Search Results
[PDF]Intel Itanium Processor specific ABI - Linux Foundation Referenced ...
refspecs.linuxbase.org/elf/IA64-SysV-psABI.pdf
Information in this document is provided in connection with Intel® products. No license, express or implied, by estoppel or otherwise, to any intellectual property rights is granted by this document. Except as provided in Intel's Terms and Conditions of Sale for such products, Intel assumes no liability whatsoever, and Intel ...Itanium C++ ABI - Linux Foundation Referenced Specifications
https://refspecs.linuxfoundation.org/cxxabi-1.86.html
However, it does contain processor-specific material for the Itanium 64-bit ABI, identified as such. Where structured data layout is described, we generally assume Itanium psABI member sizes. An implementation for a 32-bit ABI would typically just change the sizes of members as appropriate (i.e. pointers and long ints ...Missing: atomic
Itanium C++ ABI · GitHub
https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi
Nov 4, 2017 - GitHub is where people build software. More than 26 million people use GitHub to discover, fork, and contribute to over 75 million projects.Missing: atomic
Compile fails with latest LLVM (they switched to std::atomic) · Issue ...
https://github.com/mono/CppSharp/issues/212
Mar 16, 2014 - Be sure to select the Itanium ABI in your options though, not the MS one. Where do I do this? Is this in the CLI project settings / native C++ project settings somewhere or something to specify to CPPSharp to get the binding generated with. The following is all I have in my implementation for ILibrary currently.Itanium® Software Conventions and Runtime Architecture Guide - Intel
https://www.intel.com/.../us/.../itanium/itanium-software-runtime-architecture-guide.html
Architecture Guide: Intel® Itanium® software conventions and runtime. Does not define operating-system interfaces.Frequently Asked Questions - GCC, the GNU Compiler Collection
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/faq.html
For C++, this includes many more details than for C, and most CPU designers (for good reasons elaborated below) have not stepped up to publish C++ ABIs. Such an ABI has been defined for the Itanium architecture (see C++ ABI for Itanium) and that is used by G++ and other compilers as the de facto standard ABI on many ...Fetch-and-add - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fetch-and-add
In computer science, the fetch-and-add CPU instruction (FAA) atomically increments the contents of a memory location by a specified value. That is, fetch-x86-64 - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86-64
Intel was forced to follow suit and introduced a modified NetBurst family which was fully software-compatible with AMD's design and specification. VIA Technologies introduced x86-64 in their VIA Isaiah architecture, with the VIA Nano. The x86-64 specification is distinct from the Intel Itanium architecture (libc/bionic/__cxa_guard.cpp - platform/bionic - Git at Google
https://android.googlesource.com/platform/bionic/+/6e54c3e/.../__cxa_guard.cpp
But the gcc source. // shows all other ARCH follow the definition of Itanium/x86 C++ ABI. #if defined(__arm__). // The ARM C++ ABI mandates that guard variables are 32-bit aligned, 32-bit. // values. The LSB is tested by the compiler-Clang 5.0.0 Release Notes — Clang 5 documentation - Read the Docs
bcain-llvm.readthedocs.io/projects/clang/en/release_50/ReleaseNotes/
When targeting a platform that uses the Itanium C++ ABI, Clang implements a recent change to the ABI that passes objects of class type indirectly if they have a non-trivial move constructor. Previous versions of ... The following property attributes are checked for differences: copy , retain / strong , atomic , getter and setter .