WO2005055000A2 - Method for problem formulation and for obtaining solutions from a data base - Google Patents

Method for problem formulation and for obtaining solutions from a data base Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2005055000A2
WO2005055000A2 PCT/US2004/039649 US2004039649W WO2005055000A2 WO 2005055000 A2 WO2005055000 A2 WO 2005055000A2 US 2004039649 W US2004039649 W US 2004039649W WO 2005055000 A2 WO2005055000 A2 WO 2005055000A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
query
knowledge base
natural language
knowledge
reformulation
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2004/039649
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO2005055000A3 (en
Inventor
James Todhunter
Original Assignee
Invention Machine Corporation
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Invention Machine Corporation filed Critical Invention Machine Corporation
Priority to KR1020067012808A priority Critical patent/KR101171220B1/en
Priority to JP2006541735A priority patent/JP2007513416A/en
Priority to EP04812213A priority patent/EP1697857A4/en
Publication of WO2005055000A2 publication Critical patent/WO2005055000A2/en
Publication of WO2005055000A3 publication Critical patent/WO2005055000A3/en

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06NCOMPUTING ARRANGEMENTS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
    • G06N5/00Computing arrangements using knowledge-based models
    • G06N5/04Inference or reasoning models
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/04Forecasting or optimisation specially adapted for administrative or management purposes, e.g. linear programming or "cutting stock problem"

Definitions

  • TechOptimizer An example of such a tool, called TechOptimizer, is a computer system marketed by Invention Machine Corporation of Boston, Massachusetts.
  • the technology used in TechOptimizer to assist in problem analysis is partially described in U.S. Patent No. 6,056,428 and U.S. Patent No. 6,202,043.
  • the system disclosed in these two patents is fully described in TechOptimizer user guide, version 4.0, Invention Machine Corporation, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • the TechOptimizer software suite includes a module, which allows a user to build a functional model of the design and/or technological process, to perform value diagnostics of the design and/or technological process, identify a better (for example, higher value) configuration of the design and/or technological process, and identify what problem has to be solved in order to implement this new configuration.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a function model diagram of a soap dispenser which includes some scrubbing material.
  • Figure 2 shows a modified version of the soap dispenser model reflecting an intended change to the design of the bottle which eliminates the scrubbing material, yet preserves the scrubbing function by delegating that function to the liquid soap.
  • This alternative design contains a new engineering problem that must be resolved in order to validate that this design is achievable— how can liquid soap perform a scrubbing function?
  • Figure 3 illustrates how a problem analysis tool might catalog and identify that problem for the engineer. Once the problems have been identified, the user must conduct independent research using whatever means are available to find useful information. These means could include using books, public internet search engines, private data subscription services, internal enterprise portals, or other sources of relevant technical information.
  • problem analysis tools are augmented by the inclusion of knowledge search capabilities for databases, such that when a problem is identified, it is automatically re-formulated as a natural language or Boolean query to the databases, and responses to this query from the databases are automatically provided.
  • the machine representation of a problem statement generated by the problem analysis component is converted into a query appropriate to the available knowledge search technology.
  • Different problem analysis tools will generate different specific machine representations, and similarly the target query format will vary with the knowledge search technologies applied.
  • a natural language query is suitable for search engines using semantic algorithms and a key word query for less sophisticated engines.
  • the problem statement is reformulated by translating a functional relationship into a natural language query.
  • the problem statement is reformulated by translating a node statement into a natural language query.
  • Figs. 1 , 2, and 3 are illustrative screens in the commercially available systems for solving engineering problems;
  • Fig. 4 is illustrative screen for problem identification, search query, and for a search response in a system in accordance with the principles of this invention;
  • Fig. 5 is a high-level architecture diagram of one embodiment of a system in accordance with the principles of this invention;
  • ⁇ Fig. 6 is a flow diagram of a system in accordance with the principles of this invention;
  • Fig. 7 is an illustrative screen showing a problem analysis tool for root cause analysis.
  • the problem analysis tool is augmented as shown in Fig 4 to automatically suggest possible solutions to the identified problems.
  • Such an embodiment could possess a high level architecture as shown in Figure 5 comprising problem analysis tools 12, machine representations of problem statements 14, query formulation and submission 16, selected one or more knowledge search engines 18, and searchable databases 20.
  • the system would facilitate a functional use model 22 as depicted in Figure 6 including the following steps: to perform analysis of a system and identify problems to solve 24; when a problem is identified, it is automatically reformulated as a natural language or Boolean query to the (for example, semantically indexed) database 26; the re-formulated query is submitted to the knowledge search engine which implements searching of the database 28; and responses to this query from the database are automatically provided, 30 as shown in the Solutions window of Fig. 4
  • One embodiment of this invention uses technologies described in U.S. patent No. 6,056,428 and U.S. patent No. 6,202,043 to provide problem analysis capabilities. Other problem analysis tools could be used in an alternative embodiment. This includes root cause analysis tools, for example.
  • one embodiment introduces two elements to the problem analysis tools.
  • One of these elements is a knowledge search tool.
  • Knowledge search tools also commonly referred to as search engines or database query tools
  • a knowledge search tool and a database to be searched by it are defined herein as a knowledge base.
  • the user is able to locate relevant information by presenting a properly constructed query in an appropriate .form (e.g. natural language or Boolean expression) to the knowledge search tool which searches the database and obtains results.
  • the knowledge search tool responds to the entered query by constructing a result set comprising a list of information that meets the relevancy criteria imposed by the knowledge search tool.
  • the second element introduced to the problem analysis tools is a query formulator.
  • the machine representation of a function model is used as the source of key elements with which to build a query.
  • the arrow labeled "scrub” which connects the system component labeled "liquid soap” to the system component labeled “hand” represents the need to find a mechanism by which liquid soap can be made to scrub hands.
  • the connecting arrow is interpreted as a desired action (scrub) and the system component labeled "hand” is interpreted as the object of the desired action ( these are displayed at "Problem Description”).
  • the Problems & Solutions portion of the screen provides proposed approaches to solve the problem.
  • the system constructs the query "How to scrub the hand?" as a query to be submitted to the knowledge search tool by automatic reformulation by translating the functional relationship into a natural language query.
  • the query is shown in the Solutions portion of the screen which also shows the several types of knowledge bases that are available to the user. These knowledge bases are resident in three possible places. One is on the user's own computer memory, or portable memory devices such as CDs that can accessed at the user's location. Another is called Corporate Knowledge which is typically on one or more servers resident or privately accessible to user's within the organization such as a corporation. Another is publically accessible search engines and databases such as Google (a search engine) and the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office patent collection (a searchable database).
  • an entry in the Problem & Solutions window will be automatically selected (or it can be programmed to allow the user to select) and similarly will automatically start the searching of the three categories of databases.
  • the software allows configuration by a user to, for example, rewrite the Query, and to limit the search.
  • the automatic (or user selected) search of all three categories is underway (see "searching" on the right side).
  • searching is completed with 3 relevant results in the Corporate Knowledge database, but no results in I* the other databases.
  • Fig ⁇ shows the results of the search posted along with necessary links to access the results.
  • Figure 10 depicts a graphical representation corresponding to the results of using a problem analysis tool which automated the process of root cause analysis.
  • the result of the root cause analysis has a machine representation which is a directed graph wherein each node, a, b, c, of the graph represents a problem statement and each edge (shown as arrows connecting the nodes) of the graph represents a cause-effect relationship.
  • the machine representation of each problem statement contains a well formed natural language fragment.

Abstract

Problem analysis tool automatically reformulates a problem statement into a natural language or Boolean query (26) that is automatically submitted via a knowledge search tool (18) to a database (20), and responses to this query from the database (20) are automatically provided.

Description

IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE UTILITY PATENT APPLICATION
METHOD FOR PROBLEM FORMULATION AND FOR OBTAINING SOLUTIONS FROM A DATA BASE
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION The process of innovation within organizations remains largely untouched by the general trend toward improved efficiency through automation. The traditional model of stimulating innovative thought is through the application of psychological techniques such as brainstorming. The techniques bring limited improvement to the process. More recently, there have emerged a number of computer based technologies which can be applied by a researcher or designer who is considering the creation or improvement of a device, process, or other system. These technologies can be defined as problem analysis tools. Problem analysis tools assist the user by enabling the user to consider a complex system and identify discrete problems which should be addressed. These tools accomplish this by providing computer based interfaces which assist in the application of well understood methods of problem analysis including, but are not limited to, root cause analysis, TRIZ, value engineering, function analysis, and system benchmarking. An example of such a tool, called TechOptimizer, is a computer system marketed by Invention Machine Corporation of Boston, Massachusetts. The technology used in TechOptimizer to assist in problem analysis is partially described in U.S. Patent No. 6,056,428 and U.S. Patent No. 6,202,043. The system disclosed in these two patents is fully described in TechOptimizer user guide, version 4.0, Invention Machine Corporation, Boston, Massachusetts.
The TechOptimizer software suite includes a module, which allows a user to build a functional model of the design and/or technological process, to perform value diagnostics of the design and/or technological process, identify a better (for example, higher value) configuration of the design and/or technological process, and identify what problem has to be solved in order to implement this new configuration.
The deficiency with problem analysis tools is that while they greatly aid in the identification of specific issues to be address, they do not provide solutions to the identified problems. This can be understood by considering the following illustrative example. Consider an engineer who is trying to simplify the design of a soap dispenser. Figure 1 illustrates a function model diagram of a soap dispenser which includes some scrubbing material. Figure 2 shows a modified version of the soap dispenser model reflecting an intended change to the design of the bottle which eliminates the scrubbing material, yet preserves the scrubbing function by delegating that function to the liquid soap. This alternative design contains a new engineering problem that must be resolved in order to validate that this design is achievable— how can liquid soap perform a scrubbing function? Figure 3 illustrates how a problem analysis tool might catalog and identify that problem for the engineer. Once the problems have been identified, the user must conduct independent research using whatever means are available to find useful information. These means could include using books, public internet search engines, private data subscription services, internal enterprise portals, or other sources of relevant technical information.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION The present invention provides a method and system for using computer based systems to provide automated knowledge search capabilities in conjunction with problem analysis functions. In accordance with the principles of this invention, in one embodiment, problem analysis tools are augmented by the inclusion of knowledge search capabilities for databases, such that when a problem is identified, it is automatically re-formulated as a natural language or Boolean query to the databases, and responses to this query from the databases are automatically provided. In said embodiment, the machine representation of a problem statement generated by the problem analysis component is converted into a query appropriate to the available knowledge search technology. Different problem analysis tools will generate different specific machine representations, and similarly the target query format will vary with the knowledge search technologies applied. For example, a natural language query is suitable for search engines using semantic algorithms and a key word query for less sophisticated engines. There are a number of specific techniques which may be used to perform the mapping from a specific machine representation to a desired query, such techniques consisting of the steps of extracting key elements from the machine representation of the problem statement and subsequently reformulating those extracted elements to form a properly formed query. In particular embodiment of a tool that uses functional analysis, the problem statement is reformulated by translating a functional relationship into a natural language query. In another embodiment of a tool that uses root cause analysis, the problem statement is reformulated by translating a node statement into a natural language query.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS Figs. 1 , 2, and 3 are illustrative screens in the commercially available systems for solving engineering problems; Fig. 4 is illustrative screen for problem identification, search query, and for a search response in a system in accordance with the principles of this invention; Fig. 5 is a high-level architecture diagram of one embodiment of a system in accordance with the principles of this invention; ^ Fig. 6 is a flow diagram of a system in accordance with the principles of this invention; and Fig. 7 is an illustrative screen showing a problem analysis tool for root cause analysis.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENTS OF THIS INVENTION Returning to the previously cited example illustrated by Figures 1 , 2, and 3, with the system of the present invention, the problem analysis tool is augmented as shown in Fig 4 to automatically suggest possible solutions to the identified problems. Such an embodiment could possess a high level architecture as shown in Figure 5 comprising problem analysis tools 12, machine representations of problem statements 14, query formulation and submission 16, selected one or more knowledge search engines 18, and searchable databases 20. The system would facilitate a functional use model 22 as depicted in Figure 6 including the following steps: to perform analysis of a system and identify problems to solve 24; when a problem is identified, it is automatically reformulated as a natural language or Boolean query to the (for example, semantically indexed) database 26; the re-formulated query is submitted to the knowledge search engine which implements searching of the database 28; and responses to this query from the database are automatically provided, 30 as shown in the Solutions window of Fig. 4 One embodiment of this invention uses technologies described in U.S. patent No. 6,056,428 and U.S. patent No. 6,202,043 to provide problem analysis capabilities. Other problem analysis tools could be used in an alternative embodiment. This includes root cause analysis tools, for example. In accordance with the principles of this invention one embodiment introduces two elements to the problem analysis tools. One of these elements is a knowledge search tool. Knowledge search tools (also commonly referred to as search engines or database query tools) facilitate the efficient access to information stored in computer based database systems. When applicable, a knowledge search tool and a database to be searched by it are defined herein as a knowledge base. The user is able to locate relevant information by presenting a properly constructed query in an appropriate .form (e.g. natural language or Boolean expression) to the knowledge search tool which searches the database and obtains results. The knowledge search tool responds to the entered query by constructing a result set comprising a list of information that meets the relevancy criteria imposed by the knowledge search tool. An example of such a knowledge search tool is a computer based system called Goldfire Intelligence marketed by Invention Machine Corporation, Boston, Massachusetts. The technology used in this tool is partially described in U.S. patent No. 6,167,370 The content of which is incorporated herein by reference One embodiment of this invention uses the semantic indexing and search technology described in U.S. patent No. 6,167,370 for the purpose of performing knowledge searches. It will be apparent to the skilled practitioner that any other knowledge search tool could be used in an alternative embodiment. The second element introduced to the problem analysis tools is a query formulator. In one embodiment, the machine representation of a function model is used as the source of key elements with which to build a query. For example, in Figure 2, the arrow labeled "scrub" which connects the system component labeled "liquid soap" to the system component labeled "hand" represents the need to find a mechanism by which liquid soap can be made to scrub hands. Referring to Fig S, in this example, in one embodiment, the connecting arrow is interpreted as a desired action (scrub) and the system component labeled "hand" is interpreted as the object of the desired action ( these are displayed at "Problem Description"). Along with the graphical display of the problem description the Problems & Solutions portion of the screen provides proposed approaches to solve the problem. Using the functional relationship the system constructs the query "How to scrub the hand?" as a query to be submitted to the knowledge search tool by automatic reformulation by translating the functional relationship into a natural language query. The query is shown in the Solutions portion of the screen which also shows the several types of knowledge bases that are available to the user. These knowledge bases are resident in three possible places. One is on the user's own computer memory, or portable memory devices such as CDs that can accessed at the user's location. Another is called Corporate Knowledge which is typically on one or more servers resident or privately accessible to user's within the organization such as a corporation. Another is publically accessible search engines and databases such as Google (a search engine) and the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office patent collection (a searchable database). In one embodiment, an entry in the Problem & Solutions window will be automatically selected (or it can be programmed to allow the user to select) and similarly will automatically start the searching of the three categories of databases. The software allows configuration by a user to, for example, rewrite the Query, and to limit the search. As shown in Fig 8, the automatic (or user selected) search of all three categories is underway (see "searching" on the right side). In Fig$ there is shown that searching is completed with 3 relevant results in the Corporate Knowledge database, but no results in I* the other databases. Fig^ shows the results of the search posted along with necessary links to access the results. It will be apparent to the skilled practitioner that in alternative embodiments the specific mechanism for extraction of key query elements from a given problem analysis tool's machine representation will vary with the tool as will the mechanism for construction of the automatically formed query. For example, Figure 10 depicts a graphical representation corresponding to the results of using a problem analysis tool which automated the process of root cause analysis. In this situation, the result of the root cause analysis has a machine representation which is a directed graph wherein each node, a, b, c, of the graph represents a problem statement and each edge (shown as arrows connecting the nodes) of the graph represents a cause-effect relationship. In this case, the machine representation of each problem statement contains a well formed natural language fragment. Thus, if the user wishes to address the problem that the engine runs rough, since the user has the presumed goal of preventing the identified problem, by selecting the node a, "engine runs rough" the user gives the program an assignment to create the formulation of the query which it does by generating a statement of the form "How to prevent engine runs rough?", in which the node is translated into the query statement. Since it is the case that relevant solutions to the problems identified through the use of a problem analysis tool often exist in the body of knowledge accessible via a knowledge search tool, this addition of these two new elements to the problem statement tools present immediate and compelling benefits to the user. A new model of use is enabled wherein the operations of problem analysis and applied research are no longer disjoint activities. Now, a single operation is made available which allows users to dynamically find potential solutions to issues as they are identified. This results in greater productivity as the tradition latency between problem identification and solution concept feasibility and practicability analysis is eliminated.

Claims

WHAT IS CLAIMED IS: 1. A method of obtaining solution suggestions for problems, said method comprising the steps of (1 ) problem identification; (2) automatic problem reformulation as a natural language or Boolean query; and (3) automatic submitting the above query to a database.
2. A system for obtaining solution suggestions for problems, said system including means for identification of a problem; said system including means for formulating a problem as a natural language or Boolean query; said system including a database, said system including means for submitting said query thereof to said database respectively.
3. A system for obtaining solution suggestions for problems comprising a program embodied on a computer readable storage medium, a computer having an output device, a central processing unit, a communication means to one or more knowledge search engines and databases (a knowledge search engine and a database define a knowledge base) said program comprising: a portion or portions responsive to user input to generate identification of a problem; a portion or portions to generate from the identification of the problem automatic reformulation of the problem as a natural language query; a portion or portions to automatically submit the query to at least one knowledge base; and a portion or portions to provide through the output device responses from the at least one knowledge base.
4. The system of claim 3 further wherein said problem reformulation as a natural language query is done by a portion or portions of the program that translates functional relationships into semantic relationships.
5. The system of claim 3 further wherein said portion or portions of the program to generate reformulation of the problem generate reformulation of the problem as a natural language query or as a Boolean query.
6. The system of claim 3 further wherein the at least one knowledge base is a semantic analysis knowledge base.
7. The system of claim 3 wherein the knowledge base is resident on storage medium co-located with the computer.
8. The system of claim 3 wherein the knowledge base is resident on a corporate server.
9. The system of claim 3 wherein the knowledge base is remotely accessed.
10. The system of claim 3 wherein the knowledge base is a patent collection that is remotely accessed.
11. The system of claim 3 wherein the program has a portion or portions to access a plurality of knowledge bases that are selected from; at least one knowledge base resident on a storage medium co-located with the computer, at least one knowledge base on a corporate server, at least one knowledge base accessed by an internet link.
12. The system of claim 3 wherein the query is submitted to the at least one knowledge base without intervention by a user.
13. The system of claim 3 in which identification of the problem is done an analysis of functional relationships between components under consideration and the automatic reformulation as a query is done by translating a functional relationship into a natural language query 14. The system of claim 3 in which identification of the problem is done by root cause analysis that establishes one or more nodes between events under consideration and the automatic reformulation translates a node into a natural language query 15. The system of claim 11 wherein at least one of said knowledge bases is a semantic analysis knowledge base.
PCT/US2004/039649 2003-11-26 2004-11-24 Method for problem formulation and for obtaining solutions from a data base WO2005055000A2 (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
KR1020067012808A KR101171220B1 (en) 2003-11-26 2004-11-24 Method for problem formulation and for obtaining solutions from a data base
JP2006541735A JP2007513416A (en) 2003-11-26 2004-11-24 How to formulate a problem and get a solution from a database
EP04812213A EP1697857A4 (en) 2003-11-26 2004-11-24 Method for problem formulation and for obtaining solutions from a data base

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/723,633 US7536368B2 (en) 2003-11-26 2003-11-26 Method for problem formulation and for obtaining solutions from a database
US10/723,633 2003-11-26

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2005055000A2 true WO2005055000A2 (en) 2005-06-16
WO2005055000A3 WO2005055000A3 (en) 2006-02-09

Family

ID=34592326

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2004/039649 WO2005055000A2 (en) 2003-11-26 2004-11-24 Method for problem formulation and for obtaining solutions from a data base

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (1) US7536368B2 (en)
EP (1) EP1697857A4 (en)
JP (1) JP2007513416A (en)
KR (1) KR101171220B1 (en)
WO (1) WO2005055000A2 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8943371B2 (en) 2010-08-24 2015-01-27 Bigflo Srl Methods and systems for computer-aided identification of technical phenomena
US11373131B1 (en) * 2021-01-21 2022-06-28 Dell Products L.P. Automatically identifying and correcting erroneous process actions using artificial intelligence techniques

Families Citing this family (29)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7013308B1 (en) 2000-11-28 2006-03-14 Semscript Ltd. Knowledge storage and retrieval system and method
US9009590B2 (en) * 2001-07-31 2015-04-14 Invention Machines Corporation Semantic processor for recognition of cause-effect relations in natural language documents
US8799776B2 (en) * 2001-07-31 2014-08-05 Invention Machine Corporation Semantic processor for recognition of whole-part relations in natural language documents
US8943024B1 (en) 2003-01-17 2015-01-27 Daniel John Gardner System and method for data de-duplication
US8375008B1 (en) 2003-01-17 2013-02-12 Robert Gomes Method and system for enterprise-wide retention of digital or electronic data
US20050131874A1 (en) * 2003-12-15 2005-06-16 Mikhail Verbitsky Method and system for obtaining solutions to contradictional problems from a semantically indexed database
US7454391B2 (en) * 2004-06-22 2008-11-18 Iwint International Holdings Inc. System for problem statement reformulation
US7685118B2 (en) * 2004-08-12 2010-03-23 Iwint International Holdings Inc. Method using ontology and user query processing to solve inventor problems and user problems
US8527468B1 (en) 2005-02-08 2013-09-03 Renew Data Corp. System and method for management of retention periods for content in a computing system
US8666928B2 (en) 2005-08-01 2014-03-04 Evi Technologies Limited Knowledge repository
US7672831B2 (en) * 2005-10-24 2010-03-02 Invention Machine Corporation System and method for cross-language knowledge searching
US7805455B2 (en) * 2005-11-14 2010-09-28 Invention Machine Corporation System and method for problem analysis
US20080189273A1 (en) * 2006-06-07 2008-08-07 Digital Mandate, Llc System and method for utilizing advanced search and highlighting techniques for isolating subsets of relevant content data
US8600735B2 (en) * 2006-08-31 2013-12-03 Simon Dewulf Directed variation of identified product features using language analysis of a knowledge base
US9031947B2 (en) * 2007-03-27 2015-05-12 Invention Machine Corporation System and method for model element identification
US20080250264A1 (en) * 2007-04-03 2008-10-09 Hourselt Andrew G System for Adaptive Action Plan Compilation Based on Error Reporting
US8838659B2 (en) * 2007-10-04 2014-09-16 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Enhanced knowledge repository
US20090103916A1 (en) * 2007-10-18 2009-04-23 Csc Holdings, Inc. Optical chassis monitoring
US8615490B1 (en) 2008-01-31 2013-12-24 Renew Data Corp. Method and system for restoring information from backup storage media
US9805089B2 (en) 2009-02-10 2017-10-31 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Local business and product search system and method
KR20110134909A (en) 2009-03-13 2011-12-15 인벤션 머신 코포레이션 Question-answering system and method based on semantic labeling of text documents and user question
US20110145269A1 (en) * 2009-12-09 2011-06-16 Renew Data Corp. System and method for quickly determining a subset of irrelevant data from large data content
WO2011075610A1 (en) 2009-12-16 2011-06-23 Renew Data Corp. System and method for creating a de-duplicated data set
US9110882B2 (en) 2010-05-14 2015-08-18 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Extracting structured knowledge from unstructured text
WO2011160140A1 (en) 2010-06-18 2011-12-22 Susan Bennett System and method of semantic based searching
US9087121B2 (en) 2012-04-12 2015-07-21 International Business Machines Corporation Solving problems in data processing systems based on text analysis of historical data
WO2016063502A1 (en) * 2014-10-23 2016-04-28 日本電気株式会社 Knowledge management device, knowledge management method, and program recording medium
KR102607216B1 (en) 2016-04-01 2023-11-29 삼성전자주식회사 Method of generating a diagnosis model and apparatus generating a diagnosis model thereof
US11727020B2 (en) 2018-10-11 2023-08-15 International Business Machines Corporation Artificial intelligence based problem descriptions

Family Cites Families (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6081798A (en) * 1996-04-24 2000-06-27 International Business Machines Corp. Object oriented case-based reasoning framework mechanism
US6138122A (en) * 1998-03-02 2000-10-24 Agilent Technologies Modeling of internet services
US6167370A (en) * 1998-09-09 2000-12-26 Invention Machine Corporation Document semantic analysis/selection with knowledge creativity capability utilizing subject-action-object (SAO) structures
NZ515293A (en) * 1999-05-05 2004-04-30 West Publishing Company D Document-classification system, method and software
US20010037328A1 (en) * 2000-03-23 2001-11-01 Pustejovsky James D. Method and system for interfacing to a knowledge acquisition system
US6792418B1 (en) * 2000-03-29 2004-09-14 International Business Machines Corporation File or database manager systems based on a fractal hierarchical index structure
US20020010574A1 (en) * 2000-04-20 2002-01-24 Valery Tsourikov Natural language processing and query driven information retrieval
US20020120651A1 (en) * 2000-09-12 2002-08-29 Lingomotors, Inc. Natural language search method and system for electronic books
GB2368224B (en) * 2000-10-17 2004-08-25 Hewlett Packard Co Content provider entity for communication session
US7305345B2 (en) * 2001-02-15 2007-12-04 Livewire Acquisition, Inc. Methods, systems, and computer program products for providing automated customer service via an intelligent virtual agent that is trained using customer-agent conversations
AU2003243635A1 (en) * 2002-06-17 2003-12-31 Beingmeta, Inc. Systems and methods for processing queries
US7398261B2 (en) * 2002-11-20 2008-07-08 Radar Networks, Inc. Method and system for managing and tracking semantic objects
US7454393B2 (en) * 2003-08-06 2008-11-18 Microsoft Corporation Cost-benefit approach to automatically composing answers to questions by extracting information from large unstructured corpora
US7519604B2 (en) * 2003-08-29 2009-04-14 Nokia Corporation Troubleshooting engine and method for using same

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of EP1697857A4 *

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8943371B2 (en) 2010-08-24 2015-01-27 Bigflo Srl Methods and systems for computer-aided identification of technical phenomena
US11373131B1 (en) * 2021-01-21 2022-06-28 Dell Products L.P. Automatically identifying and correcting erroneous process actions using artificial intelligence techniques
US20220230114A1 (en) * 2021-01-21 2022-07-21 Dell Products L.P. Automatically identifying and correcting erroneous process actions using artificial intelligence techniques

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2005055000A3 (en) 2006-02-09
EP1697857A2 (en) 2006-09-06
EP1697857A4 (en) 2010-12-15
US20050114282A1 (en) 2005-05-26
KR101171220B1 (en) 2012-08-06
KR20060130597A (en) 2006-12-19
US7536368B2 (en) 2009-05-19
JP2007513416A (en) 2007-05-24

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7536368B2 (en) Method for problem formulation and for obtaining solutions from a database
US7805455B2 (en) System and method for problem analysis
US8510328B1 (en) Implementing symbolic word and synonym English language sentence processing on computers to improve user automation
US10360212B2 (en) Guided keyword-based exploration of data
US20070266019A1 (en) System for facilitating search over a network
JP2005222532A (en) Machine learning approach for determining document relevance for searching large-scale collection of electronic document
WO2005060684A2 (en) Method and system for obtaining solutions to contradictional problems from a semantically indexed database
Savage‐Knepshield et al. Interaction in information retrieval: Trends over time
CN101346716A (en) A method and system for editing text with a find and replace function leveraging derivations of the find and replace input
US20070208722A1 (en) Apparatus and method for modification of a saved database query based on a change in the meaning of a query value over time
US20070168338A1 (en) Systems and methods for acquiring analyzing mining data and information
JP2019040598A5 (en)
Tuchinda et al. Building data integration queries by demonstration
US9031947B2 (en) System and method for model element identification
EP1909170B1 (en) Method and system for automatically generating a communication interface
Bota et al. Characterizing search behavior in productivity software
US7617236B2 (en) Method and system for displaying results of a dynamic search
Wahl A minimally-intrusive approach for query-driven data integration systems
JPH11250073A (en) Method and device for retrieving semantic hierarchy of plural databases and medium for storing program therefor
JP2006513470A (en) Database access method and apparatus
JP2022546228A (en) Resolution of queries using structured and unstructured data
Jagadish et al. Organic databases
US20030028370A1 (en) System and method for providing a fixed grammar to allow a user to create a relational database without programming
Nirfarake et al. Conversion of Natural Language to SQL Query
WO2022073981A1 (en) Data extraction in industrial automation systems

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BW BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE EG ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NA NI NO NZ OM PG PH PL PT RO RU SC SD SE SG SK SL SY TJ TM TN TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VC VN YU ZA ZM ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): BW GH GM KE LS MW MZ NA SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2006541735

Country of ref document: JP

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Country of ref document: DE

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2004812213

Country of ref document: EP

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1020067012808

Country of ref document: KR

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 2004812213

Country of ref document: EP

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 1020067012808

Country of ref document: KR