Neuroimaging as a means for validating whether a stimulus such as advertisement, communication, or product evokes a certain mental response such as emotion, preference, or memory, or to predict the consequences of the stimulus on later behavior such as consumption or purchasing. Subjects are exposed to stimuli of varying types. Their brain responses are then measured by any one or a combination of neuroimaging devices. The results of neuroimaging are then used to predict future behavior of the subject and those similarly situated with respect to purchase or consumption of products, based upon the non-subjective evidence of neuroimaging. |
Citations|
| US5243517 | Aug 3, 1988 | Sep 7, 1993 | Westinghouse Electric Corp. | Method and apparatus for physiological evaluation of short films and entertainment materials | | US5253168 | Dec 6, 1991 | Oct 12, 1993 | | System for creative expression based on biofeedback | | US5436830 | Feb 1, 1993 | Jul 25, 1995 | | Metaphor elicitation method and apparatus | | US5613498 | Jul 28, 1994 | Mar 25, 1997 | Pioneer Electronic Corporation | Apparatus and method for leading human mind and body |
Referenced by|
| US6289234 | Dec 2, 1999 | Sep 11, 2001 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method for time-resolved and location-resolved presentation of functional brain activities with magnetic resonance and apparatus for the implementation of the method | | US6402520 | Aug 12, 1999 | Jun 11, 2002 | Unique Logic and Technology, Inc. | Electroencephalograph based biofeedback system for improving learning skills | | US6422870 | May 22, 2000 | Jul 23, 2002 | Sony Corporation | Preference detecting apparatus and method and medium therefor | | US6585521 | Dec 21, 2001 | Jul 1, 2003 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Video indexing based on viewers' behavior and emotion feedback | | US6626676 | Jun 7, 2002 | Sep 30, 2003 | Unique Logic and Technology, Inc. | Electroencephalograph based biofeedback system for improving learning skills | | US6628918 | Feb 21, 2001 | Sep 30, 2003 | SRI International, Inc. | System, method and computer program product for instant group learning feedback via image-based marking and aggregation | | US6688890 | Feb 7, 2002 | Feb 10, 2004 | m-tec AG | Device, method and computer program product for measuring a physical or physiological activity by a subject and for assessing the psychosomatic state of the subject | | US6863534 | Aug 11, 2000 | Mar 8, 2005 | Energia, Inc. | Color preference self-help system | | US6893265 | Mar 25, 2002 | May 17, 2005 | Energia, Inc. | Color preference self-help system with improved color preference rankings and scoring | | US6907280 | Mar 30, 2001 | Jun 14, 2005 | The General Hospital Corporation | Method and apparatus for objectively measuring pain, pain treatment and other related techniques | | US7113916 | Sep 7, 2001 | Sep 26, 2006 | | Method of facial coding monitoring for the purpose of gauging the impact and appeal of commercially-related stimuli | | US7155371 | Feb 28, 2006 | Dec 26, 2006 | Arkray, Inc. | Measuring device with comment input function | | US7246081 | May 5, 2006 | Jul 17, 2007 | | Method of facial coding monitoring for the purpose of gauging the impact and appeal of commercially-related stimuli | | US7567693 | Nov 8, 2005 | Jul 28, 2009 | | Methods for physiological monitoring training, exercise and regulation | | US7660459 | Jun 12, 2001 | Feb 9, 2010 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for predicting customer behavior based on data network geography | | US7769626 | Aug 25, 2004 | Aug 3, 2010 | Tom Reynolds | Determining strategies for increasing loyalty of a population to an entity | | US7930199 | Jul 21, 2006 | Apr 19, 2011 | Sensory Logic, Inc. | Method and report assessing consumer reaction to a stimulus by matching eye position with facial coding | | US8065240 | Oct 31, 2007 | Nov 22, 2011 | The Invention Science Fund I | Computational user-health testing responsive to a user interaction with advertiser-configured content | | US8069125 | Dec 20, 2007 | Nov 29, 2011 | The Invention Science Fund I | Methods and systems for comparing media content | | US8092227 | Jul 1, 2003 | Jan 10, 2012 | SRI International | Method and apparatus for group learning via sequential explanation templates | | US8126220 | May 3, 2007 | Feb 28, 2012 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company L.P. | Annotating stimulus based on determined emotional response | | US8150796 | Dec 20, 2007 | Apr 3, 2012 | The Invention Science Fund I | Methods and systems for inducing behavior in a population cohort | | US8151292 | Oct 2, 2008 | Apr 3, 2012 | Emsense Corporation | System for remote access to media, and reaction and survey data from viewers of the media | | US8195593 | Dec 20, 2007 | Jun 5, 2012 | The Invention Science Fund I | Methods and systems for indicating behavior in a population cohort | | US8209224 | Oct 29, 2009 | Jun 26, 2012 | The Nielsen Company (US), LLC | Intracluster content management using neuro-response priming data | | US8226418 | Jan 10, 2011 | Jul 24, 2012 | | Method and apparatus for personal awareness and growth | | US8230457 | May 17, 2007 | Jul 24, 2012 | The Nielsen Company (US), LLC. | Method and system for using coherence of biological responses as a measure of performance of a media | | US8235725 | Feb 20, 2005 | Aug 7, 2012 | Sensory Logic, Inc. | Computerized method of assessing consumer reaction to a business stimulus employing facial coding | | US8239000 | Mar 21, 2007 | Aug 7, 2012 | | Dimensional approach to identifying emotional responses using functional brain imaging |
Claims1. A method of evaluating stimulus materials comprising: - selecting subjects;
- exposing the subject to stimulus materials;
- monitoring the subjects in a neuroimaging device while exposing the subjects to the stimulus materials;
- collecting data from the neuroimaging device; and
- analyzing the data.
2. The method of evaluating stimulus materials of claim 1, where the neuroimaging device is selected from the group of neuroimaging devices consisting of positron emission tomography, functional magnetic resonance imaging, magnetoencephalography and single photon emission computer tomography. 3. The method of evaluating stimulus materials of claim 1, where the stimulus materials are selected from the group of stimuli consisting of visual, auditory, and a combination of visual and auditory. 4. The method of evaluating stimulus materials of claim 1, further comprising: - selecting subjects based on predefined parameters.
5. The method of evaluating stimulus materials of claim 4, where the predefined parameters are selected from the group of parameters consisting of age, income level, gender, education, and a combination thereof. 6. The method of evaluating stimulus materials of claim 1, where the stimulus materials are selected from the group of materials consisting of copy from an advertisement, description of a hypothetical environment, description of an actual environment, description of a hypothetical situation, description of an actual situation, description of a hypothetical behavior, and description of an actual behavior. 7. The method of evaluating stimulus materials of claim 1, further comprising: - testing the subjects memory of the stimulus materials at a predetermined time period after exposing the subject to the stimulus materials.
8. The method of evaluating stimulus materials of claim 1, further comprising: - monitoring the subject's behavior for a predetermined time period after exposing the subject to the stimulus materials.
9. A method of validating a questionnaire comprising: - selecting subjects;
- exposing the subjects to stimulus materials;
- monitoring the subjects in a neuroimaging device while exposing the subjects to the stimulus materials;
- collecting data from the neuroimaging device;
- analyzing the data;
- providing the subject with a questionnaire which is completed by the subject;
- correlating the questionnaire responses with the analyzed data from the neuroimaging device.
10. The method of validating a questionnaire of claim 9, where the neuroimaging device is selected from the group of neuroimaging devices consisting of positron emission tomography, functional magnetic resonance imaging, magnetoencephalography and single photon emission computer tomography. 11. The method of validating a questionnaire of claim 9, where the stimulus materials are selected from the group of stimuli consisting of visual, auditory, and a combination of visual and auditory. 12. The method of validating a questionnaire of claim 9, further comprising: - selecting subjects based on predefined parameters.
13. The method of validating a questionnaire of claim 12, where the predefined parameters are selected from the group of parameters consisting of age, income level, gender, education, and a combination thereof. 14. The method of validating a questionnaire of claim 9, where the stimulus materials are selected from the group of materials consisting of copy from an advertisement, description of a hypothetical environment, description of an actual environment, description of a hypothetical situation, description of an actual situation, description of a hypothetical behavior, and description of an actual behavior. 15. The method of validating a questionnaire of claim 9, further comprising: - testing the subjects memory of the stimulus materials at a predetermined time period after exposing the subject to the stimulus materials.
16. The method of validating a questionnaire of claim 9, further comprising: - monitoring the subject's behavior for a predetermined time period after exposing the subject to the stimulus materials.
17. A method of predicting behavior comprising: - selecting a first set of subjects;
- exposing the first set of subjects to stimulus materials;
- monitoring the first set of subjects in a neuroimaging device while exposing the first set of subjects to stimulus materials;
- collecting data from the neuroimaging device;
- determining the measures of activation in a set of brain regions of interest from the collected data;
- obtaining a behavioral measurement from the first set of subjects; and
- correlating the behavioral measurement with the measures of activation in the set of brain regions of interest.
18. The method of predicting behavior of claim 17 further comprising: - providing the first set of subjects with a questionnaire which is completed by the first set of subjects to yield questionnaire results; and
- correlating the questionnaire results with the behavioral measurement and the measures of activation in the set of brain regions of interest.
19. The method of predicting behavior of claim 18 further comprising: - selecting a second set of subjects;
- monitoring the second set of subjects in a neuroimaging device while exposing the second set of subjects to a second type of stimulus materials;
- collecting data from the neuroimaging device;
- determining the measures of activation in a set of brain regions of interest from the collected data; and
- determining whether the stimulus materials or the second type of stimulus materials produces the greatest measures of activation in the set of brain regions of interest.
20. The method of predicting behavior of claim 19 further comprising: - analyzing characteristics of the stimulus materials and the second type of stimulus materials;
- correlating the characteristics with the collected data.
21. The method of predicting behavior of claim 20 further comprising: - determining which of the characteristics produces the greatest measures of activation in the set of brain regions of interest.
|