About 15,800 results
|But there is no independent way of knowing P or of knowing J.3 A general |
epistemic principle must be tested on particular epistemic judgements; and vice
versa. 6. From 4 and 5: we cannot know both P andJ. This constitutes (in a
|True, this playing back and forth will be entirely legitimate if we insist that |
knowing requires knowing that one knows, but ... on knowing that P: does the
intuition that we cannot bootstrap ourselves into knowing that we know prevent
|But this is not in accord with the epistemological doctrine which claims that we |
cannot know and believe the same thing at the ... presupposes knowing" and that
"believing is a stage we sometimes reach in the endeavour to attain knowledge".
|Scholarship is to be created not by compulsion, but by awakening a pure interest |
in knowledge. The wise instructor accomplishes this ... Emerson, Ralph Waldo
Knowledge is knowing that we cannot know. - Emerson, Ralph Waldo
|we make the effort seriously enough, discover some of the limitations there are in |
our knowing, arising from our finitude; ... A second limitation is that in our efforts to
acquire knowledge we have to proceed one step at a time, we cannot know ...
|his experience is objective to both of them and indeed must be independent of |
them since they cannot be changed in this ... We may know that we know, butwe
do not know also that we produce our knowledge in the course of knowing and ...
|Tacit Knowledge In 1966 Michael Polanyi wrote a small book called, The Tacit |
Dimension published by Peter Smith, of Gloucester, ... In that book, Polanyi had a
wonderful insight that, as human beings, “we can know more than we can tell” (p.
... Polanyi argued that “the proximal is that term we know and we cannot tell” (p.
|How do we learn that what we need is not more knowledge but the willingness to |
forgo knowing? ... This is why we think skepticism must mean that we cannot
know the world exists, and hence that perhaps there isn't one (a conclusion some
|To know anything as a knower is to know it as performing the function of knowing. |
And where else can one have ... knower in the act of knowing. We cannot think of
knowledge without any reference to the knower, the owner of the knowledge.