WO2006073851A2 - Transistor model for simulation including dose rate events - Google Patents

Transistor model for simulation including dose rate events Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2006073851A2
WO2006073851A2 PCT/US2005/046508 US2005046508W WO2006073851A2 WO 2006073851 A2 WO2006073851 A2 WO 2006073851A2 US 2005046508 W US2005046508 W US 2005046508W WO 2006073851 A2 WO2006073851 A2 WO 2006073851A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
dose rate
subcircuit
model
transistor
source
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2005/046508
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO2006073851A3 (en
Inventor
Harry H. L. Liu
Michael S. Liu
Eric E. Vogt
Keith W. Golke
Original Assignee
Honeywell International Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Honeywell International Inc. filed Critical Honeywell International Inc.
Publication of WO2006073851A2 publication Critical patent/WO2006073851A2/en
Publication of WO2006073851A3 publication Critical patent/WO2006073851A3/en

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F30/00Computer-aided design [CAD]
    • G06F30/30Circuit design
    • G06F30/36Circuit design at the analogue level
    • G06F30/367Design verification, e.g. using simulation, simulation program with integrated circuit emphasis [SPICE], direct methods or relaxation methods

Definitions

  • the present invention relates generally to circuit modeling, and more particularly, relates to a dose fate simulation of a transistor.
  • Dose rate hardness is a reliability parameter used for determining the hardness of these integrated circuits.
  • the ability to predict the dose rate hardness of an integrated circuit is important for determining which integrated circuits are suitable for use in systems requiring continued operation during a dose rate event.
  • Dose rate hardness is typically calculated by hand. This hand calculation typically estimates total steady state photocurrent from Vdd to Vss as (dose rate) x (total collection volume). However, this method does not provide detailed nodal information (i.e., information at the nodes between Vdd and Vss). The nodal information is desirable as it can be used to provide a more complete evaluation of whether a particular device is susceptible to damage during a dose rate event.
  • an NMOS transistor having a source, a drain, a body, and a gate is modeled using a subcircuit model.
  • the subcircuit model includes a first diode having an anode connected to the body and a cathode connected to the drain.
  • the subcircuit model also includes a first current source that is connected in parallel with the first diode such that photocurrent due to a dose rate event flows through the first current source from the drain to the body.
  • the first diode and the first current source provide a model of a drain junction during a dose rate event.
  • the subcircuit model also includes a second diode having an anode connected to the body and a cathode connected to the source.
  • the subcircuit model also includes a second current source that is connected in parallel with the second diode such that the photocurrent due to a dose rate event flows through the second current source from the source to the body.
  • the second diode and the second current source provide a model of a source junction during a dose rate event.
  • a subcircuit model is used to model an NMOS transistor in which the source and the body of the NMOS transistor are connected.
  • the first diode and first current source are included in the subcircuit model, which provides a model of the drain junction during a dose rate event. Modeling the source junction in this example is unnecessary.
  • a PMOS transistor having a source, a drain, a body, and a gate is modeled using a subcircuit model.
  • the subcircuit model also includes a first diode having a cathode connected to the body and an anode connected to the source.
  • the subcircuit model also includes a first current source that is connected in parallel with the first diode such that the photocurrent due to a dose rate event flows through the first current source from the source to the body.
  • the first diode and the first current source provide a model of a source junction during a dose rate event.
  • the subcircuit model also includes a second diode having a cathode connected to the body and an anode connected to the drain.
  • the subcircuit model also includes a second current source that is connected in parallel with the second diode such that photocurrent due to a dose rate event flows through the second current source from the body to the drain.
  • the second diode and the second current source provide a model of a drain junction during a dose rate event.
  • a subcircuit model is used to model a PMOS transistor in which the source and the body of the PMOS transistor are connected.
  • the second diode and second current source are included in the subcircuit model, which provides a model of the drain junction during a dose rate event. Modeling the source junction in this example is unnecessary.
  • the strength of the diodes and the magnitude of the current sources depend on collection volume, which generally scales with transistor size and dose rate parameters.
  • the transistor size and dose rate parameters are included in the subcircuit model.
  • a dose rate event typically lasts a few tenths of nano-seconds, thus the dose rate parameters in the subcircuit model may describe a pulse-width of the current source as a few tenths of nanoseconds. The particular value of this pulse-width duration is not important so long as a steady state is achieved in the simulation.
  • the subcircuit model may be represented as a schematic or a netlist.
  • the subcircuit model replaces transistors in a circuit design. Once the transistors in the circuit design are replaced with the subcircuit model and the rest of the circuit design is properly modeled, dose rate simulation may be performed to determine the dose rate hardness of the circuit design.
  • Fig. 1 depicts a circuit diagram of a subcircuit for use in a dose rate simulation, according to one example
  • Fig. 2 depicts a circuit diagram of a subcircuit for use in a dose rate simulation, according to another example
  • Fig. 3 depicts a circuit diagram of a subcircuit for use in a dose rate simulation, according to another example
  • Fig. 4 depicts a circuit diagram of a subcircuit for use in a dose rate simulation, according to another example
  • Fig. 5 depicts a netlist of a subcircuit for use in a dose rate simulation, according to one example.
  • Fig. 6 depicts a netlist of a subcircuit for use in a dose rate simulation, according to another example.
  • Behaviors of a transistor during a dose rate event may be modeled using a circuit simulation software package.
  • SPICE is one of the most common of these circuit simulation programs; however, other circuit simulation programs may be used including a custom dedicated dose rate simulation program.
  • the dose rate simulation is performed after replacing a transistor in a circuit design with a subcircuit model.
  • the transistor may be replaced by creating a schematic-based representation of the subcircuit model or by processing an original netlist using a script.
  • a dose rate simulation may be performed.
  • the dose rate simulation provides current and voltage information at each node of the circuit.
  • the results of the simulation may be used to determine the dose rate hardness of the circuit design Model Assumptions
  • excess electron-hole pairs created in the substrate may be separated by a built-in potential in pn junctions, resulting in a photocurrent. Electrons travel from the p+ side of the junction to the n+ side of the junction, while the holes travel from the n+ side of the junction to the p+ side of the junction.
  • a metal-oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) device includes two pn junctions, one between the source and body (source junction) and one between the drain and body (drain junction). Both the source and drain junctions participate in the collection of photocurrent. Approximately 50% of the carriers are collected by the source junction, with the remaining carriers are collected by the drain junction, independent of bias conditions. As a result, both source and drain junctions are included in the dose rate models, unless the circuit design ties the source to the body.
  • the source and body of a MOSFET device are tied together.
  • carriers collected by the source junction do not contribute to the external current and only the carriers collected by the drain junction are included in the dose rate models. While only the drain junction is modeled, it is understood that the source junction is still a component of the MOSFET device. Approximately 50% of the carriers are collected by the drain junction in this scenario.
  • a circuit may contain a p-channel device and an n-channel device connected in series to form an inverter.
  • the n-channel device may be smaller than the p-channel device. Accordingly, collection volume in the n-channel device may be less than the collection volume in the p-channel device. Voltage at a node located between the p-channel device and the n-channel device may change to balance the currents from each device. As a result, the photocurrent magnitude during a dose rate event depends on the collection in the n-channel device.
  • Bipolar amplification occurs when body current multiplied by body resistance is greater than the turn-on voltage of an emitter junction.
  • the body current increases with dose rate, while the body resistance decreases with dose rate due to an increase in carrier density in the body.
  • body current multiplied by body resistance increases much slower than previously believed. It. was determined that bipolar amplification does not occur until a dose rate of 5xlO 13 Rad/s, which is greater than a maximum dose rate requirement of 1x10 Rad/s.
  • the dose rate models do not include bipolar amplification.
  • Fig. 1 shows a SPICE implementation of a subcircuit 100 for use in replacing an NMOS transistor 102 in a circuit design.
  • a source and a body of the NMOS transistor 102 are not connected.
  • Two diodes 104, 108 have been added to the NMOS transistor 102 to form the subcircuit 100.
  • a diode is a device formed from a junction of n-type and p-type semiconductor material.
  • a lead connected to the p-type material i.e., the lead connected to a side of a triangle as seen in a diode symbol
  • a lead connected to the n-type material i.e., the lead connected to a point of the triangle as seen in the diode symbol
  • the first and second diodes 104, 108 are used to model dark current behavior at a junction of the NMOS transistor 102 during a dose rate event.
  • two current sources 106, 110 have been added to the NMOS transistor 102 to form the subcircuit 100.
  • the first and second current sources 106, 110 are used to model photocurrent behavior during a dose rate event.
  • the combination of the first diode 104 and the first current source 106 provides a model of the drain junction of the NMOS transistor 102 during a dose rate event.
  • the combination of the second diode 108 and the second current source 108 provides a model of the source junction of the NMOS transistor 102 during a dose rate event.
  • the body of the NMOS transistor 102 is connected to the anode of the first diode 104 and the drain of the NMOS transistor 102 is connected to the cathode of the first diode 104.
  • the first current source 106 is connected in parallel with the first diode 104. Current flows through the first current source 106 from the drain to the body of the NMOS transistor 102. The current flowing through the first current source 106 is equal to approximately half of the photocurrent, which may be estimated by: (dose rate) x (collection volume). Collection volume may be estimated by the volume of lightly doped region associated with the NMOS transistor 102.
  • the body of the NMOS transistor 102 is connected to the anode of the second diode 108 and the source of the NMOS transistor 102 is connected to the cathode of the second diode 108.
  • the second current source 110 is connected in parallel with the second diode 108. Current flows through the second current source 110 from the source to the body of the NMOS transistor 102. The current flowing through the second current source 110 is equal to approximately half of the photocurrent.
  • Fig. 2 shows a SPICE implementation of a subcircuit 200 for use in replacing an NMOS transistor 202 in a circuit design.
  • a source and a body of the NMOS transistor 202 are connected.
  • a diode 204 and a current source 206 have been added to the NMOS transistor 202 to form the subcircuit 200.
  • the combination of the diode 204 and the current source 206 provides a model of the drain junction of the NMOS transistor 202 during a dose rate event.
  • the body of the NMOS transistor 202 is connected to the anode of the diode 204 and the drain of the NMOS transistor 202 is connected to the cathode of the diode 204.
  • the current source 206 is connected in parallel with the diode 204. Current flows through the current source 206 from the drain to the body of the NMOS transistor 202. The current flowing through the current source 206 is equal to approximately half of the photocurrent.
  • Fig. 3 shows a SPICE implementation of a subcircuit 300 for use in replacing a PMOS transistor 302 in a circuit design.
  • a source and a body of the PMOS transistor 302 are not connected.
  • Two diodes 304, 308 have been added to the PMOS transistor 302 to form the subcircuit 300.
  • the first and second diodes 304, 308 are used to model dark current behavior at a junction the PMOS transistor 302 during a dose rate event.
  • two current sources 306, 310 have been added to the PMOS transistor 302 to form the subcircuit 300.
  • the first and second current sources 306, 310 are used to model photocurrent behavior during a dose rate event.
  • the combination of the first diode 304 and the first current source 306 provides a model of the source junction the PMOS transistor 302 during a dose rate event.
  • the combination of the second diode 308 and the second current source 308 provides a model of the drain junction the PMOS transistor 302 during a dose rate event.
  • the body of the PMOS transistor 302 is connected to the cathode of the first diode 304 and the source of the PMOS transistor 302 is connected to the anode of the first diode 304.
  • the first current source 306 is connected in parallel with the first diode 304. Current flows through the first current source 306 from the source to the body of the PMOS transistor 302. The current flowing through the first current source 306 is equal to approximately half of the photocurrent.
  • the body of the PMOS transistor 302 is connected to the cathode of the second diode 308 and the drain of the PMOS transistor 302 is connected to the anode of the second diode 308.
  • the second current source 310 is connected in parallel with the second diode 308. Current flows through the second current source 310 from the body to the drain of the PMOS transistor 302. The current flowing through the second current source 310 is equal to approximately half of the photocurrent.
  • Fig. 4 shows a SPICE implementation of a subcircuit 400 for use in replacing a PMOS transistor 402 in a circuit design.
  • a source and a body of the PMOS transistor 402 are connected.
  • a diode 404 and a current source 406 have been added to the PMOS transistor 402 to form the subcircuit 400.
  • the combination of the diode 404 and the current source 406 provides a model of the drain junction the PMOS transistor 402 during a dose rate event.
  • the body of the PMOS transistor 402 is connected to the cathode of the diode 404 and the drain of the PMOS transistor 402 is connected to the anode of the diode 404.
  • the current source 406 is connected in parallel with the diode 404. Current flows through the current source 406 from the body to the drain of the PMOS transistor 402. The current flowing through the current source 406 is equal to approximately half of the photocurrent.
  • the strength of the diodes and the magnitude of the current sources depend on transistor size and dose rate event parameters, and are represented as functions of transistor size and dose rate parameters in the subcircuit model. As described previously, the photocurrent depends upon the weakest device connected in series.
  • transistor size information e.g., width and length of the transistor
  • dose rate may be incorporated into the schematic representations as properties of the subcircuit.
  • Adding properties to a device or subcircuit is a standard feature in most computer-aided design (CAD) tools. While Figs. 1-4 provide subcircuit model examples for NMOS and PMOS transistors, other devices may be modeled in a similar fashion.
  • Fig. 5 shows an example netlist 500 for an n-channel device.
  • the first line 502 defines the subcircuit, nx, as having a drain (d), gate (g), source (s), and body (b).
  • the subcircuit, nx includes two diodes (dxl and dx2), two current sources (InI and In2), and an NMOS transistor (mnl).
  • the second line 504 defines the first current source InI as being connected from the drain to the body (i.e., current flow from the drain to the body).
  • the second line 504 further describes parameters of the photocurrent based on the dose rate.
  • the third line 506 defines first diode, dxl, as being connected from the body to the drain.
  • the fourth line 508 defines the second current source In2 as being connected from the source to the body (i.e., current flow from the source to the body).
  • the fourth line 508 further describes parameters of the photocurrent based on the dose rate.
  • the fifth line 510 defines second diode, dx2, as being connected from the body to the source.
  • the sixth line 512 further describes parameters of the diodes, dxl and dx2.
  • the seventh line 514 defines the NMOS transistor, mnl.
  • the NMOS transistor, mnl includes a drain, gate, source, and body.
  • the size (i.e., width and length) of the NMOS transistor is also defined in the seventh line 514.
  • the final line 516 ends the subcircuit model, nx.
  • the function of the subcircuit model, nx is similar to the schematic subcircuit model 100 depicted in Fig. 1.
  • the parameters used in the subcircuit, nx are technology dependent and may need to be modified for other technologies.
  • Fig. 6 shows an example netlist 600 for a p-channel device.
  • the first line 602 defines the subcircuit, px, as having a drain (d), gate (g), source (s), and body (b).
  • the subcircuit, px includes two diodes (dxl and dx2), two current sources (IpI and Ip2), and a PMOS transistor (mpl).
  • the second line 604 defines the first current source IpI as being connected from the body to the drain (i.e., current flow from the body to the drain).
  • the second line 604 further describes parameters of the photocurrent based on the dose rate.
  • the third line 606 defines first diode, dxl, as being connected from the drain to the body.
  • the fourth line 608 defines the second current source Ip2 as being connected from the body to the source (i.e., current flow from the body to the source).
  • the fourth line 608 further describes parameters of the photocurrent based on the dose rate.
  • the fifth line 610 defines second diode, dx2, as being connected from the source to the body.
  • the sixth line 612 further describes parameters of the diodes, dxl and dx2.
  • the seventh line 614 defines the PMOS transistor, mpl.
  • the PMOS transistor, mpl includes a drain, gate, source, and body.
  • the size (i.e., width and length) of the PMOS transistor is also defined in the seventh line 614.
  • the final line 616 ends the subcircuit model, px.
  • the function of the subcircuit model, px is similar to the schematic subcircuit model 300 depicted in Fig. 3.
  • the parameters used in the subcircuit, px are technology dependent and may need to be modified for other technologies. Summary
  • the subcircuit models described in Figs. 1-6 can be used to replace transistors in a circuit design with a standard subcircuit call in a computer simulation. Transistor size and dose rate parameters are included in the subcircuit models.
  • This dose rate simulation method provides detailed information of current and voltage at each node in the circuit. By making the dose rate simulation a standard call in a circuit simulation software package, dose rate hardness can be easily and accurately determined.

Abstract

Behaviors of a transistor during a dose rate event can be modeled using a circuit simulation software package. A subcircuit model replaces a transistor in a circuit design to be simulate. The subcircuit model replaces a transistor in a circuit design to be simulated. The subcircuit model can be in the form of a schematic-based representation or a netlist. The subcircuit model provides a model of a source junction and a drain junction in the transistor during the dose rate event. The subcircuit model also includes the size of the transistor being replaced and the dose rate of the dose rate event. Once the transistor is replaced with the subcircuit model, a dose rate simulation may be performed to determined the dose rate hardness of the circuit design.

Description

Dose Rate Simulation
FIELD
The present invention relates generally to circuit modeling, and more particularly, relates to a dose fate simulation of a transistor.
BACKGROUND
When a nuclear bomb is detonated, intense fluxes of gamma rays, x-rays, and other high energy particles are created. When integrated circuits are exposed to this type of harsh environment, a large number of electrons and holes are generated in the silicon, causing large photocurrents to be generated. Under certain conditions, these photocurrents can lead to rail-span collapse, and burnout of metal lines, contacts, and vias. This damage to the integrated circuits can ultimately result in system failure.
Some integrated circuits are designed to continue operating during and after a nuclear bomb attack or other dose rate event, such as integrated circuits used in strategic weapons systems. Dose rate hardness is a reliability parameter used for determining the hardness of these integrated circuits. The ability to predict the dose rate hardness of an integrated circuit is important for determining which integrated circuits are suitable for use in systems requiring continued operation during a dose rate event.
Dose rate hardness is typically calculated by hand. This hand calculation typically estimates total steady state photocurrent from Vdd to Vss as (dose rate) x (total collection volume). However, this method does not provide detailed nodal information (i.e., information at the nodes between Vdd and Vss). The nodal information is desirable as it can be used to provide a more complete evaluation of whether a particular device is susceptible to damage during a dose rate event.
External testing of devices to determine dose rate hardness may also be performed. For example, Military Handbook MIL-HDBK-815, Dose-Rate Hardness Assurance Guidelines, dated 7 November 1994, and revised by Notice 1, dated 10 January 2002, describes various hardness testing methods. However, these testing methods may be expensive and result in waste (i.e., damaged devices). Therefore, it would be beneficial to simulate a circuit design exposed to a dose rate event to determine if the circuit meets the dose rate hardness requirements of a particular system.
SUMMARY
Subcircuit models for use in dose rate simulation are described. In one example, an NMOS transistor having a source, a drain, a body, and a gate is modeled using a subcircuit model. In addition to the NMOS transistor, the subcircuit model includes a first diode having an anode connected to the body and a cathode connected to the drain. The subcircuit model also includes a first current source that is connected in parallel with the first diode such that photocurrent due to a dose rate event flows through the first current source from the drain to the body. The first diode and the first current source provide a model of a drain junction during a dose rate event.
The subcircuit model also includes a second diode having an anode connected to the body and a cathode connected to the source. The subcircuit model also includes a second current source that is connected in parallel with the second diode such that the photocurrent due to a dose rate event flows through the second current source from the source to the body. The second diode and the second current source provide a model of a source junction during a dose rate event.
In another example, a subcircuit model is used to model an NMOS transistor in which the source and the body of the NMOS transistor are connected. In this example, only the first diode and first current source are included in the subcircuit model, which provides a model of the drain junction during a dose rate event. Modeling the source junction in this example is unnecessary.
In another example, a PMOS transistor having a source, a drain, a body, and a gate is modeled using a subcircuit model. In addition to the PMOS transistor, the subcircuit model also includes a first diode having a cathode connected to the body and an anode connected to the source. The subcircuit model also includes a first current source that is connected in parallel with the first diode such that the photocurrent due to a dose rate event flows through the first current source from the source to the body. The first diode and the first current source provide a model of a source junction during a dose rate event.
The subcircuit model also includes a second diode having a cathode connected to the body and an anode connected to the drain. The subcircuit model also includes a second current source that is connected in parallel with the second diode such that photocurrent due to a dose rate event flows through the second current source from the body to the drain. The second diode and the second current source provide a model of a drain junction during a dose rate event.
Li another example, a subcircuit model is used to model a PMOS transistor in which the source and the body of the PMOS transistor are connected. In this example, only the second diode and second current source are included in the subcircuit model, which provides a model of the drain junction during a dose rate event. Modeling the source junction in this example is unnecessary.
In these examples, the strength of the diodes and the magnitude of the current sources depend on collection volume, which generally scales with transistor size and dose rate parameters. Thus, the transistor size and dose rate parameters are included in the subcircuit model. A dose rate event typically lasts a few tenths of nano-seconds, thus the dose rate parameters in the subcircuit model may describe a pulse-width of the current source as a few tenths of nanoseconds. The particular value of this pulse-width duration is not important so long as a steady state is achieved in the simulation.
The subcircuit model may be represented as a schematic or a netlist. The subcircuit model replaces transistors in a circuit design. Once the transistors in the circuit design are replaced with the subcircuit model and the rest of the circuit design is properly modeled, dose rate simulation may be performed to determine the dose rate hardness of the circuit design.
These as well as other aspects and advantages will become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art by reading the following detailed description, with reference where appropriate to the accompanying drawings. Further, it is understood that this summary is merely an example and is not intended to limit the scope of the invention as claimed. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Presently preferred embodiments are described below in conjunction with the appended drawing figures, wherein like reference numerals refer to like elements in the various figures, and wherein:
Fig. 1 depicts a circuit diagram of a subcircuit for use in a dose rate simulation, according to one example;
Fig. 2 depicts a circuit diagram of a subcircuit for use in a dose rate simulation, according to another example;
Fig. 3 depicts a circuit diagram of a subcircuit for use in a dose rate simulation, according to another example;
Fig. 4 depicts a circuit diagram of a subcircuit for use in a dose rate simulation, according to another example;
Fig. 5 depicts a netlist of a subcircuit for use in a dose rate simulation, according to one example; and
Fig. 6 depicts a netlist of a subcircuit for use in a dose rate simulation, according to another example.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
Behaviors of a transistor during a dose rate event may be modeled using a circuit simulation software package. SPICE is one of the most common of these circuit simulation programs; however, other circuit simulation programs may be used including a custom dedicated dose rate simulation program. The dose rate simulation is performed after replacing a transistor in a circuit design with a subcircuit model. The transistor may be replaced by creating a schematic-based representation of the subcircuit model or by processing an original netlist using a script. Once the transistor in the circuit design is replaced with the subcircuit, a dose rate simulation may be performed. The dose rate simulation provides current and voltage information at each node of the circuit. The results of the simulation may be used to determine the dose rate hardness of the circuit design Model Assumptions
During a dose rate event, excess electron-hole pairs created in the substrate may be separated by a built-in potential in pn junctions, resulting in a photocurrent. Electrons travel from the p+ side of the junction to the n+ side of the junction, while the holes travel from the n+ side of the junction to the p+ side of the junction.
A metal-oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) device includes two pn junctions, one between the source and body (source junction) and one between the drain and body (drain junction). Both the source and drain junctions participate in the collection of photocurrent. Approximately 50% of the carriers are collected by the source junction, with the remaining carriers are collected by the drain junction, independent of bias conditions. As a result, both source and drain junctions are included in the dose rate models, unless the circuit design ties the source to the body.
In some circuit designs, the source and body of a MOSFET device are tied together. In this scenario, carriers collected by the source junction do not contribute to the external current and only the carriers collected by the drain junction are included in the dose rate models. While only the drain junction is modeled, it is understood that the source junction is still a component of the MOSFET device. Approximately 50% of the carriers are collected by the drain junction in this scenario.
When a circuit includes multiple devices connected in series, the magnitude of the photocurrent depends on the weaker device in the circuit. For example, a circuit may contain a p-channel device and an n-channel device connected in series to form an inverter. In this example, the n-channel device may be smaller than the p-channel device. Accordingly, collection volume in the n-channel device may be less than the collection volume in the p-channel device. Voltage at a node located between the p-channel device and the n-channel device may change to balance the currents from each device. As a result, the photocurrent magnitude during a dose rate event depends on the collection in the n-channel device.
Bipolar amplification occurs when body current multiplied by body resistance is greater than the turn-on voltage of an emitter junction. However, the body current increases with dose rate, while the body resistance decreases with dose rate due to an increase in carrier density in the body. As a result, body current multiplied by body resistance increases much slower than previously believed. It. was determined that bipolar amplification does not occur until a dose rate of 5xlO13 Rad/s, which is greater than a maximum dose rate requirement of 1x10 Rad/s. Thus, the dose rate models do not include bipolar amplification.
Previously it was believed that the worst case photocurrent scenario occurred during a short circuit condition (i.e., a shorted junction), which equals to Vdd/R, where R is the parasitic resistance of a Vdd and Vss network. However, it was determined that during the worst case scenario the photocurrent is actually greater due to forward biased drain junction in transistors. The subcircuit models described below take into account this understanding of the worst case scenario.
Schematic Subcircuit Models
Fig. 1 shows a SPICE implementation of a subcircuit 100 for use in replacing an NMOS transistor 102 in a circuit design. As seen in Fig. 1, a source and a body of the NMOS transistor 102 are not connected. Two diodes 104, 108 have been added to the NMOS transistor 102 to form the subcircuit 100. A diode is a device formed from a junction of n-type and p-type semiconductor material. A lead connected to the p-type material (i.e., the lead connected to a side of a triangle as seen in a diode symbol) is typically referred to as an anode, while a lead connected to the n-type material (i.e., the lead connected to a point of the triangle as seen in the diode symbol) is typically referred to as a cathode. The first and second diodes 104, 108 are used to model dark current behavior at a junction of the NMOS transistor 102 during a dose rate event.
In addition, two current sources 106, 110 have been added to the NMOS transistor 102 to form the subcircuit 100. The first and second current sources 106, 110 are used to model photocurrent behavior during a dose rate event. The combination of the first diode 104 and the first current source 106 provides a model of the drain junction of the NMOS transistor 102 during a dose rate event. The combination of the second diode 108 and the second current source 108 provides a model of the source junction of the NMOS transistor 102 during a dose rate event.
The body of the NMOS transistor 102 is connected to the anode of the first diode 104 and the drain of the NMOS transistor 102 is connected to the cathode of the first diode 104. The first current source 106 is connected in parallel with the first diode 104. Current flows through the first current source 106 from the drain to the body of the NMOS transistor 102. The current flowing through the first current source 106 is equal to approximately half of the photocurrent, which may be estimated by: (dose rate) x (collection volume). Collection volume may be estimated by the volume of lightly doped region associated with the NMOS transistor 102.
The body of the NMOS transistor 102 is connected to the anode of the second diode 108 and the source of the NMOS transistor 102 is connected to the cathode of the second diode 108. The second current source 110 is connected in parallel with the second diode 108. Current flows through the second current source 110 from the source to the body of the NMOS transistor 102. The current flowing through the second current source 110 is equal to approximately half of the photocurrent.
Fig. 2 shows a SPICE implementation of a subcircuit 200 for use in replacing an NMOS transistor 202 in a circuit design. As seen in Fig. 2, a source and a body of the NMOS transistor 202 are connected. A diode 204 and a current source 206 have been added to the NMOS transistor 202 to form the subcircuit 200. The combination of the diode 204 and the current source 206 provides a model of the drain junction of the NMOS transistor 202 during a dose rate event.
The body of the NMOS transistor 202 is connected to the anode of the diode 204 and the drain of the NMOS transistor 202 is connected to the cathode of the diode 204. The current source 206 is connected in parallel with the diode 204. Current flows through the current source 206 from the drain to the body of the NMOS transistor 202. The current flowing through the current source 206 is equal to approximately half of the photocurrent.
Fig. 3 shows a SPICE implementation of a subcircuit 300 for use in replacing a PMOS transistor 302 in a circuit design. As seen in Fig. 3, a source and a body of the PMOS transistor 302 are not connected. Two diodes 304, 308 have been added to the PMOS transistor 302 to form the subcircuit 300. The first and second diodes 304, 308 are used to model dark current behavior at a junction the PMOS transistor 302 during a dose rate event. In addition, two current sources 306, 310 have been added to the PMOS transistor 302 to form the subcircuit 300. The first and second current sources 306, 310 are used to model photocurrent behavior during a dose rate event. The combination of the first diode 304 and the first current source 306 provides a model of the source junction the PMOS transistor 302 during a dose rate event. The combination of the second diode 308 and the second current source 308 provides a model of the drain junction the PMOS transistor 302 during a dose rate event.
The body of the PMOS transistor 302 is connected to the cathode of the first diode 304 and the source of the PMOS transistor 302 is connected to the anode of the first diode 304. The first current source 306 is connected in parallel with the first diode 304. Current flows through the first current source 306 from the source to the body of the PMOS transistor 302. The current flowing through the first current source 306 is equal to approximately half of the photocurrent.
The body of the PMOS transistor 302 is connected to the cathode of the second diode 308 and the drain of the PMOS transistor 302 is connected to the anode of the second diode 308. The second current source 310 is connected in parallel with the second diode 308. Current flows through the second current source 310 from the body to the drain of the PMOS transistor 302. The current flowing through the second current source 310 is equal to approximately half of the photocurrent.
Fig. 4 shows a SPICE implementation of a subcircuit 400 for use in replacing a PMOS transistor 402 in a circuit design. As seen in Fig. 4, a source and a body of the PMOS transistor 402 are connected. A diode 404 and a current source 406 have been added to the PMOS transistor 402 to form the subcircuit 400. The combination of the diode 404 and the current source 406 provides a model of the drain junction the PMOS transistor 402 during a dose rate event.
The body of the PMOS transistor 402 is connected to the cathode of the diode 404 and the drain of the PMOS transistor 402 is connected to the anode of the diode 404. The current source 406 is connected in parallel with the diode 404. Current flows through the current source 406 from the body to the drain of the PMOS transistor 402. The current flowing through the current source 406 is equal to approximately half of the photocurrent. The strength of the diodes and the magnitude of the current sources depend on transistor size and dose rate event parameters, and are represented as functions of transistor size and dose rate parameters in the subcircuit model. As described previously, the photocurrent depends upon the weakest device connected in series.
For the schematic subcircuit models shown in Figs. 1-4, transistor size information (e.g., width and length of the transistor) and dose rate may be incorporated into the schematic representations as properties of the subcircuit. Adding properties to a device or subcircuit is a standard feature in most computer-aided design (CAD) tools. While Figs. 1-4 provide subcircuit model examples for NMOS and PMOS transistors, other devices may be modeled in a similar fashion.
Netlist Subcircuit Models
Fig. 5 shows an example netlist 500 for an n-channel device. The first line 502 defines the subcircuit, nx, as having a drain (d), gate (g), source (s), and body (b). The subcircuit, nx, includes two diodes (dxl and dx2), two current sources (InI and In2), and an NMOS transistor (mnl). The second line 504 defines the first current source InI as being connected from the drain to the body (i.e., current flow from the drain to the body). The second line 504 further describes parameters of the photocurrent based on the dose rate. The third line 506 defines first diode, dxl, as being connected from the body to the drain.
The fourth line 508 defines the second current source In2 as being connected from the source to the body (i.e., current flow from the source to the body). The fourth line 508 further describes parameters of the photocurrent based on the dose rate. The fifth line 510 defines second diode, dx2, as being connected from the body to the source. The sixth line 512 further describes parameters of the diodes, dxl and dx2.
The seventh line 514 defines the NMOS transistor, mnl. The NMOS transistor, mnl, includes a drain, gate, source, and body. The size (i.e., width and length) of the NMOS transistor is also defined in the seventh line 514. The final line 516 ends the subcircuit model, nx. The function of the subcircuit model, nx, is similar to the schematic subcircuit model 100 depicted in Fig. 1. The parameters used in the subcircuit, nx, are technology dependent and may need to be modified for other technologies. Fig. 6 shows an example netlist 600 for a p-channel device. The first line 602 defines the subcircuit, px, as having a drain (d), gate (g), source (s), and body (b). The subcircuit, px, includes two diodes (dxl and dx2), two current sources (IpI and Ip2), and a PMOS transistor (mpl). The second line 604 defines the first current source IpI as being connected from the body to the drain (i.e., current flow from the body to the drain). The second line 604 further describes parameters of the photocurrent based on the dose rate. The third line 606 defines first diode, dxl, as being connected from the drain to the body.
The fourth line 608 defines the second current source Ip2 as being connected from the body to the source (i.e., current flow from the body to the source). The fourth line 608 further describes parameters of the photocurrent based on the dose rate. The fifth line 610 defines second diode, dx2, as being connected from the source to the body. The sixth line 612 further describes parameters of the diodes, dxl and dx2.
The seventh line 614 defines the PMOS transistor, mpl. The PMOS transistor, mpl, includes a drain, gate, source, and body. The size (i.e., width and length) of the PMOS transistor is also defined in the seventh line 614. The final line 616 ends the subcircuit model, px. The function of the subcircuit model, px, is similar to the schematic subcircuit model 300 depicted in Fig. 3. The parameters used in the subcircuit, px, are technology dependent and may need to be modified for other technologies. Summary
The subcircuit models described in Figs. 1-6 can be used to replace transistors in a circuit design with a standard subcircuit call in a computer simulation. Transistor size and dose rate parameters are included in the subcircuit models. This dose rate simulation method provides detailed information of current and voltage at each node in the circuit. By making the dose rate simulation a standard call in a circuit simulation software package, dose rate hardness can be easily and accurately determined.
It should be understood that the illustrated embodiments are examples only and should not be taken as limiting the scope of the present invention. The claims should not be read as limited to the described order or elements unless stated to that effect. Therefore, all embodiments that come within the scope and spirit of the following claims and equivalents thereto are claimed as the invention.

Claims

WE1CLAIM:
1. A subcircuit model for use in dose rate simulation of a circuit design, comprising in combination: a transistor having a drain junction and a source junction; a drain junction model that models photocurrent collection at the drain junction during a dose rate event; a source junction model that models photocurrent collection at the source junction during the dose rate event; a transistor size parameter; and a dose rate parameter of the dose rate event.
2. The subcircuit model of claim 1, wherein the drain junction model includes a first diode connected in parallel with a first current source.
3. The subcircuit model of claim 1, wherein the source junction model includes a second diode connected in parallel with a second current source.
4. The subcircuit model of claim 1 , wherein the transistor is an NMOS transistor.
5. The subcircuit model of claim 1, wherein the transistor is a PMOS transistor.
6. The subcircuit model of claim 1, wherein the subcircuit model is a schematic- based representation of a circuit.
7. The subcircuit model of claim 1, wherein the subcircuit model is a netlist representation of a circuit.
PCT/US2005/046508 2005-01-05 2005-12-20 Transistor model for simulation including dose rate events WO2006073851A2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/029,308 US7322015B2 (en) 2005-01-05 2005-01-05 Simulating a dose rate event in a circuit design
US11/029,308 2005-01-05

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2006073851A2 true WO2006073851A2 (en) 2006-07-13
WO2006073851A3 WO2006073851A3 (en) 2006-09-28

Family

ID=36592903

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2005/046508 WO2006073851A2 (en) 2005-01-05 2005-12-20 Transistor model for simulation including dose rate events

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (1) US7322015B2 (en)
WO (1) WO2006073851A2 (en)

Families Citing this family (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7286393B2 (en) * 2005-03-31 2007-10-23 Honeywell International Inc. System and method for hardening MRAM bits
DE102005051417A1 (en) * 2005-10-27 2007-05-03 X-Fab Semiconductor Foundries Ag Simulation or layout method for vertical power transistors with variable channel width and variable gate-drain capacitance
US7490303B2 (en) 2006-03-03 2009-02-10 International Business Machines Corporation Identifying parasitic diode(s) in an integrated circuit physical design
US7627840B2 (en) * 2006-07-13 2009-12-01 International Business Machines Corporation Method for soft error modeling with double current pulse
US20080077376A1 (en) * 2006-09-25 2008-03-27 Iroc Technologies Apparatus and method for the determination of SEU and SET disruptions in a circuit caused by ionizing particle strikes
US9507897B2 (en) * 2014-06-14 2016-11-29 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited Circuit arrangement for modeling transistor layout characteristics
CN109522609B (en) * 2018-10-23 2019-08-16 中国人民解放军陆军防化学院 A method of the reduction nuclear accident dose rate field assessment errors based on expansion factor

Family Cites Families (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4130892A (en) * 1977-01-03 1978-12-19 Rockwell International Corporation Radiation hard memory cell and array thereof
US4225797A (en) * 1978-06-02 1980-09-30 Gte Products Corporation Pulse generator circuit triggerable by nuclear radiation
US4766482A (en) * 1986-12-09 1988-08-23 General Electric Company Semiconductor device and method of making the same
US4800299A (en) * 1986-12-18 1989-01-24 Northrop Corporation Method and apparatus for MOSFET radiation failure circumvention
US4876583A (en) * 1988-03-21 1989-10-24 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force Radiation-induced substrate photo-current compensation apparatus
US5396169A (en) 1991-03-19 1995-03-07 Lynx Golf Inc. Method for characterizing the upset response of CMOS circuits using alpha-particle sensitive test circuits
GB9115976D0 (en) * 1991-07-24 1991-11-06 Marconi Gec Ltd Protection of integrated circuit devices
US5841293A (en) * 1995-12-22 1998-11-24 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for screening integrated circuit chips for latch-up sensitivity
US5861634A (en) * 1997-06-09 1999-01-19 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd. Charge collector structure for detecting radiation induced charge during integrated circuit processing
US6269277B1 (en) * 1998-07-27 2001-07-31 The Leland Stanford Junior University Board Of Trustees System and method for designing integrated circuits
US6275080B1 (en) * 1999-07-28 2001-08-14 Bae Systems Enhanced single event upset immune latch circuit
JP3820172B2 (en) * 2002-03-26 2006-09-13 松下電器産業株式会社 Semiconductor device lifetime estimation method and reliability simulation method
US7100131B2 (en) * 2002-11-07 2006-08-29 Semiconductor Energy/Laboratory Co., Ltd. Evaluation method of semiconductor device, manufacturing method of the semiconductor device, design management system of device comprising the semiconductor device, dose amount control program for the semiconductor device, computer-readable recording medium recording the program, and dose amount control apparatus

Non-Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
POUGET V ET AL: "SPICE modeling of the transient response of irradiated MOSFETs" RADIATION AND ITS EFFECTS ON COMPONENTS AND SYSTEMS, 1999. RADECS 99. 1999 FIFTH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON 13-17 SEPT. 1999, PISCATAWAY, NJ, USA,IEEE, 13 September 1999 (1999-09-13), pages 69-74, XP010503429 ISBN: 0-7803-5726-4 *
TOR A FJELDLY ET AL: "Modeling of High-Dose-Rate Transient Ionizing Radiation Effects in Bipolar Devices" IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, IEEE SERVICE CENTER, NEW YORK, NY, US, vol. 48, no. 5, October 2001 (2001-10), XP011042174 ISSN: 0018-9499 *
YANQING DENG ET AL: "SPICE modeling of double diffused vertical power MOSFETs exposed to gamma radiation" SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE RESEARCH SYMPOSIUM, 2003 INTERNATIONAL DEC. 10-12, 2003, PISCATAWAY, NJ, USA,IEEE, 10 December 2003 (2003-12-10), pages 138-139, XP010687179 ISBN: 0-7803-8139-4 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2006073851A3 (en) 2006-09-28
US20060145086A1 (en) 2006-07-06
US7322015B2 (en) 2008-01-22

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Voldman Latchup
Alexander Transient ionizing radiation effects in devices and circuits
Duvvury et al. ESD: A pervasive reliability concern for IC technologies
WO2006073851A2 (en) Transistor model for simulation including dose rate events
Ahlbin et al. Effect of multiple-transistor charge collection on single-event transient pulse widths
Rossi et al. Multiple transient faults in logic: An issue for next generation ICs?
US6493850B2 (en) Integrated circuit design error detector for electrostatic discharge and latch-up applications
Garg Analysis and design of resilient VLSI circuits: mitigating soft errors and process variations
D'Alessio et al. Design of a nanometric CMOS memory cell for hardening to a single event with a multiple-node upset
Kauppila et al. Geometry-aware single-event enabled compact models for sub-50 nm partially depleted silicon-on-insulator technologies
US7236919B2 (en) Method for using layout regions to predict single-event effects
Kauppila et al. Single-event upset characterization across temperature and supply voltage for a 20-nm bulk planar CMOS technology
US20090230988A1 (en) Electronic device having logic circuitry and method for designing logic circuitry
Fulkerson et al. Prediction of SOI single-event effects using a simple physics-based SPICE model
EP1808893A2 (en) Protective circuit with antenna diode
Viera et al. Role of laser-induced ir drops in the occurrence of faults: Assessment and simulation
Truyen et al. Temperature effect on heavy-ion induced parasitic current on SRAM by device simulation: Effect on SEU sensitivity
Kauppila et al. Effect of negative bias temperature instability on the single event upset response of 40 nm flip-flops
Kauppila Layout-aware modeling and analysis methodologies for transient radiation effects on integrated circuit electronics
Heijmen et al. Alpha-particle-induced SER of embedded SRAMs affected by variations in process parameters and by the use of process options
Kote et al. Automated pre-placement phase as a part of robust analog-mixed signal physical design flow
Kobayashi et al. Feasibility study of a table-based SET-pulse estimation in logic cells from heavy-ion-induced transient currents measured in a single MOSFET
Phillips et al. A comprehensive understanding of the efficacy of N-ring SEE hardening methodologies in SiGe HBTs
Kirgizova et al. Simulating the response of SOS CMOS building blocks to pulsed ionizing irradiation
Sharma et al. Review of approaches for radiation hardened combinational logic in cmos silicon technology

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
NENP Non-entry into the national phase in:

Ref country code: DE

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 05857173

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A2

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 05857173

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A2