WO2001056388A2 - Annotating semantic ontologies - Google Patents

Annotating semantic ontologies Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2001056388A2
WO2001056388A2 PCT/US2001/003670 US0103670W WO0156388A2 WO 2001056388 A2 WO2001056388 A2 WO 2001056388A2 US 0103670 W US0103670 W US 0103670W WO 0156388 A2 WO0156388 A2 WO 0156388A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
concept
ontology
document
datum
information
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2001/003670
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO2001056388A3 (en
WO2001056388A9 (en
Inventor
Jay Edward Mork
Maria Jeanne Phipps
Michael Emmett Murphy
Original Assignee
General Dynamics Information Systems, Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by General Dynamics Information Systems, Inc. filed Critical General Dynamics Information Systems, Inc.
Priority to AU2001234819A priority Critical patent/AU2001234819A1/en
Publication of WO2001056388A2 publication Critical patent/WO2001056388A2/en
Publication of WO2001056388A3 publication Critical patent/WO2001056388A3/en
Publication of WO2001056388A9 publication Critical patent/WO2001056388A9/en

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F40/00Handling natural language data
    • G06F40/10Text processing
    • G06F40/166Editing, e.g. inserting or deleting
    • G06F40/169Annotation, e.g. comment data or footnotes

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to methods and devices for creating, managing, and sharing information. More particularly, the present invention relates to a software tool for creating, managing, and sharing information by applying semantic ontologies to bodies of information.
  • a semantic ontology is a system in which concepts are described using a standard set of attributes, or a standard lexicon.
  • a concept is described in terms of the semantic ontology by annotating the concept with attributes from the standard lexicon that are related by their meanings to the concept.
  • the attributes not only describe the foreground information associated with the concept, but also the background information including the knowledge of what information is to be included in the foreground information and how that information is obtained. Since the attributes describe the what and how of the concept, the background information is captured in the attributes and not lost.
  • the semantic ontology in this example might include the attributes "distance,” "time” and “measure.”
  • speed could be expressed in terms of the attributes by saying, "speed is the measurement of the distance a vehicle travels in one hour.” Therefore, the ontology communicates what information is necessary to calculate speed, and how to obtain that information.
  • Semantic ontology provides a system in which a user organizes information into concepts. Those concepts are then described using a standard lexicon of attributes describing the concepts. The attributes describe the concepts in terms of the knowledge required to create the concept, including what information is necessary to express the concept and how that information is to be attained. In this manner, semantic ontology preserves the knowledge that is associated with a particular concept.
  • the present invention provides a system for implementing semantic ontology in a way that avoids the obstacles previously associated with semantic ontology. The invention has several advantages over the prior art.
  • the present invention provides a sof ware tool that automates the process of semantic ontology. Automating the process significantly decreases the time required to process a document according to a semantic ontology, which increases the likelihood that creators will be willing to annotate their documents.
  • the present invention provides a software tool that is integrated into software applications that already are used to create documents. Therefore, document creators can simultaneously create their documents and process them according to the semantic ontology by cutting and pasting within a single application.
  • the present invention provides a software tool that can assist document creators with creating new documents. The system can recommend to users what information to include in a document and can automatically attain and insert the information into the document. Alternatively, the system can describe how to attain the information. Document creators are more likely to contribute to the ontology by processing their documents according to the ontology because the system provides a benefit in that it assists document creators in creating new documents.
  • an apparatus that has a memory for storing at least one ontology, a display for displaying the electronic document, means for selecting at least one datum within the document, means for annotating the datum with at least one concept contained in the ontology, and a memory for storing the annotated datum.
  • the stored ontology includes at least one concept or at least one process, and preferably includes one or more concepts and processes. Each concept and process can include a plurality of attributes.
  • An apparatus in accordance with the present invention also can create at least a portion of an electronic document.
  • the apparatus can include a memory for storing at least one ontology including at least one concept, means for selecting a concept from the stored ontology, means for copying the selected concept into the document, means for inputting information relating to the selected concept into the document, and a display for displaying the document.
  • the memory preferably stores a plurality of ontologies.
  • the apparatus can further include a means for selecting an ontology from the plurality of ontologies.
  • the ontology also can have at least one process for obtaining information and a means for selecting a process from the ontology.
  • the apparatus can have a means for obtaining information as requested by a selected process.
  • the stored concept can include a plurality of concept attributes and the stored processes can include a plurality of process attributes.
  • the present invention also involves a method for annotating an electronic document.
  • the method includes the steps of providing an ontology having at least one concept, providing a body of information in electronic form, identifying at least one datum within the body of information, matching the datum with at least one concept contained within the ontology, annotating the datum with the at least one concept, and storing in a memory the annotated datum.
  • the system can store in an electronic form the datum, and the concept and the connection between them.
  • the method also can include the steps of identifying at least one attribute from the standard lexicon that describes the datum, annotating the datum with the attributes selected from the datum, storing in an electronic storage mechanism the datum annotated with at least one concept and at least one identified attribute.
  • the ontology used has at least one concept and a standard lexicon of attributes to describe the concept.
  • the system preferably uses multiple ontologies, each ontology having at least one concept and a standard lexicon of attributes to describe the concept.
  • the annotating step can include annotating the datum using a mark up language, and can further include the step of selecting the concept from a menu of terms electronically displayed, and storing the concept in the form of a mark up language.
  • the system also can create at least a portion of a document by selecting an ontology, selecting a concept from a menu of concepts belonging to the selected ontology, copying the selected concept to the document, and inputting information relating to the concept into the document.
  • the selected concept can include attributes related to the concept.
  • the user also can select a process from a menu of processes that can include attributes related to the processes. The selected processes can be used to obtain .information relating to the selected concept and automatically input the information relating to the concept into the document.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a system in accordance with the present invention
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a screen display from a system using the present invention
  • FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of a second screen display for a system using the present invention.
  • FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of a third screen display for a system using the present invention.
  • FIG. 1 An apparatus for processing information according to the present invention is shown in FIG. 1.
  • the system includes a software tool 5 and an ontology server 20.
  • Software tool 5 is an application that can be launched as an applet within existing software applications 10.
  • Existing software applications 10 can include applications for creating documents.
  • the system can be used in conjunction with MicrosoftTM WordTM,
  • Software tool 5 can be utilized to serve either of two objectives. First, software tool 5 can be launched within an existing document created in one of existing software applications 10 to process existing data contained in a document. Each datum can be, for example, any length of text, numerical information, a picture, a chart or any other type of recordable intelligence. Second, software tool 5 can be launched within a blank or existing document created in one of the existing software applications 10 to generate new information to be inputted into the blank or existing document. As shown in FIG. 2, software tool 5 can be launched, e ⁇ , by clicking on an icon 14 on a tool bar of software application 10 displayed to the user, e.g., an a CRT screen display. Clicking on the icon can allow the user to "pull down" a menu 8.
  • Menu 8 presents a series of options to the user.
  • "Search Ontologies" option 6 permits a user of the system to search existing ontologies.
  • Existing ontologies preferably are stored on ontology server 20.
  • option 6 When option 6 is selected, existing ontologies are recalled from ontology server 20. Recalled existing ontologies are displayed to the user.
  • Each existing ontology recalled from ontology server 20 includes a listing of concepts 25, and preferably processes 30, with which the ontology is associated.
  • Each concept 25 or process 30 included in an existing ontology includes a list of attributes 35 that describe each concept 25 or process 30. Attributes 35 that describe concept 25 describe what type of 5 information is relevant to concept 25, and why that particular information is relevant to concept
  • Attributes 35 that describe processes 30 describe where information that is relevant to process 30 is to be found and how such information can be attained.
  • Software tool 5 may be launched to process existing data in a document.
  • Existing data may be selected in a document using a keyboard, mouse or similar pointing device.
  • the saving step saves each amiotated datum, i.e., the datum, the related concept or process and the fact of the connection between the datum and the concept or process.
  • "Create New Ontology” option 9 allows a user to create an entirely new ontology.
  • a new ontology is created by defining the concepts and processes, and the attributes of the concepts and processes for the ontology.
  • the new ontology is then stored in ontology server 20, and becomes an existing ontology.
  • software tool 5 can use the attributes 35 associated with any included processes 30 to obtain data to be included in the document according to concepts
  • Attributes 35 associated with processes 20 provide instructions to the user's computer to search specific databases for the required data. The user's computer could then inport that data into the document. For example, if the concept 25 was an automobile's top speed, a process 35 could instruct the user's computer to access a database that contains the vehicle specifications including the vehicle's top speed. The user's computer would then inport the data into the document where top speed is addressed.
  • Relationships are created by selecting two related concepts 25, two related processes 30 or a related concept 25 and a related process 30 by clicking on each of them in a graphical window.
  • Software tool 5 then launches relationship display window 50 shown in FIG. 4.
  • Relationship display window 50 lists operators 55 that describe possible relationships between the selected concepts 25 or processes 30. For example, in FIG. 4, the user has selected two concepts between which to create a relationship. The user can select an operator 55 that describes the appropriate relationship between the two selected concepts.
  • software tool 5 translates the selected concepts 25 and processes 30 and corresponding operator 55 into a markup language, such as DAML.
  • a markup language is capable of being processed and stored in binary format in a computer memory.
  • the present system overcomes many of the obstacles that previously had existed and prevented practical implementation of semantic ontologies to process information.
  • the system allows for the automated annotation of documents using electronically stored ontologies.
  • the system also allows users to create and edit ontologies.
  • the system can make recommendations to an author regarding the types of information that should be included in a given type of document.
  • the system can automatically generate documents based on the stored ontologies, by knowing the what and the how that go into making that type of document.
  • the system is easy to use because it can be integrated with existing software applications with which users already are familiar.

Abstract

A system allows a user to annotate documents by connecting any type of information in the document to concepts (25) and/or processes (30) making up a semantic ontology (18). The annotated information can be stored and accessed later to facilitate creation of new documents of a similar type. The system can use the information from the ontologies (18) to automatically generate new documents by knowing what type of information to include and how to get the information. The system also allows users to create and edit ontologies (18). The system is user friendly in that it can be integrated with existing software applications with which users already are familiar.

Description

APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR CPvEATING. MANAGING AND SHARING INFORMATION
Background of the Invention
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to methods and devices for creating, managing, and sharing information. More particularly, the present invention relates to a software tool for creating, managing, and sharing information by applying semantic ontologies to bodies of information.
2. Description of the Related Art
Anyone who creates a document, such as a presentation, report, brief, paper, article or any other form of communication spends considerable time and energy in deciding what information to include in the document and how to obtain that information. For example, a business executive might create a business report that will be used to educate other business personnel. In creating the report, the executive must make several decisions. Among these decisions, executive must decide what information is available to include in the report, what information to include in the report, and how to obtain that information. The process of deciding the what and how is the background effort that goes into creating the finished product - the report. While this decision-making process represents a large share of the effort required to make the report, the decision-making process is not apparent from the finished product. Rather, this decision-making process lies below the surface of the finished report. Although the report can be shared with others, only the executive possesses the knowledge of the what and how. Anyone wishing to create a similar report in the future will have to expend the same effort as the executive had in deciding the what and the how because the what and how remain the executive's unexpressed effort and knowledge.
Therefore, a method for capturing concepts, or the what and the how, is needed to prevent losing the knowledge behind reports. One approach to solving this problem is to develop semantic ontologies. A semantic ontology is a system in which concepts are described using a standard set of attributes, or a standard lexicon. A concept is described in terms of the semantic ontology by annotating the concept with attributes from the standard lexicon that are related by their meanings to the concept. The attributes not only describe the foreground information associated with the concept, but also the background information including the knowledge of what information is to be included in the foreground information and how that information is obtained. Since the attributes describe the what and how of the concept, the background information is captured in the attributes and not lost. For example, a specification sheet for an automobile might contain the following information: "TOP SPEED = 120 mph." Another person may be interested in creating a similar specification sheet for another automobile. If the person is not familiar with the concept of "speed" the person may not understand how to determine the vehicle's "top speed." What is missing is the additional information that explains what information is necessary to calculate top speed and how to obtain that information. This missing information could be communicated through a semantic ontology. The semantic ontology in this example might include the attributes "distance," "time" and "measure." According to the ontology, speed could be expressed in terms of the attributes by saying, "speed is the measurement of the distance a vehicle travels in one hour." Therefore, the ontology communicates what information is necessary to calculate speed, and how to obtain that information.
Although semantic ontologies theoretically provide a means for communicating the what and how in documents, there have heretofore been several obstacles to their practical implementation. Ontologically annotating a document is a tedious, time consuming process. A document only can be annotated by the individual creating the document because only that individual possess the knowledge of the what and how. To annotate a document, the individual first must determine whether the individual has access to any pre-existing suitable semantic ontology. Most individuals would not have access to any such ontology. Therefore, the individual must create a semantic ontology that is appropriate for the subject matter of the document. After creating the ontology, the individual must identify relevant data within the document. Finally, the individual must annotate each datum with attributes from the ontology.
These steps amount to a substantial effort on the part of the author. In most cases, individuals do not have the extra time required to annotate a document after it already has been created, much less create a suitable semantic ontology. In addition, the creator has little incentive to annotate the document because the annotation is primarily for the benefit of others - the creator already knows the what and the how. Therefore, ontological processing is a tedious task with little reward for the creator of the document. Another obstacle to implementing semantic ontologies is that there are no applications that allow authors to simultaneously create and ontologically annotate documents. Because the annotation is not performed in conjunction with the creation of the document, there is less incentive to annotate the document and a greater risk that the user will never annotate the document.
Therefore, it would be desirable to have a system to overcome the obstacles associated with implementing semantic ontologies to process information. It would be a significant advantage if such system automated the process of ontologically annotating documents. It also would be desirable to have such a system that could be integrated with existing applications already used by authors to create documents. Such a system would capitalize on existing training, making it more likely that people would use the system successfully. Such a system would reduce or eliminate the loss of knowledge, increase the ability for people to share knowledge and reduce the time for people to create new documents of the same type as previously annotated documents. It would be another significant advantage if the system were developed to facilitate creating documents using a database of captured concepts.
Summary of the Invention Semantic ontology provides a system in which a user organizes information into concepts. Those concepts are then described using a standard lexicon of attributes describing the concepts. The attributes describe the concepts in terms of the knowledge required to create the concept, including what information is necessary to express the concept and how that information is to be attained. In this manner, semantic ontology preserves the knowledge that is associated with a particular concept. The present invention provides a system for implementing semantic ontology in a way that avoids the obstacles previously associated with semantic ontology. The invention has several advantages over the prior art.
First, the present invention provides a sof ware tool that automates the process of semantic ontology. Automating the process significantly decreases the time required to process a document according to a semantic ontology, which increases the likelihood that creators will be willing to annotate their documents. Second, the present invention provides a software tool that is integrated into software applications that already are used to create documents. Therefore, document creators can simultaneously create their documents and process them according to the semantic ontology by cutting and pasting within a single application. Third, the present invention provides a software tool that can assist document creators with creating new documents. The system can recommend to users what information to include in a document and can automatically attain and insert the information into the document. Alternatively, the system can describe how to attain the information. Document creators are more likely to contribute to the ontology by processing their documents according to the ontology because the system provides a benefit in that it assists document creators in creating new documents.
These advantages are provided by an apparatus according to the present invention that has a memory for storing at least one ontology, a display for displaying the electronic document, means for selecting at least one datum within the document, means for annotating the datum with at least one concept contained in the ontology, and a memory for storing the annotated datum. The stored ontology includes at least one concept or at least one process, and preferably includes one or more concepts and processes. Each concept and process can include a plurality of attributes.
An apparatus in accordance with the present invention also can create at least a portion of an electronic document. The apparatus can include a memory for storing at least one ontology including at least one concept, means for selecting a concept from the stored ontology, means for copying the selected concept into the document, means for inputting information relating to the selected concept into the document, and a display for displaying the document. The memory preferably stores a plurality of ontologies. The apparatus can further include a means for selecting an ontology from the plurality of ontologies. The ontology also can have at least one process for obtaining information and a means for selecting a process from the ontology. The apparatus can have a means for obtaining information as requested by a selected process. The stored concept can include a plurality of concept attributes and the stored processes can include a plurality of process attributes. The present invention also involves a method for annotating an electronic document. The method includes the steps of providing an ontology having at least one concept, providing a body of information in electronic form, identifying at least one datum within the body of information, matching the datum with at least one concept contained within the ontology, annotating the datum with the at least one concept, and storing in a memory the annotated datum. The system can store in an electronic form the datum, and the concept and the connection between them. The method also can include the steps of identifying at least one attribute from the standard lexicon that describes the datum, annotating the datum with the attributes selected from the datum, storing in an electronic storage mechanism the datum annotated with at least one concept and at least one identified attribute. The ontology used has at least one concept and a standard lexicon of attributes to describe the concept. The system preferably uses multiple ontologies, each ontology having at least one concept and a standard lexicon of attributes to describe the concept. The annotating step can include annotating the datum using a mark up language, and can further include the step of selecting the concept from a menu of terms electronically displayed, and storing the concept in the form of a mark up language. This method can be repeated for additional data in the document and storing the annotated data in the electronic storage mechanism. The system also can create at least a portion of a document by selecting an ontology, selecting a concept from a menu of concepts belonging to the selected ontology, copying the selected concept to the document, and inputting information relating to the concept into the document. The selected concept can include attributes related to the concept. The user also can select a process from a menu of processes that can include attributes related to the processes. The selected processes can be used to obtain .information relating to the selected concept and automatically input the information relating to the concept into the document.
Brief Description of the Drawings
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a system in accordance with the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a screen display from a system using the present invention;
FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of a second screen display for a system using the present invention; and
FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of a third screen display for a system using the present invention.
Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiment
Referring to the figures, an apparatus for processing information according to the present invention is shown in FIG. 1. The system includes a software tool 5 and an ontology server 20. Software tool 5 is an application that can be launched as an applet within existing software applications 10. Existing software applications 10 can include applications for creating documents. For example, the system can be used in conjunction with Microsoft™ Word™,
Excel™, Access™ and PowerPoint™ software.
Software tool 5 can be utilized to serve either of two objectives. First, software tool 5 can be launched within an existing document created in one of existing software applications 10 to process existing data contained in a document. Each datum can be, for example, any length of text, numerical information, a picture, a chart or any other type of recordable intelligence. Second, software tool 5 can be launched within a blank or existing document created in one of the existing software applications 10 to generate new information to be inputted into the blank or existing document. As shown in FIG. 2, software tool 5 can be launched, e^, by clicking on an icon 14 on a tool bar of software application 10 displayed to the user, e.g., an a CRT screen display. Clicking on the icon can allow the user to "pull down" a menu 8.
Menu 8 presents a series of options to the user. "Search Ontologies" option 6 permits a user of the system to search existing ontologies. Existing ontologies preferably are stored on ontology server 20. When option 6 is selected, existing ontologies are recalled from ontology server 20. Recalled existing ontologies are displayed to the user. Each existing ontology recalled from ontology server 20 includes a listing of concepts 25, and preferably processes 30, with which the ontology is associated. Each concept 25 or process 30 included in an existing ontology includes a list of attributes 35 that describe each concept 25 or process 30. Attributes 35 that describe concept 25 describe what type of 5 information is relevant to concept 25, and why that particular information is relevant to concept
25. Attributes 35 that describe processes 30 describe where information that is relevant to process 30 is to be found and how such information can be attained.
Software tool 5 may be launched to process existing data in a document. Existing data may be selected in a document using a keyboard, mouse or similar pointing device.
10 "Search Ontologies" option 6 is used to annotate existing data within the document, preferably using an existing ontology and its associated concepts 25 and processes 30. After an existing ontology is found that matches information already contained in the document, then that existing ontology may be selected using a computer keyboard, mouse or similar pointing device. After the existing ontology is selected, a listing of concepts 25 and processes 30 that are related to the
15 existing ontology are displayed on graphical window 18, as shown in FIG. 3. Concepts 25 and processes 30 can be found that match data in the existing document. A concept 25 or process 30 can be selected by clicking on the concept or process in graphical window 18, or using a mouse or similar computer pointing device to drag concept 25 or process 30 onto the matching data to be processed within the existing document. This annotates the data with the concept or process
20. information. When the user is finished annotating all the desired data in the document, the user can save the document to an electronic memory. The saving step saves each amiotated datum, i.e., the datum, the related concept or process and the fact of the connection between the datum and the concept or process.
"Edit An Ontology" option 7 allows a user to edit an existing ontology if desired
15 by the user because, e^ ., an existing ontology cannot be found to match precisely the information already contained in the document. "Edit An Ontology" option 7 allows the user to add or delete concepts 25 or processes 30 to an existing ontology. "Edit An Ontology" option 7 also allows the user to add or delete attributes 35 to concepts 25 or processes 30. The edited ontology is then stored in ontology server 20, and becomes part of the existing ontologies.
10 "Create New Ontology" option 9 allows a user to create an entirely new ontology. A new ontology is created by defining the concepts and processes, and the attributes of the concepts and processes for the ontology. The new ontology is then stored in ontology server 20, and becomes an existing ontology.
If software tool 5 is launched to generate new information to include in a document, the user can use "Search Ontologies" option 6 to search for existing ontologies that would match the subject of the document. When an existing ontology is found to match the subject of the document to be created, selecting that existing ontology will allow the user to view concepts 25 and processes 30 to include in the document. "Document Recommend" option 11 allows the user to create a document by selecting an existing ontology and one or more concepts 25 or processes 30. Software tool 5 would then compare the selected concepts 25 and processes 30 with the concepts 25 and processes 30 in other documents created by other users in that ontology context and recommend other concepts 25 and processes 30 to accompany the already selected concepts 25 and processes 30 in the document being created.
After the user has selected an existing ontology and related concepts 25 and processes 20 to include in the document, software tool 5 can use the attributes 35 associated with any included processes 30 to obtain data to be included in the document according to concepts
25. Attributes 35 associated with processes 20 provide instructions to the user's computer to search specific databases for the required data. The user's computer could then inport that data into the document. For example, if the concept 25 was an automobile's top speed, a process 35 could instruct the user's computer to access a database that contains the vehicle specifications including the vehicle's top speed. The user's computer would then inport the data into the document where top speed is addressed.
After the data in the document is annotated with selected concepts 25 and processes 30, the user can use software tool 5 to create relationships between concepts 25 and processes 30. Relationships are created by selecting two related concepts 25, two related processes 30 or a related concept 25 and a related process 30 by clicking on each of them in a graphical window. Software tool 5 then launches relationship display window 50 shown in FIG. 4. Relationship display window 50 lists operators 55 that describe possible relationships between the selected concepts 25 or processes 30. For example, in FIG. 4, the user has selected two concepts between which to create a relationship. The user can select an operator 55 that describes the appropriate relationship between the two selected concepts. After the relationship is selected, software tool 5 translates the selected concepts 25 and processes 30 and corresponding operator 55 into a markup language, such as DAML. A markup language is capable of being processed and stored in binary format in a computer memory.
Therefore, the present system overcomes many of the obstacles that previously had existed and prevented practical implementation of semantic ontologies to process information. The system allows for the automated annotation of documents using electronically stored ontologies. The system also allows users to create and edit ontologies. The system can make recommendations to an author regarding the types of information that should be included in a given type of document. Finally, the system can automatically generate documents based on the stored ontologies, by knowing the what and the how that go into making that type of document. The system is easy to use because it can be integrated with existing software applications with which users already are familiar.
Whereas the present invention has been described with respect to specific embodiments thereof, it will be understood that various changes and modifications will be suggested to one skilled in the art and it is intended that the invention encompass such changes and modifications as fall within the scope of the appended claims.

Claims

What is claimed is:
1. An apparatus for annotating an electronic document, comprising: a storage mechanism for storing at least one ontology, said ontology including at least one concept; a display for displaying the electronic document; means for selecting at least one datum within the document; means for annotating the datum with at least one concept contained in the ontology; and a memory for storing the annotated datum.
2. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein said stored ontology further includes at least one process for obtaining information.
3. The apparatus of claim 2 wherein said stored concept includes a plurality of concept attributes and said stored process includes a plurality of process attributes.
4. An apparatus for creating at least a portion of a document, comprising: a memory for storing at least one ontology, said ontology including at least one concept; means for selecting a concept from said stored ontology; means for copying said selected concept into the document; means for inputting information relating to said selected concept into the document; and a display for displaying the document.
5. The apparatus of claim 4 wherein said memory stores a plurality of ontologies and further comprising means for selecting an ontology from said plurality of ontologies.
6. The apparatus of claim 4 wherein said ontology further comprises at least one process for obtaining information and further comprising means for selecting a process from said ontology.
7. The apparatus of claim 6 further comprising means for obtaining information as requested by a selected process.
8. The apparatus of claim 6 wherein said stored concept includes a plurality of concept attributes and said stored process includes a plurality of process attributes.
9. A method for annotating an electronic document, comprising the steps of:
(a) providing an ontology having at least one concept;
(b) providing a body of information in electronic form;
(c) identifying at least one datum within the body of information;
(d) matching the datum with at least one concept contained within the ontology;
(e) annotating the datum with the at least one concept; and
(f) storing in a memory the annotated datum.
10. The method of claim 9 wherein said annotated datum storing step comprises storing in an electronic form the datum, the at least one concept and the connection between them.
11. The method of claim 10 further comprising the steps of: identifying at least one attribute from the standard lexicon that describes the datum; annotating the datum with the attributes selected for the datum; and storing in an electronic storage mechanism the datum, annotated with the at least one concept and the at least one identified attribute.
12. The method of claim 9 wherein said ontology providing step comprises providing an ontology having at least one concept and a standard lexicon of attributes to describe the at least one concept;
13. The method of claim 9 wherein said ontology providing step further comprises the step of providing a plurality of ontologies, each ontology having at least one concept and a standard lexicon of attributes to describe the at least one concept.
14. The method of claim 9 wherein said annotating step comprises annotating the datum using a mark up language.
15. The method of claim 14 wherein said annotating step further comprises selecting the at least one concept from a menu of terms electronically displayed to a user.
16. The method of claim 14 wherein said annotated datum storing step further comprises storing the at least one concept in the form of mark up language.
17. The method of claim 9 further comprising repeating steps (a)-(e) for additional data within the body of information and storing in the memory the annotated data.
18. A method for creating at least a portion of a document, comprising the steps of: selecting an ontology; selecting a concept from a menu of concepts belonging to the selected ontology; copying the selected concept to the document; and inputting information relating to the concept into the document.
19. The method of claim 18 wherein the selected concept includes attributes related to the concept.
20. The method of claim 18 further comprising the step of selecting a process from a menu of processes.
21. The method of claim 20 wherein the selected process includes attributes related to the process.
22. The method of claim 20 further comprising the step of using the selected process to obtain information relating to the selected concept and automatically inputting the information relating to the concept into the document.
PCT/US2001/003670 2000-02-04 2001-02-05 Annotating semantic ontologies WO2001056388A2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU2001234819A AU2001234819A1 (en) 2000-02-04 2001-02-05 Annotating semantic ontologies

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US49891000A 2000-02-04 2000-02-04
US09/498,910 2000-02-04

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2001056388A2 true WO2001056388A2 (en) 2001-08-09
WO2001056388A3 WO2001056388A3 (en) 2002-03-07
WO2001056388A9 WO2001056388A9 (en) 2002-11-07

Family

ID=23983005

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2001/003670 WO2001056388A2 (en) 2000-02-04 2001-02-05 Annotating semantic ontologies

Country Status (2)

Country Link
AU (1) AU2001234819A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2001056388A2 (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2003065251A1 (en) * 2002-01-29 2003-08-07 Children's Hospital Boston Information exchange between heterogeneous databases through automated identification of concept equivalence
US7305406B2 (en) 2003-12-17 2007-12-04 International Business Machines Corporation Computer aided authoring, electronic document browsing, retrieving, and subscribing and publishing
US9582503B2 (en) 2010-09-29 2017-02-28 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Interactive addition of semantic concepts to a document
US10216733B2 (en) 2006-04-14 2019-02-26 Gregg S. Homer Smart commenting software

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5586239A (en) * 1991-10-17 1996-12-17 Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. Computer controlled graphics display system for supporting information classification
US5806079A (en) * 1993-11-19 1998-09-08 Smartpatents, Inc. System, method, and computer program product for using intelligent notes to organize, link, and manipulate disparate data objects
US5845301A (en) * 1993-11-19 1998-12-01 Smartpatents, Inc. System, method, and computer program product for displaying and processing notes containing note segments linked to portions of documents
US5893092A (en) * 1994-12-06 1999-04-06 University Of Central Florida Relevancy ranking using statistical ranking, semantics, relevancy feedback and small pieces of text
US5918236A (en) * 1996-06-28 1999-06-29 Oracle Corporation Point of view gists and generic gists in a document browsing system
US5940831A (en) * 1996-08-28 1999-08-17 Nec Corporation Hypermedia system and method of managing directories and directory data originating from a node link structure in a directory server

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5586239A (en) * 1991-10-17 1996-12-17 Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. Computer controlled graphics display system for supporting information classification
US5806079A (en) * 1993-11-19 1998-09-08 Smartpatents, Inc. System, method, and computer program product for using intelligent notes to organize, link, and manipulate disparate data objects
US5845301A (en) * 1993-11-19 1998-12-01 Smartpatents, Inc. System, method, and computer program product for displaying and processing notes containing note segments linked to portions of documents
US5893092A (en) * 1994-12-06 1999-04-06 University Of Central Florida Relevancy ranking using statistical ranking, semantics, relevancy feedback and small pieces of text
US5918236A (en) * 1996-06-28 1999-06-29 Oracle Corporation Point of view gists and generic gists in a document browsing system
US5940831A (en) * 1996-08-28 1999-08-17 Nec Corporation Hypermedia system and method of managing directories and directory data originating from a node link structure in a directory server

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2003065251A1 (en) * 2002-01-29 2003-08-07 Children's Hospital Boston Information exchange between heterogeneous databases through automated identification of concept equivalence
US7305406B2 (en) 2003-12-17 2007-12-04 International Business Machines Corporation Computer aided authoring, electronic document browsing, retrieving, and subscribing and publishing
US10216733B2 (en) 2006-04-14 2019-02-26 Gregg S. Homer Smart commenting software
US9582503B2 (en) 2010-09-29 2017-02-28 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Interactive addition of semantic concepts to a document
US10642937B2 (en) 2010-09-29 2020-05-05 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Interactive addition of semantic concepts to a document

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2001056388A3 (en) 2002-03-07
WO2001056388A9 (en) 2002-11-07
AU2001234819A1 (en) 2001-08-14

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US10872204B2 (en) Generating natural language recommendations based on an industrial language model
US8566374B2 (en) Method and system to generate and deliver auto-assembled presentations based on queries of multimedia collections
Marchionini Information seeking in electronic environments
US6598046B1 (en) System and method for retrieving documents responsive to a given user's role and scenario
Mack et al. Knowledge portals and the emerging digital knowledge workplace
US6098061A (en) Computer system for interactive help using human-understandable knowledge and computer-understandable knowledge
US7536637B1 (en) Method and system for the utilization of collaborative and social tagging for adaptation in web portals
US20070219956A1 (en) Excel spreadsheet parsing to share cells, formulas, tables, etc.
Detlor Towards knowledge portals: From human issues to intelligent agents
US20100169233A1 (en) Software system for managing information in context
US20080147661A1 (en) System and method for publishing manuscripts
CN108537644A (en) A kind of method and apparatus of customer service recommended products
CN106796578A (en) Autoknowledge system
CN101004737A (en) Individualized document processing system based on keywords
WO2009045918A2 (en) Intelligent editing of relational models
US8306984B2 (en) System, method, and data structure for providing access to interrelated sources of information
US20200380067A1 (en) Classifying content of an electronic file
US20230104324A1 (en) File Management Systems and Methods
Kuechler Business applications of unstructured text
US20050132324A1 (en) System and method for efficient development of configurable software systems in a large software development community
WO2001056388A2 (en) Annotating semantic ontologies
Yamakata et al. A case study on start-up of dataset construction: In case of recipe named entity corpus
Ruiz-Martínez et al. An ontological model for managing professional expertise
EP1304640A2 (en) System and method for using web based wizards and tools
Carr et al. Towards a knowledge-aware office environment

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT TZ UA UG UZ VN YU ZA ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT TZ UA UG UZ VN YU ZA ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: 8642

AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: C2

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT TZ UA UG UZ VN YU ZA ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: C2

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase
NENP Non-entry into the national phase in:

Ref country code: JP