WO2001028307A2 - Evaluation system for equipment vendors - Google Patents

Evaluation system for equipment vendors Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2001028307A2
WO2001028307A2 PCT/IB2000/002013 IB0002013W WO0128307A2 WO 2001028307 A2 WO2001028307 A2 WO 2001028307A2 IB 0002013 W IB0002013 W IB 0002013W WO 0128307 A2 WO0128307 A2 WO 0128307A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
order
design
points
evaluation
members
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/IB2000/002013
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO2001028307A3 (en
Inventor
Kazuyuki Mabuchi
Natsuki Takahashi
Yukiko Sato
Original Assignee
Otis Elevator Company
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Otis Elevator Company filed Critical Otis Elevator Company
Priority to US10/110,944 priority Critical patent/US7020616B1/en
Priority to KR1020027004473A priority patent/KR100736304B1/en
Priority to EP00988983A priority patent/EP1368712A4/en
Publication of WO2001028307A2 publication Critical patent/WO2001028307A2/en
Publication of WO2001028307A3 publication Critical patent/WO2001028307A3/en

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00—Commerce
    • G06Q30/02—Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
    • G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00—Commerce
    • G06Q30/02—Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
    • G06Q30/0283—Price estimation or determination
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00—Systems or methods specially adapted for specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/08—Construction

Definitions

  • This invention pertains to an evaluation system for equipment vendors, such as vendors of elevators and escalators.
  • Elevators and escalators are installed in buildings, apartments, hospitals, plants, airports, railway stations, etc.
  • the developer of the building sends a design order for the building to a construction design office.
  • the construction design office then sends the design order for the elevator to an elevator equipment manufacturer.
  • the manufacturer then prepares detailed cost estimations and design drawings.
  • the construction company or the general contractor uses the design drawings to integrate the elevator or escalator into the design of the building. At the appropriate time, manufacture, delivery and installation of the equipment is completed.
  • the developer 11 sends the order to one or several design offices 12 selected from a plurality of design offices.
  • Each design office then sub-contracts with one or several manufacturers 14 selected from plurality of manufacturers to perform design work, either directly or through an agent 13.
  • the general contractor 15 then performs the construction based on the order 16 from the developer and the design drawings 17,18 received from the design office 12 and manufacturer 14.
  • fabrication of the elevator equipment is performed by the manufacturer, and the manufacturer in charge of design may be different from the manufacturer in charge of construction.
  • the steps in the detailed procedure of the business of the manufacturer for elevator equipment include discussion (schematic discussion on contract, technical aid, etc.), estimation (preparation of estimation book, etc.), order receiving (determination of the final specifications, shipment time, etc.), contract order (publication of management book, order book, etc.), manufacturing and installation (approval of drawings, procedure, manufacturing, etc.), shipment (checking, transfer, etc.), recovery and payment (publication of request, warranty, etc.).
  • steps include design order, design, and construction for elevator equipment.
  • the business activity has to be carried out based on the design and construction results that have been agreed, and cooperation between the design office and agent is needed.
  • the design office and agent in order to coordinate the fabrication and installation of the elevator equipment appropriately, among the many manufacturers, it is necessary to evaluate and select manufacturers that can perform reliably and can provide highly reliable design/service business support.
  • the purpose of this invention is to provide an evaluation system for elevator equipment vendors which can support cooperation between many design offices and agents and can provide the design office with information for evaluating and selecting an appropriate manufacturer.
  • This invention provides an evaluation system for vendors of elevator equipment and services, which accumulates points for each member based on such member's performance in evaluating appropriately a design order for elevator equipment and/or the construction order of the designed project (elevator equipment).
  • an evaluation system for elevator equipment vendors includes a bank registering processing means which receives information from the aforementioned design offices or agents as members and, when there is a design order for elevator equipment by any member, accumulates the points for that member in a data base for a registration corresponding to the scale of the design order for the elevator equipment by the member; an order receiving registering means, which, when there is an order placed by a member for construction of a project that has been designed, accumulates points for that member in the data base corresponding to the scale of the construction order of the project by the member; a result determination processing means, which regularly reviews the points added/registered to the aforementioned data base for each member and determines an evaluation result for each member; and a result information generating means, which sends the aforementioned evaluation results to said members and which transfers the results to managers of elevator equipment manufacturers .
  • Figure 1 is a structural diagram illustrating the evaluation system according to the present invention.
  • Figure 2 is a diagram illustrating a typical design/construction relationship for elevator equipment.
  • Figure 1 is a diagram illustrating the evaluation system for equipment vendors in an embodiment of this invention. The portion defined by the broken line is the function block.
  • the system 1 for elevator equipment vendor evaluation has a data base 2 and software functional blocks 3-6.
  • the data base and functional blocks may be programmed in a stand-alone computer or included as one of many functions provided by an Internet website, portal or remote application provider.
  • Data base 2 is a relational data base or an object-oriented data base.
  • design offices 7,8,9 are registered as the system's members. Also, the managers in charge of the design orders in the offices may be registered as individual members of the system. For these members, the information regarding the placing of a design order of the elevator equipment is collected from the specifications, etc. by the bank registering processing unit 3 and is registered in data base 2.
  • the design order information may include the date of sending of the order, the address and name of the member, as well as points corresponding to the complexity and size of the order.
  • the design order points can be awarded, for example, as follows: for each design unit, each meter of the lift distance or running distance is taken as a point. Also, for unit points, it is preferred that the difference in the floor area of the elevator or escalator be taken into consideration, and the difference between a high-speed elevator and low-speed elevator be also taken into consideration, that is, the difference in the type and performance of the elevator equipment are included as factors related to points.
  • the design order information that has been processed for registration in the system is stored as points for each member, and the sum of the points is also accumulated.
  • an evaluation coefficient such as two times the design order point number, is generated corresponding to the aforementioned lift distance or the like, and an evaluation coefficient operation command is executed based on the decision order points of the corresponding members 7,8,9.
  • the actual order points thus generated are accumulated in the data base 2 for each member.
  • result determination processing unit 5 on a regular basis, the points that have been added up and registered in data base 2 are retrieved for each member, and determination is made on whether a predetermined threshold level has been exceeded. If it is determined that the point level for a member 7,8,9 has been exceeded for a certain step by said result determination processing unit 5, result information generating unit 6 generates the evaluation result information of the member. This result information is sent to the member, and may also be published as, the privilege points of the member. Also, the result information is sent as evaluation result information of the member to the staff of the manufacturer 10 in charge of the business.
  • the calculation of points is not limited to fixed parameters corresponding to the lift distance or the like, and they may also include bonus points based on scheduling success or objective customer evaluations.
  • the processing function in processing units (3) and (4) may be modified to reflect the change.
  • the system when there is a design order for elevator equipment or an order for a design project by a member, the system accumulates a point total for each member, and a notice transmitted when the accumulated points overrun a threshold value, is generated.
  • This information is sent to the member, and to the manager of the manufacturer, in charge of the order.
  • the manager of the manufacturer in charge of the order obtains information that can allow appropriate evaluation of designs and construction results that have been carried out, and the information can be used in the business in cooperation with the design office or agent.
  • the staff of the design office or agent can get information for evaluating and selecting a manufacturer which can perform business appropriately and can support the design and service business with high reliability.

Abstract

The evaluation system (1) registers equipment and service vendors, such as design offices, etc. as members (7, 8, 9), and registers design requests and construction requests for elevators according to project performance parameters for each member. The system (1) accumulates points in a data base (2) for each member. The points are periodically evaluated (5) and an evaluation result is generated and sent (6) to its member. Members use its evaluation result to improve performance and select future vendors.

Description

EVALUATION SYSTEM FOR EQUIPMENT VENDORS
Field of the Invention Technical field of the invention
This invention pertains to an evaluation system for equipment vendors, such as vendors of elevators and escalators.
Background
Elevators and escalators are installed in buildings, apartments, hospitals, plants, airports, railway stations, etc. For design of such elevator equipment, the developer of the building sends a design order for the building to a construction design office. The construction design office then sends the design order for the elevator to an elevator equipment manufacturer. The manufacturer then prepares detailed cost estimations and design drawings. After the manufacturer receives the order and signs the contract, the construction company or the general contractor uses the design drawings to integrate the elevator or escalator into the design of the building. At the appropriate time, manufacture, delivery and installation of the equipment is completed.
As shown in Figure 2, for the relationship among the design office 12, construction company 15 and manufacturer for elevator equipment 14, the developer 11 sends the order to one or several design offices 12 selected from a plurality of design offices. Each design office then sub-contracts with one or several manufacturers 14 selected from plurality of manufacturers to perform design work, either directly or through an agent 13. The general contractor 15 then performs the construction based on the order 16 from the developer and the design drawings 17,18 received from the design office 12 and manufacturer 14. Also, fabrication of the elevator equipment is performed by the manufacturer, and the manufacturer in charge of design may be different from the manufacturer in charge of construction.
The steps in the detailed procedure of the business of the manufacturer for elevator equipment include discussion (schematic discussion on contract, technical aid, etc.), estimation (preparation of estimation book, etc.), order receiving (determination of the final specifications, shipment time, etc.), contract order (publication of management book, order book, etc.), manufacturing and installation (approval of drawings, procedure, manufacturing, etc.), shipment (checking, transfer, etc.), recovery and payment (publication of request, warranty, etc.).
As explained in the above, for the business of manufacturers for elevator equipment, it is necessary to perform these steps smoothly. Such steps include design order, design, and construction for elevator equipment. In particular, in each step of operation, the business activity has to be carried out based on the design and construction results that have been agreed, and cooperation between the design office and agent is needed. On the side of the design office and agent, in order to coordinate the fabrication and installation of the elevator equipment appropriately, among the many manufacturers, it is necessary to evaluate and select manufacturers that can perform reliably and can provide highly reliable design/service business support.
The purpose of this invention is to provide an evaluation system for elevator equipment vendors which can support cooperation between many design offices and agents and can provide the design office with information for evaluating and selecting an appropriate manufacturer.
Disclosure of the Invention This invention provides an evaluation system for vendors of elevator equipment and services, which accumulates points for each member based on such member's performance in evaluating appropriately a design order for elevator equipment and/or the construction order of the designed project (elevator equipment).
According to its preferred embodiment of the invention, an evaluation system for elevator equipment vendors is provided. The system includes a bank registering processing means which receives information from the aforementioned design offices or agents as members and, when there is a design order for elevator equipment by any member, accumulates the points for that member in a data base for a registration corresponding to the scale of the design order for the elevator equipment by the member; an order receiving registering means, which, when there is an order placed by a member for construction of a project that has been designed, accumulates points for that member in the data base corresponding to the scale of the construction order of the project by the member; a result determination processing means, which regularly reviews the points added/registered to the aforementioned data base for each member and determines an evaluation result for each member; and a result information generating means, which sends the aforementioned evaluation results to said members and which transfers the results to managers of elevator equipment manufacturers .
Brief Description of the Drawings
Figure 1 is a structural diagram illustrating the evaluation system according to the present invention. Figure 2 is a diagram illustrating a typical design/construction relationship for elevator equipment.
Best Mode for Carrying Out the Invention
Figure 1 is a diagram illustrating the evaluation system for equipment vendors in an embodiment of this invention. The portion defined by the broken line is the function block.
The system 1 for elevator equipment vendor evaluation has a data base 2 and software functional blocks 3-6. The data base and functional blocks may be programmed in a stand-alone computer or included as one of many functions provided by an Internet website, portal or remote application provider. Data base 2 is a relational data base or an object-oriented data base.
For bank registering processing unit 3, design offices 7,8,9 (including agents) are registered as the system's members. Also, the managers in charge of the design orders in the offices may be registered as individual members of the system. For these members, the information regarding the placing of a design order of the elevator equipment is collected from the specifications, etc. by the bank registering processing unit 3 and is registered in data base 2.
The design order information may include the date of sending of the order, the address and name of the member, as well as points corresponding to the complexity and size of the order. The design order points can be awarded, for example, as follows: for each design unit, each meter of the lift distance or running distance is taken as a point. Also, for unit points, it is preferred that the difference in the floor area of the elevator or escalator be taken into consideration, and the difference between a high-speed elevator and low-speed elevator be also taken into consideration, that is, the difference in the type and performance of the elevator equipment are included as factors related to points. In the data base 2, the design order information that has been processed for registration in the system is stored as points for each member, and the sum of the points is also accumulated.
In the order receiving registration processing unit 4, after placement of a firm order for actual construction of the elevator equipment, an evaluation coefficient, such as two times the design order point number, is generated corresponding to the aforementioned lift distance or the like, and an evaluation coefficient operation command is executed based on the decision order points of the corresponding members 7,8,9. The actual order points thus generated are accumulated in the data base 2 for each member. In result determination processing unit 5, on a regular basis, the points that have been added up and registered in data base 2 are retrieved for each member, and determination is made on whether a predetermined threshold level has been exceeded. If it is determined that the point level for a member 7,8,9 has been exceeded for a certain step by said result determination processing unit 5, result information generating unit 6 generates the evaluation result information of the member. This result information is sent to the member, and may also be published as, the privilege points of the member. Also, the result information is sent as evaluation result information of the member to the staff of the manufacturer 10 in charge of the business.
Also, the calculation of points is not limited to fixed parameters corresponding to the lift distance or the like, and they may also include bonus points based on scheduling success or objective customer evaluations. When the degree or period of evaluation are changed appropriately, the processing function in processing units (3) and (4) may be modified to reflect the change.
Consequently, for the evaluation system according to the present invention, when there is a design order for elevator equipment or an order for a design project by a member, the system accumulates a point total for each member, and a notice transmitted when the accumulated points overrun a threshold value, is generated. This information is sent to the member, and to the manager of the manufacturer, in charge of the order. In this way, the manager of the manufacturer in charge of the order obtains information that can allow appropriate evaluation of designs and construction results that have been carried out, and the information can be used in the business in cooperation with the design office or agent. Also, based on the results achieved, the staff of the design office or agent can get information for evaluating and selecting a manufacturer which can perform business appropriately and can support the design and service business with high reliability. As explained in the above, according to this invention, for each member, it is possible to add up and register result points pertaining to a design order of elevator equipment and a construction order of a project that has been designed. Consequently, it can provide information that can support the business with cooperation between many design offices and agents, and can enable evaluation and selection of an appropriate manufacturer for the design office.

Claims

Claim:
1. An evaluation system for equipment vendors characterized in that: the system includes means for processing design order information for equipment received from at least one design office or agent and construction order information for projects that have been designed; wherein the system further includes a bank registering processing means (3), wherein said design office or agent is registered as a member (7,8,9) and, when there is a design order for elevator equipment by a member, accumulates points for said member in a data base (2) corresponding to the scale of the design order for the elevator equipment by the member; order receiving registration processing means, wherein, when there is a firm order by a member for construction of a project that has been designed, actual order points for the member are generated and stored in the data base (2) corresponding to the scale of the construction order of the proj ect by the member; a result determination processing means (5), which regularly reviews the points accumulated in the data base (2) for each member and generates an evaluation result for each member; and a result information generating means (6), which sends the evaluation results to said members (7,8,9) and which sends the results to equipment manufacturers (10).
2. A vendor evaluation method utilizing the system according to claim 1, said method comprising the steps of: receiving design order information relating to the members, accumulating points for said member corresponding to the scale of the design order; accumulating points for said member corresponding to the scale of the construction order; regularly reviewing the accumulated points for each member and generating an evaluation result; and sending the evaluation results to the members.
3. A method for evaluating equipment vendors, characterized in that said method includes the steps of: receiving design order information relating to the members, accumulating points for said member corresponding to the scale of the design order; accumulating points for said member corresponding to the scale of the construction order; regularly reviewing the accumulated points for each member and generating an evaluation result; and sending the evaluation results to the members.
4. The system as recited in claim 1 , further characterized in that the result determination processing means further comprises: means for comparing the points accumulated in the data base for each member with a predetermined threshold level.
PCT/IB2000/002013 1999-09-24 2000-10-18 Evaluation system for equipment vendors WO2001028307A2 (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/110,944 US7020616B1 (en) 1999-09-24 2000-10-18 Evaluation system for equipment vendors
KR1020027004473A KR100736304B1 (en) 1999-09-24 2000-10-18 Evaluation system for equipment vendors
EP00988983A EP1368712A4 (en) 1999-09-24 2000-10-18 Evaluation system for equipment vendors

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP26970099A JP2001097642A (en) 1999-09-24 1999-09-24 Bank system of elevating equipment
JP11/269700 1999-10-18

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2001028307A2 true WO2001028307A2 (en) 2001-04-26
WO2001028307A3 WO2001028307A3 (en) 2002-09-12

Family

ID=17475981

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/IB2000/002013 WO2001028307A2 (en) 1999-09-24 2000-10-18 Evaluation system for equipment vendors

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (1) US7020616B1 (en)
EP (1) EP1368712A4 (en)
JP (1) JP2001097642A (en)
KR (1) KR100736304B1 (en)
CN (1) CN1452757A (en)
WO (1) WO2001028307A2 (en)

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7778864B2 (en) * 2002-12-16 2010-08-17 Oracle International Corporation System and method for identifying sourcing event metrics for analyzing a supplier
US7996327B2 (en) * 2007-09-28 2011-08-09 Diversey, Inc. Product efficiency calculator system and method
US20110087613A1 (en) * 2009-10-08 2011-04-14 Evendor Check, Inc. System and Method for Evaluating Supplier Quality
US20130060659A1 (en) * 2011-09-02 2013-03-07 Oracle International Corporation System and method for splitting collaboration on event metrics for a supplier to respond to based on functional role
US20150025941A1 (en) * 2013-07-16 2015-01-22 Bureau Veritas Methods and systems for managing product test order tracking, reporting, and product disposition

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5311438A (en) * 1992-01-31 1994-05-10 Andersen Consulting Integrated manufacturing system
US5576965A (en) * 1992-04-16 1996-11-19 Hitachi, Ltd. Method and apparatus for aiding of designing process

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH08263537A (en) * 1995-03-24 1996-10-11 Hitachi Building Syst Eng & Service Co Ltd Design specification inspection system for elevator cage
US6110213A (en) * 1997-11-06 2000-08-29 Vlt Coporation Fabrication rules based automated design and manufacturing system and method
US6301574B1 (en) * 1998-11-06 2001-10-09 Efirms.Com, Inc. System for providing business information
US6295513B1 (en) * 1999-03-16 2001-09-25 Eagle Engineering Of America, Inc. Network-based system for the manufacture of parts with a virtual collaborative environment for design, developement, and fabricator selection
US6446053B1 (en) * 1999-08-06 2002-09-03 Michael Elliott Computer-implemented method and system for producing a proposal for a construction project

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5311438A (en) * 1992-01-31 1994-05-10 Andersen Consulting Integrated manufacturing system
US5576965A (en) * 1992-04-16 1996-11-19 Hitachi, Ltd. Method and apparatus for aiding of designing process

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See also references of EP1368712A2 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP1368712A2 (en) 2003-12-10
JP2001097642A (en) 2001-04-10
WO2001028307A3 (en) 2002-09-12
KR20030031464A (en) 2003-04-21
KR100736304B1 (en) 2007-07-06
EP1368712A4 (en) 2005-12-28
US7020616B1 (en) 2006-03-28
CN1452757A (en) 2003-10-29

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6952680B1 (en) Apparatus and method for tracking and managing physical assets
US7369968B2 (en) Enterprise energy management system
US20050131729A1 (en) Apparatus and method for tracking and managing physical assets
US7062446B1 (en) Apparatus and method for tracking and managing physical assets
US7152035B1 (en) Apparatus and method for tracking and managing physical assets
US9639812B1 (en) System and method for accommodating disrupted travelers
US20090099897A1 (en) System and method for managing mobile asset workload
US20020173970A1 (en) Support system for maintenance contract of elevator
RU2282894C2 (en) System for controlling local events in multiple buildings
Blumberg Strategies for improving field service operations productivity and quality
JP2002230196A (en) Maintenance contract support system for elevator
US7020616B1 (en) Evaluation system for equipment vendors
JP2008009496A (en) Maintenance service operation system and maintenance service operation method
KR100927346B1 (en) Automated device maintenance system and automated device maintenance method using the same
CN100373875C (en) Utilization method and system within a communication network
JP2002352026A (en) Method, system, and program for product repair
JP7117272B2 (en) Maintenance support system and method
US20050055262A1 (en) System and a method for distributing assignments and receiving report data
JP4819212B2 (en) Facility management system
KR102471034B1 (en) Home repair service system, server and method
Ng et al. Assessing lift maintenance performance of high-rise residential buildings
JP4614598B2 (en) Rental system and method
JP7213786B2 (en) Elevator operation diagnosis device and elevator operation diagnosis system
JP7455907B2 (en) Information processing device, method for controlling the information processing device, and control program for the information processing device
KR20010000697A (en) Community Build Facility Management System Using Network

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): CN KR US

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1020027004473

Country of ref document: KR

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2000988983

Country of ref document: EP

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 10110944

Country of ref document: US

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 008195994

Country of ref document: CN

AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): CN KR US

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 1020027004473

Country of ref document: KR

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 2000988983

Country of ref document: EP

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Ref document number: 2000988983

Country of ref document: EP