Suchergebnisse
Webergebnisse
Oral arguments - Supreme Court
www.supremecourt.gov › 16-1161...
www.supremecourt.gov › 16-1161...
03.10.2017 — sociological gobbledygook. MR. SMITH: Your Honor, this is - this is not complicated. It is a measure of how unfair the map is. How much burden ...
Amicus brief - Supreme Court of the United States
www.supremecourt.gov › DocketP...
www.supremecourt.gov › DocketP...
08.03.2019 — Gobbledygook: Organizing the Judge's. Partisan Gerrymandering Toolkit into. Tests of Opportunity and Outcome, 17. Election L.J. 302 (2018) .
oral argument - Supreme Court
www.supremecourt.gov › argumen...
www.supremecourt.gov › argumen...
29.04.2015 — gobbledygook, and the other two are irrelevant. Is that. 10 not the case? 11. MR. WYRICK: Well, I'm going to take those. 12 in reverse order.
Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Glenn - Supreme Court
www.supremecourt.gov › opinions
www.supremecourt.gov › opinions
19.06.2008 — 3 The Solicitor General proposes an equally gobbledygook standard: “Reasonableness Under The Totality Of The Circumstances,” a.k.a..
oral argument - Supreme Court
www.supremecourt.gov › argumen...
www.supremecourt.gov › argumen...
28.11.2006 — This is gobbledygook. It really is, it's irrational. MR. GOLDSTEIN: Justice Scalia, I this it would be surprising for this experienced Court and all.
Amicus brief - Broad Institute
www.supremecourt.gov › DocketP...
www.supremecourt.gov › DocketP...
07.03.2019 — gobbledygook”). Transcript of Oral Argument, Gill v. Whitford,. No. 16-1161 (Oct. 3, 2017) at 40. Such concerns would not apply to an extreme ...
oral argument - Supreme Court
www.supremecourt.gov › argument_transcripts
www.supremecourt.gov › argument_transcripts
PDF
04.03.2015 — That is gobbledygook. You. 19 know, "such" must mean something different. 20. GENERAL VERRILLI: It isn't gobbledygook,. 21. Justice Scalia.
At oral argument - Supreme Court
www.supremecourt.gov › argumen...
www.supremecourt.gov › argumen...
03.10.2017 — gobbledygook [2] 40:7,24 gorsuch [20] 22:2,6 23:11,25 50: 14 51:10,13,15,21,24 52:8,25 53:5,. 7,11 58:25 59:8,11,18 61:12 got [6] 12:8,9 16:13 ...
Brief amici curiae of The National Republican Senatorial ...
www.supremecourt.gov › DocketP...
www.supremecourt.gov › DocketP...
26.08.2019 — logical gobbledygook.” Gill v. Whitford, No. 16-1161. (Oct. 3, 2017), Oral Argument Tr. 40:1-7. The following term, this Court answered the ques-.
Andrus v. Texas - Supreme Court of the United States
www.supremecourt.gov › DocketP...
www.supremecourt.gov › DocketP...
12.06.2019 — were only “a lot of psychological gobbledygook.” He claimed he had not noted references to prescriptions for psychotropic medications or to ...