WO2003011211A2 - Peg-modified uricase - Google Patents

Peg-modified uricase Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2003011211A2
WO2003011211A2 PCT/US2002/013265 US0213265W WO03011211A2 WO 2003011211 A2 WO2003011211 A2 WO 2003011211A2 US 0213265 W US0213265 W US 0213265W WO 03011211 A2 WO03011211 A2 WO 03011211A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
uricase
group
polyethylene glycol
lys
compound
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2002/013265
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO2003011211A3 (en
Inventor
Charles Mark Ensor
Mike A. Clark
Frederick Wayne Holtsberg
Original Assignee
Phoenix Pharmacologics, Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Phoenix Pharmacologics, Inc. filed Critical Phoenix Pharmacologics, Inc.
Priority to EP02791530A priority Critical patent/EP1420748A4/en
Priority to JP2003516443A priority patent/JP2005528881A/en
Priority to AU2002308487A priority patent/AU2002308487A1/en
Publication of WO2003011211A2 publication Critical patent/WO2003011211A2/en
Publication of WO2003011211A3 publication Critical patent/WO2003011211A3/en

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N9/00Enzymes; Proenzymes; Compositions thereof; Processes for preparing, activating, inhibiting, separating or purifying enzymes
    • C12N9/0004Oxidoreductases (1.)
    • C12N9/0012Oxidoreductases (1.) acting on nitrogen containing compounds as donors (1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7)
    • C12N9/0044Oxidoreductases (1.) acting on nitrogen containing compounds as donors (1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7) acting on other nitrogen compounds as donors (1.7)
    • C12N9/0046Oxidoreductases (1.) acting on nitrogen containing compounds as donors (1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7) acting on other nitrogen compounds as donors (1.7) with oxygen as acceptor (1.7.3)
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61PSPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
    • A61P13/00Drugs for disorders of the urinary system
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61PSPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
    • A61P13/00Drugs for disorders of the urinary system
    • A61P13/12Drugs for disorders of the urinary system of the kidneys
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61PSPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
    • A61P19/00Drugs for skeletal disorders
    • A61P19/06Antigout agents, e.g. antihyperuricemic or uricosuric agents
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61PSPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
    • A61P35/00Antineoplastic agents
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61KPREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K38/00Medicinal preparations containing peptides

Definitions

  • the present invention is directed to uricase modified with polyethylene glycol and to methods for treating number of different illnesses characterized by increased circulating uric acid levels.
  • Uric acid is a product of purine metabolism in birds, reptiles, and primates, including humans. Uric acid is produced in the liver by oxidation of xanthine and hypoxanthine. Xanthine is an intermediate in the catabolism of guanine nucleotides while hypoxanthine is produced during the breakdown of adenine nucleotides. In most mammals, uric acid is further oxidized by the enzyme urate oxidase to allantoin. Allantoin, because of its lost pyrimidine ring, shows a more than 20 times greater water solubility than uric acid. Urate oxidase, also called uricase, is an enzyme of the purine degradation pathway. Uricase catalyzes the conversion of uric acid + O 2 into allantoin + CO 2 .
  • Hyperuricemia is defined as occurring when the serum level of uric acid is above 8 mg/dl. Hyperuricemia can result in the formation of uric acid crystals in the serum, which can precipitate in joints, skin and kidneys. This can result in inflammation of the joints (gout), renal failure, metabolic acidosis, and hyperkalemia. Overproduction of uric acid can have a variety of origins, including congenital metabolic defects, Lesch-Nyhan syndrome, excess ingestion of purine or proteins, and treatments with uricosuric drugs (Kelley, W.N. and Wortman, R. L. Textbook of Rheumatology, 5 th edition, pp 1313-1351, 1997; which is incorporated by reference). Hyperuricemia is also found in patients that have had heart or kidney transplants and are being treated with immunosupressive agents. Hyperuricemia can lead to the loss of kidney function in these patients and can produce significant morbidity and mortality.
  • Hyperuricemia is also found in patients with malignant diseases. Chemotherapy and radiation therapy of cancer patients can induce a life-threatening condition known as tumor lysis syndrome (Kalemkerian, G. P., Darwish, B., and Varterasian, M. L. Am J. Med. 103, 363-367, 1997; Lorigan, P.C., Woodings, P. L., Morgenstern, G. R., and Scarffe, J. H. Ann Oncol. 7, 631-636, 1996; Hande, K. R., and Garrow, G. C. Am. J. Med. 94, 133-139, 1993). Hematologic malignancies, such as leukemias and lymphomas, are responsible for most cases of tumor lysis syndrome.
  • Tumor lysis syndrome is characterized by the rapid development of hyperuricemia, hyperkalemia, hyperphosphatemia, and acute renal failure. Acute renal failure is the result of the intrarenal precipitation of uric acid. Tumor lysis syndrome is often triggered by cell death induced by chemotherapy or radiotherapy, resulting in the release of intracellular substances. However, occasionally cancer patients with a heavy tumor burden may exhibit hyperuricemia and other features of tumor lysis syndrome even in the absence of radiotherapy or chemotherapy because of the high turnover of malignant cells with subsequent catabolism of released purines into uric acid.
  • Allopurinol is converted to oxypurinol, which then binds to and inhibits xanthine oxidase, the enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of hypoxanthine and xanthine to uric acid. As a result, uric acid production is inhibited, and xanthine and hypoxanthine concentrations increase.
  • allopurinol does not remove uric acid that is already present and deposited intrarenally as crystals. As a result, it is often several days (sometimes 10-14 days) from the initial treatment with allopurinol before a significant decrease in uric acid in serum can be observed.
  • Allopurinol can produce severe toxic effects, including cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions, leukopenia, and hepatomegaly. This drug has been also implicated in the induction of tubulointerstitial nephritis. In addition, allopurinol may cause adverse drug interactions, as has been shown for 6-me ⁇ captopurine and adenine arabinoside, drugs often used to treat lymphoproliferative disease and leukemia (Lauter, CB, Bailey, EJ, Lerner, AM. J Infect. Dis 1976; 134, 75-79). Finally, although allopurinol can block the formation of uric acid, it does little to solubilize the uric acid which is already present.
  • allopurinol is not an ideal drug for the treatment of hyperuricemia.
  • Dialysis and continuous ateriovenous hemodialysis are additional methods that are used to remove uric acid in patients with hyperuricemia.
  • these treatment methods are problematic in patients with malignancies because of the risk for severe bleeding caused by thrombocytopenia or the need for anticoagulation.
  • Uricase has been shown to be an effective treatment for hyperuricemia and tumor lysis syndrome (London, M., and Hudson, P. B. Science, 125, 937-938, 1957; Oberling, F. and Lang, J. M. organism Presse Med 3, 2026, 1974; Robert, A., Corberand, J. and Regnier, C. Rev. Med.doch 12, 1093-1100, 1976; Masera, G., et. al., J. Pediatrics 100, 152-155, 1982; Jankovic, M., et. al. Am. J. Pediatr. Hematol. Onocol. 7, 202-204, 1985; Masera, G. and Jankovic, M. Ann. Oncol. 8, 407, 1996; Jones, D.
  • uricase converts uric acid into the highly soluble allantoin. Furthermore, uricase, if adequately filtered into the urine, may even dissolve already precipitated uric acid crystals and improve renal function.
  • Uricase has a number of advantages in the treatment of hyperuricemia and nephrolithiasis including the speed of the hypouricemic effect (reduction of hyperuricemia of the order of 50% in less than 24 h) and better protection of the kidney against lithiasis compared with other drugs such as allopurinol. Uricase is only available in a few countries, currently limiting the use of this therapy. Uricase extracted from Aspergillus flavus through a complex manufacturing process, has been commercially available from Sanofi (Clin-Midy, Paris, France) under the trade name Uricozyme in France since 1975 and in Italy since the early 1980s.
  • the uricase currently used as a drug is obtained by culturing Aspergillus flavus and isolating the enzyme from the culture medium by extraction, followed by several purification steps. While it is possible to obtain highly purified uricase, this method has disadvantages. Aspergillus flavus is not easy to work with because of its physiology and genetics (WOLOSHUK et al. Applied Environ. Microbiol., 55, 86-90, 1989), making it difficult to obtain strains that can produce substantial amounts of the enzyme. Aspergillus flavus can also produce aflatoxins, which can be difficult to remove during the purification process. The purified uricase must be checked to ensure that it is free from these toxins.
  • uricase has been tested in the United States, it is not an approved therapy because of the of a high incidence of allergic reactions to this foreign protein.
  • the clinical use of uricase is also compromised by its short circulating half-life. (See, Park et al, Anticancer Res., 1:373-6 (1981).
  • PEG polyethylene glycol
  • PEG polyethylene glycol
  • PEG-uricase uricase isolated from Candida utilis
  • Serum uric acid fell to undetectable levels within 60 minutes after injection, and remained undetectable for at least 32 hours.
  • the serum half-life of PEG- 5,000 uricase was 6 hours.
  • the half-life of native (unpegylated) uricase was noted to be less than 4 hours in other studies. Precipitating antibodies to PEG-uricase or native uricase were not detected in any patient.
  • Davis et al. noted that PEG-5,000 uricase offered a potentially major therapeutic advantage over native uricase in the treatment of hyperuricemic diseases. Chua, et al.
  • the present invention addresses the needs identified above in that it provides formulations of uricase which overcome the disadvantages of uricase compositions used to date.
  • the present invention is directed to uricase modified with polyethylene glycol.
  • uricase is modified with polyethylene glycol having a total weight average molecular weight of about 10,000 to about 50,000, directly or through a biocompatible linking group.
  • uricase is modified with polyethylene glycol having a total weight average molecular weight of about 10,000 to about 30,000.
  • uricase is modified with polyethylene glycol having a total weight average molecular weight of about 20,000.
  • Another embodiment of the invention is directed to methods of treating uric acid related diseases including hyperuricemia, tumor lysis syndrome, and nephrolithiasis, among others, comprising administering a therapeutically effective amount of a compound comprising PEG-modified uricase.
  • uricase is modified with polyethylene glycol having a total weight average molecular weight of about 20,000.
  • the present invention provides methods of enhancing the circulating half life of uricase comprising modifying said uricase by covalently bonding said uricase via a linking group to polyethylene glycol, wherein the polyethylene glycol has a total weight average molecular weight of about 10,000 to about 30,000, and wherein the linking group is selected from the group consisting of a succinimide group, an amide group, an imide group, a carbamate group, an ester group, an epoxy group, a carboxyl group, a hydroxyl group, a carbohydrate, a tyrosine group, a cysteine group, a histidine group and combinations thereof.
  • the present invention provides methods of enhancing the anti-uric acid activity of uricase comprising modifying said uricase by covalently bonding said uricase via a linking group to polyethylene glycol, wherein the polyethylene glycol has a total weight average molecular weight of from about 10,000 to about 30,000, and wherein the linking group is selected from the group consisting of a succinimide group, an amide group, an imide group, a carbamate group, an ester group, an epoxy group, a carboxyl group, a hydroxyl group, a carbohydrate, a tyrosine group, a cysteine group, a histidine group and combinations thereof.
  • the present invention provides methods of reducing uric acid levels in a patient comprising administering to said patient a therapeutically effective amount of a compound comprising uricase covalently bonded via a linking group to polyethylene glycol, wherein the polyethylene glycol has a total weight average molecular weight of from about 10,000 to about 30,000.
  • uricase is modified with polyethylene glycol having a total weight average molecular weight of about 20,000.
  • the present invention provides methods of treating uric acid related disorders in a patient comprising administering to said patient a therapeutically effective amount of a compound comprising uricase covalently bonded via a linking group to polyethylene glycol, wherein the polyethylene glycol has a total weight average molecular weight of from about 10,000 to about 30,000.
  • uricase is modified with polyethylene glycol having a total weight average molecular weight of about 20,000.
  • the present invention provides a compound comprising uricase coupled to polyethylene glycol, without a linking group wherein the polyethylene glycol has a total weight average molecular weight of about 10,000 to about 30,000.
  • uricase is modified with polyethylene glycol having a total weight average molecular weight of about 20,000.
  • Uricase may be found in many microorganisms and is useful for the treatment of many diseases and disorders in humans. However, uricase is antigenic and rapidly cleared from circulation in a patient. These problems may be overcome by covalently modifying uricase with polyethylene glycol (PEG).
  • PEG polyethylene glycol
  • the present invention is based on the discovery that uricase modified with polyethylene glycol provides excellent results in treating certain types of diseases and disorders related to elevated levels of uric acid in humans.
  • uricase-PEG When compared to native uricase, uricase-PEG retains most of its enzymatic activity, is far less antigenic, has a greatly extended circulating half-life, and is much more efficacious in the treatment of diseases and disorders including hyperuricemia and tumor lysis syndrome, among others.
  • PEG-20,000 is especially preferred as it possesses prefened enzymatic activity levels, antigenicity, circulating half-life, efficacy, and relative ease of manufacture. Definitions
  • Uricase covalently modified with polyethylene glycol may be hereinafter referred to as "uricase-PEG”, “urate oxidase-PEG”, or “PEG- uricase”.
  • Polyethylene glycol or “PEG” refers to mixtures of condensation polymers of ethylene oxide and water, in a branched or straight chain, represented by the general formula H(OCH 2 CH 2 ) n OH, wherein n is at least 4.
  • Polyethylene glycol or “PEG” is used in combination with a numeric suffix to indicate the approximate weight average molecular weight thereof.
  • PEG-5,000 refers to polyethylene glycol having a total weight average molecular weight of about 5,000
  • PEG-12,000 refers to polyethylene glycol having a total weight average molecular weight of about 12,000
  • PEG-20,000 refers to polyethylene glycol having a total weight average molecular weight of about 20,000.
  • the term "patient” refers to an animal, preferably a mammal, and more preferably a human.
  • uric acid related disease refers to diseases and disorders characterized by elevated levels of uric acid. Uric acid related disorders include without limitation, hyperuricemia, tumor lysis syndrome, and nephrolithiasis, among others.
  • biocompatible refers to materials or compounds which are generally not injurious to biological functions and which will not result in any degree of unacceptable toxicity, including allergenic and disease states.
  • Circulating half life refers to the period of time, after injection of the modified uricase into a patient, until a quantity of the uricase has been cleared to levels one half of the original peak serum level. Circulating half life may be determined in any relevant species, including humans or mice.
  • covalently bonded and “coupled” are used interchangeably and refer a covalent bond linking uricase to the PEG molecule, either directly or through a linker.
  • Uricase In the present invention, the uricase gene may be derived, cloned or produced from any source, including, for example, from microorganisms, or via recombinant biotechnology, or any combination thereof.
  • uricase may be cloned from microorganisms including but not limited to Asperigillus flavus, Candida utilis, and Arthrobacter protoformiae.
  • the uricase used in the present invention may have the amino acid sequence set forth in the appended Sequence Listing.
  • Uricase may also may cloned from a large number of other organisms, including but not limited to bacteria, of the genera Streptomyces and Bacillus; fungi, (including the yeast) of the genera Saccharomyces, Schizosaccaromyces, Emericella, Aspergillus, and Neurospora; the fruit fly (Drosophila); mammals, including pig (Sus scrofa), squirrel monkey (Samiri sciureus), baboon (Papio), and rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta); and plants including the chickpea (Cicer arietinum), common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris), potato (Solanum tuberosum) and pea (Pisum sativum).
  • Polyethylene Glycol Polyethylene Glycol
  • the polyethylene glycol has a total weight average molecular weight of about 10,000 to about 50,000; more preferably from about 12,000 to about 40,000, more preferably from about 15,000 to about 30,000; and most preferably about 20,000.
  • polyethylene glycol with a molecular weight of 30,000 or more is difficult to dissolve, and yields of the formulated product are greatly reduced.
  • the polyethylene glycol may be a branched or straight chain, preferably a straight chain. Increasing the molecular weight of the polyethylene glycol generally tends to decrease the immunogenicity of the uricase.
  • the polyethylene glycols having the molecular weights described in the present invention may be used in conjunction with uricase, and, optionally, a biocompatible linking group, to treat diseases and disorders relating to elevated levels of uric acid. Pegylation
  • Uricase may be covalently bonded to PEG via a biocompatible linking group, using methods known in the art, as described, for example, by Park et al, Anticancer Res., 1:373- 376 (1981); and Zaplipsky and Lee, Polyethylene Glycol Chemistry: Biotechnical and Biomedical Applications, J.M. Harris, ed., Plenum Press, NY, Chapter 21 (1992), the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
  • the linking group used to covalently attach PEG to uricase may be any biocompatible linking group.
  • biocompatible indicates that the compound or group is non-toxic and may be utilized in vitro or in vivo without causing injury, sickness, disease or death.
  • PEG can be bonded to the linking group, for example, via an ether bond, an ester bond, a thiol bond or an amide bond.
  • Suitable biocompatible linking groups include, for example, an ester group, an amide group, an imide group, a carbamate group, a carboxyl group, a hydroxyl group, a carbohydrate, a succinimide group (including, for example, succinimidyl succinate (SS), succinimidyl propionate (SPA), succinimidyl carboxymethylate (SCM), succinimidyl succinamide (SSA) or N-hydroxy succinimide (NHS)), an epoxide group, an oxycarbonylimidazole group (including, for example, carbonyldimidazole (CDI)), a nitro phenyl group (including, for example, nitrophenyl carbonate (NPC) or trichlorophenyl carbonate (TPC)), a trysylate group, an aldehyde group, an isocyanate group, a vinylsulfone group, a tyrosine group, a cysteine group, a
  • the biocompatible linking group is an ester group and/or a succinimide group. More preferably, the linking group is SS, SPA, SCM, SSA or NHS; with SS, SPA or NHS being more preferred, and with SS or SPA being most prefened.
  • a common feature of the most preferred biocompatible linking groups is that they attach to a primary amine of uricase via a maleimide group. Once coupled with uricase, SS-PEG has an ester linkage next to the PEG, which may render this site sensitive to serum esterase, which may release PEG from uricase in the body.
  • SPA-PEG and PEG2-NHS do not have an ester linkage, so they are not sensitive to serum esterase.
  • the particular linking groups do not appear to influence the circulating half- life of PEG-uricase or its specific enzyme activity.
  • a linking group it is important to use a biocompatible linking group.
  • the PEG which is attached to the protein may be either a single chain, as with SS-PEG, SPA-PEG and SC- PEG, or a branched chain of PEG may be used, as with PEG2-NHS.
  • uricase may be coupled directly to PEG (i.e., without a linking group) through an amino group, a sulfhydral group, a hydroxyl group or a carboxyl group.
  • PEG is coupled to lysine residues on uricase.
  • the attachment of PEG to uricase increases the circulating half- life of uricase.
  • the number of PEG units on uricase appears to be related to the circulating half life of the enzyme, while the amount of retained enzymatic activity appears related to the average molecular weight of the PEG used.
  • PEG is attached to a primary amine of uricase. Selection of the attachment site of polyethylene glycol on the uricase is determined by the role of each of the sites within the active domain of the protein, as would be known to the skilled artisan.
  • PEG may be attached to the primary amines of uricase without substantial loss of enzymatic activity.
  • the amount of retained enzymatic activity appears to be related to the average molecular weight of the PEG used.
  • uricase cloned from C. utilis has about 32 lysines that may be pegylated by this procedure.
  • the 32 lysines are all possible points at which uricase can be attached to PEG via a biocompatible linking group, such as SS, SPA, SCM, SSA and/or NHS.
  • PEG may also be attached to other sites on uricase, either via a linking group or by direct attachment to a group on one or more residues, as would be apparent to one skilled in the art in view of the present disclosure.
  • From 1 to about 32 PEG molecules may be covalently bonded to uricase at lysine residues.
  • uricase is modified with about 5 to about 30 PEG molecules, more preferably from about 10 to about 25 PEG molecules, more preferably from about 18 to about 22 PEG molecules and most preferably about 20 PEG molecules.
  • uricase is modified with PEG-20,000.
  • Uricase may be pegylated at many different sites. In a prefened embodiment, uricase is pegylated at sites other than one or more of the following (numbers refer to the amino acid residue of C.
  • uricase is pegylated with about twenty PEG-20,000 molecules. In one such prefened embodiment, uricase is not pegylated at Lys 156 . In another prefened embodiment, uricase is not pegylated at Lys 167 . In another prefened embodiment, uricase is not pegylated at Lys 12 . In another prefened embodiment, uricase is not pegylated at Lys 64 .
  • uricase is not pegylated at Lys 262 . In another prefened embodiment, uricase is not pegylated at Lys 64 . In another prefened embodiment, uricase is not pegylated at Lys 262 . In another prefened embodiment, uricase is not pegylated at Lys 117 . In another prefened embodiment, uricase is not pegylated at Lys 16 . In another prefened embodiment, uricase is not pegylated at Lys 28 . In another prefened embodiment, uricase is not pegylated at Lys 72 .
  • uricase is not pegylated at Lys 156 and Lys 167 . In a more preferred embodiment, uricase is not pegyolated at Lys 156 , Lys 167 , Lys 12 , Lys 64 , and Lys 262 . In an even more prefened embodiment, uricase is not pegylated at Lys 156 , Lys 167 , Lys 12 , Lys 64 , Lys 262 , and Lys 117 .
  • uricase is not pegylated at Lys 156 , Lys 167 , Lys 12 , Lys 64 , Lys 262 , Lys 117 , Lys 16 , Lys 28 , and Lys 72 .
  • enzymatic activity is decreased by increasing the number of PEG units on an enzyme.
  • the present inventors have discovered that the enzymatic activity of uricase bound to about twenty PEG-20,000 molecules is actually higher that the enzymatic activity of the uricase-PEG-5,000 when each is bound to the same number of PEG molecules.
  • Such increased activity of uricase-PEG-20,000 allows for treatment using lower doses than previously considered possible.
  • Lower doses of uricase-PEG-20,000 provide the advantages of minimizing immune responses to the uricase-PEG including reducing potential hypersensitivity problems, minimizing anaphalxsis, and lessening the occunence of rashes resulting in patients administered uricase-PEG.
  • the present invention provides methods of reducing uric acid levels in a patient comprising administering to said patient a therapeutically effective amount of a compound comprising uricase covalently bonded via a linking group to polyethylene glycol, wherein the polyethylene glycol has a total weight average molecular weight of from about 10,000 to about 30,000.
  • uricase is modified with polyethylene glycol having a total weight average molecular weight of about 20,000.
  • the present invention provides methods of treating uric acid related disorders in a patient comprising administering to said patient a therapeutically effective amount of a compound comprising uricase covalently bonded via a linking group to polyethylene glycol, wherein the polyethylene glycol has a total weight average molecular weight of from about 10,000 to about 30,000.
  • uricase is modified with polyethylene glycol having a total weight average molecular weight of about 20,000.
  • a therapeutically effective amount of one of the compounds of the present invention is an amount that is effective to reduce uric acid levels.
  • treatment is initiated with small dosages which can be increased by small increments until the optimum effect under the circumstances is achieved.
  • a therapeutic dosage of compounds of the present invention may be from about 1 to about 200 mg/kg twice a week to about once every two weeks.
  • the dosage may be about 1 mg/kg once a week as a 2 ml intravenous injection to about 20 mg/kg once every 3 days.
  • Uricase-PEG20,000 maybe administered several times each day, once a day, once a week, or once every two weeks.
  • PEG-uricase may be mixed with a phosphate buffered saline solution, or any other appropriate solution known to those skilled in the art, prior to injection.
  • the PEG-uricase formulation may be administered as a solid (lyophilate) or as a liquid formulation, as desired.
  • the methods of the present invention can involve either in vitro or in vivo applications.
  • in vitro applications including cell culture applications
  • the compounds described herein can be added to cells in cultures and then incubated.
  • the compounds of the present invention may also be used to facilitate the production of monoclonal and/or polyclonal antibodies, using antibody production techniques well known in the art.
  • the monoclonal and/or polyclonal antibodies can then be used in a wide variety of diagnostic applications, as would be apparent to one skilled in the art.
  • administration of the PEG-uricase composition of the present invention can be carried out, for example, orally, intranasally, intraperitoneally, parenterally, intravenously, intralymphatically, intratumorly, intramuscularly, interstitial ly, intra-arterially, subcutaneously, intraocularly, intrasynovial, transepithelial, and transdermally.
  • Example 1 Isolation of the Candida utilis uricase coding sequence and construction of the expression plasmid.
  • Genomic DNA was isolated from C. utilis (ATCC 9950) and used as the template in PCR for the isolation of the uricase gene.
  • C. utilis was grown lOOmL YPD medium in an incubator shaker at 30° C x 250 rpm. The next day, cells from 50mL of the culture were pelleted by centrifugation at 1500 x g for 10 minutes at room temperature. The pellet was resuspended in 15 ml of SCED buffer, pH 7.5 (1 M sorbitol, 10 mM sodium citrate, pH7.5, 10 mM EDTA, 10 mM DTT). Three mg of LyticaseTM (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, Cat. No.
  • the pellet was resuspended in 10 ml of TE buffer, pH 7.4 (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 1 mM EDTA). The solution was gently extracted with an equal volume of phenolxhloroform (1:1 v/v) followed by an equal volume of chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (24: 1). One half volume of 7.5 M ammonium acetate, pH 7.5, and 2 volumes of ethanol was added and the tube placed at -70°C for 10 minutes. The DNA was pelleted centrifuge at 10,000 x g for 10 minutes at 4°C. The pellet was air dried the and resuspended in 1 ml of TE buffer, pH 7.5 containing 50 ⁇ g RNase A.
  • the DNA was incubated at room temperature for 1 hour and then reprecipitated with an equal volume of ethanol.
  • the DNA was pelleted by centrifugation at 10,000 x g for 10 minutes at 4°C.
  • the pellet was resuspended in 1 ml TE buffer, pH 7.5.
  • the concentration of the DNA was detenriined by measuring the optical density at 260 nm.
  • PCR was used to isolated the uricase gene from the C. utilis genomic DNA.
  • the primers for the PCR have the following sequences: Forward primer, URIUforSna: 5'- GTG TAC GTA ATG TCA ACA ACG CTC TCA TCA -3' (SEQ. ID. NO.1)
  • Reverse primer URIUrevH: 5'- AGA AAG CTT TTA CCA CTT GGT CTT CTC CTT A -3' (SEQ. ID. NO.2)
  • PCR primers place a SnaB I site at the 5' end of the coding sequence and a Hind III site at the 3' end for subcloning into pQE70 (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) for expression.
  • the PCR mixture contained IX Vent polymerase buffer, 2.5 mM magnesium sulfate, 0.2 mM each dNTPs, 30 pmole of each primer, 1.8 ⁇ g of C. utilis genomic DNA and 2.5 U Vent polymerase (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA) in a 50 ⁇ l final reaction volume. PCR was carried out at 98°C for 2 minutes, followed by 30 cycles of 98°C for 30 seconds, 55°C for 30 seconds and 72°C for 60 seconds.
  • Taq polymerase (Gibco, Rockville, MD) was then added and the reaction incubated at 72°C for 7 minutes. Twenty ml of the PCR was run on an 0.8% agarose gel. The PCR product was excised from the gel and extracted using the Qiagen gel extraction kit. The PCR product was subcloned into pCR2.1 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). The uricase PCR product was excised from pCR2.1 using SnaB I and Hind III and purified by agarose gel electrophoresis.
  • pQE70 was digested with Sph I at 37° C for 1 hour, treated with Klenow fragment at room temperature for 15 minutes to create blunt ends, and then incubated at 80°C for 15 minutes to inactivate the Klenow enzyme.
  • the treated plasmid was then digested with Hind III at 37°C for 1 hour, run on an agarose gel and then purified from the gel.
  • the uricase fragment was then ligated into the digested pQE70 to create pQE-URIC.
  • E. coli DG101 ATCC 47041
  • transformants were selected in the presence of ampicillin.
  • Transformants were screened for uricase production by growing cells in 3 mL LB containing ampicillin (100 mg/mL) until the OD600 reached 0.5 to 0.6. Isopropyl -b- D-galactopyranoside (IPTG) was added to 1 mM final concentration and the cultures incubated for an additional 2 hours. Cell extracts were then analysed by SDS- polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and gels examined for the presence of a 34,000 Da protein. One transformant found to produce a 34,000 Da protein was tested and found to have uricase activity. pQE-URIC was isolated from this transformant and the gene for tetracycline resistance was inserted into the plasmid.
  • IPTG Isopropyl -b- D-galactopyranoside
  • pBR322 For insertion of the gene conferring tetracycline resistance into pQE-URIC, pBR322 was digested with Eco RI and Ava I, and then treated with Klenow polymerase and dNTPs to create blunt ends on the digested DNA fragments. pQE-URIC was digested with Xbal and then treated with Klenow polymerase and dNTPs. The -1400 bp fragment from pBR322 containing the tetracycline resistance gene was gel purified and ligated into pQE-URIC to create pPHX12.
  • Example 2 Expression of uricase in E. coli.
  • E. coli non-defined medium #1 was used for the growth of PHX12 in a Bioflo IV Benchtop Fermentor (New Brunswick Scientific, Edison, NJ).
  • Components of E. coli non-defined medium #1 consist of Basal Medium, 50 % glycerol, 100X salts solution, 100X calcium chloride solution, and 1000X vitamin solution. These components are prepared as described below.
  • Basal Medium Per Liter of Medium casamino acids 30 g ammonium sulfate 3 g potassium phosphate, dibasic 2.5 g
  • Vitamin solution 1000 X
  • thiamine hydrochloride 0.26 g
  • E. coli Non-defined Medium #1 was used for the growth of PHX12 in the fermentor.
  • E. coli Non-defined Basal Medium was prepared by dissolving 600 g casamino acids, 60 g ammonium sulfate, and 50 g potassium phosphate, dibasic, in 2 L of nanopure water. The fermentor was filled with 18.4 L of Basal Medium, 50 mL of Antifoam B was added to the Basal Medium and then sterilized using the sterilization cycle of the fermentor set at 121°C for 30 minutes.
  • the medium was allowed to cool to 37°C or below and 200 mL of 100X calcium chloride solution, 200 mL of 100X concentrated salts solution, 20 mL of 1000X vitamin solution, and 1200 mL of 50% glycerol solution was aseptically added to the fermentor.
  • Parameters of the fermentation were as follows: Agitation was set to 700 rpm, the temperature was set to 37°C, and the air flow was set at 20 Lpm. The inoculum was then used to seed the fermentor. The culture was grown in the fermentor to an optical density (A600nm) of approximately 8. IPTG was then aseptically added to the fermentor to a final concentration of 1 mM. The fermentation was allowed to continue for 2 hours after the addition of IPTG. The cells were then harvested and then immediately concentrated to 2 to 3 L by diafiltration using a hollow fiber filter. The cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 8,000 x g for 10 minutes and the cell paste was transfened to plastic storage containers and stored at -70°C until further processed. A typical 20 liter fermentation produced 0.5 to 0.6 Kg of cell paste.
  • Cell paste from a 20 L fermentation was resuspended in 0.4 L of Lysis buffer (20 mM sodium phosphate, pH 8.5, 1 mM EDTA) using a PolytronTM homogenizer to achieve a homogenous suspension.
  • Lysis buffer (20 mM sodium phosphate, pH 8.5, 1 mM EDTA)
  • the cells were lysed by passing two times through a microfluidizer at >15,000 psi.
  • the lysed cell suspension was then centrifuged at 13,000 x g for 10 minutes. Ammonium sulfate was added to the supernatant to achieve 30% saturation.
  • the suspension was stined at room temperature for 10 minutes and then centrifuged at 13,000 x g for 15 minutes.
  • Ammonium sulfate was added to the supernatant to 64% saturation and the solution was stined at room temperature for 10 minutes and the solution was then centrifuged at 13,000 x g for 15 minutes. The pellet was resuspended in 0.4 L of Diafiltration buffer (20 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 8.5) and diafiltered against 5 volumes of Diafiltration Buffer using a filter with a 50,000 MW cutoff. The diafiltered solution was then applied to a Poros HQ50 column previously equilibrated with Column Buffer (20 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 8.5). The column was washed with Column Buffer and the flow through collected.
  • Diafiltration buffer (20 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 8.5
  • the flow through material was then applied to a BioRad HA column equilibrated with Column Buffer.
  • the HA column was washed with 10 volumes of Column Buffer and the uricase eluted by running a gradient from 100%) Column Buffer to 100% 0.5 M sodium phosphate, pH 8.5.
  • the eluted uricase was again passed over a Poros HQ column equilibrated with Column Buffer.
  • the flow through fraction containing the uricase was collected and stored at 4°C.
  • Example 4 Characterization of purified uricase Uricase assay Uricase activity was assayed using the uric acid diagnostic kit from Sigma (St.
  • the specific activity of the enzyme was determined by incubating the enzyme with uric acid and monitoring the production of hydrogen peroxide.
  • the production of hydrogen peroxide is determined by reaction with 4-aminoantipyrine and 3,5-dichloro-2- hydroxybenzenesulfonate in the presence of peroxidase.
  • a quinoeimine dye is formed with an absorbance maximum at 520 nm.
  • the intensity of the color produced is directly proportional to the amount of hydrogen peroxide formed.
  • the amount of hydrogen peroxide formed is determined by comparison with standards containing known amounts of hydrogen peroxide.
  • Specific Enzyme activity nmol of hydrogen peroxide produced/min/mg of protein in the assay. Enzyme activity is expressed in IU/mL. 1 JJ is defined as that amount of enzyme which produces 1 nmol of hydrogen peroxide/min.
  • the expression level of the uricase was determined by SDS-PAGE. Samples (1 ml) from the 20 L fermentation culture were taken prior to the IPTG induction (pre-induction sample) of the uricase expression, and 2 hours following the addition of IPTG (post- induction sample). These samples were quickly centrifuged in a micro-centrifuge (12,000 x g for 1 min) then frozen at -70°C. The frozen cell pellet of was resuspended in 1 ml of water and sonicated for 15 sec with a probe sonicator. The resulting sonicate was electrophoresed on a 10-20% SDS-PAGE gel run under reducing conditions. The gels were stained using Coomassie Blue.
  • Example 5 Pegylation
  • Purified uricase in Column Buffer (20 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 8.5) was pegylated with methoxy-SS-polyethyleneglycol MW 5,000 at a ratio of PEG to uricase of 30: 1 (wt/wt).
  • the PEG 5000 was added to the uricase solution and stined for 1 hour at room temperature.
  • the conjugated uricase-PEG 5000 was concentrated by diafiltration to approximately 1/10 volume and then diafiltered against 10 volumes of Formulation Buffer (20 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 6.8, 130 mM sodium chloride).
  • Pegylation of uricase with PEG-20,000 Purified uricase in Column Buffer (20 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 8.5) was pegylated with methoxy-SS-polyethyleneglycol MW-20,000 at a ratio of PEG to uricase of 30:1 (wt/wt).
  • the PEG 20000 was added to the uricase solution and stirred for 2 hours at room temperature.
  • the conjugated uricase-PEG-20000 was concentrated by diafiltration to approximately 1/10 volume and then diafiltered against 10 volumes of Formulation Buffer (20 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 6.8, 130 mM sodium chloride).
  • TNBS trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid
  • Each protein sample was assayed at three different protein concentrations. Each concentration was assayed in duplicate. The protein concentration of each sample was adjusted to 0.2, 0.4 and 0.8 mg/mL with nanopure water and vortexed for 3 to 5 seconds. 0.25 mL of each protein sample was added into a 10 x 75 mm glass tube. 0.25 mL of 4% sodium bicarbonate was added to each tube followed by 0.25 mL of 0.1% TNBS. Tubes were incubated for 2 hours at 40° C. The tubes were then removed from the heating block and 0.25 mL of 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) added to each tube followed by 0.125 mL of IN HCl. The absorbance of each reaction was measured at 335 nm. The absorbances of the protein samples were plotted and linear regression was performed to determine the slope of the line. The number of primary amine residues pegylated was determined by the following formula:
  • Number of primary amines pegylated 1 -(slope of pegylated protein/ slope of unpegylated protein) x total number of primary amine residues in the protein
  • uricase-PEG-20,000 retains a higher specific activity than the uricase-PEG-5,000 even though the same average number of PEG molecules are attached to the protein.
  • Uricase- PEG 20,000 retains 75% of the specific activity of the native enzyme, while uricase- PEG 5,000 retains only 56% of the native enzyme's activity. This means that less of the uricase-PEG 20,000 can be used to produce a given enzymatic activity than would be required if uricase-PEG 5,000 were being used.
  • the enzymatic activity of uricase-PEG failed to increase relative to PEG-20,000 when PEGs larger than 20,000 were covalently bonded to uricase.
  • the average molecular weight of the PEG covalently bonded to uricase also plays an important role in determining both circulating half-life and production yield.
  • the yield of uricase-PEG increases with increasing average molecular weight of the bound polyethylene glycol as the average molecular weight of the PEGs increases up to PEG-20,000.
  • the yield of uricase-PEG decreased significantly.
  • the relative yield is 1.0.
  • the relative yield is about 0.5.
  • the relative yield is about 0.66.
  • the relative yield drops to about 0.1.
  • Example 9 Application to Humans
  • the circulating half life of PEG conjugated uricase has a circulating half life that is 5 to 10 times longer than the same fonnulations in mice. What this has meant in the past is that the human dose is most often 1/5 to 1/10 of that used in mice. Accordingly, the circulating half-life of PEG-uricase should circulate even longer in humans than it does in mice.

Abstract

The present invention is directed to uricase modified with polyethylene glycol and to methods of treating different illnesses characterized by increased circulating uric acid levels, including but not limited to, hyperuricemia and tumor lysis syndrome.

Description

PEG-MODIFIED URICASE
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is directed to uricase modified with polyethylene glycol and to methods for treating number of different illnesses characterized by increased circulating uric acid levels.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Uric acid is a product of purine metabolism in birds, reptiles, and primates, including humans. Uric acid is produced in the liver by oxidation of xanthine and hypoxanthine. Xanthine is an intermediate in the catabolism of guanine nucleotides while hypoxanthine is produced during the breakdown of adenine nucleotides. In most mammals, uric acid is further oxidized by the enzyme urate oxidase to allantoin. Allantoin, because of its lost pyrimidine ring, shows a more than 20 times greater water solubility than uric acid. Urate oxidase, also called uricase, is an enzyme of the purine degradation pathway. Uricase catalyzes the conversion of uric acid + O2 into allantoin + CO2.
Humans lack uricase and do not produce allantonin. This is the result of a mutation that introduces a premature termination codon in the coding sequence of the human uricase gene (Wu et al, J. Mol. Evol. 34:78-84, 1992; Wu et al, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91 :742-6, 1994, each of which are incorporated by reference). As a consequence of this mutation, purine catabolism in humans terminates with the production of uric acid which is relatively insoluble (the solubility index in distilled water is 13.2 mg/dl) making humans susceptible to a pathological condition known as hyperuricemia. Renal handling of uric acid is complex and requires glomerular filtration, reabsorption of filtered urate, tubular secretion, and finally postsecretory reabsorption.
Hyperuricemia is defined as occurring when the serum level of uric acid is above 8 mg/dl. Hyperuricemia can result in the formation of uric acid crystals in the serum, which can precipitate in joints, skin and kidneys. This can result in inflammation of the joints (gout), renal failure, metabolic acidosis, and hyperkalemia. Overproduction of uric acid can have a variety of origins, including congenital metabolic defects, Lesch-Nyhan syndrome, excess ingestion of purine or proteins, and treatments with uricosuric drugs (Kelley, W.N. and Wortman, R. L. Textbook of Rheumatology, 5th edition, pp 1313-1351, 1997; which is incorporated by reference). Hyperuricemia is also found in patients that have had heart or kidney transplants and are being treated with immunosupressive agents. Hyperuricemia can lead to the loss of kidney function in these patients and can produce significant morbidity and mortality.
Hyperuricemia is also found in patients with malignant diseases. Chemotherapy and radiation therapy of cancer patients can induce a life-threatening condition known as tumor lysis syndrome (Kalemkerian, G. P., Darwish, B., and Varterasian, M. L. Am J. Med. 103, 363-367, 1997; Lorigan, P.C., Woodings, P. L., Morgenstern, G. R., and Scarffe, J. H. Ann Oncol. 7, 631-636, 1996; Hande, K. R., and Garrow, G. C. Am. J. Med. 94, 133-139, 1993). Hematologic malignancies, such as leukemias and lymphomas, are responsible for most cases of tumor lysis syndrome. Tumor lysis syndrome is characterized by the rapid development of hyperuricemia, hyperkalemia, hyperphosphatemia, and acute renal failure. Acute renal failure is the result of the intrarenal precipitation of uric acid. Tumor lysis syndrome is often triggered by cell death induced by chemotherapy or radiotherapy, resulting in the release of intracellular substances. However, occasionally cancer patients with a heavy tumor burden may exhibit hyperuricemia and other features of tumor lysis syndrome even in the absence of radiotherapy or chemotherapy because of the high turnover of malignant cells with subsequent catabolism of released purines into uric acid.
Therapy for the prevention and treatment of the acute renal failure associated with tumor lysis syndrome is a considerable challenge and is currently unsatisfactory for a number of reasons. Methods of treating hyperuricemia include hydration, urinary alkalinization, osmotic diuresis and allopurinol therapy. However, the difficulty in the treatment of hyperuricemia lies in the potential for aggravating other consequences of tumor lysis syndrome. For example, alkalinization of urine to increase uric acid solubility facilitates precipitation of calcium phosphate. Allopurinol (4-hydroxypurinol), an analogue of xanthine, has long been the standard treatment for hyperuricemia and also for the prevention of tumor lysis syndrome. Allopurinol is converted to oxypurinol, which then binds to and inhibits xanthine oxidase, the enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of hypoxanthine and xanthine to uric acid. As a result, uric acid production is inhibited, and xanthine and hypoxanthine concentrations increase. However, allopurinol does not remove uric acid that is already present and deposited intrarenally as crystals. As a result, it is often several days (sometimes 10-14 days) from the initial treatment with allopurinol before a significant decrease in uric acid in serum can be observed. While the solubilities of xanthine and hypoxanthine are only slightly greater than that of uric acid, the purines are catabolized to xanthine, hypoxanthine, and uric acid during allopurinol treatment, rather than mostly to uric acid. The result is that the urinary concentration of uric acid decreases below its solubility and further formation of uric acid crytstals is prevented. However, during excessive catabolism of purines, allopurinol therapy may lead to intrarenal precipitation of hypoxanthine and xanthine, with further aggravation of acute renal failure. This situation has been well documented in clinical practice. Furthermore, allopurinol therapy is also associated with significant toxicity and can cause death. Allopurinol can produce severe toxic effects, including cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions, leukopenia, and hepatomegaly. This drug has been also implicated in the induction of tubulointerstitial nephritis. In addition, allopurinol may cause adverse drug interactions, as has been shown for 6-meιcaptopurine and adenine arabinoside, drugs often used to treat lymphoproliferative disease and leukemia (Lauter, CB, Bailey, EJ, Lerner, AM. J Infect. Dis 1976; 134, 75-79). Finally, although allopurinol can block the formation of uric acid, it does little to solubilize the uric acid which is already present. All of these adverse effects sometimes make allopurinol ineffective for the treatment of acute hyperuricemia in tumor patients. Thus allopurinol is not an ideal drug for the treatment of hyperuricemia. Dialysis and continuous ateriovenous hemodialysis are additional methods that are used to remove uric acid in patients with hyperuricemia. However, these treatment methods are problematic in patients with malignancies because of the risk for severe bleeding caused by thrombocytopenia or the need for anticoagulation. Furthermore, because of the invasive nature of these treatments, there is an increased risk for fatal infections in patients who are in many instances immunocompromised due to their illness or therapy they have received.
Uricase has been shown to be an effective treatment for hyperuricemia and tumor lysis syndrome (London, M., and Hudson, P. B. Science, 125, 937-938, 1957; Oberling, F. and Lang, J. M. Nouvelle Presse Med 3, 2026, 1974; Robert, A., Corberand, J. and Regnier, C. Rev. Med. Toulouse 12, 1093-1100, 1976; Masera, G., et. al., J. Pediatrics 100, 152-155, 1982; Jankovic, M., et. al. Am. J. Pediatr. Hematol. Onocol. 7, 202-204, 1985; Masera, G. and Jankovic, M. Ann. Oncol. 8, 407, 1996; Jones, D. P, Mahmoud, H. and Chesney, R. W. Pediatr. Nephrol. 9, 206-212, 1995). Treatment with uricase converts uric acid into the highly soluble allantoin. Furthermore, uricase, if adequately filtered into the urine, may even dissolve already precipitated uric acid crystals and improve renal function.
Uricase has a number of advantages in the treatment of hyperuricemia and nephrolithiasis including the speed of the hypouricemic effect (reduction of hyperuricemia of the order of 50% in less than 24 h) and better protection of the kidney against lithiasis compared with other drugs such as allopurinol. Uricase is only available in a few countries, currently limiting the use of this therapy. Uricase extracted from Aspergillus flavus through a complex manufacturing process, has been commercially available from Sanofi (Clin-Midy, Paris, France) under the trade name Uricozyme in France since 1975 and in Italy since the early 1980s. This drug has been extensively studied in Europe and has been shown to be very effective in rapidly lowering levels of uric acid in patients within minutes of administration (Oberling, F. and Lang, J. M. Nouvelle Presse Med 3, 2026, 1974; Robert, A., Corberand, J. and Regnier, C. Rev. Med. Toulouse 12, 1093-1100, 1976). This treatment is used very often in patients to prevent tumor lysis syndrome. In one study involving over 400 patients, uricase treatment effectively eliminated tumor lysis syndrome (Masera, G. and Jankovic, M. Ann. Oncol. 8, 407, 1996). In the United States, Uricozyme has been extensively tested by a group of investigators at St. Jude Childrens Hospital and the University of Tennessee (Pui, C.-H., et al. Leukemia, 11, 1813-1816, 1997). These investigators treated 126 children in a 3 year period and found uricase treatment to be much more rapid and effective in reducing serum uric acid levels than allopurinol. Furthermore, none of the uricase treated individuals developed tumor lysis syndrome or required dialysis. Although oncologists are well aware of the potential advantages of uricase, this therapy has not been widely recognized in the renal community. An obstacle for a more general application of uricase in hyperuricemia may be the complicated manufacturing process of the enzyme involving fermentation, extraction, and purification, which clearly limits its commercial availability, as well as the standardization of enzyme activity. The uricase currently used as a drug is obtained by culturing Aspergillus flavus and isolating the enzyme from the culture medium by extraction, followed by several purification steps. While it is possible to obtain highly purified uricase, this method has disadvantages. Aspergillus flavus is not easy to work with because of its physiology and genetics (WOLOSHUK et al. Applied Environ. Microbiol., 55, 86-90, 1989), making it difficult to obtain strains that can produce substantial amounts of the enzyme. Aspergillus flavus can also produce aflatoxins, which can be difficult to remove during the purification process. The purified uricase must be checked to ensure that it is free from these toxins. In addition, because of the foreign nature of the Aspergillus enzyme, therapy is many times limited to a single dose due to the risk of hypersensitivity reactions. Although uricase has been tested in the United States, it is not an approved therapy because of the of a high incidence of allergic reactions to this foreign protein. The clinical use of uricase is also compromised by its short circulating half-life. (See, Park et al, Anticancer Res., 1:373-6 (1981).
Hypersensitivity to uricase and the short circulating half-life of uricase can be overcome by the covalent attachment of polyethylene glycol (PEG) (Chen, R. H.-L., et. al. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 660, 293-298, 1981; Nishimara, H., Matsushima, A. and Inada, Y. Enzyme, 26, 49-53, 1981; Savoca, K. V., Davis, F. F. and Palczuk, N. C. Int. Archs. Allegy Appl. Immun. 75, 58-67, 1984; Tsuji, J.-L, et. al. Int. J. Immunopharmac. 7, 725- 730, 1985). The attachment of PEG to proteins has been shown to greatly reduce the antigenicity of foreign proteins. For example, formulating a heterologous protein with polyethylene glycol (PEG) to reduce the antigenicity has been proven with the approval of Oncaspar (E. coli Asparaginase). Previous investigators have attached PEG (Molecular Weight 5000) to uricase and successfully treated a small number of patients (Davis, S., Park, Y. K., Abuchowski, A. and Davis, F. F. Lancet 2, 281-283, 1981; Chua, C. C, et. al. Ann. Intern. Med. 109, 114-117, 1988). Davis et. al. (1981) treated patients with a single dose of PEG-uricase (uricase isolated from Candida utilis) (120 IU/m2 surface area, intravenously). Serum uric acid fell to undetectable levels within 60 minutes after injection, and remained undetectable for at least 32 hours. The serum half-life of PEG- 5,000 uricase was 6 hours. The half-life of native (unpegylated) uricase was noted to be less than 4 hours in other studies. Precipitating antibodies to PEG-uricase or native uricase were not detected in any patient. Davis et al. noted that PEG-5,000 uricase offered a potentially major therapeutic advantage over native uricase in the treatment of hyperuricemic diseases. Chua, et al. (1988) treated a patient with Non-Hodgkin lymphoma with uricase purified from Arthrobacter protoformiae modifed with PEG- 5,000. The patient was treated by intramuscular injection on four separate days. Serum uric acid level fell sharply after each dose. No antibodies to either PEG-5,000 uricase or native uricase were detected through the 26th day post dosing. Chua et al. concluded that PEG-5000 uricase may be useful for treating hyperuricemia in the setting of advanced hematologic malignancies.
There is a need for the more efficient production and formulation of uricase whereby the disadvantages associated with the use of uricase in the treatment of patients with high uric acid levels as discussed above can be overcome. The present invention is directed to these, as well as other, important ends.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention addresses the needs identified above in that it provides formulations of uricase which overcome the disadvantages of uricase compositions used to date.
The present invention is directed to uricase modified with polyethylene glycol. In a preferred embodiment, uricase is modified with polyethylene glycol having a total weight average molecular weight of about 10,000 to about 50,000, directly or through a biocompatible linking group. In a more preferred embodiment, uricase is modified with polyethylene glycol having a total weight average molecular weight of about 10,000 to about 30,000. In an even more preferred embodiment, uricase is modified with polyethylene glycol having a total weight average molecular weight of about 20,000.
Another embodiment of the invention is directed to methods of treating uric acid related diseases including hyperuricemia, tumor lysis syndrome, and nephrolithiasis, among others, comprising administering a therapeutically effective amount of a compound comprising PEG-modified uricase. In a preferred embodiment uricase is modified with polyethylene glycol having a total weight average molecular weight of about 20,000. In some embodiments the present invention provides methods of enhancing the circulating half life of uricase comprising modifying said uricase by covalently bonding said uricase via a linking group to polyethylene glycol, wherein the polyethylene glycol has a total weight average molecular weight of about 10,000 to about 30,000, and wherein the linking group is selected from the group consisting of a succinimide group, an amide group, an imide group, a carbamate group, an ester group, an epoxy group, a carboxyl group, a hydroxyl group, a carbohydrate, a tyrosine group, a cysteine group, a histidine group and combinations thereof.
In some embodiments the present invention provides methods of enhancing the anti-uric acid activity of uricase comprising modifying said uricase by covalently bonding said uricase via a linking group to polyethylene glycol, wherein the polyethylene glycol has a total weight average molecular weight of from about 10,000 to about 30,000, and wherein the linking group is selected from the group consisting of a succinimide group, an amide group, an imide group, a carbamate group, an ester group, an epoxy group, a carboxyl group, a hydroxyl group, a carbohydrate, a tyrosine group, a cysteine group, a histidine group and combinations thereof. In some embodiments, the present invention provides methods of reducing uric acid levels in a patient comprising administering to said patient a therapeutically effective amount of a compound comprising uricase covalently bonded via a linking group to polyethylene glycol, wherein the polyethylene glycol has a total weight average molecular weight of from about 10,000 to about 30,000. In a preferred embodiment uricase is modified with polyethylene glycol having a total weight average molecular weight of about 20,000. In some embodiments the present invention provides methods of treating uric acid related disorders in a patient comprising administering to said patient a therapeutically effective amount of a compound comprising uricase covalently bonded via a linking group to polyethylene glycol, wherein the polyethylene glycol has a total weight average molecular weight of from about 10,000 to about 30,000. In a prefened embodiment uricase is modified with polyethylene glycol having a total weight average molecular weight of about 20,000.
In some embodiments, the present invention provides a compound comprising uricase coupled to polyethylene glycol, without a linking group wherein the polyethylene glycol has a total weight average molecular weight of about 10,000 to about 30,000. In a preferred embodiment uricase is modified with polyethylene glycol having a total weight average molecular weight of about 20,000.
These and other aspects of the present invention will be elucidated in the following detailed description of the invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION Overview
Uricase may be found in many microorganisms and is useful for the treatment of many diseases and disorders in humans. However, uricase is antigenic and rapidly cleared from circulation in a patient. These problems may be overcome by covalently modifying uricase with polyethylene glycol (PEG).
The present invention is based on the discovery that uricase modified with polyethylene glycol provides excellent results in treating certain types of diseases and disorders related to elevated levels of uric acid in humans. When compared to native uricase, uricase-PEG retains most of its enzymatic activity, is far less antigenic, has a greatly extended circulating half-life, and is much more efficacious in the treatment of diseases and disorders including hyperuricemia and tumor lysis syndrome, among others. PEG-20,000 is especially preferred as it possesses prefened enzymatic activity levels, antigenicity, circulating half-life, efficacy, and relative ease of manufacture. Definitions
Throughout the present disclosure, the following abbreviations may be used: PEG, polyethylene glycol; SS, succinimidyl succinate; SSA, succinimidyl succinamide; SPA, succinimidyl propionate; and NHS, N-hydroxy-succinimide. Uricase covalently modified with polyethylene glycol (with or without a linking group) may be hereinafter referred to as "uricase-PEG", "urate oxidase-PEG", or "PEG- uricase".
"Polyethylene glycol" or "PEG" refers to mixtures of condensation polymers of ethylene oxide and water, in a branched or straight chain, represented by the general formula H(OCH2CH2)nOH, wherein n is at least 4. "Polyethylene glycol" or "PEG" is used in combination with a numeric suffix to indicate the approximate weight average molecular weight thereof. For example, PEG-5,000 refers to polyethylene glycol having a total weight average molecular weight of about 5,000; PEG-12,000 refers to polyethylene glycol having a total weight average molecular weight of about 12,000; and PEG-20,000 refers to polyethylene glycol having a total weight average molecular weight of about 20,000.
As used herein, the term "patient" refers to an animal, preferably a mammal, and more preferably a human.
As used herein, the term "uric acid related disease" refers to diseases and disorders characterized by elevated levels of uric acid. Uric acid related disorders include without limitation, hyperuricemia, tumor lysis syndrome, and nephrolithiasis, among others.
As used herein, the term "about" refers to +/- 10% of the value.
As used herein, the term "biocompatible" refers to materials or compounds which are generally not injurious to biological functions and which will not result in any degree of unacceptable toxicity, including allergenic and disease states.
"Circulating half life" refers to the period of time, after injection of the modified uricase into a patient, until a quantity of the uricase has been cleared to levels one half of the original peak serum level. Circulating half life may be determined in any relevant species, including humans or mice. As used herein, the terms "covalently bonded" and "coupled" are used interchangeably and refer a covalent bond linking uricase to the PEG molecule, either directly or through a linker. Uricase In the present invention, the uricase gene may be derived, cloned or produced from any source, including, for example, from microorganisms, or via recombinant biotechnology, or any combination thereof. For example, uricase may be cloned from microorganisms including but not limited to Asperigillus flavus, Candida utilis, and Arthrobacter protoformiae. In some embodiments, the uricase used in the present invention may have the amino acid sequence set forth in the appended Sequence Listing. Uricase may also may cloned from a large number of other organisms, including but not limited to bacteria, of the genera Streptomyces and Bacillus; fungi, (including the yeast) of the genera Saccharomyces, Schizosaccaromyces, Emericella, Aspergillus, and Neurospora; the fruit fly (Drosophila); mammals, including pig (Sus scrofa), squirrel monkey (Samiri sciureus), baboon (Papio), and rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta); and plants including the chickpea (Cicer arietinum), common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris), potato (Solanum tuberosum) and pea (Pisum sativum). Polyethylene Glycol
There are many polyethylene glycols available that differ in their molecular weight and linking group. These PEGs can have varying effects on the antigencity, immunogenicity and circulating half-life of a protein (Zalipsky, S. and Lee, C. Polyethylene Glycol Chemistry: Biotechnical and Biomedical Applications. Pp. 347-370, Plenum Press, New York, 1992; Monfardini, C, et. al. bioconjugate Chem. 6, 62-69, 1995; Delgado C; Francis GE; Fisher D. The uses and properties of PEG-linked proteins. Crit. Rev. Ther. Drug Carrier Sys., 9:249-304, 1992.)
In one embodiment of the present invention, the polyethylene glycol has a total weight average molecular weight of about 10,000 to about 50,000; more preferably from about 12,000 to about 40,000, more preferably from about 15,000 to about 30,000; and most preferably about 20,000. Generally, polyethylene glycol with a molecular weight of 30,000 or more is difficult to dissolve, and yields of the formulated product are greatly reduced. The polyethylene glycol may be a branched or straight chain, preferably a straight chain. Increasing the molecular weight of the polyethylene glycol generally tends to decrease the immunogenicity of the uricase. The polyethylene glycols having the molecular weights described in the present invention may be used in conjunction with uricase, and, optionally, a biocompatible linking group, to treat diseases and disorders relating to elevated levels of uric acid. Pegylation
Uricase may be covalently bonded to PEG via a biocompatible linking group, using methods known in the art, as described, for example, by Park et al, Anticancer Res., 1:373- 376 (1981); and Zaplipsky and Lee, Polyethylene Glycol Chemistry: Biotechnical and Biomedical Applications, J.M. Harris, ed., Plenum Press, NY, Chapter 21 (1992), the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
The linking group used to covalently attach PEG to uricase may be any biocompatible linking group. As discussed above, "biocompatible" indicates that the compound or group is non-toxic and may be utilized in vitro or in vivo without causing injury, sickness, disease or death. PEG can be bonded to the linking group, for example, via an ether bond, an ester bond, a thiol bond or an amide bond. Suitable biocompatible linking groups include, for example, an ester group, an amide group, an imide group, a carbamate group, a carboxyl group, a hydroxyl group, a carbohydrate, a succinimide group (including, for example, succinimidyl succinate (SS), succinimidyl propionate (SPA), succinimidyl carboxymethylate (SCM), succinimidyl succinamide (SSA) or N-hydroxy succinimide (NHS)), an epoxide group, an oxycarbonylimidazole group (including, for example, carbonyldimidazole (CDI)), a nitro phenyl group (including, for example, nitrophenyl carbonate (NPC) or trichlorophenyl carbonate (TPC)), a trysylate group, an aldehyde group, an isocyanate group, a vinylsulfone group, a tyrosine group, a cysteine group, a histidine group or a primary amine. Preferably, the biocompatible linking group is an ester group and/or a succinimide group. More preferably, the linking group is SS, SPA, SCM, SSA or NHS; with SS, SPA or NHS being more preferred, and with SS or SPA being most prefened. In the present invention, a common feature of the most preferred biocompatible linking groups is that they attach to a primary amine of uricase via a maleimide group. Once coupled with uricase, SS-PEG has an ester linkage next to the PEG, which may render this site sensitive to serum esterase, which may release PEG from uricase in the body. SPA-PEG and PEG2-NHS do not have an ester linkage, so they are not sensitive to serum esterase. In the present invention, the particular linking groups do not appear to influence the circulating half- life of PEG-uricase or its specific enzyme activity. However, if a linking group is used, it is important to use a biocompatible linking group. The PEG which is attached to the protein may be either a single chain, as with SS-PEG, SPA-PEG and SC- PEG, or a branched chain of PEG may be used, as with PEG2-NHS. Alternatively, uricase may be coupled directly to PEG (i.e., without a linking group) through an amino group, a sulfhydral group, a hydroxyl group or a carboxyl group. In a prefened embodiment, PEG is coupled to lysine residues on uricase.
Uricase-PEG
The attachment of PEG to uricase increases the circulating half- life of uricase. The number of PEG units on uricase appears to be related to the circulating half life of the enzyme, while the amount of retained enzymatic activity appears related to the average molecular weight of the PEG used.
It is known that increasing the number of PEG units on uricase decreases the enzymatic activity of the enzyme. Also, it is known that some PEG formulations are difficult to yield and yield relatively low amounts of product. Thus, to achieve an efficacious product, a balance needs to be achieved among circulating half-life, antigenicity, efficiency of production, and enzymatic activity.
Generally, PEG is attached to a primary amine of uricase. Selection of the attachment site of polyethylene glycol on the uricase is determined by the role of each of the sites within the active domain of the protein, as would be known to the skilled artisan.
PEG may be attached to the primary amines of uricase without substantial loss of enzymatic activity. As discussed above however, the amount of retained enzymatic activity appears to be related to the average molecular weight of the PEG used. For example, uricase cloned from C. utilis has about 32 lysines that may be pegylated by this procedure. In other words, the 32 lysines are all possible points at which uricase can be attached to PEG via a biocompatible linking group, such as SS, SPA, SCM, SSA and/or NHS. PEG may also be attached to other sites on uricase, either via a linking group or by direct attachment to a group on one or more residues, as would be apparent to one skilled in the art in view of the present disclosure. From 1 to about 32 PEG molecules may be covalently bonded to uricase at lysine residues. Preferably, uricase is modified with about 5 to about 30 PEG molecules, more preferably from about 10 to about 25 PEG molecules, more preferably from about 18 to about 22 PEG molecules and most preferably about 20 PEG molecules. In other words, about 15% to about 95% of the primary amino groups in uricase are modified with PEG, more preferably about 55% to about 70% of the primary amino groups in uricase are modified with PEG and most preferably about 60% of the primary amino groups in uricase are modified with PEG. When PEG is covalently bonded to the end terminus of uricase, preferably only 1 PEG molecule is utilized. In a prefened embodiment, uricase is modified with PEG-20,000. Uricase may be pegylated at many different sites. In a prefened embodiment, uricase is pegylated at sites other than one or more of the following (numbers refer to the amino acid residue of C. utilis uricase): Lys12, Lys16, Lys28, Lys64, Lys72, Lys117, Lys156, Lys167, and Lys262. In some prefened embodiments, uricase is pegylated with about twenty PEG-20,000 molecules. In one such prefened embodiment, uricase is not pegylated at Lys156. In another prefened embodiment, uricase is not pegylated at Lys167. In another prefened embodiment, uricase is not pegylated at Lys12. In another prefened embodiment, uricase is not pegylated at Lys64. In another prefened embodiment, uricase is not pegylated at Lys262. In another prefened embodiment, uricase is not pegylated at Lys64. In another prefened embodiment, uricase is not pegylated at Lys262. In another prefened embodiment, uricase is not pegylated at Lys117. In another prefened embodiment, uricase is not pegylated at Lys16. In another prefened embodiment, uricase is not pegylated at Lys28. In another prefened embodiment, uricase is not pegylated at Lys72. In a more prefened embodiment, uricase is not pegylated at Lys156 and Lys167. In a more preferred embodiment, uricase is not pegyolated at Lys156, Lys167, Lys12, Lys64, and Lys262. In an even more prefened embodiment, uricase is not pegylated at Lys156, Lys167, Lys12, Lys64, Lys262, and Lys117. In a most prefened embodiment, uricase is not pegylated at Lys156, Lys167, Lys12, Lys64, Lys262, Lys117, Lys16, Lys28, and Lys72.
As discussed, it is known that enzymatic activity is decreased by increasing the number of PEG units on an enzyme. However, the present inventors have discovered that the enzymatic activity of uricase bound to about twenty PEG-20,000 molecules is actually higher that the enzymatic activity of the uricase-PEG-5,000 when each is bound to the same number of PEG molecules. Such increased activity of uricase-PEG-20,000 allows for treatment using lower doses than previously considered possible. Lower doses of uricase-PEG-20,000 provide the advantages of minimizing immune responses to the uricase-PEG including reducing potential hypersensitivity problems, minimizing anaphalxsis, and lessening the occunence of rashes resulting in patients administered uricase-PEG. In mouse studies PEG-20,000 has also been shown to be safer than other PEG formulations, in particular PEG-5,000. Methods of treatment In some embodiments, the present invention provides methods of reducing uric acid levels in a patient comprising administering to said patient a therapeutically effective amount of a compound comprising uricase covalently bonded via a linking group to polyethylene glycol, wherein the polyethylene glycol has a total weight average molecular weight of from about 10,000 to about 30,000. In a preferred embodiment uricase is modified with polyethylene glycol having a total weight average molecular weight of about 20,000.
In some embodiments the present invention provides methods of treating uric acid related disorders in a patient comprising administering to said patient a therapeutically effective amount of a compound comprising uricase covalently bonded via a linking group to polyethylene glycol, wherein the polyethylene glycol has a total weight average molecular weight of from about 10,000 to about 30,000. In a prefened embodiment uricase is modified with polyethylene glycol having a total weight average molecular weight of about 20,000.
A therapeutically effective amount of one of the compounds of the present invention is an amount that is effective to reduce uric acid levels. Generally, treatment is initiated with small dosages which can be increased by small increments until the optimum effect under the circumstances is achieved. Generally, a therapeutic dosage of compounds of the present invention may be from about 1 to about 200 mg/kg twice a week to about once every two weeks. For example, the dosage may be about 1 mg/kg once a week as a 2 ml intravenous injection to about 20 mg/kg once every 3 days. Uricase-PEG20,000 maybe administered several times each day, once a day, once a week, or once every two weeks.
PEG-uricase may be mixed with a phosphate buffered saline solution, or any other appropriate solution known to those skilled in the art, prior to injection. The PEG-uricase formulation may be administered as a solid (lyophilate) or as a liquid formulation, as desired.
The methods of the present invention can involve either in vitro or in vivo applications. In the case of in vitro applications, including cell culture applications, the compounds described herein can be added to cells in cultures and then incubated. The compounds of the present invention may also be used to facilitate the production of monoclonal and/or polyclonal antibodies, using antibody production techniques well known in the art. The monoclonal and/or polyclonal antibodies can then be used in a wide variety of diagnostic applications, as would be apparent to one skilled in the art.
The in vivo means of administration of the compounds of the present invention will vary depending upon the intended application. As one skilled in the art will recognize, administration of the PEG-uricase composition of the present invention can be carried out, for example, orally, intranasally, intraperitoneally, parenterally, intravenously, intralymphatically, intratumorly, intramuscularly, interstitial ly, intra-arterially, subcutaneously, intraocularly, intrasynovial, transepithelial, and transdermally.
EXAMPLES The invention is further demonstrated in the following examples, which are for purposes of illustration, and are not intended to limit the scope of the present invention.
Example 1 : Isolation of the Candida utilis uricase coding sequence and construction of the expression plasmid.
Genomic DNA was isolated from C. utilis (ATCC 9950) and used as the template in PCR for the isolation of the uricase gene. C. utilis was grown lOOmL YPD medium in an incubator shaker at 30° C x 250 rpm. The next day, cells from 50mL of the culture were pelleted by centrifugation at 1500 x g for 10 minutes at room temperature. The pellet was resuspended in 15 ml of SCED buffer, pH 7.5 (1 M sorbitol, 10 mM sodium citrate, pH7.5, 10 mM EDTA, 10 mM DTT). Three mg of Lyticase™ (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, Cat. No. L- 4025) was added to the cells and the cells incubated at 37°C for 60 minutes. Fifteen ml of 1% SDS was added, mixed gently and set on ice for 5 minutes. Six ml of 5M potassium acetate, pH 8.9, was added and mixed gently. The solution was centrifuged at 10,000 x g for 10 minutes at 4°C. The supernatant was transfened to a clean centrifuge tube, 2 volumes of ethanol added and incubated at room temperature for 15 minutes. The DNA was pelleted by centrifugation at 10,000 x g for 20 minutes at 4°C. The pellet was resuspended in 10 ml of TE buffer, pH 7.4 (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 1 mM EDTA). The solution was gently extracted with an equal volume of phenolxhloroform (1:1 v/v) followed by an equal volume of chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (24: 1). One half volume of 7.5 M ammonium acetate, pH 7.5, and 2 volumes of ethanol was added and the tube placed at -70°C for 10 minutes. The DNA was pelleted centrifuge at 10,000 x g for 10 minutes at 4°C. The pellet was air dried the and resuspended in 1 ml of TE buffer, pH 7.5 containing 50 μg RNase A. The DNA was incubated at room temperature for 1 hour and then reprecipitated with an equal volume of ethanol. The DNA was pelleted by centrifugation at 10,000 x g for 10 minutes at 4°C. The pellet was resuspended in 1 ml TE buffer, pH 7.5. The concentration of the DNA was detenriined by measuring the optical density at 260 nm.
PCR was used to isolated the uricase gene from the C. utilis genomic DNA. The primers for the PCR have the following sequences: Forward primer, URIUforSna: 5'- GTG TAC GTA ATG TCA ACA ACG CTC TCA TCA -3' (SEQ. ID. NO.1)
Reverse primer, URIUrevH: 5'- AGA AAG CTT TTA CCA CTT GGT CTT CTC CTT A -3' (SEQ. ID. NO.2)
These primers place a SnaB I site at the 5' end of the coding sequence and a Hind III site at the 3' end for subcloning into pQE70 (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) for expression. The PCR mixture contained IX Vent polymerase buffer, 2.5 mM magnesium sulfate, 0.2 mM each dNTPs, 30 pmole of each primer, 1.8 μg of C. utilis genomic DNA and 2.5 U Vent polymerase (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA) in a 50 μl final reaction volume. PCR was carried out at 98°C for 2 minutes, followed by 30 cycles of 98°C for 30 seconds, 55°C for 30 seconds and 72°C for 60 seconds. One unit of Taq polymerase (Gibco, Rockville, MD) was then added and the reaction incubated at 72°C for 7 minutes. Twenty ml of the PCR was run on an 0.8% agarose gel. The PCR product was excised from the gel and extracted using the Qiagen gel extraction kit. The PCR product was subcloned into pCR2.1 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). The uricase PCR product was excised from pCR2.1 using SnaB I and Hind III and purified by agarose gel electrophoresis. pQE70 was digested with Sph I at 37° C for 1 hour, treated with Klenow fragment at room temperature for 15 minutes to create blunt ends, and then incubated at 80°C for 15 minutes to inactivate the Klenow enzyme. The treated plasmid was then digested with Hind III at 37°C for 1 hour, run on an agarose gel and then purified from the gel. The uricase fragment was then ligated into the digested pQE70 to create pQE-URIC. E. coli DG101 (ATCC 47041) was transformed with the ligation reaction and transformants were selected in the presence of ampicillin. Transformants were screened for uricase production by growing cells in 3 mL LB containing ampicillin (100 mg/mL) until the OD600 reached 0.5 to 0.6. Isopropyl -b- D-galactopyranoside (IPTG) was added to 1 mM final concentration and the cultures incubated for an additional 2 hours. Cell extracts were then analysed by SDS- polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and gels examined for the presence of a 34,000 Da protein. One transformant found to produce a 34,000 Da protein was tested and found to have uricase activity. pQE-URIC was isolated from this transformant and the gene for tetracycline resistance was inserted into the plasmid. For insertion of the gene conferring tetracycline resistance into pQE-URIC, pBR322 was digested with Eco RI and Ava I, and then treated with Klenow polymerase and dNTPs to create blunt ends on the digested DNA fragments. pQE-URIC was digested with Xbal and then treated with Klenow polymerase and dNTPs. The -1400 bp fragment from pBR322 containing the tetracycline resistance gene was gel purified and ligated into pQE-URIC to create pPHX12. The sequence of pPHX12 (SEQ ID NO:3), the uricase coding sequence (SEQ ID NO:4) found in pPHX12 and its translated amino acid sequence (SEQ ID 5) and the amino acid sequence of uricase as deduced from the coding sequence found in pPHX12 (SEQ ID NO: 6) are set forth in the attached Sequence Listing which is incorporated by reference. E. coli DG101 was transformed with pPHX12 to produce E. coli strain PHX12 which was used for the production and purification of uricase.
Example 2: Expression of uricase in E. coli.
For the production of uricase, PHX12 was grown in 20 L fennentations. E. coli non-defined medium #1 was used for the growth of PHX12 in a Bioflo IV Benchtop Fermentor (New Brunswick Scientific, Edison, NJ). Components of E. coli non-defined medium #1 consist of Basal Medium, 50 % glycerol, 100X salts solution, 100X calcium chloride solution, and 1000X vitamin solution. These components are prepared as described below. Basal Medium Per Liter of Medium casamino acids 30 g ammonium sulfate 3 g potassium phosphate, dibasic 2.5 g
Dissolve in 920 mL of water and autoclave or filter sterilized through a 0.22 μm filter.
Concentrated salts solution (100 X) boric acid 0.57 g copper (II) sulfate pentahydrate 0.39 g ferric chloride, lOOg in 40 mL water 2.0 ml manganese chloride tetrahydrate 4.0 g sodium chloride 5.0 g sodium molybdate dihydrate 0.5 g magnesium sulfate heptahydrate 25.0 g sulfuric acid 2.87 ml zinc sulfate heptahydrate 1.0 g
Dissolve in 1 liter of H2O and autoclaved or filter sterilized through a 0.22 μm filter. 50% (v/v) glycerol
Mix 1000 ml of glycerol and 1000 ml of H2O and autoclave or filter through a 0.22 μm filter.
Vitamin solution (1000 X) thiamine hydrochloride 0.26 g
Dissolve in 100 ml of H2O and filter sterilized through a 0.22 μm filter.
Calcium solution (100 X)
Calcium chloride dihydrate 10 g
Dissolve in 1 liter of H20 and autoclave or filter sterilized through a 0.22 μm filter.
For each liter of E. coli non-defined medium #1, the following were aseptically added to sterilized Basal Medium in the following amounts: 60 ml of glycerol solution 10 ml of concentrated salts solution 10 ml of calcium solution
1 ml of vitamin solution
Preparation of PHX12 Inoculum
A vial of PHX12 from a Working Cell Bank stored at -70°C was thawed and the contents aseptically transfened to 250 mL of E. coli Non-defined Medium #1 containing
12 μg/mL tetracycline in a 500 mL baffled shake flask. The tetracycline selection is maintained only at the shake flask level. The inoculated baffled shake flask was incubated in an environmental incubator at 37°C at 250 rpm. The shake flask culture was grown for
13 to 16 hours before being aseptically transfened to the BioFlo IV Fermentor containing 20 liters of sterile medium.
Cell Growth and Harvesting
E. coli Non-defined Medium #1 was used for the growth of PHX12 in the fermentor. E. coli Non-defined Basal Medium was prepared by dissolving 600 g casamino acids, 60 g ammonium sulfate, and 50 g potassium phosphate, dibasic, in 2 L of nanopure water. The fermentor was filled with 18.4 L of Basal Medium, 50 mL of Antifoam B was added to the Basal Medium and then sterilized using the sterilization cycle of the fermentor set at 121°C for 30 minutes. After sterilization, the medium was allowed to cool to 37°C or below and 200 mL of 100X calcium chloride solution, 200 mL of 100X concentrated salts solution, 20 mL of 1000X vitamin solution, and 1200 mL of 50% glycerol solution was aseptically added to the fermentor.
Parameters of the fermentation were as follows: Agitation was set to 700 rpm, the temperature was set to 37°C, and the air flow was set at 20 Lpm. The inoculum was then used to seed the fermentor. The culture was grown in the fermentor to an optical density (A600nm) of approximately 8. IPTG was then aseptically added to the fermentor to a final concentration of 1 mM. The fermentation was allowed to continue for 2 hours after the addition of IPTG. The cells were then harvested and then immediately concentrated to 2 to 3 L by diafiltration using a hollow fiber filter. The cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 8,000 x g for 10 minutes and the cell paste was transfened to plastic storage containers and stored at -70°C until further processed. A typical 20 liter fermentation produced 0.5 to 0.6 Kg of cell paste.
Example 3: Purification of Uricase
Cell paste from a 20 L fermentation was resuspended in 0.4 L of Lysis buffer (20 mM sodium phosphate, pH 8.5, 1 mM EDTA) using a Polytron™ homogenizer to achieve a homogenous suspension. The cells were lysed by passing two times through a microfluidizer at >15,000 psi. The lysed cell suspension was then centrifuged at 13,000 x g for 10 minutes. Ammonium sulfate was added to the supernatant to achieve 30% saturation. The suspension was stined at room temperature for 10 minutes and then centrifuged at 13,000 x g for 15 minutes. Ammonium sulfate was added to the supernatant to 64% saturation and the solution was stined at room temperature for 10 minutes and the solution was then centrifuged at 13,000 x g for 15 minutes. The pellet was resuspended in 0.4 L of Diafiltration buffer (20 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 8.5) and diafiltered against 5 volumes of Diafiltration Buffer using a filter with a 50,000 MW cutoff. The diafiltered solution was then applied to a Poros HQ50 column previously equilibrated with Column Buffer (20 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 8.5). The column was washed with Column Buffer and the flow through collected. The flow through material was then applied to a BioRad HA column equilibrated with Column Buffer. The HA column was washed with 10 volumes of Column Buffer and the uricase eluted by running a gradient from 100%) Column Buffer to 100% 0.5 M sodium phosphate, pH 8.5. The eluted uricase was again passed over a Poros HQ column equilibrated with Column Buffer. The flow through fraction containing the uricase was collected and stored at 4°C.
Example 4: Characterization of purified uricase Uricase assay Uricase activity was assayed using the uric acid diagnostic kit from Sigma (St.
Louis, MO). The specific activity of the enzyme was determined by incubating the enzyme with uric acid and monitoring the production of hydrogen peroxide. The production of hydrogen peroxide is determined by reaction with 4-aminoantipyrine and 3,5-dichloro-2- hydroxybenzenesulfonate in the presence of peroxidase. A quinoeimine dye is formed with an absorbance maximum at 520 nm. The intensity of the color produced is directly proportional to the amount of hydrogen peroxide formed. The amount of hydrogen peroxide formed is determined by comparison with standards containing known amounts of hydrogen peroxide. Specific Enzyme activity = nmol of hydrogen peroxide produced/min/mg of protein in the assay. Enzyme activity is expressed in IU/mL. 1 JJ is defined as that amount of enzyme which produces 1 nmol of hydrogen peroxide/min. SDS-PAGE
The expression level of the uricase was determined by SDS-PAGE. Samples (1 ml) from the 20 L fermentation culture were taken prior to the IPTG induction (pre-induction sample) of the uricase expression, and 2 hours following the addition of IPTG (post- induction sample). These samples were quickly centrifuged in a micro-centrifuge (12,000 x g for 1 min) then frozen at -70°C. The frozen cell pellet of was resuspended in 1 ml of water and sonicated for 15 sec with a probe sonicator. The resulting sonicate was electrophoresed on a 10-20% SDS-PAGE gel run under reducing conditions. The gels were stained using Coomassie Blue. Example 5: Pegylation
Pegylation of uricase with PEG-5,000
Purified uricase in Column Buffer (20 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 8.5) was pegylated with methoxy-SS-polyethyleneglycol MW 5,000 at a ratio of PEG to uricase of 30: 1 (wt/wt). The PEG 5000 was added to the uricase solution and stined for 1 hour at room temperature. The conjugated uricase-PEG 5000 was concentrated by diafiltration to approximately 1/10 volume and then diafiltered against 10 volumes of Formulation Buffer (20 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 6.8, 130 mM sodium chloride). Pegylation of uricase with PEG-20,000 Purified uricase in Column Buffer (20 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 8.5) was pegylated with methoxy-SS-polyethyleneglycol MW-20,000 at a ratio of PEG to uricase of 30:1 (wt/wt). The PEG 20000 was added to the uricase solution and stirred for 2 hours at room temperature. The conjugated uricase-PEG-20000 was concentrated by diafiltration to approximately 1/10 volume and then diafiltered against 10 volumes of Formulation Buffer (20 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 6.8, 130 mM sodium chloride).
Example 6: Characterization of pegylated protein SDS-PAGE
The purity of the pegylated uricase and extent of pegylation was examined by SDS- PAGE. Samples from the pegylation reactions were electrophoesed on a 10-20% SDS- PAGE gel run under reducing conditions. The gels were stained using Coomassie Blue. Uricase assay
The enzymatic activity of the pegylated uricases was determined using the uricase assay described in Example 4. Specific Enzyme activity = nmol of hydrogen peroxide produced/min.)/mg of protein in the assay. Enzyme activity is expressed in JJJ/mL. 1 IU is defined as that amount of enzyme which produces 1 nmol of hydrogen peroxide/min. PEG number
The trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid (TNBS) assay (Habeeb, A.F.S.A. Analyt. Biochem. 14, 328-336 (1966)) was used to determine the average number of polyethylene glycol molecules covalently attached to primary amines in each uricase protein (PEG number). TNBS reacts with the primary amine groups and results in a color change. Protein that has been pegylated is compared to protein that has not been pegylated.
Each protein sample was assayed at three different protein concentrations. Each concentration was assayed in duplicate. The protein concentration of each sample was adjusted to 0.2, 0.4 and 0.8 mg/mL with nanopure water and vortexed for 3 to 5 seconds. 0.25 mL of each protein sample was added into a 10 x 75 mm glass tube. 0.25 mL of 4% sodium bicarbonate was added to each tube followed by 0.25 mL of 0.1% TNBS. Tubes were incubated for 2 hours at 40° C. The tubes were then removed from the heating block and 0.25 mL of 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) added to each tube followed by 0.125 mL of IN HCl. The absorbance of each reaction was measured at 335 nm. The absorbances of the protein samples were plotted and linear regression was performed to determine the slope of the line. The number of primary amine residues pegylated was determined by the following formula:
Number of primary amines pegylated = 1 -(slope of pegylated protein/ slope of unpegylated protein) x total number of primary amine residues in the protein
Table 1. Comparison of native uricase and Uricase-PEG formulations.
Figure imgf000024_0001
A comparison of different uricase PEG formulations (Table 1) shows that the uricase-PEG-20,000 retains a higher specific activity than the uricase-PEG-5,000 even though the same average number of PEG molecules are attached to the protein. Uricase- PEG 20,000 retains 75% of the specific activity of the native enzyme, while uricase- PEG 5,000 retains only 56% of the native enzyme's activity. This means that less of the uricase-PEG 20,000 can be used to produce a given enzymatic activity than would be required if uricase-PEG 5,000 were being used. However, the enzymatic activity of uricase-PEG failed to increase relative to PEG-20,000 when PEGs larger than 20,000 were covalently bonded to uricase.
Further, the average molecular weight of the PEG covalently bonded to uricase also plays an important role in determining both circulating half-life and production yield. The yield of uricase-PEG increases with increasing average molecular weight of the bound polyethylene glycol as the average molecular weight of the PEGs increases up to PEG-20,000. However, when PEG's with an average molecular weight over 20,000 were used, the yield of uricase-PEG decreased significantly. For example, when uricase is bound to PEG-20,000, the relative yield is 1.0. When uricase is bound to PEG-5,000, the relative yield is about 0.5. When uricase is bound to PEG- 10,000, the relative yield is about 0.66. When uricase is bound to PEG-40,000, the relative yield drops to about 0.1.
Example 9: Application to Humans The circulating half life of PEG conjugated uricase has a circulating half life that is 5 to 10 times longer than the same fonnulations in mice. What this has meant in the past is that the human dose is most often 1/5 to 1/10 of that used in mice. Accordingly, the circulating half-life of PEG-uricase should circulate even longer in humans than it does in mice.
Each of the patents, patent applications and publications described herein are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
Various modifications of the invention, in addition to those described herein, will be apparent to one skilled in the art in view of the foregoing description. Such modifications are also intended to fall within the scope of the appended claims.

Claims

What is claimed is:
1. A compound comprising uricase covalently bonded via a linking group to polyethylene glycol, wherein the polyethylene glycol has a total weight average molecular weight of about 10,000 to about 30,000, and wherein the linking group is selected from the group consisting of a succinimide group, an amide group, an imide group, a carbamate group, an ester group, an epoxy group, a carboxyl group, a hydroxyl group, a carbohydrate, a tyrosine group, a cysteine group, a histidine group and combinations thereof.
2. The compound of claim 1, wherein said linking group is a succinimide group.
3. The compound of claim 2, wherein said succinimide group is succinimidyl succinate, succinimidyl propionate, succinimidyl carboxymethylate, succinimidyl succinamide, N-hydroxy succinimide or combinations thereof.
4. The compound of claim 3, wherein said succinimide group is succinimidyl succinate, succinimidyl propionate or combinations thereof.
5. The compound of claim 1, wherein said uricase is derived from a microorganism selected from the group consisting of Asperigillus flavus, Candida utilis, Arthrobacter protoformiae, and combinations thereof.
6. The compound of claim 5, wherein said microorganism is Asperigillus flavus.
7. The compound of claim 5, wherein said microorganism is Candida utilis
8. The compound of claim 5, wherein said microorganism is Arthrobacter protoformiae.
9. The compound of claim 1 wherein the polyethylene glycol has an average molecular weight of about 20,000.
10. The compound of claim 1 wherein said uricase is covalently bonded to about 10 to about 25 polyethylene glycol molecules.
11. The compound of claim 1, wherein said uricase is covalently bonded to about 18 to about 22 polyethylene glycol molecules.
12. The compound of claim 1, wherein said uricase is covalently bonded to about 20 polyethylene glycol molecules.
13. The compound of claim 1 wherein polyethylene glycol is covalently attached to uricase at residues other than Lys156 of SEQ ID NO:6.
14. The compound of claim 1 wherein polyethylene glycol is covalently attached to uricase at residues other than Lys167 of SEQ ID NO:6.
15. The compound of claim 1 wherein polyethylene glycol is covalently attached to uricase at residues other than Lys12 of SEQ ID NO:6.
16. The compound of claim 1 wherein polyethylene glycol is covalently attached to uricase at residues other than Lys64 of SEQ ID NO:6.
17. The compound of claim 1 wherein polyethylene glycol is covalently attached to uricase at residues other than Lys262 of SEQ ID NO:6.
18. The compound of claim 1 wherein polyethylene glycol is covalently attached to uricase at residues other than Lys117 of SEQ ID NO:6.
19. The compound of claim 1 wherein polyethylene glycol is covalently attached to uricase at residues other than Lys16, Lys28, and Lys72 of SEQ ID NO:6.
20. The compound of claim 1 wherein polyethylene glycol is covalently attached to uricase at residues other than Lys12, Lys16, Lys28, Lys64, Lys72, Lys117, Lys156, Lys167, and Lys262 of SEQ ID NO:6.
21. The compound of any one of claims 1 or 13-20 wherein polyethylene glycol is covalently attached to uricase at one or more lysine residues.
22. A method of enhancing the circulating half life of uricase comprising modifying said uricase by covalently bonding said uricase via a linking group to polyethylene glycol, wherein the polyethylene glycol has a total weight average molecular weight of about 10,000 to about 30,000, and wherein the linking group is selected from the group consisting of a succinimide group, an amide group, an imide group, a carbamate group, an ester group, an epoxy group, a carboxyl group, a hydroxyl group, a carbohydrate, a tyrosine group, a cysteine group, a histidine group and combinations thereof.
23. The method of claim 22 wherein the polyethylene glycol has an average molecular weight of about 20,000.
24. The method of claim 22, wherein said uricase is covalently bonded to about 10 to about 25 polyethylene glycol molecules.
25. The method of claim 22, wherein said uricase is covalently bonded to about 18 to about 22 polyethylene glycol molecules.
26. A method of enhancing the anti-uric acid activity of uricase comprising modifying said uricase by covalently bonding said uricase via a linking group to polyethylene glycol, wherein the polyethylene glycol has a total weight average molecular weight of from about 10,000 to about 30,000, and wherein the linking group is selected from the group consisting of a succinimide group, an amide group, an imide group, a carbamate group, an ester group, an epoxy group, a carboxyl group, a hydroxyl group, a carbohydrate, a tyrosine group, a cysteine group, a histidine group and combinations thereof.
27. The method of claim 26 wherein the polyethylene glycol has an average molecular weight of about 20,000.
28. The method of claim 26, wherein said uricase is covalently bonded to about 10 to about 25 polyethylene glycol molecules.
29. The method of claim 26, wherein said uricase is covalently bonded to about 18 to about 22 polyethylene glycol molecules.
30. The method of claim 26 wherein said uricase is covalently bonded to about 20 polyethylene glycol molecules.
31. A method of reducing uric acid levels in a patient comprising admimstering to said patient a therapeutically effective amount of the compound of claim 1.
32. The method of claim 31 , wherein said patient has hypouricemia.
33. The method of claim 31, wherein said polyethylene glycol has an average molecular weight of about 20,000
34. The method of claim 31, wherein said linking group is a succinimide group.
35. The method of claim 32, wherein said succinimide group is succinimidyl succinate, succinimidyl propionate, succinimidyl carboxymethylate, succinimidyl succinamide, N-hydroxy succinimide or combinations thereof.
36. A method of treating uric acid related disorders in a patient comprising administering to said patient a therapeutically effective amount of the compound of claim 1.
37. The method of claim 36, wherein said polyethylene glycol has an average molecular weight of about 20,000
38. The method of claim 36 wherein polyethylene glycol molecule is covalently attached to uricase at residues other than Lys12, Lys16, Lys28, Lys64, Lys72, Lys117, Lys156, Lys167, and Lys262 of SEQ ID NO:6.
39. A compound comprising uricase coupled to polyethylene glycol, wherein the polyethylene glycol has a total weight average molecular weight of about 10,000 to about 30,000.
40. The compound of claim 39 wherein the polyethylene glycol has an average molecular weight of about 20,000.
41. The compound of claim 39, wherein said uricase is covalently bonded to about 10 to about 25 polyethylene glycol molecules.
42. The compound of claim 39, wherein said uricase is covalently bonded to about 18 to about 22 polyethylene glycol molecules.
43. The compound of claim 39, wherein said uricase is coupled to about 20 polyethylene glycol molecules.
44. The compound of claim 39 wherein polyethylene glycol is coupled to uricase at residues other than Lys12, Lys16, Lys28, Lys64, Lys72, Lys117, Lys156, Lys167, and Lys262 of SEQ ID NO:6.
45. A method of enhancing the anti-uric acid activity of uricase comprising modifying said uricase by covalently bonding said uricase to polyethylene glycol, wherein the polyethylene glycol has a total weight average molecular weight of from about 10,000 to about 30,000.
46. The method of claim 45, wherein said uricase is covalently bonded to about 20 polyethylene glycol molecules.
47. The method of claim 45 wherein the polyethylene glycol has an average molecular weight of about 20,000.
PCT/US2002/013265 2001-08-02 2002-04-26 Peg-modified uricase WO2003011211A2 (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP02791530A EP1420748A4 (en) 2001-08-02 2002-04-26 Peg-modified uricase
JP2003516443A JP2005528881A (en) 2001-08-02 2002-04-26 PEG-modified uricase
AU2002308487A AU2002308487A1 (en) 2001-08-02 2002-04-26 Peg-modified uricase

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/921,380 2001-08-02
US09/921,380 US6913915B2 (en) 2001-08-02 2001-08-02 PEG-modified uricase

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2003011211A2 true WO2003011211A2 (en) 2003-02-13
WO2003011211A3 WO2003011211A3 (en) 2003-10-16

Family

ID=25445342

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2002/013265 WO2003011211A2 (en) 2001-08-02 2002-04-26 Peg-modified uricase

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (2) US6913915B2 (en)
EP (1) EP1420748A4 (en)
JP (1) JP2005528881A (en)
CN (1) CN1288243C (en)
AU (1) AU2002308487A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2003011211A2 (en)

Cited By (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2007052326A3 (en) * 2005-11-07 2007-11-29 Univ Parma Method for conversion of uric acid to allantoin and related enzymes
CN102260653A (en) * 2011-06-30 2011-11-30 北京盛宏生物技术有限公司 Preparation and application method of PEG recombinant pig-human urate oxidase fusion protein
US8129330B2 (en) 2002-09-30 2012-03-06 Mountain View Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Polymer conjugates with decreased antigenicity, methods of preparation and uses thereof
US9017980B2 (en) 2005-04-11 2015-04-28 Crealta Pharmaceuticals Llc Variant forms of urate oxidase and use thereof
CN106554948A (en) * 2015-09-29 2017-04-05 上海生物制品研究所有限责任公司 Saltant type uricase, the saltant type uricase of PEG modifications and its application
US9885024B2 (en) 1998-08-06 2018-02-06 Duke University PEG-urate oxidase conjugates and use thereof
US10139399B2 (en) 2009-06-25 2018-11-27 Horizon Pharma Rheumatology Llc Methods and kits for predicting infusion reaction risk and antibody-mediated loss of response by monitoring serum uric acid during PEGylated uricase therapy
WO2020228618A1 (en) * 2019-05-10 2020-11-19 重庆派金生物科技有限公司 Polyethylene glycol-modified urate oxidase
USRE49736E1 (en) * 2009-07-06 2023-11-28 Jazz Pharmaceuticals Ii Sas Pegylated L-asparaginase

Families Citing this family (40)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6783965B1 (en) 2000-02-10 2004-08-31 Mountain View Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Aggregate-free urate oxidase for preparation of non-immunogenic polymer conjugates
US20040062748A1 (en) * 2002-09-30 2004-04-01 Mountain View Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Polymer conjugates with decreased antigenicity, methods of preparation and uses thereof
WO2006010005A1 (en) * 2004-06-21 2006-01-26 University Of Florida Research Foundation, Inc. Lowering uric acid to prevent or accelerate recovery of acute renal failure
US20080159976A1 (en) * 2005-04-11 2008-07-03 Jacob Hartman Methods for lowering elevated uric acid levels using intravenous injections of PEG-uricase
US8148123B2 (en) 2005-04-11 2012-04-03 Savient Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Methods for lowering elevated uric acid levels using intravenous injections of PEG-uricase
CN101194016B (en) * 2005-04-11 2012-09-05 萨文特医药公司 A variant form of urate oxidase and use thereof
WO2006125452A1 (en) * 2005-05-23 2006-11-30 Universite De Geneve Injectable superparamagnetic nanoparticles for treatment by hyperthermia and use for forming an hyperthermic implant
KR20080108147A (en) 2006-03-31 2008-12-11 백스터 인터내셔널 인코포레이티드 Pegylated factor viii
US7645860B2 (en) * 2006-03-31 2010-01-12 Baxter Healthcare S.A. Factor VIII polymer conjugates
US7985839B2 (en) * 2006-03-31 2011-07-26 Baxter International Inc. Factor VIII polymer conjugates
US7982010B2 (en) * 2006-03-31 2011-07-19 Baxter International Inc. Factor VIII polymer conjugates
PL2013225T3 (en) * 2006-04-12 2015-06-30 Crealta Pharmaceuticals Llc Purification of proteins with cationic surfactant
PT2101821E (en) 2006-12-15 2014-10-03 Baxter Int Factor viia- (poly) sialic acid conjugate having prolonged in vivo half-life
CN101302501B (en) * 2007-05-10 2012-07-04 刘国安 PEGylated uricoxidase compound, preparing method, preparation and use thereof
CN101875922B (en) * 2009-04-30 2012-02-22 重庆医科大学 Intracellular uricases from recombinant baccilus fastidious as well as polyethylene glycol modification and application thereof
US8642737B2 (en) 2010-07-26 2014-02-04 Baxter International Inc. Nucleophilic catalysts for oxime linkage
PL2459224T3 (en) 2009-07-27 2017-08-31 Baxalta GmbH Blood coagulation protein conjugates
CN102573920B (en) 2009-07-27 2015-01-14 利普森技术有限公司 Glycopolysialylation of non-blood coagulation proteins
JP5908401B2 (en) * 2009-07-27 2016-04-26 バクスター・インターナショナル・インコーポレイテッドBaxter International Incorp0Rated Blood coagulation protein complex
US8809501B2 (en) 2009-07-27 2014-08-19 Baxter International Inc. Nucleophilic catalysts for oxime linkage
CN103269723B (en) 2010-12-22 2017-04-05 百深有限责任公司 For couple water soluble derivative of fatty acid and the material and method of protein
CN102634492B (en) 2011-02-14 2015-06-10 重庆富进生物医药有限公司 Polyethylene glycol dog source urate oxidase analogue, and preparation method and applications thereof
US20120301498A1 (en) 2011-04-29 2012-11-29 Selecta Biosciences, Inc. Controlled release of immunosuppressants from synthetic nanocarriers
CN102229924A (en) * 2011-05-18 2011-11-02 华林 Polyethylene glycol-modified Serratia protein-digesting enzyme as well as preparation method and application thereof
CN103083678B (en) * 2011-10-31 2018-07-06 重庆医科大学 The method that the activated polyethylene glycol modification uricase for amino is used under competitive inhibitor protection
BR122020023215B1 (en) 2013-05-03 2022-11-22 Selecta Biosciences, Inc COMPOSITION AND KIT OF TOLEROGENIC SYNTHETIC NANOCARRIERS TO REDUCE OR PREVENT ANAPHYLAXIS IN RESPONSE TO A NON-ALLERGEN ANTIGEN
IL292574A (en) 2014-09-07 2022-06-01 Selecta Biosciences Inc Methods and compositions for attenuating anti-viral transfer vector immune responses
EP3204454A1 (en) * 2014-10-10 2017-08-16 Dow Global Technologies Llc Surfactant composition
RU2752497C2 (en) * 2015-05-15 2021-07-28 МЕДИММЬЮН, ЭлЭлСи Improved uricase sequences and treatment methods
CN105412942B (en) * 2015-12-23 2019-02-26 沈阳三生制药有限责任公司 The recombination candida utili urate oxidase freeze dried injection of Pegylation
CN109152819A (en) 2016-03-11 2019-01-04 西莱克塔生物科技公司 The preparation and dosage of Pegylation uricase
JP2020510687A (en) 2017-03-11 2020-04-09 セレクタ バイオサイエンシーズ インコーポレーテッドSelecta Biosciences,Inc. Methods and compositions relating to combination treatment with synthetic nanocarriers including anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive agents
EP3655527A4 (en) * 2017-07-07 2021-06-16 Allena Pharmaceuticals Inc. Recombinant uricase enzyme
WO2019183292A1 (en) 2018-03-20 2019-09-26 Rubius Therapeutics, Inc. Therapeutic cell systems and methods for treating hyperuricemia and gout
CA3138071A1 (en) 2019-06-04 2020-12-10 Selecta Biosciences, Inc. Formulations and doses of pegylated uricase
EP4054531A1 (en) 2019-11-08 2022-09-14 Selecta Biosciences, Inc. Formulations and doses of pegylated uricase
CN113995718A (en) * 2020-07-28 2022-02-01 鲁南制药集团股份有限公司 Pegylated recombinant canine human uricase injection preparation
JP2023548496A (en) 2020-11-03 2023-11-17 プロタリクス リミテッド Modified uricase and its use
CN113995771B (en) * 2021-12-06 2023-05-23 昆明品品生物科技有限公司 Application of polyethylene glycol in preparation of medicine with blood uric acid reducing effect
CN117427180A (en) * 2022-07-22 2024-01-23 派格生物医药(苏州)股份有限公司 Preparation method of polyethylene glycol conjugate of active polypeptide or protein

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4179337A (en) * 1973-07-20 1979-12-18 Davis Frank F Non-immunogenic polypeptides
US4460683A (en) * 1981-07-07 1984-07-17 Boehringer Mannheim Gmbh Soluble liver uricase with a process for the preparation thereof and with the use thereof

Family Cites Families (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4062731A (en) 1976-07-21 1977-12-13 Eastman Kodak Company Production of uricase from micrococcus luteus
US4064010A (en) 1976-07-21 1977-12-20 Eastman Kodak Company Purification of uricase
JPS6031472B2 (en) 1978-12-14 1985-07-22 協和醗酵工業株式会社 acid uricase
IT1141061B (en) 1980-09-19 1986-10-01 Anic Spa PROCEDURE FOR THE PRODUCTION OF URICASI
US4394450A (en) 1982-03-01 1983-07-19 Miles Laboratories, Inc. Method for purification of uricase
JPH0671425B2 (en) 1985-06-05 1994-09-14 サッポロビール株式会社 Uricase and method for producing the same
US5728562A (en) 1988-08-17 1998-03-17 Toyo Boseki Kabushiki Kaisha Isolated recombinant uricase
JP2971218B2 (en) 1991-12-04 1999-11-02 協和醗酵工業株式会社 Uricase gene and method for producing uricase
US5728652A (en) * 1995-02-10 1998-03-17 Texas United Chemical Company, Llc. Brine fluids having improved rheological charactersitics
JP3462313B2 (en) 1995-08-24 2003-11-05 キッコーマン株式会社 Mutant uricase, mutant uricase gene, novel recombinant DNA, and method for producing mutant uricase
DK2316475T3 (en) 1998-08-06 2017-11-20 Mountain View Pharmaceuticals Inc Isolated tetrameric uricase
US6783965B1 (en) 2000-02-10 2004-08-31 Mountain View Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Aggregate-free urate oxidase for preparation of non-immunogenic polymer conjugates
PL220873B1 (en) * 1998-08-06 2016-01-29 Mountain View Pharmaceuticals Uricase conjugate, pharmaceutical composition comprising thereof and the use thereof

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4179337A (en) * 1973-07-20 1979-12-18 Davis Frank F Non-immunogenic polypeptides
US4460683A (en) * 1981-07-07 1984-07-17 Boehringer Mannheim Gmbh Soluble liver uricase with a process for the preparation thereof and with the use thereof

Non-Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
CALICETI P. ET AL.: 'Immunological properties of uricase conjugated to neutral soluble polymers' BIOCONJUGATE CHEM. vol. 12, no. 4, 18 July 2001, pages 515 - 522, XP002972802 *
CHUA C.C. ET AL.: 'Use of polyethylene glycol-modified uricase (PEG-uricase) to treat hyperuricemia in a patient with Non-Hodgkin lymphoma' ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE vol. 109, 15 July 1988, pages 114 - 117, XP002125211 *
HARRIS: 'Poly(ethylene glycol) chemistry', 1992, PLENUM PRESS, NEW YORK AND LONDON article ZALIPSKY S. ET AL.: 'Use of Functionalized Poly(Ethylene Glycol)s for Modification of Polypeptides', pages 347 - 370, XP002972803 *
See also references of EP1420748A2 *

Cited By (21)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9885024B2 (en) 1998-08-06 2018-02-06 Duke University PEG-urate oxidase conjugates and use thereof
US8129330B2 (en) 2002-09-30 2012-03-06 Mountain View Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Polymer conjugates with decreased antigenicity, methods of preparation and uses thereof
US9926537B2 (en) 2005-04-11 2018-03-27 Horizon Pharma Rheumatology Llc Variant forms of urate oxidase and use thereof
US9926538B2 (en) 2005-04-11 2018-03-27 Horizon Pharma Rheumatology Llc Variant forms of urate oxidase and use thereof
US9017980B2 (en) 2005-04-11 2015-04-28 Crealta Pharmaceuticals Llc Variant forms of urate oxidase and use thereof
US11345899B2 (en) 2005-04-11 2022-05-31 Horizon Therapeutics Usa, Inc. Variant forms of urate oxidase and use thereof
US9670467B2 (en) 2005-04-11 2017-06-06 Horizon Pharma Rheumatology Llc Variant forms of urate oxidase and use thereof
US11781119B2 (en) 2005-04-11 2023-10-10 Horizon Therapeutics Usa, Inc. Variant forms of urate oxidase and use thereof
US10731139B2 (en) 2005-04-11 2020-08-04 Horizon Pharma Rheumatology Llc Variant forms of urate oxidase and use thereof
US10160958B2 (en) 2005-04-11 2018-12-25 Horizon Pharma Rheumatology Llc Variant forms of urate oxidase and use thereof
WO2007052326A3 (en) * 2005-11-07 2007-11-29 Univ Parma Method for conversion of uric acid to allantoin and related enzymes
US10139399B2 (en) 2009-06-25 2018-11-27 Horizon Pharma Rheumatology Llc Methods and kits for predicting infusion reaction risk and antibody-mediated loss of response by monitoring serum uric acid during PEGylated uricase therapy
US11639927B2 (en) 2009-06-25 2023-05-02 Horizon Therapeutics Usa, Inc. Methods and kits for predicting infusion reaction risk and antibody-mediated loss of response by monitoring serum uric acid during PEGylated uricase therapy
US10823727B2 (en) 2009-06-25 2020-11-03 Horizon Pharma Rheumatology Llc Methods and kits for predicting infusion reaction risk and antibody-mediated loss of response by monitoring serum uric acid during pegylated uricase therapy
US11598767B2 (en) 2009-06-25 2023-03-07 Horizon Therapeutics Usa, Inc. Methods and kits for predicting infusion reaction risk and antibody-mediated loss of response by monitoring serum uric acid during pegylated uricase therapy
USRE49736E1 (en) * 2009-07-06 2023-11-28 Jazz Pharmaceuticals Ii Sas Pegylated L-asparaginase
CN102260653B (en) * 2011-06-30 2013-04-03 荣俊 Preparation and application method of PEG recombinant pig-human urate oxidase fusion protein
CN102260653A (en) * 2011-06-30 2011-11-30 北京盛宏生物技术有限公司 Preparation and application method of PEG recombinant pig-human urate oxidase fusion protein
CN106554948A (en) * 2015-09-29 2017-04-05 上海生物制品研究所有限责任公司 Saltant type uricase, the saltant type uricase of PEG modifications and its application
CN106554948B (en) * 2015-09-29 2019-06-25 上海生物制品研究所有限责任公司 Saltant type uricase, the saltant type uricase of PEG modification and its application
WO2020228618A1 (en) * 2019-05-10 2020-11-19 重庆派金生物科技有限公司 Polyethylene glycol-modified urate oxidase

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP1420748A2 (en) 2004-05-26
CN1288243C (en) 2006-12-06
AU2002308487A1 (en) 2003-02-17
EP1420748A4 (en) 2006-04-26
CN1561390A (en) 2005-01-05
US20050226859A1 (en) 2005-10-13
US20030082786A1 (en) 2003-05-01
WO2003011211A3 (en) 2003-10-16
JP2005528881A (en) 2005-09-29
US6913915B2 (en) 2005-07-05

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6913915B2 (en) PEG-modified uricase
EP1100880B1 (en) Urate oxidase
US9885024B2 (en) PEG-urate oxidase conjugates and use thereof
EP0981607B1 (en) Modified arginine deiminase
Bomalaski et al. Uricase formulated with polyethylene glycol (uricase-PEG 20): biochemical rationale and preclinical studies.
RU2349341C2 (en) Peg-urate oxidase conjugates, their application, method of tetrameric uricase form separation
US6635462B1 (en) Mutated form of arginine deiminase
WO2002044360A2 (en) Modified arginine deiminase
US20060188971A1 (en) Urate oxidase
CN112852772A (en) Urate oxidase based on intramolecular cross-linking and polyethylene glycol modification and preparation method thereof
MXPA01001342A (en) Urate oxidase

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NO NZ OM PH PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TN TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VN YU ZA ZM ZW

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DM DZ EC EE ES FI GB GD GE GH HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MN MW MX MZ NO NZ OM PH PL PT RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TN TR TZ UA UG US UZ VN YU ZA ZM

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ ML MR NE SN TD TG US

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2003516443

Country of ref document: JP

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2002791530

Country of ref document: EP

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 20028193873

Country of ref document: CN

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 2002791530

Country of ref document: EP

REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: 8642