Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Advanced Patent Search | Web History | Sign in

Patents

Neuroimaging as a means for validating whether a stimulus such as advertisement, communication, or product evokes a certain mental response such as emotion, preference, or memory, or to predict the consequences of the stimulus on later behavior such as consumption or purchasing. Subjects are exposed to stimuli of varying types. Their brain responses are then measured by any one or a combination of neuroimaging devices. The results of neuroimaging are then used to predict future behavior of the subject and those similarly situated with respect to purchase or consumption of products, based upon the non-subjective evidence of neuroimaging.

InventorsGerald Zaltman, Stephen M. Kosslyn
Primary Examiner: Chanda Harris
Current U.S. Classification434/236; 434/362; 600/301; 600/306; 715/256
International Classification: G09B 1900

View patent at USPTO
Search USPTO Assignment Database

Citations

Cited PatentFiling dateIssue dateOriginal AssigneeTitle
US5243517Aug 3, 1988Sep 7, 1993Westinghouse Electric Corp.Method and apparatus for physiological evaluation of short films and entertainment materials
US5253168Dec 6, 1991Oct 12, 1993System for creative expression based on biofeedback
US5436830Feb 1, 1993Jul 25, 1995Metaphor elicitation method and apparatus
US5613498Jul 28, 1994Mar 25, 1997Pioneer Electronic CorporationApparatus and method for leading human mind and body

Referenced by

Citing PatentFiling dateIssue dateOriginal AssigneeTitle
US6289234Dec 2, 1999Sep 11, 2001Siemens AktiengesellschaftMethod for time-resolved and location-resolved presentation of functional brain activities with magnetic resonance and apparatus for the implementation of the method
US6402520Aug 12, 1999Jun 11, 2002Unique Logic and Technology, Inc.Electroencephalograph based biofeedback system for improving learning skills
US6422870May 22, 2000Jul 23, 2002Sony CorporationPreference detecting apparatus and method and medium therefor
US6585521Dec 21, 2001Jul 1, 2003Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.Video indexing based on viewers' behavior and emotion feedback
US6626676Jun 7, 2002Sep 30, 2003Unique Logic and Technology, Inc.Electroencephalograph based biofeedback system for improving learning skills
US6628918Feb 21, 2001Sep 30, 2003SRI International, Inc.System, method and computer program product for instant group learning feedback via image-based marking and aggregation
US6688890Feb 7, 2002Feb 10, 2004m-tec AGDevice, method and computer program product for measuring a physical or physiological activity by a subject and for assessing the psychosomatic state of the subject
US6863534Aug 11, 2000Mar 8, 2005Energia, Inc.Color preference self-help system
US6893265Mar 25, 2002May 17, 2005Energia, Inc.Color preference self-help system with improved color preference rankings and scoring
US6907280Mar 30, 2001Jun 14, 2005The General Hospital CorporationMethod and apparatus for objectively measuring pain, pain treatment and other related techniques
US7113916Sep 7, 2001Sep 26, 2006Method of facial coding monitoring for the purpose of gauging the impact and appeal of commercially-related stimuli
US7155371Feb 28, 2006Dec 26, 2006Arkray, Inc.Measuring device with comment input function
US7246081May 5, 2006Jul 17, 2007Method of facial coding monitoring for the purpose of gauging the impact and appeal of commercially-related stimuli
US7567693Nov 8, 2005Jul 28, 2009Methods for physiological monitoring training, exercise and regulation
US7660459Jun 12, 2001Feb 9, 2010International Business Machines CorporationMethod and system for predicting customer behavior based on data network geography
US7769626Aug 25, 2004Aug 3, 2010Tom ReynoldsDetermining strategies for increasing loyalty of a population to an entity
US7930199Jul 21, 2006Apr 19, 2011Sensory Logic, Inc.Method and report assessing consumer reaction to a stimulus by matching eye position with facial coding
US8065240Oct 31, 2007Nov 22, 2011The Invention Science Fund IComputational user-health testing responsive to a user interaction with advertiser-configured content
US8069125Dec 20, 2007Nov 29, 2011The Invention Science Fund IMethods and systems for comparing media content
US8092227Jul 1, 2003Jan 10, 2012SRI InternationalMethod and apparatus for group learning via sequential explanation templates
US8126220May 3, 2007Feb 28, 2012Hewlett-Packard Development Company L.P.Annotating stimulus based on determined emotional response
US8150796Dec 20, 2007Apr 3, 2012The Invention Science Fund IMethods and systems for inducing behavior in a population cohort
US8151292Oct 2, 2008Apr 3, 2012Emsense CorporationSystem for remote access to media, and reaction and survey data from viewers of the media
US8195593Dec 20, 2007Jun 5, 2012The Invention Science Fund IMethods and systems for indicating behavior in a population cohort
US8209224Oct 29, 2009Jun 26, 2012The Nielsen Company (US), LLCIntracluster content management using neuro-response priming data
US8226418Jan 10, 2011Jul 24, 2012Method and apparatus for personal awareness and growth
US8230457May 17, 2007Jul 24, 2012The Nielsen Company (US), LLC.Method and system for using coherence of biological responses as a measure of performance of a media
US8235725Feb 20, 2005Aug 7, 2012Sensory Logic, Inc.Computerized method of assessing consumer reaction to a business stimulus employing facial coding
US8239000Mar 21, 2007Aug 7, 2012Dimensional approach to identifying emotional responses using functional brain imaging

Claims

1. A method of evaluating stimulus materials comprising:

selecting subjects;
exposing the subject to stimulus materials;
monitoring the subjects in a neuroimaging device while exposing the subjects to the stimulus materials;
collecting data from the neuroimaging device; and
analyzing the data.

2. The method of evaluating stimulus materials of claim 1, where the neuroimaging device is selected from the group of neuroimaging devices consisting of positron emission tomography, functional magnetic resonance imaging, magnetoencephalography and single photon emission computer tomography.

3. The method of evaluating stimulus materials of claim 1, where the stimulus materials are selected from the group of stimuli consisting of visual, auditory, and a combination of visual and auditory.

4. The method of evaluating stimulus materials of claim 1, further comprising:

selecting subjects based on predefined parameters.

5. The method of evaluating stimulus materials of claim 4, where the predefined parameters are selected from the group of parameters consisting of age, income level, gender, education, and a combination thereof.

6. The method of evaluating stimulus materials of claim 1, where the stimulus materials are selected from the group of materials consisting of copy from an advertisement, description of a hypothetical environment, description of an actual environment, description of a hypothetical situation, description of an actual situation, description of a hypothetical behavior, and description of an actual behavior.

7. The method of evaluating stimulus materials of claim 1, further comprising:

testing the subjects memory of the stimulus materials at a predetermined time period after exposing the subject to the stimulus materials.

8. The method of evaluating stimulus materials of claim 1, further comprising:

monitoring the subject's behavior for a predetermined time period after exposing the subject to the stimulus materials.

9. A method of validating a questionnaire comprising:

selecting subjects;
exposing the subjects to stimulus materials;
monitoring the subjects in a neuroimaging device while exposing the subjects to the stimulus materials;
collecting data from the neuroimaging device;
analyzing the data;
providing the subject with a questionnaire which is completed by the subject;
correlating the questionnaire responses with the analyzed data from the neuroimaging device.

10. The method of validating a questionnaire of claim 9, where the neuroimaging device is selected from the group of neuroimaging devices consisting of positron emission tomography, functional magnetic resonance imaging, magnetoencephalography and single photon emission computer tomography.

11. The method of validating a questionnaire of claim 9, where the stimulus materials are selected from the group of stimuli consisting of visual, auditory, and a combination of visual and auditory.

12. The method of validating a questionnaire of claim 9, further comprising:

selecting subjects based on predefined parameters.

13. The method of validating a questionnaire of claim 12, where the predefined parameters are selected from the group of parameters consisting of age, income level, gender, education, and a combination thereof.

14. The method of validating a questionnaire of claim 9, where the stimulus materials are selected from the group of materials consisting of copy from an advertisement, description of a hypothetical environment, description of an actual environment, description of a hypothetical situation, description of an actual situation, description of a hypothetical behavior, and description of an actual behavior.

15. The method of validating a questionnaire of claim 9, further comprising:

testing the subjects memory of the stimulus materials at a predetermined time period after exposing the subject to the stimulus materials.

16. The method of validating a questionnaire of claim 9, further comprising:

monitoring the subject's behavior for a predetermined time period after exposing the subject to the stimulus materials.

17. A method of predicting behavior comprising:

selecting a first set of subjects;
exposing the first set of subjects to stimulus materials;
monitoring the first set of subjects in a neuroimaging device while exposing the first set of subjects to stimulus materials;
collecting data from the neuroimaging device;
determining the measures of activation in a set of brain regions of interest from the collected data;
obtaining a behavioral measurement from the first set of subjects; and
correlating the behavioral measurement with the measures of activation in the set of brain regions of interest.

18. The method of predicting behavior of claim 17 further comprising:

providing the first set of subjects with a questionnaire which is completed by the first set of subjects to yield questionnaire results; and
correlating the questionnaire results with the behavioral measurement and the measures of activation in the set of brain regions of interest.

19. The method of predicting behavior of claim 18 further comprising:

selecting a second set of subjects;
monitoring the second set of subjects in a neuroimaging device while exposing the second set of subjects to a second type of stimulus materials;
collecting data from the neuroimaging device;
determining the measures of activation in a set of brain regions of interest from the collected data; and
determining whether the stimulus materials or the second type of stimulus materials produces the greatest measures of activation in the set of brain regions of interest.

20. The method of predicting behavior of claim 19 further comprising:

analyzing characteristics of the stimulus materials and the second type of stimulus materials;
correlating the characteristics with the collected data.

21. The method of predicting behavior of claim 20 further comprising:

determining which of the characteristics produces the greatest measures of activation in the set of brain regions of interest.