Forgive Eli if he is old, but didn't Revkin's paper publish the Pentagon Papers way back when?? ReplyDelete. TheTracker February 22, 2012 2:56 AM. Seems like it did. And it seems like more than one reporter and more than ...

What about the Pentagon Papers? they asked. As for not posting the e-mail, Revkin said he should have used better language in his blog, Dot Earth, to explain the decision, which was driven by advice from a Times attorney.

In the new tradition of Dot Earth in which readers' contributions are occasionally brought out front, I'm introducing Raymond T. Pierrehumbert of the University of Chicago and the (hacked) RealClimate.org blog. His comment ... Certainly, I thought
it was right to publish the Pentagon Papers. ... In Dot Earth, which recently moved from the news side of The Times to the Opinion section, Andrew C. Revkin examines efforts to balance human affairs with the planet's limits.

... by Anthony Watts. Paul Chesser of the American Spectator writes about Andy Revkin's lack of coverage at the NYT blog “Dot Earth”, in Andy Did Something Good Last Night, and gives him some points for posting a rebuttal. .... It took the NY
Times and WaPo nearly 24 hours to even report a hack at the CRU, let alone revealed what a bombshell it would be to climate science. I decided at that point, ... The Pentagon Papers is the most widely known example. nc says: ...

AS world leaders prepare to meet tomorrow in Copenhagen to address global warming, skeptics are pointing to e-mail hacked from a computer server at a British university as evidence that the conference may be much ado about nothing. ... The
lawyer, George Freeman, told me that there is a large legal distinction between government documents like the Pentagon Papers, which The Times published over the objections of the Nixon administration, and e-mail ...

There's also this: Revkin was the same Times reporter who refused to publish the first trove of ClimateGate emails in 2009, claiming they were off-limits because they were “private” conversations (a standard the paper evidently hasn't ... And they
don't contain any obvious state military secrets as well, unlike say the Pentagon Papers during the Vietnam War or more recently, the secrets of War on Terror, or any of a number of other leaked documents the Times has ...

Romm, Revkin, Dave Roberts, Zimmer are all fighting hard to keep the message fresh. We're a little concerned with Oolius at the moment. He might be .... Pentagon papers - leaked. CRU emails - server hacked and emails stolen. Reason they
were obtained: Pentagon papers - contents felt to be in public interest. CRU emails - fishing expedition. Biggest champion: Pentagon papers - Noam Chomsky CRU emails - James Delingpole. Posted by: Alex | November 21, ...

Wasn't it the New York Times that is famous for publishing the Pentagon papers that also were acquired illegally and never intended for the public eye? Consider what would happen if the shoe were on the other foot. Suppose ...

The NYT's Revkin has a piece whose headline and lede, typically, misses the entire point, “Hacked E-Mails Fuel Climate Change Skeptics.” Note to ... The lawyer, George Freeman, told me that there is a large legal distinction between
government documents like the Pentagon Papers, which The Times published over the objections of the Nixon administration, and e-mail between private individuals, even if they may receive some government money for their work.

What about the Pentagon Papers? they asked. Hoyt asked some of the right questions, but had weak answers: Does Revkin have a conflict of interest, as Steven Milloy, the publisher of JunkScience.com, and others contended ...