mitigated or overcome. It seeks to provide a method which at the least provides information concerning the capacity of one battery relative to that of another battery, and/or the capacity as influenced by the operating conditions and optionally additionally or alternatively information concerning the absolute or intrinsic charge capacity of a battery. Summary of the Invention
In its broadest aspect the invention provides a method of obtaining information relating to the charge capacity of one or more cells including: measuring a variable cell parameter, or change in a variable cell parameter, for at least a part of an initial period of discharge during which the cell voltage initially decreases to a trough voltage and then increases to a plateau voltage; and relating the variable cell parameter, or change in the variable cell parameter, to reference information to obtain the absolute or relative charge capacity of the cell or cells.
In a more particular aspect the invention provides a method of estimating the capacity of a battery including: acquiring reference information relating a variable battery parameter, or change in a variable battery parameter, to one or more operating conditions and/or battery condition; measuring the variable battery parameter, or change in the variable battery parameter, during at least part of an initial discharge period of the battery, during which the voltage initially decreases to a trough voltage and then increases to a plateau voltage; and relating the variable battery parameter, or change in variable battery parameter, to reference information to obtain an absolute or relative capacity of the battery.
Both electrodes contributes to the cell(s) voltage decrease to a trough voltage and then increase to a plateau voltage. The variable cell parameter may be measure with respect to a single electrode.
The invention envisages that preferably, but not exclusively, measurements are made of cell or electrode voltage, or change of voltage with time, for at least a part of the period of time during which the battery voltage initially decreases to a trough voltage and then increases to a plateau voltage. Typically, the initial period during which the battery output voltage initially decreases to a trough voltage and then increases to a plateau voltage is the Coup De Fouet period.
Preferably, the reference information is the relationship between one or more battery operating conditions and/or battery condition and the trough voltage or plateau voltage of the Coup De Fouet period. The operating conditions may be one or more of time on charge and/or depth of previous charge and/or float voltage and/or ambient temperature and/or discharge rate. Preferably the reference information is acquired when the battery is in the early stages of its operational life.
Preferably before discharge the battery is in a substantially fully charged condition.
Measurement of the variable battery parameter may occur when the battery is subjected an initial period of discharge (a discharge test) or when the battery begins to discharge when required to supply a load. Thus, when a battery begins to discharge into a load the discharge time remaining may be calculated. Alternatively, to determine remaining operational life of the battery it may be subjected to a discharge test.
The method may include use of discrimination means which compares a change of a measured or monitored variable parameter with a change which is compatible with that which occurs in the Coup De Fouet period of initial discharge and responds to whether or not that compatibility is present. Thus, typically the method of the invention comprises a search for the occurrence of the trough or plateau voltage, and measurement of that trough and/or plateau voltage from which capacity is determined using a parameterised relationship.
The invention is intended particularly for measurement of the capacity, or relative capacity, of a battery of a kind in which electrical discharge results in a chemical reaction that produces reaction discharge products. Such batteries typically exhibit the Coup De Fouet characteristic during initial discharge from a fully charged condition, with the voltage initially reducing to a trough voltage and then increasing to a plateau voltage from which it then decreases progressively as the battery is discharged. In particular this invention may be utilised in respect of electrochemical batteries where at least one of the electroactive components is in the liquid phase and therefore under diffusion control, such as a lead/acid battery where the sulphuric acid takes part in the discharge and recharge reactions. The invention may be applied to lead/acid type batteries and other batteries which are re-chargeable. However, use of the invention to measure the charge of batteries of a non- rechargeable type is not excluded.
The period of discharge necessary to establish information related to battery charge capacity by the method of the present invention is substantially less than the time taken for full discharge, and the loss of charge for the purpose of charge determination also is substantially less. A short discharge test of not more than 1 0% of nominal capacity in discharge depth is found to be sufficient to reveal information related to the absolute or relative charge capacity of the battery. A discharge of not more than 5 % and more preferably not more than 1 % of nominal capacity may be employed.
The invention envisages that preferably, but not exclusively, the function of one or more of the above steps is performed by a computer.
The invention further provides for an estimation model for predicting the absolute or relative capacity of a battery, including: input for a variable battery parameter, and one or more battery operating conditions and/or battery condition; reference information relating variable battery parameter to one or more battery operating conditions and/or battery condition; compensation means determining correction factor for variable battery parameter depending on value any one of battery operating conditions and/or battery condition; and calculation means relating corrected variable battery parameter to reference information to obtain the absolute or relative charge capacity of the battery.
The method may include use of training or learning means adapted to determine reference information relating a variable battery parameter to one or more battery operating conditions and/or battery condition; or to determine rules relating variable battery parameter, or change in variable battery parameter, to one or more battery operating conditions and/or battery condition. Preferably, training or learning means may be any one of an Adaptive Neural Fuzzy Interface System or an Adaptive Network, or other Neuro-Fuzzy or Soft Computing system. The estimation model may be in the form of computer readable code.
There is also provided an apparatus adapted to provide information relating to the charge capacity of a battery, including: measurement means adapted to measure a variable battery parameter, or change in variable battery parameter; and processing means adapted to relate the variable battery parameter, or change in variable battery parameter, to reference information to obtain the absolute or relative charge capacity of the battery.
Preferably, but not exclusively, the apparatus may measure voltage, or change of voltage, for at least part of an initial period of discharge of a battery during which the battery voltage initially decreases to a trough voltage and then increases to a plateau voltage; and may also measure one or more battery operating conditions.
Preferably, the apparatus includes a microprocessor adapted to manipulate a variable battery parameter, or change in variable battery parameter, and one or more battery operating conditions and/or battery condition and output an estimation of the absolute or relative charge capacity of the battery. The microprocessor may be adapted to output the discharge time remaining expressed in hours and fractions of an hour, and/or be adapted to output the remaining operational life of the battery. The output means may be graphical, numerical or otherwise.
Preferably, but not exclusively, the apparatus may further include a discharge means, the discharge means adapted to at least partially discharge a battery and measure the variable battery parameter, or change in variable battery parameter, for at least part of the partial discharge.
The apparatus may also include training or learning means adapted to determine rules relating a variable battery parameter, or change in a variable battery parameter, to one or more battery operating conditions and/or battery condition.
Further aspects of the invention will become apparent from the following description which is given by way of example only. Brief Description of the Drawings
The invention will now be described by way of example and with reference to the attached drawings in which:
FIGURES 1 a - 1d: illustrates the Coup De Fouet region during cell discharge;
FIGURES 2a - 2d: illustrates the shape of the Coup De Fouet for previous discharges to various depths; FIGURES 3a - 3d: illustrates the dependence of the Coup De Fouet on the time on charge; FIGURES 4a - 4b: illustrates the influence of float voltage on Coup De Fouet;
FIGURES 5a - 5b: illustrates the shape of the Coup De Fouet for various discharge rates; FIGURES 6a - 6b: illustrates the shape of the Coup De Fouet for various ambient temperatures; FIGURES 7a - 7b: illustrates the relation between Coup De Fouet and capacity for different discharge rates; FIGURES 8a - 8b: illustrates the relation between Coup De Fouet and capacity for different ambient temperatures; FIGURES 9a - 9d: illustrates the influence of accelerated thermal ageing on Coup De Fouet;
FIGURES 10a-10d: illustrates the influence of accelerated thermally and water replenishment on Coup De Fouet; FIGURE 1 1 : illustrates a fuzzy logic correction model employed for capacity estimation; FIGURE 12: illustrates a Coup De Fouet capacity estimation model;
FIGURES 13a-13b: illustrates the results of the capacity estimation model; TABLE 1 : Shows data for the original and post ageing capacity of cells; and
TABLE 2: Shows data for the original and post ageing weight of cells.
Description of the Preferred Examples
Examples of tests undertaken in accordance with and to verify the present invention will now be described. The Coup De Fouet is an electrochemical phenomenon. The invention is intended particularly for measurement of the capacity, or relative capacity, of a battery of a kind in which electrical discharge results in a chemical reaction that produces reaction discharge products. Such batteries typically exhibit the Coup De Fouet characteristic during initial discharge from a fully charged condition, with the voltage initially reducing to a trough voltage and then increasing to a plateau voltage from which it then decreases progressively as the battery is discharged. In particular this invention may be utilised in respect of electrochemical batteries where at least one of the electroactive components is in the liquid phase and therefore under diffusion control, such as a lead/acid battery where the sulphuric acid takes part in the discharge and recharge reactions. The invention may be applied to lead/acid type batteries and other batteries which are re-chargeable.
The voltage vs. time (hours:minutes:seconds:tenths of second) characteristic for the Coup De Fouet period of discharge of typical commercially available battery, the single cell Oldham type 2HI 275, is shown in Figure 1 a. During initial discharge from a fully charged condition the voltage drops quickly to a trough voltage and then increases to a peak, plateau voltage within about 4 to 5 minutes from initial discharge. The voltage then gradually reduces as the cell discharges.
Tests conducted using a mercurous-sulphate reference electrode have determined that both electrodes contribute to the Coup De Fouet. There is a significant contribution made by the negative electrode. Three situations are illustrated in figure 1 b to 1 d. In all cases the negative electrode appears as dominant as the positive electrode. Thus, the Coup De Fouet may be measured at one battery electrode with respect to a reference point.
The invention identifies that the level of the trough and plateau voltages during the Coup De Fouet period are influenced by the operating conditions and condition of the battery. Typical operating conditions which effect the Coup De Fouet are depth of previous discharge, time on float charge, float voltage, ambient temperature and discharge rate. The effect that each of these conditions has on Coup De Fouet is discussed in turn.
The depth of the previous discharge has an influence on the shape of the Coup De Fouet. Figures 2a to 2d illustrate consecutive discharges of an Oldham 2HI275 cell to various depths. The discharge rate was 100A and the ambient temperature was 20°C. After each discharge 1 10% of the charge released during the discharge was supplied to the cell and then it was charged for a further 24 hours. Under these operating conditions the cell is rated to release 1 77Ah of charge when discharged to a depth of 1 .85V. Figure 2a illustrates discharges to a depth of 1 % ( ~ 1 .8Ah) . Here the first discharge is normal with the voltage decreasing to the trough before recovering. The next discharge also decreased to the trough, however, the shape of the voltage profile has altered, being much flatter prior to the trough. The following discharges clearly show the establishment of what appears to be a second dip. This is evident in Figure 2b where the discharge is allowed to continue past the 1 % depth. A similar affect is observed for discharges up to a depth of approximately 1 2%. For discharge to a depth of greater than 1 2%, as illustrated in Figure 2c and 2d where the discharge depth is 1 2.5% and 1 00% respectively, the Coup De Fouet of consecutive discharges are very consistent.
Figures 3a to 3d illustrate the dependence of the Coup De Fouet on the time on charge. Figure 3a illustrates the Coup De Fouet region of consecutive discharges to a depth of 1 2.5% of an Oldham 2HI275 cell at a rate of 100A and ambient temperature of 20°C. Figure 3b illustrates the trough region in greater detail. It is apparent that the longer the cell is charged, the deeper the trough voltage is. This is clear from Figures 3c and 3d where the trough and plateau voltages are plotted against charge time respectively.
Due to the series connection of multiple cells it is not easy to maintain a uniform float voltage on each cell without the use of additional hardware known as equalisers. Equalisers are not common thus it is necessary to determine the influence of variations in float voltage. Figure 4a illustrates consecutive discharges of an Oldham cell to a depth of 1 2.5 % at a rate of 100A and ambient temperature of 20°C. Between each discharge the cell was recharge for a fixed period of 30 hours utilising float voltages of 2.22, 2.27 and 2.32V. The nominal float voltage for the operating conditions is 2.27V. Figure 4b illustrates the relation between the float voltage and the trough and plateau voltages. It is apparent that the lower the float voltage the lower the trough and plateau voltages.
Tests were conducted to establish the relationship between capacity and Coup De Fouet for different combinations of discharge rate and ambient temperature. The battery when configured as a 1 2 volt string and discharged at 100 amps over a period of about 2 hours. The discharge profiles of those cells during the initial Coup De Fouet period are summarised below.
Results of substantially full discharges obtained for six different discharge currents are shown in Figure 5a. The results for the Coup De Fouet period are shown in more detail by Figure 5b.
Figure 6a shows seven discharge voltages vs. time profiles for the cells when being discharged at different ambient temperatures. The results for the Coup De Fouet period are shown in more detail by Figure 6b.
The key results from these tests are shown in Figure 7a and 7b and Figure 8a and 8b. Figures 7a and 7b illustrate the relation between capacity due to the use of various discharge rates and the trough and plateau voltage parameters respectively. Figures 8a and 8b illustrate the relation between capacity due to the use of various ambient temperatures and the trough and plateau voltage parameters respectively. For both operating conditions and for both parameters (the trough and plateau voltage) the relations are close to linear. This examination of the voltage of the battery during the Coup De Fouet period may be used to conveniently provide information related to the battery capacity.
Determining the capacity due to operating conditions is helpful if prompt time remaining information is required at the start of a discharge. The ultimate aim, however, is to determine the capacity due to the condition of the battery alone and not the operating conditions. In order to facilitate this goal the effects of battery condition on the Coup De Fouet must be determined. Investigations were undertaken to determine the influence of battery condition on the Coup De Fouet due to two modes of battery degradation. The first mode is accelerated thermal ageing. The 5 second mode is the result of replenishing the water lost from the cells which had undergone the accelerated thermal ageing.
Accelerated ageing is commonly used to rate a battery's operational life. The experiment was conducted by charging four pairs of Oldham 2HI275 cells at the ι o nominal 20°C float voltage of 2.27V, and ambient temperature of 71 °C, for from 2 to 5 periods. Each period consisted of 1 3 days. A further pair of cells were charged under standard conditions (2.27V, 20°C ambient temperature). As a result, after discharging at a rate of 100A to an end voltage of 1 .85V, the cells exhibited capacities of between 1 0% and 1 23% of manufacturers rated capacity ( 1 77Ah) .
15
The original and post ageing capacities are given in Table 1 . The original capacity is given as a percentage related to the ten hour discharge to an end voltage of 1 .75V. The important point to note is the consistency of the cells original capacity and the variation in the cells capacity after ageing .
20
The cells were weighed prior to undergoing the accelerated ageing. After the accelerated ageing they were re-weighed with the resulting difference in weight giving an indication in the amount of water lost during the process. The pre and post ageing weights along with the weight differences are given in Table 2.
25
Figures 9a to 9d illustrate the effect of accelerated thermal ageing on the Coup De Fouet. Figure 9a illustrates the entire discharge voltage profiles of each pair of cells and Figure 9b illustrates a close up of the Coup De Fouet region of the discharges. Clearly the cells which have the lowest capacity have a lower Coup De Fouet (trough 30 and plateau voltages) . The relation between the capacity due to the degradation in battery condition with the trough and plateau voltages is illustrated in Figures 9c and 9d respectively. It can be seen here that in both cases the relation is close to linear. Using the information of Table 2 it was possible to replenish the water lost through the thermal ageing process. The cells were then re-charged and discharged. As a result of the addition of water much of the cells capacity was recovered, to be between 97 and 1 20% of rated capacity. The post water replenished capacities are given in Table 1 . Figures 1 0a to 10d illustrate the influence of water replenishment on Coup De Fouet. The improvement in capacity is clear from inspection of the discharge voltage profiles given in Figure 10a. Figure 10b illustrates a close up of the Coup De Fouet region reflecting a much greater consistency between the cells.
The relation between the capacity and the trough and plateau voltages is illustrated in Figures 10c and 10d respectively. It can be seen here that in both cases the relation is still close to linear, although not as consistent as the relations illustrated in Figures 9c and 9d.
Details presented above show a relation between operating conditions battery condition and the Coup De Fouet. Not all of the operating conditions have a corresponding affect on capacity (at least in the short term). If, however, the Coup De Fouet is to be employed in a capacity estimation scheme then the effect of all operating conditions on the Coup De Fouet must be eliminated. Thus any resulting variation in the Coup De Fouet will be solely attributed to variations in battery condition.
The above results show that the relations between operating conditions and the Coup De Fouet parameters are not random. In isolation simple equations can be derived to express these relations. However, in combination the relations become more complex. It is not, however, practical to exhaustively test every combination of operating and battery condition. In light of this the results presented above suggest a strong case for employing soft computing to formulate a capacity estimation model.
The knowledge gathered by conducting the above tests represents a baseline for the rules of this model. The following paragraphs present the structure of the model and the result of its application. The following discussion will consider only the trough voltage. The trough is targeted as it occurs close to the start of discharge. Thus, a discharge to the trough will result in minimal impact on the power system and battery life. It is also easy to detect due to the sudden voltage reversal. However, the discussion may be applied equally to the plateau voltage.
5 The knowledge of the relations between operating conditions and the trough voltage are contained within a fuzzy logic model. Such models are within the capabilities of the skilled addressee with one particular model, the Sugeno Fuzzy Model, being discussed by T. Takag and M. Sugeno in "Fuzzy Identification Systems and its Application to modelling and control", IEEE Trans, Systa, Man Cybern, Vol. 1 5, pp. ι o 1 1 6-1 32, 1 985; the contents of which is considered included in this specification as if it were individually set forth. The Sugeno Fuzzy Model is illustrated in Figure 1 1 . The fuzzy model has as inputs the operating conditions of time on charge, float voltage, depth of previous discharge, discharge rate and ambient temperature. Each input utilises three membership functions.
15
The output of the model is a correction factor which also utilises three membership functions. This correction factor is applied to the Coup De Fouet parameters associated with the operating conditions to cancel their effect.
20 To establish the rules and define the membership functions the fuzzy model was trained. In order to expedite this process an Adaptive Neural Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) was employed. Such systems are discussed in "Neuro-Fuzzy and Soft Computing, A Computational Approach to Learning and Machine Intelligence" , J.-S. R. Jang, C.-T. Sun, and E. Mizutani, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, USA, 1 997; and J. S.
25 R Jang, "ANFIS: Adaptive-Network-Based Fuzzy Inference System," IEEE Trans. Syst., Man Cybern., Vol. 23, pp.665-685, 1 993. The contents of both these documents are considered included in this specification as if they were individually set forth. The fuzzy logic Matlab™ toolbox supports this technique. Once the structure (number and type of membership functions) is selected the rules are
30 automatically created and the membership functions are tuned using neural networks.
The overall structure of the estimation model is illustrated in Figure 1 2. The model is implemented using Matlab's Simulink. The inputs are fed into the fuzzy model which produces a correction factor. This correction factor is added to the trough voltage corresponding to the inputs to eliminate the influence of the operating conditions. A simple linear relation is used to scale the trough voltage to determine the capacity. This summation and scaling activity is the hard computing aspect of the model. However, it is envisaged that soft computing techniques could also be used to replace this hard computing aspect.
Perhaps the most critical aspect of the model is its training. This should be done in the early stages of battery life while incurring minimal impact on the power system. The model of Figure 1 1 was trained using data obtained from tests where different operating conditions were used. These tests include those presented above. The capacity of the cells was normalised to that obtained when the cell was discharged at a rate of 1 00A and temperature of 20°C. This was determined to be 207Ah. The training of the linear scaling relation was performed by inspection, but as noted above could be implemented by soft computing techniques. The results of the training can be seen in Figure 1 3a. In the main the training error is less than plus or minus 10% .
Validation of the model was performed using the data obtained above concerning the influence of battery condition. The results can be seen in Figure 1 3b. For cells with very low capacity the error is quite large. This, however, is not as bad as it seems. The cells used have deteriorated to such an extent that even with such a large capacity estimation error the estimation is still informative of a deterioration in capacity. For cells with high to moderately low capacity the estimation is, in the main, between plus or minus 1 0%.
The period of discharge necessary to establish information related to battery charge capacity by the method of the present invention is substantially less than the time taken for full discharge, and the loss of charge for the purpose of charge determination also is substantially less. A short discharge test of not more than 1 0% of nominal capacity in discharge depth is found to be sufficient to reveal information related to the absolute or relative charge capacity of the battery. A discharge of not more than 5% and more preferably not more than 1 % of nominal capacity may be employed. Thus, utilisation of the Coup De Fouet provides a reliable procedure for charge capacity measurement without any requirement for deep discharge or fast sampling rate. It thus avoids many of the disadvantages inherent in conventional procedures.
5
Where in the foregoing description reference has been made to integers or elements having known equivalents, then such equivalents are herein included as if individually set forth.
ι o Particular examples of the invention have been described and it is envisaged that improvements and modifications can take place without departing from the scope of the appended claims. Thus, even though the results of the model presented are encouraging, its structure may change. The soft-computing component may be in another form such as a pattern recognition based model. Soft computing may also
15 be employed to derive the scaling parameters used in the hard computing component of the model.

Claims

1 . A method of obtaining information relating to the charge capacity of one or more cells including: measuring a variable cell parameter, or change in a variable cell parameter, for at least part of an initial period of discharge during which the cell(s) voltage initially decreases to a trough voltage and then increases to a plateau voltage; and relating the variable cell parameter, or change in the variable cell parameter, to reference information to obtain the absolute or relative charge capacity of the cell or cells.
2. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein both electrodes contributes to the cell voltage decrease to the trough voltage and then increase to the plateau voltage.
3. A method as claimed in claim 2 wherein the variable cell parameter is measured with respect to a single electrode.
4. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein measurements are made of cell or electrode voltage, or change of voltage, for at least part of the period of time during which the cell voltage initially decreases to the trough voltage and then increases to the plateau voltage.
5. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the period during which the cell voltage initially decreases to the trough voltage and then increases to the plateau voltage is a Coup De Fouet period.
6. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the reference information is the relationship between one or more cell operating conditions and/or cell condition and the level of the trough voltage or plateau voltage.
7. A method as claimed in claim 6 wherein the operating conditions are one or more of time on charge and/or depth of previous charge and/or float voltage and/or ambient temperature and/or discharge rate.
5 8. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein prior to the initial period of discharge the one or more cells are in a substantially fully charged condition.
9. A method as claimed in claim 1 further including discrimination means which compares a change of a measured or monitored parameter with a change ι o which is compatible with that which occurs in a Coup De Fouet period of initial discharge and responds to whether or not that compatibility is present.
10. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the step of measuring the variable battery parameter occurs when the battery is subjected to an initial period of
15 discharge or when the battery begins to discharge when required to supply a load.
1 1 . A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the period of discharge is not more than 10% of nominal capacity of the cell or cells.
20
1 2. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the period of discharge is not more than 1 % of nominal capacity of the cell or cells.
13. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the one or more cells is a battery.
25
14. A method as claimed in claim 1 3 wherein the battery is a lead/acid type battery or other battery which is rechargeable.
1 5. A method of estimating the capacity of a battery including: 30 acquiring reference information relating a variable battery parameter, or change in a variable battery parameter, to one or more battery operating conditions and/or battery condition; measuring the variable battery parameter, or change in the variable battery parameter, during at least part of an initial discharge period of the battery during which the voltage initially decreases to a trough voltage and then increases to a plateau voltage; and relating the variable battery parameter, or change in variable battery parameter, to reference information to obtain the absolute or relative charge capacity of the battery.
1 6. A method as claimed in claim 1 5 wherein measurements are made of voltage, or change of voltage, for at least part of the period of time during which the battery voltage initially decreases to the trough voltage and then increases to the plateau voltage.
1 7. A method as claimed in claim 1 5 wherein the period during which the battery voltage initially decreases to the trough voltage and then increases to the plateau voltage is a Coup De Fouet period.
1 8. A method as claimed in claim 1 5 wherein the reference information is the relationship between one or more battery operating conditions and/or battery condition and the trough voltage or plateau voltage.
1 9. A method as claimed in claim 1 8 wherein the operating conditions are one or more of time on charge and/or depth of previous charge and/or float voltage and/or ambient temperature and/or discharge rate.
20. A method as claimed in claim 1 5 wherein the step of acquiring the reference information occurs when the battery is in the early stages of its operational life.
21 . A method as claimed in claim 1 5 wherein the step of measuring the variable battery parameter occurs when the battery is subjected to an initial period of discharge or when the battery begins to discharge when required to supply a load.
22. A method as claimed in claim 1 5 wherein prior to the initial period of discharge the battery is in a substantially fully charged condition.
23. A method as claimed in claim 1 5 including a further step of calculating the discharge time remaining.
24. A method as claimed in claim 1 5 including a further step of calculating the remaining operational life of the battery.
25. A method as claimed in claim 1 5 further including discrimination means which compares a change of a measured or monitored variable parameter with a change which is compatible with that which occurs in a Coup De Fouet period of initial discharge and responds to whether or not that compatibility is present.
26. A method as claimed in claim 1 5 or claims 23 to 25 wherein the function of one or more of the steps is performed by a computer.
27. A method as claimed in claim 1 5 wherein the period of discharge is not more than 10% of nominal capacity of the battery.
28. A method as claimed in claim 1 5 wherein the period of discharge is not more than 1 % of nominal capacity of the battery.
29. A method as claimed in claim 1 5 wherein the battery is a lead/acid type battery or other battery which is rechargeable.
30. An estimation model for predicting the absolute or relative capacity of a battery, including: input for a variable battery parameter, and one or more battery operating conditions and/or battery condition; reference information relating the variable battery parameter to one or more battery operating conditions and/or battery condition; compensation means determining a correction factor for the variable battery parameter depending on the value of any one of battery operating 5 conditions and/or battery condition; and calculation means relating corrected variable battery parameter to reference information to obtain the absolute or relative charge capacity of the battery.
ι o 31 . An estimation model as claimed in claim 30 wherein the variable battery parameter is battery voltage, or change of battery voltage, measured during at least part of an initial discharge period, a Coup De Fouet period, during which the battery output voltage initially decreases to a trough voltage and then increases to a plateau voltage.
1 5
32. An estimation model as claimed in claim 30 including training or learning means adapted to determine reference information relating a variable battery parameter to one or more battery operating conditions and/or battery condition.
20
33. An estimation model as claimed in claim 30 including training or learning means adapted to determine rules relating the variable battery parameter, or change in variable battery parameter, to one or more battery operating conditions and/or battery condition.
25
34. An estimation model as claimed in claim 32 or claim 33 wherein training or learning means is an Adaptive Neural Fuzzy Interface System or Adaptive Network, or other Neuro-Fuzzy or Soft Computing system.
30 35. An estimation model as claimed in claim 30 wherein the battery operating conditions are one or more of time on charge and/or depth of previous charge and/or float voltage and/or ambient temperature and/or discharge rate.
36. An estimation model as claimed in claim 30 which is in the form of computer readable code.
37. An apparatus adapted to provide information relating to the charge capacity of 5 a battery, including: measurement means adapted to measure a variable battery parameter, or change in variable battery parameter; and processing means adapted to relate the variable battery parameter, or change in variable battery parameter, to referenced information to obtain the ι o absolute or relative charge capacity of the battery.
38. An apparatus as claimed in claim 37 further including discrimination means which compares a change of the measured variable battery parameter with a change which is compatible with that which occurs in a Coup De Fouet period
15 of initial discharge of the battery and response to whether or not compatibility is present.
39. An apparatus as claimed in claim 37 adapted to measure voltage, or change of voltage, for at least part of an initial period of discharge of the battery during
20 which the battery voltage initially decreases to a trough voltage and then increases to a plateau voltage.
40. An apparatus as claimed in claim 37 further adapted to measure one or more battery operating conditions.
25
41 . An apparatus as claimed in claim 40 wherein the operating conditions are one or more of time on charge and/or depth of previous charge and/or float voltage and/or ambient temperature and/or discharge rate.
30 42. An apparatus as claimed in claim 37 which includes a microprocessor adapted to manipulate a variable battery parameter, or change in variable battery parameter, and one or more battery operating conditions and/or battery condition and predict the absolute or relative charge capacity of the battery.
43. An apparatus as claimed in claim 42 wherein the microprocessor is adapted to output the discharge time remaining expressed in hours and fractions of an hour, and/or is adapted to output the remaining operational life of the battery.
5
44. An apparatus as claimed in claim 37 which further includes a discharge means, the discharge means adapted to at least partially discharge the battery.
45. An apparatus as claimed in claim 44 wherein the partial discharge is not more ι o than 1 0% of the nominal capacity of the battery.
46. An apparatus as claimed in claim 44 wherein the partial discharge is not more than 1 % of the nominal capacity of the battery.
15 47. An apparatus as claimed in claim 37 which further includes training or learning means adapted to determine rules relating a variable battery parameter, or change in a variable battery parameter, to one or more battery operating conditions and/or battery condition.
20 48. An apparatus as claimed in claim 47 wherein the training or learning means is an Adaptive Neural Fuzzy Interface System or Adaptive Network, or other Neuro-Fuzzy or Soft Computing System.
49. An apparatus as claimed in claim 37 which includes an output means adapted 25 to graphically, numerically or otherwise indicate, in real time, the charge capacity, discharge time remaining and/or remaining operational life of a battery.
50. A method of obtaining information relating to the charge capacity of one or 30 more cells as herein described with reference to the description and drawings.
51 . A method of estimating the capacity of a battery as herein described with reference to the description and drawings.
2. An estimation model for predicting the absolute or relative capacity of a battery as herein described with reference to the description and drawings.
PCT/NZ2000/000089 1999-06-03 2000-06-02 Battery capacity measurement WO2000075678A1 (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/979,906 US6924622B1 (en) 1999-06-03 2000-06-02 Battery capacity measurement
EP00931767A EP1188063A1 (en) 1999-06-03 2000-06-02 Battery capacity measurement
AU49597/00A AU4959700A (en) 1999-06-03 2000-06-02 Battery capacity measurement

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB9912778.9 1999-06-03
GB9912778A GB2350686B (en) 1999-06-03 1999-06-03 Battery capacity measurement

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2000075678A1 true WO2000075678A1 (en) 2000-12-14

Family

ID=10854582

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/NZ2000/000089 WO2000075678A1 (en) 1999-06-03 2000-06-02 Battery capacity measurement

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (1) US6924622B1 (en)
EP (1) EP1188063A1 (en)
AU (1) AU4959700A (en)
GB (1) GB2350686B (en)
WO (1) WO2000075678A1 (en)

Cited By (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8106632B2 (en) 2006-05-11 2012-01-31 Commissariat A L'energie Atomique Method for managing a bank of rechargeable batteries using the coup de fouet effect on charging
US8368357B2 (en) 2010-06-24 2013-02-05 Qnovo Inc. Method and circuitry to adaptively charge a battery/cell
US8638070B2 (en) 2010-05-21 2014-01-28 Qnovo Inc. Method and circuitry to adaptively charge a battery/cell
US8970178B2 (en) 2010-06-24 2015-03-03 Qnovo Inc. Method and circuitry to calculate the state of charge of a battery/cell
US9063018B1 (en) 2012-10-22 2015-06-23 Qnovo Inc. Method and circuitry to determine temperature and/or state of health of a battery/cell
US9142994B2 (en) 2012-09-25 2015-09-22 Qnovo, Inc. Method and circuitry to adaptively charge a battery/cell
US9461492B1 (en) 2013-04-19 2016-10-04 Qnovo Inc. Method and circuitry to adaptively charge a battery/cell using a charge-time parameter
US10067198B2 (en) 2010-05-21 2018-09-04 Qnovo Inc. Method and circuitry to adaptively charge a battery/cell using the state of health thereof
CN110048444A (en) * 2019-05-31 2019-07-23 闽江学院 A kind of lead-acid battery fuzzy control method based on SOC state estimation
US10389156B2 (en) 2010-05-21 2019-08-20 Qnovo Inc. Method and circuitry to adaptively charge a battery/cell
US10574079B1 (en) 2014-06-20 2020-02-25 Qnovo Inc. Wireless charging techniques and circuitry for a battery
CN113125982A (en) * 2019-12-31 2021-07-16 比亚迪股份有限公司 Battery life prediction method and device
US11397215B2 (en) 2010-05-21 2022-07-26 Qnovo Inc. Battery adaptive charging using battery physical phenomena
US11397216B2 (en) 2010-05-21 2022-07-26 Qnovo Inc. Battery adaptive charging using a battery model
US11791647B2 (en) 2010-05-21 2023-10-17 Qnovo Inc. Method and circuitry to adaptively charge a battery/cell

Families Citing this family (23)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE10231700B4 (en) * 2002-07-13 2006-06-14 Vb Autobatterie Gmbh & Co. Kgaa Method for determining the aging state of a storage battery with regard to the removable amount of charge and monitoring device
JP3935099B2 (en) * 2003-04-15 2007-06-20 株式会社デンソー Internal state detection system for power storage device for vehicle
FR2871624B1 (en) * 2004-06-14 2006-11-17 Commissariat Energie Atomique METHOD FOR MANAGING A PARK OF RECHARGEABLE BATTERIES
JP4501946B2 (en) * 2007-02-23 2010-07-14 日本電気株式会社 Control program for disk array device and disk controller
CN101067644B (en) * 2007-04-20 2010-05-26 杭州高特电子设备有限公司 Storage battery performance analytical expert diagnosing method
US20090228225A1 (en) 2008-03-04 2009-09-10 Eaton Corporation Battery Service Life Estimation Methods, Apparatus and Computer Program Products Using State Estimation Techniques Initialized Using a Regression Model
US9397502B2 (en) 2009-03-02 2016-07-19 Volterra Semiconductor LLC System and method for proportioned power distribution in power converter arrays
US10283974B2 (en) 2009-03-02 2019-05-07 Volterra Semiconductor LLC Systems and methods for intelligent, adaptive management of energy storage packs
US8407018B2 (en) * 2009-03-24 2013-03-26 American Power Conversion Corporation Battery life estimation
JP5624333B2 (en) * 2009-03-31 2014-11-12 プライムアースEvエナジー株式会社 Secondary battery control device and map correction method
CN102472803B (en) * 2010-03-05 2014-05-14 松下电器产业株式会社 Full charge capacity value correction circuit, battery pack, and charging system
US9537332B2 (en) 2013-05-30 2017-01-03 Canara, Inc. Apparatus, system and method for charge balancing of individual batteries in a string of batteries using battery voltage and temperature, and detecting and preventing thermal runaway
RU2551702C2 (en) * 2013-07-09 2015-05-27 Закрытое акционерное общество Инженерная фирма "Орион-ХИТ" Lithium current source testing method
DE102013220688A1 (en) * 2013-10-14 2015-04-16 Robert Bosch Gmbh Method and device for determining a charge state-dependent open circuit voltage profile of a vehicle battery
US9983266B2 (en) 2015-03-30 2018-05-29 Eaton Intelligent Power Limited Apparatus and methods for battery monitoring using discharge pulse measurements
US10120034B2 (en) 2015-10-07 2018-11-06 Canara, Inc. Battery string monitoring system
FR3075395B1 (en) * 2017-12-19 2020-11-20 Commissariat Energie Atomique METHOD OF DETERMINING THE MAXIMUM DISCHARGE CURRENT APPLICABLE TO A LITHIUM-ION CELL AT A GIVEN TEMPERATURE
FR3075396B1 (en) * 2017-12-19 2019-12-27 Commissariat A L'energie Atomique Et Aux Energies Alternatives METHOD FOR DETERMINING A SEQUENCE OF DISCHARGE CURRENT APPLICABLE TO A LITHIUM-ION CELL AT A GIVEN TEMPERATURE
CN109991550B (en) * 2017-12-28 2022-07-05 中国电信股份有限公司 Storage battery performance detection method, device, system and computer readable storage medium
CN111123129B (en) * 2019-12-24 2021-12-28 天能电池集团股份有限公司 Lead storage battery capacity detection method
US11422601B2 (en) * 2020-02-27 2022-08-23 Dell Products, L.P. Methods and systems for advanced battery charge capacity forecasting
TWI758760B (en) * 2020-06-24 2022-03-21 仁寶電腦工業股份有限公司 Battery control device and battery capacity estimation method
CN115561641B (en) * 2022-11-14 2023-03-14 中南大学 Lithium battery state of charge estimation method, device and medium based on state observer

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5130659A (en) * 1990-08-21 1992-07-14 Sloan Jeffrey M Battery Monitor

Family Cites Families (25)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CH607344A5 (en) * 1977-01-21 1978-12-15 Etic Electronic Time Co
US4180770A (en) * 1978-03-01 1979-12-25 Anderson Power Products, Inc. Method and apparatus for determining the capacity of lead acid storage batteries
JPH01167966A (en) * 1987-12-23 1989-07-03 Japan Storage Battery Co Ltd Charging condition detecting method for lead cell
US4876513A (en) 1988-12-05 1989-10-24 Globe-Union Inc. Dynamic state-of-charge indicator for a battery and method thereof
US4952862A (en) 1989-09-29 1990-08-28 At&T Bell Laboratories Apparatus and method for adaptively predicting battery discharge reserve time
US5371682A (en) 1993-02-04 1994-12-06 At&T Corp. Method and apparatus for predicting battery reserve time to a specified end-voltage
FR2708746B1 (en) 1993-08-06 1995-09-01 Thomson Csf Method for evaluating the charge remaining in a storage battery.
EP0690557B1 (en) * 1994-07-01 1996-10-09 STMicroelectronics S.r.l. Fuzzy logic control process and device for induction motors
US5633573A (en) 1994-11-10 1997-05-27 Duracell, Inc. Battery pack having a processor controlled battery operating system
US5619417A (en) 1994-11-23 1997-04-08 Chrysler Corporation Battery monitoring system for an electric vehicle
US5631540A (en) 1994-11-23 1997-05-20 Lucent Technologies Inc. Method and apparatus for predicting the remaining capacity and reserve time of a battery on discharge
US5670861A (en) 1995-01-17 1997-09-23 Norvik Tractions Inc. Battery energy monitoring circuits
JPH08289407A (en) * 1995-02-13 1996-11-01 Nippon Soken Inc Power generation control device for hybrid vehicle
US5587924A (en) 1995-03-31 1996-12-24 Compaq Computer Corporation Automatic system for handling batteries
KR960038646A (en) * 1995-04-17 1996-11-21 구자홍 Fuzzy Law Generation Method and Apparatus for Neural Network System
FR2734061B1 (en) 1995-05-12 1997-06-20 Thomson Csf METHOD FOR DETERMINING THE AVAILABLE CHARGE OF AN ACCUMULATOR BATTERY AT THE END OF DISCHARGE
FR2740555A1 (en) * 1995-10-31 1997-04-30 Philips Electronique Lab SYSTEM FOR MONITORING THE CHARGING-DISCHARGE CYCLES OF A RECHARGEABLE BATTERY, AND HOST DEVICE PROVIDED WITH AN INTELLIGENT BATTERY
US6064180A (en) 1996-10-29 2000-05-16 General Motors Corporation Method and apparatus for determining battery state-of-charge using neural network architecture
JPH10167966A (en) * 1996-12-03 1998-06-23 Nippon Chemiphar Co Ltd Oral sustained release preparation
AU738680B2 (en) 1997-01-21 2001-09-27 Metrixx Limited Signalling system
US6456988B1 (en) 1997-03-12 2002-09-24 U.S. Nanocorp Inc. Method for determining state-of-health using an intelligent system
US6104967A (en) 1997-07-25 2000-08-15 3M Innovative Properties Company Fault-tolerant battery system employing intra-battery network architecture
AU724902B2 (en) 1997-11-20 2000-10-05 Encore 2000 Limited Battery monitoring system
AUPP110497A0 (en) 1997-12-23 1998-01-22 Telstra Corporation Limited Electrical parameter monitoring system
US6255801B1 (en) 2000-05-10 2001-07-03 Tyco Electronics Logistics Ag System and method for assessing a capacity of a battery and power plant incorporating the same

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5130659A (en) * 1990-08-21 1992-07-14 Sloan Jeffrey M Battery Monitor

Non-Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
ANBUKY A H ET AL: "VRLA battery capacity measurement and discharge reserve time prediction", INTELEC - TWENTIETH INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ENERGY CONFERENCE (CAT. NO.98CH36263), PROCEEDINGS OF INTELEC '98 INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ENERGY CONFERENCE, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, USA, 4-8 OCT. 1998, 1999, Piscataway, NJ, USA, IEEE, USA, pages 302 - 310, XP002148505, ISBN: 0-7803-5069-3 *
KONYA Y T ET AL: "A DETERIORATION ESTIMATING SYSTEM FOR 200-AH SEALED LEAD-ACID BATTERIES", PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCE (INTELEC),US,NEW YORK, IEEE, vol. CONF. 16, 30 October 1994 (1994-10-30), pages 256 - 262, XP000623339, ISBN: 0-7803-2035-2 *
PASCOE P E ET AL: "ESTIMATION OF VRLA BATTERY CAPACITY USING THE ANALYSIS OF THE COUP DE FOUET REGION", INTELEC. INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ENERGY CONFERENCE,US,NEW YORK, NY: IEEE, 6 June 1999 (1999-06-06), pages 6 - 1-01-09, XP000868410, ISBN: 0-7803-5625-X *

Cited By (32)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8106632B2 (en) 2006-05-11 2012-01-31 Commissariat A L'energie Atomique Method for managing a bank of rechargeable batteries using the coup de fouet effect on charging
US9385555B2 (en) 2010-05-21 2016-07-05 Qnovo Inc. Method and circuitry to determine the relaxation time of a battery/cell
US11397215B2 (en) 2010-05-21 2022-07-26 Qnovo Inc. Battery adaptive charging using battery physical phenomena
US10389156B2 (en) 2010-05-21 2019-08-20 Qnovo Inc. Method and circuitry to adaptively charge a battery/cell
US8638070B2 (en) 2010-05-21 2014-01-28 Qnovo Inc. Method and circuitry to adaptively charge a battery/cell
US11397216B2 (en) 2010-05-21 2022-07-26 Qnovo Inc. Battery adaptive charging using a battery model
US11063459B2 (en) 2010-05-21 2021-07-13 Qnovo Inc. Method and circuitry to adaptively charge a battery/cell
US8975874B2 (en) 2010-05-21 2015-03-10 Qnovo Inc. Method and circuitry to adaptively charge a battery/cell
US10067198B2 (en) 2010-05-21 2018-09-04 Qnovo Inc. Method and circuitry to adaptively charge a battery/cell using the state of health thereof
US11728525B2 (en) 2010-05-21 2023-08-15 Qnovo Inc. Battery adaptive charging
US11791647B2 (en) 2010-05-21 2023-10-17 Qnovo Inc. Method and circuitry to adaptively charge a battery/cell
US9373972B2 (en) 2010-05-21 2016-06-21 Qnovo Inc. Method and circuitry to determine the relaxation time of a battery/cell
US8970178B2 (en) 2010-06-24 2015-03-03 Qnovo Inc. Method and circuitry to calculate the state of charge of a battery/cell
US9121910B2 (en) 2010-06-24 2015-09-01 Qnovo Inc. Method and circuitry to adaptively charge a battery/cell using the state of health thereof
US9791513B2 (en) 2010-06-24 2017-10-17 Qnovo Inc. Method and circuitry to adjust, correct and/or compensate an SOC of a battery based on relaxation time thereof
US9035621B2 (en) 2010-06-24 2015-05-19 Qnovo Inc. Method and circuitry to calculate the state of charge of a battery/cell
US8791669B2 (en) 2010-06-24 2014-07-29 Qnovo Inc. Method and circuitry to calculate the state of charge of a battery/cell
US8427112B2 (en) 2010-06-24 2013-04-23 Qnovo Inc. Method and circuitry to calculate the state of charge of a battery/cell
US8368357B2 (en) 2010-06-24 2013-02-05 Qnovo Inc. Method and circuitry to adaptively charge a battery/cell
US9702940B2 (en) 2011-02-04 2017-07-11 Qnovo Inc. Method and circuitry to calculate the state of charge of a battery/cell
US10128678B2 (en) 2011-02-04 2018-11-13 Qnovo Inc. Method and circuitry to adaptively charge a battery/cell
US9142994B2 (en) 2012-09-25 2015-09-22 Qnovo, Inc. Method and circuitry to adaptively charge a battery/cell
US9787122B2 (en) 2012-09-25 2017-10-10 Qnovo Inc. Method and circuitry to adaptively charge a battery/cell
US9063018B1 (en) 2012-10-22 2015-06-23 Qnovo Inc. Method and circuitry to determine temperature and/or state of health of a battery/cell
US9726554B1 (en) 2012-10-22 2017-08-08 Qnovo Inc. Method and circuitry to determine temperature and/or state of health of a battery/cell
US10447055B1 (en) 2013-04-19 2019-10-15 Qnovo Inc. Method and circuitry to adaptively charge a battery/cell using a charge-time parameter
US9461492B1 (en) 2013-04-19 2016-10-04 Qnovo Inc. Method and circuitry to adaptively charge a battery/cell using a charge-time parameter
US10574079B1 (en) 2014-06-20 2020-02-25 Qnovo Inc. Wireless charging techniques and circuitry for a battery
CN110048444B (en) * 2019-05-31 2020-07-31 闽江学院 Lead-acid battery fuzzy control method based on SOC state estimation
CN110048444A (en) * 2019-05-31 2019-07-23 闽江学院 A kind of lead-acid battery fuzzy control method based on SOC state estimation
CN113125982A (en) * 2019-12-31 2021-07-16 比亚迪股份有限公司 Battery life prediction method and device
CN113125982B (en) * 2019-12-31 2022-10-18 比亚迪股份有限公司 Battery life prediction method and device

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB2350686A8 (en) 2004-04-28
GB2350686B (en) 2004-01-07
GB2350686A (en) 2000-12-06
GB9912778D0 (en) 1999-08-04
US6924622B1 (en) 2005-08-02
EP1188063A1 (en) 2002-03-20
AU4959700A (en) 2000-12-28

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6924622B1 (en) Battery capacity measurement
EP2411824B1 (en) Battery life estimation
US6469471B1 (en) Battery charge measurement and discharge reserve time prediction technique and apparatus
JP5058814B2 (en) Battery state and parameter estimation system and method
JP3121732B2 (en) Secondary battery parameter measurement method, secondary battery charge / discharge control method and life prediction method using the same, secondary battery charge / discharge control device, and power storage device using the same
EP1688754B1 (en) Battery management apparatus
US20230052544A1 (en) Method and apparatus for detecting lithium plating, and method and apparatus for obtaining polarization proportion
US6392415B2 (en) Method for determining the state of charge of lead-acid rechargeable batteries
EP3772657A1 (en) Device and method for performing a state of health estimation
JP2007309839A (en) Battery pack condition measuring device, degradation of battery pack discrimination method and program for the same
JP2007311255A (en) Battery pack status measuring device, battery pack deterioration determining method, and battery pack deterioration determining program
WO2020198118A1 (en) Methods, systems, and devices for estimating and predicting a remaining time to charge and a remaining time to discharge of a battery
JP3641367B2 (en) Alkaline battery capacity remaining amount estimation method and capacity estimation device
US20120109557A1 (en) Method for calibrating an electrochemical battery
WO2020246558A1 (en) Battery control device
KR20190041360A (en) Method and apparatus for estimating state of health of battery
KR100878123B1 (en) Method and system for battery state and parameter estimation
EP3605123A1 (en) Storage battery control device and control method
JP2006107988A (en) Apparatus and method for detecting charge capacity
Zhang A new method for lithium-ion battery's SOH estimation and RUL prediction
EP4083641A1 (en) Semiconductor device and method of monitoring battery remaining capacity
EP4354164A1 (en) Battery abnormality detecting device, and battery abnormality detecting method
JP7240893B2 (en) battery controller
EP4287453A1 (en) Power storage control apparatus for determining remaining charge time and computing method thereof
KR20230130238A (en) Battery state estimation method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY CA CH CN CR CU CZ CZ DE DE DK DK DM DZ EE EE ES FI FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SK SL TJ TM TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VN YU ZA ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 09979906

Country of ref document: US

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2000931767

Country of ref document: EP

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 2000931767

Country of ref document: EP

REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: 8642

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Ref document number: 2000931767

Country of ref document: EP

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: JP