WO2007106514A2 - Automatic microparticle mark reader - Google Patents

Automatic microparticle mark reader Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2007106514A2
WO2007106514A2 PCT/US2007/006387 US2007006387W WO2007106514A2 WO 2007106514 A2 WO2007106514 A2 WO 2007106514A2 US 2007006387 W US2007006387 W US 2007006387W WO 2007106514 A2 WO2007106514 A2 WO 2007106514A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
microparticle
microparticles
automated reader
mark
code
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2007/006387
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO2007106514A3 (en
WO2007106514A9 (en
Inventor
Thomas Stierman
Dan Hunt
Chris Zdon
Paul Meyers
Steven D. Zimmermann
Christopher S. Gourley
Original Assignee
Smi Holding, Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Smi Holding, Inc. filed Critical Smi Holding, Inc.
Priority to EP07753042A priority Critical patent/EP1999873A2/en
Publication of WO2007106514A2 publication Critical patent/WO2007106514A2/en
Publication of WO2007106514A3 publication Critical patent/WO2007106514A3/en
Publication of WO2007106514A9 publication Critical patent/WO2007106514A9/en

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F11/00Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
    • G06F11/30Monitoring
    • GPHYSICS
    • G07CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07DHANDLING OF COINS OR VALUABLE PAPERS, e.g. TESTING, SORTING BY DENOMINATIONS, COUNTING, DISPENSING, CHANGING OR DEPOSITING
    • G07D7/00Testing specially adapted to determine the identity or genuineness of valuable papers or for segregating those which are unacceptable, e.g. banknotes that are alien to a currency
    • G07D7/06Testing specially adapted to determine the identity or genuineness of valuable papers or for segregating those which are unacceptable, e.g. banknotes that are alien to a currency using wave or particle radiation
    • G07D7/12Visible light, infrared or ultraviolet radiation
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F21/00Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06KGRAPHICAL DATA READING; PRESENTATION OF DATA; RECORD CARRIERS; HANDLING RECORD CARRIERS
    • G06K19/00Record carriers for use with machines and with at least a part designed to carry digital markings
    • G06K19/06Record carriers for use with machines and with at least a part designed to carry digital markings characterised by the kind of the digital marking, e.g. shape, nature, code
    • G06K19/06009Record carriers for use with machines and with at least a part designed to carry digital markings characterised by the kind of the digital marking, e.g. shape, nature, code with optically detectable marking
    • G06K19/06046Constructional details
    • G06K19/06084Constructional details the marking being based on nanoparticles or microbeads
    • GPHYSICS
    • G07CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07DHANDLING OF COINS OR VALUABLE PAPERS, e.g. TESTING, SORTING BY DENOMINATIONS, COUNTING, DISPENSING, CHANGING OR DEPOSITING
    • G07D7/00Testing specially adapted to determine the identity or genuineness of valuable papers or for segregating those which are unacceptable, e.g. banknotes that are alien to a currency
    • G07D7/20Testing patterns thereon
    • G07D7/202Testing patterns thereon using pattern matching
    • G07D7/2033Matching unique patterns, i.e. patterns that are unique to each individual paper
    • GPHYSICS
    • G09EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
    • G09FDISPLAYING; ADVERTISING; SIGNS; LABELS OR NAME-PLATES; SEALS
    • G09F3/00Labels, tag tickets, or similar identification or indication means; Seals; Postage or like stamps

Definitions

  • the present invention generally relates to articles having concealed or covert yet revealable information using marks incorporating a multiplicity of microparticles applied on or in the articles. More particularly, the present invention relates to automatic microparticle reader system, apparatus, ' and method for identifying and authenticating articles using information obtained from a mark incorporating a multiplicity of microparticles on or in articles, article packaging, or article labeling
  • microparticle marks Marks incorporating a multiplicity of microparticles
  • microparticle marks have been used in the past to combat counterfeiting, tampering, and product diversion.
  • Microparticles have been used for identifying and authenticating many types of materials and objects, including the use of microparticles directly in bulk materials (e.g., fertilizer, chemicals, paints, oils, plastics, pigments, clays, fertilizers, and explosives), the use of marks incorporating a multiplicity of microparticles on or in containers for prepackaged materials (e.g., shampoo, conditioner, lotion, motor oils, and pharmaceuticals), and the use of marks incorporating a multiplicity of microparticles on individual product units (e.g.
  • U.S. Patent Nos. 4,053,433 and 4,390,452 and GB Patent No. 1,568,699 describe multi-layered color coded particles for marking articles.
  • U.S. Patent No. 4,053,433 describes a method of marking a substance with microparticles encoded with an orderly sequence of visually distinguishable colored segments detectable with a microscope or other magnifying device.
  • the individual marking layers are applied by a printing process, by bronzing, by spray painting, or by roll coating.
  • U.S. Patent No. 4,606,927 describes microparticles encased in a transparent solid matrix obtained by hardening a liquid adhesive. While the use of multi-layered color-coded microparticles is generally known, the interrogation of marks generated with these particles has been done manually. Thus, the mark is either observed directly by an individual through magnifying optics (e.g., microscope) or an image of the mark is captured and subsequently observed by the individual. In both of these cases, the mark or image of the mark is interpreted by the individual, who then determines the microparticle code.
  • magnifying optics e.g., microscope
  • This process can suffer from being expensive, time-consuming and also presents the potential of human error in the identification of the microparticle code. As a result, the process is not practical for real time, larger volume applications, such as credit cards, passports, drivers' licenses, high-value branded products, and any tickets.
  • Automated reader systems have been developed for single expression microparticles, such as the readers for thermal or laser activated microparticle powders as described, for example, in PCT Pub. No. WO2005/104008A1. These single expression microparticle readers generally rely on both the "invisibility" of the microparticle until the microparticle is activated by the reader and the random location of the microparticles dispersed relative to a registration mark to create a unique code for the security and authentication purposes. Although such automated reader systems for identifying random patterns of single expression microparticles can be useful, the significantly higher level of complexity associated with automatically reading anything other than the presence and/or location of single expression microparticle marks has so far stymied the development of automated readers for multi-layer multi-color microparticle marks.
  • microparticles including multi-layered color-coded microparticles
  • a day will come in which counterfeiters will attempt to create two-dimensional images depicting marks incorporating a multiplicity of microparticles and place the counterfeit images on counterfeit or diverted products.
  • a human may easily distinguish such two-dimensional replica images from a genuine three-dimensional multi-layer multi-color microparticle mark when viewing a magnified presentation of the actual microparticle mark
  • two-dimensional replica images create challenges for automated readers that rely on detecting the existence and location of single expression microparticle marks or powders.
  • the present invention overcomes the deficiencies with conventional anti-counterfeiting and anti-fraud marking systems by providing an automatic reader system, apparatus, and method for the identification and authentication of articles.
  • the automatic reader system, apparatus, and method enable automatic collection and processing of mark data associated with color-coded microparticle marks, automatic determination of the code from the mark data associated with color-coded microparticle marks, and automatic retrieval of reference information associated with the code.
  • the automatic reader system, apparatus, and method of the various embodiments of present invention can be used for identifying and authenticating articles using expression codes based on signature strings generated relative to attributes of valid individual microparticles.
  • the automatic reader system, apparatus, and method of the various embodiments of present invention can be used for authenticating marks on or in articles, article packaging, or article labeling, whereby the marks are verified to have authentic, three- dimensional objects such as microparticles.
  • Fig. 1 is an image of a microparticle mark according to a first embodiment of the present invention
  • Fig. 2 is a cross-sectional view of the microparticle mark of Fig. 1;
  • Fig. 3 is a cross-sectional view of a microparticle mark according to a second embodiment depicting the structure of the microparticle mark;
  • Fig. 4 is a cross-sectional view of a microparticle mark according to a third embodiment depicting the structure of the microparticle mark
  • Fig. 5 is a cross-sectional view of a microparticle mark according to a fourth embodiment depicting the structure of the microparticle mark
  • Fig. 6 A is a cross-sectional view of a microparticle mark according to a fifth embodiment depicting the structure of the microparticle mark
  • Fig. 6B is a cross-sectional view of a microparticle mark according to a sixth embodiment depicting the structure of the microparticle mark
  • Fig. 7 is a schematic diagram of a reader apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • Fig. 8 is a block diagram of a microparticle code identification/authentication method according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • Fig. 9 is a software diagram for an automatic microparticle reader according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • Figs. 10A-D are top, rear, side, and front views, respectively, of an automatic microparticle reader according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • Figs. 1 IA-D are a top view (without light guard), top view (with light guard), side view, and two front views, respectively, of an automatic microparticle reader according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • Fig. 12 depicts an automatic microparticle reader according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • Figs. 13 and 14 are diagrams showing relationships between expression codes, signature strings, and microparticle codes.
  • Fig. 15 is an illustrative example of patterns that could be used to derive signature strings from a multiplicity of microparticles.
  • Figs 16, 17, and 18 are process diagrams that show how embodiments of the invention can be used to generate and use expression codes and signature strings.
  • This invention relates to the automation of the process for identification and/or authentication of articles using microparticle marks, which has historically been a manual process.
  • the capture, processing, searching, and reporting steps of the identification/authentication processes described below can be conducted automatically using an automatic reader apparatus.
  • the reader apparatus enables a user to place an article to be identified/authenticated in the field of view of the automatic reader.
  • the reader can manage the remainder of the process and provide the results.
  • the automatic reader system, apparatus, and method enable automatic collection and processing of mark data associated with color-coded microparticle marks, automatic determination of the code from the mark data associated with color-coded microparticle marks, and automatic retrieval of reference information associated with the code.
  • the microparticle marks are adaptable to a wide range of products, including but not limited to the use of marks incorporating a multiplicity of microparticles on containers for prepackaged materials (e.g., shampoo, conditioner, lotion, motor oils, and pharmaceuticals), and on individual product units (e.g. stereos, cameras, computers, videocassette recorders (VCRs), furniture, motorized vehicles, livestock, auto and aircraft parts, pharmaceuticals, luxury products, credit and debit cards, identification (ID) cards, compact discs (CDs) and digital video discs (DVDs), agricultural seeds, and textiles).
  • the microparticle marks can be placed on or in the product itself, the product packaging, or the product labeling so long as the microparticles are effectively frozen or locked in location as part of the microparticle mark.
  • the various embodiments of the present invention relate to a system and method for identifying and authenticating articles using codes obtained from marks incorporating one or more microparticles on or in articles, article packaging, or article labeling.
  • microparticles are any relatively * small particles comprising sizes, shapes, and other features described below. "Microparticles" as used herein is not limited to multi-layered multi-colored particles unless expressly indicated.
  • an authentic microparticle mark 10 generally comprises a carrier material 12 and microparticles 14 dispersed in the 5 carrier material and presented on a substrate 16.
  • the microparticle mark 10 generally comprises a single carrier layer 12 presented on a substrate 16, the microparticles 14 being substantially homogenously dispersed therein.
  • the substrate can comprise the article to be authenticated directly, its packaging, its labeling, etc. Alternatively,
  • the substrate may include other security divides, such as a hologram, RFID tag, a bar code, or any other identification or reference indicia adapted to be affixed to an article, for example.
  • security divides such as a hologram, RFID tag, a bar code, or any other identification or reference indicia adapted to be affixed to an article, for example.
  • an authentic microparticle mark 20 generally comprises microparticles 24 dispersed on an adhesive or coating material 22 and generally presented on a substrate 26.
  • microparticle 15 can be dispersed generally uniformly but randomly located and oriented on the carrier material 22.
  • at least some of the microparticles 24 may be intentionally located at specific positions on the carrier material 22 or the microparticles 24 may be located in a pseudorandom manner.
  • an authentic microparticle mark 30 according to a third embodiment
  • microparticles 34 dispersed directly on a substrate 36.
  • the microparticles 34 can be projected towards the substrate 36 with a low, medium, or high velocity, such that the microparticles 34 are at least partially embedded into or onto the substrate material.
  • the velocity of the projection can depend upon the relative hardness of the substrate.
  • the microparticles 34 in this third embodiment can be dispersed generally uniformly but randomly located and oriented
  • microparticles 34 may be intentionally located at specific positions on the substrate 36 or the microparticles 34 may be located in a pseudorandom manner.
  • an authentic microparticle mark 40 according to a fourth embodiment is similar to that of the microparticle mark 30 according to a third embodiment, except that the
  • microparticles 44 can be partially or fully covered with carrier material 42 to retain the microparticles 44 dispersed on the substrate 46.
  • carrier material 42 can include an adhesive, varnish or similar securing arrangement.
  • the coating material 42 may be one or more layers of film or laminate that generally secure the microparticles 44 in position relative to each other and in some embodiments the adhesive may be on the laminate of the coating material 42, on the substrate 46 or both.
  • the microparticles 44 in this fourth embodiment can be dispersed generally uniformly but randomly located and oriented in or on the substrate 46. Alternatively, at least some of the microparticles 44 may be intentionally located at specific positions on the substrate 46 or the microparticles 44 may be located in a pseudorandom manner.
  • authentic microparticle marks 50, 60 generally comprises microparticles 54, 64 dispersed in a substrate 56, 66, respectively.
  • the microparticles in the fifth and sixth embodiments can be dispersed generally uniformly and randomly throughout the thickness of the substrate 56 as depicted in Fig. 6A or within a layer of the substrate 66 as depicted in Fig. 6B.
  • the layer containing the microparticles may be sandwiched between other layers of the substrate without microparticles, or the layer may be adjacent a surface of the substrate, or there may be multiple layers.
  • at least some of the microparticles of microparticle marks 50, 60 may be intentionally located at specific positions on the substrates 56, 66 or may be located in a pseudorandom manner.
  • the microparticles can be dispersed generally uniformly but randomly located and oriented throughout the carrier material or substrate.
  • at least some of the microparticles may be intentionally located at predetermined locations and/or patterns within the carrier material or substrate. Such intentionally positioned microparticles can form a registration and/or identification pattern to be used in conjunction with the scanning of other randomly oriented microparticles as part of the microparticle mark, or can be comprise the microparticles of the microparticle mark.
  • at least some of the microparticles may be pseudo randomly positioned in the carrier material or substrate, such as preferentially doping some areas/volumes with higher concentration of microparticles than other areas/volumes.
  • the microparticles used for the microparticle marks according to the various embodiments of the present invention can comprise multi-layered color-coded microparticles.
  • multi-layered color-coded microparticles capable of expressing a first-level microparticle code are described in U.S. Patent Nos. 4,053,433, 4,390,452, 4,606,927, 6,309,690, 6,455,157, 6,647,649, 6,620,360, Great Britain Patent No. GB 1,568,699, and German Patent No. DE 19614174, all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
  • microparticles are considered capable of generating a first-level code if the microparticles mark method and system in which these microparticles are being utilized enables observation, viewing or reading of each microparticle in such a way as to express more than a binary state of that single microparticle.
  • a multi-layer, multi-color microparticle coding system having 4 particles and each having 3 layers and formulated with 12 color possibilities would be capable of expressing up to 9,834,496 unique combinations of color arrangements, each of which would represent a different code from that individual microparticle coding system.
  • the microparticles can comprise additional characteristics that are further usable in generating a expression of information.
  • additional characteristics include, for example, text or other indicia on one or more of the microparticle surfaces, reflectivity, shapes, refractive index, surface geometry or finish, dynamic crystal lattice properties (such as magneto-electrooptic properties, mechanical- electrooptic properties or thermal-electrooptic properties associated with lattice structures such as LCD or piezoelectric materials), and various optical properties including polarization.
  • the index of refraction of the microparticles and carrier material can be selected to optimize the ability to distinguish and sharpen the visual distinction between the microparticles from the carrier material when using a reader.
  • the microparticles used for the microparticle marks can comprise one or more reflective layers and/or one or more non-reflective surfaces.
  • the multi-layered color-coded microparticles can include a reflective layer at one end thereof and a non-reflective layer at the other end thereof, with one or more intermediate multi-colored layers there between.
  • the microparticles can include a reflective layer at one end thereof and a non-reflective layer at the other end thereof, with no multi-colored layers there between.
  • the reflective properties of the microparticles can be such that any reflection off of the reflective surfaces is not detectable by a naked eye, but is detectable under magnification to retain the covertness of the microparticle mark.
  • the reflective properties of the microparticles can be detectable by a naked eye or under any type of low magnification. This can be used in marks in which it is desirable to warn any potential counterfeiters that the product, packaging, or labeling contains a microparticle mark as depicted and described herein.
  • the microparticles comprising reflective surfaces can be arranged to form words, marks, or other indicia that can be detectable by a naked eye or under any type of low magnification.
  • the microparticles used for the microparticle marks can comprise one or more generally clear or lucid (transparent or translucent) layers therein.
  • the clear or lucid layers can further aid in identifying and authenticating a mark.
  • the microparticles used for the microparticle marks can comprise one or more generally dynamic crystal lattice layers or components.
  • the dynamic crystal lattice layers or components can further aid in hiding, identifying and/or authenticating a mark.
  • microparticles are about 0.1 micron to about 500 microns at their average cross section dimension, preferably about 0.1 micron to about 100 microns, and optimally in ranges of about 1 micron to about 10 microns, about 10 microns to about 20 microns, about 20 microns to about 40 microns, and about 40 microns to about 100 micrometers.
  • microparticles can depend upon the applications, for example, in printing applications it can be desirable to have microparticles of less than about 10 microns.
  • a person of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that additional ranges within the explicit ranges given above are contemplated and are within the present disclosure.
  • the microparticles can have various aspect ratios.
  • the microparticles have an aspect ratio of approximately 1 :1.
  • the microparticles may be more easily applied and randomly oriented within or on a carrier, adhesive, or coating or on a substrate. This may become important when verifying that a mark has three-dimensional objects, such as microparticles, therein, or when generating expression codes based on signature strings.
  • the microparticles have an aspect ratio of approximately 1 :2.
  • the microparticles have an aspect ratio of approximately 1:4, 1 :8, or 1:16.
  • the concentration of microparticles used to identify an object can also vary.
  • the microparticles might be incorporated directly into the article, its packaging, or its labeling at a concentration of 0.0001 to 10 parts by weight for every 100 parts by weight material, and in another embodiment at a concentration of 0.001 to 3 parts by weight for every 100 part by weight material.
  • the microparticles can be combined with an adhesive or carrier at a concentration of 0.0001 to 10 parts by weight for every 100 parts by weight material, and in another embodiment at a concentration of 0.001 to 3 parts by weight for every 100 part by weight material.
  • the overall area and volume proportions in the various cross sections of the mark can be selected to optimize the detection capability of a reader to pick up the unique characteristics of a mark. Based upon the uniqueness of the marks, the overall area and volume proportions (e.g., % volume carrier or substrate to % volume microparticles) in the various cross sections of the mark can also be selected to optimize the ability to serialize articles using the unique codes generated from the mark.
  • a mark comprises about 99.009 % area carrier or substrate to about 0.001 % area microparticles. In another embodiment, a mark comprises about 99.09 % area carrier or substrate to about 0.01 % area microparticles. In another embodiment, a mark comprises about 99.9 % area carrier or substrate to about 0.1 % area microparticles. In still another embodiment, a mark comprises about 99 % area carrier or substrate to about 1 % area microparticles.
  • the larger-sized particles can require a larger weight and proportion of microparticles for detection and determination capability. Accordingly, the smaller-sized particle can require a smaller weight and proportion of microparticles for detection and determination capability
  • a mark can have at least one microparticle and up to any number of microparticles. This number can be determined based upon the requirement for unique microparticle codes and expression codes for specific applications.
  • a mark comprises 1-10 microparticles.
  • a mark comprises 11-40 microparticles.
  • a mark comprises 41 or more microparticles, where each multiplicity of microparticles provides a first-level microparticle code and the position and/or relationship of the individual microparticles is utilized to generate one or more signatures strings as second-level codes for the microparticle mark.
  • the signature strings and microparticle codes can be used to generate a unique expression code for that microparticle mark.
  • the adhesive, carrier, or substrate material can be transparent or translucent to the frequency of light used to illuminate the microparticles, such that the microparticles are readily discemable.
  • the adhesive or carrier can include solvent materials, including both organic solvent based adhesives such as lacquers, as well as water based adhesives such as latexes, hot melt adhesives, curing systems including epoxies, polyurethanes, enamels, such as, for example, acrylic and alkyds, or a UV curing material. UV curing materials can enable application of the carrier material with microparticles in high volume applications, due to the quick curing ability.
  • An automatic reader and method enables a user to place the article to be identified/authenticated in the field of view of the automatic reader.
  • the reader can manage the remainder of the process and provides the results of the identification and/or authentication based on pre-programmed, predetermined or pre-selected control information as will be described.
  • the user may input such control information or may make adjustments to facilitate the capture of the microparticle mark, such as adjusting focus, illumination, depth of field or the like.
  • such a reader generally comprises software, a microprocessor, data storage, and a user interface.
  • the automatic reader of this invention also generally includes an illuminator for illuminating the article to be identified/authenticated, optics for magnification of the applied mark, a sensor for capturing an electronic image, and a microprocessor, software, data storage, and an interface for determining and presenting the final identification/authentication result .
  • the illumination can be obtained from a variety of illumination sources, including but not limited to incandescent lights, fluorescent lights, halogen lights, xenon lights, light-emitting diodes (LED) lamps, lasers, and other illumination sources known to those skilled in the art.
  • LED lamps are particularly advantageous, as they can provide the ability to deliver a controlled spectrum, i.e., the colors are selectable, well defined, allow tight control of wavelengths, and do not shift.
  • the lighting can be direct or fiber optics, mirrors, etc can be used to deliver the illumination from a remote source to the mark on the article.
  • the illumination is provided in a visible part of the electromagnetic frequency range. Alternatively, other portions of the electromagnetic frequency range could be utilized in accordance with the illumination of the automatic reader of the present invention.
  • the illumination system comprises a plurality of light sources, each of the light sources being independently and variably controllable by the processing system to dynamically illuminate the microparticle mark.
  • the dynamic illumination consists of high-intensity LEDs, such as white, red, blue, and green individual LEDs in combination.
  • the optics and optics path can be constructed with lenses of various shapes, configuration, and coatings to provide the necessary magnification, field of view, and depth of field. Additionally, filtering can be used to focus/highlight colors of interest (valid color layers) or to provide a customer or application specific reader. Fixed focus with control of distance between an article and the reader, or autofocusing capabilities, can be employed in the automatic reader. Although manual focusing may be used, it may not be suitable for all users because it can introduce an additional human step and therefore variability.
  • the optics path can also be designed for particular surfaces (e.g. multilevel or curved surfaces).
  • the sensor used to capture the light from the optics path can be selected from many readily available types, including, but not limited to, complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) and charged coupled device (CCD) sensors.
  • CMOS complementary metal oxide semiconductor
  • CCD charged coupled device
  • the specific sensor chosen generally is dependant upon the application (e.g. particle size being used and magnification) and is generally chosen to provide the sensitivity and resolution necessary to complete the analysis.
  • the above components mentioned can be assembled to work together to capture the information from the applied mark and generate an electronic image of the mark within an integrated, single housing, such as a handheld reader.
  • these components may be bundled or combined (e.g. currently available universal serial bus (USB) microscope provide illumination, optics, and electronic sensors) as separate elements of part of a reader system, such as for use in a production assembly line operation for initial capture of microparticle marks.
  • USB universal serial bus
  • the automated reader housing includes means for optically isolating the illumination system, the detection system and the microparticle mark from an external environment.
  • the automated reader may include a hood, for example, a foam member generally surrounding a field of view of the detection system and adapted to interface proximate a perimeter of the microparticle mark. Examples of such hoods are shown in Figs. 1 IA-E, Microparticle Code Identification and Authentication
  • FIG. 8 a block diagram of the process for an embodiment depicting multilayer multi-colored microparticle mark identification/authentication is depicted.
  • the steps for microparticle code verification/authentication broadly include (1) original setup and (2) field reading.
  • Original setup broadly includes storing data or algorithms for determining each microparticle code and optionally additional reference data associated with a microparticle code.
  • Field reading broadly includes (a) capturing information for a microparticle mark on an article in the field, (b) processing microparticle information from the microparticle mark, (c) determining the microparticle code and retrieving reference data, and (d) reporting the identification/authentication results, along with associated reference data.
  • the microparticle mark having the microparticle code can be applied to an article. While the microparticle codes associated with a given set of microparticles corresponding to an intended set of articles will generally be selected to be unique for a given manufacturer, article, distribution channel, in other embodiments the set of microparticles chosen for an intended set of articles may overlap.
  • the microparticle mark can be applied manually or automatically. Manual application methods include extruding, molding, brushing, and spraying. Automatic application methods can include the techniques just mentioned, as well as, for example, roll coating and printing. The microparticle and carrier materials are described in detail above.
  • the following field reading process can be used to determine the identity and/or authenticity of an article and the mark on the article in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention.
  • the sensor in the automatic reader apparatus is used to capture the light from the optics path and generates an electronic image of the mark. Once an electronic image of the mark has been generated, an image processing program can analyze the electronic image.
  • a priori knowledge of the marks includes the particle size, number of layers, standard color definitions, and other distinctive aspects of the marks.
  • the setup step includes the application of a priori knowledge to a specific application, and may also include the algorithms to be used. Calibration of the capture system is also part of the setup step, including settings such as depth of field, white balance, gamma, and so on.
  • the capture step includes the taking of a dataset from the sample, and may further include taking more than one frame for averaging to reduce the effects of noise.
  • the mark data refers to the total dataset readable from a mark as an image.
  • a mark may be viewed as a region on an article that contains introduced microparticles in a carrier medium, where the carrier could be an additional medium or a portion of the article itself.
  • the microparticles are fixed relative to the article in the microparticle mark, while in other embodiments the microparticle mark may be flexible.
  • the microparticles are randomly introduced into the microparticle mark, where in other embodiments the microparticles are pseudo-randomly introduced or purposefully located in the microparticle mark.
  • the raw captured data is prepared for further processing. This may include adjustments in calibration, noise reduction (such as by averaging of multiple image frames), and data transformations (such as by transforms to other color spaces or other dimensional spaces). For example, a red-green-blue (RGB) image may be mapped other color spaces, such as Lab, Luv, HSL, HSV, etc. Information such as position, height, or color space can be added to pattern-vector information to obtain a higher dimensional space which can enhance segmentation or identification.
  • RGB red-green-blue
  • the step of mark segmentation includes segmentation of microparticle marks from background data. This step reduces the amount of the computations involved in reading the mark and enhances the automatic read.
  • Many different algorithms may be used for this step, and the specific algorithm can vary depending on the application. For computational efficiency, a priori knowledge of the information readable in microparticle marks may be used.
  • the microparticles in a microparticle mark are present at low levels relative to the total dataset (because most of the data is background).
  • frequency-based segmentation algorithms are useful and a captured data may be passed through various statistical functions, to create a segmented foreground or background data. Segmentation may also be done manually (by picking the background color and removing all similar colors). Further examples include simple pixel thresholding, edge detection, transform filters (Fast Fourier Transform and inverse FFT). Watershed and neural networks may also be used.
  • the foreground bin is separated into distinct regions, with each region being an identified microparticle.
  • the foreground dataset can be converted to microparticle region of interest by identifying collections or regions of neighboring data of proper size for the microparticles of interest.
  • the step of color identification involves the determination of which identified microparticles match definitions of standard microparticle colors.
  • a transform to a desired color space may be used, if a transform was not done already.
  • Thresholding may also be used to remap the microparticle data to standard colors. Neighboring colors may affect color recognition of both layer color and background color. Hue shifting is predictable for neighboring color and growth of a color region can be accomplished by identifying additional data shifted in the direction predicted by the neighboring color.
  • each microparticle is separated into distinct regions corresponding to the color layers.
  • a segmentation algorithm based on location and color thresholds can be used.
  • the step of identifying color layers includes the ordering of color layers identified within each microparticle region. This may be done by calculating centers of each layer region, calculating the distances between centers, and using distances to determine order. Errors that may result from this step include finding two small particles in a single identified microparticle region or splitting a single layer into a plurality of layers. Such errors may be reduced by examining vectors connecting the noted centers and requiring a linear relationship between them.
  • the step of determining microparticle code can be accomplished using an algorithm to generate the code or the microparticle code can be automatically looked up in a table or database to determine the code for the microparticles identified. Additionally, reference information associated with the code may also be retrieved.
  • the electronic image will generally present a multitude of various colored pixels for each of the uniform, standard colors inco ⁇ orated in the microparticles (i.e., the pixels observed for each colored layer are not all observed to have the same RGB values).
  • ranges are established for the R, G, and B values, such that an exact match is not required.
  • a level of variability for each of the R, G, and B values for any given microparticle layer color can be assigned and any pixels falling within the specified resulting ranges can then be associated with that microparticle layer color. While this enables a much improved ability to identify each of the microparticle layers and their colors, many additional pixels can be present in the image that were part of the microparticle layers but whose color was not associated with one of the standard microparticle layer colors.
  • microparticle layer colors can be shifted from their standard colors. This can occur because of being illuminated by light reflected or scattered off of a colored substrate. As a result, some of the illumination reaching the microparticle is no longer of the same spectrum as the light source, but now has been "colored" by reflection or scattering off of the substrate.
  • light of some wavelengths can be selectively absorbed by the substrate while other wavelengths are not.
  • the resulting light scattered and reflected, with its different spectrum, can then light the microparticles and contribute to a color shift of the microparticles or can reach the sensor and change the color signature for pixels associated with a microparticle.
  • These color-shifting effects can be corrected for by adjusting the expected R, G, and B values for each of the standard microparticle layer colors for predicted values that can be expected due to the "shifted" illumination spectrum.
  • the expected R, G, and B values for each of the standard microparticle layer colors can also be corrected for the spectrum of the light source used to illuminate the mark.
  • the corrections made for determining a match -- due to the spectrum of the light source ⁇ can be made for all pixels in the image, the corrections needed due to background scattering may generally need only take into account the color of the background in the surrounding area of the microparticle (i.e., the color of the substrate in the areas scattering light onto the microparticle).
  • an anti-counterfeiting setting if there is no valid three- dimensional microparticles identified of a valid unique code or match with reference data, depending upon what embodiments of the invention have been utilized, then the mark might be or is likely a counterfeit and the process can be stopped and it can be reported that the mark and/or product is not authenticated. If there is a match for the mark, the matching code can be reported. If it is ' desired to go a next level of security, the following steps relating to microparticle mark signature authentication can be used to authenticate mark's signature code based upon the signature characteristics of the microparticle mark. This step can represent a next- level of protection against counterfeiting.
  • an anti-product diversion setting if there is a match for the mark, the matching code can be reported and the source and/or distribution chain of the product and mark can be identified. If it is desired to go a next level of security, the following steps relating to microparticle mark signature identification can be used to identify mark's signature code based upon the signature characteristics of the microparticle mark. This step can represent a next-level of protection against product diversion.
  • a microparticle mark signature code can be used to provide identification and/or authentication through comparison of a calculated alphanumeric string representing the signature to a database of existing original alphanumeric strings rather than through manual comparisons of raw images directly as described in U.S. Patent No. 6,309,690. This process can therefore greatly minimize the amount of storage needed to save information about products and marks and also speed up the process by comparing alphanumeric strings rather than digital or analog images. Reader Device
  • a microparticle reader 110 may be configured as shown in Figs. 10A- D, 11A-E, and 12.
  • Figs. 10A-D depict a display 111, lens assembly 112, and a main circuit board 113 connected to display 111.
  • Six buttons 114A are connected to button-circuit board 114B.
  • a USB plug 115 is mounted on the main circuit board.
  • a rear spring battery contact 1 16 is connected to main circuit board 113, as is front battery 117 and lens assembly plug connector 118 and rear battery 119.
  • the unit's housing 120 is designed to make the reader portable by hand.
  • an annular projection 121 may be fitted to lens assembly 112 for receiving a hood 122.
  • Hood 122 may be adjustable so that both a restricted and non-restricted aperture is presented. Adjustments in hood
  • 122 may be made depending on the amount of ambient light available when the microparticle reader is put into operation.
  • the display 111 can display an enhanced image of a microparticle mark, such as the mark shown in Fig. 2.
  • a user interface is provided by buttons 114A.
  • Housing 110 is sized so that device 110 is relatively easy to carry by hand. Relationship between microparticle code, signature strings, and expression code
  • microparticle codes 300 The hierarchical relationship between microparticle codes 300, signature strings 302, and expression codes 304 can be illustrated as shown in Fig. 13.
  • the numeric abundance of unique combinations of microparticle codes, signature strings and expression codes is illustrated in Fig. 14. If the number of microparticle codes 300 is, for example, on the order of I On, then the number of signature strings 302 would be exponentially larger n x> while the number of expression codes would be further exponentially larger n ⁇ x 2 .
  • Figure 15 shows how the relationships between individual microparticles 202 can be used to derive signature strings.
  • centroid of each microparticle 202, 204 as a reference, the generally rectangular shape defined by lines A, B, C, and D can be formed.
  • centroids joined by lines alpha, beta, and gamma forms a triangle shape between three microparticles 202.
  • Another triangle shape can be formed from the centroids of microparticles 202, 204 using lines a, b, and c. These patterns are illustrative only, since the relative position of microparticles 202, 204 can be used to generate a very large number of possible patterns that can be used as signature strings. Microparticle 204 is shown to illustrate that not all microparticles used need have the same or even similar attributes. Overall System Examples
  • Figure 16 is a block diagram of a process for authenticating a mark 500.
  • Reader 502 captures an image 504 of mark 500.
  • Image 504 includes microparticle code 506 and signature strings 508.
  • Database 510 stores preselected microparticle codes, for example BRG for the color sequence Blue, Red, and Green that represents a valid microparticle code.
  • Database 512 stores preselected signature strings, for example the signature strings 1, 2, and 3.
  • Database 514 stores a predetermined coding order, for example, first the code for colors BRG, then the signature strings 1 and 2.
  • an expression code results.
  • the expression code could be any of BRG 12, BRG 13, or 31 BRG, in this example.
  • An initial generation of expression codes may be used to generate a database of expression codes 518 to compare with expression code 516.
  • First-time expression codes 518 may be identified, for example, with codes 520A, B, and C. In this example, these codes may be BRG 12, BRG 13, and 31 BRG, respectively, depending on the possible alternative combinations of predetermined coding order 514 and/or preselected signature strings 512. Codes 520A, B, and C are part of initial expression code generation 522. These codes are then used to populate expression code database 524.
  • Fig. 17 shows an embodiment of the process in Fig. A with a "challenge” process added to test the reliability of the system.
  • An absolute-position database 600 is generated from mark 500.
  • challenge test 602 From the absolute-position data, challenge test 602 generates a database of challenge strings 604.
  • Challenge strings 604 are communicated to the preselected signature-database 512 and used to generate signature strings 508 from image data 504.
  • the resulting expression code 516 is then compared to challenge test 602. Because challenge strings 604 are generated from absolute-position data from mark 500, each of expression codes 516 produced by signature strings 508 based on image data 504 should be recognized as authentic by challenge test 602. Further, this embodiment depicts the determination of the microparticle code using an algorithm 606 rather than a database.
  • Fig. 18 shows an embodiment of an authentication process that relies only on signature strings to generate expression codes.
  • Image data 504 from mark 500 is captured by reader 502.
  • Microparticles in image data 504 are authenticated as expected microparticles by microparticle validation 700, in part by reference to database 702 of preselected valid microparticles.
  • signature strings 508 are identified.
  • These signature strings 508 then produce an expression code or signature-string code 704, which may include only signature strings, or may include other code elements.
  • a first-time expression code or signature-string code 706 may be generated.
  • Exemplary signature-string codes are shown at 708A, B, and C, for example 12, 13, and 31.
  • These expression codes or signature-string codes 706 are used to generate initial expression codes or signature-string codes 710, which then are used to populate database 712, which stores expression codes or signature-string codes.
  • Exemplary signature-string codes may include, for example, 12, 13, 31, or 123.

Abstract

An automatic reader system, apparatus, and method for the identification and authentication of articles enabling automatic collection and processing of code data associated with microparticle marks, automatic determination of the code from the code data associated with microparticle marks, and automatic retrieval of reference information associated with the code.

Description

AUTOMATIC MICROPARTICLE MARK READER
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention generally relates to articles having concealed or covert yet revealable information using marks incorporating a multiplicity of microparticles applied on or in the articles. More particularly, the present invention relates to automatic microparticle reader system, apparatus, ' and method for identifying and authenticating articles using information obtained from a mark incorporating a multiplicity of microparticles on or in articles, article packaging, or article labeling
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Counterfeiting, tampering, and product diversion account for nearly a half-trillion dollars in worldwide business losses every year. While these business losses are staggering, public trust is also declining as a result of these problems. News stories documenting problems such as black market fraud, theft, gray market goods, and product tampering contribute to the dwindling public trust in the authenticity of goods and services.
Marks incorporating a multiplicity of microparticles ("microparticle marks") have been used in the past to combat counterfeiting, tampering, and product diversion. Microparticles have been used for identifying and authenticating many types of materials and objects, including the use of microparticles directly in bulk materials (e.g., fertilizer, chemicals, paints, oils, plastics, pigments, clays, fertilizers, and explosives), the use of marks incorporating a multiplicity of microparticles on or in containers for prepackaged materials (e.g., shampoo, conditioner, lotion, motor oils, and pharmaceuticals), and the use of marks incorporating a multiplicity of microparticles on individual product units (e.g. stereos, cameras, computers, videocassette recorders (VCRs), furniture, motorized vehicles, and livestock). Since the late 1970's, multi-layered color-coded microparticles specifically have been used to covertly mark materials and objects. U.S. Patent Nos. 4,053,433 and 4,390,452 and GB Patent No. 1,568,699 describe multi-layered color coded particles for marking articles. Specifically, U.S. Patent No. 4,053,433 describes a method of marking a substance with microparticles encoded with an orderly sequence of visually distinguishable colored segments detectable with a microscope or other magnifying device. GB Patent No. 1,568,699 describes systems for making microparticles of layered colored material, which have generally parallel flat surfaces with irregular broken edges there between, enabling visualization of the code. Other examples of multi- layered color-coded microparticles are described in U.S. Patent Nos. 6,647,649 and 6,455,157, wherein each describes methods for generating unique codes from sets of multi-layered color-coded microparticles. Additional types of microparticles are described in DE Patent No. 19,614,174 and U.S. Patent No. 4,606,927. DE Patent No. 19,614,174 describes a process for producing multi-layered microparticles by forming a laminate sheet of colored layers and crushing the sheet. The individual marking layers are applied by a printing process, by bronzing, by spray painting, or by roll coating. U.S. Patent No. 4,606,927 describes microparticles encased in a transparent solid matrix obtained by hardening a liquid adhesive. While the use of multi-layered color-coded microparticles is generally known, the interrogation of marks generated with these particles has been done manually. Thus, the mark is either observed directly by an individual through magnifying optics (e.g., microscope) or an image of the mark is captured and subsequently observed by the individual. In both of these cases, the mark or image of the mark is interpreted by the individual, who then determines the microparticle code. This process can suffer from being expensive, time-consuming and also presents the potential of human error in the identification of the microparticle code. As a result, the process is not practical for real time, larger volume applications, such as credit cards, passports, drivers' licenses, high-value branded products, and any tickets.
Automated reader systems have been developed for single expression microparticles, such as the readers for thermal or laser activated microparticle powders as described, for example, in PCT Pub. No. WO2005/104008A1. These single expression microparticle readers generally rely on both the "invisibility" of the microparticle until the microparticle is activated by the reader and the random location of the microparticles dispersed relative to a registration mark to create a unique code for the security and authentication purposes. Although such automated reader systems for identifying random patterns of single expression microparticles can be useful, the significantly higher level of complexity associated with automatically reading anything other than the presence and/or location of single expression microparticle marks has so far stymied the development of automated readers for multi-layer multi-color microparticle marks. While the microparticles, including multi-layered color-coded microparticles, can represent a level of security that is generally useful in protecting against counterfeiting, tampering, and product diversion, it can be anticipated that a day will come in which counterfeiters will attempt to create two-dimensional images depicting marks incorporating a multiplicity of microparticles and place the counterfeit images on counterfeit or diverted products. Although a human may easily distinguish such two-dimensional replica images from a genuine three-dimensional multi-layer multi-color microparticle mark when viewing a magnified presentation of the actual microparticle mark, two-dimensional replica images create challenges for automated readers that rely on detecting the existence and location of single expression microparticle marks or powders.
There is therefore a need for an automatic microparticle reader system, apparatus, and method that can overcome the inherent deficiencies with conventional marking systems and methods.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention overcomes the deficiencies with conventional anti-counterfeiting and anti-fraud marking systems by providing an automatic reader system, apparatus, and method for the identification and authentication of articles. The automatic reader system, apparatus, and method enable automatic collection and processing of mark data associated with color-coded microparticle marks, automatic determination of the code from the mark data associated with color-coded microparticle marks, and automatic retrieval of reference information associated with the code.
In another embodiment, the automatic reader system, apparatus, and method of the various embodiments of present invention can be used for identifying and authenticating articles using expression codes based on signature strings generated relative to attributes of valid individual microparticles.
In a further embodiment, the automatic reader system, apparatus, and method of the various embodiments of present invention can be used for authenticating marks on or in articles, article packaging, or article labeling, whereby the marks are verified to have authentic, three- dimensional objects such as microparticles.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The invention may be more completely understood in consideration of the following detailed description of various embodiments of the invention in connection with the accompanying drawings, in which:
Fig. 1 is an image of a microparticle mark according to a first embodiment of the present invention; Fig. 2 is a cross-sectional view of the microparticle mark of Fig. 1;
Fig. 3 is a cross-sectional view of a microparticle mark according to a second embodiment depicting the structure of the microparticle mark;
Fig. 4 is a cross-sectional view of a microparticle mark according to a third embodiment depicting the structure of the microparticle mark;
Fig. 5 is a cross-sectional view of a microparticle mark according to a fourth embodiment depicting the structure of the microparticle mark;
Fig. 6 A is a cross-sectional view of a microparticle mark according to a fifth embodiment depicting the structure of the microparticle mark; Fig. 6B is a cross-sectional view of a microparticle mark according to a sixth embodiment depicting the structure of the microparticle mark;
Fig. 7 is a schematic diagram of a reader apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention;
Fig. 8 is a block diagram of a microparticle code identification/authentication method according to an embodiment of the present invention;
Fig. 9 is a software diagram for an automatic microparticle reader according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Figs. 10A-D are top, rear, side, and front views, respectively, of an automatic microparticle reader according to an embodiment of the present invention. Figs. 1 IA-D are a top view (without light guard), top view (with light guard), side view, and two front views, respectively, of an automatic microparticle reader according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Fig. 12 depicts an automatic microparticle reader according to an embodiment of the present invention. Figs. 13 and 14 are diagrams showing relationships between expression codes, signature strings, and microparticle codes.
Fig. 15 is an illustrative example of patterns that could be used to derive signature strings from a multiplicity of microparticles.
Figs 16, 17, and 18 are process diagrams that show how embodiments of the invention can be used to generate and use expression codes and signature strings.
While the invention is amenable to various modifications and alternative forms, specifics thereof have been shown by way of example in the drawings and will be described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the intention is not to limit the invention to the particular embodiments described. On the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS This invention relates to the automation of the process for identification and/or authentication of articles using microparticle marks, which has historically been a manual process. The capture, processing, searching, and reporting steps of the identification/authentication processes described below can be conducted automatically using an automatic reader apparatus. The reader apparatus enables a user to place an article to be identified/authenticated in the field of view of the automatic reader. In one embodiment, the reader can manage the remainder of the process and provide the results. The automatic reader system, apparatus, and method enable automatic collection and processing of mark data associated with color-coded microparticle marks, automatic determination of the code from the mark data associated with color-coded microparticle marks, and automatic retrieval of reference information associated with the code.
The microparticle marks are adaptable to a wide range of products, including but not limited to the use of marks incorporating a multiplicity of microparticles on containers for prepackaged materials (e.g., shampoo, conditioner, lotion, motor oils, and pharmaceuticals), and on individual product units (e.g. stereos, cameras, computers, videocassette recorders (VCRs), furniture, motorized vehicles, livestock, auto and aircraft parts, pharmaceuticals, luxury products, credit and debit cards, identification (ID) cards, compact discs (CDs) and digital video discs (DVDs), agricultural seeds, and textiles). The microparticle marks can be placed on or in the product itself, the product packaging, or the product labeling so long as the microparticles are effectively frozen or locked in location as part of the microparticle mark.
Microparticle Mark Structure
As described herein, the various embodiments of the present invention relate to a system and method for identifying and authenticating articles using codes obtained from marks incorporating one or more microparticles on or in articles, article packaging, or article labeling.
Except where as noted, for purposes of the present invention, microparticles are any relatively * small particles comprising sizes, shapes, and other features described below. "Microparticles" as used herein is not limited to multi-layered multi-colored particles unless expressly indicated.
Referring to Figs. 1 and 2, an authentic microparticle mark 10 according to a first embodiment generally comprises a carrier material 12 and microparticles 14 dispersed in the 5 carrier material and presented on a substrate 16.
The microparticle mark 10 according to this first embodiment generally comprises a single carrier layer 12 presented on a substrate 16, the microparticles 14 being substantially homogenously dispersed therein. In the various embodiments described herein, the substrate can comprise the article to be authenticated directly, its packaging, its labeling, etc. Alternatively,
10 the substrate may include other security divides, such as a hologram, RFID tag, a bar code, or any other identification or reference indicia adapted to be affixed to an article, for example.
Referring to Fig. 3, an authentic microparticle mark 20 according to a second embodiment generally comprises microparticles 24 dispersed on an adhesive or coating material 22 and generally presented on a substrate 26. The microparticles 24 in this second embodiment
15 can be dispersed generally uniformly but randomly located and oriented on the carrier material 22. Alternatively, at least some of the microparticles 24 may be intentionally located at specific positions on the carrier material 22 or the microparticles 24 may be located in a pseudorandom manner.
Referring to Fig. 4, an authentic microparticle mark 30 according to a third embodiment
20 generally comprises microparticles 34 dispersed directly on a substrate 36. The microparticles 34 can be projected towards the substrate 36 with a low, medium, or high velocity, such that the microparticles 34 are at least partially embedded into or onto the substrate material. The velocity of the projection can depend upon the relative hardness of the substrate. The microparticles 34 in this third embodiment can be dispersed generally uniformly but randomly located and oriented
25 in or on the substrate 36. Alternatively, at least some of the microparticles 34 may be intentionally located at specific positions on the substrate 36 or the microparticles 34 may be located in a pseudorandom manner.
Referring to Fig. 5, an authentic microparticle mark 40 according to a fourth embodiment is similar to that of the microparticle mark 30 according to a third embodiment, except that the
30 microparticles 44 can be partially or fully covered with carrier material 42 to retain the microparticles 44 dispersed on the substrate 46. Such a carrier material 42 can include an adhesive, varnish or similar securing arrangement. In another embodiment, the coating material 42 may be one or more layers of film or laminate that generally secure the microparticles 44 in position relative to each other and in some embodiments the adhesive may be on the laminate of the coating material 42, on the substrate 46 or both. The microparticles 44 in this fourth embodiment can be dispersed generally uniformly but randomly located and oriented in or on the substrate 46. Alternatively, at least some of the microparticles 44 may be intentionally located at specific positions on the substrate 46 or the microparticles 44 may be located in a pseudorandom manner.
Referring to Figs. 6A and 6B, authentic microparticle marks 50, 60 according to fifth and sixth embodiments generally comprises microparticles 54, 64 dispersed in a substrate 56, 66, respectively. In one embodiment, the microparticles in the fifth and sixth embodiments can be dispersed generally uniformly and randomly throughout the thickness of the substrate 56 as depicted in Fig. 6A or within a layer of the substrate 66 as depicted in Fig. 6B. It will be understood that the layer containing the microparticles may be sandwiched between other layers of the substrate without microparticles, or the layer may be adjacent a surface of the substrate, or there may be multiple layers. Alternatively, at least some of the microparticles of microparticle marks 50, 60 may be intentionally located at specific positions on the substrates 56, 66 or may be located in a pseudorandom manner.
In any of the embodiments described above, the microparticles can be dispersed generally uniformly but randomly located and oriented throughout the carrier material or substrate. Alternatively, in other embodiments at least some of the microparticles may be intentionally located at predetermined locations and/or patterns within the carrier material or substrate. Such intentionally positioned microparticles can form a registration and/or identification pattern to be used in conjunction with the scanning of other randomly oriented microparticles as part of the microparticle mark, or can be comprise the microparticles of the microparticle mark. In still other embodiments, at least some of the microparticles may be pseudo randomly positioned in the carrier material or substrate, such as preferentially doping some areas/volumes with higher concentration of microparticles than other areas/volumes.
While not limited to such, the microparticles used for the microparticle marks according to the various embodiments of the present invention can comprise multi-layered color-coded microparticles. Examples of such multi-layered color-coded microparticles capable of expressing a first-level microparticle code are described in U.S. Patent Nos. 4,053,433, 4,390,452, 4,606,927, 6,309,690, 6,455,157, 6,647,649, 6,620,360, Great Britain Patent No. GB 1,568,699, and German Patent No. DE 19614174, all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. It will be understood that for purposes of the present invention, existing microparticles are considered capable of generating a first-level code if the microparticles mark method and system in which these microparticles are being utilized enables observation, viewing or reading of each microparticle in such a way as to express more than a binary state of that single microparticle. For example, a multi-layer, multi-color microparticle coding system having 4 particles and each having 3 layers and formulated with 12 color possibilities would be capable of expressing up to 9,834,496 unique combinations of color arrangements, each of which would represent a different code from that individual microparticle coding system.
In addition to comprising a multi-layer color-coded structure, the microparticles can comprise additional characteristics that are further usable in generating a expression of information. Such additional characteristics include, for example, text or other indicia on one or more of the microparticle surfaces, reflectivity, shapes, refractive index, surface geometry or finish, dynamic crystal lattice properties (such as magneto-electrooptic properties, mechanical- electrooptic properties or thermal-electrooptic properties associated with lattice structures such as LCD or piezoelectric materials), and various optical properties including polarization. For example, the index of refraction of the microparticles and carrier material can be selected to optimize the ability to distinguish and sharpen the visual distinction between the microparticles from the carrier material when using a reader.
In embodiments comprising multi-layered color-coded microparticles or in other embodiments, the microparticles used for the microparticle marks can comprise one or more reflective layers and/or one or more non-reflective surfaces. For example, the multi-layered color-coded microparticles can include a reflective layer at one end thereof and a non-reflective layer at the other end thereof, with one or more intermediate multi-colored layers there between. In other embodiments, the microparticles can include a reflective layer at one end thereof and a non-reflective layer at the other end thereof, with no multi-colored layers there between.
In the embodiments in which the microparticles comprise reflective surfaces, the reflective properties of the microparticles can be such that any reflection off of the reflective surfaces is not detectable by a naked eye, but is detectable under magnification to retain the covertness of the microparticle mark. In other embodiments, the reflective properties of the microparticles can be detectable by a naked eye or under any type of low magnification. This can be used in marks in which it is desirable to warn any potential counterfeiters that the product, packaging, or labeling contains a microparticle mark as depicted and described herein. In these embodiments, the microparticles comprising reflective surfaces can be arranged to form words, marks, or other indicia that can be detectable by a naked eye or under any type of low magnification.
In further embodiments, the microparticles used for the microparticle marks can comprise one or more generally clear or lucid (transparent or translucent) layers therein. The clear or lucid layers can further aid in identifying and authenticating a mark.
In other embodiments, the microparticles used for the microparticle marks can comprise one or more generally dynamic crystal lattice layers or components. The dynamic crystal lattice layers or components can further aid in hiding, identifying and/or authenticating a mark.
For many applications, microparticles are about 0.1 micron to about 500 microns at their average cross section dimension, preferably about 0.1 micron to about 100 microns, and optimally in ranges of about 1 micron to about 10 microns, about 10 microns to about 20 microns, about 20 microns to about 40 microns, and about 40 microns to about 100 micrometers.
The size of the microparticles can depend upon the applications, for example, in printing applications it can be desirable to have microparticles of less than about 10 microns. A person of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that additional ranges within the explicit ranges given above are contemplated and are within the present disclosure.
The microparticles can have various aspect ratios. In an embodiment, the microparticles have an aspect ratio of approximately 1 :1. By having such an aspect ratio, the microparticles may be more easily applied and randomly oriented within or on a carrier, adhesive, or coating or on a substrate. This may become important when verifying that a mark has three-dimensional objects, such as microparticles, therein, or when generating expression codes based on signature strings. In other embodiments, the microparticles have an aspect ratio of approximately 1 :2. In further embodiments, the microparticles have an aspect ratio of approximately 1:4, 1 :8, or 1:16.
A person of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that additional aspect ratios within the explicit aspect ratios given above are contemplated and are within the present disclosure.
The concentration of microparticles used to identify an object can also vary. For example, the microparticles might be incorporated directly into the article, its packaging, or its labeling at a concentration of 0.0001 to 10 parts by weight for every 100 parts by weight material, and in another embodiment at a concentration of 0.001 to 3 parts by weight for every 100 part by weight material. Alternatively, the microparticles can be combined with an adhesive or carrier at a concentration of 0.0001 to 10 parts by weight for every 100 parts by weight material, and in another embodiment at a concentration of 0.001 to 3 parts by weight for every 100 part by weight material. A person of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that additional ranges within the explicit ranges given above are contemplated and are within the present disclosure.
The overall area and volume proportions in the various cross sections of the mark (e.g., % area carrier or substrate to % area microparticles) can be selected to optimize the detection capability of a reader to pick up the unique characteristics of a mark. Based upon the uniqueness of the marks, the overall area and volume proportions (e.g., % volume carrier or substrate to % volume microparticles) in the various cross sections of the mark can also be selected to optimize the ability to serialize articles using the unique codes generated from the mark.
In an embodiment, a mark comprises about 99.009 % area carrier or substrate to about 0.001 % area microparticles. In another embodiment, a mark comprises about 99.09 % area carrier or substrate to about 0.01 % area microparticles. In another embodiment, a mark comprises about 99.9 % area carrier or substrate to about 0.1 % area microparticles. In still another embodiment, a mark comprises about 99 % area carrier or substrate to about 1 % area microparticles. These levels can enable optimization of the detection capability of a reader to pick up the unique characteristics of a mark and the ability to serialize articles using the expression codes generated from the mark, but also can cut down on microparticle costs. A person of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that additional area ratios within the explicit area ratios given above are contemplated and are within the present disclosure.
In general, the larger-sized particles can require a larger weight and proportion of microparticles for detection and determination capability. Accordingly, the smaller-sized particle can require a smaller weight and proportion of microparticles for detection and determination capability
In terms of quantifying the number of microparticles within a mark, a mark can have at least one microparticle and up to any number of microparticles. This number can be determined based upon the requirement for unique microparticle codes and expression codes for specific applications. In an embodiment, a mark comprises 1-10 microparticles. In another embodiment, a mark comprises 11-40 microparticles. In another example embodiment, a mark comprises 41 or more microparticles, where each multiplicity of microparticles provides a first-level microparticle code and the position and/or relationship of the individual microparticles is utilized to generate one or more signatures strings as second-level codes for the microparticle mark. In one embodiment, the signature strings and microparticle codes can be used to generate a unique expression code for that microparticle mark. In one embodiment, the adhesive, carrier, or substrate material can be transparent or translucent to the frequency of light used to illuminate the microparticles, such that the microparticles are readily discemable. The adhesive or carrier can include solvent materials, including both organic solvent based adhesives such as lacquers, as well as water based adhesives such as latexes, hot melt adhesives, curing systems including epoxies, polyurethanes, enamels, such as, for example, acrylic and alkyds, or a UV curing material. UV curing materials can enable application of the carrier material with microparticles in high volume applications, due to the quick curing ability.
Automatic Reader
An automatic reader and method according to the various embodiments of the present invention enables a user to place the article to be identified/authenticated in the field of view of the automatic reader. In one embodiment, the reader can manage the remainder of the process and provides the results of the identification and/or authentication based on pre-programmed, predetermined or pre-selected control information as will be described. In an alternate embodiment, the user may input such control information or may make adjustments to facilitate the capture of the microparticle mark, such as adjusting focus, illumination, depth of field or the like.
Referring to Fig. 7, such a reader generally comprises software, a microprocessor, data storage, and a user interface. The automatic reader of this invention also generally includes an illuminator for illuminating the article to be identified/authenticated, optics for magnification of the applied mark, a sensor for capturing an electronic image, and a microprocessor, software, data storage, and an interface for determining and presenting the final identification/authentication result . The illumination can be obtained from a variety of illumination sources, including but not limited to incandescent lights, fluorescent lights, halogen lights, xenon lights, light-emitting diodes (LED) lamps, lasers, and other illumination sources known to those skilled in the art. LED lamps are particularly advantageous, as they can provide the ability to deliver a controlled spectrum, i.e., the colors are selectable, well defined, allow tight control of wavelengths, and do not shift. The lighting can be direct or fiber optics, mirrors, etc can be used to deliver the illumination from a remote source to the mark on the article. Preferably, the illumination is provided in a visible part of the electromagnetic frequency range. Alternatively, other portions of the electromagnetic frequency range could be utilized in accordance with the illumination of the automatic reader of the present invention.
In one embodiment, the illumination system comprises a plurality of light sources, each of the light sources being independently and variably controllable by the processing system to dynamically illuminate the microparticle mark. In one aspect of this embodiment, the dynamic illumination consists of high-intensity LEDs, such as white, red, blue, and green individual LEDs in combination.
The optics and optics path can be constructed with lenses of various shapes, configuration, and coatings to provide the necessary magnification, field of view, and depth of field. Additionally, filtering can be used to focus/highlight colors of interest (valid color layers) or to provide a customer or application specific reader. Fixed focus with control of distance between an article and the reader, or autofocusing capabilities, can be employed in the automatic reader. Although manual focusing may be used, it may not be suitable for all users because it can introduce an additional human step and therefore variability. The optics path can also be designed for particular surfaces (e.g. multilevel or curved surfaces).
The sensor used to capture the light from the optics path can be selected from many readily available types, including, but not limited to, complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) and charged coupled device (CCD) sensors. The specific sensor chosen generally is dependant upon the application (e.g. particle size being used and magnification) and is generally chosen to provide the sensitivity and resolution necessary to complete the analysis.
The above components mentioned can be assembled to work together to capture the information from the applied mark and generate an electronic image of the mark within an integrated, single housing, such as a handheld reader. Alternatively, these components may be bundled or combined (e.g. currently available universal serial bus (USB) microscope provide illumination, optics, and electronic sensors) as separate elements of part of a reader system, such as for use in a production assembly line operation for initial capture of microparticle marks.
In an embodiment, the automated reader housing includes means for optically isolating the illumination system, the detection system and the microparticle mark from an external environment. The automated reader may include a hood, for example, a foam member generally surrounding a field of view of the detection system and adapted to interface proximate a perimeter of the microparticle mark. Examples of such hoods are shown in Figs. 1 IA-E, Microparticle Code Identification and Authentication
Referring to Fig. 8, a block diagram of the process for an embodiment depicting multilayer multi-colored microparticle mark identification/authentication is depicted. The steps for microparticle code verification/authentication broadly include (1) original setup and (2) field reading. Original setup broadly includes storing data or algorithms for determining each microparticle code and optionally additional reference data associated with a microparticle code.. Field reading broadly includes (a) capturing information for a microparticle mark on an article in the field, (b) processing microparticle information from the microparticle mark, (c) determining the microparticle code and retrieving reference data, and (d) reporting the identification/authentication results, along with associated reference data.
Once a set of one or more kinds of microparticles have been selected for a given set of microparticle mark to be applied to a corresponding set of articles, for example, by setting up the microparticle code associated with the set of microparticles as corresponding to the intended set of articles, the microparticle mark having the microparticle code can be applied to an article. While the microparticle codes associated with a given set of microparticles corresponding to an intended set of articles will generally be selected to be unique for a given manufacturer, article, distribution channel, in other embodiments the set of microparticles chosen for an intended set of articles may overlap. The microparticle mark can be applied manually or automatically. Manual application methods include extruding, molding, brushing, and spraying. Automatic application methods can include the techniques just mentioned, as well as, for example, roll coating and printing. The microparticle and carrier materials are described in detail above.
The following field reading process can be used to determine the identity and/or authenticity of an article and the mark on the article in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention. First, the sensor in the automatic reader apparatus is used to capture the light from the optics path and generates an electronic image of the mark. Once an electronic image of the mark has been generated, an image processing program can analyze the electronic image.
An embodiment of such an image-processing program is shown in shown in Fig. 9 and will be described, although variations and differences in other embodiments as described elsewhere may be applicable to this description of Fig. 9. A priori knowledge of the marks includes the particle size, number of layers, standard color definitions, and other distinctive aspects of the marks. The setup step includes the application of a priori knowledge to a specific application, and may also include the algorithms to be used. Calibration of the capture system is also part of the setup step, including settings such as depth of field, white balance, gamma, and so on. The capture step includes the taking of a dataset from the sample, and may further include taking more than one frame for averaging to reduce the effects of noise.
The mark data refers to the total dataset readable from a mark as an image. A mark may be viewed as a region on an article that contains introduced microparticles in a carrier medium, where the carrier could be an additional medium or a portion of the article itself. In some embodiments, the microparticles are fixed relative to the article in the microparticle mark, while in other embodiments the microparticle mark may be flexible. In some embodiments, the microparticles are randomly introduced into the microparticle mark, where in other embodiments the microparticles are pseudo-randomly introduced or purposefully located in the microparticle mark.
At the preprocess step, the raw captured data is prepared for further processing. This may include adjustments in calibration, noise reduction (such as by averaging of multiple image frames), and data transformations (such as by transforms to other color spaces or other dimensional spaces). For example, a red-green-blue (RGB) image may be mapped other color spaces, such as Lab, Luv, HSL, HSV, etc. Information such as position, height, or color space can be added to pattern-vector information to obtain a higher dimensional space which can enhance segmentation or identification.
The step of mark segmentation includes segmentation of microparticle marks from background data. This step reduces the amount of the computations involved in reading the mark and enhances the automatic read. Many different algorithms may be used for this step, and the specific algorithm can vary depending on the application. For computational efficiency, a priori knowledge of the information readable in microparticle marks may be used. For example, in an embodiment, the microparticles in a microparticle mark are present at low levels relative to the total dataset (because most of the data is background). Here, frequency-based segmentation algorithms are useful and a captured data may be passed through various statistical functions, to create a segmented foreground or background data. Segmentation may also be done manually (by picking the background color and removing all similar colors). Further examples include simple pixel thresholding, edge detection, transform filters (Fast Fourier Transform and inverse FFT). Watershed and neural networks may also be used.
In the next step, microparticle segmentation, the foreground bin is separated into distinct regions, with each region being an identified microparticle. The foreground dataset can be converted to microparticle region of interest by identifying collections or regions of neighboring data of proper size for the microparticles of interest.
The step of color identification involves the determination of which identified microparticles match definitions of standard microparticle colors. At this step, a transform to a desired color space may be used, if a transform was not done already. Thresholding may also be used to remap the microparticle data to standard colors. Neighboring colors may affect color recognition of both layer color and background color. Hue shifting is predictable for neighboring color and growth of a color region can be accomplished by identifying additional data shifted in the direction predicted by the neighboring color. In the step of color-layer segmentation, each microparticle is separated into distinct regions corresponding to the color layers. In an embodiment, a segmentation algorithm based on location and color thresholds can be used.
The step of identifying color layers includes the ordering of color layers identified within each microparticle region. This may be done by calculating centers of each layer region, calculating the distances between centers, and using distances to determine order. Errors that may result from this step include finding two small particles in a single identified microparticle region or splitting a single layer into a plurality of layers. Such errors may be reduced by examining vectors connecting the noted centers and requiring a linear relationship between them.
The step of determining microparticle code can be accomplished using an algorithm to generate the code or the microparticle code can be automatically looked up in a table or database to determine the code for the microparticles identified. Additionally, reference information associated with the code may also be retrieved.
In actual practice, the processing of the electronic image of the mark described above can present problems that generally must be overcome for effective reading of a microparticle code. While humans can look at an object or image and observe certain areas as a single color, electronic image data of these areas are generally made up of pixels of many different colors and not of a single color. This can arise for any number of reasons, including actual color variations in the object being imaged, variations in the lighting source(s), shadow variations, light scattering, substrate influences, and carrier influences. In addition, even though a microparticle set can be generated with microparticles formed from colored layers incorporating uniform, standard colors, the electronic image will generally present a multitude of various colored pixels for each of the uniform, standard colors incoφorated in the microparticles (i.e., the pixels observed for each colored layer are not all observed to have the same RGB values).
To obtain improved recognition of the microparticle layer colors, ranges are established for the R, G, and B values, such that an exact match is not required. Thus, a level of variability for each of the R, G, and B values for any given microparticle layer color can be assigned and any pixels falling within the specified resulting ranges can then be associated with that microparticle layer color. While this enables a much improved ability to identify each of the microparticle layers and their colors, many additional pixels can be present in the image that were part of the microparticle layers but whose color was not associated with one of the standard microparticle layer colors.
Some of the difficulties associated with the analysis can result from variations in lighting (brightness) and shadowing (darkness). These lighting (brightness) and shadowing (darkness) effects can be overcome by identifying a color and looking at ratios of the R, G, and B levels, not looking at the absolute values for each of the R, G, and B levels. Thus, a pixel with R=255, G=O and B=O is recognized to be pure, bright red. Another pixel with R=I 25, G=O and B=O is still recognized as pure red, but is darker. By analyzing the image to identify pixels with ratios of their R, G, and B values that match those of one of the standard microparticle layer colors, the microparticle layer color can be effectively identified, despite variations in brightness and shadowing. In addition, despite improvements in effectively identifying the standard microparticle layer colors as described hereinabove, difficulties can be encountered due to light scattering or reflecting from the substrate. When the scattering or reflecting occurs, the microparticle layer colors can be shifted from their standard colors. This can occur because of being illuminated by light reflected or scattered off of a colored substrate. As a result, some of the illumination reaching the microparticle is no longer of the same spectrum as the light source, but now has been "colored" by reflection or scattering off of the substrate.
Thus, for each of the colors of the substrate, light of some wavelengths can be selectively absorbed by the substrate while other wavelengths are not. The resulting light scattered and reflected, with its different spectrum, can then light the microparticles and contribute to a color shift of the microparticles or can reach the sensor and change the color signature for pixels associated with a microparticle. These color-shifting effects can be corrected for by adjusting the expected R, G, and B values for each of the standard microparticle layer colors for predicted values that can be expected due to the "shifted" illumination spectrum. Similarly, the expected R, G, and B values for each of the standard microparticle layer colors can also be corrected for the spectrum of the light source used to illuminate the mark. While the corrections made for determining a match -- due to the spectrum of the light source ~ can be made for all pixels in the image, the corrections needed due to background scattering may generally need only take into account the color of the background in the surrounding area of the microparticle (i.e., the color of the substrate in the areas scattering light onto the microparticle).
In one embodiment of an an anti-counterfeiting setting, if there is no valid three- dimensional microparticles identified of a valid unique code or match with reference data, depending upon what embodiments of the invention have been utilized, then the mark might be or is likely a counterfeit and the process can be stopped and it can be reported that the mark and/or product is not authenticated. If there is a match for the mark, the matching code can be reported. If it is ' desired to go a next level of security, the following steps relating to microparticle mark signature authentication can be used to authenticate mark's signature code based upon the signature characteristics of the microparticle mark. This step can represent a next- level of protection against counterfeiting.
In one embodiment of an anti-product diversion setting, if there is a match for the mark, the matching code can be reported and the source and/or distribution chain of the product and mark can be identified. If it is desired to go a next level of security, the following steps relating to microparticle mark signature identification can be used to identify mark's signature code based upon the signature characteristics of the microparticle mark. This step can represent a next-level of protection against product diversion.
Using Reader of Identification/Authentication of Unique Code
In addition to providing a next level of securing against counterfeiting, tampering, and product diversion, a microparticle mark signature code can be used to provide identification and/or authentication through comparison of a calculated alphanumeric string representing the signature to a database of existing original alphanumeric strings rather than through manual comparisons of raw images directly as described in U.S. Patent No. 6,309,690. This process can therefore greatly minimize the amount of storage needed to save information about products and marks and also speed up the process by comparing alphanumeric strings rather than digital or analog images. Reader Device
In an embodiment, a microparticle reader 110 may be configured as shown in Figs. 10A- D, 11A-E, and 12. Figs. 10A-D depict a display 111, lens assembly 112, and a main circuit board 113 connected to display 111. Six buttons 114A are connected to button-circuit board 114B. A USB plug 115 is mounted on the main circuit board. A rear spring battery contact 1 16 is connected to main circuit board 113, as is front battery 117 and lens assembly plug connector 118 and rear battery 119. The unit's housing 120 is designed to make the reader portable by hand.
As shown in Figs. 1 IA-E, in one embodiment an annular projection 121 may be fitted to lens assembly 112 for receiving a hood 122. As shown in Figs. 1 ID and 1 IE, Hood 122 may be adjustable so that both a restricted and non-restricted aperture is presented. Adjustments in hood
122 may be made depending on the amount of ambient light available when the microparticle reader is put into operation.
As shown in Fig. 12, in one embodiment the display 111 can display an enhanced image of a microparticle mark, such as the mark shown in Fig. 2. A user interface is provided by buttons 114A. Housing 110 is sized so that device 110 is relatively easy to carry by hand. Relationship between microparticle code, signature strings, and expression code
The hierarchical relationship between microparticle codes 300, signature strings 302, and expression codes 304 can be illustrated as shown in Fig. 13. The numeric abundance of unique combinations of microparticle codes, signature strings and expression codes is illustrated in Fig. 14. If the number of microparticle codes 300 is, for example, on the order of I On, then the number of signature strings 302 would be exponentially larger nx> while the number of expression codes would be further exponentially larger nΛx2.
Figure 15 shows how the relationships between individual microparticles 202 can be used to derive signature strings. Using the centroid of each microparticle 202, 204 as a reference, the generally rectangular shape defined by lines A, B, C, and D can be formed. Using the centroids joined by lines alpha, beta, and gamma forms a triangle shape between three microparticles 202.
Another triangle shape can be formed from the centroids of microparticles 202, 204 using lines a, b, and c. These patterns are illustrative only, since the relative position of microparticles 202, 204 can be used to generate a very large number of possible patterns that can be used as signature strings. Microparticle 204 is shown to illustrate that not all microparticles used need have the same or even similar attributes. Overall System Examples
Figure 16 is a block diagram of a process for authenticating a mark 500. Reader 502 captures an image 504 of mark 500. Image 504 includes microparticle code 506 and signature strings 508. Database 510 stores preselected microparticle codes, for example BRG for the color sequence Blue, Red, and Green that represents a valid microparticle code. Database 512 stores preselected signature strings, for example the signature strings 1, 2, and 3. Database 514 stores a predetermined coding order, for example, first the code for colors BRG, then the signature strings 1 and 2. When microparticle code 506 and signature strings 508 are sorted and/or combined as determined by databases 510, 512, and 514, an expression code results. For example, the expression code could be any of BRG 12, BRG 13, or 31 BRG, in this example.
An initial generation of expression codes may be used to generate a database of expression codes 518 to compare with expression code 516. First-time expression codes 518 may be identified, for example, with codes 520A, B, and C. In this example, these codes may be BRG 12, BRG 13, and 31 BRG, respectively, depending on the possible alternative combinations of predetermined coding order 514 and/or preselected signature strings 512. Codes 520A, B, and C are part of initial expression code generation 522. These codes are then used to populate expression code database 524.
Fig. 17 shows an embodiment of the process in Fig. A with a "challenge" process added to test the reliability of the system. An absolute-position database 600 is generated from mark 500. From the absolute-position data, challenge test 602 generates a database of challenge strings 604. Challenge strings 604 are communicated to the preselected signature-database 512 and used to generate signature strings 508 from image data 504. The resulting expression code 516 is then compared to challenge test 602. Because challenge strings 604 are generated from absolute-position data from mark 500, each of expression codes 516 produced by signature strings 508 based on image data 504 should be recognized as authentic by challenge test 602. Further, this embodiment depicts the determination of the microparticle code using an algorithm 606 rather than a database.
Fig. 18 shows an embodiment of an authentication process that relies only on signature strings to generate expression codes. Image data 504 from mark 500 is captured by reader 502. Microparticles in image data 504 are authenticated as expected microparticles by microparticle validation 700, in part by reference to database 702 of preselected valid microparticles. From the valid microparticles, signature strings 508 are identified. These signature strings 508 then produce an expression code or signature-string code 704, which may include only signature strings, or may include other code elements. The first time the process shown in Fig. 21 is implemented, a first-time expression code or signature-string code 706 may be generated. Exemplary signature-string codes are shown at 708A, B, and C, for example 12, 13, and 31. These expression codes or signature-string codes 706 are used to generate initial expression codes or signature-string codes 710, which then are used to populate database 712, which stores expression codes or signature-string codes. Exemplary signature-string codes may include, for example, 12, 13, 31, or 123.
The embodiments above are intended to be illustrative and not limiting. Additional embodiments are within the claims. In addition, although the present invention has been described with reference to particular embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that changes can be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Any incorporation by reference of documents above is limited such that no subject matter is incorporated that is contrary to the explicit disclosure herein.
For purposes of interpreting the claims for the present invention, it is expressly intended that the provisions of Section 112, sixth paragraph of 35 U.S.C. are not to be invoked unless the specific terms "means for" or "step for" are recited in a claim.

Claims

1. An automated reader for reading a microparticle mark that includes a multiplicity of multi-layer, multi-color microparticles, the automated reader comprising:
a handheld structure housing a processing system, an illumination system and a detection system powered by a power source, the illumination system and the detection system being adapted to capture at least one image of the microparticle mark,
wherein the processing system analyzes the at least one image and includes:
means for identifying at least one region of interest in the at least one image corresponding to at least one of the multi-layer, multi-color microparticles;
means for recognizing colors and layers for each region of interest;
means for recognizing a layer order of the colors and layers for each region of interest;
means for generating a code representative of the microparticle mark that is based on the colors and layers and the layer order of at least one of the at least one region of interest.
2. The automated reader of claim 1 wherein the means for identifying at least one region of interest comprises:
means for segmenting the at least one image into foreground areas and background areas;
means for grouping foreground areas into a region of interest based on proximity of the foreground areas by applying one or more additional filtering processes selected from the set including: color, edge detection, texture, fluorescence, luminescence, reflectance, transition filters, statistical based filters, fast Fourier transforms, watershed filters, neural filters, Bayesian filters or any combination thereof;
means for confirming each region of interest by applying one or more additional filtering processes selected from the set including: size, texture, fluorescence, luminescence, reflectance, or any combination thereof.
3. The automated reader of claim 1 wherein the means for recognizing colors and layers comprises:
means for performing a color transform on at least a portion of the at least one image to generate a transformed color space dataset where luminescence is separated from color information;
means for applying a threshold function to the transformed color space dataset to identify colors matching expected colors of the multi-layer, multi-color microparticles; and
means for recognizing different layers in each region of interest by identifying regions of common color in the transformed color space dataset.
4. The automated reader of claim 1 wherein the means for recognizing colors and layers comprises:
means for recognizing different layers in each region of interest by using edge detection;
means for performing a color transform on at least a portion of each layer to generate a transformed color space image where luminescence is separated out; and
means for applying a threshold function to the transformed color space image to identify a color of the at least a portion of each layer matching expected colors of the multi-layer, multi-color microparticles.
5. The automated reader of claim 1 wherein the means for recognizing the layer order comprises:
means for determining adjacent layers by virtue of a proximity of less than a predefined gap; and
identifying an order of the adjacent layers as the layer order.
6. The automated reader of claim 5 wherein the means for recognizing the layer order further comprises: means for resolving the layer order by requiring a center point of adjacent layers to have a linear bend of less than about 20 degrees.
7. The automated reader of claim 1 wherein the processing system further includes:
means for storing a predetermined set of codes representative of the valid multi- layer, multi-color microparticles expected for the microparticle mark; and
means for comparing the code to the predetermined set of codes to authenticate the microparticle mark.
8. The automated reader of claim 1 wherein the processing system further includes:
means for applying an algorithm to the code to determine if the code is a valid multi-layer, multi-color microparticles expected for the microparticle mark.
9. The automated reader of claim 1 wherein the processing system further includes:
means for generating at least one signature string representative of at least one feature relationship among only regions of interest in the microparticle mark that represent valid microparticles, the at least one signature string being generated based on at least one predetermined feature relationship stored in the automated reader that represents a valid signature string.
10. The automated reader of claim 9 wherein the processing system further includes:
means for generating at least one expression code for the microparticle mark based on the at least one signature string, the expression code being adapted to be compared to a predetermined database of valid expression codes to determine if there is a match.
11. The automated reader of claim 10 wherein the processing system further includes:
means for storing the predetermined database of valid expression codes that is operably housed within the handheld structure.
12. The automated reader of claims 7-11 further comprising a user interface operably connected to the processing system that displays an indication of an authentication of the microparticle mark based on a valid code selected from the set including: a valid microparticle code, a valid signature string, a valid expression code, or any combination thereof.
13. The automated reader of claim 10 wherein the predetermined database is remote from the automated reader and the automated reader further comprises means for communicating the expression code over a computer network to a processing system associated with the predetermined database such that the processing system determines if the match exists between the expression code and the predetermined database.
14. The automated reader of claim 10 wherein as part of the authentication of the microparticle mark, a challenge is communicated to the automated reader and the processing system further includes means for generating an additional expression code based on an indicated set of signature strings in the challenge.
15. The automated reader of claim 10 wherein the match is based on a confidence level that matches less than all of the expression code.
16. The automated reader of claims 10 wherein the means for generating at least one expression code generates the at least one expression code based on at least two different signature strings.
17. The automated reader of claim 16 wherein the match is performed at a reduced confidence level based on a match of less than all of the at least two different signature strings.
18. The automated reader of claim 16 wherein the means for generating at least one expression code generates the at least one expression code based on a predetermined order of the at least two different signature strings.
19. The automated reader of claim 16 wherein the means for generating at least one expression code generates at least two different expression codes based on at least two different combinations of signature strings, each expression code being a valid expression code for the same microparticle mark.
20. The automated reader of claim 9 wherein the means for generating the at least one signature string generates a plurality of features as part of a single signature string.
21. The automated reader or claim IU wnerein tne means ror generating me ai ieasi one expression code generates encrypts the at least one expression code.
22. The automated reader of claim 9 wherein the means for generating signature strings generates the at least one signature string using a process selected from the set including: a size of the microparticle, a length of microparticle perimeter, an aspect ration of the microparticle, a major axis of the microparticle, a minor axis of the microparticle, an average color of the microparticle, a shape of the microparticle, a texture of the microparticle (e.g., smooth, rough, gloss), a pattern of the microparticle (e.g., striped, circular, layered, solid, spotted, woven), an indicia on the microparticle (e.g., text and graphics), and an orientation of the microparticle, or any combination thereof.
23. The automated reader of claim I wherein the illumination system comprises a plurality of light sources, each of the light sources being independently and variably controllable by the processing system to dynamically illuminate the microparticle mark.
24. The automated reader of claim 1 wherein the housing includes means for optically isolating the illumination system, the detection system and the microparticle mark from an external environment.
25. The automated reader of claim 24 wherein the means for optically isolating includes a foam member generally surrounding a field of view of the detection system and adapted to interface proximate a perimeter of the microparticle mark.
26. The automated reader of claim 1 wherein the means for generating the code utilizes multiple colors in a single kind of microparticle.
27. The automated reader of claim 1 wherein the means for generating the code utilizes multiple colors from a plurality of kinds of microparticles, each having different arrangements of multiple colors.
28. A method of using the automatic reader as claimed in claims 1-27 for identifying and authenticating articles using information captured from marks incorporating microparticles. marks incorporating microparticles using components of the automated reader as separate components in the manner as claimed in claims 1-27.
PCT/US2007/006387 2006-03-13 2007-03-13 Automatic microparticle mark reader WO2007106514A2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP07753042A EP1999873A2 (en) 2006-03-13 2007-03-13 Automatic microparticle mark reader

Applications Claiming Priority (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US78195506P 2006-03-13 2006-03-13
US78162606P 2006-03-13 2006-03-13
US78193006P 2006-03-13 2006-03-13
US60/781,626 2006-03-13
US60/781,955 2006-03-13
US60/781,930 2006-03-13

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2007106514A2 true WO2007106514A2 (en) 2007-09-20
WO2007106514A3 WO2007106514A3 (en) 2008-11-20
WO2007106514A9 WO2007106514A9 (en) 2009-01-29

Family

ID=38510067

Family Applications (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2007/006387 WO2007106514A2 (en) 2006-03-13 2007-03-13 Automatic microparticle mark reader
PCT/US2007/006378 WO2007106512A2 (en) 2006-03-13 2007-03-13 Three-dimensional authentication of microparticle mark
PCT/US2007/006388 WO2007106515A2 (en) 2006-03-13 2007-03-13 Expression codes for microparticle marks based on signature strings

Family Applications After (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2007/006378 WO2007106512A2 (en) 2006-03-13 2007-03-13 Three-dimensional authentication of microparticle mark
PCT/US2007/006388 WO2007106515A2 (en) 2006-03-13 2007-03-13 Expression codes for microparticle marks based on signature strings

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (5) US8033450B2 (en)
EP (3) EP1999873A2 (en)
WO (3) WO2007106514A2 (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7720254B2 (en) 2006-03-13 2010-05-18 Smi Holdings, Inc. Automatic microparticle mark reader
US7874489B2 (en) 2005-06-20 2011-01-25 Authentiform Technologies, Llc Product authentication
US8247018B2 (en) 2005-06-20 2012-08-21 Authentiform Technologies, Llc Methods for quality control
US8458475B2 (en) 2005-06-20 2013-06-04 Authentiform Technologies, L.L.C. Systems and methods for product authentication
US9053364B2 (en) 2012-10-30 2015-06-09 Authentiform, LLC Product, image, or document authentication, verification, and item identification

Families Citing this family (28)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7162035B1 (en) 2000-05-24 2007-01-09 Tracer Detection Technology Corp. Authentication method and system
US8171567B1 (en) 2002-09-04 2012-05-01 Tracer Detection Technology Corp. Authentication method and system
US20080128496A1 (en) * 2006-12-01 2008-06-05 Patrick Bertranou Method and apparatus for verification of items
US7995196B1 (en) 2008-04-23 2011-08-09 Tracer Detection Technology Corp. Authentication method and system
US20120125999A1 (en) * 2009-05-29 2012-05-24 International Frontier Technology Laboratory, Inc. Keycard and keycard-lock
WO2012057459A1 (en) * 2010-10-26 2012-05-03 Park Kwang-Don Random-type multilayer identification, and system using same
FR2968667B1 (en) * 2010-12-13 2013-01-11 Areva NUCLEAR CENTER COMPONENT WITH LUMINESCENT NANOPARTICLE MARKING, METHOD AND CORRESPONDING READING ASSEMBLY
US8469282B2 (en) * 2011-03-21 2013-06-25 James Freeman Optically readable identification security tag or stamp
US8488842B2 (en) * 2011-06-23 2013-07-16 Covectra, Inc. Systems and methods for tracking and authenticating goods
US10441903B2 (en) 2011-07-16 2019-10-15 Cummins Filtration Ip, Inc. Filter with electrical signature anti-counterfeiting feature
US9082062B2 (en) 2011-10-10 2015-07-14 Zortag, Inc. Method of, and system and label for, authenticating objects in situ
US8985471B2 (en) * 2011-10-12 2015-03-24 James Freeman Optically readable identification security tag or stamp
US9057712B1 (en) 2011-10-27 2015-06-16 Copilot Ventures Fund Iii Llc Methods of delivery of encapsulated perfluorocarbon taggants
US9291609B2 (en) * 2012-04-30 2016-03-22 Ut-Battelle, Llc Sensor system for fuel transport vehicle
EP2688011A1 (en) 2012-07-19 2014-01-22 3S Simons Security Systems GmbH Microparticle, in particular microparticle for tamper-proof marking of products
DE102012022216A1 (en) * 2012-11-13 2014-05-15 Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh Device and method for checking value documents
WO2014120188A1 (en) * 2013-01-31 2014-08-07 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Forensic signature
JP5998090B2 (en) * 2013-03-25 2016-09-28 日立オムロンターミナルソリューションズ株式会社 Image collation device, image collation method, and image collation program
EP3046607A4 (en) 2013-11-26 2017-06-07 Bayer Healthcare LLC System and method for medical fluid identification and verification
US20150179090A1 (en) * 2013-12-19 2015-06-25 Avishay Blankitny Multidimensional label having a shape indicative marker
EP2896508B1 (en) 2014-01-16 2016-12-28 3S Simons Security Systems GmbH Recognition system for security codes
US10295608B2 (en) * 2014-07-18 2019-05-21 Phoenix Broadband Technologies, Llc Non-intrusive correlating battery monitoring system and method
US9871660B2 (en) * 2014-12-23 2018-01-16 Banco De Mexico Method for certifying and authentifying security documents based on a measure of the relative variations of the different processes involved in its manufacture
EP3089118B1 (en) 2015-04-29 2018-11-14 3S Simons Security Systems GmbH Access authorization system comprising at least one assembly of a plurality of microparticles and at least one identifying unit
US20170102225A1 (en) * 2015-10-07 2017-04-13 Consolidated Container Company System and method for non-destructive layer detection
EP3156945A1 (en) 2015-10-13 2017-04-19 3S Simons Security Systems GmbH Method for producing at least one microparticle, in particular a microparticle for the non-falsifiable marking of products, and microparticle
CN111444191B (en) * 2019-06-13 2021-10-12 黄亚娟 Cosmic space data system, method, computer device and storage medium
US11295126B1 (en) 2021-06-24 2022-04-05 Covectra, Inc. Methods for authenticating goods using randomly distributed flecks and serialization codes

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4053433A (en) * 1975-02-19 1977-10-11 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Method of tagging with color-coded microparticles
US4390452A (en) * 1979-08-20 1983-06-28 Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company Microparticles with visual identifying means
US4606927A (en) * 1983-08-10 1986-08-19 Jones Ronald L Article identification
US6647649B2 (en) * 1998-12-04 2003-11-18 Tracking Technologies, Inc. Microparticle taggant systems

Family Cites Families (208)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US341778A (en) * 1886-05-11 Incandescing electric lamp
US3013958A (en) 1961-12-19 Isotopic labelling
US1787995A (en) 1928-03-10 1931-01-06 Frank C Reilly Liquid identification
US2088412A (en) 1933-06-24 1937-07-27 William M Grosvenor Process of making self-identifying composition of matter
US2058774A (en) 1934-03-31 1936-10-27 Texas Co Marking petroleum products
US2265196A (en) 1940-04-30 1941-12-09 Charles H Riley Concealed marker for alcohols and method of identification thereof
US2687367A (en) 1952-05-05 1954-08-24 Lilly Co Eli Medicinal tablet containing identification fragments
US2963378A (en) 1955-04-25 1960-12-06 Minnesota Mining & Mfg Ass beads hemispherically reflectorled with metallic coating and compositions thereof
US2885366A (en) 1956-06-28 1959-05-05 Du Pont Product comprising a skin of dense, hydrated amorphous silica bound upon a core of another solid material and process of making same
US3113991A (en) 1959-08-18 1963-12-10 Nuclear Corp Of America Method of tagging bulk materials
US3128744A (en) 1963-01-02 1964-04-14 Keith B Jefferts Method for investigating the migratory habits of macro-organisms
US3451778A (en) 1965-07-06 1969-06-24 Robert E Fearon Method of labeling
GB1152336A (en) * 1965-08-30 1969-05-14 Sylvania Electric Prod Electrostatic Writing Tube and method of manufacture
US3366573A (en) 1965-10-24 1968-01-30 Canrad Prec Ind Inc Coated phosphor having radioisotope dispersed therein and method of preparation
DE1961474U (en) 1967-03-07 1967-06-01 Heinrich Lincke DEVICE FOR THE AUTOMATIC EXTRACTION OF CIGARETTES AFTER OPENING A CONVENTIONAL PACKAGE.
US3567909A (en) 1967-11-09 1971-03-02 Dillis V Allen Information handling system
US3663685A (en) * 1968-04-01 1972-05-16 Minnesota Mining & Mfg Biodegradable radioactive particles
CH495017A (en) 1968-07-16 1970-08-15 Ciba Geigy Method for scanning color codes and converting them into binary codes, as well as means for carrying out this method
US3574550A (en) * 1968-10-18 1971-04-13 Sun Oil Co Means of identifying crude oil and other materials
US3861886A (en) 1968-11-13 1975-01-21 Melpar Inc Material identification coding methods and systems
DE1961474A1 (en) 1968-12-19 1970-07-02 Leuna Werke Veb N-unsubst oxaziridines (isoximes)
US3632993A (en) 1969-08-25 1972-01-04 Scanner Color code system
US3628271A (en) 1969-09-26 1971-12-21 Hc Ind Fluorescent marking
US3704952A (en) 1969-12-29 1972-12-05 Environment One Corp Fluid medium source tracer method
US3835297A (en) 1970-02-05 1974-09-10 Inoue Michiro Microfilm provided with color codes and device for recording and reproducing such codes
US3733178A (en) 1970-04-02 1973-05-15 Allergan Pharma Chemical coding method
US3700305A (en) 1970-12-14 1972-10-24 Minnesota Mining & Mfg Retroreflective microspheres having a dielectric mirror on a portion of their surface and retroreflective constructions containing such microspheres
US3897284A (en) 1971-04-30 1975-07-29 Minnesota Mining & Mfg Tagging explosives with organic microparticles
US3772200A (en) 1971-04-30 1973-11-13 Minnesota Mining & Mfg Method of tagging with microparticles
US4018635A (en) * 1971-05-17 1977-04-19 Westinghouse Electric Corporation Phosphor combination, particularly adapted for use with explosives, for providing a distinctive information label
US3772099A (en) 1971-05-17 1973-11-13 Westinghouse Electric Corp Phosphor combination and method, particularly adapted for use with explosives, for providing a distinctive information label
USRE29334E (en) 1971-05-17 1977-08-02 Westinghouse Electric Corporation Phosphor combination and method, particularly adapted for use with explosives, for providing a distinctive information label
US3736500A (en) 1971-10-26 1973-05-29 Gen Electric Liquid identification using magnetic particles having a preselected curie temperature
US3788814A (en) 1972-02-01 1974-01-29 Atomic Energy Commission Highly enriched multiply-labeled stable isotopic compounds as atmospheric tracers
US3964294A (en) 1972-03-13 1976-06-22 California Institute Of Technology Technique and system for coding and identifying materials
US3835782A (en) 1972-09-22 1974-09-17 Commercial Solvents Corp Product and method
DE2257431B2 (en) 1972-11-23 1978-02-23 Hoechst Ag, 6000 Frankfurt MEASURES FOR ROAD MARKING
US4013490A (en) * 1973-03-27 1977-03-22 Westinghouse Electric Corporation Phosphor identification method, particularly adapted for use with explosives, for providing a distinctive information label
US4097279A (en) 1974-01-08 1978-06-27 Edwin Nelson Whitehead Process for preparing an identification card
AT348780B (en) 1974-05-07 1979-03-12 Weber Lichtsteuergeraete Kg SCANNER WITH PHOTOCELLS TO
US3985602A (en) 1974-10-11 1976-10-12 Sangray Corporation Transfer process and composite sheet therefor
US4029506A (en) 1974-10-21 1977-06-14 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Universal product code marking composition containing a photosensitive dye former, a pigment and a binder and the use thereof
US3950891A (en) 1975-01-03 1976-04-20 Florida Celery Exchange Seed coating composition and coated seed
US3967990A (en) 1975-03-03 1976-07-06 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Interior Combination of band-type and line-type emission phosphors with explosive
CA1056653A (en) 1975-11-10 1979-06-19 Edward J. Stevens Color-coded identifier microparticles
CA1076481A (en) 1976-05-24 1980-04-29 Jen C. Hsia Drug compositions
US4131064A (en) 1977-07-15 1978-12-26 Westinghouse Electric Corp. Tagging particles which are easily detected by luminescent response, or magnetic pickup, or both
US4238524A (en) 1978-03-06 1980-12-09 American Optical Corporation Process for identification marking clear plastic articles
US4243734A (en) 1978-07-10 1981-01-06 Dillon George A Micro-dot identification
US4198307A (en) * 1978-07-24 1980-04-15 General Electric Company Polymer based magnetic tags
US4197104A (en) 1978-09-21 1980-04-08 General Electric Company Magnetic tag process
US4469623A (en) 1978-09-28 1984-09-04 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Detection of articles
US4399226A (en) 1978-09-28 1983-08-16 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Tagging with microcapsules containing perfluoroalkyl pentafluorosulfide
US4251726A (en) 1979-02-26 1981-02-17 Alvarez Luis W Deuterium tagged articles such as explosives and method for detection thereof
US4431766A (en) 1979-11-05 1984-02-14 Stauffer Chemical Company Coded polymeric material and method
US4329393A (en) 1980-05-21 1982-05-11 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Coating compositions for retrospective identification of articles
US4785290A (en) 1980-06-23 1988-11-15 Light Signatures, Inc. Non-counterfeitable document system
US4359399A (en) 1980-08-27 1982-11-16 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force Taggants with explosive induced magnetic susceptibility
US4321056A (en) 1980-12-29 1982-03-23 Cummins Engine Company, Inc. Measurement of engine oil consumption
US4359353A (en) 1981-05-18 1982-11-16 Hydrocarbon Research, Inc. Polypeptides as chemical tagging materials
US4441943A (en) 1981-05-18 1984-04-10 Hri Inc. Polypeptides as chemical tagging materials
US4640035A (en) 1981-09-03 1987-02-03 The Secretary Of State For Defence In Her Britannic Majesty's Government Of The United Kingdom Of Great Britain And Northern Ireland Identifying means
US4397142A (en) 1981-12-07 1983-08-09 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Coded threads and sheet material useful for making such coded threads
US4454324A (en) * 1981-12-14 1984-06-12 Mead Johnson & Company Process for production of encainide
US4690689A (en) 1983-03-02 1987-09-01 Columbia Gas System Service Corp. Gas tracer composition and method
US4520109A (en) * 1983-03-14 1985-05-28 Sun Tech, Inc. Fluorocarbon tracers and tracing method
US4771005A (en) 1983-06-27 1988-09-13 Erez Forensic Technology Ltd. Reagents, test kits and methods for the detection of cannabinoids
US4764474A (en) 1983-12-16 1988-08-16 Morton Thiokol, Inc. Method for detecting a tagging compound
GB8403128D0 (en) 1984-02-07 1984-03-14 Amersham Int Plc Standard for analysis
US4654165A (en) 1985-04-16 1987-03-31 Micro Tracers, Inc. Microingredient containing tracer
GB2178481B (en) 1985-07-24 1988-03-23 Plessey Co Plc Security containers or enclosures
US4652395A (en) 1985-10-21 1987-03-24 The W. W. Henry Company Taggant composition
US4731531A (en) 1986-01-29 1988-03-15 Halliburton Company Method of logging a well using a non-radioactive material irradiated into an isotope exhibiting a detectable characteristic
GB8615706D0 (en) * 1986-06-27 1986-08-06 Plessey Co Plc Irreversible photochromic markings
US4744919A (en) 1986-09-12 1988-05-17 Kms Fusion, Inc. Method of dispersing particulate aerosol tracer
US4862143A (en) 1986-12-04 1989-08-29 Isomed, Inc. Method and apparatus for detecting counterfeit articles
US5023923A (en) 1987-02-11 1991-06-11 Light Signatures, Inc. Programmable sensor aperture
FR2611064B1 (en) 1987-02-13 1989-06-16 Schvoerer Max METHOD OF MARKING OBJECTS BY MICRO-CRYSTALS WITH MEMORY EFFECT AND MARKERS FOR IMPLEMENTING SAME
US4812412A (en) 1987-02-26 1989-03-14 Health Research Inc. Standard specimen and method of making and using same
US4824144A (en) * 1987-04-10 1989-04-25 Tasma Gerald W Color identification system
US4964945A (en) * 1988-12-09 1990-10-23 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Lift off patterning process on a flexible substrate
US5169558A (en) 1989-07-21 1992-12-08 Fox Valley Systems, Inc. Two-part aerosol composition for increasing the light reflectivity of an object
US5035920A (en) 1989-07-21 1991-07-30 Fox Valley Systems, Inc. Two-step method for increasing the light-reflectivity of an object
CA1310139C (en) 1989-07-31 1992-11-10 Joseph S. Tang Method for determining residual oil saturation of a watered-out reservoir
GB8924111D0 (en) 1989-10-26 1989-12-13 Amblehurst Ltd Optical device
US5411799A (en) 1990-02-20 1995-05-02 Loving; Charles D. Microtag and method
US5129974A (en) 1990-08-23 1992-07-14 Colorcode Unlimited Corporation Microlabelling system and method of making thin labels
US5118369A (en) * 1990-08-23 1992-06-02 Colorcode Unlimited Corporation Microlabelling system and process for making microlabels
US5192559A (en) * 1990-09-27 1993-03-09 3D Systems, Inc. Apparatus for building three-dimensional objects with sheets
US5057268A (en) 1990-12-19 1991-10-15 The Mitre Corporation Method and composition of matter for detecting large quantities of paper currency
US5272216A (en) 1990-12-28 1993-12-21 Westinghouse Electric Corp. System and method for remotely heating a polymeric material to a selected temperature
US5179027A (en) 1991-01-10 1993-01-12 Fisher Murray M Method employing chemical markers and kit for verifying the source and completeness of urine samples for testing for the presence of drugs of abuse
US5111882A (en) 1991-06-06 1992-05-12 Exxon Production Research Company Use of tracers to monitor in situ miscibility of solvent in oil reservoirs during EOR
US5831676A (en) 1992-08-19 1998-11-03 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Image pickup device using plural control parameters for exposure control
US5268899A (en) 1991-10-17 1993-12-07 3Com Corporation Apparatus for generating pseudo-random numbers in a communication system, or other system involving a shared resource
US5677187A (en) 1992-01-29 1997-10-14 Anderson, Ii; David K. Tagging chemical compositions
US5474937A (en) 1993-01-25 1995-12-12 Isotag, L.L.C. Method of identifying chemicals by use of non-radioactive isotopes
US5217708A (en) 1992-02-05 1993-06-08 Defense Technology Corporation Of America Capsicum lachrymator
US5369261A (en) 1992-02-12 1994-11-29 Shamir; Harry Multi-color information encoding system
US5426298A (en) * 1992-03-17 1995-06-20 Ricoh Company, Ltd. Optical scanner
US5246861A (en) 1992-06-05 1993-09-21 Conoco Inc. Use of nonradioactive complex metal anion as tracer in subterranean reservoirs
US5789183A (en) 1992-08-14 1998-08-04 University Of Arkansas Serological detection and identification of rice blast
JP3577503B2 (en) 1992-09-28 2004-10-13 大日本インキ化学工業株式会社 Color code
US5380047A (en) 1992-09-30 1995-01-10 The Upper Deck Company Authentication system
US5267756A (en) 1992-09-30 1993-12-07 The Upper Deck Company Authentication system
GB9222001D0 (en) 1992-10-20 1992-12-02 Ici Plc Shock tube initator
FR2697328A1 (en) 1992-10-23 1994-04-29 Giat Ind Sa Smoke shell with generating pots and ejector - has pots linked by temporary plastic connector to hold them together until ejected
US5450190A (en) 1993-05-13 1995-09-12 Caribbean Microparticles Corp. Composition, method and apparatus for providing a coded hidden identification on a selected printable item by a coded printing composition
US5521984A (en) 1993-06-10 1996-05-28 Verification Technologies, Inc. System for registration, identification and verification of items utilizing unique intrinsic features
GB9314394D0 (en) 1993-07-12 1993-08-25 Slater James H A security device using an ultrasensitive microtrace for protecting materials,articles and items
NL9301405A (en) 1993-08-12 1995-03-01 Piet Hein Heezemans System for marking and identifying objects, using odoriferous volatile substances
US6019287A (en) 1993-10-06 2000-02-01 3M Innovative Properties Company Security reader for automatic detection of tampering and alteration
US20020009208A1 (en) * 1995-08-09 2002-01-24 Adnan Alattar Authentication of physical and electronic media objects using digital watermarks
US8505108B2 (en) 1993-11-18 2013-08-06 Digimarc Corporation Authentication using a digital watermark
GB9326277D0 (en) 1993-12-23 1994-02-23 Marconi Gec Ltd Labelling
US7039214B2 (en) * 1999-11-05 2006-05-02 Digimarc Corporation Embedding watermark components during separate printing stages
US5619025A (en) * 1994-05-05 1997-04-08 Network Security Technologies Method for tamper-proof identification using photorefractive crystals
DE4441651A1 (en) 1994-11-23 1996-04-25 Basf Ag Polymerisable material for coating and printing substrates
US5659631A (en) 1995-02-21 1997-08-19 Ricoh Company, Ltd. Data compression for indexed color image data
US6721440B2 (en) * 1995-05-08 2004-04-13 Digimarc Corporation Low visibility watermarks using an out-of-phase color
US5873604A (en) * 1995-05-25 1999-02-23 Verify First Technologies, Inc. Document security system having thermo-activated pantograph and validation mark
US6019827A (en) * 1995-09-14 2000-02-01 Hewlett-Packard Company Reliability enhancement of microemulsion-based ink-jet inks
US5837042A (en) 1996-06-10 1998-11-17 Videojet Systems International, Inc. Invisible fluorescent jet ink
DE19541028C2 (en) 1995-11-05 1998-01-22 Daimler Benz Ag Effect varnish with pigments bearing a label, and process for its production
GB2309685B (en) 1996-01-31 1999-10-27 Portals Security packaging
GB2310755A (en) * 1996-02-28 1997-09-03 Sharp Kk A method of etching a semiconductor structure
US5869828A (en) 1996-04-02 1999-02-09 Braginsky; Philip Yale Color and shape system for encoding and decoding data
DE19614174A1 (en) 1996-04-10 1997-11-06 Simons Druck & Vertrieb Gmbh Process for the production of multilayer microparticles
US6232124B1 (en) 1996-05-06 2001-05-15 Verification Technologies, Inc. Automated fingerprint methods and chemistry for product authentication and monitoring
US5760394A (en) * 1996-05-17 1998-06-02 Welle; Richard P. Isotopic taggant method and composition
DE19619973C2 (en) 1996-05-17 2002-12-19 Daimler Chrysler Ag Interference pigments for effect paints, the paint made from them and the paint applied with them
JPH1082986A (en) 1996-07-15 1998-03-31 Sony Corp Reflection type guest-host liquid crystal display device
EP1012747A4 (en) * 1996-09-13 2001-01-31 Purdue Research Foundation Authentication of signals using watermarks
GB2319337B (en) 1996-11-12 1999-09-29 Probe Fx Patents Limited Compositions and methods for tracing or identifying goods or their theft
US6025200A (en) 1996-12-21 2000-02-15 Tracer Detection Technology Corp. Method for remote detection of volatile taggant
US5818032A (en) 1997-01-03 1998-10-06 Sun; Tsu-Hung Tom Encoded color halftone micro-dots for high density digital information storage
US5974974A (en) 1997-07-01 1999-11-02 Polyfibron Technologies, Inc. Substantially transparent printing blankets and methods for using same
US5962082A (en) 1997-08-19 1999-10-05 Aveka, Inc. Process for applying liquid coatings to solid particulate substrates
US6030000A (en) * 1997-09-12 2000-02-29 Diamond Security, Inc. Negotiable document having enhanced security for deterring fraud by use of a thermochromatic fingerprint image
US5974150A (en) 1997-09-30 1999-10-26 Tracer Detection Technology Corp. System and method for authentication of goods
EP0927749B1 (en) 1997-12-29 2003-02-26 Sicpa Holding S.A. Coating composition, use of particles, method for tagging and identifying a security document comprising said coating composition
US6424954B1 (en) * 1998-02-17 2002-07-23 Neopost Inc. Postage metering system
US6432715B1 (en) 1998-02-24 2002-08-13 Isotag Technology, Inc. Method for marking items for identification
EP1060460B1 (en) 1998-03-06 2002-07-24 Security Graphics B.V. Identification mark comprising an optically and electronically readable marking
US6242056B1 (en) 1998-05-08 2001-06-05 Innovative Concepts Unlimited, Llc Process for applying light-emission-enhancement microbead paint compositions
US6108612A (en) 1998-06-23 2000-08-22 Interval Research Corporation Coded objects and methods for detecting such coded objects
US6587944B2 (en) * 1998-06-29 2003-07-01 Intel Corporation Fragile watermarking for objects
US6147149A (en) 1999-03-03 2000-11-14 Glouster Co., Inc. Adhesive caulking material which can mimic the appearance of a multicolored stone surface
US6165609A (en) 1998-10-30 2000-12-26 Avery Dennison Corporation Security coatings for label materials
DE19853764A1 (en) 1998-11-21 2000-05-31 Simons Druck & Vertrieb Gmbh System for securing and labeling products using microparticles
US6692031B2 (en) * 1998-12-31 2004-02-17 Mcgrew Stephen P. Quantum dot security device and method
US6490030B1 (en) 1999-01-18 2002-12-03 Verification Technologies, Inc. Portable product authentication device
US7038766B2 (en) 1999-04-01 2006-05-02 Microtrace, Llc Identification particles and system and method for retrospective identification using spectral codes
US6309690B1 (en) 1999-04-01 2001-10-30 Microtrace, Inc. System for retrospective identification and method of marking articles for retrospective identification
DE19915897A1 (en) 1999-04-08 2000-10-19 Madeira Garnfabrik Rudolf Schm Process for marking textile products
US6908737B2 (en) 1999-04-15 2005-06-21 Vitra Bioscience, Inc. Systems and methods of conducting multiplexed experiments
US6512580B1 (en) * 1999-10-27 2003-01-28 Verification Technologies, Inc. Method and apparatus for portable product authentication
EP1252602A4 (en) 1999-11-09 2003-06-18 Spectra Science Corp Authentication and coding by size, shape, and fluorescence
US6691916B2 (en) * 2000-02-07 2004-02-17 Frederick D. Noyes Autograph verification and authentication system
US20010049101A1 (en) 2000-02-23 2001-12-06 Brian Brogger Micro-label biological assay system
US6659507B2 (en) 2000-04-03 2003-12-09 American Bank Note Holographics, Inc. Enhanced security for tamper-apparent labels, seals or tags
US7305104B2 (en) * 2000-04-21 2007-12-04 Digimarc Corporation Authentication of identification documents using digital watermarks
US6589626B2 (en) 2000-06-30 2003-07-08 Verification Technologies, Inc. Copy-protected optical media and method of manufacture thereof
US6638593B2 (en) 2000-06-30 2003-10-28 Verification Technologies, Inc. Copy-protected optical media and method of manufacture thereof
US6735324B1 (en) 2000-07-31 2004-05-11 Digimarc Corporation Digital watermarks and trading cards
US6948068B2 (en) * 2000-08-15 2005-09-20 Spectra Systems Corporation Method and apparatus for reading digital watermarks with a hand-held reader device
US7039766B1 (en) * 2000-10-12 2006-05-02 International Business Machines Corporation Prescheduling sequential data prefetches in a preexisting LRU cache
TW538385B (en) * 2000-10-23 2003-06-21 Chia-Lun Tsai Method of using a security feature which includes plural patterned microscopic markers for authentication and to prevent counterfeiting of objects
WO2002039714A2 (en) * 2000-11-08 2002-05-16 Digimarc Corporation Content authentication and recovery using digital watermarks
US6572784B1 (en) 2000-11-17 2003-06-03 Flex Products, Inc. Luminescent pigments and foils with color-shifting properties
US6477227B1 (en) 2000-11-20 2002-11-05 Keymaster Technologies, Inc. Methods for identification and verification
US6406725B1 (en) 2001-01-11 2002-06-18 Roy D. Taylor Method of visually labelling agricultural commodites
US6501825B2 (en) 2001-01-19 2002-12-31 Keymaster Technologies, Inc. Methods for identification and verification
US7046828B1 (en) 2001-04-13 2006-05-16 Gibbs Jerald R Method and system for verifying and authenticating signed collectibles
US7822969B2 (en) * 2001-04-16 2010-10-26 Digimarc Corporation Watermark systems and methods
US20040004829A1 (en) 2001-09-07 2004-01-08 Nini Policappelli Illuminating, heating or cooling a consumer product
AU2002352987A1 (en) * 2001-11-30 2003-06-17 Tracking Technology Inc. Taggants for products and method of taggant identification
US6909770B2 (en) 2001-12-05 2005-06-21 The United States Of America As Represented By The United States National Aeronautics And Space Administration Methods for identification and verification using vacuum XRF system
US20040029295A1 (en) 2002-02-14 2004-02-12 Brogger Brian J. Non-toxic biodegradable microtaggants
US20030194052A1 (en) 2002-04-12 2003-10-16 Price L. Stephen Methods for identification and verification
US6850592B2 (en) * 2002-04-12 2005-02-01 Keymaster Technologies, Inc. Methods for identification and verification using digital equivalent data system
US7718238B2 (en) 2002-05-13 2010-05-18 Sabic Innovative Plastics Ip B.V. Plastics articles such as bottles with visual effect
WO2003098188A2 (en) 2002-05-17 2003-11-27 Nanoventions, Inc. Microstructured taggant particles, applications and methods of making the same
JP4127636B2 (en) * 2002-08-30 2008-07-30 株式会社東芝 Digital watermark embedding apparatus and method
CA2524390C (en) 2003-04-04 2012-06-05 Angstrom Technologies, Inc. Methods and ink compositions for invisibly printed security images having multiple authentication features
US6989525B2 (en) * 2003-05-14 2006-01-24 Lockheed Martin Corporation Method for using very small particles as obscurants and taggants
US6899827B2 (en) 2003-05-16 2005-05-31 Ut-Battelle, Llc Inorganic optical taggant and method of making
US7639889B2 (en) * 2004-11-10 2009-12-29 Fotonation Ireland Ltd. Method of notifying users regarding motion artifacts based on image analysis
US7604883B2 (en) * 2003-07-17 2009-10-20 Chrysler Group Llc Thermal integration of pressurized fuel cell systems with an expander and a heat exchanger coupled to the fuel cell for receiving waste heat from the housing of the fuel cell
US20050031838A1 (en) 2003-08-06 2005-02-10 Spectra Systems Corporation Taggant security system for paper products as a deterrent to counterfeiting
CN2715245Y (en) 2003-09-22 2005-08-03 兆日科技(深圳)有限公司 Texture password label
HUP0303536A2 (en) 2003-10-28 2005-11-28 Copthorne Trading Ltd. Storage unit provided with identity mark
US20050150964A1 (en) 2004-01-14 2005-07-14 Lo Allen K. Counterfeit proof label having optically-concealed cross reference color codes and apparatus for making same
US7767457B2 (en) 2004-01-20 2010-08-03 Inki Mun Method of use of taggants
US7055691B2 (en) 2004-02-27 2006-06-06 Owens-Illinois Healthcare Packaging Inc. Plastic packaging having embedded micro-particle taggants
US7407195B2 (en) 2004-04-14 2008-08-05 William Berson Label for receiving indicia having variable spectral emissivity values
US7687271B2 (en) 2004-04-22 2010-03-30 Kodak Graphic Communications Canada Company Covert authentication method and apparatus
DE112005000829T5 (en) * 2004-05-12 2007-04-19 Axsun Technologies, Inc., Billerica Method and device for validating erasable tags in distribution channels
US20050276906A1 (en) 2004-06-10 2005-12-15 Gary Metzger Systems and methods for detecting and verifying taggant information of a tagged item or substance
WO2005120854A1 (en) 2004-06-11 2005-12-22 Ahlstrom Kauttua Oy Layered security material and method of manufacturing such
US20050289061A1 (en) 2004-06-24 2005-12-29 Michael Kulakowski Secure authentication system for collectable and consumer items
US7674532B2 (en) 2004-07-19 2010-03-09 Honeywell International Inc Security taggants in adhesive plastic film laminate for pharmaceutical packaging
CN102742394B (en) 2004-08-26 2014-06-04 孟山都技术有限公司 Automated seed sampler and methods of sampling, testing and bulking seeds
US20060091670A1 (en) 2004-11-03 2006-05-04 Gaynor Lawrence D Method for ensuring authenticity of beauty products
WO2006081585A2 (en) * 2005-01-27 2006-08-03 Sarnoff Corporation Method and apparatus for providing improved workflow for digital watermarking
US8033450B2 (en) 2006-03-13 2011-10-11 Smi Holdings, Inc. Expression codes for microparticle marks based on signature strings
US20070251438A1 (en) 2006-04-28 2007-11-01 Cheng Tien Int'l Corp. Adjustable punching device
US20100194265A1 (en) * 2007-07-09 2010-08-05 Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Light-emitting materials for electroluminescent devices

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4053433A (en) * 1975-02-19 1977-10-11 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Method of tagging with color-coded microparticles
US4390452A (en) * 1979-08-20 1983-06-28 Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company Microparticles with visual identifying means
US4606927A (en) * 1983-08-10 1986-08-19 Jones Ronald L Article identification
US6647649B2 (en) * 1998-12-04 2003-11-18 Tracking Technologies, Inc. Microparticle taggant systems

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7874489B2 (en) 2005-06-20 2011-01-25 Authentiform Technologies, Llc Product authentication
US8247018B2 (en) 2005-06-20 2012-08-21 Authentiform Technologies, Llc Methods for quality control
US8458475B2 (en) 2005-06-20 2013-06-04 Authentiform Technologies, L.L.C. Systems and methods for product authentication
US7720254B2 (en) 2006-03-13 2010-05-18 Smi Holdings, Inc. Automatic microparticle mark reader
US7831042B2 (en) 2006-03-13 2010-11-09 Smi Holdings, Inc. Three-dimensional authentication of microparticle mark
US8033450B2 (en) 2006-03-13 2011-10-11 Smi Holdings, Inc. Expression codes for microparticle marks based on signature strings
US8223964B2 (en) 2006-03-13 2012-07-17 Smi Holdings, Inc. Three-dimensional authentication of mircoparticle mark
US9053364B2 (en) 2012-10-30 2015-06-09 Authentiform, LLC Product, image, or document authentication, verification, and item identification

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20100128925A1 (en) 2010-05-27
WO2007106514A3 (en) 2008-11-20
WO2007106514A9 (en) 2009-01-29
US8033450B2 (en) 2011-10-11
EP2011008A4 (en) 2016-06-22
US20090136079A1 (en) 2009-05-28
EP1998710A2 (en) 2008-12-10
EP2011008A2 (en) 2009-01-07
WO2007106512A3 (en) 2008-11-20
US20110019905A1 (en) 2011-01-27
US20080034426A1 (en) 2008-02-07
US7831042B2 (en) 2010-11-09
US7720254B2 (en) 2010-05-18
EP2011008B1 (en) 2020-11-18
EP1999873A2 (en) 2008-12-10
EP1998710A4 (en) 2016-06-22
US7885428B2 (en) 2011-02-08
WO2007106515A2 (en) 2007-09-20
US8223964B2 (en) 2012-07-17
US20100327050A1 (en) 2010-12-30
WO2007106515A3 (en) 2009-04-02
WO2007106512A2 (en) 2007-09-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7720254B2 (en) Automatic microparticle mark reader
KR101355389B1 (en) Method of marking a document or item; method and device for identifying the marked document or item; use of circular polarizing particles
US9016577B2 (en) Machine-readable symbols
EP2637145B1 (en) Method of marking and identifying a document or item having circular polarizing particles
JP2013069188A (en) Individual identifying device, individual identifying method, and program
JP5765152B2 (en) Authentication apparatus, authentication method, and program
US8336783B2 (en) Polymeric thread with miniature pattern and fluorescent taggant for anti-counterfeit applications and method of making same

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 07753042

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A2

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2007753042

Country of ref document: EP