WO2003079153A2 - Inventory management system for reducing overall warehouse and pipeline inventory - Google Patents
Inventory management system for reducing overall warehouse and pipeline inventory Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2003079153A2 WO2003079153A2 PCT/US2003/007634 US0307634W WO03079153A2 WO 2003079153 A2 WO2003079153 A2 WO 2003079153A2 US 0307634 W US0307634 W US 0307634W WO 03079153 A2 WO03079153 A2 WO 03079153A2
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- computer system
- parts
- central warehouse
- ltc
- transportation
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/08—Logistics, e.g. warehousing, loading or distribution; Inventory or stock management
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/08—Logistics, e.g. warehousing, loading or distribution; Inventory or stock management
- G06Q10/087—Inventory or stock management, e.g. order filling, procurement or balancing against orders
Definitions
- This invention relates to systems and methods for coordinating the delivery of items (such as component parts) from a supplier to a manufacturer.
- This system and method is discussed below in relation to delivering component parts from a supplier of electronics components (or “parts") to an electronics manufacturer.
- the concepts described below may be applied to coordinating the delivery of other items, such as mechanical parts or finished consumer items.
- OEM's are manufacturers and distributors of products. OEM's have traditionally manufactured at least some of their products in-house, but there is a trend to outsource more manufacturing work to contract manufacturers. Dell and Compaq are examples of OEM's.
- Suppliers typically manufacture component parts that are needed to produce a larger product.
- An example of a well-known component supplier is Intel, a company that produces microprocessors and other components that are used within larger electronic devices, such as personal computers and servers.
- Third party logistics providers are third party companies (such as UPS
- a supply chain would be coordinated so that a dependable stream of parts would be shipped from a supplier to a manufacturer (for example, a contract manufacturer or OEM) so that parts would always arrive at the precise moment that the parts are needed at the assembly line.
- This ideal supply chain would also be structured so that the manufacturer would always have sufficient parts to manufacture products at the manufacturer's desired rate without interruption.
- the amount of safety stock that a manufacturer needs to have available near a manufacturing facility (e.g., a manufacturing plant) in order to assure uninterrupted operation of their manufacturing facilities is directly related to the predictability of the supply of products to the manufacturing facility (or a warehouse close to the manufacturing facility). For example, if a manufacturer can rely on needed parts to arrive within a 2 day delivery window, the manufacturer may only need to keep a two to three day safety stock of parts on hand. However, if the manufacturer can only rely on needed parts to arrive within a 7 day delivery window, the manufacturer would need to keep a significantly larger safety stock on hand to assure uninterrupted operation of the manufacturing facilities. h recent years, demand for electronic components has been relatively low.
- Vendor Managed Inventory (NMI) agreements also known as Supplier Managed Inventory (SMI) agreements
- SMI Supplier Managed Inventory
- VMI systems One particular disadvantage of current VMI systems is lack of visibility. It is currently common for a given supplier to supply parts to proximity hubs that are run by many different 3PL companies. These 3PL companies can range in sophistication from large, sophisticated 3PL providers to small, local, unsophisticated 3PL providers. As a result, suppliers have difficulty obtaining information on the status and allocation of their parts while the parts are stored at the proximity hubs, and manufacturers have difficulty obtaining information regarding their current allocation of parts and the shipping status of these parts. As will be understood by one skilled in the relevant filed, this, along with unpredictable variations in demand, has contributed to the undesirable "bullwhip effect", which causes manufacturers to request that excessive numbers of parts be maintained at their proximity hubs. This lack of visibility has also made it difficult for suppliers to quickly and effectively re-allocate parts from one manufacturer to another in response to changing market conditions.
- the supplier's inventory is fragmented into multiple proximity hubs that are typically run by multiple (small) 3PL organizations. This increases the risk that certain parts may go unused.
- the present invention provides an inventory management system for reducing overall warehouse and pipeline inventory.
- the invention comprises a computer system for use in a distribution network, the distribution network comprising a central warehouse that is adjacent a transportation hub, and the central warehouse being configured to store sufficient component parts to provide a regular stream of parts to each of a plurality of manufacturing facilities.
- This computer system is preferably configured for coordinating the transportation of a regular stream of parts to each of the manufacturing facilities by transporting component parts from the central warehouse to each of the manufacturing facilities primarily via an expedited delivery service performed using the transportation hub.
- the expedited delivery service may include, for example, guaranteed delivery within one or two days.
- the regular stream of parts is sufficient to supply at least one of the manufacturing facilities with at least about sixty percent, or at least about eighty percent, of the manufacturing facility's needed supply of a particular kind of component part.
- the computer system is configured to coordinate the supply of a regular stream of parts to each manufacturing facility within a nationwide network of manufacturing facilities.
- the system is preferably also configured for: (1) coordinating the transportation of a particular part from the central warehouse to a particular one of the manufacturing facilities; and (2) after the particular part has been assembled into a finished product at the particular manufacturing facility, coordinating the transportation of the finished product back to the central warehouse via the transportation hub.
- the system may also be configured for coordinating the performance of a value added service on the finished product at the central warehouse.
- This value added service may include, for example, labeling the product or assembling the finished product into a kit.
- the system is configured to coordinate the delivery of the finished product to a customer after the finished product has been transported to the central warehouse via the transportation hub.
- the component parts include one or more electronic components (such as computer chips), and the system is configured for coordinating the loading of software onto the electronic components at the central warehouse, hi addition, the system is preferably configured for assigning at least a particular one of the electronic components a part number in response to the software being loaded onto the particular one of the electronic components. This part number preferably indicates the functionality of the programmed computer chip. h another embodiment of the invention, the system is configured for tracking items, such as component parts, within a central warehouse.
- electronic components such as computer chips
- a system is configured for tracking parts at a central warehouse. More particularly, this system is configured for: (1) assigning a first part number to a part within the central warehouse; (2) updating a database to associate the first part number with the part; (3) receiving an indication that the part has been modified; (4) in response to receiving the indication, assigning a second part number to the part; and (5) updating a database to associate the second part number with the part.
- the step of receiving an indication that the part has been modified comprises receiving an indication that the part has been loaded with a particular type of software.
- the second part number preferably corresponds to a part that has been loaded with the particular type of software loaded onto the part.
- the system is preferably configured for maintaining a history of one or more part numbers that were formally associated with the part.
- the system is configured for maintaining a history of substantially all of the part numbers that have been associated with the part since the part initially entered the central warehouse.
- the invention further comprises a computer system for tracking parts at a central warehouse. This system is preferably configured for: (1) assigning a first identification indicia to a part within the central warehouse; (2) updating a database to associate the first identification indicia with the part; (3) receiving an indication that a status associated with the part has changed; (4) in response to receiving the indication, assigning a second identification indicia to the part; and (5) updating a database to associate the second identification indicia with the part.
- a method includes the steps of: (1) storing a plurality of parts in a central warehouse; and (2) allowing a user to reallocate (preferably simultaneously) the plurality of parts from a first entity to a second entity without requiring the plurahty of parts to be physically moved from the central warehouse.
- This method preferably further comprises the step of allowing a user to reallocate the plurality of parts from a second entity to a third entity without requiring the plurality of parts to be physically moved from the central warehouse.
- a method includes the additional steps of: (1) storing the plurality of parts in the central warehouse for a first period of time during which the plurality of parts are allocated to a first entity; (2) after the step of storing the plurality of parts in the central warehouse for the first period of time, receiving a request to reallocate the plurality of parts from the first entity to the second entity; (3) in response to receiving the request, reallocating the plurality of parts from the first entity to the second entity; and (4) after reallocating the plurality of parts to the second entity, continuing to store the plurality of parts in the warehouse.
- the method includes the additional steps of: (1) after reallocating the plurality of parts to the second entity, receiving a second request to reallocate the plurality of parts from the second entity to a third entity; (2) in response to receiving the second request, reallocating the plurality of parts from the second entity to the third entity; and after reallocating the plurality of parts to the third entity, continuing to store the plurality of parts in the warehouse.
- the method further comprises the step of providing a computer system that is configured to allow a user to use a "drag-and-drop" technique on a display screen to perform the step of reallocating (preferably simultaneously) the plurality of parts from the first entity to the second entity.
- the system is preferably configured to reallocate the plurality of parts from a first entity to a second entity without changing a physical position of the plurality of parts within the central warehouse.
- Figure 1 is a graphical depiction of a typical inbound distribution flow of electronic parts under a prior art VMI system.
- Figure 2 is a schematic depiction of a prior art electronics manufacturing supply chain.
- FIG. 4 graphically depicts how value added services preferably occur at the LTC, and how these value added services affect a part's part number according to one embodiment of the invention.
- Figure 5 is a graphical depiction of the distribution flow of a "Regional Replenishment Model" logistics system according to one embodiment of the invention.
- the present invention may be embodied as a method, a data processing system, or a computer program product. Accordingly, the present invention may take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment or an embodiment combining software and hardware aspects.
- the present invention may be embodied in a computer system that is configured to coordinate, preferably in an automated manner, the methods described below.
- the present invention may take the form of a computer program product on a computer-readable storage medium having computer- readable program code embodied in the storage medium. More particularly, the present invention may take the form of web-implemented computer software. Any suitable computer-readable storage medium may be utilized including hard disks, CD-ROMs, optical storage devices, or magnetic storage devices.
- Figure 1 shows a typical inbound distribution of electronic parts under a prior art VMI system.
- electronic components are typically shipped directly from suppliers in Asia to a location on the West Coast, such as San Francisco. The parts are then routed, for example, via standard delivery from this location to the various proximity hubs.
- Figure 2 under this system, it takes from 7 to 15 days to execute the logistics processes needed to transport parts from the suppliers (i.e., the component manufacturers) to the contract manufacturers.
- the variability in time that it takes to deliver components from the suppliers to the manufacturers makes it necessary for manufacturers to maintain additional safety stock of components near their manufacturing facilities (usually at a proximity hub near their plants).
- each LTC is used to supply parts to multiple proximity hubs (i.e., "VMI's").
- each LTC is located a short distance from a transportation hub, such as an air or ground hub.
- a transportation hub such as an air or ground hub.
- each LTC is located within 30 miles, and preferably within 5 miles of a transportation hub.
- each LTC is located a short distance from a transportation hub from which it is possible to make expedited shipments to a wide geographical range of locations and preferably to a nationwide network of manufacturing facilities.
- At least one LTC is located within 30 miles, and preferably within 5 miles of an air transportation hub.
- the VMI logistics system of the present invention can preferably be customized to suit the needs of the particular situation at hand.
- the direct replenishment model an example of which is depicted in Figure 3
- an LTC is provided directly next to an air hub. (Such an LTC is often referred to an "end of runway facility”.) Parts are shipped directly from suppliers to the LTC, and the parts are shipped from the LTC to the individual proximity hubs (or directly to individual manufacturing plants) as the parts are requested by particular manufacturers.
- the LTC is located directly next to an air-hub shipping facility, it is possible to reliably ship components from the LTC to a large number of proximity hubs within 24 hours.
- a single LTC is provided in Louisville, Kentucky directly next to an air hub transportation facility.
- This LTC may preferably be used to supply parts to proximity hubs throughout North America.
- the logistics network is preferably configured so that parts can be reliably delivered from the LTC to any proximity hub supplied by the LTC within 48 hours of the part being requested.
- the logistics network is also preferably configured so that the parts may be delivered from the LTC to any of the various proximity hubs supplied by the LTC via next day or same day delivery, as necessary.
- One key aspect of the current system is the fact it uses expedited delivery (such as guaranteed one-day or two-day delivery) from the central warehouse (e.g., LTC) to the various proximity hubs to produce a very predictable and reliable stream of deliveries to the proximity hubs. Because this delivery stream is so predictable, it is only necessary to store a relatively small number of parts at the individual proximity hubs. For example, in one preferred embodiment of the system, using the logistics system described above, it would only be necessary to store less than a day's worth of safety stock at each proximity hub. This is a dramatic improvement from the 6-1 days worth of safety stock that must be stored at each proximity hub using prior art VMI systems, and an even more dramatic improvement from the 30 days worth of safety stock that many manufacturers require in light of the uncertainties associated with prior art VMI systems.
- the amount of additional safety stock that must be stored at the warehouse to support each plant decreases as the number of plants supported by the warehouse increases.
- the safety stock per plant ratio decreases as additional plants are added to be supported by the central warehouse.
- Another advantage of centralizing the stock of multiple plants in an LTC is that it makes tracking inventory much easier than if the parts were stored in multiple, remote proximity hubs. This is due to the fact that a single 3PL and a single inventory management system can be used to track all of the inventory within the LTC. As discussed in more detail below, tins can lead to enhanced management capabilities and visibility for both suppliers and manufacturers.
- a further advantage of centralizing the stock of multiple plants (regardless of whether the plants are owned by a single or multiple manufacturers) in an LTC is that it makes re-allocating parts from one plant to another (and/or from one manufacturer to another) substantially easier than if the parts were stored in multiple proximity hubs.
- VMI systems in order to re-allocate a part from one plant to another, it is necessary to identify a suitable part at another plant's proximity hub (which is difficult due to the limited visibility associated with prior art systems). If such a part is located, the part must then be physically shipped from its current proximity hub to the proximity hub associated with the plant to which the part was being reallocated. This process is time consuming, and expensive.
- the system includes a relational database that stores information regarding the current allocation of each part that is located at the LTC. To reallocate a part from one plant to another, a user simply updates this database to reflect the new reallocation.
- the user may be, for example, a 3PL employee who is processing a reallocation request received from a manufacturer.
- parts may be freely allocated between different plants owned by a single contract manufacturer or OEM.
- parts from Dell's Oregon facility may be reallocated to Dell's Florida facility to accommodate the spike in demand.
- parts may also be freely allocated between different plants owned by different contract manufacturers or OEM's.
- the supplier can simply reallocate parts from Compaq's Texas facility to Dell's Florida facility.
- a supplier's ability to perform such re-allocations will, of course, depend upon the terms of the supplier's current agreements with the individual contract manufacturers and OEM's, hi one embodiment of the invention, in order to assure that reallocations are made only by properly authorized individuals, all reallocations will be made by 3PL employees, such as 3PL business analysts.
- the LTC's may be configured for performing value-added services on parts while the parts are being stored at the LTC. This eliminates the need to ship the parts to an outside facility to have these services completed.
- value-added services may, for example, include labeling services, programming services, and kitting services.
- labeling services include stamping parts with an appropriate part name and/or part number.
- progranrming services include loading software onto component parts, such as computer chips.
- kitting services include assembling several individual parts into a kit.
- parent parts are parts that may be used in several different products, either with or without modification.
- a single type of computer chip may be used in a particular model of Dell computer, a particular model of Compaq computer, and a particular video game system offered by Microsoft.
- a stockpile of the parent part can be maintained at the LTC and appropriately labeled at the LTC when it is determined that the product will shipped to a certain manufacturer.
- a single parent part (such as a computer chip) may be programmed to perform different functions within a single product, or within several different products.
- a single computer chip may be programmed to perform a first function in a Compaq computer or a second function in the same Compaq computer.
- the same computer chip may be programmed to perform a entirely different third function in a Dell computer.
- a stockpile of the parent part can be maintained at the LTC and appropriately programmed and labeled at the LTC when the ultimate function and manufacturer is identified for the computer chip.
- a single parent part may be used to satisfy an order for several different individual parts reduces the amount of safety stock that must be maintained to assure a proper supply of the different individual parts.
- Figure 4 generally depicts the flow of how value added services would preferably occur at the LTC.
- parent parts would arrive at the LTC. (Such parts are depicted in the left-hand block shown in this figure.) When these parts arrive at the plant they are associated with a parent part number that is provided by the component supplier (CS) that manufactures the part.
- CS component supplier
- the part is labeled with the appropriate brand name and manufacturing facility label.
- This labeling process can be initiated manually, automatically by the system, or in any other manner known in the art.
- the part is associated with a new part number that reflects the fact that the part has been labeled for use by the particular contract manufacturer. Parts that have undergone a first value-added service, such as labeling are indicated by the middle block within Figure 4.
- the system determines how the parent part is to be configured for operation, the part is configured at the LTC in the appropriate manner. For example, at this stage, a computer chip may be loaded with the appropriate software.
- the part may also be labeled at this stage to indicate the functionality of the part (which may correspond to the functionality of the software loaded onto the part) with a unique part number.
- any value-added services are performed on the parent parts shortly before they are shipped to the manufacturer for use. This preserves the generic nature of the parent parts as long as possible, which maximizes the amount of time that it possible to easily reallocate the parts to other plants and/or manufacturers.
- the "direct replenishment" model described above includes somewhat increased transportation costs. These transportation costs are incurred because expedited shipping is used to transport components from the LTC to the individual proximity hubs. However, the slightly increased transportation costs associated with the system of the present invention are offset by the increased savings in inventory-related costs, provided the cost of each component part is above a certain level. Thus, the "direct replenishment" model is generally cost-effective for high-cost parts (e.g., parts that cost over $4 each). In one example, in which each part costs $25, the reduction in logistics-related costs associated with a "regional replacement" logistics model is over 30%.
- the reduced inventory costs provided by the system described above may be offset by the higher transportation costs associated with expedited shipping.
- the model described above may not be cost-effective for some mid-priced parts.
- the direct replenishment model may be modified to use the principles described above in a cost-effective manner for transporting mid-priced parts by using a modified version of the direct replenishment model called the "regional replenishment model". A graphic depiction of an example of such a model is shown in Figure 5.
- each LTC is still preferably located close to a shipping hub.
- one or more of the shipping hubs is a ground hub rather than an air hub. Because each LTC only supplies proximity hubs within a limited geographic area, expedited air delivery between the LTC and the proximity hubs is not normally necessary. However, because the LTC is preferably located at the shipping hub, and because the distance between the LTC and each proximity hub is preferably relatively short, it is still possible to provide fast, reliable deliveries between the LTC and the proximity hubs, even without expedited air delivery.
- regional replacement model may not be cost effective. For example, for products that cost less than one cent, the inventory-related saving associated with using one or more LTC's may not offset the additional logistics costs associated with implementing the LTC s.
- the vehicles can be re-loaded with finished products from the manufacturer.
- the vehicles may then transport the finished products to the LTC for storage and/or distribution.
- the LTC's are preferably located directly adjacent a transportation hub, which may be used to both: (1) transport parts or other items from the LTC to a manufacturing facility, and (2) transport parts, sub- assemblies, finished products or other items from the manufacturing facility back to the LTC.
- the transportation hub may also be used to ship finished products to customers.
- the transportation hub may be used to expedite shipment of a finished product from the manufacturing facility to an end customer.
- the LTC's may also be equipped to perform value-added services on the finished products, such as labeling or kitting the products before shipping. This allows manufacturers to minimize the time it takes to deliver its completed products to market.
- the inventive system and method preferably utilizes time- definite transportation. This results in minimal variability in the supply of parts to the proximity hubs. 2.
- the inventive techniques result in a large reduction in total inventory, and thus inventory-related costs.
- a single LTC can be used to service VMI's within a very large geographical region. For example, a single LTC in Louisville can be used to provide service to all of the VMI's within a network of VMI's spread throughout North America.
- the system is configured to allow users to place orders up to midnight on a first day and receive their order by noon the next morning.
- the associated demand aggregation reduces forecast variations.
- the system includes a centralized computer system with visibility features that allow all participants in the supply chain to view the current status and allocation of component parts as the component parts travel through the supply chain.
- the system is configured to allow suppliers to view the current location, status, and allocation of all of their component parts as the parts are transported from the supplier to the manufacturer.
- this information includes information regarding the location, status, and allocation of the part during each of the following legs of transportation: (1) from the supplier to the LTC; (2) within the LTC; (3) from the LTC to the appropriate proximity hub; (4) within the proximity hub; (5) from the proximity hub to the manufacturing plant; and (6) within the manufacturing plant.
- the current location information displayed by the system for a particular part typically indicates the current physical location of the part. Such information might indicate, for example, that a particular part is on UPS Flight 101.
- the current status information displayed by the system preferably includes any relevant status information, such as whether the part is being held in customs, whether the part is being uploaded with software, and whether the part is in the process of being labeled.
- the current allocation information displayed by the system indicates whether the part has been allocated to a particular manufacturer (and/or manufacturing plant) and, if so, which manufacturer (and/or manufacturing plant) the part has been allocated to.
- the system is configured to allow suppliers to modify the allocation of their parts on-line.
- a supplier may log onto the system and notice that a current allocation of 1000 units of Part X to Manufacturer A is too much, and that a current allocation of 500 units of Part X to Manufacturer B is too little.
- the system preferably allows the supplier (or a logistics representative working at the request of the supplier) to easily modify the allocations, as desired.
- the supplier could modify the current allocations so that 750 units of Part X are allocated to Manufacturer A, and so that 750 units of Part X are allocated to Manufacturer B.
- Such a parent part may also have different part numbers that are determined by how the parent part is finally configured before delivery to the manufacturer.
- a computer chip may be referred to as "Part 575" when loaded with a first type of software, but as “Part 723" when loaded with a second type of software.
- the system is configured so that it automatically tracks the current part number of any given part, and stores a history of the various part numbers assigned to the part. This is preferably done using known database techniques.
- a blank chip may arrive at an LTC as part number AlOO.
- the chip may then be allocated to Compaq's San Antonio, Texas manufacturing facility.
- the part number may change to the corresponding Compaq number for the part - C600.
- Compaq may decide that it will no longer use part C600 in its products, but Dell may decide to start using a version of this part that is loaded with a particular software.
- the supplier may first reallocate the part from Compaq to Dell.
- a system configured for performing the steps of: (1) assigning a first identification indicia (e.g., a first part number) to an item within the central warehouse; (2) updating a database to associate the first identification indicia with the item; (3) receiving a request to reallocate the item from a first entity (e.g., a first manufacturer) to a second entity (e.g., a second manufacturer); (4) in response to receiving the request, reallocating the item from the first entity to the second entity; (5) in response to the item being reallocated from the first entity to the second entity, assigning a second identification indicia (e.g., a second part number) to the item; and (6) updating the database to associate the second identification indicia with the item.
- a first identification indicia e.g., a first part number
- the system preferably keeps track of the history of part number changes so that the supplier or other system users can later view this information.
- the history includes one or more part numbers that were formally associated with a particular part.
- the history includes all of the part numbers that were formally associated with the part since it entered the central warehouse.
- the system maintains, in a database, a part number key that includes all of the various part numbers that may correspond to a certain part.
- the key may indicate that Supplier A's part number AlOO corresponds to each of: (1) Dell's part number D999; (2) Compaq's part number C100; and (3) Hewlett Packard's part number HP200. This allows the system to better track parts as the configuration and allocation of the parts changes over time.
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (5)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
AU2003230640A AU2003230640A1 (en) | 2002-03-11 | 2003-03-11 | Inventory management system for reducing overall warehouse and pipeline inventory |
CA002477551A CA2477551A1 (en) | 2002-03-11 | 2003-03-11 | Inventory management system for reducing overall warehouse and pipeline inventory |
MXPA04008805A MXPA04008805A (en) | 2002-03-11 | 2003-03-11 | Inventory management system for reducing overall warehouse and pipeline inventory. |
JP2003577089A JP4061275B2 (en) | 2002-03-11 | 2003-03-11 | Inventory management system to reduce overall inventory in warehouses and pipelines |
EP03723727A EP1483716A4 (en) | 2002-03-11 | 2003-03-11 | Inventory management system for reducing overall warehouse and pipeline inventory |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US36360402P | 2002-03-11 | 2002-03-11 | |
US60/363,604 | 2002-03-11 |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2003079153A2 true WO2003079153A2 (en) | 2003-09-25 |
WO2003079153A3 WO2003079153A3 (en) | 2004-02-19 |
Family
ID=28041785
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2003/007634 WO2003079153A2 (en) | 2002-03-11 | 2003-03-11 | Inventory management system for reducing overall warehouse and pipeline inventory |
Country Status (8)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US7016764B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1483716A4 (en) |
JP (1) | JP4061275B2 (en) |
CN (1) | CN1643528A (en) |
AU (1) | AU2003230640A1 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2477551A1 (en) |
MX (1) | MXPA04008805A (en) |
WO (1) | WO2003079153A2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (34)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2002333915A (en) * | 2001-05-08 | 2002-11-22 | Daikin Ind Ltd | Method for procurement of component and device for the same |
GB0212646D0 (en) * | 2002-05-31 | 2002-07-10 | Trading Labels Ltd | A control apparatus |
TW589554B (en) * | 2002-06-06 | 2004-06-01 | Hon Hai Prec Ind Co Ltd | A system and method for forecasting and ordering within enterprise |
US20060085308A1 (en) * | 2003-03-17 | 2006-04-20 | Abanco International, Llc | System and method for sales and service reconciliation |
WO2004084031A2 (en) * | 2003-03-17 | 2004-09-30 | Abanco International Llc | System and method for sales and inventory reconciliation |
US8364547B2 (en) * | 2003-03-17 | 2013-01-29 | Gate Gourmet Switzerland, Gmbh | System for real-time sales and inventory reconciliation |
TW200426645A (en) * | 2003-05-30 | 2004-12-01 | Hon Hai Prec Ind Co Ltd | Logistics management system and method |
TW200515208A (en) * | 2003-10-24 | 2005-05-01 | Hon Hai Prec Ind Co Ltd | System and method for querying inventory |
US20050242068A1 (en) * | 2004-04-19 | 2005-11-03 | Boisvert John A | Systems and methods for providing plasma arc torch parts and inventories to distributors |
US7142118B2 (en) * | 2004-06-22 | 2006-11-28 | Sri/Surgical Express, Inc. | Management and distribution of surgical supplies within an RFID enabled network |
JP4217700B2 (en) * | 2005-07-22 | 2009-02-04 | 三井倉庫株式会社 | Transaction management server control method, transaction management server, and program |
US20070100675A1 (en) * | 2005-11-03 | 2007-05-03 | Boris Kneisel | Supply chain workload balancing |
US20070156496A1 (en) * | 2005-12-02 | 2007-07-05 | Avery Robert L | Methods and systems for managing aircraft maintenance and material supply |
US20100299181A1 (en) * | 2006-05-18 | 2010-11-25 | Allotz.Com Limited | Management of inventory allocations |
US10198494B2 (en) * | 2006-05-18 | 2019-02-05 | Allotz.Com Limited | Control of distributed databases |
US20080040197A1 (en) * | 2006-08-11 | 2008-02-14 | United Technologies Corporation | Method, program, and system for monitoring supplier capacities |
US20080082346A1 (en) * | 2006-09-29 | 2008-04-03 | Hoopes John M | System and method for automated processing of returns |
US7775431B2 (en) | 2007-01-17 | 2010-08-17 | Metrologic Instruments, Inc. | Method of and apparatus for shipping, tracking and delivering a shipment of packages employing the capture of shipping document images and recognition-processing thereof initiated from the point of shipment pickup and completed while the shipment is being transported to its first scanning point to facilitate early customs clearance processing and shorten the delivery time of packages to point of destination |
US8417550B2 (en) | 2007-08-02 | 2013-04-09 | Target Brands, Inc. | Inland freight management |
US8131584B2 (en) * | 2007-08-02 | 2012-03-06 | Target Brands, Inc. | Gateway balancing |
US8843410B2 (en) * | 2008-01-22 | 2014-09-23 | United Parcel Services Of America, Inc. | Systems, methods, and computer program products for supply chain finance |
KR100888749B1 (en) * | 2008-02-25 | 2009-03-17 | 주식회사 이지메디컴 | System and method for purchase and distribution managing of hospital articles |
US8364607B2 (en) * | 2009-08-19 | 2013-01-29 | United Parcel Service Of America, Inc. | Shipment flow validation systems and methods |
WO2013134309A1 (en) * | 2012-03-05 | 2013-09-12 | Ingersoll-Rand Company | Apparatus, method, and system for conducting a transaction |
CN103034933B (en) * | 2012-06-27 | 2016-05-25 | 郭思宇 | A kind of commodity distribution control method based on multistage storage |
WO2014205273A2 (en) | 2013-06-19 | 2014-12-24 | United States Postal Service | System and method for providing real-time tracking of items in a distribution network |
US9710771B2 (en) * | 2014-02-10 | 2017-07-18 | Trimble Inc. | Real-time crop processing management |
JP6378636B2 (en) * | 2014-05-15 | 2018-08-22 | 株式会社神戸製鋼所 | In-process inventory quantity calculation device, in-process inventory quantity calculation method, and in-process inventory quantity calculation program |
CA3007074A1 (en) * | 2015-12-09 | 2017-06-15 | Fujitsu Limited | Display method, recording medium, and display control device |
MX2018006970A (en) * | 2015-12-09 | 2018-09-05 | Fujitsu Ltd | Display method, display program, and display control device. |
CN106991544B (en) * | 2016-01-20 | 2021-06-29 | 菜鸟智能物流控股有限公司 | Allocation system and allocation method |
US11455595B2 (en) * | 2019-03-14 | 2022-09-27 | Attabotics Inc | Multi-entity inventory management using storage bin and inventory reassignment |
US20230214773A1 (en) * | 2022-01-03 | 2023-07-06 | International Business Machines Corporation | Equipment maintenance and automated inventory management using predictive modeling |
CN116362646B (en) * | 2023-05-31 | 2023-09-26 | 北京京东乾石科技有限公司 | Logistics network upgrading method and device |
Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5586037A (en) * | 1991-04-01 | 1996-12-17 | Pi Electronics, Inc. | Automated self-service mail processing and storing systems |
US5631827A (en) * | 1993-09-28 | 1997-05-20 | Tandata Corporation | Logistics system for automating transportation of goods |
Family Cites Families (58)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPS6062449A (en) * | 1983-09-09 | 1985-04-10 | Toyota Motor Corp | Job management method in production line and work indicating device available in its enforcement |
AU5342890A (en) | 1989-03-21 | 1990-10-22 | Morris Epstein | Integrated electronic parts warehousing and distribution system and method |
JP2794837B2 (en) * | 1989-10-16 | 1998-09-10 | トヨタ自動車株式会社 | Parts delivery instruction device |
US5063506A (en) * | 1989-10-23 | 1991-11-05 | International Business Machines Corp. | Cost optimization system for supplying parts |
US5793638A (en) * | 1990-12-25 | 1998-08-11 | Kabushiki Kaisha Komatsu Seisakusho | Work instruction system and conveyance control system in production line |
JPH069022A (en) | 1992-06-23 | 1994-01-18 | Sekisui Chem Co Ltd | Production physical distribution simulation system |
US5412576A (en) * | 1992-12-17 | 1995-05-02 | Honeywell Inc. | Selective assembly of component kits |
JP2964851B2 (en) * | 1993-09-20 | 1999-10-18 | トヨタ自動車株式会社 | Operation planning method for parts delivery service, device therefor, and parts delivery service management method |
EP0787334B1 (en) * | 1994-10-14 | 1998-08-05 | United Parcel Service Of America, Inc. | Multi-stage parcel tracking system |
US5699259A (en) * | 1995-03-01 | 1997-12-16 | Siemens Business Communication Systems, Inc. | Inventory control procedure |
US6182053B1 (en) * | 1996-03-26 | 2001-01-30 | Recovery Sales Corporation | Method and apparatus for managing inventory |
US5959568A (en) * | 1996-06-26 | 1999-09-28 | Par Goverment Systems Corporation | Measuring distance |
US5884300A (en) * | 1997-05-01 | 1999-03-16 | At&T Wireless Services Inc. | Inventory pipeline management system |
US6098892A (en) * | 1998-05-27 | 2000-08-08 | Peoples, Jr.; Max J. | Device for conversion from a pharmaceutical identification number to a standardized number and method for doing the same |
US6397131B1 (en) * | 1997-08-08 | 2002-05-28 | Management Systems Data Service, Inc. | Method and system for facilitating vehicle inspection to detect previous damage and repairs |
US6324522B2 (en) * | 1997-09-15 | 2001-11-27 | Mro Software, Inc. | Electronic information network for inventory control and transfer |
US6049742A (en) * | 1997-09-26 | 2000-04-11 | International Business Machines Corporation | Projected supply planning matching assets with demand in microelectronics manufacturing |
US6134593A (en) * | 1997-09-30 | 2000-10-17 | Cccomplete, Inc. | Automated method for electronic software distribution |
US6338045B1 (en) * | 1998-01-20 | 2002-01-08 | John Charalambos Pappas | Apparatus for and method of managing and tracking activities and parts |
US6148291A (en) * | 1998-01-26 | 2000-11-14 | K & T Of Lorain, Ltd. | Container and inventory monitoring methods and systems |
US6366829B1 (en) * | 1998-10-06 | 2002-04-02 | J. P. Donmoyer, Inc. | Bulk inventory network system (BINS) |
US6078900A (en) * | 1998-10-23 | 2000-06-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method for estimating stock levels in production-distribution networks with inventory control |
US6463345B1 (en) * | 1999-01-04 | 2002-10-08 | International Business Machines Corporation | Regenerative available to promise |
US6889197B2 (en) * | 2000-01-12 | 2005-05-03 | Isuppli Inc. | Supply chain architecture |
JP2001215231A (en) * | 2000-02-01 | 2001-08-10 | Horiba Ltd | System for ordering component of analysis system and method of ordering component of analysis system |
US20010032222A1 (en) * | 2000-02-08 | 2001-10-18 | Ricoh Company, Ltd. | System, method and computer accessible storage medium, for creating and editing structured parts list |
EP1277137A4 (en) * | 2000-03-13 | 2005-09-07 | Robotic Vision Systems | Secure tracking of articles |
JP3758454B2 (en) * | 2000-03-16 | 2006-03-22 | 株式会社デンソー | Parts information management system |
JP2001283067A (en) * | 2000-03-29 | 2001-10-12 | Seiko Epson Corp | Method and system for managing stock reservation |
US20020026384A1 (en) * | 2000-03-31 | 2002-02-28 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Data storage, management, and delivery method |
US20010034674A1 (en) * | 2000-04-19 | 2001-10-25 | Hoffman Roger P. | Sample shipping and storing apparatus and method |
US20020143862A1 (en) * | 2000-05-19 | 2002-10-03 | Atitania Ltd. | Method and apparatus for transferring information between a source and a destination on a network |
US20020095232A1 (en) * | 2000-06-01 | 2002-07-18 | Jorgenson William L. | Transactional supply chain system and method |
CN1659553A (en) * | 2000-06-29 | 2005-08-24 | 美国联合包裹服务公司 | Systems and methods for end-to-end fulfillment and supply chain management |
WO2002004329A1 (en) * | 2000-07-11 | 2002-01-17 | Honda Of America Mfg., Inc. | Super cross-dock logistics system and method |
US7747572B2 (en) * | 2000-07-28 | 2010-06-29 | Waypoint Global Ii, Inc. | Method and system for supply chain product and process development collaboration |
US6356802B1 (en) * | 2000-08-04 | 2002-03-12 | Paceco Corp. | Method and apparatus for locating cargo containers |
JP4540194B2 (en) * | 2000-08-22 | 2010-09-08 | フォルクスワーゲン グループ ジャパン 株式会社 | Centralized inventory management system and method |
US7062455B1 (en) * | 2000-09-07 | 2006-06-13 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for tracking computer hardware and software assets by allocating and tagging the asset with an asset tag barcode having a software distribution system (SDS) number and verifying the asset tag barcode upon entry of the asset at a destination site |
US6560508B1 (en) * | 2000-10-31 | 2003-05-06 | Joseph E. Radican | Standard parts metering system |
US6789729B1 (en) * | 2000-11-02 | 2004-09-14 | Ford Motor Company | Method for receiving and shipping items |
JP2002137808A (en) * | 2000-11-06 | 2002-05-14 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | Method and device for material procurement and material management |
US20020059121A1 (en) * | 2000-11-14 | 2002-05-16 | Schneider Pamela R. | System and method for remote warehouse management |
US7136832B2 (en) * | 2000-12-07 | 2006-11-14 | Savi Technology, Inc. | Supply chain visibility for real-time tracking of goods |
JP2002202805A (en) * | 2000-12-28 | 2002-07-19 | Toshiba Corp | System and method for order-reception assembly and production |
US20020128944A1 (en) * | 2000-12-29 | 2002-09-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | Public hub employing a trusted agent to facilitate the exchange of commodities |
US7359874B2 (en) * | 2001-01-08 | 2008-04-15 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for facilitating parts procurement and production planning across an extended supply chain |
US20020099579A1 (en) * | 2001-01-22 | 2002-07-25 | Stowell David P. M. | Stateless, event-monitoring architecture for performance-based supply chain management system and method |
US7212976B2 (en) * | 2001-01-22 | 2007-05-01 | W.W. Grainger, Inc. | Method for selecting a fulfillment plan for moving an item within an integrated supply chain |
US20020116241A1 (en) * | 2001-02-21 | 2002-08-22 | Virender Sandhu | Enterprise resource planning system for ordering, tracking and shipping goods from a seller to a buyer |
US7100826B1 (en) * | 2001-03-26 | 2006-09-05 | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | Barcode marking of wafer products for inventory control |
US6909927B2 (en) * | 2001-04-06 | 2005-06-21 | Ricoh Electronics, Inc. | Apparatus and method for monitoring manufacturing status |
JP2002318870A (en) * | 2001-04-23 | 2002-10-31 | Honda Motor Co Ltd | Repair part order control system |
US20030115115A1 (en) * | 2001-08-25 | 2003-06-19 | Ouchi Norman Ken | Private exchange catalog system and methods |
US8255235B2 (en) * | 2001-09-07 | 2012-08-28 | United States Postal Service | Item tracking and anticipated delivery confirmation system method |
US6988111B2 (en) * | 2001-11-29 | 2006-01-17 | I2 Technologies Us, Inc. | Mapping between part numbers that are based on different part numbering schemes |
AU2003260363A1 (en) * | 2002-04-05 | 2003-10-20 | Principal Software Developments Limited | A supply chain management system and method |
US7273172B2 (en) * | 2004-07-14 | 2007-09-25 | United Parcel Service Of America, Inc. | Methods and systems for automating inventory and dispatch procedures at a staging area |
-
2003
- 2003-03-11 WO PCT/US2003/007634 patent/WO2003079153A2/en active Application Filing
- 2003-03-11 AU AU2003230640A patent/AU2003230640A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2003-03-11 CN CN03805792.1A patent/CN1643528A/en active Pending
- 2003-03-11 JP JP2003577089A patent/JP4061275B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2003-03-11 EP EP03723727A patent/EP1483716A4/en not_active Ceased
- 2003-03-11 US US10/387,154 patent/US7016764B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2003-03-11 CA CA002477551A patent/CA2477551A1/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2003-03-11 MX MXPA04008805A patent/MXPA04008805A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
-
2005
- 2005-05-12 US US11/127,655 patent/US7293707B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Patent Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5586037A (en) * | 1991-04-01 | 1996-12-17 | Pi Electronics, Inc. | Automated self-service mail processing and storing systems |
US5631827A (en) * | 1993-09-28 | 1997-05-20 | Tandata Corporation | Logistics system for automating transportation of goods |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See also references of EP1483716A2 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN1643528A (en) | 2005-07-20 |
JP4061275B2 (en) | 2008-03-12 |
US7293707B2 (en) | 2007-11-13 |
MXPA04008805A (en) | 2004-12-14 |
EP1483716A2 (en) | 2004-12-08 |
CA2477551A1 (en) | 2003-09-25 |
JP2005519828A (en) | 2005-07-07 |
US20050209731A1 (en) | 2005-09-22 |
US20030200006A1 (en) | 2003-10-23 |
EP1483716A4 (en) | 2006-06-07 |
WO2003079153A3 (en) | 2004-02-19 |
AU2003230640A8 (en) | 2003-09-29 |
US7016764B2 (en) | 2006-03-21 |
AU2003230640A1 (en) | 2003-09-29 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7293707B2 (en) | Inventory management system for reducing overall warehouse and pipeline inventory | |
Kilger et al. | Demand fulfilment and ATP | |
Landers et al. | The virtual warehousing concept | |
US20020095307A1 (en) | System and method for inventory and capacity availability management | |
US20020116241A1 (en) | Enterprise resource planning system for ordering, tracking and shipping goods from a seller to a buyer | |
US8494925B2 (en) | Systems and methods for processing an order | |
US8170899B2 (en) | Supply chain reservation | |
US20170255903A1 (en) | Determining delivery dates for multiple product types | |
EP1350187A1 (en) | System and method for inventory and capacity availability management | |
Woźniakowski et al. | ERP systems and warehouse management by WMS | |
US20030233264A1 (en) | Manufacturing order scheduling and materials replenishment system | |
US20190066238A1 (en) | System and computer program for optimized execution in a value chain network | |
US20040010442A1 (en) | Descriptive characteristics for sales forecasts and sales orders | |
AU4183800A (en) | System and method of scheduling manufacturing resources | |
US20050203665A1 (en) | Inventory management system for reducing overall warehouse and pipeline inventory | |
JPH1087036A (en) | Stock allocating method, and deciding method of distribution mode and stocking position, in physical distribution system | |
Cohen et al. | After-sales service supply chains: a benchmark update of the north american computer industry | |
Kilger | Computer assembly | |
US20040117230A1 (en) | Recalculating planned requests | |
Luo et al. | A Case Study of Supply Chain Management in a Manufacturing Company in China | |
Cholewa-Wójcik et al. | Supply Chain Risk Management in the Content Delivery Network (CDN) Industry | |
Viswanadham | Supply chain engineering and automation | |
US20090037209A1 (en) | Packaging Specification | |
Knolmayer et al. | SAP systems for supply chain management | |
BEAL | International logistics: the extend of outsourcing by manufacturers and impact on the transport industry. |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NO NZ OM PH PL PT RO RU SC SD SE SG SK SL TJ TM TN TR TT TZ UA UG UZ VN YU ZA ZM ZW |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LU MC NL PT RO SE SI SK TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG |
|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
DFPE | Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101) | ||
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2003723727 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2477551 Country of ref document: CA |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: PA/a/2004/008805 Country of ref document: MX Ref document number: 20038057921 Country of ref document: CN |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2003577089 Country of ref document: JP |
|
WWP | Wipo information: published in national office |
Ref document number: 2003723727 Country of ref document: EP |