WO2002069650A1 - Method and apparatus for performance improvement of multi-service networks - Google Patents
Method and apparatus for performance improvement of multi-service networks Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2002069650A1 WO2002069650A1 PCT/EP2002/001883 EP0201883W WO02069650A1 WO 2002069650 A1 WO2002069650 A1 WO 2002069650A1 EP 0201883 W EP0201883 W EP 0201883W WO 02069650 A1 WO02069650 A1 WO 02069650A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- performance
- network
- communication paths
- service
- communication
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04Q—SELECTING
- H04Q3/00—Selecting arrangements
- H04Q3/0016—Arrangements providing connection between exchanges
- H04Q3/0062—Provisions for network management
- H04Q3/0091—Congestion or overload control
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L43/00—Arrangements for monitoring or testing data switching networks
- H04L43/04—Processing captured monitoring data, e.g. for logfile generation
- H04L43/045—Processing captured monitoring data, e.g. for logfile generation for graphical visualisation of monitoring data
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L43/00—Arrangements for monitoring or testing data switching networks
- H04L43/16—Threshold monitoring
Definitions
- the invention disclosed and claimed herein generally pertains to a multi-service network, that is, a network wherein different types of single service communication networks or traffic streams may be connected together, to form different types of communication paths. More particularly, the invention pertains to a method and apparatus for use in analyzing performance of multi-service networks, in order to improve performance thereof. Even more particularly, the invention pertains to an arrangement for enabling the performance of different types of communication paths in a multi-service network to be compared with one another, by means of a common standard. As is well known by those of skill in the art, there is an ever-increasing need to be able to interconnect different single service networks, each associated with a distinctly different technology, in order to establish desired communication paths or channels.
- single-service communication systems and technologies include, but are by no means limited to, mobile phone and other wireless telecommunication systems, landline or wireline telecommunication systems such as the Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN), and the Internet Protocol (IP) network, used to access the internet.
- PSTN Public Switched Telephone Network
- IP Internet Protocol
- communication services To illustrate the challenges involved in interconnecting communication services of different kinds, it is observed that wireless and wireline telephone networks generally employ traditional circuit switches for connectivity.
- the IP network uses packets to carry voice, data and multimedia traffic, and thus must be packet switched.
- a multi-service network generally comprises a number of different single service networks, or communication services, which must be interconnected with one another.
- the multi-service network further comprises the equipment or components employed to establish or set up the connections.
- communication paths established within a multi-service network can be either heterogeneous or homogeneous.
- a heterogeneous communication path comprises interconnected components of two or more different types of communication services, whereas a homogeneous communication path exclusively comprises components of only a single type of communication service.
- a communication path in a multi-service network may be thought of as a chain of connection points or elements, extending through the network between two users.
- the invention is generally directed to a multi-service network, which comprises a number of different communication services and is operable to establish different types of homogeneous and heterogeneous communication paths.
- each homogeneous commumcation path comprises interconnected components of only a single one of the communication services
- each heterogeneous communication path comprises interconnected components of different services. It is anticipated that an embodiment of the invention will be able to provide a common basis for evaluating performance of all types of communication paths which can be constructed through or within a multi-service network. Such common basis for evaluation will apply to both heterogeneous and homogeneous communication paths, regardless of the technologies respectively associated therewith.
- the invention provides system operators with standard measureables to establish trends and proactively deal with them.
- the measureables are related to the end-to-end performance of a network path, considering all elements of the connection chain. Thus, analysis is not fragmented amongst different technologies.
- the measureable standards may be readily used and easily understood by operations and maintenance staff who do not have advanced academic degrees, or equivalent high levels of training.
- the invention in one embodiment, is a method which includes the step of acquiring data pertaining to at least one common performance parameter for each type of communication path in a multi-service network as described above.
- the method further comprises the steps of constructing a performance graph for each type of communication path, from the data respectively acquired therefor, and comparing the performance graph of any one type of communication path of the network with the performance graph of any other type of communication path.
- the performance graph of a particular type of communication path may also be compared with a performance graph for the same path, or type of path, acquired at a different time and/or under different operating conditions.
- every path may be characterized as an attempt to establish communication between a first user and a second user, and may be further characterized by whether the effort is successful or unsuccessful.
- data pertaining to these attempts and successes, as well as to the level of losses may be used to provide the performance parameters referred to above, and performance graphs may be constructed therefrom.
- connection is used generically herein to refer to the establishment of any homogenous or heterogeneous commumcation path through the multi-service network, as described above.
- At least one of the performance parameters comprises a representation of the number of connections successfully completed through a communication path, relative to the number of connections attempted.
- Such representation may, for example, express successful connections as a percentage of the total number of connections attempted.
- the method further includes the step of selectively altering a specified characteristic of the multi-service network, and then determining effects of the selected alteration on the performance of respective communication paths.
- the multi-service network includes wireless, wireline, and/or internet communication services.
- the data acquisition step comprises selectively operating the multi-service network to establish communication paths of the respective different types, and then measuring the values of the performance parameters for each established communication path.
- the data acquisition step may comprise accessing a database, such as a database of connection/call detail records, or a centralized connection/call information database.
- the invention By providing a common standard or basis for comparing different types of interconnected service paths in a multi-service network, the invention enables operators thereof to determine which types of service inter-connections are most profitable. Such information may be extremely useful to network operators in their business planning. Also, it is anticipated that the invention will enable operators to more readily locate or identify deficiencies within a multi-service network, so that limited resources can be concentrated to correct the deficiencies. For example, simply by comparing the performance graphs of two different types of communication paths, it could become readily apparent that there were significantly more faults in one path than in the other. As a further advantage, the invention will more readily enable certain evaluations and analyses in a multi-service network.
- a characteristic or feature of one of the commumcation services may be selectively altered.
- An embodiment of the invention can then be employed to determine the "global impact" of the alteration, that is, the impact or effect thereof on each of the other services and on different interconnections thereof.
- Figure 1 is a schematic diagram showing a multi-service network, together with certain single services associated therewith, which may be used in connection with an embodiment of the invention.
- Figure 2 is a schematic diagram showing a matrix pertaining to different single communication services which is useful for illustrating a basic concept of the invention.
- Figure 3 depicts a performance graph for an embodiment of the invention.
- Figure 4 is a block diagram depicting a simplified arrangement for constructing the performance graph of Figure 3.
- multi-service network 10 which, as described above, comprises a number of different types of communication services
- communication service 12 comprises a wireless telephone network, and users thereof may employ mobile phones 22 for transmission and reception.
- Communication service 14 comprises a land line or wire line network such as PSTN, and users may employ a conventional wire line telephone 24 therewith.
- Commumcation service 16 comprises a network such as the IP network for connecting personal computers (PC) 26 and the like to the Internet.
- communication service 18 comprises a network for coupling a laptop computer 28 to the Internet, through a wireless phone 30.
- Communication service 20 comprises a cable TV network for transmitting and receiving video images 32, by means of a video input/output (I/O) device 34, such as a video camera or display device.
- I/O video input/output
- multi-service network 10 provided with a network core 36 connected to each of the communication services
- Core 36 comprises an array of equipment and other components (not shown) which are collectively operable to establish bi-directional paths for communicating information between users of any two of the services 12-20.
- Suitable equipment and components will readily occur to those of skill in the art and include, by way of example, a product of assignee Wegmanmaschinen LM
- FIG. 1 shows network core 36 operated to connect wire line service 14 to IP service 16, at nodes 38a and 38b, in order to set up a communication path 40 extending between the services 14 and 16.
- multi-service network 10 may be readily employed to transmit information between a user of telephone 24 and a user of PC 26.
- multi-service network 10 can include other types of commumcation services besides or in addition to services 12-20.
- Figure 1 shows a wireless communication service 42 connected thereto or included therein, wherein service 42 may be similar or identical to wireless service 12 described above.
- wireless communication services 12 and 42 can be connected together at nodes 46a and 46b, in order to set up a communication path 48 extending between wireless services 12 and 42.
- multi-service network 10 may also be used to transmit information between users of the same type of communication service, such as the respective users of mobile phones 22 and 44.
- path 40 extending between services 14 and 16 may be referred to as a heterogeneous communication path
- the path 48 extending between services 12 and 42 may be referred to as a homogeneous communication path.
- FIG. 2 there is shown a network service oriented matrix, which is useful for illustrating compilation of a traffic profile of multi-service network 10.
- Each row and column of the matrix is identified by one of the I/O devices 22-28, respectively associated with commumcation services 12-18 shown in Figure 1. It is to be understood that a terminal associated with each device may be readily connected to terminals associated with other devices.
- Each position of the matrix contains a performance graph 50, described hereinafter in further detail, which sets forth values of certain performance parameters for one of the communication paths of multi-service network 10. More specifically, the performance graph positioned at the intersection of a particular row and column of the matrix is constructed from performance data of a communication path which is formed by interconnecting the communication services associated with the particular row and column, respectively.
- performance graph 50a is constructed from data acquired from heterogeneous communication path 40 shown in Figure 1, connecting telephone 24 and PC 26.
- performance graph 50b is constructed from data acquired from homogenous communication path 48.
- a homogenous communication path could be established from two separate networks of the same type, such as two mobile phone networks connected together through network core 36.
- a homogenous path could be established from components of a single service or network interconnected with network cor e 36.
- FIG. 3 there is shown a performance graph 50 of a type disclosed in commonly assigned U.S. Patent No. 5,359,649, which names one of the co-inventors herein as a patentee.
- the performance graph 50 of Figure 3 which is associated with a particular communication path of multi-service network 10, is usefully obtained from service quality statistics measurements.
- the parameter identified as service loss is the total loss of service due to congestions, lost cells or delays and technical faults, and is expressed as a percentage of the total connections, as such term is defined above, which are attempted.
- evaluating service loss a differentiation is made between technical losses, such as those due to exchange faults and transmission faults, and traffic losses such as those due to internal and external exchange congestion, system delays, and to network traffic management actions.
- Another communication path performance variable service quality (estimated successful connections established rate) is calculated as 100% minus the service loss.
- This variable includes all connections which do not result in communication between users or subscribers, and thus includes losses resulting from subscriber behavior, rather than losses resulting from technical faults and traffic congestion.
- subscriber behavior losses include connections in which the initiating subscriber is timed out, an incorrect or nonexistent number or address is accessed, and the initiating subscriber hangs up or disconnects prematurely (incomplete connection). Further losses, associated with the recipient subscriber, occur when the recipient subscriber is busy or does not answer, the recipient equipment is out of order, and the recipient is barred from responding to incoming connections.
- the successful connection percentage is the percentage of connections which result in actual communication.
- the performance graph shown in Figure 3 provides very useful information, that is, the number of connections which are successful from the subscriber's point of view, as a percentage of a specified total number of connections attempted, over the communication path with which the performance graph is associated.
- comparison of performance graphs in accordance with the invention could provide early notification that an overload condition was developing in one type of service, which could lead to overload or deterioration of other types of services or the entire network. Such early notification would enable corrective action to be taken right away.
- the type of parameter data used in constructing respective performance graphs 50 is applicable to all communication paths which can be established in the multi-service network. That is, data pertaining to connections attempted, to connections lost and to connections successfully established or set up is measurable and has the same significance for every commumcation path, regardless of the technology or technologies respectively associated therewith. Accordingly, the performance graphs described above provide common criteria or standards for evaluation and analysis in a multi-service network. Moreover, in addition to enabling meaningful comparisons between two different types of communications paths, the graphs provide a useful tool for evaluating performance of a particular type of communication path, at different times or under different operating conditions. For example, the successful connections rate of a communication path could be weighted by a factor such as 1%. A change of more than 1% in the successful connections rate for the path would be noted and regarded as significant.
- the data required to construct respective performance graphs may be acquired from Connection/Call Detail Records (CDR's), rather than from direct measurement.
- CDR's Connection/Call Detail Records
- Suppliers of telecommunication services frequently generate and store CDR's for each call or connection.
- CDR's may be retained in a connection/call data warehouse, a facility for storing normalized data for long periods of time.
- a data warehouse 52 supplying CDR's to a processor 54.
- Processor 54 is operable to extract information from received CDR's which pertain to a particular communication path, and to construct a performance graph 50 from the extracted information which pertains to the particular path.
- processor 54 can be operated to generate a number of performance graphs internally, and to make comparisons therebetween to provide useful conclusions in regard to the performance of an associated multi-service network.
- data for constructing the performance graphs may be supplied to processor 54 from a large centralized data base.
- a large centralized data base For example, certain countries maintain very extensive data bases of all telecommunication calls and connections.
- an embodiment of the invention may be used in a proactive mode. In such embodiment, for a selected type of communication path a series of test connections or calls are directed from a central location to different preselected locations, addresses or numbers.
- a test connection refers to an effort to establish a communication path with a preselected location only to see if the path can be successfully set up, not to communicate with a user or subscriber at the location.
- Data pertaining to the results that is, the number of connections attempted and the number of connections successfully established, are recorded and used to construct a performance graph and traffic profile for the selected path. If the acquired data indicates that the successful connection rate is too low, or decreases by an amount greater than a weighting factor such as 1%, corrective action may be taken. Such proactive operation has the benefit of detecting problems in the selected communication path, so that the problems can be fixed or corrected before subscribers are affected by them.
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
AT02722120T ATE302531T1 (en) | 2001-02-22 | 2002-02-21 | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR IMPROVING PERFORMANCE IN MULTIPLE SERVICE NETWORKS |
EP02722120A EP1364540B1 (en) | 2001-02-22 | 2002-02-21 | Method and apparatus for performance improvement of multi-service networks |
DE60205591T DE60205591D1 (en) | 2001-02-22 | 2002-02-21 | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR IMPROVING EFFICIENCY IN MULTIPLE SERVICE NETWORKS |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US09/791,476 | 2001-02-22 | ||
US09/791,476 US20020114281A1 (en) | 2001-02-22 | 2001-02-22 | Method and apparatus for performance improvement of multi-service networks |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2002069650A1 true WO2002069650A1 (en) | 2002-09-06 |
Family
ID=25153853
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2002/001883 WO2002069650A1 (en) | 2001-02-22 | 2002-02-21 | Method and apparatus for performance improvement of multi-service networks |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20020114281A1 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1364540B1 (en) |
AT (1) | ATE302531T1 (en) |
DE (1) | DE60205591D1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2002069650A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7363363B2 (en) * | 2002-05-17 | 2008-04-22 | Xds, Inc. | System and method for provisioning universal stateless digital and computing services |
US7555546B1 (en) * | 2003-09-25 | 2009-06-30 | Nortel Networks Limited | Enterprise network services architecture |
US20070106797A1 (en) * | 2005-09-29 | 2007-05-10 | Nortel Networks Limited | Mission goal statement to policy statement translation |
US7844705B2 (en) * | 2008-05-30 | 2010-11-30 | General Electric Company | Networked image visualization image quality enhancement method and system |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5359649A (en) * | 1991-10-02 | 1994-10-25 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson | Congestion tuning of telecommunications networks |
EP0849912A2 (en) * | 1996-12-18 | 1998-06-24 | Nortel Networks Corporation | Communications network monitoring |
EP1043871A2 (en) * | 1999-04-09 | 2000-10-11 | Nortel Networks Limited | Routes and paths management |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
FI113224B (en) * | 1996-11-11 | 2004-03-15 | Nokia Corp | Implementation of invoicing in a data communication system |
US6667956B2 (en) * | 1998-05-01 | 2003-12-23 | Nortel Networks Limited | Multi-class network |
US6775240B1 (en) * | 1999-09-21 | 2004-08-10 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | System and methods for measuring quality of communications over packet networks |
US6765921B1 (en) * | 2000-06-28 | 2004-07-20 | Nortel Networks Limited | Communications network |
-
2001
- 2001-02-22 US US09/791,476 patent/US20020114281A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2002
- 2002-02-21 AT AT02722120T patent/ATE302531T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2002-02-21 DE DE60205591T patent/DE60205591D1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-02-21 EP EP02722120A patent/EP1364540B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-02-21 WO PCT/EP2002/001883 patent/WO2002069650A1/en not_active Application Discontinuation
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5359649A (en) * | 1991-10-02 | 1994-10-25 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson | Congestion tuning of telecommunications networks |
EP0849912A2 (en) * | 1996-12-18 | 1998-06-24 | Nortel Networks Corporation | Communications network monitoring |
EP1043871A2 (en) * | 1999-04-09 | 2000-10-11 | Nortel Networks Limited | Routes and paths management |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
ATE302531T1 (en) | 2005-09-15 |
EP1364540B1 (en) | 2005-08-17 |
EP1364540A1 (en) | 2003-11-26 |
DE60205591D1 (en) | 2005-09-22 |
US20020114281A1 (en) | 2002-08-22 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7388946B1 (en) | System and method for evaluating the quality of service in an IP telephony network using call forwarding | |
US10491500B2 (en) | System and method for path state determinations | |
CN100521652C (en) | Method and apparatus for signaling Voip call based on class of service in Voip service system | |
US7573825B2 (en) | Methods, apparatus and computer program products for testing a voice over Internet protocol communication system | |
CN1178443C (en) | Communication controller | |
EP1623521B1 (en) | System and method for telecommunication diagnostic information management | |
US7519074B2 (en) | Voice call coordinator | |
US7436936B2 (en) | VoIP call through tester | |
US7835272B1 (en) | Backhaul path diversity for wireless networks | |
US20070286351A1 (en) | Method and System for Adaptive Media Quality Monitoring | |
US9419869B2 (en) | Indicating performance information to a user to improve communications | |
US20080175228A1 (en) | Proactive quality assessment of voice over IP calls systems | |
GB2425020A (en) | Processing information from a telephone system | |
US7046636B1 (en) | System and method for adaptively improving voice quality throughout a communication session | |
CN101453522A (en) | Method for non-standardized dialing service monitoring between networks | |
JP2002271833A (en) | Communication quality maintenance method for service area in mobile communication system, and its mobile communication terminal and management server system | |
WO2018192149A1 (en) | Dial testing method, apparatus and system | |
CN110519786A (en) | Business service quality monitoring method, equipment and system | |
CN110061931A (en) | Clustering method, device, system and the computer storage medium of industry control agreement | |
EP1364540B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for performance improvement of multi-service networks | |
JP2003101680A (en) | Call method and call terminal via information communication network, and call system | |
CN110430607A (en) | The processing method and equipment of business continuance | |
US8995633B2 (en) | System and method for creating a routing matrix for routing local calls | |
Cisco | Troubleshooting with Call Flows | |
KR100848504B1 (en) | Method for Measuring Quality of Wireless Internet Data Service about Corporation Call, Server and System Using the Same |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NO NZ OM PH PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TN TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VN YU ZA ZM ZW |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG |
|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
DFPE | Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101) | ||
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2002722120 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWP | Wipo information: published in national office |
Ref document number: 2002722120 Country of ref document: EP |
|
REG | Reference to national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: 8642 |
|
WWG | Wipo information: grant in national office |
Ref document number: 2002722120 Country of ref document: EP |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: JP |
|
WWW | Wipo information: withdrawn in national office |
Country of ref document: JP |