Star Trek: The Original Series

I grew up watching this show on a black and white tv from age 6. Some episodes scared the crap out of me but that's how caught up I was in the story, especially for watching it in black and white! My imagination filled in the rest! And that's why I consider this one of the best tv shows out there: it conveyed the story without flashiness and completely engaged the viewer. That being said, I want to point out (after having read many of the comments here) that one cannot view every aspect of the show through the eyes of someone in 2018. It wasn't done in that year so it's unfair to judge it that way. It was written and produced in 1966 originally, a time when women were still trying to find a foothold in making their own way, in making names for themselves. Yes, unfortunately, there are some stereotypes seen but that was, again, due to the times and mindsets of those in charge at CBS. Roddenberry wanted to give women their due, and that's obvious in his casting a woman as second-in-command, something plainly seen in the original pilot "The Cage". Majel Barrett was that officer...but CBS nixed the idea, saying that "no one will accept a woman in charge". No matter how Roddenberry fought for it, they turned him down and asked for a different pilot. So he gave them "Where No Man Has Gone Before", which got Star Trek on the air. Roddenberry had to choose his battles, and along the way during the three year run that they had, he was able to sneak in women's lib, political messages, toleration for people different from you, and minor cursing, which was absolutely unheard of in those days. Honestly, the only word I remember was "hell", and it was extremely appropriate for the episode. "The City on the Edge of Forever". Kirk had just allowed the woman he loved to die to preserve the timeline (they had accidentally gone into the past)...if Edith had lived, Starfleet would not have existed the way that it currently did and everything would change. They couldn't risk it. After suffering this, Kirk had every right to say to the crew, "Let's get the hell out of here". Roddenberry was fined for it but to him it was worth it. Some other notes: visible navels weren't acceptable to CBS standards, which is why costumes were strategically designed. Only in the third year could navels be seen bc finally viewers and censors didn't flip by seeing a belly button. The mini skirts were loved by the actresses. I read Nichelle Nichols comment in an article that the ladies found them liberating bc for so long they'd been forced to cover their legs, pretending that they didn't have a femininity. And just for the record, the women in "Mudd's Women" were NOT prostitutes. They were women looking for husbands...under false pretenses, yes, by using the Venus drug, but the main character, Eve, knew this was wrong and fought against it. Mudd was a con man, plain and simple, and was looking to make a buck. These women, in their natural state, were rather homely and had had no luck in finding men who wanted them, so they fell for Mudd's ploy. The point is, it was pointed out as being wrong and the wrong was righted, AND the women still found love and their "happily ever after"...if the men didn't want to back out bc of the false pretenses. Personally, I felt that the episode was a kind of setup for another show to spring from Star Trek but it never came to fruition. Yes, the "weak" and "helpless" women in the crew (Janice Rand needing Spock's help with the amorous crewman) were a bit annoying and still are today (bc really, what military person is going to be unable to defend themselves) but again, I remember when these stories were written and the backwards mindsets existing at the time. But that's what Roddenberry was all about: changing people's mindsets and getting them to think about things differently. He simply could only tackle one thing at a time...and I feel that he did a very good job. Do I let my kids watch this? Absolutely. Do they learn moral lessons? Absolutely. Would I recommend this to others and their kids? Absolutely. It's the yardstick by which I judge other shows: if there's awesome special effects but no good story, I won't continue watching a particular movie or TV show. To me, special effects are icing on the cake but should not detract from the story, the essence of the show. If the writing is lousy, the acting not great, or the direction junk but the effects are fabulous, big deal. The whole thing is junk in my opinion. Shows should focus on getting their point across and not worry about how much money they can blow in a laser gun blast 'cause it's cool. Bottom line: great for families and conversation starters, and learning lessons.

There's a lot of pious types on here showing their moral worth by complaining about some very minor issues that they have discovered. Like with all witch hunters, if they look hard enough they'll find a witch. The rest of us, young and old alike, can get on with enjoying classic entertainment like this. It really is timeless, imaginative, unsanitised TV. The role model traits of heroism, self-sacrifice, taking responsibility, non-harm, courage and strength are all there, as well as a lot of very deep philosophical concepts. Just enjoy it and don't fall into the miserable censorious reality of the neo-puritans who will soon be sitting staring at blank walls in case they view something sinful.